We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Egyptian Religion Origin
Egyptian religious beliefs and practices
were closely integrated into Egyptian
society of the historical period
(from c. 3000 BCE).Religious phenomena
were pervasive, so much so that it is not
meaningful to view religion as a single
entity that cohered as a system.
Nevertheless, religion must be seen
against a background of potentially
nonreligious human activities and
[Link] (5th century BCE)
remarked that the Egyptians were the most
religious of people. During its more than
3,000 years of development, Egyptian
religion underwent significant changes of
emphasis and practice, but in all periods
religion had a clear consistency in
character and [Link] is inappropriate to
define religion narrowly, as consisting onlyin the cult of the gods and in human piety.
Religious behaviour encompassed contact
with the dead, practices such as divination
and oracles, and magic, which mostly
exploited divine instruments and
associations.
There were two essential foci of public
religion: the king and the gods. Both are
among the most characteristic features of
Egyptian civilization. The king was the
centre of human society, the guarantor of
order for the gods, the recipient of god-
given benefits including life itself, and
the benevolent ruler of the world for
humanity. He was ultimately responsible
for the cults of the dead, both for his
predecessors in office and for the dead in
general. His dominance in religion
corresponded to his central political role:
from late predynastic times (c. 3100 BCE),state organization was based on kingship
and on the service of officials for the
king. The king's principal original title,
the Horus name, proclaimed that he was
an aspect of the chief god Horus, a sky
god who was depicted as a falcon.
The king had a unique status between
humanity and the gods, partook in the
world of the gods, and constructed great,
religiously motivated funerary monuments
for his afterlife. The task of the king as the
protagonist of human society was to retain
the benevolence of the gods in
maintaining order against disorder. This
ultimately pessimistic view of the cosmos
was associated principally with the sun
god and the solar cycle. It formed a
powerful legitimation of king and elite in
their task of preserving [Link] king was
almost always depicted as the person
offering to the gods, although templerituals were performed by priests. The
divinized king coexisted with his mortal
self, and as many nonroyal individuals as
kings became deified after [Link]
gods, the king, humanity, and the dead
existed together in the cosmos.
Egyptian religion was polytheistic. The
gods who inhabited the bounded and
ultimately perishable cosmos varied in
nature and [Link] were neither all-
powerful nor all-knowing. Their power was
immeasurably greater than that of human
beings, and they had the ability to live
almost indefinitely, to survive fatal
wounds, to be in more than one place at
once, to affect people in visible and
invisible ways, and so forth. The characters
of the gods were not neatly defined. Most
had a principal association, such as that of
Re with the sun or that of the
goddess Hathor with women, but therewas much overlap, especially among the
leading deities. In general, the more
closely circumscribed a deity's character,
the less powerful that deity was.
Egyptian gods were renowned for their
wide variety of forms, including animal
forms and mixed forms with an animal
head on a human body. The most
important deities were the sun god, who
had several names and aspects and was
associated with many supernatural beings
in a solar cycle modeled on the alternation
of night and day, and Osiris, the god of the
dead and ruler of the underworld. With his
consort, Isis, Osiris became dominant in
many contexts during the 1st
millennium BCE, when solar worship was
in relative [Link] this pessimism,
the official presentation of the cosmos on
the monuments was positive and
optimistic, showing the king and the godsin perpetual reciprocity and harmony. This
implied contrast reaffirmed the fragile
order. Deities had principal manifestations,
and most were associated with one or
more species of animal. For gods the most
important forms were the falcon and bull,
and for goddesses the cow, cobra, vulture,
and lioness. Rams were widespread, while
some manifestations were as modest as
the millipede of the god Sepa. Some gods
were very strongly linked to particular
animals, as Sebek was with the crocodile
and Khepri with the scarab [Link]
could express aspects of a deity’s nature.
Apart from major deities—gods who
received a cult or had a significant cosmic
role—there were important minor figures.
Several of these marginal beings had
grotesque forms and variable [Link]
number of deities was large and was not
fixed. New ones appeared, and someceased to be worshipped. Deities were
grouped in various ways. The most ancient
known grouping is the ennead, which is
probably attested from the 3rd dynasty (c.
2650-2575 BCE).The most common
grouping, principally in the New
Kingdom and later, was the [Link]
important ordering of deities
was syncretism, a term with a special
meaning for Egyptian religion.
Decorum and the affirmation of order
reinforced each [Link] beliefs are
known from monuments and documents
created by and for the king and the small
elite. The beliefs and practices of the rest
of the people are poorly [Link] status
of personal religion in the context of
official cults is poorly [Link]and the next world dominate both the
archaeological record and popular modern
conceptions of Egyptian religion. This
dominance is determined to a great extent
by the landscape of the country, since
tombs were placed if possible in the
desert. Vast resources were expended on
creating prestigious burial places for
absolute rulers or wealthy officials. Tombs
contained elaborate grave goods
representations of “daily life,’ or less
commonly of religious subjects, and some
texts that were intended to help the
deceased attain the next world and
prosper there. The texts came increasingly
to be inscribed on coffins and stone
sarcophagi or deposited in burials on
papyrus. Some royal tombs included long
passages from religious texts, many of
them drawn from nonmortuary
contexts and hence more broadly valuableas source material.
The majority of evidence from ancient
Egypt comes from funerary monuments
and burials of royalty, of the elite, and, for
the Late period, of animals; relatively little
is known of the mortuary practices of the
mass of the [Link] the fear
of the dead, there was a moral
community between the living and the
dead, so that the dead were an essential
part of society, especially in the 3rd and
2nd millennia BCE. The basic purpose of
mortuary preparation was to ensure a safe
and successful passage into the hereafter.
Belief in an afterlife and a passage to it is
evident in predynastic burials, which are
oriented to the west, the domain of the
dead, and which include pottery grave
goods as well as personal possessions of
the deceased. The most strikingdevelopment of later mortuary practice
was mummification, which was related to
a belief that the body must
continue intact for the deceased to live in
the next [Link] evolved
gradually from the Old Kingdom to the
early 1st millennium BCE, after which it
declined. It was too elaborate and costly
ever to be available to the majority.