0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views1 page

Ebara 800 VYM Pump Performance Data

This document contains test results for a Ebara 800 VYM pump with a Yaskawa TEVA-0 motor from 1991 and monitoring results from 2015 and before/after coating comparisons. It provides pump efficiency, total head, motor input kW, flow rate and operating conditions for the tests. The comparisons show a 0.1-0.25m increase in total head, 5.45-7.03% reduction in motor input kW, and 7.33-7.79% increase in pump efficiency after coating was applied.

Uploaded by

JC Mexguy
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views1 page

Ebara 800 VYM Pump Performance Data

This document contains test results for a Ebara 800 VYM pump with a Yaskawa TEVA-0 motor from 1991 and monitoring results from 2015 and before/after coating comparisons. It provides pump efficiency, total head, motor input kW, flow rate and operating conditions for the tests. The comparisons show a 0.1-0.25m increase in total head, 5.45-7.03% reduction in motor input kW, and 7.33-7.79% increase in pump efficiency after coating was applied.

Uploaded by

JC Mexguy
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

3

Model: Ebara 800 VYM (5500m h - 32m - 650kW - 710rpm)


Motor: Yaskawa TEVA-0 (650kW - 6600V - 68.6A -710rpm) S/N 193034101 Sep. 1991

MAKER TEST Date11.9.1991 (32m-5500m3m-650kW)


Total Head Pump Motor Motor Flow rate
m effi.% Input kW effi. % m3/H

51.77 0.00 573.54 95.60 0.0

44.22 46.90 580.85 95.60 2111.0


38.01 68.50 600.63 95.60 3707.0
33.29 86.70 651.16 95.60 5810.0
24.55 82.90 626.54 95.60 7248.0
Monitoring results(11.13.2015)
Total Head Pump Motor Motor Flow rate Operating
m effi.% Input kW effi. % m3/H Conditions
3pps; Tot. Flow:
34.97 82.44 624.00 95.00 4,989.98 13,900 T/h
4pps; Flow:
36.85 70.8 582.00 95.00 3,793.06
14,100 T/h
34.97 m=30.60m(Pd)- -3.97m(Ps)+0.40m(Vh)
624.00 kW= (data provided by client during monitoring)
Previous monitoring data(10.1.2015)
3pps; Tot,
35.22 75.11 660.00 95.00 4,778.14
Flow:12,960 T/h
4pps; Tot. Flow:
38.01 60.82 624.00 95.00 3,389.53 13,000 T/h
35.22 m=31.6m(Pd)--3.26m(Ps)+0.36m(Vh)
660.00 kW= (data provided by client during monitoring)

Comparison at same Flow rate (Before & After coating)


Flow rate Results Difference Percentaje
After coating Total Head m 4778.1 35.32 0.10 0.28 % increase
After coating Input kW 4778.1 613.63 -46.37 -7.03 % reduce
After coating Pump Eff. % 4778.1 80.96 5.85 7.79 % recover
Before coating Total Head m 4778.1 35.22
Before coating Input kW 4778.1 660.00
Before coating Pump Eff. % 4778.1 75.11
Comparison at different Flow rate (Before & After coating)
Flow rate Results Difference Percentaje
After coating Total Head m 4989.98 34.97 (0.25) -0.71 % reduce
After coating Input kW 4989.98 624.00 -36 -5.45 % reduce
After coating Pump Eff. % 4989.98 82.44 7.33 9.76 % recover
Before coating Total Head m 4778.14 35.22
Before coating Input kW 4778.14 660.00
Before coating Pump Eff. % 4778.14 75.11

You might also like