Syllabus
Syllabus
Version 1
Why choose Cambridge International?
Cambridge International prepares school students for life, helping them develop an informed curiosity and a lasting
passion for learning. We are part of the University of Cambridge.
Our Cambridge Pathway gives students a clear path for educational success from age 5 to 19. Schools can shape
the curriculum around how they want students to learn – with a wide range of subjects and flexible ways to offer
them. It helps students discover new abilities and a wider world, and gives them the skills they need for life, so they
can achieve at school, university and work.
Our programmes and qualifications set the global standard for international education. They are created by subject
experts, rooted in academic rigour and reflect the latest educational research. They provide a strong platform for
students to progress from one stage to the next, and are well supported by teaching and learning resources.
We review all our syllabuses regularly, so they reflect the latest research evidence and professional teaching
practice – and take account of the different national contexts in which they are taught.
We consult with teachers to help us design each syllabus around the needs of their learners. Consulting with
leading universities has helped us make sure our syllabuses encourage students to master the key concepts in the
subject and develop the skills necessary for success in higher education.
Our mission is to provide educational benefit through provision of international programmes and qualifications for
school education and to be the world leader in this field. Together with schools, we develop Cambridge learners
who are confident, responsible, reflective, innovative and engaged – equipped for success in the modern world.
Every year, nearly a million Cambridge students from 10 000 schools in 160 countries prepare for their future with
the Cambridge Pathway.
Quality management
Cambridge International is committed to providing exceptional quality. In line with this commitment, our
quality management system for the provision of international qualifications and education programmes for
students aged 5 to 19 is independently certified as meeting the internationally recognised standard,
ISO 9001:2015. Learn more at [Link]/ISO9001
Key benefits
The best motivation for a student is a real passion for the subject
they’re learning. By offering students a variety of Cambridge
International AS & A Levels, you can give them the greatest chance
of finding the path of education they most want to follow. With
over 50 subjects to choose from, students can select the ones
they love and that they’re best at, which helps motivate them
throughout their studies.
Cambridge International AS & A Level Global Perspectives & Research develops a set of transferable skills.
These include critical thinking, deconstructing and differentiating arguments, evaluating claims and developing
strong reasoning. Learners can apply these skills across a range of subjects and complex real-world issues. These
skills equip students well for progression to higher education or directly into employment.
Our approach in Cambridge International AS & A Level Global Perspectives & Research encourages learners to be:
confident, explaining, analysing and evaluating global issues and communicating arguments
responsible, researching extensively and selecting suitable material from a globally diverse range of sources,
directing their own learning
reflective, developing a critical awareness of their personal standpoint and how that impacts on their response to
different opinions and diverse ways of thinking
engaged, working collaboratively to develop each individual’s potential in pursuit of a common goal.
‘Cambridge students develop a deep understanding of subjects and independent thinking skills.’
Principal, Rockledge High School, USA
UK NARIC, the national agency in the UK for the recognition and comparison of international qualifications and
skills, has carried out an independent benchmarking study of Cambridge International AS & A Level and found it
to be comparable to the standard of AS & A Level in the UK. There is no similarly focussed subject to AS & A Level
Global Perspectives & Research in the UK.
Cambridge International AS & A Level Global Perspectives & Research is interdisciplinary and has a strong focus on
the acquisition of skills.
Cambridge International AS Level Global Perspectives & Research makes up the first half of the Cambridge
International A Level course and provides a foundation for the study of Global Perspectives & Research at
Cambridge International A Level. Depending on local university entrance requirements, it may permit or assist
progression directly to university courses in a range of subjects. It is also suitable as part of a course of general
education.
The skills developed by Cambridge International A Level Global Perspectives & Research provide a foundation for a
wide range of courses in higher education. Equally it is suitable as part of a course of general education.
For more information about the relationship between the Cambridge International AS Level and Cambridge
International A Level see the ‘Assessment overview’ section of the Syllabus overview.
We recommend learners check the Cambridge recognitions database and university websites to find the most
up-to-date entry requirements for courses they wish to study.
‘The depth of knowledge displayed by the best A Level students makes them prime targets for
America’s Ivy League universities.’
Yale University, USA
Supporting teachers
We provide a wide range of resources, detailed guidance and innovative training and professional development so
that you can give your students the best possible preparation for Cambridge International AS & A Level. To find out
which resources are available for each syllabus go to our School Support Hub.
The School Support Hub is our secure online site for Cambridge teachers where you can find the resources you need
to deliver our programmes. You can also keep up to date with your subject and the global Cambridge community
through our online discussion forums.
Sign up for email notifications about changes to syllabuses, including new and revised products and services at
[Link]/syllabusupdates
Professional development
We support teachers through:
• Introductory Training – face-to-face or online
• Extension Training – face-to-face or online
• Enrichment Professional Development – face-to-face or online
Find out more at [Link]/events
2 Syllabus overview
Aims
The aims describe the purposes of a course based on this syllabus.
Skills overview
Cambridge International AS & A Level Global Perspectives & Research develops learners’ thinking skills of analysis,
evaluation and synthesis through considering a range of global topics. Learners will develop skills of independent
enquiry and learn about appropriate research methods and methodology.
Learners will be encouraged to develop research, reasoning and communication skills systematically, using
an approach called the Critical Path. This approach helps them to interrogate information, explore different
perspectives and communicate personal reflections.
Learners are encouraged to work both independently and collaboratively, with respect for and understanding of
different cultures and perspectives.
This is a skills-based subject and schools can make their own selection of global topics to study. Learners can
draw upon knowledge and understanding gained from studying other subjects. Learners will develop skills that are
interdisciplinary and highly transferable to other subjects.
‘Cambridge International AS & A Levels prepare students well for university because they’ve
learnt to go into a subject in considerable depth. There’s that ability to really understand the
depth and richness and the detail of a subject. It’s a wonderful preparation for what they are
going to face at university.’
US Higher Education Advisory Council
Assessment overview
Component 1 Component 3
Component 2 Component 4
There are three routes for Cambridge International AS & A Level Global Perspectives & Research:
Route Component 1 Component 2 Component 3 Component 4
1 AS Level only
(Candidates take all AS components
in the same exam series)
3 A Level
(Candidates take all components in
the same exam series)
* Candidates carry forward their AS Level result subject to the rules and time limits described in the Cambridge Handbook.
Candidates following an AS Level route are eligible for grades a–e. Candidates following an A Level route are eligible
for grades A*–E.
Assessment objectives
The assessment objectives (AOs) are:
AO2 Reflection
• acknowledge different perspectives and evaluate their impact on the learner’s own standpoint
• consider the extent and limits of the learning and research that has been undertaken
• reflect on and evaluate the effectiveness of collaboration with others (AS Level only)
• reflect on and justify the scope, nature and limitations of the learner’s own research report (A Level only)
AO3 Communication
• produce structured, written arguments using appropriate terms and referencing where applicable
• produce a structured presentation using language appropriate for the audience (AS Level only)
• communicate information visually in order to engage an audience (AS Level only)
AO2 Reflection 15 20
AO3 Communication 20 15
AO1 R
esearch, analysis and 89 63 40 65
evaluation
AO2 Reflection – 22 25 20
AO3 Communication 11 15 35 15
This syllabus gives you the flexibility to design a course that will interest, challenge and engage your learners.
Where appropriate you are responsible for selecting topics, resources and examples to support your learners’ study.
These should be appropriate for the learners’ age, cultural background and learning context as well as complying
with your school policies and local legal requirements.
Cambridge International AS Level Global Perspectives & Research is a skills-based syllabus which uses global
issues as a context for study. Following this syllabus will equip students with the skills to be effective, active
participants in a rapidly changing intellectual and technical environment. Importantly, this syllabus also prepares
and encourages learners to work with confidence both independently and collaboratively, with respect for and
understanding of different cultures.
Cambridge International A Level Global Perspectives & Research encourages the development of independent
enquiry and an understanding and use of appropriate research methods and methodology. When following this
course, learners need to become fully engaged in a research process of their own. The course provides further
development and practice of the higher-order thinking skills of analysis, evaluation and synthesis.
The Critical Path offers a systematic approach to teaching and learning where learners develop the ability to
deconstruct and reconstruct arguments about global issues through personal research and interrogation of
evidence. By reflecting on the implications of their research and the personal judgements it leads them to make,
students learn to communicate their findings and ideas through a range of appropriate formats.
Visit the online Learning Area to find support for both learners and teachers:
[Link] Teachers can log into the area to access resources and course
content. It also allows learners around the world to collaborate between schools, countries and cultures, helping
to foster genuine global perspectives.
Deconstruction
Reconstruction
Reflection
To follow are examples of the sort of questions that teachers and learners might think about at each stage of the
Critical Path.
Deconstruction: Which different perspectives are represented? Identify and compare different
conduct a detailed analysis perspectives on an issue made up of arguments, claims, views, beliefs and
and evaluation of a point evidence.
of view What are the key components of the argument or claim? Differentiate
between fact, argument, opinion, rant, speculation, prediction, explanation,
hypothesis, account and belief. Identify conclusions, reasons (premises),
assumptions (stated and unstated), assertions (and counter-assertions) and
supporting evidence.
What are the implications of the conclusions, arguments, reasoning or claims?
Suggest the consequences of the conclusions, arguments, reasoning or claims.
What are the strengths and weaknesses of arguments, reasoning or claims?
Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses in the arguments, reasoning or claims.
Assess the use of analogy and identify any errors in the reasoning.
How strong is the evidence? Identify whether evidence gives strong or weak
support to the conclusion or claim. Consider the reliability of the evidence
and suggest other evidence required to substantiate or refute claims or
counterclaims.
Reflection: What was your personal viewpoint before carrying out research? Reflect on
explore the impact of initial personal perspectives before any research or thinking has been done.
research on personal How does your own viewpoint relate to the perspectives identified in the
perspectives research? Evaluate personal viewpoints against alternative perspectives on
issues.
What impact has the research had on any views you had before? Evaluate
the impact of alternative perspectives on your personal viewpoint.
Why has the research had an effect on your previous views? Justify the
reasons why personal perspectives have changed as a result of research.
What additional research might be useful? Identify and justify possible future
research directions.
Communication and How can I work with others to identify problems and devise effective
collaboration: solutions? Find ways of working together and maximising each person’s
communicate views, potential in pursuit of a common goal.
information and How effective was our work together? Identify the strengths and weaknesses
research effectively and of your teamwork. Consider what made the collaboration effective or
convincingly; work with ineffective in relation to the team’s goal. Make suggestions for improving
others as part of a group teamwork in the future.
How can arguments be made effectively and persuasively? Communicate
your reasoning in a well-structured, clear and effective manner using
appropriate written or spoken conventions.
How should research findings be communicated to a non-specialist
audience? Define and use appropriate terms consistently. Cite and reference
sources in an appropriate and recognisable way.
What is the most appropriate way to present to an audience? Select and
organise material for a listening audience. Choose the most appropriate audio
or visual media to support the arguments being made. Prepare and use a range
of effective presentational methods to reinforce arguments and ideas.
The skills of the Critical Path can be mapped to each component, as shown below:
Component Skill
Deconstruction Reconstruction Reflection Communication Collaboration
1 Written
exam
2 Essay
3 Team Project
4 Cambridge
Research
Report
Technology Culture
Science
Global Economics
topic
Politics Environment
Ethics
Example 1
Consider the topic ‘Sport in an international context’ through the themes of economics, politics, culture and
ethics. Global issues emerge, such as who should be responsible for funding events such as the Olympics?
Different perspectives could emerge from this issue, for example:
Perspective 1: Funding Olympic events is a drain on taxpayers’ money. This perspective may be based on
different arguments about the value of the Olympics, the needs of the taxpayer, the possible economic
benefits, and the political popularity or unpopularity of spending public money. Behind this perspective may be
assumptions and beliefs about the importance of international sport relative to the costs of the Olympics.
This perspective draws on the themes of economics and politics.
Perspective 2: Funding Olympic venues is worth the investment and a good use of taxpayers’ money because
of the profit the venues produce after the event. The key word in this perspective is ‘worth’ and the assumption
that the Olympics is worth the investment for the resulting economic and financial benefits and for the political
prestige it brings to the host country. Behind this perspective there is a general outlook on the funding of
the Olympics which contains different assumptions, views, justifications and beliefs to those associated with
Perspective 1.
This perspective draws on the themes of economics, politics, culture and ethics.
To follow are two other examples of how themes, issues and perspectives might be connected.
Example 2
Tourism
Topic
Tourist companies should pay a Tourist companies attract and generate wide
Perspectives local tax to help fund local economic benefits for local areas, they
environmental projects should not be expected to pay local taxes
The relationship
between regulation
Issues of the internet and
the rise of a global
superpower
Key terms
Global topics are broad potential areas for study. Learners can use topics as starting points for identifying issues.
Themes are approaches to topics or issues, for example culture, economics, the environment, ethics, politics,
science and technology. A specific thematic approach to an issue can help to identify a perspective on that issue.
Issues are specific, more narrowly defined areas within a topic that are suitable as subjects for an essay or other
piece of work. An issue often has global interest or relevance and can combine specific areas of different topics
or themes.
A perspective is a coherent world view which is a response to an issue. A perspective is made up of argument,
evidence and assumptions and may be influenced by a particular context.
Arguments consist of one or more reasons that lead to a conclusion. These reasons may be supported by
evidence: facts or other data which can be primary (first-hand information) or secondary (which may be based
on primary evidence but are not from the situation itself). Learners will make judgements about arguments they
find and create arguments of their own.
Assumptions are reasons which are not stated but are still part of an argument.
The provenance of a source includes its author and where or when it was written.
Component 1 contains three questions based on two source documents provided with the exam paper. The source
documents may present different perspectives on an issue of global significance.
Question 1 (5 marks) is a structured question based on two source documents. Candidates are required to read
both sources and answer short questions that require candidates to demonstrate AO1 skills.
Question 2 (15 marks) requires a longer response based on one of the source documents. Candidates are required
to focus on the evidence in the document and demonstrate AO1 skills.
Question 3 (25 marks) requires a longer, essay response based on the two source documents. Candidates are
required to focus on the arguments and perspectives given in the documents and provide a reasoned judgement,
demonstrating AO1 and AO3 skills.
Candidates are assessed on their thinking and reasoning skills focused on analysing and evaluating arguments,
interrogating evidence and contexts and comparing perspectives centred on global issues. Candidates are not
assessed on their knowledge and understanding of the specific issues represented in the source material.
In carrying out a critical and comparative analysis of the source material, candidates are assessed on their ability to:
• identify evidence, analyse its strengths and weaknesses and evaluate the evidence (AO1)
• identify and compare key components of arguments (AO1)
• analyse and compare perspectives (AO1)
• evaluate arguments and make judgements about arguments and perspectives (AO1)
• communicate clearly and logically (AO3).
Teachers therefore need to provide opportunities for candidates to practise and develop these skills during the
course. There should be regular opportunities to discuss and debate global issues related to the topics, so that
candidates learn to consider a variety of different perspectives.
Teachers should prepare candidates for the types of questions they are likely to experience in the Written Exam
by using specimen and past papers and their related mark schemes. These can be obtained from the Cambridge
International websites [Link] and [Link]/support
Component 2 – Essay
40 marks, externally marked
Candidates write an essay of 1750–2000 words on a global issue of their own choice from topics studied during the
course.
Candidates must choose an essay title that is a single question. The choice of essay question must provide
opportunities to develop globally contrasting perspectives.
In their research, candidates should identify and explore the context and basis of arguments that respond to the
question from different global perspectives. They should identify globally contrasting perspectives, understand the
arguments, reasoning or claims upon which these perspectives are based and offer a critical view of them. Sources
selected should offer firmly supported judgements or conclusions. Evaluation of sources and perspectives should
form a substantial element of candidates’ essays. Candidates should reach a personal, supported view on the
question.
In the essay, candidates should demonstrate AO1, AO2 and AO3 skills. They will be assessed on their ability to:
• analyse their chosen question (AO1)
• synthesise arguments to build contrasting perspectives (AO1)
• select and refer to a range of sources (AO1)
• assess and justify the appropriateness of the sources selected (AO1)
• compare and evaluate contrasting perspectives (AO1)
• reflect on the impact of alternative perspectives on their viewpoint (AO2)
• suggest further relevant research (AO2)
• write a clear, structured essay using effective referencing (AO3).
The essay must be written in continuous prose and include a list of sources used. Quotations must be fully
referenced. The essay must be 1750–2000 words and an accurate word count must be clearly stated on each essay.
The word count excludes the title, references and citations. Work beyond the 2000 word maximum will not be
marked. The essay must be submitted electronically.
Candidates should be given sufficient time to plan and prepare their research. During this preparation, teachers
should support each candidate to:
• understand the nature of the task
• identify a suitable issue to research
• formulate an appropriate global question
• develop a suitable approach to the research
• develop organisational skills
• cite and reference their sources
• focus on reconstruction and reflection
• write effectively and concisely to stay between 1750 and 2000 words
• include an accurate word count.
continued
Teachers should support candidates in formulating an appropriate global question. The question should:
• be phrased as a question, not as a statement or generic topic area to discuss
• allow for the analysis of at least two globally contrasting perspectives. Questions that focus on an
exclusively local or national issue or perspective are unlikely to be appropriate
• enable candidates to make well-supported judgements
• be about an issue which genuinely interests the candidate.
Further support in formulating appropriate and effective global questions can be found in the online AS course
available on our online Learning Area [Link]
Supervising coursework
A general discussion on the progress of coursework is a natural part of the teacher–candidate relationship, as it is
for other parts of the course. If plans and first drafts are completed under teacher supervision, the teacher can be
sure of the authenticity of the final coursework. Candidates can draft and redraft work, but teachers should only
give brief summative comments on progress during this drafting phase.
Coursework must be a candidate’s own, unaided work. Teachers can support candidates by reviewing their work
before it is handed in for final assessment. You can do this orally or through written feedback. Teachers’ advice
should be kept at a general level so that the candidate leads the discussion and makes the suggestions for any
amendments. Teachers must not give detailed advice to individual candidates or groups of candidates on how
their work can be improved to meet the assessment criteria. You should not correct or edit draft coursework.
For further information about supervising coursework, see the Cambridge Handbook for the relevant year of
assessment at [Link]/eoguide
A candidate taking someone else’s work or ideas and passing them off as his or her own is an example of plagiarism.
Cambridge International use plagiarism detection software packages. It is the teacher’s responsibility to prevent
plagiarism from happening and to detect it if it does happen. For more information, search for ‘Preventing
plagiarism – guidance for teachers’ on our website at [Link]
At the time of submission, the candidate must sign a statement of originality confirming that they are submitting
their own work. The teacher countersigns it to confirm that they believe it is the candidate’s work.
Candidates must work in teams of two to five members to identify a local problem that has global relevance. Each
team works together to identify the problem to research. The team must outline their local problem in a single
statement that allows the team members to address contrasting perspectives on the problem. The scope of the
research should be sufficiently broad to enable teams to explore the problem from local and global perspectives.
Teachers should support teams in formulating an appropriate statement.
Candidates allocate areas for each team member to research. Each team member is expected to argue from their
distinct perspective for an effective and workable solution to the problem.
Each candidate is required to give a presentation about their research and preferred solution. They are also required
to write a reflective paper in which they reflect on the effectiveness of the collaboration undertaken by the team
and on their individual learning. Their learning may be about the problem itself, the research skills they have
developed, and/or presentation skills.
Presentation
30 marks
Each candidate will give a presentation about their research and preferred solution (10 minutes maximum). The
presentation may be either:
• a live recording of the candidate
or
• a presentation with a recorded voiceover by the candidate
Live recording
It is important that the presentation is recorded in one session and in an area that is quiet with no background noise
to ensure what the candidate is saying can be heard.
The presentation should be supported by audio and/or visual materials appropriate to the live presentation and
delivered to an audience. The size of the audience can be determined by the centre but must include at least three
people, one of whom must be the class teacher.
There does not need to be a live audience. Candidates should use language appropriate for the presentation and
sustain the language throughout. The presentation should contain appropriate audio and visual elements.
A presentation (10 minutes maximum) must be submitted for each candidate. Team presentations must not be
submitted for assessment.
Candidates will be assessed on how their presentation displays the following skills:
• individual analysis of the problem identified by the team (AO1)
• range of research undertaken (AO1)
• evaluation of sources (AO1)
• justification for their individual solution (AO1)
• production of a well-argued, well-organised argument (AO3)
• use of visual information (AO3)
• use of language to address the audience. (AO3)
The presentations must be submitted to Cambridge International along with the audio and/or visual materials used
and a verbatim transcript of the presentation. The running time for the presentation must not exceed 10 minutes.
Work beyond the maximum running time will not be included in the assessment. Teachers must ensure that the
quality of any recording will permit accurate marking of the work.
Reflective paper
10 marks
Each candidate will write a reflective paper (maximum 800 words) focusing on how effectively the team worked
together, what could be improved, and any changes to their personal views shaped by the collaborative experience.
Candidates should demonstrate AO2 skills.
For each candidate, submit the following pieces of work to Cambridge International:
1 Recording of the live presentation OR presentation with recorded voiceover
2 Audio and/or visual materials to support a live presentation
3 A transcript of the presentation
4 The reflective paper.
Teachers should note that the use of audio and/or visual materials does not need to be extensive but rather
should be fit for purpose and reflective of working in the twenty-first century.
The presentation and reflective paper must be each candidate’s own, unaided work. Once candidates start
researching and producing their presentations, they may seek assistance from the teacher, but advice should
be kept at a general level so that the candidates lead the discussions and make the suggestions for any
amendments. Teachers must not give detailed advice to individual candidates or groups of candidates on how
their work can be improved to meet the assessment criteria.
There is also an online AS Level course available on our online Learning Area
[Link]
For further information about supervising coursework, see the Cambridge Handbook for the relevant year of
assessment at [Link]/eoguide
A candidate taking someone else’s work or ideas and passing them off as his or her own is an example of plagiarism.
Cambridge International use plagiarism detection software packages. It is the teacher’s responsibility to prevent
plagiarism from happening and to detect it if it does happen. For more information, search for ‘Preventing
plagiarism – guidance for teachers’ on our website at [Link]
At the time of submission, the candidate must sign a statement of originality confirming that they are submitting
their own work. The teacher countersigns it to confirm that they believe it is the candidate’s work.
For the Cambridge Research Report, candidates complete a research project on a topic and question of their own
choice. The project comprises a report of up to 5000 words, supported by a research log.
The report must be based around a single question that lends itself to in-depth research. The report should be
written for a non-specialist audience.
Throughout their research, candidates must keep a research log and submit it with their report. The log must be
a separate document to the report. In their log, candidates should record information relating to the research
process and reflect on their research findings and decisions.
For the Cambridge Research Report, candidates should demonstrate AO1, AO2 and AO3 skills. Candidates will be
assessed on their ability to:
• use a research log to record, plan and reflect on research (AO1, AO2)
• reflect on research findings and decisions (AO2)
• analyse their research question (AO1)
• use appropriate research methods (AO1)
• select and analyse relevant concepts (AO1)
• use and assess sources to support arguments and perspectives (AO1)
• build and compare contrasting perspectives (AO1)
• reflect on how alternative perspectives have influenced their argument (AO2)
• make judgements which are supported by evidence (AO1)
• reflect on their conclusions (AO2)
• structure their report effectively, use accurate terminology and use complete and appropriate citation and
referencing (AO3).
The report must be written in continuous prose and must not exceed 5000 words. An accurate word count must be
clearly stated. The title and bibliographical references are not included in the word count. Work beyond the 5000
word maximum will not be marked.
The report must include a bibliography and full bibliographical references must be given for any quotations. The
format and referencing conventions used should be appropriate to the subject discipline/s.
Each candidate must also complete a research proposal form, and this must be reviewed internally. The research
proposal is not externally marked by Cambridge International, but it must be submitted with the materials sent for
assessment. For further guidance, see the section ‘Initial preparation and research proposal’ below.
The teacher must review the research proposal to confirm whether the concepts and debate are relevant and that
the research question chosen gives the candidate scope to meet the assessment criteria.
The title of the report must take the form of a question. Formulating a good research question takes time and
careful consideration. The report should explain how and why the question was developed. For example, why is the
question worth asking, and how did it develop during the research process?
Candidates should also consider the key concepts associated with their research question and area of research. The
key concepts are the terms or ideas which are relevant to the topic they have chosen. For example, for a project
on the representation of women in poetry, key concepts might be gender and feminism. Or, for a project which
investigates different explanations for the movement of fluids in science, key concepts might be the conservation
of energy and Brownian motion.
Candidates must discuss their research proposal with their teacher, to ensure that their research question,
concepts, initial thoughts on how they intend to argue for or against the question, and sources are appropriate.
Teachers should support candidates in developing their ideas and approve the research proposal form.
Download the research proposal form from the samples database at [Link]/samples.
For each candidate, a completed research proposal form, with comments from the teacher, must be submitted to
Cambridge International along with the materials for assessment.
For further guidance on the initial preparation and the research proposal, see the Teacher Guide or go to our School
Support Hub [Link]/support
The teacher will need to help each candidate to decide on the subject and scale of their research. The teacher
must review the research proposal to confirm the topic is suitable and provides enough opportunities to meet
the assessment criteria but is not too large, nor too complex. In the initial stage when topics are being selected,
teachers might arrange workshops for candidates to discuss subject specific issues and approaches. As topics are
refined and questions developed, workshops might also be used to share ideas.
The teacher is responsible for formally approving each candidate’s research proposal. Teachers should do this
before the candidate starts work on their research. Teachers should be satisfied that the research does not
raise safety issues for the candidates. Information on safeguarding is available in the Our standards section of
our public website. We recommend that teachers read the booklet Safeguarding: The Protection of Children and
Vulnerable Adults.
Throughout the research process the teacher should support each candidate to:
• identify an appropriate topic and develop a suitable research question
• consider alternative perspectives on the question
• consider whether enough evidence exists in relation to the topic and question
• select research methods that are appropriate for the project
• consider research ethics and conventions in relation to specific research questions
• consider the timescale and overall planning
• keep a research log.
Research must be the candidate’s own unaided work and findings must be the result of personal reflection and
judgement. The work may be supported by ongoing workshops and classes. Candidates may also consult with
a subject-specific teacher if they are carrying out research into a specialist topic. However, the report needs to
address a non-specialist audience. Teachers should monitor candidates’ progress by discussion of their research
log. It is a teacher’s responsibility to verify that the work is that of the candidate working alone.
Evidence
The research report must be evidence-based. Evidence is likely to be primary evidence and/or secondary evidence.
Primary evidence is first-hand information and can come from a range of sources, such as historical documents,
literary texts, artefacts and data gathered from scientific observation, as well as interviews and surveys. Secondary
evidence includes material such as the arguments and opinions of specialists which reflect on or synthesise primary
evidence. Candidates should be aware of and explore the strengths and potential weaknesses of all types of
evidence.
The study of the reasons why particular sets of methods are appropriate for specific academic subject areas is
known as research methodology. Candidates are expected to engage with the methodology underlying their choice
of research methods, and consider the impact of their choice on their report.
In their research report, candidates must explain their choice and use of appropriate research methods, and
consider the methodology which has informed this. Candidates should explain how they carried out the research.
Research log
Candidates must use a research log throughout the research process to record information, plan actions and reflect
on research findings and decisions. Decisions could include the wording of their research question, their choice of
methods, and judgements made during the research based on their findings. Candidates do not need to record all
their actions and thinking in their log. The log could contain reminders of things to check, ongoing evaluation of the
research, and reflections on how their thinking or their research question may have changed as a result of feedback
from the teacher.
The log must be submitted for assessment and must be a separate document to the report. It can be written in note
form or a mixture of notes and continuous prose. The log is not included in the 5000 word limit of the report but it
should not be seen as a way to extend that word limit.
For further guidance on the log, including length and format, see the Teacher Guide.
Perspectives
A candidate’s research question should lead to the discussion of different perspectives. A perspective is a coherent
world view which is a response to an issue. A perspective is made up of argument, evidence and assumptions, and
may be influenced by a particular context. It should be clear from the research question that it will be possible to
analyse and evaluate different perspectives.
For example, a candidate may want to choose industrialisation as their research topic. There are different opinions
about industrialisation. Some argue in favour of industrialisation because industrial production can manufacture
goods more efficiently. However, others argue against it because of the pollution it generates. Each of these views
can be supported by different kinds of evidence. The argument for industrialisation based on its efficiency might be
backed up by quantitative evidence of rates of production and profitability. The arguments against industrialisation
because of the pollution it causes, might be supported by observational evidence of its impact on the natural
environment. Each of these views also make different assumptions: unstated reasons which lead them to value
different kinds of evidence and come to different conclusions. In each case, the combination of the arguments,
evidence and assumptions makes up a distinctive perspective. A judgement between them can, however, be
reached by the careful and sympathetic evaluation of the differing yet well-established views.
The research question should lead directly to an assessment of the perspectives. It would not be suitable for a
research question to be simply ‘Industrialisation’ because that is a not a question. The title ‘Has industrialisation
been environmentally damaging?’ is a question, but it would not be suitable because it suggests a one-sided,
preconceived view and does not lead directly to a debate. However, an appropriate question and report title would
be ‘Is industrialisation a good thing?’, because this question could lead to establishing and evaluating different
perspectives.
Candidates must acknowledge where specific ideas and information come from. They should use an appropriate
referencing and citation system related to the academic discipline in which they are working. Many reports will
adopt the Harvard, Chicago or APA referencing systems. Whatever referencing system candidates choose, they
must use it consistently.
Candidates must not submit someone else’s work as their own, or use material produced by someone else without
citing and referencing it properly. Teachers should make candidates aware of the academic conventions governing
quotation and reference to the work of others and teach candidates how to use them.
A candidate taking someone else’s work or ideas and passing them off as his or her own is an example of plagiarism.
Cambridge International use plagiarism detection software packages. It is the teacher’s responsibility to prevent
plagiarism from happening in the first place, and to detect it if it does happen. For more information, search for
‘Preventing plagiarism – guidance for teachers’ on our website at [Link]
At the time of submission, the candidate must sign a statement of originality confirming that they are submitting
their own work. The teacher countersigns it to confirm that they believe it is the candidate’s work.
The deadlines and methods for submission are given in the Administrative Guide. This is available from the Exams
Officers’ Guide section of our website: [Link]/eoguide
For each candidate, submit the following pieces of work to Cambridge International:
1 Cambridge Research Report
2 Research log
3 Research proposal form.
Command words
Command words and their meanings help candidates know what is expected from them in the exam. The table
below includes command words used in the assessment for this syllabus. The use of the command word will relate
to the subject context.
Develop take forward to a more advanced stage or build upon given information
Explain set out purposes or reasons / make the relationships between things evident / provide
why and/or how and support with relevant evidence
Identify name/select/recognise
Phrases such as ‘To what extent …?’ and ‘Make an overall judgement’ may also be seen in the assessment for this
syllabus.
This section is an overview of other information you need to know about this syllabus. It will help to share the
administrative information with your exams officer so they know when you will need their support. Find more
information about our administrative processes at [Link]/eoguide
You can view the timetable for your administrative zone at [Link]/timetables
You can enter candidates in the June and November exam series. If your school is in India, you can also enter your
candidates in the March exam series.
Check you are using the syllabus for the year the candidate is taking the exam.
Private candidates cannot enter for this syllabus. For more information, please refer to the Cambridge Guide to
Making Entries.
Making entries
Exams officers are responsible for submitting entries to Cambridge International. We encourage them to work
closely with you to make sure they enter the right number of candidates for the right combination of syllabus
components. Entry option codes and instructions for submitting entries are in the Cambridge Guide to Making
Entries. Your exams officer has a copy of this guide.
Exam administration
To keep our exams secure, we produce question papers for different areas of the world, known as administrative
zones. We allocate all Cambridge schools to one administrative zone determined by their location. Each zone has
a specific timetable. Some of our syllabuses offer candidates different assessment options. An entry option code
is used to identify the components the candidate will take relevant to the administrative zone and the available
assessment options.
Candidates can carry forward the result of their Cambridge International AS Level assessment from one series to
complete the Cambridge International A Level in a following series, subject to the rules and time limits described in
the Cambridge Handbook.
Regulations for carrying forward entries for staged assessment (Cambridge International AS & A Level) can be found
in the Cambridge Handbook for the relevant year of assessment at [Link]/eoguide
Marks achieved in Component 3, Team Project, can be carried forward on their own to future series, subject to the
requirements set out in the Cambridge Handbook. This can be done by making entries for either of the following
options:
• AS Level only awarding: the AS Level entry option, where components 1 and 2 are taken and the marks of
Component 3 have been carried forward.
or
• A Level awarding: the A Level entry option, where components 1, 2 and 4 are taken and the marks of
Component 3 have been carried forward.
The marks from the specific entry options listed above cannot be used as a staged route to complete a full A Level.
For information, refer to the Cambridge Handbook for the relevant year of assessment at
[Link]/eoguide
The standard assessment arrangements may present barriers for candidates with impairments. Where a candidate
is eligible, we may be able to make arrangements to enable that candidate to access assessments and receive
recognition of their attainment. We do not agree access arrangements if they give candidates an unfair advantage
over others or if they compromise the standards being assessed.
Language
This syllabus and the related assessment materials are available in English only.
Grades a, b, c, d or e indicate the standard a candidate achieved at Cambridge International AS Level. ‘a’ is the
highest and ‘e’ is the lowest grade.
‘Ungraded’ means that the candidate’s performance did not meet the standard required for the lowest grade
(E or e). ‘Ungraded’ is reported on the statement of results but not on the certificate. In specific circumstances
your candidates may see one of the following letters on their statement of results:
• Q (PENDING)
• X (NO RESULT).
If a candidate takes a Cambridge International A Level and fails to achieve grade E or higher, a Cambridge
International AS Level grade will be awarded if both of the following apply:
• the components taken for the Cambridge International A Level by the candidate in that series included all the
components making up a Cambridge International AS Level
• the candidate’s performance on the AS Level components was sufficient to merit the award of a Cambridge
International AS Level grade.
On the statement of results and certificates, Cambridge International AS & A Levels are shown as General
Certificates of Education, GCE Advanced Subsidiary Level (GCE AS Level) and GCE Advanced Level (GCE A Level).
‘Cambridge International A Levels are the ‘gold standard’ qualification. They are based on
rigorous, academic syllabuses that are accessible to students from a wide range of abilities yet
have the capacity to stretch our most able.’
Director of Studies, Auckland Grammar School, New Zealand
How students, teachers and higher education can use the grades
Cambridge International A Level
Assessment at Cambridge International A Level has two purposes:
• to measure learning and achievement
The assessment:
– confirms achievement and performance in relation to the knowledge, understanding and skills specified in
the syllabus.
Grade descriptions
Grade descriptions are provided to give an indication of the standards of achievement candidates awarded
particular grades are likely to show. Weakness in one aspect of the examination may be balanced by a better
performance in some other aspect.
Grade descriptions for Cambridge International A Level Global Perspectives & Research will be published after the
first assessment of the A Level in 2023. Find more information at [Link]/alevel
You must read the whole syllabus before planning your teaching programme.
Changes to syllabus • Small-scale changes to the Approaches to teaching and learning section:
content – definition of key terms has been clarified
– list of global topics has been updated.
• The learner attributes have been updated.
• A glossary of standard command words has been added.
Changes to assessment • The aims and assessment objectives have been updated:
(including changes to – collaboration is no longer part of AO3. AO3 is now called
specimen papers) ‘Communication’
– reflection on the effectiveness of collaboration is now part of AO2.
• The number of marks for components has increased.
• The weighting of assessment objectives has changed:
– less emphasis on AO1
– more emphasis on AO3 in Component 3
– more emphasis on AO2 in Component 4.
• The weighting of components has changed: Component 1 is now slightly
more heavily weighted in the AS Level.
• In Component 1, candidates now need to read both source texts for
Question 1.
• Component 3:
– candidates now have an option to deliver either a live presentation to an
audience, or a presentation with a recorded voiceover by the candidate
– maximum length of the presentation has been increased to 10 minutes
– candidates are now assessed on reflection and evaluation of the
effectiveness of collaboration with others
– the reference to being innovative has been removed
– candidates no longer need to identify and describe a team solution.
• Component 4:
– research reports are now externally assessed, with separate marks for
the research log and the research report
– the oral explanation and justification (viva) of the research report has
been discontinued
– the Outline Proposal Form has been discontinued
– candidates must submit a research proposal form at the same time as
the research report and log.
• The mark schemes have been revised for all components.
In addition to reading the syllabus, you should refer to the updated specimen papers. The specimen papers will help
your students become familiar with exam requirements and command words in questions. The specimen mark
schemes explain how students should answer questions to meet the assessment objectives.
Any textbooks endorsed to support the syllabus for examination from 2023 are suitable for use with
this syllabus.