Understanding Predetermined Time Systems
Understanding Predetermined Time Systems
In MTM-1, 'Move' is determined by its purpose of transporting an object, considering factors like the length, destination nature, move type, and the object's weight. It's classified into three types (A, B, C) based on accuracy and contact nature . 'Reach', however, involves moving an empty hand or finger to a destination and is determined by the motion's length and destination conditions, divided into five classes based on complexity and precision . These distinctions highlight 'Move' involving load and transport accuracy as opposed to 'Reach' which focuses on precision and searching in empty hand movements.
The development of MTM-2 and MTM-3 significantly streamlined the application of predetermined time systems in industrial work by reducing complexity and analysis time. MTM-2 combines basic motions into nine categories, reducing time analysis to about 100 times the cycle time, which makes it more applicable for less repetitive, lengthy tasks compared to the intricate MTM-1 . MTM-3 further distills this system into four categories, offering a sevenfold speed increase in analysis time over MTM-1, which summarizes broader movements suitable for long-cycle operations . This development implies a broader applicability of MTM systems, enabling more industries to implement efficient time management strategies without the detailed granularity and time expenditure required by MTM-1, thereby enhancing productivity and flexibility in various industrial applications.
MTM-2 and MTM-3 were created to reduce the extensive time required for task analysis in MTM-1, which requires about 250 times the cycle time. MTM-2, requiring about 100 times the cycle time, was designed for less repetitive and longer tasks, offering a condensed set of motion categories by combining basic MTM-1 motions . MTM-3 further decreases analysis time by adopting four broad motion categories, ideal for long-cycle, short-run operations . The creation of these systems aimed to increase efficiency and applicability across varied industrial operations where the extensive detail of MTM-1 was unnecessary.
Combining motion categories in MTM-2 (e.g., Get and Put) and MTM-3 (e.g., Handle and Transport) implies a more streamlined approach suitable for industries prioritizing efficiency over precision. MTM-2 and MTM-3 cater to tasks with moderate to minimal repetitiveness, providing quicker analysis as these systems condense multiple motions, reducing the need for extensive, detailed breakdowns . While precise timing for each motion is sacrificed, this approach accommodates industries needing fast deployment and analysis, trading off some detail for overall process speed and adaptability, thus broadening their applicability in dynamic, less precision-oriented environments.
MTM-1 is the most detailed system, breaking down motions into ten categories and requiring extensive analysis time, approximately 250 times the cycle time, making it suitable for highly repetitive and intricate tasks . MTM-2, developed to reduce analysis time to about 100 times the cycle time, combines basic motions from MTM-1 into nine categories with reduced variability, making it ideal for tasks not highly repetitive and longer than one minute . MTM-3 simplifies further into four broader motion categories, handles tasks with less precision, but is seven times faster in analysis than MTM-1 and three times faster than MTM-2, suitable for long-cycle, short-run operations . These differences affect their industrial application based on the complexity and repetitiveness of the tasks, with MTM-1 used for highly detailed work and MTM-3 for broader, less detail-oriented operations.
MTM-1 ensures accuracy in its analysis by dissecting manual operations into ten detailed categories of motion, each considered with factors like motion length, object interaction, and precision required, with time measured in Time Measurement Units (TMUs). This granularity allows comprehensive time allocation and efficiency assessments. However, such precision necessitates extensive analysis time (250 times the cycle time), posing potential limitations in rapidly changing environments where speed and adaptability are prioritized over meticulous detail, possibly reducing its practicality for industrial sectors needing swift and flexible operational implementations .
In MTM-1, 'Reach' is classified into five classes (A, B, C, D, E) based on destination stability and accuracy requirements. Class A reaches to objects in a fixed location, Class B to objects with slight location variation, Class C involves searching and selecting among objects, Class D requires high accuracy for small objects, and Class E involves reaching to indefinite locations for balance or positioning . This classification is significant as it allows for precise time allocation based on the complexity and accuracy of the reach, optimizing task performance and time efficiency in industrial settings by tailoring the analysis to specific task requirements.
The 'Grasp' element in MTM-1 functions to gain control over objects, typically preceding a 'Move' action. It's categorized into types like Pick-up, Regrasp, Transfer, Select, and Contact, characterizing the action involved . Being a precursor to moving objects, it is critical for analyzing task performance as it delineates control acquisition, influencing the subsequent motion's efficiency and accuracy. This precision in analysis ensures tasks are sufficiently timed for ergonomic control which is paramount in an assembly or production environment.
In MTM systems, 'Eye Motions' are considered crucial as they direct hand or body movements during task performance. In MTM-1, they are quantified into Eye Focus Time, which is the time required to focus on an object, and Eye Travel Time, which is influenced by the distance between points the eyes travel and their perpendicular distance from the line of travel . This quantification in MTM-1 is unique as it integrates eye activity into the workflow analysis, ensuring tasks involving visual engagement are accurately timed and assessed.
In MTM-1, 'Position' is classified as a unique basic element employed to align or engage objects where minor motions are involved, unlike other elements that signify significant movement. Its categorization is influenced by the class of fit (loose, close, exact), symmetry (symmetrical, non-symmetrical, semi-symmetrical), and ease of handling, which dictate the complexity of the positioning action . These factors ensure 'Position' is accurately timed based on the task's precision and handling requirements, allowing efficient allocation of time resources in detailed work tasks.