AMITY LAW SCHOOL

SOCIO ECONOMIC OFFENCES ASSIGNMENT

Ensuring Justice: The Importance of Properly Recording a Child’s

Testimony under the POCSO Act, 2012

SUBMITTED TO: SUBMITTED BY:

MS. AVNI SINGH SOLANKI RITESH DHYANI

VISITING FACULTY COURSE: BA LLB(H)

SOCIO ECONOMIC OFFENCES SEMESTER: 7TH

ALS – AUR ENROLLMENT: A21511120071

 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I would like to express my sincere thanks and gratitude to Ms. Avni Singh
Solanki, ma’am for giving me such an opportunity to work on this project. I am
very grateful to her for her guidance and support in completion of this project.

DATE: RITESH DHYANI

28/10/2023 BA LLB (H.) 7th Sem

Ensuring Justice: The Importance of Properly Recording a Child’s Testimony
under the POCSO Act, 2012

Abstract:
In this article, I will be dealing with the critical significance of a child's testimony in cases
involving child sexual abuse under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO)
Act, 2012 (hereinafter will be referred as ‘the Act’). I’ll be highlighting the profound
implications of these testimonies in ensuring justice for young victims.
The article ultimately asserts that a thorough and legally sound record of a child's testimony is
not only pivotal for securing convictions but also for safeguarding the child's well-being
throughout the legal process.
This article will make an attempt to delineate all important aspects pertaining to examination
of child witnesses in court. Focus will be specifically on judicial precedents, in the form of
guidelines and directions given by courts to examine child witnesses.
Keywords: Child, justice, testimony, victim.
Issue-
Child victim of a sexual crime carries a huge burden of guilt, shame and humiliation, which
gets aggravated when he/she is required to recount the violation to strangers in outside world.
The trauma of a child victim is only multiplied as he/she is required to repeatedly recapitulate
her ordeal to the investigating agencies, prosecutors and then in court.
A child witness is to be treated with special care not only on point of reliability but also on the
need for a special procedure when a child witness is testifying. Provisions under the POCSO
Act, which lay down the procedure of conducting a child’s testimony take into consideration
the special needs of a child. To smoothen the child’s experience and journey through the
criminal justice system, Sections 24, 25, 26, 33, 36 and 37 of the Act (refer the Act) gain
significance while dealing with child witnesses.
The Supreme Court and High Courts have laid down guidelines to ensure that during criminal
trial the child’s rights and interests are safeguarded and protected. Lack of proper
implementation of such guidelines, and absence of adequate safeguards during proceedings,
have continued to create impediments for children and their families during their testimony in
court.

Points for Consideration-

• Competency of a child witness to testify;
• Whether the statement of a child witness is worthy of credence;
• Whether the sole evidence of a child can be the basis for conviction;
• Guidelines on how to examine a child witness (International and domestic legal
framework);

1. Competency of a child witness to testify-

As a general rule, Section 118 of The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA) states that “All
persons shall be competent to testify unless the Court considers that they are prevented from
understanding the questions put to them, by tender years, extreme old age, disease, whether of
body or mind, or any other cause of the same kind.” It also explains that a lunatic 54 is not
incompetent to testify, unless he is prevented by his lunacy from understanding the questions
put to him and giving rational answers to them.
The Act does not stipulate any minimum age for the purpose of deposition – the court is
required to ascertain whether a particular child is competent to depose, and such
competence may differ from child to child.
On the question of competency of a child to testify as a witness, the Delhi High Court in
Virender v. The State of NCT of Delhi,1 stated that the courts in India have relied on the
proposition formulated by Justice Brewer in Wheeler v. United States, 159 US 523 (1895). In
the said case, it was opined that the evidence of a child witness cannot be rejected per se, but
the courts, as a rule of prudence, should consider such evidence with close scrutiny and only
1
Crl. A. No. 121/2008.
on being convinced about the reliability and quality thereof can record the said child’s
statement.
Further, referring to the Supreme Court case of Panchhi v. State of U.P.,2 the court in Virender
v. The State of NCT of Delhi (supra) stated that ‘the reservation expressed with regard to
evaluating the testimony of a witness is based on apprehensions that children may be vulnerable
and susceptible to be swayed by what others say and the child witness is an easy prey to
tutoring, and therefore, their evidence must be evaluated carefully and with greater
circumspection’.

2. Whether the statement of a child witness is worthy of credence?

In Panchhi v. State of U.P.,3 the Supreme Court observed that, if satisfied that the testimony
of the child witness is a voluntary expression of what transpired and is an accurate impression
of the same, no corroboration of the testimony is required.
In Moti Lal v. State of U.P.,4 the Supreme Court reiterated the well settled principle that even
if the doctor who examined the victim does not find any sign of rape, it is no ground to
disbelieve the sole testimony of the prosecutrix if it inspires confidence.
In State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh,5 it was held that a conviction can be founded on the
testimony of the victim alone unless there are compelling reasons for seeking corroboration.

3. Whether the sole evidence of a child can be the basis for conviction?
The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the testimony of a child can be the sole basis
for conviction in a case. The Court has consistently held that the rule of corroboration is
only a rule of caution and prudence, and does not need to be followed in every case.
The Supreme Court in the case of Dattu Ramrao Sakhare v. State of Maharashtra,6 held
that:
“6. ...A child witness if found competent to depose to the facts and reliable one such evidence
could be the basis of conviction. In other words, even in the absence of oath the evidence of a
child witness can be considered under Section 118 of the Evidence Act provided that such
witness is able to understand the questions and able to give rational answers thereof. The
evidence of a child witness and credibility thereof would depend upon the circumstances of
each case. The only precaution which the court should bear in mind while assessing the
evidence of a child witness is that the witness must be reliable one and his/her demeanour must
be like any other competent witness and there is no likelihood of being tutored”.

2
AIR 1998 SC 2726.
3
Id.
4
JT 2008 8 SCC 271.
5
1996 [Link] 1728 SC.
6
1997 5 SCC 341.
Even while acquitting the appellant on the grounds that the evidence of the prosecutrix was full
of discrepancies and did not inspire confidence, the Supreme Court in Radhu v. State of
Madhya Pradesh,7 held that:
“5. It is now well settled that a finding of guilt in a case of rape, can be based on the
uncorroborated evidence of the prosecutrix. The very nature of offence makes it difficult Things
to remember… A child against whom a sexual offence has been committed is a crucial
prosecution witness and the success or failure of the prosecution’s case depends on his/her
evidence. Over the years both the Supreme Court of India and various High Courts have
established the importance of victim’s testimony and clearly stated that conviction can be based
on a consistent and reliable testimony of a competent witness. 59 to get direct corroborating
evidence. The evidence of the prosecutrix should not be rejected on the basis of minor
discrepancies and contradictions. …Whether there was rape or not would depend ultimately
on the facts and circumstances of each case”.
In Suryanarayana v. State of Karnataka,8 the Supreme Court held that if upon examination
and scrutiny, if the court is satisfied that the evidence is reliable and not tutored, the court
can secure the conviction of the accused based solely upon the child’s testimony. Further,
it stated that corroboration is not a rule but a matter of prudence, and minor discrepancies and
inconsistencies are not a basis for disregarding the testimony of the child.

4. Guidelines on how to examine a child witness-

4.1. International Legal Framework:

Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948, Article 25,9 provides that children as a
category need special care and assistance. Alongside this there is ‘UN Guidelines on Justice in
matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime, 2005’,10 which prescribes for special
protection, assistance and age-appropriate support to prevent further hardship and trauma for
child witnesses.
Elaborating on the UN Guidelines, the Delhi High Court in State v. Sujeet Kumar,11 states the
follows:
“48. …The UN guidelines prescribe that the children are particularly vulnerable and need
special protection, assistance and support appropriate to their age, level of maturity and
unique needs in order to prevent further hardship and trauma that may result from their
participation in the criminal justice process. The UN guidelines further prescribe that female
child witness is more vulnerable than the male child witness and may face discrimination at all

7
Appeal (Crl.) 624 of 2005.
8
(2001) 9 SCC 129.
9
[Link]
rights#:~:text=Article%2025&text=All%20children%2C%20whether%20born%20in,enjoy%20the%20same%20s
ocial%20protection.
10
[Link]
11
213 (2014) DLT 635.
stages of the justice system. The UN guidelines stresses the importance of ensuring dignity and
physical, mental and moral integrity of the child witness; the justice process should be sensitive
to child's age, wishes, understanding, gender, sexual orientation, ethic, cultural, religious,
linguistic and social background, caste, socioeconomic condition as well as special needs of
the child including health, ability and capacities”

4.2. Domestic Legal Framework:

In Para 49 of State v. Sujeet Kumar,12 the Delhi High Court listed the difficulties faced while
assessing the competence of a child witness. Recognising that it is not an easy task, the court
has listed several factors to be taken into consideration:
• the environment of court which is intended to be imposing,
• presence of accused,
• child’s worry about being not believed while testifying,
• general public getting to know about the incident,
• child worrying about mixing up facts or forgetting things while testifying,
• embarrassment in sharing details of the incident,
• child worrying about the repercussions and retaliation by or against her/his family,
• children may have different understanding from adults as to meaning of a word, lesser
accuracy in terms of time, distance etc.

The Delhi High Court in the case of State v. Rahul,13 examined the general principles which
govern a competency examination of the child witness before the court and also referred to the
judgment from other countries to highlight the importance and precautions to be taken at the
time of recording child’s testimony.
“…. It is essential to note that all these concerns apply to all stages of a child witness court
appearance including the competency examination of the child and evaluation of her/his
response thereto. We cannot emphasize enough that the legislation, the statutory
requirements as well as the jurisprudence on the subject have kept the best interest of the
child as the complete focus of every action, especially Court proceedings and the decision.
This aspect cannot be compromised in any manner. The matter assumes even greater
importance in cases involving the sexual offences and abuse of the child as in the present case.”

12
Id.
13
CR.L.P. 250/2012.
Conclusion-
In the pursuit of justice for child victims of sexual abuse, the meticulous recording of their
testimonies under the Act stands as a linchpin of the legal process. This article has centered on
the pivotal role played by judicial precedents in shaping the contours of this process.
Furthermore, these precedents signal a growing societal awareness of the unique challenges
faced by child victims. They reflect a shift toward viewing discrepancies in a child's testimony
through a lens of understanding, acknowledging the profound impact of trauma on a child's
memory and expression.
In conclusion, these precedents, continually evolving, guide us toward a more compassionate,
equitable, and empathetic legal system, ensuring that justice not only prevails but also
prioritizes the best interests of the child.