APPENDICES
Statistical Treatment of Data………………………………………………………………..
Chapter 4……………………………………………………………………………………………
A. Profile of the Participants…………………………………………………………..
B. Communicative Competence of the Participants…………………………..
C. Learning Competencies……………………………………………………………..
D. Questionnaire…………………………………………………………………………..
Statistical Treatment of Data
The researcher used the following statistical tools to analyze and give meaning
to the meaningless numbers, thereby breathing life into lifeless data.
Frequency Distribution. Frequency is the number of occurrences of a
repeating event per unit time. This distribution was used in the profile of the
participants in terms of Gender, Major, and General Weighted Average.
Percentage Distribution. Percentage is the ratio of a portion of a number
over the total items multiplied by 100. In general, it is a display of data that
indicates the percentage of observations for each data point or grouping of data
points. In this study, percentage distribution was employed to determine the profile
of the participants in terms of Gender, Major, and General Weighted Average.
Standard Deviation. A standard deviation (or σ) is a measure of how
dispersed the data is in relation to the mean. Low standard deviation means data
are clustered around the mean.
Weighted Mean. This statistical method calculates the average by
multiplying the weights with their respective mean and taking its sum. It is a type of
average in which weights assign individual values to determine the relative
importance of each observation. This was utilized in this study to measure the
Communicative Competencies and Learning Competencies of 3rd year students in
the College of Education.
Profile of the Participants
Table 1 presents the participants’ profile in terms of gender and major.
Gender. There were 100 participants of the study. Of the 100 participants,
50% were males and 50% also were females.
Major. In terms of majors, the same number 20 or 20% were taken as
participants’ majoring in English, General Science, Social Science, Mathematics and
Physical Education.
Table 1. Profile of the Participants
Profile F %
(N = 100)
Gender
Male 50 50.0
Female 50 50.0
Major
English 20 20.0
General Science 20 20.0
Social Science 20 20.0
Mathematics 20 20.0
Physical Education 20 20.0
Communicative Competence of the Participants
Shown in Table 2 is the communicative competence of the participants in
terms of linguistics, socio-linguistics, discourse and strategic competence.
Table 2. Communicative Competence of the Participants
The table above indicates that 18.8 % have chosen Strongly Agree that they
feel confident in using the English Language, while 52.1 % answered Agree. 20.8 % of
the remaining chose Undecided and the remaining 8.3 % chose to answer Disagree.
The second section of the questionnaire sought to identify the Sociolinguistic
Competence of the third year students. The responses to the questions for the second
variable are summarized in the tables below.
4.2 B. Sociolinguistic Competence
I can only talk about certain topics.
VARIABLE PERCENTAGE
Strongly Agree 14.6 %
Agree 54.2 %
Undecided 20.8 %
Disagree 8.3 %
Strongly Disagree 2.1 %
Total: 100 %
The table shows 14.6 of the third year students chose Strongly Agree. 54.2 %
Agree that they talk only about certain topics. The 20.8 % have chosen to become
Undecided while 8.3 % Disagree. The remaining 2.1 % answered Strongly Disagree.
I can express my preference in various matters.
VARIABLE PERCENTAGE
Strongly Agree 22.9 %
Agree 58.3 %
Undecided 16.7 %
Disagree 2.1 %
Strongly Disagree 0%
Total: 100 %
This table shows that, 22. 9 % Strongly Agree that they can express
preferences in various matters. On the other hand, 58.3 % Agree, while 16.7 % chose
to answer Undecided. The remaining 2.1% have answered Disagree.
I can voice out my opinion.
VARIABLE PERCENTAGE
Strongly Agree 22.9 %
Agree 45.8 %
Undecided 20.8 %
Disagree 10.4 %
Strongly Disagree 0%
Total: 100 %
This table shows that 22.9 % answered Strongly Agree that they can voice out
their opinion while, 45.8 % Agree. 20.8 % for the Undecided and 10.4 % chose to
Disagree.
The third section of the questionnaire sought to identify the Discourse
Competence of the third year students. The responses to the questions for the third
variable are summarized in the tables below.
4.3. Discourse Competence
I am always prepared to speak in class.
VARIABLE PERCENTAGE
Strongly Agree 14.6 %
Agree 37. 5 %
Undecided 27.1 %
Disagree 16.7 %
Strongly Disagree 4.1 %
Total: 100 %
This table shows that 14.6 % Strongly Agree that they are always prepared to
speak in class. 37.5 % answered Agree while 27.1 chose to answer Undecided. 16.7 %
Disagree and 4.1 % Disagree.
I am always confident when there is a speaking task.
VARIABLE PERCENTAGE
Strongly Agree 18.8 %
Agree 25 %
Undecided 27.1 %
Disagree 20.8 %
Strongly Disagree 8.3 %
Total: 100 %
This table shows that 18.8 % answered Strongly Agree, 25% answered agree
while 27.1% of the Students answered that they are confident in speaking tasks. 27.1
were Undecided, while 20.8% answered Disagree, and the remaining 8.3 answered
Strongly Disagree.
I prefer not to speak because I don’t have the courage.
VARIABLE PERCENTAGE
Strongly Agree 22.9 %
Agree 27.1 %
Undecided 16.7 %
Disagree 27.1 %
Strongly Disagree 6.3 %
Total: 100 %
The table above shows that both 27.1% of the students answered Agree and
Disagree. 22.9% answered Strongly Agree while 16.7% answered Undecided and the
remaining 6.3% answered Strongly Disagree as they don’t have the courage to speak.
The fourth section of the questionnaire sought to identify the Strategic
Competence of the third year students. The responses to the questions for the fourth
variable are summarized in the tables below.
4.4 Strategic Competence
I am able to observe the learning procedure in class.
VARIABLE PERCENTAGE
Strongly Agree 31.3 %
Agree 60.4 %
Undecided 8.3%
Disagree 0 %
Strongly Disagree 0 %
Total: 100 %
This table shows that 60.4% of the students answered Agree while 31.3%
Strongly Agree and the remaining 8.3% answered Undecided as to whether the
students were able to observe the learning procedures in class.
I participate in class discussions and tasks.
VARIABLE PERCENTAGE
Strongly Agree 25 %
Agree 56.3 %
Undecided 10.4 %
Disagree 8.3 %
Strongly Disagree 0 %
Total: 100 %
The table above shows that in participation in class discussions and tasks, 25%
chose to answer Strongly Agree, 56.3 % Agree. 10.4 % have answered Undecided and
8.3 % chose to Disagree.
I am able to connect my learning in class, in-real life situations.
VARIABLE PERCENTAGE
Strongly Agree 35.4 %
Agree 5o %
Undecided 14.6 %
Disagree 0 %
Strongly Disagree 0 %
Total: 100 %
The table shows that 50% of the students answered Agree while 35.4%
answered Strongly Agree and the remaining 14.6% answered Undecided in
connecting their learning in class in real life situations.
4.5 Learning Competencies
Observation
The fifth section of the questionnaire sought to identify the Strategic
Competence of the third year students. The responses to the questions for the fifth
variable are summarized in the tables below.
Carefully observe a situation in the classroom
VARIABLE PERCENTAGE
Novice 0 %
Advance Beginner 29.2 %
Competent Performer 35.4 %
Proficient Performer 20.8 %
Expert 10.4 %
Total: 100 %
The table above shows that in carefully observed situations in the classroom,
35.4% chose to answer Competent Performer 29.2% Advanced Beginner. While
20.8 % have answered Proficient Performer and 10 % chose to answer Expert.
Display such a situation as a rich picture
VARIABLE PERCENTAGE
Novice 8.3 %
Advance Beginner 37.5 %
Competent Performer 41.7 %
Proficient Performer 8.3 %
Expert 0. %
Total: 100 %
The table above shows that 41.7% answered Competent Performer while
37.5% answered Advanced Beginner and both 8.3% of the students answered Novice
and Proficient Performer in displaying situations as a rich picture.
Allow for examination of the whole situations before drawing conclusion
VARIABLE PERCENTAGE
Novice 12.5 %
Advance Beginner 29.2 %
Competent Performer 41.7 %
Proficient Performer 0 %
Expert 10.4 %
Total: 100 %
This table shows that, 41. 7 % answered Competent Performers as they allow
examinations in a whole situation before drawing conclusions. On the other hand,
29.2 % Advanced Beginner while 12.5 % chose to answer Novice The remaining
10.4% answered Expert.
Participation
Recognize values and goal conflicts of different students in the classroom
VARIABLE PERCENTAGE
Novice 0%
Advance Beginner 27.1 %
Competent Performer 41.7 %
Proficient Performer 14.6 %
Expert 12.5%
Total: 100 %
The table above indicates that 41.7 % have chosen Competent Performer as
they recognize the values and goal conflicts of different students in the classroom
while 27.1 % answered Advance Beginner. 14.6 % of the remaining chose Proficient
Performer and a remaining 12.5 % chose to answer Expert.
Participate in class activities with commitment and dedication
VARIABLE PERCENTAGE
Novice 6.3 %
Advance Beginner 27.1 %
Competent Performer 37.5 %
Proficient Performer 14.6 %
Expert 14.6%
Total: 100 %
This table shows that 37.5 % answered Competent Performer, 27.1% answered
Advance Beginner while both 14.6% of the students answered Expert and Proficient
Performer in participating in class activities with commitment and dedication and a
remaining 6.3% answered Novice.
Empathize with the goals and feelings of your fellow students inside the
classroom
VARIABLE PERCENTAGE
Novice 0%
Advance Beginner 27.1 %
Competent Performer 33.3 %
Proficient Performer 18.8 %
Expert 16.7%
Total: 100 %
The percentage in this table shows that 33.3 % of Competent Performers that
the third year students empathize with the goals and feelings of fellow students in a
classroom 27.1 % chose to answer Advance Beginner while 18.8 % have chosen
Proficient Performer and a remaining 16.7 % answered Expert.
Visioning
Envision situation that do not yet exist
VARIABLE PERCENTAGE
Novice 10.4 %
Advance Beginner 29.2 %
Competent Performer 33.3 %
Proficient Performer 16.7 %
Expert 10.4%
Total: 100 %
This table shows that 33.3 % answered Competent Performers as they can
envision situations that do not yet exist while 29.2% Advanced Beginners. 16.7 % for
the Proficient Performer while both 10.4% of the students answered Expert and
Novice.
Articulate innovative ways of approaching challenges
VARIABLE PERCENTAGE
Novice 0%
Advance Beginner 31.3 %
Competent Performer 45.8 %
Proficient Performer 10.4 %
Expert 8.3%
Total: 100 %
The table above shows that in articulating innovative ways of approaching
challenges, 45.8% chose to answer Competent Performer, 31.3 % Advanced Beginner.
10.4 % have answered Proficient Performer and 8.3 % chose Expert.
Reflection
Knowledge about English Language
VARIABLE PERCENTAGE
Novice 6.3 %
Advance Beginner 27.1%
Competent Performer 45.8 %
Proficient Performer 16.7 %
Expert 0%
Total: 100 %
This table shows that 45.8 % Competent Performers have knowledge about
English Language 27.1 % answered Advance Beginner while 16.7% chose to answer
Proficient Performer and a remaining 6.3% answered Novice.
Connect experiences to own personal development
VARIABLE PERCENTAGE
Novice 0%
Advance Beginner 22.9%
Competent Performer 35.4 %
Proficient Performer 31.3 %
Expert 6.3%
Total: 100 %
The table shows that 35.4 % of the students answered Agree, 31.3% answered
Proficient Performer while 22.9% answered Advance Beginner and the remaining
6.3% answered Expert in connecting experiences to own personal development.
Self-guided learning
VARIABLE PERCENTAGE
Novice 6.3 %
Advance Beginner 22.9%
Competent Performer 33.3 %
Proficient Performer 29.2 %
Expert 8.3%
Total: 100 %
The percentage in this table shows 33.3 % Competent Performers. 29.2 %
chose to answer Proficient Performer while 22.9 % chose Advance Beginner, 8.3%
answered Expert and a remaining 6.3% Novice in self guided learning.
Awareness of the role of reflection in personal learning and development
VARIABLE PERCENTAGE
Novice 0%
Advance Beginner 20.8%
Competent Performer 41.7 %
Proficient Performer 27.1 %
Expert 6.3%
Total: 100 %
The table above indicates that 41.7 % have chosen Competent Performer as
students are aware of the reflection in personal learning and development while 27.1
% answered Advance Beginner. 20.8% of the remaining chose Proficient Performer
and a remaining 6.3 % chose to answer Expert.
Dialogue
Understand and respect others people’s view
VARIABLE PERCENTAGE
Novice 0%
Advance Beginner 14.6%
Competent Performer 27.1 %
Proficient Performer 25 %
Expert 29.2%
Total: 100 %
This table shows that 29.2% of the students answered Expert while 27.1 %
Competent Performer and 25% in Proficient Performer the remaining 14.6%
answered Advance Beginner to understand and respect other people’s view.
Set formal roles and competencies aside when needed in a conversation
VARIABLE PERCENTAGE
Novice 0%
Advance Beginner 22.9%
Competent Performer 43.8 %
Proficient Performer 18.8 %
Expert 12.5%
Total: 100 %
The percentage in this table shows 43.8 % Competent Performers that third
year students set formal roles and competencies aside when needed in a
conversation. 22.9% chose to answer Advanced Beginner while 18. 8 % have chosen
Proficient Performer and a remaining 12.5 % answered Expert.
Research Instrument
The two survey-questionnaires were used to gather the data for this
research. The researchers disseminated the survey-questionnaire by the use of
google form to easily access and to make it convenient for the respondents as well.
The questionnaires were made using a scaling wherein the respondents chose one
of the choices given as their response to a specific questionnaire. Our
questionnaire has two surveys, which consists of communicative competencies
and learning competencies. The first indicates the personal profile of our
respondents which includes their name, section and course. The second part takes
a specific factor on finding out their communicative competencies and the third
part takes a specific factor on finding out their learning competencies. The
respondents answered the questionnaire by the use of scaling. In this type of
questionnaire, respondents were given choices as their answer. The statistics that
we will use to determine the results of our study are the standard deviation,
frequency distribution, percentage distribution, and weighted mean. For the
validity and reliability, we validated first our survey-questionnaires to one of the
professional and expert when it comes to grammar and test validation, as for our
statistics we also seek a validation to one of the expert statistician in order for us
to get the numerical results of our study.
The scoring and interpretation of our survey-questionnaire, we put 5 points
for very competent in communicative competencies and expert in learning
competencies, 4 points for competent in communicative competencies and
proficient performer in learning competencies, 3 points for moderately competent
in communicative competencies and competent performer in learning
competencies, 2 points for fairly competent in communicative competencies and
advanced beginner in learning competencies, and the last is 1 point for poorly
competent in communicative competencies and novice in learning competencies.