0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views4 pages

Polya's Four-Step Problem-Solving Guide

George Polya developed a four-step problem-solving strategy consisting of understanding the problem, devising a plan, carrying out the plan, and reviewing the solution. The strategy is deceptively simple but effective. It involves examining the problem to identify what is known and unknown, considering related problems and theorems, carefully performing each step of the devised plan while tracking results, and checking that the obtained solution addresses the original problem. Several multi-step word problems are provided as examples applying Polya's four-step method.

Uploaded by

aimazaika1234
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views4 pages

Polya's Four-Step Problem-Solving Guide

George Polya developed a four-step problem-solving strategy consisting of understanding the problem, devising a plan, carrying out the plan, and reviewing the solution. The strategy is deceptively simple but effective. It involves examining the problem to identify what is known and unknown, considering related problems and theorems, carefully performing each step of the devised plan while tracking results, and checking that the obtained solution addresses the original problem. Several multi-step word problems are provided as examples applying Polya's four-step method.

Uploaded by

aimazaika1234
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Problem-Solving Strategies

One of the foremost recent mathematicians to make a study of problem


solving was George Polya (1877-1985). He was born in Hungary and moved
to the United States in 1940. The basic problem-solving strategy that Polya
advocated consisted of the following four steps. Polya’s four steps are
deceptively simple. To become a good problem solver, it helps to examine
each of these steps and determine what is involved.

Polya’s Four-Step Problem-Solving Strategy


 Understand the problem
 Devise a plan.
 Carry out the plan.
 Review the solution.

1 Understand the problem


One has to have a clear grasp of the problem at hand. Especially the
relationship that exists between the given and the unknown quantities.
Some of us Filipinos, we translate the Problem into our local dialect to
help understand the problem at hand.

Polya suggests the following guide questions


A. What is the unknown?
B. What are the data?
C. What is the condition?
D. Is it possible to satisfy the condition?
E. Is the condition sufficient to determine the unknown?
F. Separate the various parts of the condition. Can you write them down

2 Devise a plan.
This stage needed one’s independence and creativeness in coming with
a self designed course of actions towards a reasonable solution/s to the
problem at hand.

Polya suggested the following guide questions:


A. Have you seen it before? Or have you seen the same problem in a
slightly different form?
B. Do you know a related problem? Or do you know a theorem or law that
can be useful?
C. If a related problem is available, could you use it? Could you use its
results? Could you use its methods? Should you introduce some auxilliary
elements in order to make its use possible?

[Link] out the plan.


Perform each step of the plan with care and precision. Keep a record of
every result that you obtain. If your result is affirmative, continue what you
are doing. If the results does not turns out to what we expected, then keep
your alternatives open.

[Link] back.
Review the solution. Go back to the original problem and check if the
obtained solution is enough and consistent with what is being asked.

Example1.
Teacher Nick assigned a class activity. Noreen, a student of Teacher
Nick can do the activity alone in 2 hours. Another student of
Teacher Nick, Mika, can do the same activity for 3 hours. If they work
together, how long can they finish the activity?

Let x = the time it will take them to finish the activity together
1 1 1
This is a work problem. So the formula is: � = �
+�

1 1 1
= +
� 2 3
1 3+2
=
� 3(2)

1 5
=
� 6
6
x = 5
hours or 1.2 hours or 1 hour and 12 minutes

Example 2.

Stacey and Antonio decided to meet for the last time and finally part ways.
Antonio walks southbound with a speed of 5 meters per minute, while
Stacey walks westbound with a speed of 2 meters per minute. After 10
minutes, how far apart are they from each other?
Stacey
Given: @10 min
Sa =5m/min S b=20 meters
Ss = 2m/min W C=x Antonio
T = 10 min @10 min
d after 10 min = x a= 50meters

solution
�2 + �2 = �2
c = a2 + b 2
X = 502 + 202 = 53.85 meters

Example4.
Arthur, Nelson, and Nice were legitimate children of Mang Celso. When
he died, he left a savings account with P1,200,000 in it. He left a will
which states the division of his money into 1:2:3, respectively. How much
will each one get?
Arthur: 1 =1(200,000) = 200,000
Nelson: 2 =2(200,000) = 400,000
Nice: 3 =3(200,000) = 600,000
6
1,2000,000/6 = 200,000

Example 4.

During a family gathering last Christmas, Angel was able to receive 12


monetary bills consisting of P20 bills and P50 bills. If the amount received
by Angel from her Titos and Titas is P390. How many of each bill does
she get?

Solution1:
 Understand the problem
Distribute the 12 bills into 2 portions, P20 and P50.

 Devise a plan.
Perform trial and error.

 Carry out the plan.

P20 bills P50 bills Amount


11 1 11(P20)+ 1(50) = 270 wrong
10 2 10(P20) + 2(50) = 300 wrong
7 5 7(P20) + 5(50) = 390 CORRECT

ANSWER: P20 = 7pieces, and P50 = 5 pieces


 Review the solution.
Double check your solution on the previous step. The answer is correct.

Solution 2:
Solution1:
 Understand the problem
Distribute the 12 bills into 2 portions, P20 and P50.

 Devise a plan.
Let x = number of P20 bills
Let y = number of P50 bills

Equations:
1. x + y = 12 pieces
2. 20x + 50 y = P390
Use method of substitution.

 Carry out the plan.

Create equation 3 using equation 1 by transposing x to the other side.


3. Y = 12- x
Substitute equation 3 to equation 2

20x + 50(12-x) = 390


20x + 600 - 50 x = 390
20x - 50x = 390 - 600
-30x = -210
x=7

Substitute the value x to the equation 3


y = 12 - 7 = 5

Therefore
x = number of P20 bills = 7
y = number of P50 bills = 5

 Look Back
Substitute the values of x and y to equations 1 and 2.

x+y = 12 20x + 50 y = 390


7+5 = 12 20(7)+50(5) = 390
12 = 12 390 = 390

Both equations are true, therefore our answers is correct.

Common questions

Powered by AI

The example of calculating the distance between Stacey and Antonio demonstrates the importance of applying the Pythagorean theorem to determine the direct path or hypotenuse when dealing with right-angle directional movement. By understanding the underlying geometrical principles, solvers can effectively apply mathematical laws to find optimal solutions to spatial problems, reflecting the effective use of known methods in problem-solving . It also underscores the need for accurate comprehension of problem conditions and mathematical operations used in the plan's execution.

Keeping alternatives open is important because it allows the solver to remain adaptable and adjust their approach if the initial plan does not yield the expected results. This flexibility is critical, as it enables continuous problem-solving progression rather than stagnation in the face of obstacles or errors . It encourages a mindset of exploration and innovation, rather than rigid adherence to a potentially flawed strategy.

'Looking Back' allows the solver to verify that the obtained solution satisfies the original problem conditions and requirements, ensuring consistency and completeness. This step can also uncover errors or omissions in the reasoning process, thus enhancing the reliability and accuracy of the solution . Additionally, it provides learning opportunities for future problem-solving endeavors by reflecting on the process and outcome.

Introducing auxiliary elements can bridge the gap between known solutions and a new problem by transforming the original problem into one that resembles a previously solved scenario. This allows the solver to leverage existing solutions, methods, or theorems effectively and can lead to innovative problem-solving techniques when standard methods are not applicable directly .

Questioning whether there is a known theorem or rule that can be useful aids in identifying established principles that may offer a direct pathway to a solution. This approach encourages solvers to draw upon mathematical frameworks and rules that can provide insights or shortcuts, streamlining the problem-solving process by using reliable and tested methods .

Considering Polya's question 'Have you seen it before?' helps in identifying similarities with previously solved problems or known theorems that can be applied to the current problem. This fosters the use of existing knowledge and techniques, allowing a solver to potentially shorten the problem-solving process by applying proven methods and solutions .

Polya’s approach is distinct from traditional methods as it emphasizes a structured yet flexible problem-solving process, encouraging independence, creativity, and reflection at every step. It offers the advantage of fostering critical thinking and problem-solving skills in a learning context, equipping learners with the ability to tackle a wide range of issues beyond rote memorization or routine application of formulas . This results in a more adaptive and holistic learning experience that can be applied across various disciplines.

Polya's four-step problem-solving strategy includes: 1) Understanding the problem, which involves identifying the unknowns, data, and conditions, ensuring they are sufficient and clear . 2) Devising a plan by drawing on past experiences, related problems, and possibly introducing auxiliary elements to find a solution . 3) Carrying out the plan carefully while keeping an open mind to adjust if things don't go as expected . 4) Looking back to check and review the solution to ensure it is complete and correct . These steps promote a systematic and thoughtful approach to solving problems, fostering independence and creativity while confirming accuracy.

According to Polya, the understanding of conditions can be verified by questioning whether it's possible to meet the given conditions and whether these are sufficient to determine the unknowns. By separating and clearly writing down the various parts of the condition, a solver can ensure that their understanding aligns with the requirements needed to solve the problem . This verification is crucial for formulating an appropriate solution strategy.

Understanding the conditions and data of a problem is crucial for identifying the relationships between known and unknown quantities and assessing whether conditions are sufficient for solving the problem. Without a clear grasp of these elements, it is challenging to devise an appropriate plan or verify the sufficiency of the solution . This understanding enables more accurate problem-solving and reduces the chances of errors.

You might also like