Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning MCQs
Uploaded by
Lisa LInductive vs. Deductive Reasoning MCQs
Uploaded by
Lisa L- Multiple Choice Question Section
Common questions
Powered by AIThe text highlights that scientific theory is a product of the times, indicating its contextual and temporal limitations, and therefore cannot be proven beyond a doubt .
When a researcher moves from an empirical pattern to theory, it is indicative of inductive reasoning. This differs from the deductive approach in which a theory leads to a hypothesis before data collection, moving from general to specific .
The central focus of the scientific process is the continuous interplay between theory and data .
Social research integrates theory, verifiable data, logical reasoning, and systematic observation and analysis to advance the scientific enterprise .
This argument is classified as deductive reasoning because it involves deriving a specific conclusion from a general principle, assuming the premise is true .
The discovery of misclassification of network data in the 2004 General Social Survey illustrates science's potential to self-correct and increase accuracy over time by identifying and correcting data errors, leading to more reliable findings .
According to Dixon and Rosenbaum, anti-black stereotyping was reduced when whites interacted with blacks in the workplace .
The type of reasoning used by the researcher was inductive reasoning. She observed acts of vandalism among same-sex gangs and theorized about the underlying cause, which involved developing a theory from empirical observations .
In her study, Lareau used an inductive research approach. She inferred patterns from her data, which led to the development of a theory based on observed empirical patterns .
Inductive reasoning involves conclusions that are more or less probable, moving from specific observations to broader generalizations, in contrast to deductive reasoning, which is characterized by moving from general principles to particular conclusions .
