0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views9 pages

Algebraic Identity in Polynomial Derivatives

The document presents a solution to problem U23 from a mathematical reflections publication. It uses an algebraic identity related to polynomials and derivatives to solve the problem. The identity states that the sum of the reciprocals of the differences between the roots of a polynomial's derivative and the polynomial is equal to the derivative of the polynomial divided by the polynomial. The solution applies this to evaluate the given sum in U23.

Uploaded by

Gabriel Berce
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views9 pages

Algebraic Identity in Polynomial Derivatives

The document presents a solution to problem U23 from a mathematical reflections publication. It uses an algebraic identity related to polynomials and derivatives to solve the problem. The identity states that the sum of the reciprocals of the differences between the roots of a polynomial's derivative and the polynomial is equal to the derivative of the polynomial divided by the polynomial. The solution applies this to evaluate the given sum in U23.

Uploaded by

Gabriel Berce
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

On an Algebraic Identity

September 19, 2008

Roberto Bosch Cabrera

Abstract
We solve problem U23 from Mathematical Reflections (which remained open
for a while.) We use a simple algebraic identity concerning polynomials and
their derivatives, demonstrating its usefulness in solving problems.

U23. Evaluate the sum


n−1
X 1
k=0
1 + 8 sin2 ( kπ
n )

Dorin Andrica and Mihai Piticari

Solution:
It is well known that
eix − e−ix
sin x =
2i
so  
kπ  2kπ 2kπ

1 + 8 sin 2
= 5 − 2 ei n + e−i n .
n
Let
2kπ
ei n = ξk
then we need to find the following sum:
n−1
X ξk
.
−2ξk2 + 5ξk − 2
k=0

But we know the following


x −x 2 1 1 1
= = · − ·
−2x2 + 5x − 2 (2 − x)(1 − 2x) 3 2 − x 3 1 − 2x

Mathematical Reflections 5 (2008) 1


so it follows that
n−1 n−1 n−1
X ξk 2 X 1 1 X 1
= · − · .
−2ξk2 + 5ξk − 2 3 2 − ξk 6 1
− ξk
k=0 k=0 k=0 2

Observe that ξk , k = 0, ..., n − 1 are the n roots of the polynomial p(x) = xn − 1.

So we have to solve the following subproblem:

Let ak (k = 1, ..., n) be the roots of the polynomial p(x) of degree n. Find the
sum:
n
X 1
x − ak
k=1
This question is well known and it was the motivation to write this article. The
answer is quite simple
n
X 1 p0 (x)
= . (1)
x − ak p(x)
k=1

We continue with the proof to the above statement. Because p(x) = (x − a1 ) · · · (x −


an ) then the product rule of differentiation yields
p0 (x) = (x − a2 ) · · · (x − an ) + · · · + (x − a1 ) · · · (x − an−1 )
and we are done.

Now we turn to the solution of U23:
0 n−1
In this case p(x) = xn − 1 so pp(x)
(x)
= nx
xn −1 . We know the following equalities
are true
n−1
X 1 p0 (2) n2n−1
= = n
2 − ξk p(2) 2 −1
k=0
and
n−1 n
X 1 p0 ( 12 ) 2n−1 2n
1 = = = .
k=0 2
− ξk p( 12 ) 1
2n − 1
1 − 2n
Finally
n−1
X 1 2 n2n−1 1 2n n 2n + 1
= · − · = · .
k=0
1 + 8 sin2 ( kπ
n )
3 2n − 1 6 1 − 2n 3 2n − 1

We now discuss some problems and leave others for the reader to solve.

Mathematical Reflections 5 (2008) 2


1. Let p(x) be a non-constant polynomial with real roots. Prove that
p0 (x)2 ≥ p(x)p00 (x) for all x ∈ R.

(Martin Aigner, Gűnter M. Ziegler, Proofs from The Book, Third edition)

Solution:
If x = ai is a root of p(x), then there is nothing to show. Assume that x is not a
root, then
n
p0 (x) X 1
= .
p(x) x − ak
k=1
Differentiating this expression we obtain
n
p00 (x)p(x) − p0 (x)2 X 1
2
=− <0
p(x) (x − ak )2
k=1

and this concludes the proof.



2. Let P be an algebraic polynomial of degree n having only real zeros and real
coefficients.
a) Prove that for every real x the following inequality holds:

(n − 1)P 0 (x)2 ≥ nP (x)P 00 (x) (2)

b) Examine the cases of equality.

(IMC 1998)

Solution:
Observe that both sides of (2) are equal to zero if n = 1. Suppose that n > 1 and
let x1 , ..., xn be the zeros of P . Clearly (2) is true when x = xi , i ∈ {1, ..., n}, and
equality is possible only if P 0 (xi ) = 0, i.e if xi is a multiple zero of P . Now suppose
that x is not a zero of P . Using the identities
n
P 0 (x) X 1 P 00 (x) X 2
= , = .
P (x) x − xi P (x) (x − xi )(x − xj )
i=1 1≤i<j≤n

we find
2 n
P 0 (x) P 00 (x) X n − 1
 X 2
(n − 1) −n = − .
P (x) P (x) (x − xi )2 (x − xi )(x − xj )
i=1 1≤i<j≤n

Mathematical Reflections 5 (2008) 3


But this last expression is simply
 2
X 1 1

x − xi x − xj
1≤i<j≤n

and therefore is positive. The inequality is proved. In order for (2) to hold with
equality sign for every real x it is necessary that x1 = x2 = . . . = xn . A direct
verification shows that indeed, if P (x) = c(x − x1 )n , then (2) becomes an identity.

3. Suppose that every zero of the polynomial f (x) is simple. Find the sum of the
reciprocals of the differences between the roots of the equation f 0 (x) = 0 and the
roots of the equation f (x) = 0.

([Link]. Polynomials.)

Solution:
Let ri be the zeros of f (x) and let sj be the zeros of f 0 (x). Then, since
X
f 0 (x) = f (x) (x − ri )−1 ,

for each j we have: X


0 = f 0 (sj ) = f (sj )
(sj − ri )−1 .

Because f (sj ) 6= 0 then we can conclude that (sj − ri )−1 = 0.


P

4. Determine those values of the real number a and positive integer n exceeding 1
for wich
n
X xk + 2
=n−3
xk − 1
k=1

where x1 , ..., xn are the zeros of xn + axn−1 + an−1 x + 1.

([Link]. Polynomials.)

Solution: Let p(x) = xn + axn−1 + an−1 x + 1 then p0 (x) = nxn−1 + a(n − 1)xn−2 +
an−1 . We have
xk + 2 3
=1+
xk − 1 xk − 1
therefore
n n
X xk + 2 X 1 p0 (1)
=n−3 =n−3
xk − 1 1 − xk p(1)
k=1 k=1

Mathematical Reflections 5 (2008) 4


and we have
n + an − a + an−1
n−3· =n−3
an−1 + a + 2
or equivalently (a + 1)(n − 2) = 0, so a = −1 or n = 2. The case a = −1 yields the
polynomial xn − xn−1 − x + 1 = (x − 1)(xn−1 − 1). But in this case, one of the zeros
is 1 and the left side of the given equation is undefined. Hence a 6= −1. The case
n = 2 yields the polynomial x2 + +2ax + 1, whose zeros can be verified to satisfy
the condition, provided a 6= −1.

5. Let −1 < x < 1. Show that
6
X 1 − x2 1 + x7
= 7 · (3)
k=0
1 − 2x cos( 2kπ
7 )+x
2 1 − x7

(Longlist IMO 1988)

Solution:
We will use the follwing fact
2kπ 2kπ
ei + e−i
 
2kπ 7 7
cos = .
7 2
Let
2kπ
ei 7 = ξk
so
1 − x2 2(1 − x2 )ξk
= .
1 − 2x cos( 2kπ
7 )+x
2 −2xξk2 + (2 + 2x2 )ξk − 2x
The discriminant
√ of the quadratic −2xξk2 + (2 + 2x2 )ξk − 2x is D = 4(1 − x2 )2 .
Therefore D = 2 1 − x2 = 2(1 − x2 ) and the zeros are x and x1 . We have
−2xξk2 + (2 + 2x2 )ξk − 2x = −2x(ξk − x)(ξk − x1 ).
Finally,

1 − x2 (x − x1 )ξk 1
x x
= = −
1 − 2x cos( 2kπ
7 )+x
2 (ξk − x)(ξk − x1 ) 1
x − ξk x − ξk

and
6 6 6
X 1 − x2 1X 1 X 1 1 p0 ( 1 ) p0 (x) 1 + x7
= 1 −x = · 1x −x· = 7·
k=0
1 − 2x cos( 2kπ
7 )+x
2 x
k=0 x − ξk k=0
x − ξk x p( x ) p(x) 1 − x7

where p(x) = x7 − 1.

Mathematical Reflections 5 (2008) 5




6. Let x1 , x2 , ..., xn be real numbers that satisfy 0 < x1 < x2 < · · · < xn < 1 and
let x0 = 0, xn+1 = 1. Given:
n+1
X 1
=0 i = 1, 2, ..., n
xi − xj
j=0,j6=i

prove that xn+1−i = 1 − xi for i = 1, 2, ..., n.

(Shortlist IMO 1986)

Solution:
Let P (x) = (x − x0 )(x − x1 ) · · · (x − xn )(x − xn+1 ). Then
n+1
0
X P (x)
P (x) =
x − xj
j=0
n+1
XX P (x)
P 00 (x) = .
(x − xj )(x − xk )
j=0 k6=j

Therefore X 1
P 00 (xi ) = 2P 0 (xi )
xi − xj
j6=i

for i = 0, 1, ..., n + 1 and the given condition implies P 00 (xi ) = 0 for i = 1, 2, ..., n.
Consequently
x(x − 1)P 00 (x) = (n + 2)(n + 1)P (x). (4)
It is easy to observe that there is a unique monic polynomial of degree n+2 satisfying
the differential equation (4). On the other hand, the polynomial Q(x) = (−1)n P (1−
x) also satisfies this equation, is monic, and deg Q = n + 2. Therefore (−1)n P (1 −
x) = P (x), and the result follows.

7. Let p(z) be a polynomial of degree n with complex coefficients. Its roots (in the
complex plane) can be covered by a disk of radius r. Show that for any complex
number k, the roots of the polynomial np(z) − kp0 (z) can be covered by a disk of
radius r + |k|.

(Putnam 1957)

Mathematical Reflections 5 (2008) 6


Solution:
Let the roots of p(z) be a1 , a2 , ..., an . Suppose they all lie in a disk with center c
and radius r, then |c − an | ≤ r. Suppose that |c − w| > r + |k|. We will show that w
is not a root of np(z) − kp0 (z). Indeed, we have that |w − ai | ≥ |w − c| − |c − ai | >
0 (z)
r + |k| − r = |k|, thus pp(z)
P 1
= (z−ai ) (note that this is still true if we have
0 0 0
repeated roots), so | pp(w)
(w) n
| < |k| and hence |k pp(w)
(w)
| < n. Thus |n − k pp(w)
(w)
| > 0,
but |p(w)| > 0 (since w lies outside the disk containing all the roots of p(z)), so
0 (w)
|np(w) − kp0 (w)| = |p(w)||n − k pp(w) | > 0.

8. Let p(z) be a polynomial of degree n, all of whose zeros have absolute value 1
in the complex plane and let g(z) = p(z) 0
n . Show that all zeros of g (z) = 0 have
z2
absolute value 1.

(Putnam 2005)

Solution:
n g 0 (z) p0 (z) n
We have z 2 g(z) = p(z), therefore g(z) = p(z) − 2z . Moreover

n n
g 0 (z) X
 
1 1 1 X z + rj
= − =
g(z) z − rj 2z 2z z − rj
j=1 j=1

where r1 , ..., rn are the zeros of p(z). Now if z 6= rj for all j, then

z + rj (z + rj )(z − rj ) |z|2 − 1 + 2Im(zrj )i


= =
z − rj |z − rj |2 |z − rj |2

and so  
n
zg 0 (z) |z|2
 
−1  X 1
Re = · .
g(z) 2 |z − rj |2
j=1

Since the quantity in parentheses is positive g 0 (z) can be 0 only if |z| = 1. If on the
other hand z = rj for some j, then |z| = 1 anyway.

9. For any polynomial g, denote by d(g) the minimun distance of any two of its real
zeros (d(g) = ∞ if g has at most one real zero). Assume that g and g + g 0 both are
of degree k ≥ 2 and have k distinct real zeros. Then d(g + g 0 ) ≥ d(g).

(IMC 2007)

Mathematical Reflections 5 (2008) 7


Solution:
Let x1 < x2 < · · · < xk be the roots of g. Suppose that a and b are roots of g + g 0
satisfying 0 < b − a < d(g). Then a and b cannot be roots of g and

g 0 (a) g 0 (b)
= = −1. (5)
g(a) g(b)
0
Since gg is strictly decreasing between consecutive zeros of g (see problem 1.), we
must have a < xj < b for some j. For all i = 1, 2, ..., k − 1 we have xi+1 − xi > b − a
hence a − xi > b − xi+1 . If i < j both sides of this inequality are negative, if i ≥ j
1
both sides are positive. In any case a−x i
< b−x1i+1 and hence:

k−1 k−1
g 0 (a) X 1 1 X 1 1 g 0 (b)
= + < + =
g(a) a − xi a − xk b − xi+1 b − x1 g(b)
i=1 | {z } i=1 | {z }
<0 >0

This contradicts (5).

Mathematical Reflections 5 (2008) 8


Problems for independent study

1. From problem 5. deduce that: csc2 ( π7 ) + csc2 ( 2π 2 3π


7 ) + csc ( 7 ) = 8.

(Longlist IMO 1988)

2. Let the roots of an nth degree polynomial P (z), with complex coefficients, lie on
the unit circle in the complex plane. Prove that the roots of the polynomial

2zP 0 (z) − nP (z)

lie on the same circle.

(IMC 1995)

3. If all zeros of a polynomial P (z) lie in the same half plane, then all zeros of the
derivative P 0 (z) lie in the same half plane.

(In a sharper formulation the problem tells us that the smallest convex polygon
that contains the zeros of P (z) also contains the zeros of P 0 (z)).

(Gauss-Lucas Theorem)

Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Mario Garcia Armas.

Mathematical Reflections 5 (2008) 9

You might also like