0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views7 pages

Stability Analysis of Cantilever Wall

The document evaluates the stability of a cantilever retaining wall based on parameters from the Australian Standard AS4678-2002. It calculates factors of safety against sliding and overturning and determines that the wall satisfies the stability requirements.

Uploaded by

chiayu0326
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views7 pages

Stability Analysis of Cantilever Wall

The document evaluates the stability of a cantilever retaining wall based on parameters from the Australian Standard AS4678-2002. It calculates factors of safety against sliding and overturning and determines that the wall satisfies the stability requirements.

Uploaded by

chiayu0326
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Example R2 – (Page 104 Handouts)

 Evaluate the stability of the cantilever wall against sliding


and overturning based on Australian Standard AS4678-
2002:
 Uncontrolled backfill soil 1.6m 0.4m 1.5m

K*a = tan2(45 – '*/2)


K*p = tan2(45 + '*/2)
Sand
4.4m
=35o
t=18kN/m3

0.2m
0.6m t=25kN/m3 0.4m
= 

T1-2023

Australian Standard
c* = uc  c * = tan-1( u  tan() )
'=35o

'* = tan-1(  tan(o))=27.7o


Strength reduction factor Fill class I Fill class II Uncontrolled Insitu soil
(98%) (95%) fill

Drained parameters, c, 


Strength u 0.95 0.90 0.75 0.85
uc 0.90 0.75 0.50 0.70
Serviceability u 1.0 0.95 0.90 1.00
uc 1.0 0.85 0.65 0.85
Undrained parameters, cu
Strength uc 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.5
Serviceability uc 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.75
T1-2023

1
Example R2 – (Page 104 Handouts)
 Evaluate the stability of the cantilever wall against sliding
and overturning based on Australian Standard AS4678-
2002:
 Uncontrolled backfill soil 1.6m 0.4m 1.5m

K*a = tan2(45 – '*/2)=0.37


K*p = tan2(45 + '*/2)=2.74
Sand

h a  Ka v  2c Ka


4.4m
=35o
t=18kN/m3
h  p  Kp v  2c Kp
0.2m
h a  0.37v 0.6m t=25kN/m3 0.4m
= 
h  p  2.74v
T1-2023

Example R2 – (Page 104 Handouts)


 Evaluate the stability of the cantilever wall against sliding
and overturning based on Australian Standard AS4678-
2002:
 Uncontrolled backfill soil 1.6m 0.4m 1.5m

a=1.25×18=22.5kN/m3

p=0.8×18=14.4kN/m3
Sand
Stability analysis: 4.4m
=35o
c=0.8×25=20kN/m3 t=18kN/m3

LL on backfill:
0.2m
0.6m t=25kN/m3 0.4m
σLL=1.5×5=7.5kPa
= 

T1-2023

2
Example R2 a=1.25×18=22.5kN/m3
p=0.8×18=14.4kN/m3
 Evaluate the stability of the wall
c=0.8×25=20kN/m3
AS4678-2002:
σ LL=1.5×5=7.5kPa
1.6m 0.4m 1.5m v
h a  0.37v 7.5kPa

h  p  2.74v
4.4m

v
0kPa
0.2m
0.4m
14.4 0.6  8.6kPa =  7.5  22.55  120kPa

T1-2023

Example R2 a=1.25×18=22.5kN/m3
p=0.8×18=14.4kN/m3
 Evaluate the stability of the wall
c=0.8×25=20kN/m3
AS4678-2002:
σ LL=1.5×5=7.5kPa
1.6m 0.4m 1.5m h a
h a  0.37v 2.8kPa

h  p  2.74v
4.4m

h  p
0kPa
0.2m
0.4m
23.6kPa =  44.4kPa

T1-2023

3
Example R2 a=1.25×18=22.5kN/m3
p=0.8×18=14.4kN/m3
 Evaluate the stability of the wall
c=0.8×25=20kN/m3
AS4678-2002:
σ LL=1.5×5=7.5kPa
Force Lever Arm Moment
(KN pmr) (m) (KN.m pmr) 1.6m 0.4m 1.5m h a
Fa1 2.8×5=14 5/2=2.5 35
2.8kPa
Fa2 0.5x(41.6x5)=104 5/3=1.67 173

Fp 0.5x(23.6x0.6)=7 0.6/3=0.2 1.4

F4 0.4x4.6x20=36.8 1.8 66.2

F5 0.4x3.5x20=28 3.5/2=1.75 49 4.4m Fa1


F6 1.5x4.6x14.4=99.4 2+1.5/2=2.75 273

Fa2
h  p F4 F6
0kPa
Fp 0.2m
0.4m
23.6kPa =  44.4kPa
F5

T1-2023

Example R2

 Evaluate the stability of the wall


AS4678-2002:

1.6m 0.4m 1.5m


Check for overturning:

nR* = S*

S*=35+173=208 KN.m pmr

R*=1.4+66.2+49+273=390 KN.m pmr 4.4m Fa1

Assume failure results in moderate damage and


Fa2
loss of services: F4 F6

Fp 0.2m
n=1.0
0.4m
nR*=390 > S*=208 = 
(KN.m pmr) F5

T1-2023

4
Example R2

 Evaluate the stability of the wall


AS4678-2002:

1.6m 0.4m 1.5m


Check for sliding:

nR* = S* n=1.0
S*=14+104=118 KN.m pmr

R*=Fp +Fs 4.4m Fa1


Fs=[Link]( '*=27.7o
Fa2
Fs=().tan( o F4 F6

Fp 0.2m
nR*=93.2 > S*=118 0.4m
(KN)
=  F5
Fs
T1-2023

Anchored Wall Example R4


K*a = tan2(45 – 26.1/2)=0.388 7.5kPa
K*p = tan2(45 + 26.1/2)=2.575
=22.5kN/m3
W 1.5m
Fa1=7.5x0.388x(4+D)=2.91(4+D)
Fa2=0.388x22.5x(4+D)2/2=4.365(4+D) 2 H=4m
7.5K a* Fa1
Fp =2.575x14.4x(D)2/2=18.5D 2

Fs Fa2
Passive =14.4kN/m3 Active
D
Fp

K *p *p D
K a* a*  H  D 
T1-2023

10

5
Anchored Wall Example - AS4678-2002
Fa1=2.91(4+D) 7.5kPa
Fa2=4.365(4+D) 2
Fp=18.5D 2 =22.5kN/m3
W 1.5m
 4 D  D 
M a1  Fa1   1.5   2.91 4  D    0.5 
 2  2  H=4m
2  2  2D  7.5K a* Fa1
M a2  Fa 2   4  D   1.5   4.365  4  D    1.17 
 3   3 
Fa2
Passive =14.4kN/m3 Active
D
Fp
 2D   2D 
M p  Fp   2.5   18.5D 2   2.5  K *p *p D
 3   3  K a* a*  H  D 
T1-2023

11

Anchored Wall Example - AS4678-2002


D 
M a1  2.91 4  D    0.5  7.5kPa
2 
2  2D 
M a 2  4.365  4  D    1.17 
 3  =22.5kN/m3
W 1.5
 2 D 
M p  18.5D 2   2.5 
 3 
H=4m
nR* = S* 7.5K a* Fa1
87.3  94.5D  16.6 D 2  9.5 D3  0
Fa2
Passive =14.4kN/m3 Active
D
Fp

K *p *p D
K a* a*  H  D 
T1-2023

12

6
Anchored Wall Example - AS4678-2002
nR* = S* 7.5kPa

87.3  94.5D  16.6 D 2  9.5D3  0


=22.5kN/m3
W 1.5
87.3  94.5D  16.6 D  9.5D  f
2 3

H=4m
Assumed 1 3 2 2.5 2.75 2.87 7.5K a* Fa1
D
f 155 -35 134 71 24 -2.8
Fa2
Passive =14.4kN/m3 Active
D
D  2.87m Fp

K *p *p D
K a* a*  H  D 
T1-2023

13

Anchored Wall Example - AS4678-2002


Calculate anchor force: 7.5kPa

F = 0
=22.5kN/m3
nR* = S*
W 1.5
T
Fp  = Fa1+Fa2 H=4m
7.5K a* Fa1
 = Fa1+Fa2- Fp
 = 73.6KN pmr Fa2
Passive =14.4kN/m3 Active
D  2.87m
D
Fp
e.g. if the anchors @
3m apart: T=221 kPa per anchor K *p *p D
K a* a*  H  D 
T1-2023

14

You might also like