Pressurized Irrigation Systems Overview
Pressurized Irrigation Systems Overview
Abstract
Pakistan’s cultivable area lies mostly in arid and semiarid climatic regions. Thus,
more than 80 percent of its irrigation water requirement is met either through canal
system or groundwater pumping. As the population is increasing every year, food
requirement is also increasing and thus water required to produce more food is
ultimately going higher every year. On the other hand, the per capita water
availability is reducing and groundwater extraction is increasing annually. Therefore,
the overall available water resources (surface and groundwater) are shrinking.
Consequently, there is an imbalance between supply and demand, which demands
more efficient utilization of the available water resources. Use of pressurized
irrigation systems (Sprinkler and Drip Irrigation Systems), which have performance
efficiencies significantly higher than the gravity irrigation system, may help solving
the problem. Adoption and successful use of pressurized irrigation systems require
that all the stakeholders, practicing irrigated agriculture, including farmers and
professionals must update their knowledge about these systems. The Punjab
Irrigation and Agriculture Departments have recently launched LBDCIP and PIPIP
projects to introduce high efficiency irrigation systems (HEIS) among farmers for
row crops, particularly cotton, maize, sugarcane vegetables and orchards on a
participatory basis. Thus, it becomes important to provide sound knowledge based
*
Junaid Nawaz Chauhdary
Department of Irrigation and Drainage, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
For correspondance: mjunaidnawaz@[Link]
Ghulam Shabbir
Directorate of Water Management, Agriculture Department, Government of Punjab, Pakistan.
275
276 S. Ali and M. M. Alam
information to the professionals and users of these systems through books and other
printed materials.
Keywords: Drip Irrigation, Sprinkler Irrigation, Drippers, Sprinkler Heads, Laterals,
Operation Time
Learning Objectives
1. To introduce the reader about the pressurized irrigation systems.
2. To familiarize the professionals and farmers about the components, design,
installation, operation and maintenance of the pressurized irrigation
systems.
3. Introducing improved systems to replace the traditional ones may encounter
several issues that must be resolved to operate the systems successfully. The
purpose of this chapter is to highlight such issues and their solutions.
4. The solved examples and questions to exercise, provide opportunities to the
students for a better understanding of the subject.
13.1 Introduction
A pressurized irrigation system operates through a piping system where water flows
under pressure as compared to gravity systems where water flows due to level
difference. The pressurized irrigation system provides opportunities of minimum
water losses which otherwise occur due to seepage, surface absorption and through
evaporation in gravity flow condition particularly in open channel flow. This system
also allows the irrigator to apply more precise quantities of water wherever is needed.
Thus, the performance efficiencies are much higher than the gravity irrigation
systems. Major types of pressurized irrigation systems include drip or trickle
irrigation system and sprinkler irrigation system.
The emitter selection mainly depends on the infiltration rate of the soil. The emitter
spacing decides the emitter discharge, however, the selection of emitter spacing and
discharge for different soil is given in Table 13.1.
Table 13.1 Recommended Emitter Spacing (cm) for different Soil Types and Emitter
Discharge
Soil Type Discharge Rates (Lph)
2 4 8
Light 40 80 120
Medium (cm) 80 120 160
Heavy 120 160 200
Usually, emitter with 2 Lph discharge is used for heavy soils. In lighter soils, which
are very loose and absorb water very quickly, no runoff occurs. Sandy soils do not
hold water and thus dry out very quickly. For sandy soils 4 Lph discharge emitter
can be used. Crop type also influences the emitter selection. There are two types of
emitter: pressure compensating and non-pressure compensating. Pressure
compensating emitters deliver a constant output of water even with changes of
pressure and elevation. In non-pressure compensating emitters, output of water
changes with the change in pressure and elevation.
[Link] Type of Crop and Peak Water Requirement
Drip irrigation system designed for its maximum capacity, should consider type of
crop and its peak water requirement. To calculate system irrigation requirement, row
to row spacing, emitter to emitter spacing and discharge of emitters for a certain crop
are needed to be decided as given below:
Area m ∗ Emitter flow Lph
Total flow (Lph = 1
LL Spacing m ∗ Emitter Spacing m
Application rate is defined as depth of water applied per unit time or flow rate per
unit area. It can be calculated by following two methods:
Method-1
Drainage Requirements of Irrigated Land 281
Availability in the market, affordability of price, and durability of material are also
important aspects in selecting an efficient and economic pipe network.
The head loss in lateral, submain and mainline is calculated by using Hazen Williams
equation given as following:
s
1222 .
S
f= × L + L¯ 13.4
D#. ^
Where
f = Friction head loss (m)
c = Hazen-William’s roughness constant (given in table 13.2)
q = Flow rate (Lps)
D = Inside diameter (mm)
L= Length (m)
Le= Equivalent length of accessories (given in table 13.3)
Head loss can also be calculated through Darcy Weisbach equation:
FLQ
hW = 6.377 13.5
D
Where:
hf= Head loss (m)
F= friction factor for Darcy equation
L= Length of pipe (m)
282 S. Ali and M. M. Alam
Table 13.3 Equivalent Length of Straight Pipe for Fitting Accessories (m)
Accessory internal 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 4.0
diameter inch inch inch inch inch inch inch
Valves Gate valve 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.8
Ball valve 2.4 3.4 4.6 5.8 6.7 8.2 11.6
Elbows Regular 90o 1.1 1.6 2.3 2.6 2.8 3.4 4.0
Regular 45o 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.7
Tees Line flow 0.5 1.0 1.7 2.3 2.8 3.7 5.2
Branch flow 1.3 2.0 3.0 3.7 4.0 5.2 6.4
Friction factor (f) in Darcy equation can be calculated by using equations 13.6-13.8
for different flow regimes and Reynold’s numbers.
64
F= for Re < 2000 13.6
Re
1 e 9.35
= 1.14 − 2log % ' + , For Re > 4000 13.7
√f D Re√f
Where:
f= friction factor
e= internal roughness of pipe
D= inner diameter of pipe (mm)
Re= Reynold’s number
Drainage Requirements of Irrigated Land 283
1 e
= 2log % { | + 1.14 ForRe > 10000 13.8
√f D
f= friction factor
e= internal roughness of pipe
D= inner diameter of pipe (mm)
Re= Reynold’s number
[Link] Selection of Pump
Discharge and head are the two important parameters for the selection of the pump
in the design of drip irrigation system. Pump discharge is calculated by multiplying
the emitter discharge by total number of emitters in the area. Head developed by the
pump should be sufficient to overcome head loss in the system and provide 1 bar
head at the exit. Total head loss includes: head loss in laterals, sub-main, main,
emitter operating pressure and head loss in power unit and filtration system. Pump
size can be selected using pump characteristic curves provided by the manufacturer.
A typical pump characteristic curve of the head vs pump for various pump rpm is
given in Fig. 13.3.
Hp = Horse power
Q = Discharge (Lps)
H = Head (m)
Example 13.1: Determine HP of prime mover if the pump discharge is 25 Lps and
the total head against which water is to be lifted is 45 m. Take the motor efficiency
as 60%.
Given:
Q = 25 Lps
H = 45 m
25 ∗ 45
Hp =
76
Calculated Hp= 14.8
#.
Actual Hp = = 24.6→ 25
%.^
Example 13.2: Design a drip irrigation system for Cotton crop with the following
data:
Area = 160 x 120 m2
Plant x Plant= 0.5 m
Row x Row= 1 m
Water source: Both tube well and canal water is used for irrigation.
Suction lift: 2 m
Delivery lift: 2 m.
Solution
Field survey is conducted and field layout is developed. To reduce the system capital
and operational cost, the whole field is divided into four equal zones as shown in Fig.
13.4. The location of power unit, mainline, sub-main and lateral is also determined.
In field survey, it is also analyzed that the soil of the area is sandy loam.
Drainage Requirements of Irrigated Land 285
Water Sampling
Water from canal and tubewell is stored in a settling pond where all impurities like
suspended, chemical and biological were present. Hydrocyclone, sand media and
screen filters are selected to control and clean the impurities.
Emitter Selection
The emitter with 4 Lph discharge is recommended for sandy loam soils. The lateral
with 4 Lph and 0.30 m emitter spacing is selected as per availability in market.
Discharge of One Zone
As the drip irrigation system is divided into eight operational zones so the number of
plants in one zone is as following:
Dimension of one zone= 30 × 50 m2
Number of laterals in one zone= 50/1 = 50 (as RxR= 1 meter)
Length of lateral= 30 m
Total emitters in one lateral= 30 /0.30 = 100 (as emitters spacing on lateral line was
0.30 m)
Total emitters in one zone= 100 × 50= 5000
Total discharge in one zone= Emitter discharge x No. of emitters
Total discharge in one zone= 5000 × 4= 20000 Lph
Design of Lateral, Sub-main and Main Pipe
The lateral diameter is selected on the basis of head loss, price of lateral and market
availability. The lateral with 12 mm diameter is selected.
The head loss was calculated by equation 13.5
FLQ
hf 6.377
D
286 S. Ali and M. M. Alam
Lateral Pipe
The diameter of lateral pipe= 12 mm
The length of lateral pipe= 30 m
Total emitters on one lateral= 30/0.30= 100
Total flow of lateral pipe= 100 × 4= 400 Lph
Head loss in lateral pipe= 1.8 m
By using head loss equation, the diameter of main and sub-main pipe is selected in
such a way, so that design requirements are fulfilled.
Sub-main Pipe
The diameter of Sub main pipe= 76.2 mm
The length of sub main pipe= 50 m
Total flow of sub main pipe= 50 × 400 = 20000 Lph
Head loss in sub main pipe= 0.5 m
Main Pipe
The diameter of main pipe= 76.2 mm
The length of main pipe= 30 m
Total flow of main pipe= 20000 Lph
Headloss in main pipe= 0.3 m
Pump Selection
Discharge of pump= 20000 Lph = 5.5 Lps
Total Head of pump= Emitter operating pressure+ Head loss in lateral+ Head loss in
submain+ Head loss in main line + Head loss in the joints, turns, filtration unit plus
miscellaneous head loss+ suction lift + Delivery lift.
Required Head of pump= 10 + 1.8 + 0.5+ 0.3 +20 + 2+ 2 = 36.6 ≈37 m
Assume Pump efficiency = 60 %
Required Discharge= 5.5 /0.6= 9.16 ≈ 9 Lps
According to discharge, head requirement and market availability, pump is selected
with 14.1 Lps discharge and 44 m head.
Motor Selection
Motor selection is done by using equation 13.9. Efficiency of the motor is kept at 75
% according to supplier
Q∗H
Hp =
76 ∗ efficiency
Drainage Requirements of Irrigated Land 287
9 ∗ 37
Hp =
76 ∗ 0.75
Hp=5.84 ≈ 6 Hp
Example 13.3: Design a drip irrigation system for the following data:
Area = 180 m x 160m
Soil type = Sandy loam
Crop = Mango plants
Plant stage= Mature
Plant to plant distance = 10 m
Row to row distance = 10 m
Water table is 15 m below from the ground surface in existing dug well
Delivery head is 2 m above ground surface
Given:
Area = 180 m x 160m = 28800 m2
Water source= Dug well
Suction lift (m) = 0 m (Use submersible pump, as the water table 15 m below ground
surface)
Delivery lift = 15+2= 17 m
Plant spacing = 10 m
Row spacing = 10 m
Discharge Required
Calculate total no. of plants = 28800/ (10 x 10) = 288
Assume emitter discharge = 8 Lph (As plants are mature)
Calculate total No. of emitters (4 per plant) 288 x 4 =1152
Calculate total flow rate = 1152 x 8 = 9216 Lph = 2.56 Lps
288 S. Ali and M. M. Alam
Total Head of pump= Emitter operating pressure+ Head loss in lateral+ Head loss in
submain+ Head loss in main line + Head loss in the joints, turns filtration unit plus
miscellaneous head loss+ suction lift + Delivery lift.
Required Head of pump= 10 + 1.9 + 0.4+ 0.9+20+ 0+ 17 = 40.2 ≈ 41m
Assume Pump efficiency = 60 %
Required Discharge= 2.56 /0.6= 4.26 ≈ 4.3 Lps
Motor Selection
Motor selection is done by using equation 13.9. Efficiency of the motor is kept at
75% according to supplier.
Q×H
Hp =
76 × efficiency
4.3 × 41
Hp =
76 × 0.75
Hp=3.09 ≈ 3Hp
Source of water may be surface or groundwater. Bacterial growth and algae are major
problems associated with surface water use. These algae content form aggregate that
can clog emitters. Groundwater contains a greater concentration of minerals that can
clog the system by precipitation. The acidification and chlorination are used to
unclog emitters.
[Link] Filtration
The major problem with drip irrigation is clogging of emitters by chemical and
biological materials. Drip irrigation has low flow rates and extremely small passages
(emitter) for water these passages are easily clogged with organic and mineral
particles carried out irrigation water and by chemical precipitates and biological
growth, that develop within the system, clogging adversely affects the performance
of drip irrigation system, resulting in less flow than the designed thus affecting the
Drainage Requirements of Irrigated Land 291
To remove these impurities, some arrangement techniques for filtration and some
filters are used.
Types of Filtration
a) Settling Ponds: These can be used to remove large volumes of sand and silt. Algal
growth and windblown contaminants in the pool cause more filtration problem than
sediment, therefore, open water from a pond supply should be avoided. If water is
drawn from the pool, it must be chemically treated or filtered through a combination
of filters and screens. Minimum 15 minutes are required for most in-organic particles
larger than 80 microns to settle.
b) Hydrocyclone Filter: These filters remove 98% of the sand particles that would
be removed by 200 mesh screen. It depends upon the centrifugal force to remove or
eject high density particles from the water. Hydrocyclone filters cannot remove
organic materials.
d) Screen Filter
As most of the impurities in water are filtered by hydrocyclone and sand media filter,
screen filters are provided as a safeguard against any physical impurities left
unfiltered from hydrocyclone and sand media filter. The screen filter usually contains
cylindrical screens, which filters physical impurities and allows only clean water to
enter the drip irrigation system. The screens are mostly made of plastic material and
non-corrosive metal as shown in Fig. 13.9. The screen filters are available in market
with screen sizes ranging from 20 mesh to 200 mesh with different flow rate
capacities.
[Link] Chemical Treatment of Drip Irrigation System
To prevent drip irrigation emitters from clogging due to mineral precipitations and
inorganic particles, timely and regular application of chemicals is often required.
These chemicals included acids and chlorine.
(i) Acidification
The injection rate of acids should be adjusted in such a way so that the pH of
irrigation water reaches just below 4.0 to prevent magnesium and calcium
precipitates from aggregate forming. The amount of acid required to treat a system
depends on (a) the strength of the acid being used (b) the target pH and (c) the
buffering capacity of the irrigation water. A “titration test” can be used to determine
the optimum volume of acids needed to get the desired pH of water and prevent plat
roots from any damage.
(ii) Chlorination
Treatment of drip irrigation system with chlorine such as chlorine gas or liquid
sodium hypochlorite (household bleach) is known as Chlorination. To decompose
and remove Bacteria, algae and fungi from drip irrigation laterals and emitters,
chlorine is used as a powerful oxidizing agent. When chlorine is dissolved in water,
hydrolysis reaction occurs where chlorine molecules combine with water. The
hydrolysis reaction produces hypochlorous acid (HOCl) as shown in Eq.13.10.
H2O + Cl2 = HOCl + H+ + Cl− (13.10)
Drainage Requirements of Irrigated Land 295
2. It provides better control over water application convenient for giving light
and frequent irrigations and water application efficiency approaching 80%.
3. It saves 10 to 16% land by eliminating channels and ridges needed in other
methods.
4. Sandy soils (permeable soils) as well as sandy clay soils (Less permeable
soils) can be easily irrigated by this method, without any risk of inundation,
erosion and seepage losses.
5. The system saves the extra labor required for the application of fertilizers,
pesticides and weedicides.
6. It is suitable for irrigating the crops with very high plant population per unit
area. It is most suitable for vegetable, oil and cereal crops.
7. The system permits partial or full portability, wherever required.
8. Lesser chances of clogging of sprinkler nozzles as compared to drip
irrigation system.
9. The system is flexible to permit very light application of water for less than
1 inch depth, which is not possible with surface irrigation systems
operating pressures of about 0.5 to 2.5 kg/cm2. The pressure required for the system
can be attained by connecting the system to an overhead tank. The sprays are directed
at both sides of the pipe and can cover a strip of land from 6 to 15 meters wide
depending upon the pressure applied. The water is applied at a relatively high rate,
and therefore, it is suitable for soils having moderate infiltration rates. These systems
are suited for irrigation of lawns, gardens and small vegetable fields and other plants
when the crop height does not exceed from 40 to 60 cm. The water should be cleaned
through a filter to prevent clogging of the small perforations.
[Link] Side Roll System
To irrigate rectangular fields, mostly side roll sprinkler systems are used. It consists
of a wheel with lateral lines mounted on it with a pipe forming the axle. A driving
unit (engine), located near the center of the lateral, is used to move the system during
irrigation along the length of field. The height of system is controlled by wheel
diameter according to crop height so that system can move without any obstruction.
[Link] Rain-gun System
These are high performance impact sprinklers designed for a variety of uses and
applications where relatively high flows and extended radius of throw are desired.
Rain gun systems use large volume sprinklers operating at relatively high pressures
(3-6 Bars), mounted on a riser stand or towed through the field (Fig. 13.12). The
operating pressure of rain guns usually ranges between 2.0 to 7.5 kg/cm2 and flows
of 3 to 30 L/s usually with nozzle diameters ranging from 10 to 30 mm and with a
wetting radius of 27 to 60 m (Tajuddin & Somasundaram, 2012). It gives the
extraordinary pressure at all operating levels, works smoothly and uniformly over
the whole nozzle pressure range. Excellent hydraulic design, large barrel cross
section and full size taper bore nozzle allows maximum possible throw and
performance. Almost no maintenance is required. It can be adjusted to different
stream, break-up frequencies and to various rotation speeds to optimize the water
distribution. Variable trajectory angle option allows the changing trajectory angle of
various ranges, thus providing more uniformity even in windy conditions. It is mostly
recommended for the field crops like Sugarcane, Pulses, Oil Seeds, Cereals, Tea,
Coffee and Vegetables, etc.
There are three types of rain-gun sprinkler irrigation system that are: (a) Permanent
System (b) Semi-Permanent System and (c) Portable System. In permanent systems,
the rain-gun riser stands are installed permanently and fitted to solid set pipeline
network. Riser can also be supported by a cement concrete block around it. In semi-
permanent system pipeline network, can be permanent and rain-gun riser stand or
only rain-gun shifts from one location to another. In this type of systems, the rain-
gun riser stand can be detachable. In portable system, entire pipeline network, along
with the rain-gun riser stand and rain-gun, can be shifted from one location to
another. Easily detachable quick-connect pipes are used for this purpose.
Drainage Requirements of Irrigated Land 301
a. Soil Type: Soil is natural formation that can absorb water in between its
pore spaces. As the pore spaces varies with different soil types, so the water
holding and water intake capacity of soil varies with different soil types.
The soil infiltration rate (intake rate) influences the type of sprinkler that
can be used. The water holding capacity (field capacity) of soil greatly
affects the irrigation schedule. The sprinklers are not suitable for soils which
have low infiltration rate (clay soils). If sprinkler irrigation is the only
method available in that area, then low discharge sprinklers should be used.
The larger sprinklers producing larger water droplets are to be avoided to
save the soil structure.
b. Water Supply: The irrigation practices are influenced by the quality and
quantity of the water source. During the growing season, frequent
irrigations are suited for small discharge water supplies with low irrigation
depth, whereas irrigation frequency should be less for large water supplies
with more irrigation depth. The water quality also affects irrigation
scheduling. The trace elements like boron or selenium along with water
salinity can affect the irrigation scheduling of crops. The application of poor
quality water must be frequent and low discharged than the application of
good quality water.
c. Crop and Its Water Requirement: Sprinkler irrigation is suited for field
crops and small tree crops. During irrigation, sprinkler can spray water over
or under the crop canopy. However, large sprinklers are not recommended
for irrigation of delicate crops such as lettuce because the large water drops
produced by the sprinklers may damage the crop.
[Link] Selection of Sprinkler Nozzles
The sprinkler operating pressure, size of field and shape of field affects the selection
of nozzles for irrigation. Rotary nozzle type sprinklers are preferred for pressure less
than 40 PSI static. If the area to be watered is greater than 25 ft x 30 ft, rotors may
be the best solution. Rotors are not suited for sharp curve edges (less than 20 ft
radius). If the area beyond the edge should not get water on it, smaller rotary nozzle
or spray-type sprinkler may be adopted. In Table 7, some sprinkler nozzles and their
specifications are given.
Example:
Given:
i. System irrigation requirement: 1.5 inches (38 mm) per week.
ii. Days available for irrigation: 3 days.
iii. Sprinkler performance: 3.5 gpm (0.79 m3/h) full circle, radius = 14 ft (4 m).
iv. Sprinkler spacing: 13 x 15 ft (4 m x 5 m) rectangular.
Determine the precipitation rate and operation time of the circuit.
96.3›3.5 gpm
PR 1.73 in/hr
13′›15′
. Ý> ^%†Ý>
› 18min 3days
•Þ ßT
OT 17.3 or or
1.73
Ý>
›
•8:X day wk
ßT •Þ
Example: Design permanent sprinkler irrigation for a farmer field. The following
information was collected after field survey:
i. Total area= 56×42= 0.58 m2 (About half acre)
ii. Soil type= Sandy loam
iii. Crop= Maize
iv. Water source is 3 m deep from G.S
Solution:
According to crop (maize) and soil type select sprinkler gun PY-20 (0.66 Lps, 20 m
dia throw, 4 bar operating pressure)
306 S. Ali and M. M. Alam
Take 30% overlap area (to cover 100% space between sprinkler guns in case of row
crops)
Sprinkler in one lateral= 3
Total laterals on main line= 4
Total sprinkler= 3×4= 12
Sprinkler discharge= 0.66 Lps
Total pump discharge= 12×0.66= 8 Lps
Head loss calculation by Hazen-William equation:
Main line= 1.6 (76.2 mm dia) (1.2 m/100 m)
Lateral line= 3.3 (18 mm dia)
Total head loss= Sprinkler operating pressure+ Main line head loss+ Lateral Head
loss+ Suction lift+ Delivery lift
Total head loss= 40+1.6 +3.3 + 3+0= 47.9 ≈ 48 m
s∗v
Power requirement= Hp =
L^∗ ¯WWÝSݯ>S:
∗#
Hp =
L^∗ ^%%
Hp = 8.42
References
Bucks, D.A., D.S. Nakayama and R.G. Gilbert (1979). Trickle irrigation water
quality and preventive maintenance. Agric. Water Manage., 2:149-162.
Keller, J. and R.D. Bliesner (1990). Sprinkle and trickle irrigation. p. 652. Van
Nostrand Reinhold. New York, USA.
Keller, J. (2002). Evolution of drip/microirrigation: traditional and non-traditional
uses. Advances in Drip/Micro Irrigation workshop.2-5 [Link] de la
Cruz, Tenerife, Spain.
Leeds-Harrison, P.B., R.J. Rickson (1992). Field drainage in non-temperate climate.
In: Drainage Design (End. P. Smart and J.G. Herbertson), Blackie and Sons,
New York, USA.
PARC (2001). Pressurized irrigation system and innovation adaptation. Water
Resources Research Institute, National Agri. Res. Centre, Islamabad.
Storlie, C.A. (1995). Using irrigation water tests to predict and prevent clogging of
drip irrigation systems. A fact sheet by Rutgers Coop Res. & Ext., NJAES,
Rutgers. The State University, New Jersey.
Tajuddin, A. and S. Somasundaram (2012). Raingun sprinkler proves economical.
[Link]
conomical/[Link] (Accessed on 14, August 2016).