0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views2 pages

Understanding Planetary Orbits and Velocity

Yes, the initial velocity of planets is what allows them to maintain stable orbits around the Sun rather than spiraling inward. Planets move in elliptical orbits due to the inverse square law of gravitational attraction. Their initial velocities when they first formed provided them with just enough angular momentum to balance out gravitational forces and remain in orbit. This orbital velocity must be maintained to prevent objects from losing altitude and crashing into the central body.

Uploaded by

Pantsik Grifoi
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views2 pages

Understanding Planetary Orbits and Velocity

Yes, the initial velocity of planets is what allows them to maintain stable orbits around the Sun rather than spiraling inward. Planets move in elliptical orbits due to the inverse square law of gravitational attraction. Their initial velocities when they first formed provided them with just enough angular momentum to balance out gravitational forces and remain in orbit. This orbital velocity must be maintained to prevent objects from losing altitude and crashing into the central body.

Uploaded by

Pantsik Grifoi
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Panos <neurobio@[Link].

gr> writes:

>If the only force applied between a planet and the Sun is gravity, why
>don't planets crush into the Sun in a spiral orbit ?

To a good first approximation, one can ignore the finite size of the
planet, the finite size of the sun, and the perturbations from other planets.
Other perturbations such as light pressure and the solar wind are truly
negligible. The motion is therefore (to a good first approximation) that
of a point mass moving in a gravitational potential proportional to 1/R
(i.e., a force proportional to 1/R^2). Isaac Newton showed that the
orbits in such a field can be ellipses, but not spirals.

>Does their initial velocity have anything to do with it ?

Yes. It determines whether the orbit is circular, elliptical, parabolic,


hyperbolic, or along a straight line. Planets are thought to have had
approximately circular orbits when they first came into existence.

>Must all the satellites to have such a velocity to keep their orbit ?

I can't make sense out of this question. Would you care to rephrase it?
--
Ben Carter internet address: bpc@[Link]

The velocity tangent to Sun exactly balances the gravity attraction


perpendicular to the motion, so the free-falling body stays in a
circular path until disturbed enough by a new force to lose its stable
orbit. All satellites in the same orbit will need the same speed,
regardless of their mass. Some comets do not have enough radial
velocity and they do crush into Sun.

Dear Panos:
The planets ARE always falling towards the sun (otherwise, they'd be
making a bee-line out of the solar system). But they don't spiral in (much)
because there's no drag on them. When there IS drag, as of artificial
satellites in lower orbits around the earth, those satellites do indeed
spiral in.
Yes initial velocity has much to do with it. Angular momentum is
conserved.

The short answer is "yes" it is entirely dependent on a planet, or in fact


any body in orbit about another, having a specific velocity at a specific
point in its orbital position. It is also dependent on there being no
atmosphere or equivalent through which the orbiting object must move thus
experiencing friction which would slow it down and cause it to fall inwards
eventually impacting the body about which it was in orbit.

Objects in orbit are often said to be "in free fall" and in fact that is a
very apt description of their state. Imagine an airless, perfectly smooth,
body the size of the Earth upon which is standing a very strong space
suited experimenter. He/she throws an object parallel to the surface uon
whcih they are standing. The object is pulled by gravity towards the centre
of this "earth" and falls in a parabolic arc. If it is thrown with modest
speed it lands relatively close to the experimenter but as the force of the
throw increases the distance it travels increases. But the surface of the
planet is spherical so as distance away from the starting point increases
the distance the thrown object must fall increases because of the curvature
of the surface. If the experimenter has superhuman strength or some sort of
"launching mechanism" which allows the thrown object to be thrown at a very
great speed then the objacts downward curved path as it falls doesn't curve
fast enough to hit the surface and instead it falls endlessly in an orbit
about the planet. Of course to put something into orbit about the real
Earth we need to take it high enough to get it outside the atmosphere so we
can't out something in orbit at chest height. On the Moon we would have to
get high enough off the surface to clear the mountains.

-- Regards --
sidlee@[Link]
Sid Lee - Calgary, Alberta, Canada (51d N, 114d West)

Common questions

Powered by AI

For an object to enter a stable orbit around a planet without an atmosphere, it needs to be projected with precise velocity and direction such that its centrifugal force balances the gravitational pull of the planet. The initial speed and angle must ensure the object's path follows an elliptical or circular trajectory rather than falling back to the planet or escaping into space .

Atmospheric drag acts as a frictional force on an artificial satellite, causing it to lose energy and, as a result, reducing its orbital speed. This reduction in speed decreases the centrifugal force that counteracts gravitational attraction, eventually causing the satellite to spiral into the Earth as it descends to lower altitudes .

Some comets fall into the Sun because they lack sufficient tangential velocity to maintain a stable orbit. Unlike planets, which have the appropriate balance of velocity and gravitational pull, comets may follow more eccentric orbits that bring them too close to the Sun, resulting in their capture or collision due to reduced speed and increased gravitational attraction .

Angular momentum is conserved in celestial orbits, meaning that the product of the velocity of the planet and its distance from the Sun remains constant. This conservation ensures that if a planet moves closer to the Sun, it speeds up, and if it moves further away, it slows down, allowing the maintenance of a stable orbit without spiraling into the Sun, assuming no other forces act upon it .

If a planet's tangential velocity decreases significantly, it would no longer be able to counterbalance the gravitational pull of the Sun, leading to a reduction in its orbital radius. The planet would spiral inwards towards the Sun until potentially colliding with it, assuming no other forces compensate for the velocity loss .

The curvature of a planet's surface affects a high-velocity projectile in such a way that, as the object's velocity increases, the surface curvature causes the object to fall further horizontally before it meets the ground. If the velocity is sufficient, the object's path becomes an orbit instead of a parabolic trajectory, as the curvature of the falling path matches the curvature of the planet's surface .

Planets do not spiral into the Sun because the motion of a planet is a balance between its gravitational attraction towards the Sun and its tangential velocity. This results in an elliptical orbit rather than a spiral. The orbit is maintained because there is no atmospheric drag in space to slow the planet down, thus the gravitational pull does not draw the planet inwards in a spiral path .

To establish orbit around Earth, it is necessary to reach a high altitude to avoid atmospheric drag, which would slow the object and cause it to fall back to Earth. In contrast, a smaller celestial body, like the Moon, does not have an atmosphere, thus requiring the object to only clear physical obstructions, allowing for easier orbital paths at lower altitudes .

A perfectly smooth, airless body can maintain objects in orbit if the object is projected with a velocity that matches the gravitational curvature of the body. Without atmospheric drag, objects in orbit maintain their velocity and path indefinitely due to conservation of angular momentum and lack of frictional forces .

The initial velocity of a planet determines the shape of its orbit. If the velocity is appropriate, the orbit can be circular or elliptical. If the velocity is too high, the path can become parabolic or hyperbolic, potentially leading the planet to exit the solar system. The correct initial velocity ensures that the gravitational pull of the Sun is balanced by the planet’s inertia, maintaining a stable orbit .

You might also like