0% found this document useful (2 votes)
99 views12 pages

Microeconomics Problem Set 2 Analysis

This document provides instructions and problems for Problem Set 2 of the Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A) course. It includes 3 problems related to pharmaceutical company pricing, super computer pricing, and estimating demand for Mrs. Smyth's frozen fruit pies using linear regression. Students are asked to show their work and provide numerical answers for questions within each problem. The goal is to challenge students to think critically about microeconomic concepts.

Uploaded by

ffs
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (2 votes)
99 views12 pages

Microeconomics Problem Set 2 Analysis

This document provides instructions and problems for Problem Set 2 of the Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A) course. It includes 3 problems related to pharmaceutical company pricing, super computer pricing, and estimating demand for Mrs. Smyth's frozen fruit pies using linear regression. Students are asked to show their work and provide numerical answers for questions within each problem. The goal is to challenge students to think critically about microeconomic concepts.

Uploaded by

ffs
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Problem Set 2
  • Problem 2: Super Computer Pricing
  • Problem 3: Mrs. Smyth's Demand
  • Data Tables

Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A)

Problem Set 2
(100 points)

Note: these exercises are more difficult than the typical exercises from the exam. These
problem sets are designed to be solved in groups and with plenty of time. In contrast, the exam
will include short multiple-choice questions that are meant to be solved quickly and
individually. Some of the exercises in the problem sets can be challenging. The goal is to
challenge you to think critically instead of asking you to apply formulas like a robot. If your
group gets stuck with a question, just email the GSI for help.

Submission instructions: Please submit this problem set by the due date in the appropriate
assignment in bCourses. Problem sets and all pages must be submitted as one PDF file. You can
either fill in your answers digitally on the PDF, or print out the problem set, write your answers,
and then scan it for submission.

Problem 1. Pharmaceutical company pricing (40 points)


A pharmaceutical company faces the following demand function for one of its products in the
American market:
QA = 2,000,000 − 20,000PA
where QA is the number of prescriptions sold in the American market annually and PA is the
price per prescription. The firm's annual total cost function is:
TC A = $40,000,000 + $5QA
The company is considering also entering the Brazilian market where the demand for the
pharmaceutical is:
QB = 200,000 − 3,000PB
The cost function for the Brazilian market is:
TC B = $1,000,000 + $5QB

1
Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A)

a. Calculate the firm's optimal price in the US. Show your work.

Q = 2,000,000 – 20,000P
P = 100 – 0.00005Q

TR = P x Q

TR = (100 – 0.00005Q)*Q

TR = 100Q – 0.00005Q^2

MR = ∂TR / ∂Q = 100 – 0.0001Q

TC = 40,000,000 = 5Q
MC = ∂TC / ∂Q = 5

MR = MC

5 = 100 – 0.0001Q

-95 = -0.0001Q

950,000 = Q
Substitute Q back into demand function:

P = 100 – 0.00005(950,000) P = 100 – 47.5

P = $52.5

ANSWER MUST FIT INSIDE THIS BOX

2
Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A)

b. What is the optimal price to charge in the Brazilian market? Show your work.

ANSWER MUST FIT INSIDE THIS BOX

c. Explain why the problem of parallel imports, a form of arbitrage, may result from the
pricing structure you have calculated in the previous questions.

ANSWER MUST FIT INSIDE THIS BOX

3
Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A)

d. To address the problem of parallel imports, the company is considering two options: 1)
implementing uniform pricing, or 2) paying $1,500,000 annually to implement a
program to monitor US clinics to ensure its products imported from Brazil are not sold in
the US. What should it do to maximize profits? Explain.

ANSWER MUST FIT INSIDE THIS BOX


4
Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A)

Problem 2. Super Computer Pricing (20 points)

You are an executive for Super Computer, Inc. (SC), which rents out super computers. SC
receives a fixed rental payment per time period in exchange for the right to unlimited
computing at a rate of P cents per second. SC has two types of potential customers of equal
number—10 businesses and 10 academic institutions. Each business customer has the demand
function Q=10 - P, where Q is in millions of seconds per month; each academic institution has
the demand Q=8-P. The marginal cost to SC of additional computing is 2 cents per second,
regardless of volume.

a. Suppose that you could separate business and academic customers. What rental fee and
usage fee would you charge each group? What would be your profits?

5
ANSWER MUST FIT INSIDE THIS BOX
Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A)

b. Suppose you were unable to keep the two types of customers separate and charged a
zero rental fee. What usage fee would maximize your profits? What would be your
profits?

ANSWER MUST FIT INSIDE THIS BOX

6
Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A)

Problem 3. Mrs. Smyth’s Demand (40 points)

In early 2002, Mrs. Smyth’s, a Chicago-based food company, initiated an empirical estimation of
demand for its gourmet frozen fruit pies. The firm wants to formulate pricing and promotional
plans for the future on the basis of historical data, and management is interested in learning
how pricing and promotional decisions might affect sales. Mrs. Smyth’s has been marketing
frozen fruit pies for several years, and its market research department has collected quarterly
data over two years for six important marketing areas, including unit sales quantity, the retail
price charged for the pies, local advertising and promotional expenditures, and the price
charged by a major competing brand of frozen pies. Statistical data published by the U.S.
Census Bureau on population and disposable income in each of the six market areas were also
available for analysis. It was therefore possible to include a wide range of hypothesized
demand determinants in an empirical estimation of fruit pie demand. These data appear in the
table below.

1. Run one linear regression of the following form using all these data (also available in Excel
format on the course website) and report the equation with the estimated coefficients.
Qit = b0 + b1Pit + b2Ait + b3PXit + b4Yit + b5Popit + b6Tit
The subscript i indicates the regional market from which the observation was taken, whereas
the subscript t represents the quarter during which the observation occurred.

Where:
Q is the quantity of pies sold during the t th quarter
P is the retail price in dollars of Mrs. Smyth’s frozen pies
A represents the dollars spent for advertising;
PX is the price, measured in dollars, charged for competing fruit pies
Y is dollars of disposable income per capita
Pop is the population of the market area
T is the trend factor (2000-1 = 1,…, 2001-4 = 8)

ANSWER MUST FIT INSIDE THIS BOX


7
Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A)

2. Please interpret each of the coefficients in the regressions results. For each coefficient,
discuss both the sign as well as its magnitude (e.g., if we were to increase X by Z units, the
variable Y would increase/decrease by …).

ANSWER MUST FIT INSIDE THIS BOX

8
Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A)

3. Can you explain intuitively the meaning of the coefficient of determination (R2) for the Mrs.
Smyth’s frozen fruit pie demand equation. Does it suggest that demand is mostly
predictable or unpredictable?

ANSWER MUST FIT INSIDE THIS BOX

4. Use the results from question 1 to estimate 2002-1 unit sales in the Washington, DC-
Baltimore, MD, market under the following assumptions:
a. P = $7.20
b. A = $30,000
c. PX = $6.00
d. Y = $43,000
e. Pop: Same as in prior period

ANSWER MUST FIT INSIDE THIS BOX

9
Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A)

5. Using the regression output, please estimate the demand elasticity under the above
conditions (e.g., P = $7.20, A = $30,000, …). Use whatever elasticity formula you prefer (for
most people, it’s easier to use the point elasticity).

ANSWER MUST FIT INSIDE THIS BOX

6. Use the formula for marginal revenues as a function of the price elasticity. Calculate
marginal revenue under the above conditions (price of $7.20, …).

ANSWER MUST FIT INSIDE THIS BOX

7. Based on the answer to the previous item (i.e., marginal revenues), can you say whether the
price of $7.20 is profit-maximizing? If more information is needed, explain why.

ANSWER MUST FIT INSIDE THIS BOX

10
Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A)

Advertising Time
Year- Unit Price Expenditures Competitors' Income Variable
Quarter Sales (Q) ($) ($) Price ($) ($) Population (T)
Atlanta, GA 2000-1 193,334 6.39 15,827 6.92 33,337 4,116,250 1
2000-2 170,041 7.21 20,819 4.84 33,390 4,140,338 2
2000-3 247,709 5.75 14,062 5.28 33,599 4,218,965 3
2000-4 183,259 6.75 16,973 6.17 33,797 4,226,070 4
2001-1 282,118 6.36 18,815 6.36 33,879 4,278,912 5
2001-2 203,396 5.98 14,176 4.88 34,186 4,359,442 6
2001-3 167,447 6.64 17,030 5.22 35,691 4,363,494 7
2001-4 361,667 5.30 14,456 5.80 35,950 4,380,084 8

Chicago, IL, 2000-1 401,805 6.08 27,183 4.99 34,983 9,184,926 1


Gary, IN, 2000-2 412,312 6.13 27,572 6.13 35,804 9,237,683 2
Kenosha, WI 2000-3 321,972 7.24 34,367 5.82 35,898 9,254,182 3
2000-4 445,236 6.08 26,895 6.05 36,113 9,272,758 4
2001-1 479,713 6.40 30,539 5.37 36,252 9,300,401 5
2001-2 459,379 6.00 26,679 4.86 36,449 9,322,168 6
2001-3 444,040 5.96 26,607 5.29 37,327 9,323,331 7
2001-4 376,046 7.21 32,760 4.89 37,841 9,348,725 8

Dallas-Fort 2000-1 255,203 6.55 19,880 6.97 34,870 5,294,645 1


Worth, TX 2000-2 270,881 6.11 19,151 6.25 35,464 5,335,816 2
2000-3 330,271 5.62 15,743 6.03 35,972 5,386,134 3
2000-4 313,485 6.06 17,512 5.08 36,843 5,409,350 4
2001-1 311,500 5.83 16,984 5.29 37,573 5,409,358 5
2001-2 370,780 5.38 15,698 6.19 37,781 5,425,001 6
2001-3 152,338 7.41 22,057 6.94 37,854 5,429,300 7
2001-4 320,804 6.19 17,460 6.38 39,231 5,442,595 8

Los Angeles- 2000-1 738,760 5.75 42,925 5.54 28,579 16,381,600 1


Long Beach, CA 2000-2 707,015 6.61 50,299 6.73 28,593 16,544,289 2
2000-3 699,051 5.03 37,364 5.04 28,633 16,547,258 3
2000-4 628,838 6.76 50,602 4.61 28,833 16,553,958 4
2001-1 631,934 7.04 53,562 5.85 29,242 16,587,432 5
2001-2 651,162 6.70 48,911 5.63 29,876 16,680,782 6
2001-3 765,124 6.54 49,422 6.94 30,327 16,716,936 7
2001-4 741,364 5.73 44,061 6.37 30,411 16,717,938 8

11
Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A)

(Continued)
Minneapolis- 2000-1 291,773 5.35 13,896 5.78 29,778 2,972,443 1
St. Paul, MN 2000-2 153,018 6.33 27,429 4.73 30,079 2,974,275 2
2000-3 574,486 5.94 31,631 6.70 30,598 2,989,720 3
2000-4 75,396 7.00 39,176 4.58 30,718 3,020,244 4
2001-1 590,190 5.19 33,538 5.17 30,922 3,021,618 5
2001-2 288,112 7.02 53,643 5.15 31,199 3,025,298 6
2001-3 276,619 7.02 60,284 5.46 31,354 3,042,834 7
2001-4 522,446 5.23 53,595 6.06 31,422 3,063,011 8

Washington, DC, 2000-1 395,314 5.80 22,626 6.56 38,892 7,611,304 1


Baltimore, MD 2000-2 436,103 5.32 22,697 6.38 39,080 7,615,783 2
2000-3 336,338 6.35 25,475 4.53 39,510 7,666,220 3
2000-4 451,321 5.95 25,734 6.31 39,552 7,710,368 4
2001-1 352,181 6.01 23,777 6.24 39,776 7,713,007 5
2001-2 317,322 7.02 27,544 4.86 41,068 7,752,393 6
2001-3 422,455 5.71 23,852 4.86 47,471 7,754,204 7
2001-4 290,963 7.36 30,487 5.32 41,989 7,782,654 8

Average 391,917 6.24 29,204 5.70 34,625 7,706,365

12

Common questions

Powered by AI

In the US market, the demand function for the pharmaceutical product is given by QA = 2,000,000 – 20,000PA, indicating a higher sensitivity to price changes compared to the Brazilian market, where the demand function is QB = 3,000 – 200PB. The greater slope in the US demand curve suggests that sales will respond more significantly to price changes, necessitating careful optimization of prices to balance revenue and market penetration. The company would need to charge lower prices in markets with higher price sensitivity to maintain sales volumes .

The coefficient of determination (R²) measures how well the estimated regression equation accounts for variation in pie sales. A high R² value, close to 1, suggests that factors in the regression model, such as price, advertising, and competitors' pricing, explained most of the demand variation, indicating predictability. Conversely, a low R² would suggest unpredictable demand or omitted variable bias .

Super Computer, Inc. should charge business customers a higher rental and usage fee compared to academic institutions, due to the higher demand function (Q=10-P) in businesses. Specifically, charge a rental fee plus usage fee above the marginal cost for businesses, potentially setting P close to the intersection of marginal revenue and cost. For academics, a lower fee reflecting their demand (Q=8-P) ensures broader market capture while maintaining cost coverage .

The significant price difference between the US and Brazilian markets can lead to parallel imports, where products purchased at lower prices in Brazil are resold in the US market, undermining the company's pricing strategy. This arbitrage is facilitated by the ease of moving pharmaceuticals between countries, potentially leading to lost revenue and market disruptions in the higher-priced US market .

Super Computer, Inc. should set a usage fee that maximizes joint profit across both customer types, finding a rate that equates the sum of their marginal revenues to the marginal cost of 2 cents per second. Calculate the combined demand curve of both customer types and set a price where the total MR = MC. Leaving aside rental fees, focus on a pricing point that balances demand elasticity between the groups while exceeding marginal cost .

Management can leverage the regression analysis results by inputting hypothetical values for each determinant—price, advertising, competitor pricing, income, population, and trend—in new market conditions. The coefficients provide a predictive model to estimate sales by adjusting these inputs based on local market conditions. This exercise aids in understanding potential sales volumes, structuring promotional efforts, and setting competitive pricing strategies .

Each coefficient in the demand regression model represents the sensitivity of pie sales to changes in a corresponding variable. A positive sign on advertising expenditure implies that increasing advertising positively impacts sales; the magnitude indicates the sales volume change per dollar spent. Conversely, if the retail price has a significant negative coefficient, it suggests price reductions could substantially boost sales, guiding pricing decisions. Similarly, a competitor's price with a positive impact means competitive pricing can attract more customers .

The company should consider the cost of implementing uniform pricing versus the cost of monitoring U.S. clinics, which is $1,500,000 annually. Uniform pricing could lead to lost profits in markets willing to pay different prices and reduce competitiveness in price-sensitive regions. Monitoring, while costly, could protect higher US pricing by preventing arbitrage. The decision should weigh these financial implications, customer reaction, and potential loss of market share due to uniform pricing against the cost and effectiveness of the monitoring initiative .

Advertising expenditures, based on their positive coefficient from regression analysis, have a direct growth impact on unit sales. Assuming all other factors constant, increased dollars spent in advertising would enhance visibility and consumer persuasion, directly increasing sales volumes. By cost-effectively allocating $30,000 for advertising in the forecast, Mrs. Smyth can expect a proportional increase in forecasted sales, as derived from their regression model for this specific market .

To determine profit maximization at the price of $7.20, Mrs. Smyth should calculate and compare the marginal revenue (MR) at this price to marginal cost (MC). If MR equals MC, the price is optimal. Additional factors include demand elasticity—if demand is inelastic, prices above $7.20 may yield higher revenue. It's crucial to assess if any unaccounted factors could affect elasticity or cost structures, influencing the optimal price point .

Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A) 
 
 
1 
 
Problem Set 2 
(100 points) 
 
 
Note: these exercises are more difficult than the typi
Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A) 
 
 
2 
a. Calculate the firm's optimal price in the US. Show your work. 
 
 
ANSWER MUST FIT INS
Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A) 
 
 
3 
 
b. What is the optimal price to charge in the Brazilian market? Show your work. 
 
c. E
Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A) 
 
 
4 
 
d. To address the problem of parallel imports, the company is considering two options:
Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A) 
 
 
5 
 
 
Problem 2. Super Computer Pricing (20 points) 
 
You are an executive for Super Compu
Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A) 
 
 
6 
b. Suppose you were unable to keep the two types of customers separate and charged a 
zer
Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A) 
 
 
7 
 
 
Problem 3. Mrs. Smyth’s Demand (40 points) 
 
In early 2002, Mrs. Smyth’s, a Chicago-
Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A) 
 
 
8 
2. Please interpret each of the coefficients in the regressions results. For each coeffic
Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A) 
 
 
9 
3. Can you explain intuitively the meaning of the coefficient of determination (R2) for t
Microeconomics (EWMBA 201A) 
 
 
10 
5. Using the regression output, please estimate the demand elasticity under the above 
c

You might also like