0% found this document useful (0 votes)
124 views2 pages

Understanding Moral Character Traits

Moral character refers to the virtues and vices that comprise a person's moral disposition. It involves having stable character traits, such as honesty, courage, and compassion, that reliably predict how one will behave in certain situations. There are three major approaches to ethics - consequentialism focuses on outcomes, deontology on duties, and virtue ethics on character. Aristotle viewed moral character as excellence in meeting the mean between deficiencies and excesses of emotions and actions. For a trait to be a virtue, it must accord with moral norms and be informed by proper reasoning.

Uploaded by

Lai Singh
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
124 views2 pages

Understanding Moral Character Traits

Moral character refers to the virtues and vices that comprise a person's moral disposition. It involves having stable character traits, such as honesty, courage, and compassion, that reliably predict how one will behave in certain situations. There are three major approaches to ethics - consequentialism focuses on outcomes, deontology on duties, and virtue ethics on character. Aristotle viewed moral character as excellence in meeting the mean between deficiencies and excesses of emotions and actions. For a trait to be a virtue, it must accord with moral norms and be informed by proper reasoning.

Uploaded by

Lai Singh
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Module 4: Moral Character and Moral character”, and is sometimes translated as

Development “moral virtue”


 The subject of moral character belogs to
I. Moral Character
virtue theory more generally, which is the
 What is Moral Character? philosophical examination of notions related
 The term character comes from the ancient to the virtues.
Greek term charaktêr, which initially  Roger Crisp distinguishes virtue ethics and
referred to the mark impressed upon a coin. virtue theory:
 Charaktêr later came to refer more  “Virtue theory is the area of
generally to any distinctive feature by which inquiry concerned with the
one thing is distinguished from others. virtues in general; virtue
 A set of qualities or characteristics that ethics is narrower and
can be used to differentiate between prescriptive, and consists
persons, commonly used in literature. primarily in the advocacy of
 In philosophy, the term character is typically the virtues”
used to refer to the particularly moral  Virtue ethics is a sub-species of virtue theory
dimension of a person. insofar as the former attempts to base ethics
 Aristotle most often used the term ēthē for on evaluation of virtue.
character, which is etymologically linked to  Character and Three Major Approaches
“ethics” and “morality” to Ethics *3 major approaches to normative
 At the heart of one major approach to ethics ethics
– an approach counting among its  Consequentialism – is the
proponents Plato, Aristotle, Augustine and idea that the moral action is
Aquinas is the conviction that ethics is the one that produces the best
fundamentally related to what kind of consequences.
persons we are.  Deontological – morality is
 We can think of one’s moral character as primarily a function of duties
primarily a function of whether she has or or obligations, regardless of
lacks various moral virtues and vices. the consequences of acting in
 Virtues and vices that comprise one’s moral accordance with those duties.
character are typically understood as  Virtue – give primacy of
dispositions to behave in certain ways in importance not to rules, but
certain sorts of circumstances. to particular habits of
character such as the virtue of
 One could approach moral character
courage or the vice of greed.
primarily by focusing on standards set by
normative ethics; whether people can or do  A moral character trait is a character trait for
live up to these standards is irrelevant. which the agent is morally responsible.
 Aristotle’s discussion of moral character,  Moral responsibility: to be morally
particularly virtue, is the most influential responsible is to be deserving of the reactive
treatment of such issues. His discussion will attitudes.
be used as a beginning point.  Reactive attitudes can be
either positive (in cases of
 The Greek word used by Aristotle and most
moral praise, gratitude,
commonly translated as virtue is aretē,
respect, love) or negative (in
which is perhaps better translated as
cases of moral blame,
“goodness” or “excellence”
resentment, in-dignation)
 Aristotle’s phrase for the excellences of
character is ēthikē aretē, literally “virtue of
 Most work on moral responsibility has
focused on an agent’s responsibility for her
actions.
 A Traditional View of Moral Character
 Dispositions are particular
kinds of properties or
characteristics that objects
can possess
 Moral character traits are
those dispositions of
character for which it is
appropriate to hold agents
morally responsible.
 A trait for which the
agent is deserving of a
positive reactive attitude,
such as praise or gratitude, is
a virtue, and a vice is a trait
for which the agent is
deserving of a negative
reactive attitude, such as
resentment or blame.
Moral character traits
are relatively stable and
reliable dispositions, and thus
should be reasonably good
predictors over time of an
agent’s behavior if that agent
is in a trait-relevant situation.
Moral character traits
are not just dispositions to
engage in certain outward
behaviors; they can also be
dispositions to have certain
emotions or affections.
In order for a moral
character trait to be a virtue,
it must not only be in accord
with the relevant moral
norms, but the disposition
must also be informed by
proper reasoning about the
matter at hand.
 Three Central Features

Common questions

Powered by AI

Aristotle’s concept of moral character, which he refers to as ēthikē aretē or 'virtue of character,' encompasses the idea of moral virtues as dispositions to behave in particular ways within certain contexts. Virtue ethics, drawn from Aristotle’s philosophy, emphasizes these habits of character such as courage or moderation, rather than adhering strictly to rules or consequences . In contrast, modern views often separate the ethical evaluation of character into more specific virtues and vices, assessing moral responsibility through the stability and reliability of traits over time . This Aristotelian view is significant because it provides a holistic appreciation of character that links virtues with one's overall moral life, rather than evaluating actions on a case-by-case basis.

Roger Crisp distinguishes between virtue ethics and virtue theory by indicating that virtue ethics is a subset of virtue theory, with the former prescribing specific virtues and arguing for their ethical centrality. Meanwhile, virtue theory encompasses a broader inquiry into virtues, examining their nature and role without prioritizing the ethical supremacy of any particular virtue . This distinction implies that while virtue ethics actively recommends certain virtues as morally central, virtue theory provides a wider, exploratory framework that explores virtues' conceptual roles within moral philosophy, allowing for a comparative analysis across different ethical systems.

Aristotle's notion of ēthikē aretē, which underscores virtues as 'moral excellences,' informs the interface of personal qualities and societal moral norms by proposing that the cultivation of virtues is intrinsic to one's character development and societal cohesion . His philosophy suggests that personal virtues not only define individual moral character but also collectively shape social standards of morality. By highlighting that individuals are ethically molded through societal frameworks, Aristotle’s analysis points to virtues as both personal aspirations and social expectations, thus bridging individual moral growth with communal ethical structures.

The idea of moral virtues as stable dispositions contributes significantly to ethical analysis by framing behaviors as reflections of one's ethical makeup over time rather than discrete actions. This view allows for a deeper understanding of ethical behavior as a holistic and stable expression of character, emphasizing long-term cultivation of virtues like courage and honesty . Philosophically, this positions moral evaluation within the context of sustained ethical development, suggesting that truly virtuous behavior is a manifestation of ingrained moral quality, not merely occasional adherence to rules. Thus, ethics becomes an ongoing practice of self-refinement, reinforcing consistent moral identity over temporal adherence to ethical prescriptions.

Reactive attitudes define the emotional responses that hold individuals morally responsible for their character traits. If an individual's trait leads to positive actions, this could elicit praise or gratitude, hence considered a virtue. Conversely, negative traits lead to resentment or blame, marking them as vices . These attitudes underline the social dimensions of moral evaluation, emphasizing which traits society deems responsible for moral respect or indignation. Essentially, they serve as societal feedback mechanisms that guide individuals in aligning their dispositions with ethical and moral standards.

Aristotle's definition of 'virtue' as aretē, implying 'goodness' or 'excellence,' directly influences contemporary virtue ethics by shifting focus from rule-based ethics to the excellence of character traits. This broader conceptualization asks individuals to develop their virtues not merely by rules or outcomes but through continuous character development . Modern virtue ethics builds on this by advocating for a consistent and holistic self-improvement approach, emphasizing moral character as a product of cultivating virtues over time, deeply rooted in social and individual contexts.

Dispositions are inherent qualities or tendencies to act and feel in certain ways. Moral character traits are specific types of dispositions for which individuals can be held morally responsible, suggesting a stable and predictive pattern of behavior . These traits, such as honesty or deceit, are not merely outward behaviors; they also include emotional dispositions, which should align with moral norms. This relationship emphasizes that moral character requires a consistent alignment of emotions, reasoning, and actions with ethical standards, reflecting a comprehensive view of one's moral life.

Consequentialism assesses moral responsibility based on the outcomes of actions. If an action leads to the best consequences, it is considered the most ethical, regardless of the agent's intent or character. Deontology focuses on adherence to duties or obligations, making morality a function of whether an action conforms to these duties, rather than its consequences . Virtue ethics, however, evaluates moral responsibility by prioritizing the agent's character, emphasizing virtues like courage or honesty over strict rule adherence or outcomes. Thus, each approach provides a distinct lens for assessing ethical actions, with virtue ethics uniquely focusing on moral character rather than just actions or results.

Virtues and vices in moral character are differentiated based on the deservedness of reactive attitudes. Virtues elicit positive reactions, such as praise, for aligning traits with moral norms, while vices invoke negative reactions like blame for moral failures . Proper reasoning informs this differentiation by ensuring that virtues are not just inclination-driven but are instead guided by sound moral judgments. This reasoning aspect means that a moral character trait must not only exist but be substantively informed by rational consideration to be deemed a virtue.

The traditional view sees moral character as a stable and reliable predictor of future behavior, underpinning expectations that individuals will act consistently according to their character traits when in relevant situations . This understanding implies that individuals are morally responsible for actions that reveal their character, as these actions reflect stable dispositions rather than isolated decisions. Hence, holding someone morally accountable relies on the expectation that character-based traits inform future conduct, legitimizing praise or blame for their continued patterns of action.

You might also like