Types and Flow in Steam Nozzles
Types and Flow in Steam Nozzles
c12 c2
h1 + = h2 + 2
2 2
c2 = 2( h1 − h2 ) + c12 (6.2a)
Usually c1 = 0,
2
A1
A2
c1
c2
p2
p1
v2
v1 Exit
Entry
2n
c2 = ( p v − p2 v2 )
n − 1 1 1
A 2 2n
ṁ = ( p v − p2 v2 )
v2 n − 1 1 1
A2 2n
= ( p v − p2 v2 )
1 n − 1 1 1
p1 n
v1
p2
1
2 n +1 2
= A2 2 n p2 p2 n p2 n (6.4)
−
n − 1 v1 p1 p1
2 n +1
p2 n p2 n d
or − =0
p2 p1 p1
d
p1
2 n +1
−1 −1
2 p n n + 1 p2 n
or 2 − =0
n p1 n p1
2−n 1
2 p n n + 1 p2 n
or 2 =
n p1 n p1
n 2−n
p n + 1 p2
2
or =
p1 2 p1
1− n n
p n + 1
2
or =
p 1 2
n n
p n + 1 1− n 2 n −1
or 2 = = (6.5)
p1 2 n + 1
Equation (6.5) gives the critical pressure ratio at which the discharge through the nozzle is maximum.
p
For saturated steam, n = 1.135, then 2 = 0.5774 (6.5a)
p1
p
For superheated steam, n = 1.3, then 2 = 0.5457 (6.5b)
p1
1
1− n 2
2n 2n p2 n
Now, c2 = ( p v − p2 v2 ) = p2 v2 − 1
n − 1 1 1 n − 1
1 p
p2
Substituting for from Eq. (6.5), we get
p1
1 1
2n n + 1 2 2n n − 1 2
c2 = p2 v2 − 1 = p2 v2
n −1 2
n −1 2
2n 2n
= ⋅ np1v1 = ⋅ nRT1
n + 1 n + 1
2n
= c (6.7)
n + 1 s1
where cs1 = velocity of sound at entry of nozzle.
1
n +1
−1
1− n 2
2n p1 2 n −1 2 n −1
= A 2 −
n − 1 v1 n + 1 n + 1
1
n +1 2
−1
2n p1 2 n −1 2
= A 2 − 1
n − 1 v1 n + 1 n + 1
1
n +1 2
2n p1 2 n −1 n + 1
= A 2 − 1
n − 1 v1 n + 1 2
1
n +1 2
2n p1 2 n −1 n − 1
= A 2
n − 1 v1 n + 1
2
1
n +1 2
np1 2 n −1
= A2 (6.8)
v n + 1
1
As p2 is gradually reduced, the discharge gradually increases and becomes maximum as critical
pressure is approached, as shown in Fig. 6.3.
Maximum discharge
Discharge
Most of these losses occur beyond the throat in the divergent section of the nozzle as the length and the
velocity of steam is much higher there. The effects of these friction losses are as follows:
1. The expansion does not remain isentropic and the enthalpy drop is reduced, resulting in lower exit
velocity.
2. The final dryness fraction of steam is increased as a part of kinetic energy gets converted into heat
due to friction and is absorbed by steam, which increases the enthalpy.
3. The specific volume of steam is increased due to frictional reheating.
The effect of friction of steam flow through a nozzle is shown in h–s (Mollier) diagram in
Fig. 6.4. The point A represents the initial condition of steam and the point E represents the throat of a
convergent–divergent nozzle. AB represents the isentropic expansion without friction, and AC repre-
sents the expansion with friction. Isentropic enthalpy drop is (hA – hC) and actual enthalpy drop with
friction is (hA – hc). If the actual enthalpy drop as percentage of theoretical enthalpy drop is known,
then point C can be located. However, expansion must end at same pressure as at B. The horizontal
line drawn through C to cut the back pressure line pb at point D represents the final condition of steam.
The h–s diagram shows that the dryness fraction of steam at point D is greater than that at point B and
the specific volume of steam also increases.
Most of the friction occurs in the divergent part of the nozzle and actual expansion is represented
by the line AED. AE represents the expansion in the convergent part, whereas ED represents in the
divergent part of the nozzle. Lines AEB and AED represent expansion of steam for initially saturated
steam. Likewise, A1E1B1 and A1E1D1 are for initially superheated steam.
h
A1
A E1
D1 x = 1
D B1
B C
= 44.72 K ( ∆h)isen
where K = hn .
h
p1
A p2
B
p3
B1 pb
C
Supersaturated
field
E D
x=1
Wilson line
s
Example 6.1
Steam expands from 2.5 bar to 1 bar in a nozzle. The initial velocity of steam is 80 m/s and initial
temperature is 200°C. Taking nozzle efficiency as 96%, find the exit velocity.
Solution
Given that p1 = 2.5 bar, p2 = 1 bar, c1 = 80 m/s, t1 = 200°C, hn = 0.96
The h – s diagram is shown in Fig. 6.6.
From steam tables for superheated steam, we have
h1 = 2868 kJ/kg at p1 = 2.5 bar and 200°C
s1 = 7.3593 kJ/kg.K
At p2 = 1 bar, sf 2 = 1.3025 kJ/kg.K and sfg2 = 6.0568 kJ/kg.K
Since s1 > sfg2, steam is superheated. At 1 bar and s1 = 7.3593 kJ/kg.K, the enthalpy for superheated
steam by interpolation is:
2776.4 − 2676.2
h2 = (7.3593 – 7.3614) + 2676.2
7.6133 − 7.3614
= 2691.95 kJ/kg
h
2.5 bar
1 1 bar
h1
h2′
h2 2 2′
Example 6.2
Superheated steam enters a convergent–divergent nozzle at 20 bar and 300°C. The exit pressure is
4.5 bar. Assuming frictionless flow up to the throat (pv1.3 = const.) and a nozzle efficiency of 90%,
determine (a) the flow rate for a throat area of 30 cm2 and (b) exit area.
Solution
Given that p1 = 20 bar, t1 = 300°C, p3 = 4.5 bar, hn = 0.9, A2 = 30 cm2
n 1.3
p 2 n −1 2 0.3
Critical pressure ratio, 2 = = = 0.5457
p1 n + 1 2.3
Throat pressure, p2 = 20 × 0.5457 = 10.91 bar
From Mollier diagram (Fig. 6.7), we get
h1 = 3025 kJ/kg, h2 = 2880 kJ/kg, v2 = 0.2 m3/kg, h3 = 2700 kJ/kg, vs3′ = 0.4 m3/kg, and x3′ = 0.995
Thus, c2 = 2( h1 − h2 )
h, kJ/kg
20 bar
1
3025 300°C 10.91 bar
2880 2
Dry 4.5 bar
satu
rate
d
2700
3 3′ x3′ = 0.995
s
Example 6.3
Dry saturated steam at 3 bar is expanded through a convergent nozzle to 1.5 bar. The exit area
is 2.5 cm2. Calculate the exit velocity and mass flow rate, assuming (a) isentropic expansion,
(b) supersaturated flow, and (c) degree of under-cooling at exit.
Solution
(a) At p1 = 3 bar
s1 = 6.992 kJ/kg.K, h1 = 2724.3 kJ/kg, v1 = 0.6058 m3/kg
At p2 = 1.5 bar
s1 = s2 = sf 2 + x2 sfg2
6.9918 = 1.4335 + x2 × 5.7897
x2 = 0.96
h2 = hf2 + x2hfg2 = 467.08 + 0.96 × 2226.5 = 2604.52 kJ/kg
v2 = vf2 + x2 (vg2 − vf2) = 0.001053 + 0.96 × (1.159 − 0.001053) = 1.113 m3/kg
A 2 c2 2.5 × 10 −4 × 491.49
ṁ = = = 0.11 kg/s
v2 1.113
(b) For supersaturated flow, pv1.3 = const.
1
n −1 2
2n p2 n
c2 = p1v1 1 −
n − 1 p1
1
0.3 2
2 × 1.3 1 .5 1.3
c2 = × 3 × 105 × 0.6058 1 − = 482.52 m/s
0.3 3
1 1
p n 3 1.3
v2 = v1 1 = 0.6058 = 1.0325 m3/kg
p2 1.5
2.5 × 10 −4 × 482.52
ṁ = = 0.117 kg/s
1.0325
n −1
p n
(c) T2 = T1 1
p2
T1 = 273 + 133.55 = 406.55 K
0.3
1.5 1.3
T2 = 406.55 = 346.45 K or 73.45°C
3
Saturation temperature at 1.5 bar = 111.37°C
Degree of under cooling at exit = 111.37 − 73.45 = 37.92°C.
Example 6.4
Steam at a pressure of 10 bar, 0.96 dry is expanded through a convergent–divergent nozzle and
leaves the nozzle at 0.3 bar.
(a) Calculate the velocity of steam at throat for maximum discharge. Take n = 1.134.
(b) Calculate the exit area and steam discharge if the throat area is 1.5 cm2. Assume isentropic
flow and ignore friction losses.
Solution
The nozzle is shown in Fig. 6.8.
(a) v1 = vf1 + x1 (vg1– vf1) = 0.001127 + 0.96 × (0.19444 − 0.001127) = 0.1867 m3/kg
n 1.135
2 n −1 2 0.135
For maximum discharge, p2 = p1 = 10 = 5.774 bar
n + 1
2.135
2n
Velocity of steam at throat, c2 = pv
n + 1 1 1
1
2 × 1.135 5 2
c2 = × 10 × 10 × 0.1867
2.135
= 445.54 m/s
1 2 3
p1 p2 p3
c1 c2 c3
v1 v2 v3
A1 A2 A3
At p2 = 5.774 bar
(0.001101 − 0.001097)
vf = 0.001097 + × (5.774 − 5.5) = 0.001099 m3/kg
0.5
670.54 − 655.9
hf = 655.9 +
(5.774 − 5.5) = 663.92 kJ/kg
0.5
2086.3 − 2097.0
hfg = 2097.0 + (5.774 − 5.5) = 2091.14 kJ/kg
0.5
1.9311 − 1.8972
sf = 1.8972 + (5.774 − 5.5) = 1.9157 kJ/kg.K
0.5
4.8289 − 4.8920
sfg = 4.8920 + (5.774 − 5.5) = 4.857 kJ/kg.K
0.5
6.4085 = 1.9157 + x2 × 4.857
x2 = 0.925
h2 = hf2 + x2hfg2 = 663.92 + 0.925 × 2091.14 = 2598.22 kJ/kg
h1 = hf1 + x1hfg1 = 762.79 + 0.96 × 2015.3 = 2697.5 kJ/kg
A 2 c2 1.5 × 10 −4 × 445.54
(ṁ)max = = = 0.22 kg/s
v2 0.3034
At p3 = 0.8 bar, sf3 = 1.233 kJ/kg.K, sfg3 = 6.202 kJ/kg.K
s2 = s3
sf2 + x2 sfg2 = sf3 + x3 sfg3
1.9157 + 0.925 × 4.857 = 1.233 + x3 × 6.202
x3 = 0.833
h3 = hf3 + x3hfg3 = 391.7 + 0.833 × 2274.1 = 2286 kJ/kg
Example 6.5
A convergent–divergent nozzle is supplied with steam at 10 bar and 250°C. The divergent portion of
the nozzle is 4 cm long and throat diameter is 6 mm. Find the semi-cone angle of the divergent sec-
tion so that steam may leave the nozzle at 1.2 bar. The frictional loss in the nozzle is 10 percent of the
total enthalpy drop. Assume that the frictional loss occurs only in the divergent part of the nozzle.
Solution
Assuming maximum discharge, the throat pressure,
n
2 n −1
p2 = p1
n + 1
For superheated steam, n = 1.3
1.3
2 0.3
p2 = 10 = 5.457 bar
2.3
The nozzle and the h − s (Mollier) diagram is shown in Fig. 6.9. Locate point ‘1’ on the Mollier dia-
gram corresponding to p1 = 10 bar and 250°C. Draw a vertical line from point ‘1’ to cut the p2 line at
point ‘2’ and p3 line at point 3.
Length (1 − 4) = 0.9 × Length (1 − 3)
Draw horizontal line 4 − 3′ to cut p3 line at point 3′. Point 3′ gives the exit condition of steam.
From the Mollier diagram, we have
p1 = 10 bar: h1 = 2940 kJ/kg
p2 = 5.457 bar: h2 = 2830 kJ/kg, v2 = 0.4 m3/kg
p3 = 1.2 bar: h3 = 2530 kJ/kg, x3′ = 0.955, vs3′ = 1.5 m3/kg
h1 − h3 = 2940−2530 = 410 kJ/kg
h4 − h3 = 0.1 × 410 = 41 kJ/kg
c2 = 2 ( h1 − h2 ) = 2 ( 2940 − 2830) × 103 = 469 m/s
A 2 c2 p (6 × 10 −3 )2 × 469
ṁ = = × = 0.03315 kg/s
u2 4 0.4
1 2 3
2940 1
5.457 bar
250°C
2 1.2 bar
2830
4
h4
h3 3′
3
x3′ = 0.995
3′ 0.03315 × 1.4325
mv
A3 = = = 5.447 × 10–5 m2
c3 871.76
p 2
d = 5.447 × 10–5
4 3
d3 = 8.33 × 10–3 m or 8.33 mm
D − d 8.33 − 6 2.33
tan q = = = = 0.02991
2L 2 × 40 80
q = 1.67°
2q = 3.34°
Example 6.6
Dry saturated steam at pressure of 5 bar flows through a convergent–divergent nozzle at the rate of
4 kg/s and discharges at a pressure of 1.5 bar. The loss due to friction occurs only in the diverging
portion of the nozzle and its magnitude is 15% of the total isentropic enthalpy drop. Assume the
isentropic index of expansion n = 1.135. Determine the area of cross-section at the throat and exit
of the nozzle.
Solution
Refer to Fig. 6.10.
For maximum discharge,
n
p2 2 n −1
=
p1 n + 1
1.135
2 0.135
p2 = 5 = 2.887 bar
1.135 + 1
From steam table, we get
h1 = 2748.7 kJ/kg, s1 = 6.8212 kJ/kg.K
Now, s1 = s3 = sf3 + x3sfg3
6.8212 = 1.4335 + x3 × 5.7997
x3 = 0.93
h3 = hf 3 + x3hfg3 = 467.08 + 0.93 × 2226.5 = 2537.7 kJ/kg
(h1 − h3)isen = 2748.7 − 2537.7 = 211 kJ/kg
h1 − h3′ = h1 − h4 = 0.85 × 211 = 179.35 kJ/kg
From Mollier diagram (Fig. 6.10), x2 = 0.965, x3′ = 0.945, h2 = 2662 kJ/kg
vs2 = 0.7 m3/kg, vs3′ = 1.1 m3/kg, h3′ = 2585 kJ/kg
v2 = x2vs2 = 0.965 × 0.7 = 0.676 m3/kg
v3′ = x3′vs3′ = 0.945 × 1.1 = 1.04 m3/kg
h (kJ/kg) 5 bar
2.887 bar
1
h1 1.5 bar
h2 2
h3′
h3 3′
4 3
x=1
x2
x3′
s
dp
dh = = − cdc
r
1
dc = − dp
rc
Substituting this in Eq. (6.13), we have
dA d r dc d r dp 1
= − − =− + dp
A r c r dp rc 2
d r d r 1 dp 1 1
= − − = − +
r dp c 2 r dp c 2
Since the flow is isentropic,
dr
dp c2
= = cs2
d r M2
and therefore,
dA dp
= (1 − M 2 )(6.14a)
A rc 2
p
p + dp
c T c + dc
T + dT
s s + ds
Control surface
(g RT)dp cs2 dp
= (1 − M 2 ) = ⋅ (1 − M 2 )
2 g p
g pc 2 c
dA 1 dp 1 − M 2
or = (6.14b)
A g p M2
(a)
(b)
Figure 6.12 Required area changes for (a) nozzles and (b) diffusers
For an ideal gas with constant specific heat, Eq. (6.15) can be written as:
g RT T0
c2 = 2 cp0 (T0 − T) = 2 − 1
g − 1 T
Since cs2 = g RT, where g = cp0/cv0
2cs2 T0
c2 = − 1
g − 1 T
c2 2 T0
= M2 = − 1
cs2 g − 1 T
T0 g − 1 2
= 1+ M (6.16)
T 2
For an isentropic process,
g 1
T0 g −1 p0 T g −1 r0
T = and 0 =
p T r
g
p0 (g − 1) 2 g −1
Therefore, = 1+ M (6.17)
p 2
1
r0 (g − 1) 2 g −1
= 1+ M (6.18)
r 2
p r T
Values of , , and are given as a function of M in Table 6.1 for the value of g = 1.40.
p0 r0 T0
Table 6.1 O
ne-dimensional insentropic compressible-flow functions for an ideal gas with constant
specific heat and molecular weight and g = 1.4
The conditions at the throat of the nozzle can be found by putting M = 1 at the throat. The properties
at the throat are denoted as an asterisk (*) and are referred to as critical properties.
T* 2
Therefore, = (6.19)
T0 g + 1
g
p* 2 g −1
= (6.20)
p0 g + 1
g
p* 2 g −1
= (6.21)
r 0 g + 1
Table 6.2 gives these ratios for various values of k.
pM g g −1 2
= 1+ M (6.22)
T0 R 2
Substituting Eq. (6.17) in Eq. (6.22), the flow per unit area can be expressed in terms of stagnation
pressure, stagnation temperature, Mach number, and gas properties.
m p g M
= 0 × (6.23)
A T0 R (g +1)
g −1
2 (g −1)
2
1 + 2 M
m
At the throat, M = 1, and therefore, the flow per unit area at the throat, , can be found by setting
M = 1 in Eq. (6.23). A*
m p0 g 1
= × (6.24)
(g +1)
A* T0 R
g + 1 2(g −1)
2
A
The area ratio can be obtained by dividing Eq. (6.24) by Eq. (6.23).
A*
A/A*
4
3
g = 1.4
2
1
Figure 6.13 Area ratio as a function of Mach number for isentropic nozzle
(g +1)
1 2 g − 1 2 2(g −1)
A
= 1 + 2 M (6.25)
A∗ M g + 1
The values of A/A* as a function of M are given in Table 6.1. Fig. 6.13 depicts the variation of A/A*
with M, which shows that a subsonic nozzle is converging and a supersonic nozzle is diverging.
p0
pE pB
T0
p
a
p0
b
c
d
Figure 6.14 Pressure ratio as a function of back pressure for a convergent nozzle
pE
p0
d c
m 1.0
b a
b
d c
a pB pB
1.0 p0 1.0 p0
c=0
p0 pE pB
T0
Throat
a
b
p c
p0 d
e
Example 6.7
A convergent nozzle has an exit area of 500 mm2. Air enters the nozzle with a stagnation pressure
of 1000 kPa and a stagnation temperature of 360 K. Determine the mass rate of flow for back pres-
sures of 800 kPa, 528 kPa, and 300 kPa, assuming isentropic flow. For air, k = 1.4.
Solution
g
p∗ 2 g −1 2
3.5
Critical pressure ratio, = = = 0.528
p0 g + 1 2.4
Control surface
Normal shock
cx cy
Continuity equation:
m
= r x cx = r y c y (6.27)
A
Momentum equation:
A(px − py) = ṁ (cy − cx)(6.28)
Second law:
sy − sx ≥ 0 (6.29)
The energy and continuity equations can be combined to establish an equation that when plotted on
the h − s diagram is called the Fanno line. Similarly, the momentum and continuity equations can be
combined to establish an equation the plot of which on the h − s diagram is known as the Rayleigh line.
Both these lines are shown on the h − s diagram in Fig. 6.18. The point of maximum entropy on each
line, points ‘a’ and ‘b’, corresponds to M = 1. The lower part of each line corresponds to supersonic
flow, whereas the upper part corresponds to subsonic flow.
The two points where all three equations are satisfied are points x and y, where x being in the super-
sonic region and y in the subsonic region. Since sy − sx ≥ 0, the normal shock can proceed only from
x to y. This means that the velocity changes from supersonic (M > 1) before the shock to subsonic
(M < 1) after the shock.
Assuming constant specific heats, the energy Eq. (6.26) gives,
Tox = Toy(6.30)
That is, there is no change in stagnation temperature across a normal shock. Using Eq. (6.16), we have
Tox g −1 2
= 1+ Mx
Tx 2
Toy g −1 2
= 1+ My
Ty 2
y
po
p
x Fanno line
hx
s
Figure 6.18 End states for a one-dimensional normal shock on an enthalpy–entropy diagram
Ty py cy p y M y csy p y M y Ty
= = =
Tx px c x px M x csx px M x Tx
2 2
Ty p y M y
or = (6.32)
Tx px M x
Combining energy Eq. (6.31) and continuity Eq. (6.32) gives the equation of the Fanno line.
g −1 2
py Mx 1+ Mx
= 2 (6.33)
px g −1 2
My 1+ My
2
The momentum and continuity equations can be combined as follows to give the equation of the
Rayleigh line.
m
px – py = (c – c ) = r y c 2y − r x cx2
A y x
px + rx cx2 = py + ry c 2y
px + rx M 2 c 2 = p + r M 2 c 2
x sx y y y sy
px M 2x p y M 2y
px + (g RTx ) = p y + = (g RTy )
RTx RTy
px (1 + g M 2x ) = p y (1 + g M 2 )
py 1 + g M2
= (6.34)
px 1 + g M 2y
Combining Eqs (6.33) and (6.34), we get
2
M 2x +
g −1
M 2y = (6.35)
2g
M 2x − 1
g −1
Table 6.3 gives the normal shock functions, which includes My as a function of Mx for g = 1.4.
Table 6.3 O
ne-dimensional normal shock functions for an ideal gas with constant specific heat
and molecular weight and g = 1.4
Example 6.9
For the convergent–divergent nozzle of Example 6.8 in which the diverging section acts as a super-
sonic nozzle (Fig. 6.19), a normal shock stands in the exit plane of the nozzle. Determine the static
pressure and temperature and the stagnation pressure (a) just downstream of the normal shock and
(b) at a point where M = 1.4.
Solution
(a) From Table 6.3, we have
py Ty po y
Mx = 2.197, My = 0.547, = 4.46, =1.854, = 0.630
px Tx pox
Normal shock
pOX = 1000 kPa
TOX = 360 K
Mx = 2.197
pox = 1000 kPa
px = 93.9 kPa
Tx = 183.2 K
Example 6.10
Steam at stagnation pressure of 800 kPa and a stagnation temperature of 350°C expands in a nozzle
to 200 kPa. When the mass flow rate is 3 kg/s, determine the throat area and exit area for isentropic
flow.
Solution
p*
Critical pressure ratio at the throat, = 0.545
p0
p* = 0.545 × 800 = 436 kPa
s* = s0 = 7.4089 kJ/kg. K
h0 = 3161.7 kJ/kg
T * = 268.7°C
h* = 3001.4 kJ/kg
c *2
h0 = h* +
2
c* = 2( h0 − h*) = 2(3161.7 − 3001.4) × 103 = 566.2 m/s
v*= 0.5724 m3/kg
* 3 × 0.5724
mv
A* = = = 3.033 × 10–3 m2 or 30.33 cm2
c* 566.2
At the nozzle exit,
pE = 200 kPa, sE = s0 = 7.4089 kJ/kg.K
TE = 178.5°C
hE = 2826.7 kJ/kg
vE = 1.0284 m3/kg
E 3 × 1.0284
mv
AE = = = 3.769 × 10–3 m3 or 37.69 cm2
cE 818.5
Example 6.11
5 kg/s of steam at 30 bar and 350°C is supplied to a group of 6 nozzles in a wheel diameter main-
tained at 4 bar. Calculate the following:
(a) The dimensions of the nozzles of rectangular cross-sectional flow area with aspect ratio of
2.5:1. The expansion may be considered metastable and friction is neglected.
(b) Degree of undercooling and supersaturation
(c) Loss in available heat drop due to irreversibility
(d) Increase in entropy
(e) Ratio of mass flow rate with metastable expansion to that if expansion is in thermal equilibrium.
Solution
The h-s diagram is shown in Fig. 6.20.
h1 = 3115.3 kJ/kg
v1 = 0.09053 m3/kg
s1 = 6.74257 kJ/kg.K
s3 = s1 = sf3 + x3sfg3
6.7427 = 1.7766 + x3 × 5.1193
x3 = 0.97
h3 = hf3 + x3hfg3
= 604.73 + 0.97 × 2133.8
= 2674.5 kJ/kg
v3 = vf3 + x3(vg3– vf3) = 0.0010840.97 × (0.4625 – 0.001084)
= 0.45 m3/kg
h (kJ/kg)
3115.3 30 bar
350° C
4 bar
2 2′
2674.5
3
1 1
30 1.3
v2 = v1 p1 n = 0.09053 = 0.4263 m3/kg
p 4
2
A 2 c2
ṁ =
v2
5 × 0.4263
A2 = = 2.279 × 10−3 m2 or 22.79 cm2
935.4
Let breadth = b
Then length, l = 2.5 b
Area of 6 nozzles = 6 × 2.5b × b = 15b2
15b2 = 2.279 × 10–3
b = 0.0123 m or 12.3 mm
l = 0.0308 m or 30.8 mm
n −1 0.3
p n 4 1.3
(b) T2 = T1 2 = (273 + 350) = 391.34 K or 118.34°C
1
p 30
At 4 bar, ts = 143.65°C
Degree of undercooling = 143.65 − 118.34 = 24.31°C
Example 6.12
Dry saturated steam at 5 bar with negligible velocity expands isentropically in a convergent nozzle
to 1 bar and dryness fraction 0.94. Determine the velocity of steam leaving the nozzle.
Solution
Given that p1 = 5 bar; p2 = 1 bar; x2 = 0.94
For p1 = 5 bar, enthalpy of dry saturated steam from steam tables,
h1 = hg1 = 2748.7 kJ/kg
and for p2 = 1 bar, we find that,
hf 2 = 417.44 kJ/kg, hfg2 = 2258.0 kJ/kg
∴ h2 = hf2 + x2 hfg2
= 417.44 + 0.94 × 2258.0 = 2539.96 kJ/kg
Enthalpy drop, ∆h = h1 − h2
= 2748.75 − 2539.96 = 208.74 kJ/kg
Velocity of steam leaving the nozzle
c2 = 44.72 ∆h = 44.72 208.74 = 646.1 m/s
Example 6.13
Dry saturated steam at a pressure of 15 bar enters in a nozzle and is discharged at a pressure of 1.5
bar. Find the final velocity of steam when initial velocity of steam is negligible. If 15% of the heat
drop is lost in friction, then find the percentage reduction in the final velocity.
Condensation shock waves develop when steam in nozzles transitions abruptly from a metastable state to a saturated state, causing rapid condensation. This sudden phase change leads to a sharp increase in entropy and a decrease in velocity, disrupting steady flow patterns and potentially causing pressure fluctuations and loss of nozzle efficiency. Such events typically occur when the back pressure is adjusted such that the flow cannot maintain its supersonic condition through the entire nozzle without compensatory pressure drops outside the nozzle .
Supersaturated or metastable flow occurs when steam expands beyond the saturation point without condensation due to insufficient time for the phase change, usually caused by high velocity. As a result, the steam remains dry and continues expanding past the saturation point in the nozzle, maintaining a higher pressure and temperature than expected. This can lead to a more efficient energy conversion, as represented by the non-appearance of condensation at expected phase change points on the Mollier diagram .
The isentropic index of expansion, denoted as 'n', is used in calculating the enthalpy drop and affects the flow properties in nozzles by determining the relationship between pressure, volume, and temperature change during expansion. The index alters the calculation of the enthalpy drop, which influences both the velocity and cross-sectional area required at the throat and exit for desired flow rates, as specific enthalpy and volume changes are directly correlated to the value of 'n' used in thermodynamic calculations .
Designing nozzle exit areas should account for friction effects, which lower the actual enthalpy drop compared to theoretical predictions. This leads to lower exit velocities and changes specific volume and dryness fraction of the steam. Therefore, the design should include allowances for decreased energy conversion efficiency and potential increases in final steam volume, requiring adjustments in exit area sizing to maintain desired flow characteristics .
Considering the condition of maximum discharge is crucial in convergent–divergent nozzles to ensure efficient operation under various pressure conditions. Achieving maximum discharge ensures that the nozzle operates at optimal mass flow, even under varying back pressures below critical levels, thereby maximizing efficiency and performance. This condition is reached when the throat Mach number is at unity and is essential for designing nozzles that accommodate large variations in operational settings, ensuring the diverging section transitions effectively to supersonic flow .
The critical pressure ratio determines whether the flow in a convergent nozzle is subsonic or choked. When the back pressure is above the critical pressure ratio, flow remains subsonic. As back pressure decreases to the critical point, the flow can reach Mach 1 at the throat, defining choked conditions where the mass flow rate reaches maximum possible and remains constant even if back pressure decreases further. This ratio is crucial for controlling nozzle performance and maximizing mass flow .
In metastable nozzle flow, the degree of supersaturation can increase mass flow rate by delaying the on-set of condensation, maintaining lower density and allowing higher velocity through the nozzle. This phenomenon results in a more sustained mass flow rate, even at lower back pressure settings, compared to equilibrium conditions. The metastable state allows optimization of energy transfer by preserving higher energy states without premature phase changes .
The presence of friction in a convergent–divergent nozzle affects the expansion of steam by reducing the actual enthalpy drop compared to the isentropic enthalpy drop. On a Mollier diagram, this is represented by a deviation from the isentropic line, resulting in steam reaching a higher dryness fraction at the exit and an increase in specific volume. Friction mainly occurs in the divergent part of the nozzle, depicted by the expansion path AED, compared to the isentropic path AEB .
The design of a convergent–divergent nozzle must adapt to varying flow conditions, particularly between isentropic and superheated states. Under isentropic conditions, the nozzle aims for minimal energy loss with an optimal Mach number achieved at the throat. When handling superheated flow, additional considerations include managing higher thermal loads and ensuring the material and structural design can withstand increased thermal stresses. Adjustments in nozzle geometry might be required to handle larger phase change regions effectively .
Nozzle efficiency impacts steam velocity by determining the actual versus theoretical enthalpy drop during expansion. A lower nozzle efficiency reduces the actual enthalpy drop, thereby decreasing the exit velocity of steam. The exit velocity accounting for friction is calculated using the equation c2 = 44.72 hn Δh_isen where hn represents nozzle efficiency, impacting the final velocity due to its influence on the enthalpy difference .