Stat 102 Problem Set 2 Instructions and Questions
Stat 102 Problem Set 2 Instructions and Questions
To construct a 95% confidence interval for the true mean amount spent by students on alcoholic beverages, use the formula: CI = x̄ ± z * (σ/√n), where x̄ is the sample mean, z is the z-score corresponding to a 95% confidence level (approximately 1.96), σ is the standard deviation, and n is the sample size. With the provided data: the sample mean is 315.5 pesos, the standard deviation is given as 10 pesos, and the sample size is 10. Plugging in these values results in: 315.5 ± 1.96 * (10/√10), which calculates to approximately 315.5 ± 6.2. Thus, the confidence interval is (309.3, 321.7). This means we are 95% confident that the true mean monthly expenditure on alcoholic beverages by PU students lies between 309.3 and 321.7 pesos .
The slope of the regression equation, given as 3.47812, indicates the average increase in printing time (in seconds) for each additional kilobyte of file size. It reflects the strength and direction of the linear relationship between the size of the file and the time it takes to print. Specifically, for every 1 kilobyte increase in file size, the printing time increases by approximately 3.48 seconds, assuming other factors remain constant .
To conclude whether there is a significant difference in mean weight gain among three diets using ANOVA at a 1% significance level, set up an ANOVA table to calculate the F-ratio. The null hypothesis (H0) assumes that all group means are equal, while the alternative hypothesis (H1) assumes that at least one mean is different. Calculate the between-group variance and within-group variance from the data, then find the F-ratio: F = variance between groups / variance within groups. Compare the calculated F-ratio to the critical F-value from F-distribution tables with appropriate degrees of freedom. If the calculated F-ratio is greater than the critical value, H0 is rejected, thus indicating significant differences in the mean weight gain among the diets .
The labor union can perform a one-sample t-test to evaluate the supermarket chain's claim that they pay more than the minimum daily wage of 500 pesos. The null hypothesis (H0) is that the average wage is 500 pesos, and the alternative hypothesis (H1) is that the average wage is greater than 500 pesos. Given the sample mean of 510 pesos, standard deviation of 100 pesos, and sample size of 144, the test statistic can be calculated using the formula: t = (x̄ - μ) / (s/√n), resulting in a t-value. With a significance level of 0.05, compare the calculated t-value to the critical t-value from the t-distribution table. If the calculated t-value exceeds the critical value, the null hypothesis is rejected, supporting the claim that wages are higher than 500 pesos .
A researcher can use a one-proportion z-test to determine if the percentage of births by Cesarean Section has decreased from 20%. The null hypothesis (H0) states that the true proportion is 0.20, and the alternative hypothesis (H1) states that the proportion is less than 0.20. With a sample size of 144 births and 25 Cesarean births, the sample proportion is 25/144 ≈ 0.1736. The test statistic is calculated using the formula: z = (p̂ - p0) / √(p0(1-p0)/n), where p̂ is the sample proportion, p0 is the hypothesized proportion, and n is the sample size. Calculating this gives a z-value. Compare this against the critical value for a 0.05 significance level. If the z-value is less than the critical value, the null hypothesis is rejected, indicating that the percentage has indeed decreased .