Aage Stangeland at.
el highlighted the urgent need to address global warming
caused by human-generated CO2 emissions, and suggests that widespread Carbon
Capture and Storage (CCS) implementation could lead to a 54% reduction in CO2
emissions in the EU and a 33% reduction globally by 2050.[2007]
Praveen Bains [Link] emphasizes the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions,
particularly CO2, to prevent severe global warming. Carbon capture and storage
(CCS) is seen as a crucial method for emission control, bridging the gap between
current fossil fuel energy and future renewables. Calculations determined that
CCS could be the sole option for industries lacking low-carbon alternatives. The
text proposes an implementation pathway, starting with ethanol production, then
cement, ammonia, and subsequently, natural gas processing and ethylene oxide
production. [2017]
Guillermo Galánthe [Link] stated the need to address rising CO2 levels in the
atmosphere through lifestyle decarbonization and CO2 removal to achieve
sustainable development goals. It compares various CO2 capture technologies
from the air, including biomass and direct air capture (DAC). To manufacture
methanol, four biomass gasification processes are examined. Following two direct air
capture technologies, CO2 hydrogenation is used. Water is divided using solar and/or
wind energy to create hydrogen. The state of technology at the moment favors biomass.