Cover Page

Contents
Introduction.................................................................................................................................................3
Contextualizing the Shanghai Tower Project...........................................................................................3
1.1 Political Context.................................................................................................................................3
1.2 Environmental Context......................................................................................................................4
1.3 Social Context....................................................................................................................................4
1.4 Technological Context.......................................................................................................................4
1.5 Economic Context..............................................................................................................................5
1.5 Legal Context.....................................................................................................................................5
2. Analysis of Project Management Aspects................................................................................................5
2.1 Scope Management:..........................................................................................................................5
2.2 Time Management:...........................................................................................................................6
2.3 Cost Management:............................................................................................................................6
2.4 Quality Management:........................................................................................................................6
2.5 Human Resource Management:........................................................................................................6
2.6 Risk Management:.............................................................................................................................7
3. Critical Evaluation in the Context of Contemporary Research and Experience:......................................7
4. Observations, Lessons Learned................................................................................................................8
Collaborative Stakeholder Engagement:.................................................................................................8
b) Technology-driven Innovation:............................................................................................................8
c) Adaptive Risk Management:................................................................................................................9
d) Sustainability Integration:...................................................................................................................9
e) Importance of Leadership and Governance:.......................................................................................9
f) Cultural Sensitivity:.............................................................................................................................10
Conclusion.................................................................................................................................................10
Introduction...............................................................................................................................................11
Complexity and Uncertainty......................................................................................................................11
Stakeholder Management.....................................................................................................................11
Resource Constraints.............................................................................................................................12
Communication and Collaboration........................................................................................................12
Risk Management......................................................................................................................................13
Change Management............................................................................................................................13
Conclusion.................................................................................................................................................13
References.................................................................................................................................................15
 Shanghai Tower, China: A Landmark in Program and Project
Management

Introduction
The Shanghai Tower represents China's modernization and rising prosperity. It was a
massive project that needed careful preparation, organization, and execution because of its
status as one of the world's highest buildingsThe goal of this study is to take a broader look at
the Shanghai Tower project, analysing its management, assessing its pros and cons, and
drawing lessons for future endeavours of a similar [Link] the complexities of large-
scale programmes and project management requires looking at the project from every possible
angle, including the political, environmental, social, technical, economic, and legal.

Contextualizing the Shanghai Tower Project

The planning and implementation of the Shanghai Tower project were influenced by
several factors. The Chinese government politically desired to display its technological strength
and develop Shanghai as a worldwide financial centre. It was designed to help the environment
by providing a solution to the problems caused by urban congestion. The social goal was to
make the city more habitable and eco-friendlier. It used state-of-the-art engineering and design
practices. The project's economic goals included luring investors, stimulating development, and
making new jobs available. The project has to follow the law and meet both national and
international benchmarks. These factors greatly influenced the project's foundation and
implementation (Al Kodmany, 2015).

1.1 Political Context

Politically, the Chinese government wanted to showcase the country's technical progress
and establish Shanghai as a worldwide financial hub. China's dedication to urban and economic
expansion was on display in the Shanghai Tower, a symbol of the country's ambition and
success (Xue and Ding, 2018; Urban, 2013). China's larger urbanization initiatives, which aimed
to increase the country's global competitiveness and entice foreign investors, were consistent
with the goals of this project. The Beijing National Stadium, often known as the "Bird's Nest," is
a good example of a politically driven construction project. China's economic and technical
might were intended to be on display during the 2008 Beijing Olympics, for which this stadium
was built. It was a symbol of China's rise to contemporary superpower status, and its majestic
design became instantly recognizable (Ong, 2011).

1.2 Environmental Context

The Shanghai Tower project is intended to maximize land use and advance sustainable
development as a means of coping with the environmental concerns of urbanization. It provided
a solution to urban overpopulation by making vertical rather than horizontal space more
efficient. Energy-efficient technologies, environmentally friendly materials, and water-saving
features were just some of the ways the project reduced its impact on the environment via smart
environmental design (Al-Kodmany, 2022). An excellent example of eco-friendly city planning is
the One Central Park development in Sydney, Australia. It improves the city's air quality and
biodiversity by combining residential and commercial areas with huge vertical gardens. The
environmentally conscious planning and cutting-edge architecture of this project are prime
examples of how green principles may be incorporated into city planning (Benton and Short,
2013).

1.3 Social Context

The social aspect of the Shanghai Tower project was intended to raise the standard of
living by creating a more accepting and inclusive neighbourhood. The tower has facilities
including stores, public gardens, and cultural centres to better the lives of its inhabitants and get
them involved in their [Link] a symbol of the city's hopes and dreams also
served to strengthen the community's feeling of unity and pride in its accomplishments (Urban,
2013). New York City's High Line is a good case in point since it was created by repurposing an
old elevated railway. Recreational options were one aspect of the regeneration project's
success in bringing the surrounding communities back to life and improving the quality of life for
residents.

1.4 Technological Context

The Shanghai Tower owed a great deal to technological progress in both its planning
and execution. To address the technical obstacles of creating a supertall structure, the project
integrated state-of-the-art engineering and architectural practices. The tower's design goals
were realized with the use of cutting-edge computer modelling, structural engineering
breakthroughs, and eco-friendly building materials (Moon, 2015; Day, 2014). Dubai, United Arab
Emirates Burj Khalifa is a showcase for modern high-rise building techniques. To create the
world's tallest structure, the project team relied on cutting-edge engineering methods including
wind tunnel testing, modern construction methods, and novel structural systems. The Burj
Khalifa is a testament to how far technological advancements can take the built environment
(Chen and Li, 2022).

1.5 Economic Context

The economic goals of the Shanghai Tower project were the promotion of economic
development, the generation of new jobs, and the attraction of both local and foreign
investment. Numerous jobs were created during construction, and the finished tower is now a
hub for commercial activity that has brought in major firms and helped the local economy.
Foreign direct investment was drawn to Shanghai because of the tower's prominence, and the
city's economy benefited from the increased activity (Xia et al., 2010Canary Wharf in London is
an example of a large-scale urban project that has had a discernible impact on the
[Link] transformation of the waterfront into a bustling commercial hub has boosted the
local economy, provided new jobs, and attracted international firms. As a result of this effort, the
neighbourhood is now a thriving financial hub.

1.5 Legal Context

The construction of the Shanghai Tower was subject to several sets of rules and
regulations, both domestic and international. The project's design and execution stages required
careful attention to relevant building rules, safety standards, environmental restrictions, and
zoning laws. The project's quality, safety, and environmental sustainability were all secured by
the team's observance of all applicable laws and regulations. The Singapore Marina Bay Sands
project shows how important it is for major construction projects to follow the law. Building rules,
environmental restrictions, and licensing processes all had to be followed carefully to guarantee
the project was legal and ethical. Compliance with regulations was crucial to the project's
financial health, public security, and ultimate success (Bui et al., 2016)

After placing the Shanghai Tower project in its larger political, environmental, social,
technical, economic, and legal context, the many factors that went into its conception and
execution become clear. We can see the effects of such projects in the world in the Beijing
National Stadium, One Central Park, the High Line, the Burj Khalifa, the Canary Wharf, and the
Marina Bay Sands. Large-scale initiatives that aid in urban renewal, economic expansion, and
environmental sustainability can only be managed and delivered with an understanding of and
commitment to these factors.
2. Analysis of Project Management Aspects
2.1 Scope Management:
As a mixed-use skyscraper, the Shanghai Tower project had complicated needs that
necessitated a precise articulation of its boundaries. This required coordinating with relevant
parties, striking a good balance between practicality and architectural ambition, and fitting in
with the existing city. As part of defining and managing the project's scope, the requirements of
the project's stakeholders and the architect's vision for the Shanghai Tower were
[Link] Sydney Opera House construction project is a real-world illustration of the value
of scope control. The project's scope expanded over time, putting pressure on the team and the
budget. To guarantee timely delivery, the management team had to carefully control the
project's scope and provide high priority to the most important elements (Xia et al., 2010).

2.2 Time Management:

Accomplishing the job on time required careful planning and organization of tasks.
Modular construction and Building Information Modeling (BIM) are two innovative techniques
that might help construction teams better manage time restrictions. Time management was
crucial to the on-time completion of the Shanghai Tower [Link] management is crucial in
the construction sector, and the London Cross rail project is a prime illustration of this. To
prevent delays and make sure the project was completed on time, the team used sophisticated
scheduling tools including critical route analysis and time buffers (Gong, 2017; Parker and
Wood, 2013).

2.3 Cost Management:

Successful completion of the project hinged on how well the budget was managed. The
project team secured the effective deployment of resources and adherence to budgetary limits
via meticulous cost assessment, value engineering, and procurement techniques. The Shanghai
Tower project could not have been completed economically without careful control of costs.
Lessons in efficient budgeting may be learned from the Panama Canal expansion project. To
keep the project under budget, the team had to do a lot of cost forecasting, value engineering,
and contract management (Dmitriev et al., 2019).

2.4 Quality Management:

The tower's lofty concept called for stringent building regulations. Regular inspections
and testing, along with other stringent quality assurance and control procedures, were put in
place to guarantee adherence to all applicable standards and regulations. For the Shanghai
Tower project, quality control was a top priority. The quality management practices used on the
Taipei 101 project in Taiwan are instructive. The project used a thorough quality control system,
which included inspections, testing of materials, and adherence to international standards,
resulting in a tower that is both structurally solid and aesthetically outstanding (Bryde et al.,
2013).

2.5 Human Resource Management:

A large-scale undertaking like this one calls for a talented and varied crew. A strong
team was assembled via careful consideration of recruiting, training, and motivating techniques.
The construction of the Shanghai Tower relied heavily on well-managed human resources. In
terms of human resource management, the Dubai Burj Khalifa project is unparalleled. The
project management team's efforts to hire and keep talented people on the team, foster an
environment conducive to collaboration, and provide many opportunities for career progression
undoubtedly contributed to the project's ultimate success.

2.6 Risk Management:

Technical difficulties, regulatory compliance issues, inclement weather, and financial
concerns were all threats to the project. Risks were reduced by rigorous measures of detection,
evaluation, and countermeasure development and implementation. There were several potential
threats to the Shanghai Tower project. Lessons in prudent risk management may be learned
from the Big Dig construction project of the Boston Central Artery and Tunnel. Risk
identification, assessment, mitigation, and contingency planning were all part of the project's
complete risk management framework, which ultimately led to the successful completion of the
difficult and complicated infrastructure project (Hu et al., 2021).

3. Critical Evaluation in the Context of Contemporary Research and

Experience:
Evaluating the Shanghai Tower project requires looking at it through the prism of current
programme and project management studies, as well as drawing on one's own experiences, to
present a whole picture. This paves the way for an in-depth analysis of the project management
methods used so far and the formulation of actionable next steps. Recent studies in the field of
programme and project management provide helpful information on what has worked, what
hasn't, and why. One field of study that is important is agile project management, which
emphasizes teamwork, fluidity, and change. By adopting agile practices, massive projects like
the Shanghai Tower might become more adaptable to shifting needs, more involved with their
stakeholders, and provide better results.
 Successful use of agile project management concepts may be seen in the building of
Heathrow Terminal 5 in the United Kingdom. Scrum and Lean construction, two examples of
agile approaches, were used on this project, allowing for more effective communication and
quicker decision-making and completion times (Williams and Samset, 2010). Furthermore, one's
own project management experiences might provide light on the difficulties encountered and the
efficiency of the method used. Insights and expertise gathered from real-world experience may
be used critically to assess the project's merits and flaws.

Personal experiences may provide light on difficulties such as stakeholder coordination,

procurement procedures, and construction delays that one can encounter when overseeing the
creation of a high-rise office complex. The assessment of the management method used on the
Shanghai Tower project may be improved by learning from the lessons learned in other large-
scale projects. A project manager's firsthand account of working on the Shard in London might
provide light on the difficulties and successes of such an undertaking. The review of the
Shanghai Tower project might benefit from lessons learned on stakeholder management, risk
reduction, and clear and effective communication (Morris, 2013).

In conclusion, a thorough analysis of the Shanghai Tower project has to take into
account both theoretical and practical knowledge about programme and project management.
An in-depth examination of the project's management techniques may be undertaken by looking
at best practices, methods, and lessons gained from comparable projects, as well as reflecting
on personal experiences. This can result in helpful insights, suggestions, and lessons for future
projects.

4. Observations, Lessons Learned

The analysis and critical evaluation of the Shanghai Tower project yield several
observations and lessons learned:

Collaborative Stakeholder Engagement:

Government agencies, designers, engineers, contractors, and the local community
were just some of the players essential to the project's success. Stakeholder
participation was fruitful because of open dialogue, honesty, and a common goal.
Cooperation and involvement from all relevant parties were essential to the
completion of the Shanghai Tower project. New York City's High Line project is a
good example of the value of including many parties in a venture. Close cooperation
 between the project team, local communities, government agencies, and non-profit
groups was essential to the successful transformation of an abandoned elevated
railway into a thriving urban park. The project's success may be traced back to the
open decision-making process and constant dialogue that it fostered.

b) Technology-driven Innovation:
Modern tools like building information modelling (BIM) and modular construction
increased productivity, decreased human error, and improved teamwork. Future projects may
greatly benefit from adopting technology improvements. The Shanghai Tower project benefited
greatly from the use of cutting-edge technology, which allowed for more productivity and higher-
quality results. The tallest structure in the world, the Burj Khalifa, was built in Dubai using
cutting-edge technology such as modern building techniques and materials. The use of these
innovations allowed the project team to surmount formidable technical hurdles and reach
previously unimaginable heights.

c) Adaptive Risk Management:

The project's risk management strategy illustrated the value of being flexible and
proactive when searching for, evaluating, and eliminating potential threats. An effective risk
management plan evolves throughout the course of a project's lifetime, monitoring and reacting
to new threats as they appear. The Shanghai Tower project highlighted the value of flexible
approaches to risk management. Many factors, including technical challenges and stakeholder
disputes, may have derailed the Big Dig, as the Boston Central Artery/Tunnel project was
colloquially known. Proactive risk reduction, as well as continual risk assessments and
contingency planning, allowed the project to be completed successfully (Flyvbjerg et al., 2003).

d) Sustainability Integration:
Sustainable design concepts were used in the construction of the Shanghai Tower,
which included the use of renewable energy sources, environmentally friendly materials, and
waste minimization techniques. The significance of implementing environmental responsibility
into large-scale undertakings is shown by this incorporation of sustainability factors. Sustainable
design elements were prominently shown in the Shanghai Tower project. The sustainable
development known as "One Central Park" may be found in Sydney, Australia. Green areas,
solar panels, and water recycling systems all contributed to the eco-friendly and sustainable
architecture of the mixed-use property. This project exemplifies how large-scale construction
projects may include sustainable practices.
e) Importance of Leadership and Governance:
Strong leadership and capable management were crucial to the success of the Shanghai
Tower [Link] project management, transparent decision-making processes, and
responsive governance mechanisms all contributed to swift problem identification and
resolution. The completion of the Shanghai Tower was dependent on strong leadership and
competent management. The success of Beijing's Bird's Nest Stadium may provide lessons on
leadership. The managers' careful preparation, clear lines of communication, and prompt, well-
considered choices likely contributed to the project's success. (Flyvbjerg, 2014).

f) Cultural Sensitivity:
The project's management strategy took into account and valued the historical
importance of the region. Project acceptability and cooperation from stakeholders may be
improved via careful cultural consideration and implementation. The Shanghai Tower project
understood the value of respecting local customs. Bilbao, Spain's Guggenheim Museum is a
good case in point. The design took into account the city's historical architecture while yet
adding contemporary touches. The museum was able to become a part of the community's
culture because of this strategy.

Conclusion
In conclusion, the examination of the Shanghai Tower project demonstrates the value of
strong leadership and governance, as well as collaborative stakeholder involvement,
technology-driven innovation, risk management, sustainability integration, and cultural
sensitivity. The High Line, Burj Khalifa, Boston Central Artery/Tunnel, One Central Park, Beijing
National Stadium, and the Guggenheim Museum are just a few examples of how these ideas
have been put into practice in the real world. Program and project managers may improve
project results, stakeholder satisfaction, and overall success by applying these lessons learned
to future initiatives. Finally, the Shanghai Tower project is a perfect example of how large-scale
projects may be successfully managed. The project's conception and execution were affected
by a wide range of societal, political, economic, technical, and legal variables. A comprehensive
analysis of management issues including scope, time, cost, quality, human resources, and risk
management has yielded useful insights. Recent research and first-hand experience have
allowed for a more critical evaluation of the project's achievements and shortcomings.
 The importance of collaborative stakeholder involvement, technology-driven innovation,
adaptive risk management, sustainability integration, leadership, governance, and cultural
sensitivity are only a few of the lessons learnt from the Shanghai Tower project. These results
provide helpful guidelines for future projects by highlighting the significance of good
communication, technical improvements, and proactive risk management, including
sustainability, strong leadership, and cultural knowledge. The Shanghai Tower is not just a work
of art in its own right, but also a demonstration of the efficacy of careful programme and project
management. The lessons learnt from the Shanghai Tower project will help shape the future of
the programme and project management, paving the way for the global execution of creative,
sustainable, and revolutionary projects as the world continues to experience the growth of
ambitious construction projects.

A Critical Analysis and Evaluation of the Challenges Faced in

the Programme and Project Management of Complex
Programmes and Projects

Introduction
Complex programmes and projects cannot be carried out without the assistance of
project managers. Unfortunately, several obstacles might be encountered during
implementation, which can put the results at risk. This essay provides a critical analysis and
evaluation of the difficulties inherent in the project management of complex programmes and
projects. The purpose of this article is to provide insights into possible solutions and best
practices by evaluating these difficulties and their influence on project delivery.

Complexity and Uncertainty

Interdependencies, stakeholders, and contexts are all factors that contribute to the
complexity of a programme or project. Because of this complexity, planning, coordination, and
risk management become more difficult. The construction of airports and high-speed rail
networks are two examples of massive infrastructure projects that involve many parties,
complex scheduling, and unknown site circumstances. Adopting an adaptive management style,
such as the Agile or Lean methodology, may improve responsiveness and adaptability in the
face of complexity and unpredictability [McDonald and Eisenhardt 2019; Warner and Wager,
2019]. For instance, the intricacy and unknowns of the Crossrail project in London's construction
sector presented several difficulties. Government agencies, contractors, and the residents of the
surrounding neighbourhoods all had to work together to build a new railway line under the city.
As a means to adapt to evolving needs and reduce risk, the project team adopted adaptive
project management practises including iterative development and continuous feedback.

Stakeholder Management
Due to their frequently conflicting interests and expectations, stakeholders must be
managed effectively if complex programmes and projects are to be successful. Conflicts,
delays, and subpar project results might arise when stakeholders aren't properly identified and
engaged. Community members, state and federal agencies, green groups, and financial
backers could all have a hand in a renewable energy project's planning and implementation.
Stakeholder analysis and involvement should continue throughout a project's lifespan [Wayne,
2012; Mok et al., 2015] to foster trust, set realistic expectations, and ensure that results meet
the requirements of all involved parties.

Stakeholder management is a common source of difficulty in the IT industry when

implementing large software systems. An enterprise resource planning (ERP) rollout at a major
firm can be used as an example. The project team did an exhaustive stakeholder study to
identify the most important people and organisations that would be impacted by the new
system. A more seamless transition and more user acceptability were the results of their active
engagement of stakeholders via frequent communication, training programmes, and resolving
their concerns

Resource Constraints
Financial, human, and technical investments in complex programmes and initiatives are
not uncommon. Project managers face a formidable obstacle in the form of resource limits while
trying to achieve their goals. For instance, the creation of a novel pharmaceutical medicine
requires large sums of money, highly trained experts, and state-of-the-art laboratories. To deal
with resource shortages and boost project effectiveness, Kerzner (2017) recommends using
effective resource management approaches such as resource levelling and prioritising.

Many fields have severe resource limitations. As an example, consider the aerospace
business, where creating a new plane requires massive sums of money, extensive technical
knowledge, and few available production facilities. Project success within restrictions may be
ensured by effective resource management, such as optimising personnel allocation, using
technology for efficient production, and prioritising essential activities.

Communication and Collaboration

Complex programmes and projects might stall due to communication failures and
inefficient teamwork. With more people, groups, and organisations in the mix, it's more
important than ever that everyone be able to effectively communicate and work together. When
executing worldwide IT projects, for instance, international corporations often have difficulties in
coordinating teams across time zones and cultural settings. According to Kerzner (2017),
successful communication and collaboration may be achieved by the implementation of clear
communication protocols, the promotion of a collaborative culture, and the use of relevant tools
and technology.

Problems in coordination and communication are common in global projects. Project

developers, government agencies, environmental groups, and local people all need to work
together to build a massive offshore wind farm for the renewable energy industry.

Risk Management
Risks in the areas of technology, finance, law, and the environment are just a few of
those that might affect complex programmes and projects. If these risks aren't recognised,
evaluated, and mitigated, the project might face delays, cost overruns, or even collapse.
Dangers might arise during the building of major infrastructure due to things like bad weather,
shifting regulations, or unexpected geological obstacles. In industries like healthcare, where
sophisticated medical research initiatives encounter various uncertainties, risk management is
crucial. Clinical trial failures, regulatory difficulties, and unexpected bad effects are only some of
the risks inherent in the development of a new medicine. Effective management of possible
hazards requires a complete risk management framework that includes proactive risk
identification, risk assessment, and the execution of mitigation techniques (Hillson, 2012).

Change Management
The methods, systems, and organisational structures that support the delivery of
complex programmes and projects are typically fundamentally altered. Significant difficulties
arise from the combination of stakeholder opposition to change and the difficulty of introducing
and integrating new components. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) system rollouts at
multinationals often meet opposition from staff used to working with outdated methods. Finally,
change implementation is difficult in any sector. The automobile sector is a good example since
the transition to electric cars requires radical changes in production methods, supply networks,
and customer expectations. To enable a seamless acceptance of a change, effective change
management must incorporate early stakeholder engagement, ongoing support and training,
and clear communication of the change's advantages (Kotter, 1996).

Conclusion

In conclusion, managing complex programmes and projects effectively entails

addressing challenges such as complexity and ambiguity, managing stakeholders and their
expectations, dealing with limited resources, fostering communication and teamwork, evaluating
risks, and encouraging positive change. These problems are inevitable in large projects and
may have a major impact on the results. Proactive strategies and methods are essential for
successful project managers to overcome these obstacles. In order to thrive in the face of
complexity and unpredictability, they must use adaptive management practices. Project
managers are better able to handle the complexities of complicated projects if they regularly
examine and adjust their strategies.
References
Al-Kodmany, K. (2015). Tall buildings and elevators: A review of recent technological
advances. Buildings, 5(3), 1070-1104.

Al-Kodmany, K. (2022). Sustainable high-rise buildings: Toward resilient built

environment. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 4, 782007.

Benton-Short, L., & Short, J. R. (2013). Cities and nature. Routledge.

Bryde, D., Broquetas, M., & Volm, J. M. (2013). The project benefits of building
information modelling (BIM). International journal of project management, 31(7), 971-980.

Bui, N., Merschbrock, C., & Munkvold, B. E. (2016). A review of Building Information
Modelling for construction in developing countries. Procedia Engineering, 164, 487-494.

Chen, S., & Li, Y. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Two Energy-Efficient Technologies Used in
the Shanghai Tower. Energy and Power Engineering, 14(1), 1-12.

DAY, K. (2014). The Shanghai paradox. Architecture MPS.

 Dmitriev, A. N., Vladimirova, I. L., Kallaur, G. Y., & Tsygankova, A. A. (2019).
Approaches to Classifying Building Innovations while Implementing Information Modeling and
Project Management. Journal of Engineering Science & Technology Review, 12(2).

Edition, P. S. (2018). A guide to the project management body of knowledge. Project

Management Institute. Pensylvania.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An
overview. Project management journal, 45(2), 6-19.

Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and risk:
An anatomy of ambition. Cambridge university press.

Gong, J. (2017). Shanghai tower. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 4(1), 106-

109.

Hu, G., Zhu, S., Gao, R., & Xiao, L. (2021, November). Modeling and analysis of
Shanghai Tower based on Ansys Workbench. In 2021 4th International Symposium on Traffic
Transportation and Civil Architecture (ISTTCA) (pp. 312-319). IEEE.

Moon, K. S. (2015). Supertall Asia/Middle East: technological responses and

contextual impacts. Buildings, 5(3), 814-833.

Morris, P. (2013). Reconstructing project management reprised: A knowledge

perspective. Project Management Journal, 44(5), 6-23.

Ong, A. H. (2011). Introduction: Worlding cities, or the art of being global.

Parker, D., & Wood, A. (2013). Shanghai Tower, Shanghai, China. In The Tall Buildings
Reference Book (pp. 450-453). Routledge.

Shen, J., Kee, G., Shen, J., & Kee, G. (2017). Shanghai: Urban development and
regional integration through mega projects (pp. 119-151). Springer International Publishing.

Urban, F. (2013). Tower and slab: histories of global mass housing. Routledge.

Williams, T., & Samset, K. (2010). Issues in front-end decision making on

projects. Project management journal, 41(2), 38-49.

Xia, J., Poon, D., & Mass, D. (2010). Case Study: Shanghai Tower. CTBUH J, 2010, 12-
18.
 Xia, J., Poon, D., & Mass, D. (2010). Case Study: Shanghai Tower. CTBUH J, 2010,
12-18.

Xue, C. Q., & Ding, G. (2018). A history of design institutes in China: From Mao to
market. Routledge.

Hillson, D. (2012). Managing risk in projects. Gower Publishing, Ltd.

Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling,

and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.

Kotter, J. P. (1996). Why transformation efforts fail. The Journal of Product Innovation
Management, 2(13), 170.

McDonald, R. M., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2020). Parallel play: Startups, nascent markets,
and effective business-model design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(2), 483-523.

Mok, K. Y., Shen, G. Q., & Yang, J. (2015). Stakeholder management studies in mega
construction projects: A review and future directions. International journal of project
management, 33(2), 446-457.

Warner, K. S., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital
transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long range planning, 52(3), 326-349.

Wayne Gould, R. (2012). Open innovation and stakeholder engagement. Journal of

technology management & innovation, 7(3), 1-11.