DEARBORN PUBLIC SCHOOLS

SPECIAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL REPORT

CONFIDENTIAL

Student Name: Betty Rubble Examiner: Kristen Wrase

Date of Birth: 6/30/07 Date of Report: 2/2/16
Age: 8 years, 7 months Current Eligibility: N/A
Grade: 3 School: River Oaks
Dates of Evaluation: 1/12, 1/19, 1/27

Reason for Referral

Betty was referred by her father to determine if she meets eligibility for a Specific Learning
Disability (SLD) due to concerns with her learning.

Background Information and Parent Input

Betty’s father denied any issues with the neither pregnancy nor delivery of Betty. Walking was not
achieved until 16 months, and it was reported that her speech was difficult to understand until she
was 3 year old. No medical concerns were reported. Dad reported he received special education
services when he was in school for a learning disability. Currently, Betty lives with her father, but
also spends a lot of time with other family members due to dad’s work schedule.

Per parent report, Betty attended part of Kindergarten and part of first grade at Webb Elementary in
Hazel Park. The remainder of her 1st grade year and the first two months of 2 nd grade occurred in
Clinton Township. Starting at the end of October 2014, Betty attended Howe in Dearborn until the
end of the ’14-’15 school year. Betty has been at River Oaks since the beginning of this year. Her
attendance this year and historically has been very poor. At the beginning of this year, her DRA
level was a 4 which places her reading at the end of Kindergarten level. Betty struggles with sight
word recall and recognizing words in context. Deficits in all academic areas were reported by
Betty’s teacher. On the NWEA district assessments, Betty has made significant improvement in both
areas from the fall to winter measures, however, she is still functioning 2 or more years below grade
level. Betty has been referred to the school MTSS/RTI team and been receiving supplemental
academic support through this process.

Standardized Evaluations
Assessments Administered
 Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – 5 th Edition (WISC-V)
 Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement – 3rd Edition (KTEA-III)

Behavioral Observation During Evaluation

Betty was cooperative and was willing to come to the testing area during each session. She was able
to engage in casual conversation and rapport was established. Betty put forth good effort on all
subtests. She tended to need a few extra examples or directions repeated in order to be successful.
Betty also changed her answers frequently or would say “hold on” after giving a first response.
These results can be considered valid and reliable measures of her cognitive functioning at this time.
 Betty Rubble
Psychoeducational Report
Date of Report: 2/2/16
Page 2 of 4

Interpretation Guide
Interpretation of Assessment Tools
Standard Score Percentile Rank Description
131+ 98+ Upper Extreme
116-130 68-98 Above
Average
85-115 16-84 Average
70-84 2-14 Below Average
<70 <0.1-2 Lower Extreme
The table above may be used to interpret
all scores discussed in this report unless otherwise specified.

Cognitive Assessment
Cognitive Assessment Results (by CHC Factor Cluster)

CHC Cluster / Subtest SS Description CHC Cluster / Subtest SS Description

Crystallized 62 Lower Extreme Long Term Retrieval 88 Average

Knowledge (Gc) (Glr)
WISC-V Similarities 65 Lower Extreme KTEA-III Associational 83 Below Average
Fluency
WISC-V Vocabulary 65 Lower Extreme KTEA-III Object Naming 96 Average
Fluency
Visual – Spatial 86 Average Auditory Processing X Weakness
Thinking (Gv) (Ga)
WISC-V Block Design 85 Average KTEA-III Phonological 81 Below Average
Processing
WISC-V Visual 90 Average WJ-IV ACH Word Attack 41 Lower Extreme
Puzzles
Short – Term 76 Below Average Processing Speed (Gs) 98 Average
Memory (Gsm)
WISC-V Digit Span 80 Below Average WISC-V Coding 100 Average

WISC-V Picture Span 95* Average WISC-V Symbol Search 95 Average

WISC-V Letter 80 Below Average Fluid Reasoning (Gf) 79 Below Average

Number Sequencing
Note: If * next to the standard score, this subtest was WISC-V Matrix 80 Below Average
administered but was not used to calculate the CHC Reasoning
factor score, as it is an outlier. If X, unable to report a WISC-V Figure Weights 85 Average
CHC factor score; please see the description for
qualitative information.

This examiner obtained an estimate of Betty’s seven cognitive processes by administering select
subtests from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – 5 th Edition (WISC-V), Kaufman
 Betty Rubble
Psychoeducational Report
Date of Report: 2/2/16
Page 3 of 4

Assessment Battery for Children – 3rd Edition (KABC-III), as well as integrating parts of the
Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement- 4 th Edition (WJ-IV) which was administered by the
Teacher Consultant. These tools consist of a variety of subtests that measure different facets of
thinking ability. It is important to note that the obtained scores are estimates of functioning and not
permanent fixed numbers. Other factors that can affect these scores may include fatigue, motivation,
mood, distractions, etc. The table above summarizes Betty’s cognitive testing results. Major
cognitive processing areas are capitalized in bold, while the subtests that comprise the major
processing areas are listed below the respective label.

Betty performed within normal limits, where a standard score of 85 or greater was received, in three
of the areas assessed. Wayne County criteria stipulate that in order to determine whether or not a
student has an otherwise normal cognitive profile, three cognitive strengths need to be obtained,
which Betty does have. That being said, Betty does not have age appropriate verbal or nonverbal
cognitive processing skills, which are the two most heavily involved cognitive processes in regards to
learning and academic success. For this reason, it is the opinion of this examiner (based on Dearborn
Public Schools criteria) that Betty does not have an otherwise normal cognitive profile, meaning her
overall abilities fall below expected for her age.

The following were areas in which Betty performed at or above expectations for her age. Processing
Speed (Gs=98) refers to the ability to rapidly identify visual information, to make quick and accurate
decisions, and to rapidly implement those decisions. Visual-Spatial Thinking (Gv=86) is the ability
to apply spatial reasoning and analyze visual details.  Betty was successful with Long-Term
Retrieval (Glr=88) which is the ability to store information and fluently retrieve it at a given time
(minutes or longer).

The following cognitive skills were areas in which Betty performed below expectations for her age.
Crystallized Knowledge (Gc=62) refers to a person’s verbal reasoning system with word knowledge
acquisition, information retrieval, ability to reason and solve verbal problems, and communication of
knowledge. Fluid Reasoning (Gf=79) is the ability to abstract conceptual information from visual
details and to apply that knowledge. Short-Term Memory (Gsm=76) is the ability to identify visual
and auditory information, maintain it in temporary storage, and re-sequence it for use in problem
solving. Auditory Processing (Ga) is the ability to discriminate, analyze, and synthesize auditory
stimuli. While a CHC factor score cannot be reported, as her subtest scores were too discrepant from
one another, both scores were below expectations for her age. This means the Ga score can be
assumed to also be below expectations for her age.

Summary and Recommendations

Betty's father requested an evaluation in order to determine if Betty has a learning disability. Over
various measures, it was determined that Betty does not have an otherwise normal cognitive profile.
She exhibited strengths with long term memory, visual spatial processing, and processing speed. She
struggled with verbal and nonverbal reasoning, short term memory, and auditory processing.
Eligibility under SLD is not supported at this time, due to below average cognitive ability. While
some of Betty’s cognitive scores are possibly suggestive of a Cognitive Impairment (CI), deficits
with adaptive behavior have not been reported. In addition, her achievement scores in math do not
fall within the expected threshold for CI eligibility. An evaluation for CI is not indicated at this time,
in the opinion of this examiner. If staff or parents would like this evaluation to be completed, this
 Betty Rubble
Psychoeducational Report
Date of Report: 2/2/16
Page 4 of 4

can be considered in the future, as it is not being ruled out at this time. In addition, this examiner
feels some of the cognitive deficits being noted at this time are a result of lack of consistent
instruction, due to attending numerous schools and high numbers of absences. It may be appropriate
to do another evaluation in the future for SLD, as she did exhibit 3 cognitive strengths and her Gf
score is only 6 points below the Average range. This would be appropriate if Betty can stay at River
Oaks for an adequate interval of time, significantly improve her attendance, and documentation of
intensive intervention and lack of progress can be documented.

____________________________
Kristen Wrase
School Psychologist
Dearborn Public Schools
wrasek@[Link]
313-827-8326