0% found this document useful (0 votes)
104 views4 pages

RT CHARM Protocol Summary A221505

This document summarizes the Alliance A221505 clinical trial protocol, which compared conventional fractionation (50 Gy in 25 fractions) to hypofractionated fractionation (42.5 Gy in 16 fractions) for post-mastectomy radiation therapy in breast cancer patients undergoing reconstruction. The primary objective was to evaluate reconstruction complication rates at 24 months between the two arms. Over 800 patients were accrued from 2018-2021 across multiple sites before the study closed to accrual. Results are estimated to be complete in 2035.

Uploaded by

api-635954562
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
104 views4 pages

RT CHARM Protocol Summary A221505

This document summarizes the Alliance A221505 clinical trial protocol, which compared conventional fractionation (50 Gy in 25 fractions) to hypofractionated fractionation (42.5 Gy in 16 fractions) for post-mastectomy radiation therapy in breast cancer patients undergoing reconstruction. The primary objective was to evaluate reconstruction complication rates at 24 months between the two arms. Over 800 patients were accrued from 2018-2021 across multiple sites before the study closed to accrual. Results are estimated to be complete in 2035.

Uploaded by

api-635954562
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Trial Schema
  • Introduction
  • Treatment Plan
  • Radiation Therapy
  • Outcomes
  • References

Kearla Bentz Protocol Summary 1

Introduction
The Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology sponsored the clinical trial A221505: RT
CHARM (NCT03414970), a phase III randomized trial of hypofractionated (HF) post
mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) with breast reconstruction.1 This trial was initiated to test
if a shorter course of radiation is as safe as the current standard of care for PMRT. There has
been a recent shift to shorter, more cost effective, and convenient treatment course.2 Previous
studies have established HF radiation therapy (RT) as a standard of care for most early-stage
breast cancer, but the use of HF RT for PMRT is under investigation.3 This trial was intended to
resolve the questions of radiation-related complication rates of PMRT using HF RT, and if HF is
safe when treating regional nodal volumes.2
Trial Schema
For this trial the patient was required to have a mastectomy with nodal
evaluation/dissection, with or without adjuvant chemotherapy, with planned breast
reconstruction. The reconstruction could occur immediately following the mastectomy or within
8 months following RT. The patient was then randomized to either arm 1 or arm 2. Arm 1 was
the conventional PMRT of 50 Gy in 25 fractions, once daily over 5-6 weeks. Arm 2 was the HF
PMRT of 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions, once daily over 3-4 weeks.2
Objectives
The primary objective of this trial was to evaluate whether the reconstruction
complication rate at 24 months post radiation is non-inferior with HF. It also evaluated the rate
of complications and recurrence based on reconstruction method and timing. Additionally, it
compared photographic cosmetic scores, incidence of lymphedema, patient satisfaction, and
costs between the 2 treatment arms.1,4
Eligibility
In order to be eligible for this trial the patient had to be at least 18 years of age with
histologically confirmed invasive carcinoma of the breast (ductal, lobular, mammary, medullary,
or tubular cancers), metastatic breast cancer was not accepted. The patient was required to have
negative inked histologic margins and had to be planning on reconstruction and regional lymph
node RT, including the internal mammary nodes (IMN). Patients were ineligible if they had a
history of prior or concurrent contralateral invasive breast cancer or if they received prior
Kearla Bentz Protocol Summary 2

radiation to the chest, neck or axilla. They also were ineligible if they had other medical
conditions with life expectancy < 5 years.4
Treatment Plan
The treatment plan for this trial included surgery, reconstruction, RT, and optional
chemotherapy. Surgically the patients had to have either a total, simple, skin-sparing, nipple-
sparing, or modified radical mastectomy with pathological staging. They also had to have either
a sentinel node biopsy or axillary dissection. Reconstruction of the chest wall had to occur
immediately following the mastectomy or within 8 months of completing PMRT. Depending on
the arm of the trial the patient was in they received conventional PMRT or HF RT within 84 days
of the mastectomy or adjuvant chemo, no RT boost plans were to be incorporated. Chemotherapy
was optional and could be neoadjuvant or adjuvant, but could not be concurrent with RT. There
had to be at 21 days between chemotherapy and RT and the mastectomy had to occur within 56
days of finishing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.2
Radiation Therapy
In either of the trial treatment arms photons or electrons could be used, no proton
treatments, and either 3D-CRT or IMRT were allowed. A 3-dimensional treatment planning CT
was required post-mastectomy with the patient in the supine position and optimally position per
the physician’s discretion. Methods to minimize cardiac exposure and the use of bolus were
allowed at the discretion of the physician. Radio-opaque markers had to be placed on the
mastectomy scar and “at risk” chest wall. If an expander was placed prior to the simulation it had
to remain in the same expansion as the scan until completion of RT, unless it was an air expander
then it had to be deflated for the planning scan and all treatments.5
Targets that had to be contoured on the 3D treatment planning scan had to include the
chest wall and regional nodes, including the undissected axilla nodes, supraclavicular nodes, and
IMN. The OAR that were required for this protocol were the ipsilateral and contralateral long,
the contralateral breast, the heart, and the thyroid. Specific compliance to dosimetric constraints
had to be followed per protocol or variation acceptable. There were dose requests for the chest
wall PTV, supraclavicular PTV, axillary PTV, and IMN PTV to receive optimal coverage
without significant dose above the prescription. Additionally, each OAR had strict dose
constraints in this protocol that had to be followed per protocol or variation acceptable.4
Outcomes
Kearla Bentz Protocol Summary 3

The outcomes of this study have not been posted. This study started accrual in February
of 2018. After an accrual of 897 patients the study was closed in September of 2021. The
primary completion date is estimated to be February of 2024. The study and results are estimated
to be compete in August of 2035.4
Kearla Bentz Protocol Summary 4

References
1. Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. Closed to accrual: alliance A221505 (RT
CHARM). E-Newsletter. September 2021. Accessed July 15, 2023.
[Link]
Public/News-Closed-Sept2021
2. Poppe M.M. Alliance A221505: RT CHARM: Phase III randomized trial of
hypofractionated post mastectomy radiation with breast reconstruction. Huntsman Cancer
Hospital, University of Utah. Accessed July 15, 2023.
[Link]
Annual%20Meeting/files/[Link]
3. Sayan M., Yehia Z.A., Ohri N., Haffty B.G. Hypofractionated postmastectomy radiation
therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020;6(1):100618. Published November 21, 2020. Accessed
July 18, 2023. [Link]
4. National Institute of Health. Hypofractionated radiation therapy after mastectomy in
preventing recurrence in patient with stage IIa-IIIa breast cancer. Accessed July 20, 2023.
[Link]
5. Alliance for Clinic Trials in Oncology. Clinical protocol document for trial A221505:
hypofractionated post mastectomy radiation with breast reconstruction.

Common questions

Powered by AI

In the A221505 trial, patient positioning played a significant role in accurately delivering radiation doses while protecting surrounding tissue. The trial required patients to be positioned supine with optimal positioning per physician discretion. Correct positioning ensures appropriate targeting of cancerous tissues while minimizing exposure to critical structures like the heart and lungs, thereby reducing the risk of adverse effects and enhancing treatment precision .

Eligibility criteria for the A221505 trial included being at least 18 years of age with histologically confirmed invasive carcinoma of the breast and a mastectomy with nodal evaluation/dissection. Patients with metastatic breast cancer, those who received prior radiation to the chest, neck, or axilla, or those with other medical conditions reducing life expectancy to less than 5 years were excluded. These criteria ensured a specific patient population was targeted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HF PMRT in a controlled manner .

The A221505 trial is designed to measure long-term outcomes such as reconstruction complication rates, recurrence rates, cosmetic results, incidence of lymphedema, patient satisfaction, and relative costs. These outcomes will inform the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated radiation therapy as a standard of care postmastectomy, potentially influencing guidelines and offering a basis for future treatment strategies in breast cancer management .

Patient satisfaction outcomes from the A221505 trial could significantly influence healthcare policy by highlighting the importance of patient-centered care models. High satisfaction rates with HF PMRT could lead to policy shifts towards adopting shorter radiation schedules, prioritizing treatments that align with patient preferences and lifestyle needs. Policymakers may be encouraged to advocate for integrating patient satisfaction metrics in evaluating new medical protocols, potentially reshaping standards of care in oncology .

The potential benefits of using HF RT in the A221505 trial are primarily related to shorter treatment duration, improved patient convenience, and potential cost-efficiency. HF RT can reduce the burden on healthcare systems and improve patient quality of life by minimizing disruption to daily activities. However, challenges include ensuring non-inferiority in terms of safety and complication rates compared to conventional PMRT. There is also the technical challenge of delivering precise dosage while minimizing exposure to surrounding healthy tissue .

The timing of reconstruction in the A221505 trial could significantly influence outcomes such as complication rates and cosmetic results. Reconstruction was allowed either immediately following mastectomy or within 8 months after completing PMRT, which could affect the healing process and integration with radiation effects. Immediate reconstruction may involve heightened risk of complications due to concurrent healing processes, while delayed reconstruction may allow for better recovery post-radiation .

Patients in the A221505 trial were randomized into two arms. Arm 1 received conventional PMRT of 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5-6 weeks. Arm 2 received HF PMRT of 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions over 3-4 weeks .

Dosimetric constraints in the A221505 trial ensured that radiation doses adhered to safety and efficacy guidelines, optimizing therapeutic effects while minimizing harm to organs at risk (OAR). Specific dose limits were set for the chest wall, supraclavicular, axillary, and internal mammary nodes (IMN) to avoid excessive radiation that could damage healthy tissue. Compliance with these constraints was crucial for maintaining patient safety and achieving the primary endpoint of non-inferiority in complication rates .

The A221505 trial incorporates advancements in radiation technology by permitting the use of 3D-CRT or IMRT and other methods to minimize cardiac exposure. These technologies enhance the precision of radiation dose delivery, allowing for better sparing of healthy tissues and potentially reducing side effects. This precision is critical in shortening treatment courses without compromising the efficacy or safety of therapy, thus supporting the trial's objectives .

The primary objective of the A221505 clinical trial was to evaluate whether the reconstruction complication rate at 24 months post-radiation is non-inferior with hypofractionated (HF) postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). This impacts the treatment of PMRT by potentially validating a shorter, more cost-effective course that could be more convenient for patients without increasing complication rates .

Kearla Bentz
Protocol Summary
1
Introduction
The Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology sponsored the clinical trial A22150
Kearla Bentz
Protocol Summary
2
radiation to the chest, neck or axilla. They also were ineligible if they had other medical
Kearla Bentz
Protocol Summary
3
The outcomes of this study have not been posted. This study started accrual in February 
of 2
Kearla Bentz
Protocol Summary
4
References
1. Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. Closed to accrual: alliance A221505 (

You might also like