0% found this document useful (0 votes)
42 views4 pages

Operational Auditing: Key Concepts & Phases

This document provides an overview of operational auditing, including: 1) The purpose of internal auditing and operational audits in helping organizations accomplish objectives. 2) The key phases of operational audits - planning, fieldwork, and reporting. Planning involves risk assessment and determining audit objectives. Fieldwork involves testing processes and controls. Reporting involves communicating findings, observations, and recommendations. 3) The skills required for effective operational audits, including competency in relevant areas and behaviors. Auditors should acquire these skills both individually and at the audit unit level.

Uploaded by

Lorence Ibañez
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
42 views4 pages

Operational Auditing: Key Concepts & Phases

This document provides an overview of operational auditing, including: 1) The purpose of internal auditing and operational audits in helping organizations accomplish objectives. 2) The key phases of operational audits - planning, fieldwork, and reporting. Planning involves risk assessment and determining audit objectives. Fieldwork involves testing processes and controls. Reporting involves communicating findings, observations, and recommendations. 3) The skills required for effective operational audits, including competency in relevant areas and behaviors. Auditors should acquire these skills both individually and at the audit unit level.

Uploaded by

Lorence Ibañez
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Module 1: Introduction to Operational Auditing

● Internal auditing is an independent, objective assurance and consulting activity


designed to add value and improve an organization’s operations. It helps an organization
accomplish its objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and
improve the effectiveness of risk management, control, and governance processes.

● Auditing Beyond Accounting, Financial, and Regulatory Requirements


- increase in stakeholder demands for advisory and consulting activities.

● The value auditors provide


- identify relevant stakeholders and to understand their interests. It is also important to
understand the power they have to assert these interests
- result in more effective and value-added reviews
- stakeholders can help to attain the organizational objectives

● Identifying Operational Threats and Vulnerabilities


- future oriented, risk-oriented

● The Skills Required for Effective Operational Audits


- the auditors should be competent and equipped with necessary behavioral skills
- how to acquire these skills should be done along two dimensions: one at the individual
level and the other at the internal audit unit level.

● Key Objectives of Operational Audits


- must first determine whose objectives the engagement is intending to address
- internal audit should be careful not to define the objectives unilaterally
- internal auditors should get management involvement as much as possible to make
sure that the review will meet their needs.
- the objectives for the review could be driven by:
- New rules
- Poor performance
- Compliance issues
- Anomalous revenues or expenses

● Phases of the Operational Audit


-- Like traditional audits, operational audits are also structured in the traditional planning,
fieldwork, and reporting phases. These provide a simple, effective, and time-tested
approach to organizing, performing, and communicating the results of the work done.

o Planning
▪ Planning is arguably the most important part of an audit.
▪ The proverb: “Failing to plan is planning to fail” comes to mind
▪ The planning process begins long before the actual audit begins. The
starting point should be the performance of a risk assessment that
allows the CAE (Chief Audit Executive) to prepare an audit plan based on
the results of an analysis of the organization’s audit universe.
▪ The audit universe consists of all auditable activities such as accounts,
processes, programs, and functions within an organization, and the risks
associated with their ability to achieve their objectives. At this point, the
risk assessment is done at the enterprise level.

o Fieldwork
▪ The next phase in the engagement’s life cycle is fieldwork.

▪ This phase is when most of the testing is performed, and it includes


interviewing, documenting, applying testing methodologies, managing
fieldwork, and providing status updates. It consists primarily of two things:

● Determining if the process or program under review is designed


effectively so that the related goals and objectives are likely to be
achieved

● Verify that the controls in place are performing as designed by


management

▪ During planning, the auditors obtain and review the documents received,
analyze data, hold meetings with process owners, and may find there are
obvious issues even at this stage. The question then must be asked: Is
that planning or testing? The auditor may identify reportable conditions
during the planning phase, even though identifying issues is usually
considered an aspect of testing. In the end, it doesn’t matter much. The
anomalous condition should be documented. Separating the engagement
into phases does not mean that the activities are necessarily exclusive of
each other. Activities may straddle the category and even reportable
conditions could be identified during the planning phase.

▪ Types of Audit Evidence


● Testimonial
● Observation
o The auditee knows that the auditor is observing
o The auditee does not know that the auditor is observing
● Document Inspection
● Recalculation/Reperformance

o Reporting
▪ The third phase of the audit is the communication of results, often
referred to as reporting.

▪ It consists of communicating findings, observations, and best practices


noted during the review, and developing recommendations for
corrective action.

▪ Findings are the documentation of deviations from what was expected


and form the basis for the audit report

● To the extent that the auditor documents the criteria, condition,


cause, effect, and recommendation (CCCER) items, it will
make it more persuasive and the reader will be more likely to
be convinced that the problem requires correction.

▪ 2 types of deficiencies:

● Design

● Operating

▪ Findings should be discussed with the process owners and other


relevant stakeholders before being included in the report.

▪ While the CCCER model includes R for recommendation, this doesn’t


mean that the auditor has to formulate every recommendation every
time. Telling the auditees what to do presents two key problems:

● Dependency. When told every time what to do, process owners


don’t develop the ability to think for themselves and identify
some possible alternatives to correct the problem.

● Lack of ownership. Recall that management owns the


programs, processes, their objectives, related risks, and
controls. All activities performed should exist because they help
achieve the program or processes’ objectives.

o Follow-Up
- After findings are reported, it is incumbent on both management and
auditors to verify that the corrective actions are in fact applied and the
problems fixed as expected.

- It is the goal that all auditors should pursue as it demonstrates that


internal audit not only identified a problem, but also identified the root
cause of the problem, and the agreed-upon corrective action corrected
the deficiency.

Common questions

Powered by AI

The key phases of an operational audit are planning, fieldwork, and reporting. Planning is the foundational step where auditors conduct a risk assessment and prepare a structured audit plan, providing direction and clarity for the audit . During fieldwork, auditors execute the plan by testing controls, interviewing stakeholders, and gathering audit evidence . The reporting phase involves communicating findings and recommendations effectively to stakeholders, highlighting any deviations and suggesting corrective actions for improvements . Each phase is interdependent and contributes to a systematic and disciplined audit process that supports the organization’s objectives .

The planning phase is critical because it sets the direction and framework for the entire audit engagement. Effective planning involves risk assessment at the enterprise level to identify and prioritize auditable activities, thus ensuring that key risk areas are addressed . Proper planning facilitates thorough understanding and allocation of resources, resulting in a structured approach to the audit and minimizing the risk of oversight . Additionally, early identification of potential issues can occur during planning, which allows auditors to tailor their approach and focus on high-risk areas, enhancing the overall effectiveness of the audit .

Operational auditors should remain flexible and adaptable in the identification of reportable conditions, recognizing that issues can emerge during both the planning and fieldwork phases. Although traditionally associated with testing during fieldwork, auditors may identify reportable conditions in the planning phase by reviewing documents, analyzing data, and interacting with process owners . When such conditions are identified early, it prompts auditors to adjust their focus during the subsequent fieldwork phase, ensuring that high-risk areas receive the necessary attention and resources . This proactive approach aids in developing a comprehensive and well-documented audit report.

Including both design and operating deficiencies in audit reports is important because it provides a comprehensive view of a system’s effectiveness. Design deficiencies indicate flaws in system structure, while operating deficiencies highlight issues in the implementation . Communicating these deficiencies allows stakeholders to understand the full scope of potential risks and areas for improvement. Reports should clearly differentiate between these deficiencies, using the CCCER model to document criteria, condition, cause, effect, and recommendations . This structured approach facilitates informed decision-making and prioritized corrective actions by stakeholders.

The CCCER (Criteria, Condition, Cause, Effect, Recommendation) model is vital in the reporting phase of an operational audit as it provides a structured framework for documenting findings. It helps in clearly identifying the basis of findings, expectations versus actual conditions, underlying causes, and the implications of identified issues . This comprehensive approach ensures that audit reports are persuasive and actionable, guiding management in implementing effective corrective actions . By detailing these components, auditors enhance the clarity and impact of their reports, thus facilitating better decision-making and improvement initiatives within the organization.

Providing recommendations in audit reports can influence process owners' ownership and independence. While recommendations offer clear guidance for corrective actions, they may inadvertently create dependency on auditors if process owners rely solely on external advice . Auditors need to balance providing recommendations with encouraging process owners to develop their problem-solving capabilities, ensuring they retain ownership and accountability for their processes . This approach fosters a sense of responsibility, empowering process owners to address issues autonomously and sustainably, while also safeguarding the auditors' role as independent evaluators.

Management plays a crucial role in the follow-up of audit findings by ensuring that corrective actions are implemented effectively and sustain long-term improvements. As owners of the processes and risks, management's involvement is essential for tracking progress and addressing any barriers that may hinder corrective action . Active management participation in follow-up not only reinforces accountability but also supports a culture of continuous improvement by addressing root causes rather than only symptoms. Auditors collaborate with management to verify that changes achieve the intended outcomes, demonstrating the audit function’s role in driving organizational enhancement .

Effective operational auditors must possess a combination of technical and behavioral skills to conduct audits that add value. Necessary skills include competency in risk management, control assessment, and stakeholder engagement . Development of these skills should occur at two levels: individually, through ongoing education and training, and within the audit unit, by fostering an environment that encourages skill-building and knowledge sharing . This dual approach ensures that auditors are well-equipped to handle various audit challenges and can operate effectively within a team environment.

Stakeholder demands in internal and operational auditing are crucial as they drive the shift towards more advisory and consulting roles beyond traditional financial and regulatory requirements . Auditors should identify relevant stakeholders, understand their interests, and assess their influence and power. This ensures that the audit reviews are not only effective but also value-added, aligning with organizational objectives and enhancing stakeholder relationships . This integration requires auditors to continuously engage with stakeholders throughout the audit process, ensuring their needs and concerns are addressed, thus increasing the audit’s impact and relevance.

Auditors can align audit engagement objectives with the organization’s broader goals by engaging with management and relevant stakeholders during the planning phase to understand their priorities and objectives . Rather than defining audit objectives unilaterally, auditors should incorporate management input to ensure that the audit scope addresses pertinent risk areas and supports strategic objectives . Additionally, auditors can leverage risk assessments to focus on high-impact areas, thus ensuring that the audit not only mitigates risks but also adds value toward achieving organizational goals.

You might also like