RAM Analysis for Oil and Gas Efficiency
RAM Analysis for Oil and Gas Efficiency
Maintainability (RAM)
2
Reliability Availability and
Maintainability (RAM)
Analisis
3
Performance
Introduction Drop
Start Up Operation
100%
10 years Operation
80%
Improvement
When ??
Life-Cycle
Improvement
Improvement ??
Introduction
RAM
operational reliability
❖ MTTF
Maintainability
as ability to be timely and easily
maintained (including servicing,
inspection and check, repair and/or
Reliability Maintainability modification
❖ MTTR
7
Implemented of Asset Integrity Management System (AIMS) using RAM Analysis for Power Plants
Objective Objective
Reliability Aspect
Safety Aspect
9
Implemented of Asset Integrity Management System (AIMS) using RAM Analysis for Power Plants
DEFINITION
Reliability
❑ The probability that an item (or a system) can perform its intended function for
a specified time interval under stated operation conditions.
(MIL-STD-721C,1981) 44
To provide a general definition for the reliability of an item one must address a
minimum of three elements :
10
Implemented of Asset Integrity Management System (AIMS) using RAM Analysis for Power Plants
DEFINITION
Maintainability
MIL-STD-721C (1981)
11
Implemented of Asset Integrity Management System (AIMS) using RAM Analysis for Power Plants
Formula
Maintainability and Repair Time Prediction
( i ti )
i =1
MTTR = n
i
i =1
n = number of subsystems
λ = failure rate of the ith system
t = time to repair the ith unit
12
Implemented of Asset Integrity Management System (AIMS) using RAM Analysis for Power Plants
Reliability theory
Availability Produksi
Availability equipment
13
Reliability theory
Jadwal Maintenance
14
Reliability theory
Reliability - Keandalan
15
Reliability theory
Reliability
• Adalah probability suatu komponen, alat atau system untuk
berfungsi pada selama waktu yang ditetapkan pada kondisi yang
ditentukan.
16
Reliability, Availability, Maintainability
Introduction
Reliability, Availability, Maintainability
Introduction
Reliability, Availability, Maintainability
Introduction
Reliability, Availability, Maintainability
Introduction
Reliability, Availability, Maintainability
Introduction
Introduction
Reliability, Availability, Maintainability
Reliability theory
Reliability theory
Reliability theory
Kapan dikatakan Gagal
Gagal artinya umur komponen lebih rendah dari pada umur yang
direncanakan
Jadwal
Failure time
replacement
Reactive maintenance
Failure Data
3. Historical Failure
45
Failure Data
• Shutdown
Critical • Require
Shutdown
• Derating
• Degradation
Degraded
System
• Alarm
• Internal
Minor
• Component
46
Introduction
Reliability, Availability, Maintainability
48
Reliability theory
Risk - consequency
• Safety
• Heath
• Environment
• Production
• Cost
• Property
49
Reliability theory
50
Reliability
Centered
Maintenance
52
Introduction
Achieving
Excellence
Optimizing Maintenance
Decision Management
Reliability
Management
Availability Level 1
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
SK-GPRF PG Facility SK-Well SK-TGIM SK-NOG
Availability Plant
The higher unavailable occurred in Sungai Kenawang Gas Production Facility and Pulau Gading Gas Production
Facility. Both Gas Production Facilities have many major equipment become bad actor or contributor unavailable
RAM Level System
Availability Level 2
1
0.99
0.98
0.97
0.96
0.95
0.94
0.93
0.92
0.91
GTG Power CO2 RMVL Gas Liquid Sales Gas Produced Air De-Ethinizer Mercury Condensate Fuel Gas MOL Sieve NGL Product
System SPRTR Compressor Water Instrument RMVL HNDL/ Dehydration Shipping
STBLZ
Unreliable Equipment
High failure rate is high contributor unreliable equipment will cause degraded performance equipment and
system and effect to availability system
RAM Level Equipment
Failure Modes GTG
0.00009
0.00008
0.00007
0.00006
0.00005
0.00004
0.00003
0.00002
0.00001
0
Spurious stop Other Abnormal Breakdown Fail to start Faulty output Parameter
Instrument on demand voltage deviation
Failure Rate
Failure rate each failure mode of equipment occurred during operation
RAM Level Equipment
PF Curve Life (B10) : 3962 hrs
Life (B50) : 10162 hrs
1
Breakdown: 30000 hrs
B10, 3962
0.8
0.6
B50, 10162
0.4
0.2
0
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
Non
Asset Criticality Critical
Critical
Alarm, Trip,
Breakdown Partial Emergency
Shutdown Respon
6 Dampak kegagalan
Failure Effect
Asset Failure
Review Failure
Expert 2 Kegagalan hanya mengganggu kinerja peralatan
Effect
Severity
2.7 Frekuensi mode kegagalan
Occurrences
Dengan nilai PoF = 32.97%. Berdasarkan tingkat PoF pada tabel diatas maka
level PoF status indicator valve yaitu 2 unlikely/ Minor
6 Detectability
Detectability
Local
Indicator
Inspeksi/
Online
Maintenance,
Monitoring
Test
Failure
6 Detectability
Detectability
6 Detectability
Detectability
Nilai Kondisi Deskripsi
1 Very Low Kegagalan dapat dengan mudah dideteksi melalui
sistem kontrol monitoring (Online Monitoring)
2 Low Kegagalan dapat dideteksi melalui sistem monitoring
atau local indicator
High Priority
No
Yes
Review
History/ OREDA
Occurances
No New Interval
MDT < Occ and addtional
task
Yes
Existing Task
Workpack
Introduction
RCM Water Injection Pump
14.00%
12.00% 11.31%
11.00%
10.00%
8.70%
8.00%
5.85% 6.06%
6.00%
4.35%
4.00%
1.83%
2.00% 1.08% 1.32%
0.00%
Erratic Internal Noise Other High output Parameter Breakdown Low output External Vibration Overheating External
output leakage deviation leakage - leakage -
Utility Process
medium medium
Failure Modes of WIP
Introduction
General Failure Mechanism
Other Electrical
4% 1%
Process
Instrument
17%
23%
Mechanical
55%
100.00%
80.00%
70.00%
Percentage (%)
60.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
time (hours)
Introduction
Failure Modes of WIP
83
RBD Configuration
RBD Configuration
Plant Site RBD Configuration
Plant Site RBD Configuration
No Item λ system R (t = 1 month ) R( t = 3 months) R( t = 6 months)
1 Separator 4,789E-06 0,9965 0,9897 0,9795
2 Demister 4,789E-06 0,9965 0,9897 0,9795
3 Governor Valve 4,789E-06 0,9965 0,9897 0,9795
4 Main Stop Valve 1,047E-05 0,9924 0,9776 0,9557
5 Turbine 2,341E-05 0,9832 0,9506 0,9038
6 Condenser 0,0001124 0,9222 0,7844 0,6153
7 MCWP 6,03E-09 0,9999 0,9999 0,9999
8 Cooling Tower 2,33E-05 0,9833 0,9509 0,9042
9 Primary Pump 6,932E-09 0,9999 0,9999 0,9999
10 Secondary Pump 2,78E-10 0,9999 0,9999 0,9999
11 Ejector 1 1,925E-05 0,9862 0,9592 0,9202
12 Ejector 2 1,925E-05 0,9862 0,9592 0,9202
13 Inter Condenser 4,789E-06 0,9965 0,9897 0,9795
14 After Condenser 4,789E-06 0,9965 0,9897 0,9795
15 Inter Cooler 1,376E-10 0,9999 0,9999 0,9999
R total = 0,8461 0,6057 0,3669
86
Plant Site RBD Configuration
Grafik
Reliability Reliabilityof Time
As Function
0
0 5 10 15 20
Waktu ( Bulan
Time )
(Months) 8
87
Plant Site RBD Configuration
No Item MTBF ( jam ) MTTR ( jam ) Availability
1 Separator 208824 3 0.9999
2 Demister 208824 2 0.9999
3 Governor Valve 208824 8.1 0.9999
4 Main Stop Valve 95536.5 1.38 0.9999
5 Turbine 42711.1 53 0.9987
6 Condenser 8896.6 5.18 0.9994
7 MCWP 56410.3 19.2 0.9999
8 Cooling Tower 42914.3 131.3 0.9969
9 Primary Pump 34804 4.2 0.9999
10 Secondary Pump 103877 1.5 0.9999
11 Ejector 1 51938.3 1.2 0.9999
12 Ejector 2 51938.3 1.2 0.9999
13 Inter Condenser 208824 1.4 0.9999
14 After Condenser 208824 1.4 0.9999
15 Inter Cooler 208824 3 0.9999
0.983
88
Plant Site RBD Configuration
No Item MTBF ( jam ) MTTR ( jam ) Availability
1 Separator 208824 3 0.9999
2 Demister 208824 2 0.9999
3 Governor Valve 208824 8.1 0.9999
4 Main Stop Valve 95536.5 1.38 0.9999
5 Turbine 42711.1 53 0.9987
6 Condenser 8896.6 5.18 0.9994
7 MCWP 56410.3 19.2 0.9999
8 Cooling Tower 42914.3 131.3 0.9969
9 Primary Pump 34804 4.2 0.9999
10 Secondary Pump 103877 1.5 0.9999
11 Ejector 1 51938.3 1.2 0.9999
12 Ejector 2 51938.3 1.2 0.9999
13 Inter Condenser 208824 1.4 0.9999
14 After Condenser 208824 1.4 0.9999
15 Inter Cooler 208824 3 0.9999
0.983
89
RAM Analysis Conclusions
1. From RAM analysis it was found that the largest contributor to the plant
shut down is condenser having the highest failure rate. Therefore, to
increase the reliability of the condenser (and thereby the availability of the
plant), proper inspection and maintenance strategy was then planned.
2. It turned out that internal and external corrosion is the primary damage
mechanism in the condenser tubes and structures, therefore more
effective corrosion control should be put in place.
3. It was found that theoretical reliability of the system was 84,61% for 1
month operation compared to actual of 91,74% . The difference was
caused by online restoration program without the need of shutting down
the system.
90
Implemented of Asset Integrity Management System (AIMS) using RAM Analysis for Power Plants
Power System RBD Configuration