0% found this document useful (0 votes)
96 views6 pages

Understanding the Digital Self

The document discusses the concept of the digital self and how people present themselves online. It covers several topics: how the digital self is constructed through social media use; impression management and selective self-presentation strategies used online; the impact of smartphones and social media on cognition, identity development, and well-being; and approaches to guiding youth's technology use. The goal is to help youth develop digital skills to safely and productively engage with technology.

Uploaded by

EMIL J
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
96 views6 pages

Understanding the Digital Self

The document discusses the concept of the digital self and how people present themselves online. It covers several topics: how the digital self is constructed through social media use; impression management and selective self-presentation strategies used online; the impact of smartphones and social media on cognition, identity development, and well-being; and approaches to guiding youth's technology use. The goal is to help youth develop digital skills to safely and productively engage with technology.

Uploaded by

EMIL J
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

UNIT 2: UNPACKING THE SELF

source:[Link]

Lesson 4: The Digital Self


Learning Outcomes:
At the end of the lesson, the student should be able to:
1. Explore the different aspects of the digital self.
2. Identify and situate the self in the use of digital technology and how it affects one’s
identity.
DIGITAL SELF

• The self that is constructed online is generally called the digital self (Otig et al., 2018).
• The term online identity implies that there is a distinction between how people present
themselves online and how they do offline. But any split between “online” and “offline”
identity is narrowing, for two reasons:
1. In contrast to the Internet of the 1990s, people today use social media primarily
to communicate with people they know in “real life” contexts (e.g., home, work,
school, etc.); and
2. Wireless networking and portable devices like smartphones and tablets make it
easy to access social media as part of day-to-day life, rather than having to
formally “log on” to the Internet (Marwick, 2013 as cited in Villafuerte et al., 2018).

A Self-regulated Learning Module 61


I. ONLINE IDENTITY AND ‘SELF’ IN CYBERSPACE: I, Me, Myself and My User ID Online Identity

• Your online identity is not the same as your real-world identity because the
characteristics you represent online differ from the characteristics you represent in the
physical world. Every website you interact with has its own idea of your identity because
each one you visit sees you and your characteristics differently ([Link],
2011 as cited in Villafuerte et al., 2018).

II. SELECTIVE SELF-PRESENTATION AND IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT


Self-presentation refers to how people attempt to present themselves to control or shape how
others (called the audience) view them. It involves expressing oneself and behaving in ways
that create a desired impression. Self-presentation is part of a broader set of behaviors called
impression management ([Link], n.d.).

o Impression management refers to the controlled presentation of information about


all sorts of things, including information about other people or events. Self-
presentation refers specifically to information about the self
([Link], n.d.).

o Impression management is the attempt to control or influence any other people’s


perception (Otig et al., 2018). There are two main motives of attempting to manage
the impression of others:

A Self-regulated Learning Module 62


▪ Instrumental. This motive is to basically gain rewards and increase one’s self-
esteem.
▪ Expressive. This motivation is about attempting to be in control of one’s
personal behavior and identity. It is a response to moral norms, expectations, or
restrictions, seeking to show others that they are different.
WHY DO PEOPLE ENGAGE IN SELF-PRESENTATION? (Otig et al., 2018)
Self-presentation:
o helps facilitate social interaction;
o enables individuals to attain material and social rewards; and
o helps people privately construct desired identities.

Generally, social media platforms are used for:


o social browsing;
o social searching;
o communication; and
o impression management.

Impression management strategies:


o Self-promotion. A proactive process in which a person actively says things or takes
action to show their competence to an audience (Rosenfeld et al., 1995 as cited in
Otig et al., 2018).

o Ingratiation. The process by which someone tries to win the approval or acceptance
of another (Otig et al., 2018).

o Exemplification. A strategic self-sacrifice so that observers may recognize the


dedication. An exemplifier often wants other people to know how hard they have
been working because of the need to advertise their behavior (Rosenfeld et al., 1995
as cited in Otig et al., 2018).

o Intimidation. A strategy that involves showing off authority, power, or the potential to
punish in order to be seen by observers as someone who could be or is dangerous.
This is designed designed to increase the credibility of one’s threats and in turn
enhance the probability that the target will comply with the demands for agreement
(Tedeschi & Riess, 1981 as cited in Otig et al., 2018).

o Supplication. An approach where the individual exploits their weaknesses or


shortcomings to receive help or benefits (Otig et al., 2018).

A Self-regulated Learning Module 63


III. YOUR BRAIN AND SMARTPHONES (Alampay, 2018)

• Notifications, texts, “likes”, new info on your feed – are inherently rewarding & therefore
addictive via the action of dopamine in your brain
• Mere presence of a smartphone in your environment reduces cognitive attention and
capacity
• Long and late-night exposure to the blue light of smartphone screens disrupts melatonin
production and circadian rhythms

IV. THE GENERATION OF DIGITAL NATIVES (Young Adult Fertility and Sexuality, 2013)

• Overall, 78% of the youth owned a cellular phone, slightly more among females (81%)
than males (76%), the older (83%) than the younger (76%) cohort.
 cell phone ownership =  education level, from 51.3% among those with
elementary level schooling to 94.7% among the college educated.
• The regions with the highest prevalence of social networking among internet users are
NCR (88%), Central Luzon, Ilocos and CALABARZON, all at 84%. The prevalence is lowest
in ARMM (61%), SOCCSKSARGEN, CAR and Northern Mindanao, all between 65% to
slightly below 70%.
• Key change: access to the Internet is pervasive—all the time—and access / use has
become private
• May be socially adept online, but may hinder real social skills and other significant life
skills and competencies
o displacement hypothesis

V. THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL MEDIA

• iGen fuse their social lives & personal identities with their social media apps
• Social networking sites are used to initiate, maintain, and deepen social ties – family,
friends, “communities”
• The platform or “stage” where identity explorations are enacted, validated, and
managed
o impression management

THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL MEDIA (O’Keefe, Clarke-Pearson, & Council on Communications and
Media, 2011; Frith, 2017)
On the SELF AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
1. Social connections, belongingness

A Self-regulated Learning Module 64


2. Identity, creativity
3. Community (political) engagement

On ACCESS TO INFORMATION
4. Resources, information and support for schoolwork
5. Health-seeking
6. Misinformation and risks (self-harm)

On RISKS
7. Privacy issues
8. Cyberbullying
9. Body image issues; sexualization
10. Depression

CYBERBULLYING (Alampay, 2018)


• insults, shaming, spreading lies/rumors, social exclusion,
• context, time, audience of bullying extends beyond the school
• anonymity and distance diminish empathy and increase aggression
o disinhibition effect

FEAR OF MISSING OUT (FOMO) (Przbylski, Murayama, DeHaan, & Gladwell, 2013)
• “...the uneasy and sometimes all-consuming feeling that you are missing out – that your
peers are doing, in the know about, or in possession of more or something better than
you.”

SOCIAL MEDIA = SOCIAL COMPARISON


• SOCIAL MEDIA ENVY is a moderate significant predictor of symptoms of depression
among Filipino high school students (Ocampo & Lee-Chua, 2017).

THE GOLDILOCKS HYPOTHESIS (Przybylski & Weinstein, 2017)


too little – deprive youth of “just right” or moderate – too much – mental, health /
benefits of technology and derive benefits without the ill well-being suffer; increase
social media use effects. exposure to risks
• The authors conclude that their findings support the Goldilocks hypothesis and refute
the displacement hypothesis.
- The data suggests that moderate digital screen use may actually be contributing
positively to wellbeing by enabling and empowering people to pursue their goals,
be more active, feel connected with others and enjoy life.

A Self-regulated Learning Module 65


WHAT IS THE HAPPY MEDIUM? THE GOAL?

• 2 hours/weekday; 4 hours/weekend... before negative associations with well-being are


evident (Przybylski & Weinstein, 2017; Valkenburg, n.d.)

BUT MORE IMPORTANT THAN THIS…

• Need to support youths’ digital skills and competencies so they can navigate the
complex world of the Internet and other technologies productively, responsibly, and
safely.

DIFFERENT APPROACHES (Alampay, 2018)


DIGITAL LIMITERS
o minimize use of technology / Internet
o inflexible
o conflict
o subscribe to “alarmist” beliefs

DIGITAL ENABLERS source: [Link]


o allow youth to use as much Internet / technology as they want
o allow youth to set the agenda for technology use
o “they know more than I do”

DIGITAL MENTORS
o play an ACTIVE ROLE in guiding the youth’s use of technology and the Internet

CONCLUSIONS (Alampay, 2018)

• Not that online identity transforms identity but that it makes us more aware that offline
identity was already more multiple, culturally contingent and contextual than we had
appreciated.
• Would be a mistake to conflate plural with superficial, or to assume that identity has
become more individualistic and less subject to social appraisal.

Sources:
Frith, E. (2017). Social media and children’s mental health: A review of the evidence. United Kingdom: Education
Policy Institute.
O’Keefe, G., Clarke-Pearson, K., & Council on Communications and Media (2011). Clinical report: The impact of
social media on children, adolescents, and families. Pediatrics. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-0054

A Self-regulated Learning Module 66

Common questions

Powered by AI

The narrowing distinction between online and offline identities implies that rather than maintaining separate personas, individuals now experience a blend of digital and real-world identities that impact each other reciprocally. This integration is facilitated by constant connectivity through mobile devices, enabling seamless transitions between online interactions and real-world contexts . This interconnectedness influences how identities are constructed, perceived, and appraised socially, challenging traditional notions of a fixed, singular identity and leading to a more dynamic, multifaceted understanding of self . It also necessitates heightened awareness and skill in managing one’s digital presence as both forms of identity co-evolve .

Smartphones impact cognitive attention and overall cognitive capacity by continuously presenting users with notifications, texts, and updates that distract and fragment attention. The mere presence of a smartphone in one's environment has been shown to reduce cognitive attention and capacity because it divides focus between the tasks at hand and potential phone interactions . Furthermore, the addictive nature of smartphone use, driven by the dopamine-reward system, can lead to reduced attention span and decreased ability to engage in sustained, deep focus on tasks outside the digital realm .

Social media significantly influences the self and social development of individuals by serving as a platform for identity exploration, social connections, and engagement in community discussions. For youths, it impacts their sense of belonging and creativity by validating identity explorations through likes and comments, which affect self-esteem and social standing . On a broader scale, these platforms facilitate the initiation, maintenance, and deepening of social ties, allowing users to engage with family, friends, and broader communities . However, social media also presents risks, such as privacy issues and cyberbullying, which can negatively affect mental health and create distorted perceptions of reality due to selective self-presentation .

Impression management plays a crucial role in individuals' interactions on social media by allowing them to control or shape how they are perceived by others. Through various strategies like self-promotion, ingratiation, exemplification, intimidation, and supplication, individuals aim to create favorable impressions that align with their desired self-image . This behavior facilitates social interaction, helps attain rewards, and enables the construction of privately desired identities, thus integrating deeply into the ways relationships and communications are maintained online .

The concept of the 'digital self' challenges traditional notions of personal identity by emphasizing the fluidity and multiplicity of how individuals present themselves through digital platforms. Whereas traditional identity is often considered stable and consistent, the digital self reflects a fragmented presentation that varies across different online contexts. This is due to the selective self-presentation and impression management that individuals engage in online, where they choose which traits to emphasize depending on the platform and audience . The merging of online and offline personas further complicates identity as online interactions influence one's real-life identity, making it a dynamic and evolving construct .

According to the 'Goldilocks Hypothesis', excessive smartphone use can lead to mental health issues, diminish overall well-being, and increase exposure to risks such as anxiety and depression. When digital screen use surpasses moderate levels, it correlates with negative associations with well-being, making it harder for individuals to engage in meaningful in-person social interactions and potentially leading to social media envy, which is linked to depression . Excessive use disrupts the balance needed to derive the positive benefits of technology while avoiding its ill effects .

Social media serves as a crucial platform for political engagement and community building by extending the reach of public discourse and facilitating active participation in political processes. It provides tools for organizing, mobilizing, and vocalizing community interests at both local and global levels, empowering individuals, especially the youth, to engage in civic activities and connect with like-minded individuals . Social media's unique ability to bring diverse voices into conversations and foster a sense of belonging and shared purpose makes it a powerful medium for community building and a catalyst for social change . However, it is also accompanied by challenges like misinformation and echo chamber effects, which can skew understanding and impede healthy democratic discourse .

'Digital limiters', 'digital enablers', and 'digital mentors' represent different strategies of managing technology use among youth based on varying degrees of restriction and guidance. 'Digital limiters' impose strict rules and reduced exposure to technology, usually with the belief that less technology use is protective . 'Digital enablers' take a permissive approach, allowing unlimited technology use, often assuming that young people possess more knowledge about digital tools . Conversely, 'digital mentors' actively guide youth in responsibly navigating and utilizing technology, promoting balanced and informed usage to take advantage of its benefits while mitigating risks .

Mitigating risks such as cyberbullying and misinformation on social media platforms requires a multi-faceted approach involving technological solutions, educational initiatives, and policy reforms. Platforms can implement more robust AI-driven content moderation tools to detect and flag harmful content proactively . Educational initiatives should focus on improving digital literacy, equipping users with skills to critically evaluate online information, and promoting awareness about the impact of online behaviors . Policy reforms might include stronger legal protections and clearer guidelines for users and offenders to discourage harmful activities and support safe online environments . Cross-sector collaboration is essential to create a comprehensive framework addressing these challenges effectively .

The 'Fear of Missing Out' (FOMO), facilitated by social media, adversely affects users' mental health by increasing anxiety and dissatisfaction. The perpetual comparison with others' seemingly perfect lives creates pressure to stay constantly updated and involved, leading to feelings of exclusion and inadequacy if unable to participate in or keep up with peer activities . This can contribute to reduced self-esteem, higher stress levels, and symptoms of depression, as users incessantly fear missing important updates or experiences . Addressing FOMO involves promoting digital literacy and mindful social media use to mitigate its psychological impact .

You might also like