Wireless Communication Overview
Wireless Communication Overview
Waghamare P.S.
Hass Sattiissffacttorr Complletted tthe ssemiinarr worrk Ha Sa ac o Comp e ed he em na wo k
GSM GSM
Forr tthe prracttiicall ffullffiillllmentt off ssyllllabuss off Diiplloma iin Ellecttrroniicss &Telle Fo he p ac ca u men o y abu o D p oma n E ec on c &Te e Communiicattiion examiinattiion ass prresscrriibed by Commun ca on exam na on a p e c bed by Shrriirram Inssttiittutte Off Engiineerriing and Technollogy ((Polly))Paniiv Sh am In u e O Eng nee ng and Techno ogy Po y Pan v
GUIDE HOD principal
( mr. Dirange.M.H.)
( mr. Dirange.M.H.)
([Link].P.P)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
WITH THE BLESSING OF SHRIRAM I COMPLITE THE HOLE WORK. I
HEARTLY THANKS TO MY TEACHERS WHO HAS SUPPORT ME THROUGH OUT MY REPORT.I ALSO THANKS FULL TO MY [Link] &
TELECOMMUNICATION. HAS PRIVIDED THE SUPPORT.I HAVE NEEDE TO PRODUCES AND COMPLETE MY SEMINAR REPORT AND I THANKS TO MY FRIENDS AND MY PARENTS BECAUSE THEY SUPPORTING TO ME THRGOUH OUT MY REPORT THROUGH VARIOUS METHOD.
WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
Arnikar Abhijit Ashok T.Y.E.&T.C. S.I.E.T.(Poly.), Paniv. E-mail: - arnikar11111@[Link]
ABSTRACT
As the evolution of science of leaded towards communication system it was in wired system for near about century. Wireless services have migrated from the conventional voice-centric services to data-centric services. The circuit switched communication network is now being replaced by all-IP packet-switched network. A complete wireless system involves many different areas. It had overcome all the drawbacks that were observed in wired system. Wireless system can communicate over distance of thousands of miles. The wireless communication may be digital or analog. Digital wireless communication means communication taking place due to digits and logical operations, whereas in analog system it takes place due to square, pulse or sinusoidal wave modulation. It needs 1 transmitter, 1 receiver with free media. It uses modulating system such as frequency modulation, phase modulation, amplitude modulation. It uses frequency domains or spectrums for the communication process. It may be simplex, half duplex or full duplex. As a result of technical evolution the most common example of wireless communication is MOBILE PHONE.
Index
Wireless Communication
[Link]
Wireless communication Wireless communication is the transfer of information over a distance without the use of electrical conductors or "wires". The distances involved may be short (a few meters as in television remote control) or long (thousands or millions of kilometers for radio communications). Wireless communication is generally considered to be a branch of telecommunications. Situations Justifying Use of Wireless Technology Wireless networking (i.e. the various types of unlicensed 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi devices) is used to meet many needs. Perhaps the most common use is to connect laptop users who travel from location to location. Another common use is for mobile networks that connect via satellite.
6
A wireless transmission method is a logical choice to network a LAN segment that must frequently change locations. The following situations justify the use of wireless technology:
To span a distance beyond the capabilities of typical cabling, To provide a backup communications link in case of normal network failure, To link portable or temporary workstations, To overcome situations where normal cabling is difficult or financially impractical, or To remotely connect mobile users or networks.
radio frequency communication, microwave communication, for example long-range line-of-sight via highly directional antennas, or short-range communication, or
infrared (IR) short-range communication, for example from remote controls or via Infrared Data Association (IrDA).
Applications may involve point-to-point communication, point-to-multipoint communication, broadcasting, cellular networks and other wireless networks.
This chapter surveys the economics literature on wireless communications. Wireless communications and the economic goods and services that utilise it have some special characteristics that have motivated specialised studies. First, wireless communications relies on a scarce resource namely, radio spectrum the property rights for which were traditionally vested with the state. In order to foster the development of wireless communications (including telephony and broadcasting) those assets were privatised. Second, use of spectrum for wireless communications required the development of key complementary technologies; especially those that allowed higher frequencies to be utilised more efficiently. Finally, because of its special nature, the efficient use of spectrum required the coordinated development of standards. Those standards in turn played a critical role in the diffusion of technologies that relied on spectrum use.
In large part our chapter focuses on wireless telephony rather than broadcasting and other uses of spectrum (e.g., telemetry and biomedical services). Specifically, the economics literature on that industry has focused on factors driving the diffusion of wireless telecommunication technologies and on the nature of network pricing regulation and competition in the industry. By focusing on the economic literature, this chapter complements other surveys in this Handbook. Hausman (2002) focuses on technological and policy developments in mobile telephony rather than economic research per se. Cramton (2002) provides a survey of the theory and practice of spectrum auctions used for privatisation. Armstrong (2002a) and Noam (2002) consider general issues regarding network interconnection and access pricing while Woroch (2002) investigates the potential for wireless technologies as a substitute for local fixed line telephony. Finally, Liebowitz and Margolis (2002) provide a general survey of the economics literature on network effects. In contrast, we focus here solely on the economic literature on the mobile telephony industry. The outline for this chapter is as follows. The next section provides background information regarding the adoption of wireless communication technologies. Section 3 then considers the economic issues associated with mobile telephony including spectrum allocation and standards. Section 4 surveys recent economic studies of the diffusion of mobile telephony. Finally, section 5 reviews issues of regulation and competition; in particular, the need for and principles behind access pricing for mobile phone networks.
[Link]: In 1895, Guglielmo Marconi opened the way for modern wireless communications by transmitting the three-dot Morse code for the letter S over a distance of three kilometers using electromagnetic waves. From this beginning, wireless communications has developed into a key element of modern society. From satellite transmission, radio and television broadcasting to the now ubiquitous mobile telephone, wireless communications has revolutionized the way societies function. . Wireless telegraphy was first used by the British military in South Africa in 1900 during the Anglo-Boer war. The British navy used equipment supplied by Marconi to communicate between ships in Delagoa Bay. Shipping was a major early client for wireless telegraphy and wireless was standard for shipping by the time the Titanic issued its radio distress calls in 1912.
2.1Photophone The world's first, wireless telephone conversation occurred in 1880, when Alexander Graham Bell and Charles Sumner Tainter invented and patented the photophone, a telephone that conducted audio conversations wirelessly over modulated light beams (which are narrow projections of electromagnetic waves). In that distant era when utilities did not yet exist to provide electricity, and lasers had not even been conceived of in science fiction, there were no practical applications for their invention, which was highly limited by the availability of both sunlight and good weather. Similar to free space optical communication, the photophone also required a clear line of sight between its transmitter and its receiver. It would be several decades before the photophone's principles found their first practical applications in military communications and later in fiber-optic communications. 2.2Radio The term "wireless" came into public use to refer to a radio receiver or transceiver (a dual purpose receiver and transmitter device), establishing its usage in the field of wireless telegraphy early on; now the term is used to describe modern wireless connections such as in
cellular networks and wireless broadband Internet. It is also used in a general sense to refer to any type of operation that is implemented without the use of wires, such as "wireless remote control" or "wireless energy transfer", regardless of the specific technology (e.g. radio, infrared, ultrasonic) that is used to accomplish the operation. While Guglielmo Marconi and Karl Ferdinand Braun were awarded the 1909 Nobel Prize for Physics for their contribution to wireless telegraphy. 2.3Early wireless work David E. Hughes, eight years before Hertz's experiments, transmitted radio signals over a few hundred yards by means of a clockwork keyed transmitter. As this was before Maxwell's work was understood, Hughes' contemporaries dismissed his achievement as mere "Induction". In 1885, T. A. Edison used a vibrator magnet for induction transmission. In 1888, Edison deployed a system of signaling on the Lehigh Valley Railroad. In 1891, Edison obtained the wireless patent for this method using inductance (U.S. Patent 465,971). In the history of wireless technology, the demonstration of the theory of electromagnetic waves by Heinrich Hertz in 1888 was important.[3][4] The theory of electromagnetic waves was predicted from the research of James Clerk Maxwell and Michael Faraday. Hertz demonstrated that electromagnetic waves could be transmitted and caused to travel through space at straight lines and that they were able to be received by an experimental apparatus. The experiments were not followed up by Hertz. Jagadish Chandra Bose around this time developed an early wireless detection device and help increase the knowledge of millimeter length electromagnetic waves.[5] Practical applications of wireless radio communication and radio remote control technology were implemented by later inventors, such as Nikola Tesla. 2.4The electromagnetic spectrum Light, colors, AM and FM radio, and electronic devices make use of the electromagnetic spectrum. In the US, the frequencies that are available for use for communication are treated as a public resource and are regulated by the Federal Communications Commission. This determines which frequency ranges can be used for what purpose and by whom. In the absence of such control or alternative arrangements such as a
10
privatized electromagnetic spectrum, chaos might result if, for example, airlines didn't have specific frequencies to work under and an amateur radio operator were interfering with the pilot's ability to land an airplane. Wireless communication spans the spectrum from 9 kHz to 300 GHz. (Also see Spectrum management)
France, the United Kingdom, Greece, Italy and Belgium. However, the reverse holds, with fixed-lines outnumbering mobiles in the United States, Canada, and Argentina. Penetration rates were close to equal in Japan in 2001, but in all countries, mobile penetration is rising much faster than fixed lines. The price for mobile phone services are difficult to compare between countries. In part this reflects exchange rate variations, but more importantly pricing packages and the form of pricing differs significantly between countries. Most obviously, different countries have different charging mechanisms, with calling party pays dominating outside the United States. But in the United States and Canada receiving party pays pricing often applies for calls to mobile telephones. Different packages and bundling of equipment and call charges also make comparisons difficult. A major innovation in mobile telephone pricing in the late 1990s was the use of pre-paid cards. This system, where customers pay in advance for mobile calls rather than being billed at a later date, has proved popular in many countries. For example, in Sweden, prepaid cards gained 25% of the mobile market within two years of their introduction (OECD, 2000, p.11). Despite the changing patterns of pricing, the OECD estimates that there was a 25% fall in the cost of a representative bundle of mobile services over its member countries between 1992 and 1998 (OECD, 2000, p.22).
11
3. PRINCIPLES OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS: Wireless communications begin with a message that is converted into an electronic signal by a device called a transmitter. There are two types of transmitters: analog and digital. An analog transmitter sends electronic signals as modulated radio waves. The analog transmitter modulates the radio wave to carry the electronic signal and then sends the modified radio signal through space. A digital transmitter encodes electronic signals by converting messages into a binary code, the series of zeros and ones that are the basis of all computer programming. The encoded electronic signal is then sent as a radio wave. Devices known as receivers decode or demodulate the radio waves and reproduce the original message over a speaker.
Fig: Principle of wireless communication Wireless communications systems involve either one-way transmissions, in which a person merely receives notice of a message, or two-way transmissions, such as a telephone conversation between two people. An example of a device that only receives one-way transmission is a pager, which is a high-frequency radio receiver. When a person dials a pager
12
number, the pager company sends a radio signal to the desired pager. The encoded signal triggers the pagers circuitry and notifies the customer carrying the pager of the incoming call with a tone or a vibration, and often the telephone number of the caller. Advanced pagers can display short messages from the caller, or provide news updates or sports scores. Two-way transmissions require both a transmitter and a receiver for sending and receiving signals. A device that functions as both a transmitter and a receiver is called a transceiver. Cellular radio telephones and two-way radios use transceivers, so that back-andforth communication between two people can be maintained. Early transceivers were very large, but they have decreased in size due to advances in technology. Fixed-base transceivers, such as those used at police stations, can fit on a desktop, and hand-held transceivers have shrunk in size as well. Several current models of handheld transceivers weigh less than 0.2 kg (0.5 lb). Some pagers also use transceivers to provide limited response options. These brief returncommunication opportunities allow paging users to acknowledge reception of a page and to respond using a limited menu of options.
13
1.
Infrared Wireless Transmission- "Transmission of data signals using infrared-light waves". These infrared-light waves are at a frequency too low for human eyes to receive and interpret. Infrared ports can be found in digital cameras, laptops, and printers as well as wireless mice.
2.
Broadcast Radio- a wireless transmission medium that sends data over long distances (regions, states, countries) at up to 2 megabits per second (AM/FM Radio)
3.
Microwave Radio- Transmission of voice and data through the atmosphere as super high-frequency radio waves called microwaves. These frequencies are used to transmit messages between ground-based stations and satellite communications systems.
4.
Communications Satellites- are microwave relay stations in orbit around the earth.
4.2Wireless networks: 1) Personal Area Network (PAN) 2) Local Area Network (LAN) 3) Wireless Area Network ( WAN) 4) Wireless Metropolitan Area Network ( WMAN)
14
Transmitter
Medium OR
Receiver
I/P signal
Channel
O/P signal
Noise
Fig: Block diagram of commn system In simple block diagram contains only transmitter, medium and receiver. This system can be easily affected by noise or external unwanted signal. An input signal is given to transmitter from where the input analog signal is converted into electrical signal using transducer. Now the transmitter transmits information signal to receiver via wired or wireless medium. The medium is nothing but a channel that used for exchange of data from one place to another place. While message is been passed through medium it may be interrupted by unwanted signal known as noise. Because of noise the size or width of information signal is increases due to which at the receiver end it makes confusion for data collection. At the receiver end there is opposite circuitry is used in transmitter. Here we get the original signal from electrical signal.
15
I/P signal
Transreceive r
Wireles s Mediu m
Transreceive r
O/P Signal
Noise (Natural)
Here in wireless communication system we uses trans-receivers at both sides along with transducer at input and output sides. Here the wireless media stands for either air or atmospheric layers like troposphere, ionosphere etc.
16
[Link] : Modulation is a process by which a signal is transformed into waveforms that are compatible with the characteristic of the channel, in terms of bandwidth support also. 7.1Bandwidth:It is a part of spectrum that is used for communication. Mathematically it can be Stated as follow: B.W. = Upper frequency - lower frequency 7.2Modulation system: It has two main types as follows: Analog and digital modulation system which are further divided as analog into Amplitude, Angle and Pulse modulation techniques. Where on other hand the digital modulation is divided into Pulse amplitude modulation, Pulse width modulation, Pulse phase modulation and Delta modulation.
17
France used a beauty contest to assign four 3G licenses. The national telecommunications regulator required firms to submit applications by the end of January 2001. These applications were then evaluated according to preset criteria and given a mark out of 500. Criteria included employment (worth up to 25 points), service offerings (up to 50 points) and speed of deployment (up to 100 points). Winning applicants faced a relatively high license fee set by the government. As a result, there were only two applicants. These firms received their licenses in June 2001, with the remaining two licenses unallocated (Penard, 2002). The concept of using a market mechanism to assign property rights over spectrum and to deal with issues such as interference goes back to at least the 1950s when it was canvassed
18
by Herzel (1951) and then by Coase (1959). But it was more than thirty years before spectrum auctions became common. New Zealand altered its laws to allow spectrum auctions in 1989 and in the early 1990s auctions were used to assign blocks of spectrum relating to mobile telephones, television, radio broadcasting and other smaller services to private management (Crandall, 1998). In August 1993, U.S. law was modified to allow the FCC to use auctions to assign radio spectrum licenses and by July 1996 the FCC had conducted seven auctions and assigned over 2,100 licenses (Moreton and Spiller, 1998). This included the assignment of two new 2G mobile
9
telephone licenses in each region of the U.S. through two auctions. In 2000, the U.K. auctioned off five 3G
Formally, the FCC spectrum auctions were for personal communications services (PCS). In addition to 2G mobile telephones, relevant services included two-way paging, portable fax machines and wireless computer networks. See McAfee and McMillan (1996) for an early appraisal of these auctions. Licenses for a total payment of approximately $34b. Auctions have involved a variety of formats including second price sealed bid in New Zealand, modified ascending bid in the U.S. and a mixed ascending bid and Dutch auction format in the U.K. Bidders may have to satisfy certain criteria, such as service guarantees and participation deposits, before they can participate in the auctions. Limits may also be placed on the number of licenses a single firm can win in a particular geographic area, so that the auction does not create a monopoly supplier. From an economic perspective, using an auction to assign spectrum helps ensure that the spectrum goes to the highest value user.
19
For a non-technical overview of the diffusion of mobile telephones in the EU, see Gruber (1999). Gruber and Verbovens analysis suggests that the move to 2G systems in
Europe led to a rapid increase in the diffusion of mobile technology. This diffusion effect was significantly greater than the acceleration effect built in to an S-shaped diffusion process. However, Gruber and Verboven do not isolate the cause of this acceleration. One explanation is standardization. 2G technology was introduced using the GSM standard across the EU, replacing a variety of incompatible analogue systems. Thus, the network effects associated with roaming may underlie the increased diffusion. Alternatively, as noted above, 2G mobile systems are significantly more efficient in terms of spectrum use than analogue systems. The capacity expansion associated with the introduction of 2G systems could lead to a drop in prices that encourages mobile take-up, regardless of the degree of competition. . competition hypothesis, they find that mobile demand is decreasing in price, although only the effect of monthly charges is statistically significant. Koski and Kretschmer (2002) do not consider catch up explicitly but do find that countries with a higher GDP per head adopted 2G technology earlier. This is consistent with Ahn and Lee (1999). Gruber and Verboven (2001a) also find that countries with higher income per capita tend to be more advanced in adopting mobile phones. (p.1204) Further, they consider convergence in terms of the level of a countries development and show that convergence in diffusion of mobile technology is much faster in rich countries than in poor countries. Thus, a late starter among poorer nations will take a lot longer to catch up with an early starter than would a comparable late starter among rich countries.
20
[Link]
21
mobile telephony reduces demand for fixed-line services. The availability of mobile services leads to approximately a ten percent decrease in the fixed-wire telephony.
11.1Costs A small number of papers have attempted to determine the presence of scale economies in mobile telephony. The results from these studies tend to be contradictory. While McKenzie and Small (1997) find that mobile telephony generally exhibits diseconomies of scale, and at best has constant returns to scale, Foreman and Beauvais (1999) find that mobile telephony exhibits modest increasing returns to scale. The disagreement between such cost studies is unsurprising. In fixed-line local telephony, the presence or absence of increasing returns to scale has been subject to heated debate for much of the last thirty years (e.g. see Shin and Ying, 1992). In local telephony, the debate has immediate regulatory implications regarding the presence or absence of a natural monopoly in the local loop. In contrast, for 2G mobile, robust competition has been shown to be viable in many
This section surveys the literature dealing with possible anticompetitive behaviour in wireless markets and the associated regulation of wireless services. The focus is on issues that are of potential concern to policy makers including potential barriers to wireless competition (arising from incomplete coverage, roaming, standards, and number portability), the possibility of tacit collusion, discriminatory on- and off-net pricing, and the regulation of access prices.
Given the success of wireless services, at least in terms of the spectacular growth in cellular subscriptions (see section 2.3 for details), it is perhaps surprising that a main focus for the economics literature on wireless has been on the limitations of wireless competition. To some extent this probably reflects the historical structure of the industry, which given the allocation of scarce spectrum often only allowed two networks to exist, for example in the U.S. and U.K.. A
23
natural question to ask is whether two networks are enough to ensure competitive conditions, a question we will address in section 5.1.1 which reviews the literature on tacit collusion in wireless markets. Section 2 introduced several other properties of the wireless market that might cause policymakers to be concerned about the likely levels of competition and prices. These included sunk costs, high switching costs (lock-in occurs through long-term contracts, a lack of phone portability and a lack of number portability), differentiation in coverage, and inconsistent standards. In section 5.1.2 we review the competition and regulatory aspects of these issues. We also review the literature relating to pricing in wireless markets, dealing with the possibility of discriminatory on- and off-net pricing and the high price of international roaming.
Broadly speaking, there are three different access prices that are of interest in wireless markets.
1. A call from a mobile operator to a fixed-line network (a mobile-to-fixed call) involves the mobile operator collecting all the revenue for the call, but the fixed-line network providing the termination of the call. As a result, the fixed-line network usually charges for the termination of mobile-to-fixed calls. Typically, the termination of mobile-to-fixed calls is treated in the same way as the termination of other calls to fixed-line networks, being regulated on a cost-basis.
2. A call from a fixed-line network to a mobile operator (a fixed-to-mobile call) often leads to an access price being set by the mobile operator. In the majority of markets, the termination of fixed-to-mobile calls has been priced many times higher than the termination of mobile-to-fixed calls, sometimes resulting in the regulation of fixed-to32
mobile termination prices. An exception is the U.S., where this access price is the same as the mobile-to-fixed access price due to the symmetry requirements under the 1996 Telecommunications Act. Other exceptions are Canada, Hong Kong and Singapore, where there are no fixed-to-mobile termination charges. Instead, like the U.S., mobile operators recover the cost of terminating fixed-to-mobile calls from the mobile callers directly (receiver pays).
24
3. A call from a mobile operator to another mobile operator (a mobile-to-mobile call) may involve mobile operators charging each other for termination. Such access prices are often negotiated privately between mobile operators.
In this section we will review the recent literature that has developed on fixed-tomobile termination, dealing with the related issues of caller versus receiver pays and mobile-tomobile interconnection as we go. The first paper to model the optimal pricing of fixed-to-mobile termination was that of Armstrong (1997). Armstrong noted the high price of fixed-to-mobile calls in the Mobile termination charges are regulated in the U.K using a price-cap approach, with the cap reducing towards estimates of long-run incremental cost over four years. In Australia the regulator ties year-on-year changes in mobile termination charges to changes in retail prices of mobile services.
25
earns a margin equal to this termination charge less its costs of terminating calls. Competition drives mobile operators to return this margin to its subscribers, which takes the form of a subsidy to consumers to connect to the network. Armstrong argues that high fixed-to-mobile termination charges can explain the handset subsidies so often observed in the wireless market. Assuming fixed-line operators obtain no margin on fixed-to-mobile calls, Armstrong shows the socially optimal fixed-to-mobile termination charge is equal to cost. This ensures fixed-to-mobile calls are priced at cost, which is the only source of a possible inefficiency in the model. Such cost-based termination of fixed-to-mobile calls eliminates any subsidy to mobile subscribers. Armstrong considers how optimal termination charges change when three Even back in 1997, these issues had already been dealt with by regulation in the U.S. The 1996 Telecommunications Act already required that fixed-to-mobile termination be priced at the same level as mobile-to-fixed termination, and fixed-to-mobile retail prices be regulated on the same In his model, mobile-to-mobile calls and mobile-to-fixed calls do not play any role in the analysis.
26
13.1Advantages : It overcome the distance and language barrier. Effective over wide area. It requires less maintenance. High speed. Time consuming. It provides better security. It can overcome the noisy effect.
13.2Disadvantage: It cant overcome on natural noise. Requires large bandwidth. It may damage electronic devices due to stronger electromagnetic waves.
27
[Link] systems Wireless technology may supplement or replace hard wired implementations in security systems for homes or office buildings. [Link] remote control Modern televisions use wireless (generally infrared) remote control units. Now radio waves are also used. [Link] telephone (phones and modems) Perhaps the best known example of wireless technology is the cellular telephone and modems. These instruments use radio waves to enable the operator to make phone calls from many locations worldwide. They can be used anywhere that there is a cellular telephone site to house the equipment that is required to transmit and receive the signal that is used to transfer both voice and data to and from these instruments. [Link]-Fi Wi-Fi is a wireless local area network that enables portable computing devices to connect easily to the Internet. Standardized as IEEE 802.11 a,b,g,n, Wi-Fi approaches speeds of some types of wired Ethernet. Wi-Fi hot spots have been popular over the past few years. Some businesses charge customers a monthly fee for service, while others have begun offering it for free in an effort to increase the sales of their goods. [Link] energy transfer Wireless energy transfer is a process whereby electrical energy is transmitted from a power source to an electrical load that does not have a built-in power source, without the use of interconnecting wires.
28
[Link] Interface Devices Answering the call of customers frustrated with cord clutter, many manufactures of computer peripherals turned to wireless technology to satisfy their consumer base. Originally these units used bulky, highly limited transceivers to mediate between a computer and a keyboard and mouse, however more recent generations have used small, high quality devices, some even incorporating Bluetooth. These systems have become so ubiquitous that some users have begun complaining about a lack of wired [Link] devices tend to have a slightly slower response time than their wired counterparts, however the gap is decreasing. Initial concerns about the security of wireless keyboards have also been addressed with the maturation of the technology. Many scientists have complained that wireless technology interferes with their experiments, forcing them to use less optimal peripherals because the optimum one is not available in a wired [Link] has become especially prevalent among scientists who use trackballs as the number of models in production steadily decreases.
29
30