0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views7 pages

Physics of Quadcopter Flight Explained

This document analyzes the simple physics behind how a quadcopter drone flies using data from sensors on a smartphone attached to the drone. It summarizes that: 1) The drone's vertical flight is achieved through varying the thrust of its four vertical propellers, with upward thrust exceeding gravity during ascent and vice versa for descent. 2) Data from the smartphone's accelerometer during takeoff and landing matches expectations from Newton's laws, showing upward then downward acceleration. 3) Yaw rotation is achieved by increasing power to diagonal pairs of propellers to generate torque for rotation about the vertical axis.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views7 pages

Physics of Quadcopter Flight Explained

This document analyzes the simple physics behind how a quadcopter drone flies using data from sensors on a smartphone attached to the drone. It summarizes that: 1) The drone's vertical flight is achieved through varying the thrust of its four vertical propellers, with upward thrust exceeding gravity during ascent and vice versa for descent. 2) Data from the smartphone's accelerometer during takeoff and landing matches expectations from Newton's laws, showing upward then downward acceleration. 3) Yaw rotation is achieved by increasing power to diagonal pairs of propellers to generate torque for rotation about the vertical axis.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Simple physics behind the flight of a drone

Martı́n Monteiro1,2 , Cecilia Stari2 , Cecilia Cabeza2 , Arturo C.


arXiv:1511.05916v3 [[Link]-ph] 8 Nov 2021

Martı́2
1
Universidad ORT Uruguay
2
Instituto de Fı́sica, Universidad de la República, Uruguay
E-mail: marti@[Link]

Abstract. The flight of a quadcopter drone, readily available as a toy, is analyzed


using simple physics concepts. A smartphone with built-in accelerometer and
gyroscope was attached to the drone to register the accelerations and angular velocities
along the three spatial axis while the drone is taking off, landing or rotating. The
vertical speed, the height and one of the angular coordinates are obtained through
numerical integration of the acceleration values and compared with information
provided by the manufacturer. The analysis of these quantities provides an opportunity
to gain insight into important physics concepts involving Newton laws and conservation
principles in a stimulating environment.
Simple physics behind the flight of a drone 2

1. Drones and Physics

Remotely-controlled helicopters and planes have been available as toys for decades.
However, only recently, advances in sensor technologies have made possible to easily
fly and control theses devices at an affordable price [1]. Along with their increasing
availability the educational opportunities are also proliferating [2, 3]. In a previous
experiment we measured the height and pressure in the inner layer of the atmosphere
using a smartphone mounted on a drone. These kinds of measurements can be compared
with approximate models as an isothermal or a constant density atmosphere and also
with the International Standard Atmosphere [4]. Here, a simple experiment in which
a smartphone was mounted on a drone is described, which investigates the basics of
flight. Thanks to the smartphone’s built-in accelerometer and gyroscope, the linear and
rotational kinematics of the aircraft in take-off, landing and yaw can be analysed. To
get a deeper insight, the acceleration values were numerically integrated using a simple
scheme to obtain the vertical speed and height. The measured maximum value of the
vertical speed can be compared with the manufacturer’s specifications.

2. The outdoor experiment

A smartphone, model LG G2, was mounted on a radio-controlled a DJI Phantom


2 quadcopter using an armband case as shown in Fig. 1. Several simple flights
were accomplished consisting of ascents and descents with constant speed or constant
acceleration and different trajectories at constant height (circles, “U” or “S” shaped).
During these flights, the smartphone’s sensors recorded the acceleration and the angular
velocity using the Androsensor application. In practice, after several minutes of
collecting data, it was difficult to discern which portion of the graph corresponds to a
particular manoeuvre. To avoid this problem a video camera, or a second smartphone,
was used from the ground to record alternatively the flight and the operation of the
remote control. In what follows, we focus on some of the records of the sensors and
analyse the acceleration and angular velocity along the vertical axis.

3. The drone’s flight

The drone’s flight is based on the rotation of four vertical axis propellers (rotors)
arranged in the corners of a square. As a result of the Newton’s second law, when
the drone is hovering at constant altitude the upwards thrust generated by the rotors
equals the downward gravitational force on the airframe. A vertical acceleration or
deceleration is obtained thanks to an increase or decrease of the total power of the
rotors. If the thrust force is upwards and exceeds the force of gravity, then the drone
will initially accelerate, however, in doing so its potential energy increases, and the
motors have to do work to supply that energy. So, the rate of rise will be limited to the
rate at which the motors can deliver this energy.
Simple physics behind the flight of a drone 3

Figure 1. Smartphone mounted on DJI Phantom 2 using an armband.

The vertical acceleration as a function of time is shown in Fig. 2. Initially the drone
is turned off on the ground. After a few seconds, the vehicle is switched on and the
propellers start to spin. The vibrations induced by the propellers are clearly detected
by the accelerometer. Then, the drone takes off as revealed by an upward acceleration.
It is also worth mentioning that the vertical acceleration does not reach its maximum
value inmediatly but it takes an interval of about 1 s before that. After an interval of
deceleration, the drone is kept hovering for a few seconds. Note that the acceleration
values registered by the sensors are not centered about 0 but about 10 m/s2 . In the
accelerometer essentially the force required to hold a mass in a fixed position relative
to the smartphone is being registered. In accordance with Newton’s second law this
force is proportional to the acceleration. At the same time, quite independently, the
mass is being acted on by a completely different force of 10 N/kg downwards due to the
mutual gravitational attraction of the mass in the instrument and the mass of the Earth.
Because the gravity force per unit mass cannot be distinguished from the acceleration
force in this instrument (or indeed by anyone blindfolded in an aircraft), it appears
as a fictitious acceleration (of 10 m/s2 , which is exactly the same thing as 10 N/kg)
in the direction away from the centre of the Earth. This fictitious acceleration also
appears in other smartphone experiments as the physical pendulum [5, 6]. It is also
worth noting that the registered vertical acceleration is greater than 10 m/s2 at the
take off. Nevertheless, a few seconds later when the device decelerate it is lesser than
10 m/s2 .
The landing and a subsequent take off of the drone is analyzed in Fig. 3. During the
first stage the device is accelerating downward, then the acceleration registered is less
than 10 m/s2 . To avoid an abrupt landing, the drone is kept hovering close to the ground
and smoothly landed at t = 174 s. After about 20 s a new take off is accomplished.
As a consequence of the stabilization mechanism of the drone when it is ascending or
descending at constant speed or hovering the acceleration measurements are very noisy
and special care should be taken to numerically integrate the acceleration to obtain
the velocity or the altitude [7]. The origin of the noise can be associated to several
Simple physics behind the flight of a drone 4

Figure 2. Record of the acceleration sensor (top) and force (bottom) during the
take-off. In all the cases the sampling frequency is set to 20 samples per second.

sources. On the one hand, there are internal contributions from the motors evidenced
in the increase of the noise at the starting time indicated in the figure. On the other
hand, when the drone takes off its stabilization system responds to the atmospheric
conditions leading to an additional rise in the vibrations registered by the smartphone
acceleromenter.

Figure 3. Vertical acceleration during a landing and a subsequent take off.


Simple physics behind the flight of a drone 5

Generally speaking, the design of a drone is based on the rotational dynamics of the
rotors and involves subtle aspects. When the rotation axis is parallel to the spin axis,
torque is generated in the airframe by various effects, in particular, due to rotational
inertia and also as a reaction to the force needed to overcome the air resistance and to
push it downwards. The ability to deliver power to each rotor indenpendently provides
the possibility to control the drone. As a consequence of the conservation of angular
momentum, to maintain the angular velocity of the device, the sum of the torques
generated by the four rotors must be zero. If it is not the case, the device will undergo
accelerating vertical-axis rotation. In particular, yaw (rotation about the vertical axis of
the machine) is obtained increasing the power in one pair of diagonally opposite rotors
and decreasing the power in the other pair to maintain constant lift. The horizontal flight
is based on a similar mechanism. To fly forward or backward a horizontal component
of thrust is achieved by increasing the rotation rate of two adyacent rotors (the rear
ones) and a decreasing of the other two (the front ones). In this situation, the greater
force in the back leads the drone to tilt forward, resulting in the thrust force having a
horizontal component.
The results obtained by the rotation sensor are depicted in Fig. 4. Yaw, both
clockwise and counter-clockwise (see from above), is easily distinguished in the vertical
component of the angular velocity. The maximum values attained by the angular
velocity can be compared with that provided by the manufacturer. In our model the
technical specification indicates 200◦ /s ∼ 3.49 rad/s which agrees very well the maximum
values observed in the figure.

4. Vertial speed, heigth and angle

Using the vertical component of the acceleration it is possible to integrate numerically


these value to obtain, firstly, the vertical speed, and, then, the height as shown in Fig. 5.
This procedure is similar to those proposed in other contexts [5, 8, 9]. As the drone
speed control was set at maximum during a time interval the vertical speed attained was
the maximum possible for this device model. In our case, the maximum ascent speed
reported by the manufacturer was 6 m/s which agrees very well with that obtained
numerically as it can be seen in the figure. In case of having a large and clear space it
is also possible to supplement these results with video analysis [10].
Another exercise consists in numerically integrating the vertical angular velocity to
obtain the rotation angle in a horizontal plane. The numerical result is shown in Fig. 4
(bottom). Notice that this can be easily done when the rotation is uniaxial, however,
when the drone is rotating along two or three axis this task is very difficult.

5. Conclusion

This experiment, which can be easily replicated in a school yard, provides an interesting
opportunity to understand basic concepts in aerodynamics by using the smartphone’s
Simple physics behind the flight of a drone 6

Figure 4. Angular velocity (vertical component) recorded by the gyroscope (top


panel). Angle of rotation in a horizontal plane obtained by the numerical integration
of the vertical angular velocity or yaw (bottom panel).

sensors and analyzing their results. The relationships between various kinematic
quantities, such as the acceleration, velocity, displacement, angular velocity, and angle,
can be further investigated using numerical methods. With this simple experiment we
exploit the educational capabilities provided by two expanding technologies: drones and
smartphones.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge financial support from grant Fisica Nolineal (ID 722) Programa Grupos
I + D CSIC 2018 (UdelaR, Uruguay) and PEDECIBA (UdelaR, MEC, Uruguay). We
thank the anonymous reviewer for his/her critical reading and valuble suggestions.
Simple physics behind the flight of a drone 7

Figure 5. (top panel) Vertical acceleration (after correction for gravitational force
per unit mass), (bottom left) vertical component of velocity, (bottom right) vertical
displacement obtained by numerical integration of the sensor data.

References

[1] Floreano D and Wood R J 2015 Nature 521 460–466


[2] Obaid M S and Mebayet S O 2021 Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1818 012104 URL
[Link]
[3] Saifizi M, Syahirah N, Mustafa W A, Rahim H A and Nasrudin M W 2021 Using unmanned
aerial vehicle in 3d modelling of uniciti campus to estimate building size Journal of Physics:
Conference Series vol 1962 (IOP Publishing) p 012057
[4] Monteiro M, Vogt P, Stari C, Cabeza C and Marti A C 2016 The Physics Teacher 54 308–309
[5] Monteiro M, Cabeza C and Martı́ A C 2014 European Journal of Physics 35 045013
[6] Monteiro M, Cabeza C and Marti A C 2015 Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Fı́sica 37 1303 – ISSN
1806-1117
[7] Monteiro M and Marti A C 2017 Physics Education 52 015010
[8] Vogt P and Kuhn J 2014 The Physics Teacher 52 118–119
[9] Monteiro M, Stari C, Cabeza C and Marti A C 2017 The Physics Teacher 55 580–581
[10] Monteiro M, Cabeza C, Stari C and Marti A C 2021 Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1929
012038 URL [Link]

Common questions

Powered by AI

In a quadcopter, vertical movement is controlled by adjusting the total power of all rotors. Increasing rotor power results in upward thrust exceeding the gravitational pull, causing vertical acceleration, whereas decreasing rotor power causes a reduction in thrust, leading to downward deceleration. Horizontal movement is achieved by creating a tilt in the drone's orientation. For example, increasing the power of the rear rotors while decreasing the power of the front rotors causes the drone to tilt forward. This tilt translates some of the thrust into a horizontal component, propelling the drone forward. Thus, the control of rotor power allows for precise maneuvering along both the vertical and horizontal axes .

Built-in smartphone sensors, such as accelerometers and gyroscopes, provide valuable data that enhances the educational impact of drone experiments. They allow students to apply physics concepts in a practical setting, such as analyzing motion through recorded acceleration and angular velocity. By numerically integrating these measurements, students can derive kinematic quantities like speed, displacement, and angle changes, deepening their understanding of motion principles, Newton's laws, and conservation principles. These sensors offer a hands-on experience that bridges theoretical learning with real-world applications, making abstract physics concepts more tangible and engaging .

The dynamics of a drone's rotors and its flight stability demonstrate several physics principles, including rotational inertia, torque, and conservation of angular momentum. Each rotor exerts a force necessary to overcome air resistance and gravitational pull, generating a torque. For a stable flight, the combined torques from the four rotors must cancel each other out to prevent uncontrolled spinning or tilting. The conservation of angular momentum allows for stabilization during uniaxial rotations like yaw, where power adjustments between diagonally opposite rotors enable controlled rotational movements. This illustrates the precise balancing of dynamic forces required to maintain stability during flight .

Numerical integration is crucial in interpreting raw accelerometer data obtained from a drone's flight. By integrating the vertical component of acceleration data, researchers can calculate the vertical speed and subsequently the altitude of the drone over time. Additionally, integrating the angular velocity data allows for determining rotation angles, giving insight into the drone's orientation changes such as yaw. These calculations transform raw sensor data into meaningful information about the drone’s dynamic behavior under various flight conditions, enabling assessment against manufacturer specifications or theoretical models .

The sum of torques generated by the four rotors of a drone must equal zero to prevent unwanted rotational movement and ensure stability. If this condition is met, the drone maintains a stable altitude and orientation. If the balance is disrupted, and the torques do not sum to zero, the drone will experience an uncontrolled rotation or yaw around its vertical axis, disrupting stability. This principle is crucial to maintaining steady flight as any imbalance requires corrective input, leading to energy inefficiencies and potential loss of control .

Analyzing accelerometer data from a quadcopter presents several challenges, primarily due to noise from motor vibrations and the drone's stabilization system responding to atmospheric conditions. Such noise complicates the numerical integration of sensor data to derive accurate velocity and altitude measures. To mitigate these challenges, careful data filtering and calibration of instruments are necessary. Utilizing additional video recordings or supplementary sensors can provide cross-verification for the integrated results, thereby ensuring higher accuracy and reliability in post-flight data analysis .

A drone's flight experiment can reveal atmospheric conditions through its stabilization responses and sensor data patterns. As the drone's onboard sensors record fluctuations in acceleration and orientation, deviations in data might indicate external atmospheric disturbances like wind gusts or temperature gradients. These conditions affect the drone's stability, causing it to adjust rotor speeds and torque balance continually. By analyzing these sensor variations, insights into prevailing atmospheric influences can be gained, enhancing understanding of environmental interactions with flight stability, similar to principles seen in larger aircraft but on a more manageable scale .

Newton's second law is fundamental in understanding the forces acting on a quadcopter drone during hovering. When a drone hovers at a constant altitude, the upward thrust generated by its rotors equals the downward gravitational force acting on the airframe. According to Newton's second law, the acceleration of an object is dependent on the net force acting upon it and inversely proportional to its mass. For a drone to maintain a constant hover, the upward force (thrust) and the downward force (gravity) must be balanced. The moment there is an imbalance, such as an increase in rotor power resulting in a thrust greater than gravity, the drone will experience upward acceleration. This illustrates how the law helps in understanding the thrust-gravity balance necessary for a stable hover .

Using drones equipped with smartphones aligns with experiential learning paradigms by allowing students to directly observe and analyze physical phenomena, embodying the principle of learning through experience. As students engage in flying drones and interpreting sensor data, they apply theoretical knowledge of kinematics, dynamics, and rotational physics in a practical context. Such active participation in experimentation not only reinforces academic understanding but also fosters critical thinking and problem-solving skills, key components of experiential learning. This hands-on approach enhances engagement and interest in physics by demonstrating real-world applications of abstract concepts .

Gravity significantly impacts accelerometer readings by manifesting as a constant force that cannot be distinguished from other forces in the sensor data. This results in a 'fictitious' acceleration equivalent to 10 m/s² that appears in the data even when the drone is stationary relative to the ground. To effectively analyze sensor data, this gravitational influence is corrected to isolate the net acceleration caused by actual motor thrust and dynamic flight maneuvers. This correction is vital for accurate calculation of true motion parameters like speed and displacement .

You might also like