0% found this document useful (0 votes)
80 views3 pages

Role of States in International Relations

The document discusses the role of sovereign states in international relations. It outlines that the world is organized into over 185 sovereign states, which are the central actors and units of analysis in international relations. Sovereignty and a defined territory are key attributes of a state. The modern state system emerged in the 17th century with the Treaty of Westphalia, which established principles of state sovereignty and non-interference. However, the state system has declined somewhat due to factors like globalization, the rise of international organizations, and the spread of transnational issues.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
80 views3 pages

Role of States in International Relations

The document discusses the role of sovereign states in international relations. It outlines that the world is organized into over 185 sovereign states, which are the central actors and units of analysis in international relations. Sovereignty and a defined territory are key attributes of a state. The modern state system emerged in the 17th century with the Treaty of Westphalia, which established principles of state sovereignty and non-interference. However, the state system has declined somewhat due to factors like globalization, the rise of international organizations, and the spread of transnational issues.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

SUBJECT: POLITICAL SCIENCE III

COURSE: BA LLB SEMESTER III


TEACHER: MS. DEEPIKA GAHATRAJ
MODULE: MODULE II, ACTORS IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Topic:
Role of Sovereign States in International Relations

ROLE OF SOVEREIGN STATES IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS


The world community is organized into over 185 sovereign states. The organization of
humankind into sovereign states is now called the state system. Palmer and Perkins
define .what is variously described as Western State System, the nation-state system or
(sovereign) state system as: "It is the pattern of political life in which people are separately
organized into sovereign states that must manage to get along together." Sovereignty and a
definite territory are two of the essential attributes of a state. Of course, there should always
be, as Garner said, a community of persons, having an organized government. Each state
acquires coercive power to ensure compliance. The state system has evolved during the last
three and a half centuries. It is the dominant pattern today. International Relations, infact,
are relations and interactions among the states who constitute the state-system.
The state is central to the study of international relations and likely to remain so into the
foreseeable future. State policy is the most common object of analysis. States decide to go
to war. They erect trade barriers. They choose whether and at what level to establish
environmental standards. States enter international agreements, or not, and choose whether
to abide by their provisions. Even scholars who give prominence to non-state actors are
typically concerned with understanding or changing state practice (for example, Keck and
Sikkink 1998). International relations as a discipline is chiefly concerned with what states
do and, in turn, how their actions affect other states.
Similarly, states are a common unit of analysis in theories of international relations. Many
analysts focus on states and their interactions to explain observed patterns of world politics.
The state is fundamental to neorealism (Waltz 1979) and neoliberal institutionalism
(Keohane 1984). It is also key in many constructivist and English school theories (Bull
1977, Reus-Smit 1999, Wendt 1999). Even critical, post- modern, or feminist theories,
which have arisen in opposition to existing forms of social power, often focus on
problematizing states and state practice.
Both as objects and units of analysis, international relations is largely about states and their
interactions.
Features of the State System

1
Certain features of the state system are essential conditions, without which the state system
cannot exist. These features have been described by Palmer and Perkins as corollaries. They
are the concepts of nationalism, sovereignty and power. Nationalism is that psychological or
spiritual quality which unites the people of a state and " gives them the will to champion
what they regard as their national interest." Sovereignty is the concept of unlimited powers.
A group of people who are territorially organized are called sovereign when they possess
both internal and external freedom to do what they wish to do. National power is the might
of a state which enables the state to get things done as it would like them to be done. Power
is a complex of many tangible and intangible elements.
In every modern state, such as India, Britain, Russia, the United States, Pakistan or Egypt,
there live a community of numerous persons who possess a government which is generally
obeyed by the people and which does not obey any external authority. Such a state is
situated within a definite territory.
Sovereignty, in simple terms, means the supreme power of the state both internally and
externally. It is the attribute of sovereignty which distinguishes the state from other
associations or organisations.
One of the earliest definitions of sovereignty was given by the French philosopher Jean
Bodin (1530-1596),who defined it as "supreme power over citizens and subjects,
unrestrained by law." However, Bodin's main object was to strengthen the position of the
French Monarch who was then facing civil war and chaos.
Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), elaborated on the concept of sovereignty, shifting the
emphasis from the person of the king to the abstraction called government or state. Hobbes
equated the sovereign with the state and government.
A useful distinction is made between internal and external sovereignty. Internal sovereignty
concerns the supreme and lawful authority of the state over its citizens. External
sovereignty, on the other hand, refers to the recognition by all states, of the independence,
territorial integrity and inviolability of each state, as represented by its government. Hugo
Grotius, (1583 -1645),the Dutch jurist defined sovereignty as "that power whose acts are not
subject to the control of another." For him, sovereignty was manifested when a state, in
dealing with its internal affairs, remained free from the control of other states. Thus defined,
sovereignty has become the cornerstone of the modern international system. It is this
external sovereignty that we are concerned with here.
This concept of sovereignty was for the first time recognised and institutionalized in the
Treaty of Westphalia in 1648. It provided that : (i) only sovereign states could engage in
international relations; (ii) for the purpose of recognizing a state as an actor in international
relations, it must have a geographical territory with a definite population, land and effective
military power to fulfil international obligations; and (iii) all sovereign states are equal in

2
international law and international relations.

Decline of modern State System


In the opinion of CAW Manning, the western state system determined at the Treaty of
Westphalia still continues to be the same. Even today the modern states are associated with
3 characteristics. But his view is not completely correct because modern state system has
completely changed. The concept of sovereignty has changed a lot. Sovereignty does not
exist in its ancient form of royal absolutism. Scientific and technological advancement has
completely changed the impermeability and territoriality of the states. Modern sophisticated
weapons has completely changed the warfare. Ideology began to play an important role in
International Politics. After the Second World War many states made alliances with
powerful states. Super-national Institutions like NATO, SEATO, CENTO etc. are the result
of this. As a result International Politics is not an inter action between two or more groups of
sovereign states. Hence we can say that there is a decline of the nation state system. That is
why the term ‘International System’ is used in place of national system.

REFERNCES:
- Lake David A., The State and International Relations
- Huntington Samuel P. ( 1973), Transnational Organizations in World Politics, World
Politics, Vol. 25, No. 3, p. 333-368
- [Link]
- [Link]
- [Link]

Common questions

Powered by AI

International agreements influence the policy decisions of sovereign states by establishing legal and normative frameworks that guide state behavior in areas such as trade, environmental standards, and human rights. Compliance with these agreements is often incentivized through shared benefits, such as access to markets or coordinated responses to global threats. States enter such agreements to enhance security and development, effectively aligning national policies with international standards. This mutual dependence can lead to shifts in domestic policy to meet international norms and obligations, thus integrating global cooperation into national strategies .

While states remain central to the study of international relations, scholars recognize the increasing influence of non-state actors such as multinational corporations, international organizations, and non-governmental organizations. These actors play critical roles in shaping policies, norms, and outcomes in international politics. Scholars like Keck and Sikkink focus on understanding state practice influenced by these actors, suggesting a complex interplay where non-state actors can pressure states to change practices through advocacy, lobbying, and transnational networks, thereby affecting international relations alongside traditional state-centric approaches .

The Treaty of Westphalia, signed in 1648, was significant for establishing the concept of state sovereignty, which became the cornerstone of the modern international system. It institutionalized the ideas that only sovereign states could engage in international relations, recognized the importance of territorial integrity, and established principles of equality among sovereign states in international law. This laid the foundation for the modern state system by formalizing the structure of international relations based on sovereign entities .

Sovereignty is considered a cornerstone of the modern international system because it defines the legal and political independence of states, allowing them to govern without external interference. This principle of sovereignty underlies international law and relations, as it ensures that each state respects the territorial integrity and autonomy of others. The mutual recognition of sovereignty creates a structured environment for diplomatic interactions, negotiations, and the peaceful resolution of conflicts among states .

Transnational organizations and alliances challenge the traditional concept of sovereignty by requiring states to cooperate and often cede some level of authority to supranational bodies. This can dilute a state's absolute control over its affairs, as seen in the operations of entities like the European Union or NATO, where member states commit to binding agreements that may override national legislation. Moreover, these entities promote integrative approaches to global problems, reconfiguring the power and autonomy traditionally held by states within a purely national framework .

The traditional concept of sovereignty, originally characterized by royal absolutism, has evolved significantly. In the modern context, sovereignty has adapted due to scientific and technological advancements, which have altered the territoriality and impermeability of states. Moreover, modern states form alliances and engage in supranational institutions like NATO, indicating a decline of the nation-state system. This shift reflects a move from strictly national systems to more complex international systems where sovereignty is less about absolute control and more about cooperation and shared global governance .

Constructivist theories in international relations focus on the social and ideational aspects of international politics, emphasizing the role of state identities, norms, and social structures. In contrast, neorealism primarily considers states as rational actors seeking power and security in an anarchic international system. Constructivists argue that state behavior is not only motivated by material interests but also shaped by social interactions and shared ideas among states. Thus, they focus more on changing state practices to understand international relations rather than the fixed nature of state interactions emphasized by neorealism .

Post-World War II, ideologies and technological advancements have significantly reshaped international relations. Ideologies played a critical role by influencing alliances and rivalries during the Cold War and beyond. At the same time, technological advancements, such as sophisticated weaponry, have transformed warfare, reducing the physical barriers previously separating sovereign states. The evolution of supranational institutions also reflects how states interact within a more integrated international system rather than purely bilateral relations among sovereign entities .

The decline of traditional nation-state sovereignty affects international politics by shifting power dynamics toward more integrated systems and supranational organizations. This shift facilitates multilateral cooperation in tackling global challenges such as climate change, security, and trade. However, it also raises issues of national autonomy and the effectiveness of international governance structures. States more frequently cede parts of their sovereignty to participate in international treaties and organizations, which can reduce unilateral decision-making power but enhance global stability and cooperation .

A sovereign state is defined by certain key features, including a definite territory, a permanent population, and a government that exercises coercive power and is not subject to any external authority. Sovereignty grants the state both internal and external independence, allowing it to manage its affairs without external interference. This includes the power to make decisions regarding war, trade, environmental standards, and international agreements .

You might also like