DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF

BRIDGE UNDER PMGSY-III YEAR 2021-2022

JHARKHAND STATE RURAL ROAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

(JSRRDA)

Name of Bridge
Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to
Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

State : Jharkhand Package No.

District : Bokaro JH01BOKMARS121
Block : Petarwar

Length Of Bridge : 77.48 M

Length Of Approch : 60.00 M

Total Cost of Project : 411.45 Lakh

Cost of Bridge Per M : 5.310 Lakh
5 Year Maintenance Cost : 2.283 Lakh

Prepared By:
MaRS Planning And Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd
Address: House No C/287, Yash Padam, Main Road, Ashok Nagar, Besides Hill Top Motors (Maruti
Showroom, Jharkhand 834002
MOB.:- 7488839407 , 7781011178
 Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via
Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Executive Summary: .......................................................... 3
1.1. Name of Work: ........................................................................................................................... 3
1.2. Scope of Present Work: ............................................................................................................ 3
1.3. Location of Bridge Site: ............................................................................................................. 3
1.4. Advantage of this Bridge: ......................................................................................................... 3
1.5. Salient Feature of the Project: ................................................................................................. 3
2. Methodology: .................................................................. 4
2.1. Reconnaissance Survey: .......................................................................................................... 4
2.2. Topography Survey: .................................................................................................................. 4
2.3. Determination of Length of Bridge: ......................................................................................... 4
2.4. Width of Carriageway: ............................................................................................................... 4
2.5. Finalisation of Span Arrangement: .......................................................................................... 4
2.6. Vertical clearance above HFL:................................................................................................. 5
2.7. Determination of Hydrological Parameters: ........................................................................... 5
2.8. Catchment Area: ........................................................................................................................ 5
2.9. Determination of HFL: ............................................................................................................... 5
2.10. Determination of Afflux: ............................................................................................................ 5
2.11. Determination of Linear Waterway:......................................................................................... 6
2.12. Design Discharge: ..................................................................................................................... 6
2.13. Discharge by Rational Method – ............................................................................................. 6
2.14. Discharge by Empirical Method – ........................................................................................... 6
2.15. Discharge by Manning’s Formula - ......................................................................................... 6
2.16. Rugosity Co-efficient ................................................................................................................. 7
3. Sub Soil Investigation: ........................................................ 7
3.1. Field Work (Boring/Drilling) at site. ......................................................................................... 7
3.2. Laboratory Testing:.................................................................................................................... 8
3.3. Interpretation and Recommendation: ..................................................................................... 8
4. Structure Design Methodology: .............................................. 8
4.1. Selection of Type of Foundation:............................................................................................. 8
4.2. Sub-structure: ............................................................................................................................. 8
4.3. Determination of Type of Piers: ............................................................................................... 8
4.4. Superstructure:........................................................................................................................... 8
4.5. Expansion Joints: ....................................................................................................................... 9
4.6. Bearing : ...................................................................................................................................... 9

1
 Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via
Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

5. Approach Road Methodology: ................................................ 9

5.1. Height of Approach Road in the vicinity of bridge:................................................................ 9
5.2. Requirement of Curve Design for Approach Road ............................................................. 10
5.3. Design Speed ........................................................................................................................... 10
5.4. Permissible Gradient ............................................................................................................... 10
5.5. Grade Compensation .............................................................................................................. 10
5.6. Extra Widening at Curve ......................................................................................................... 11
5.7. Camber ...................................................................................................................................... 11
5.8. Horizontal Curve ...................................................................................................................... 11
5.9. Superelevation ......................................................................................................................... 12
5.10. Vertical Curve ........................................................................................................................... 13
5.11. Minimum length of approach where no curve is provided ................................................. 14
6. River Training Protection Work Methodology ............................... 14
6.1. Approach Road Protection ..................................................................................................... 14
6.2. Approach Embankments subjected to flooding but where the velocity of flow is
insignificant (not exceeding 1 m/s) to cause Erosion. ........................................................ 14
6.3. Approach Embankments which are under direct and frontal attack of river flow or
otherwise subjected to velocity of flow exceeding 1 m/s. .................................................. 14
6.4. Approaches to bridges located in the bed of meandering rivers with large khadir width
requiring guide bunds. ............................................................................................................ 14
6.5. Design criteria as per para 5.3 of IRC89-1997 are as follows .......................................... 14
6.5.1 Side Slope ............................................................................................................................. 14
6.5.2 Slope Protection ................................................................................................................... 15
6.5.3 Pitching on the river side slope .......................................................................................... 15
6.5.4 Thickness of Pitching .......................................................................................................... 15
6.5.5 Shape of Stones .................................................................................................................. 15
6.5.6 Placing of Stones ................................................................................................................. 15
6.5.7 Filter Design.......................................................................................................................... 15
6.5.8 Toe Protection ...................................................................................................................... 16
7. Preparation of General Arrangement of Drawing: .......................... 16
8. Preparation of Detailed Design and Drawing: ............................... 16
9. Preparation of Bills of Quantities and Quantity Estimation: ................ 16

2
Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via
Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

1. Executive Summary:

1.1. Name of Work:

Construction of HL Bridge on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-
9800 Mtr.,Peterwar Block, Bokaro District.
1.2. Scope of Present Work:
To prepare Detailed Design of bridge including its approach road, Drawings, Quantity Estimation and
BOQ based upon topography survey and sub soil investigation of bridge site.
1.3. Location of Bridge Site:
The Latitude of the site is 23°40'28.86"N and Longitude is 85°46'40.19"E. (This has been taken using
GPS)
1.4. Advantage of this Bridge:
There are around 8 villages benefitted from this Road with Bridge and its population is approx 6365
Merudaru Chirwabeda, osam , Khairajara etc. Villages are located along alignment of Bridge .

Habitation count As per Gio Sadak and PMGSY OMMAS Site

Sr.N Name of habitation Population
1 Merudaru 1516
2 Koh 1318
3 Rajwartola 265

4 Osam 494
5 Katam kulhi 1446

6 Dhamona 174
7 Chirwabeda 604

8 Khaira Jara 548

Total 6365

1.5. Salient Feature of the Project:

Sl. Item of Works Description

No
1 Bridge Length : 77.48 F/F of dirt wall
2 Span Arrangement : 4x 19.36 m c/c of Exp. Gap
3 Type of Superstructure : RCC T-Beam & Slab Type without
Footpath
4 Angle of skew 0 (Degree)
5 Type of Foundation : Open Type
6 Type of Pier : RCC

7 Type of Abutment :
RCC Wall Type
8 Bridge Formation Level at centre :
RL 102.897 m
9 Lowest Bed Level :
RL 96.54 m
10 HFL :
RL 99.258 m
11 Design Speed :
40 KMPH
12 Minimum Radius of Horizontal Curve :
30m
13 Maximum Longitudinal Gradient :
5.0%
14 Carriageway Width :
7.5m for bridge
4.1 m for approach road
27 Grand Total of Bridge Cost inclusive of Consultancy : Rs. 33083183.38
Fee, Labour Cess and Carriage of Materials.

3
Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via
Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

2. Methodology:
The methodology adopted for preparation of Detailed Design and Drawing has been discussed here
for making the Design and Drawing illustrative:

2.1. Reconnaissance Survey:

The team of engineers and the officials that visited the site, carried out reconnaissance survey to know all
the relevant information regarding the following:
➢ Name of river
➢ Direction of Flow
➢ Whether the river is meandering or straight at the proposed bridge site
➢ Availability of land for construction of approach road
➢ Existence of other bridge in the vicinity of the proposed bridge
➢ Width of river from bank to bank
➢ Height of water during High Flood above Lowest Bed
➢ Nature of Bed Material near abutment
➢ Nature of Bed Material in the river bed
➢ Length of approach road required
➢ Type of protection work required
➢ Name of villages in the vicinity of proposed bridge

2.2. Topography Survey:

Topography surveys were conducted using Total Station. Normally three cross sections (One at proposed
bridge site, 2nd at upstream and 3rd at downstream) and Longitudinal Section along deepest mid channel
are taken. A site plan showing all the relevant details of the bridge site including approach road is also taken
using the Total Station. One temporary Bench Mark was fixed and written on permanent structure near the
proposed bridge site in paint and is shown in Site Plan, having Co-ordinate given as 23°40'29.09"N
85°46'40.32"E Elevation =265.00 Google [Link] field data were plotted using various softwares like
AutoCAD, Auto Plotter etc. The Latitude and Longitude of the bridge site has been taken using GPS.
The topography survey data has been enclosed as Annexure-I.

2.3. Determination of Length of Bridge:

Normally, the length of bridge is determined as the width of river at normal flow and in consideration of the
theoretical computed linear water way. In this case, the width of crossing considering normal flow is 96.838
m, while the width of crossing at HFL is only 99.258 m and the theoretical computed linear waterway is 130.0
m.
Thus, the length of bridge is to kept between 150 m to 270.00m In order to make the proposed bridge a
economical option, the bridge length is adopted as 77.48 m measured c/c of dirt wall.

2.4. Width of Carriageway:

For high level bridges constructed for the use of road traffic only, the width of carriageway shall not be less
than 4.25m for a single lane bridge and 7.5m for a two-lane bridge and shall be increased by 3.5m for every
additional lane of traffic for a multiple lane bridge. Road brides shall provide for either one lane, two lanes or
multiple of two lanes. If a median/central verge is constructed in a wide bridge thus providing two separate
carriageways, the carriageway on each side of the verge shall provide for at least two lanes of traffic and
width thereof shall individually comply with the minimum requirements stipulated above.
As per the prevailing practise of Rural Development Special Division, 2 lane bridges are proposed at every
location, hence the same is adopted here. The kerb of 0.475m is provided in both side, hence the overall
bridge width is kept as 8.45m.

2.5. Finalisation of Span Arrangement:

The difference between HFL & LBL is 2.718 m.
The hard stratum is found within a depth of 4.0m to 6.0m below the ground. In this situation, Open
Foundation is adopted for all pier and abutment.
The other parameter for deciding the Span arrangement is the height of approach road w.r.t. the HFL. In the
present case, the existing ground level at both end of the river bank is almost 1.0m below the level of HFL.
Therefore, we have adopted span of 18.67m effective span, which is 19.32m in total, in order to make the
bridge an economical one.

4
 Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via
Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

In this case four nos. of equal span of 18.75m effective span each has been adopted.

2.6. Vertical clearance above HFL:

Clearance is allowed according to navigational or anti-obstruction requirements. For high level bridges
having flat soffit or soffit with a very flat curve the minimum vertical clearance is provided above afflux HFL is
generally as noted below:
Discharge in Cumecs Minimum Vertical Clearance in mm
Upto 0.3 150
Above 0.3 and upto 3 450
Above 3 and upto 30 600
Above 30 and upto 300 900
Above 300 and upto 3000 1200
Above 3000 1500

Note: The minimum clearance is measured from the lowest point of the deck structure inclusive of main
girder in the central half of the clear opening unless otherwise specified.
In this case the vertical clearance from the above consideration would be 1200mm.

2.7. Determination of Hydrological Parameters:

IRC-5 has been followed to determine the following hydrological parameters.

2.8. Catchment Area:

Catchment area of the site of the bridge was determined using Google Earth & Global Mapper with help of
Latitude and Longitude of the site taken by GPS as per contour of the vicinity. The alternate method is to
determine the catchment area using Toposheet prepared by Survey of India. But now a days, the catchment
area using Google Earth is computed by most of the reputed Consultants due to the reasons as given below:
Toposheet prepared by Survey of India is based upon very old survey data
Google Earth map is based upon Satellite data of recent period.
The ridge and valley line can be prominently seen by rotating the images obtained from Google Earth, while
the same in Toposheets has to be determined based upon the contour given on map.
Thus although the time consumed in determining the catchment area, is more using Google Earth, the
accuracy is more too.
Another point is computation of catchment area using graph or planimeter and sophisticated software like
Global Mapper. The sophisticated software like Global Mapper gives much accurate result.
The Catchment Area has been enclosed as Annexure-II.

2.9. Determination of HFL:

The design high flood level (HFL) is determined corresponding to adopted design flood for the bridges under
natural and constricted condition. This elevation is important in the analysis for foundations, Length of bridge,
free board, Formation level, Hydraulic forces etc.
The HFL is ascertained from watermarks, if available or the permanent objects on the banks supplemented
by local enquiry from nearby inhabitants as to the highest flood levels reached during their living memory.

2.10. Determination of Afflux:

Afflux is the height by which this natural flood level of the river rises at any point due to constriction and/or
obstruction. It is estimated not only for its effect on the design of the bridge, but also to ensure that it may not
adversely affect condition on the upstream of the bridge site. The type of bed and bank material and type of
bridge influences the extent of afflux. Constriction of channel on account of flood banks, guide bunds, piers,
floor protection etc. increases afflux. Afflux is high in flashy rivers as well. Afflux may be calculated
approximately using Molesworth Formula as given below:-
h = (V2/17.88 + 0.015) {(A/a)2 – 1}
Where h = afflux in meters

5
 Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via
Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

V= average velocity of the water in the river prior to construction in m/sec.

A= Unobstructed sectional area of the river at proposed site in sq.m.
a= Constricted area of the river at the bridge in sq.m.

2.11. Determination of Linear Waterway:

For rivers with defined firm banks, the linear waterway is preferably kept equal to HFL spread at the site.
However, when the depths of flow near the bank is low in comparison with deep channel portion, constriction
of the waterway upto 2/3rd of the HFL spread is resorted to form considerations of economy. But careful
consideration has been given on the possibility of excessive scour of the banks or bed on the D/S of the
bridge or of excessive afflux on the U/S before deciding on any construction of waterway.
For natural channels in alluvial beds and having undefined banks, the linear waterway shall be determined
from the design discharge using some accepted rational formula at the discretion of the engineer responsible
for the design. One such formula for regime condition is:
W = C √Q ;
Where,
W = regime width in meters (equal to effective linear waterway under regime condition),
Q = Maximum Design Discharge in m3 /sec.
C= a constant usually taken as 4.8 for regime channels but it may vary from 4.5 to 6.3
according to local conditions.

2.12. Design Discharge:

Based upon the Topography Survey Data and hydrology survey data, discharge estimation is done as laid
down in IRC-5 using mainly three methods (i) Rational Method/Unit Hydrograph Method (ii) Empirical
Formula and (iii) Slop-Area Method using Manning’s Formula.
Here the catchment area is 182 Sqkm.
The other parameters as described in the above Report has been computed and enclosed in the
Hydrological Calculation Section. The alternate method is Rational Method, which is described here too,
although this should be used only for case where catchment area is less than 25.00 sqkm.

2.13. Discharge by Rational Method –

This is computed as per formula given below
Q = 0.028 × f × P × A × tc
Where Q = discharge in cumecs
f = Areal reduction factor
P = Run-off co-efficient
A = Catchment area in [Link]
tc = time of concentration = 0.385 (0.87 × L/H)
lc = critical intensity of rainfall = lo {2/(tc + 1)}
and lo = rainfall
L = length of longest stream in km
H = difference in elevation from proposed bridge site upto starting point of catchment

2.14. Discharge by Empirical Method –

Following equation lead the calculation of discharge by Empirical method
Q = CA3/4 where C = 14 from CWC recommendation
And A = Catchment area in [Link]

2.15. Discharge by Manning’s Formula -

Manning’s Formula :

6
 Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via
Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

V = 1 /n x R2/3 x S1/2
where,
V= the velocity in m per sec considered uniform throughout the cross-section;
R= the hydraulic mean depth;
S= the energy slope which may be taken equal to the bed slope measured over a reasonably long
reach;
n= the rugosity co-efficient.
For values of n, following Table is used. Judgement and experience are necessary in selecting a proper
value of n for a given stream.

2.16. Rugosity Co-efficient

Value of “n”
Surface Perfect Good Fair Bad
Natural Streams
(1) Clean, straight bank, full stage, no rifts or deep pools 0.025 0.0275 0.030 0.033
(2) Same as (1), but some weeds and stones 0.030 0.033 0.035 0.040
(3) Winding, some pools and shoals, clean 0.035 0.040 0.045 0.050
(4) Same as (3), lower stages, more ineffective slope and 0.040 0.045 0.050 0.055
sections
(5) Same as (3), some weeds and stones 0.033 0.035 0.040 0.045
(6) Same as (4), stony sections 0.045 0.050 0.055 0.060
(7) Sluggish river reaches, rather weedy or with very deep pools 0.050 0.060 0.070 0.080
(8) Very weedy reaches 0.075 0.100 0.125 0.150

Calculation of Discharge :
Q= AxV
= A x 1/n x R2/3 x S1/2
=  x S1/2
= A x R2/3 / n; Where
is a function of the size, shape and roughness of the stream and is called its conveyance factor. Thus the
discharge carrying capacity of a stream depends on its conveyance factor and slope.
The Hydraulic Calculation has been enclosed as Annexure-III.

3. Sub Soil Investigation:

In order to determine the type of foundation, depth of foundation and to calculate the size of foundation,
detailed sub soil investigation has been carried out to determine the engineering properties of soil/rock on
which the foundation shall be laid.
The entire process of this study consists of three parts:

3.1. Field Work (Boring/Drilling) at site.

The field work commences with identifying the bore-hole location, which is the actual pier/abutment location,
assumed during start of this activity. In the present case, boring/drilling activities were started at site,
considering the pier/abutment location at an interval of 19.0m.
The boring work using Shell and Auger method commenced in accordance with IS:1892-1979, which
consists of boring of 150mm dia borehole and conducting Standard Penetration Test (SPT) in accordance
with IS: 2131-1981 at 1.5m interval by connecting a split spoon sampler to ‘A’ rods and driving it by 45cm.
The numbers of blows for each 15 cm of penetration were recorded. The numbers of blow required to
penetrate till the initial 15 cm of the split spoon for seating the sampler is ignored due to the possible

7
 Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via
Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

presence of loose materials. The cumulative numbers of blow to penetrate the balance 30 cm interval is
termed as ‘N’ Value. The ‘N’ Values are presented on the borelog of each bore hole. Refusal to further
boring penetration was considered when ‘N’ value exceeds 100 or when practical refusal to further
penetration was encountered.
Disturbed soil collected in the SPT sampler was preserved in the polythene covers and transported to
Laboratory for determining the soil properties by conducting different Laboratory testing.
Collection of Undisturbed sample (UDS) is normally not achieved.

3.2. Laboratory Testing:

Following Laboratory Testing on soil samples have been carried out:
1- Natural Moisture Content as per IS: 2720 (Part 2)- 1973
2- Grain Size Analysis as per IS: 2720 (Part 4)- 1985
3- Liquid and Plastic Limit as per IS: 2720 (Part 5)- 1985
4- Specific Gravity as per IS:2720 (Part 3)- 1980
5- Unconsolidated Undrained Direct Shear Test as per IS:2720 (Part 13)-1986

3.3. Interpretation and Recommendation:

Based upon the field investigation and laboratory testing results, type of foundation, depth of foundation,
bearing capacity at foundation level is being reported.
In the present case, detailed sub soil investigation report has been enclosed as Annexure-IV.

4. Structure Design Methodology:

4.1. Selection of Type of Foundation:

The foundation has to be provided minimum 1.5m-2.0m below maximum scour depth. In the present the
non-erodible hard stratum is found within a depth of 4.5m to 5m depth. In such a situation providing open
foundation below non erodible stratum is practically possible. Hence we have adopted Open Type
Foundation is adopted for all pier and abutment.

4.2. Sub-structure:

Substructure include those portions of a bridge which are above the foundation which includes piers,
abutments and pier caps, dirt walls, return, wing walls etc. But exclude bearings and superstructure. It can
be built of brick/stone masonry, plain/reinforced/prestressed concrete. Steel selection of particular type
substructure depends upon the span and type of superstructure, the height of substructure, availability of
construction materials and construction equipments, period and time of construction and above all on overall
economy.
Substructure shall be designed to withstand the loads and forces as specified in IRC : 6 and the combination
of forces in accordance with Clause 706.1.1 of IRC :78. The factors of safety has been taken as specified in
IRC: [Link] B.2 and Table B.3 are used for Partial Safety of Factor for Verification of Structural Strength
and for verification of Serviceability Limit State respectively. For allowable stresses and other design
requirements relevant IRC codes depending upon the type of construction materials shall be followed.

4.3. Determination of Type of Piers:

The shape of piers and abutments in general should be such as to cause minimum obstruction for flow of
water. The shape of piers may be of any type, viz, wall type, solid circular type, hollow circular type, solid
elliptical type. But the most simplest to construct is wall type piers.
In the present case, the shape of pier and abutment has been adopted as wall type.

4.4. Superstructure:

It is the superstructure of a bridge that directly supports the traffic and facilitates its smooth uninterrupted
passage over natural/manmade barriers like rivers, creeks, railways, roads etc. by transmitting the loads and
forces coming over it to the foundation through the bearings and substructures.
Consistent with economy and local availability of the materials, labour and technology for a particular type of
superstructure selection may have to be made out of the following options.

8
 Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via
Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

(a) Masonry
(b) Reinforced Cement Concrete
(c) Prestressed Concrete
(d) Steel
(e) Composite construction which is a combination of any of the above.
In the present case, RCC T-Beam and Slab Type superstructure is adopted here.

4.5. Expansion Joints:

Expansion joints are provided at the end of deck to cater for movement of deck due to temperature,
shrinkage, creep etc. Expansion Joints make the deck joint leak proof, protect the edges of slab/girder and
also allow smooth passage of roads from one span to other by bridging the gap. Depending upon the gap
width to be bridges, there are various types of expansion joints in use at present and they are Buried joints,
Filler joints, Asphaltic plug joint, Compression seal joint, Elastomeric slab seal joint, Strip seal expansion
joint, Modular strip seal/Box seal joint, special joint.
In the present case, Strip Seal expansion joints have been adopted here.

4.6. Bearing :

Bearing are provided above pier/abutment over pedestal to transfer the load coming from superstructure in
the form of Dead Load (DL), Superimposed Dead Load (SIDL) and Live Load (LL) to the substructure. There
are various types of bearing in use at present and they are Tar paper, elastomeric, Pot PTFE, etc.
In the present case, Elastomeric Bearing has been adopted here.

5. Approach Road Methodology:

5.1. Height of Approach Road in the vicinity of bridge:

Height of the approach road can be taken as per the following clauses
i. As per IRC:5-1998 section 107.1:
Free Board for the approaches to high level bridges shall not be less than 1750 mm.
ii. As per IRC:SP:20-2002 clause 6.3
• The road subgrade level in fill sections is to be fixed so that the difference between
formation level and highest water table/high flood level is not less than 0.6 meter
• The difference formation level and ground level not less than 1 meter.
iii. As per IRC:SP 42-1994 clause 3.2
• In Plain areas, Road subgrade elevation in fill sections is so fixed that the difference
between the formation level (top of subgrade) and highest water table/ high flood
level is not less than 0.6 to 1 meter and between formation level and ground level not
less than 1 meter.
• In Cut and Fill sections and hill roads where it may be difficult to satisfy the said 0.6 to
1 meter criteria, drains may be provided to lower down the water table.
In the rural roads, the following compositions are followed as a common practice in Jharkhand State:
Granular Sub Base = 150mm
WBM Gr-II = 100 mm
WBM Gr- III = 75 mm
Prime Coat
Tack Coat
Premix
Seal Coat
The altogether thickness can be assumed as 350mm.

9
 Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via
Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

Taking camber as 2.5%, the difference in level between formation level at centre and formation level at edge
of carriageway for 4.1m carriageway comes as 51mm.
Thus the minimum height at centre of carriageway from the HFL can be taken as 600+350+50 = 1000mm.
Therefore, the minimum height at centre of carriageway from the HFL is taken as 1.0m in the present case.

5.2. Requirement of Curve Design for Approach Road

The bridge sites undertaken for construction are selected at the Government Level and the Consultants have
no role in selection of alignment. The site selected has normally earthen or metallic road where there is no
traffic movement. In most of the cases, the available land width is in sufficient even to accommodate the
abutment width of 8.45m. The connecting approach does not have any geometry in accordance with the
provisions of the Road Design Standards. There is no provision for land acquisition too. In such a situation,
the design of road geometrics has no significance, as the road has to follow within the available land width
only.
However, the design has been done based upon the given criteria as illustrated below:

5.3. Design Speed

Choice of Design Speed depends on the function of road and also terrain conditions. It is basic parameter
which determines all other geometric design features. Design speed for various classes of roads is given in
table shown below (taken from IRC: SP: 20-2002).

Design Speed (Km/h)

Mountainous
Plain Terrain Rolling Terrain Steep Terrain
Road Classification Terrain
Ruling Min. Ruling Min. Ruling Min. Ruling Min.
Design Design Design Design Design Design Design Design
Speed Speed Speed Speed Speed Speed Speed Speed
Rural Roads (ODR and VR) 50 40 40 35 25 20 20 20

This design speed is also dependent on the radius of horizontal curve. The maximum permissible
superelevation considered for plain and rolling terrain is 7%, while for hilly terrain it is 10%. The coefficient of
tyre friction with road way is considered as 0.15.

Thus the relationship between the velocity of vehicle (in Kmph) and permissible Radius of Horizontal Curve
is V2/127R = 0.22 for plain & rolling terrain

And V2/ 127 R = 0.25 for hilly terrain.

5.4. Permissible Gradient

Indian Roads Congress has laid down standards for gradients to be adopted in different terrains. Gradients
for different Terrains (as taken from IRC SP 20-2002) are given below.

S. Ruling Limiting Exceptional

Terrain
No. Gradient Gradient Gradient
1 Plain or Rolling 3.3 per cent 5 per cent 6per cent
( 1 in 30) ( 1 in 20) ( 1 in 16.7)
2 Mountainous terrain, and steep terrain
5 per cent 6 per cent 7 per cent
having elevation more than 3000 m
( 1 in 20) ( 1 in 16.7) ( 1 in 14.3)
above the mean sea level
3 Steep terrain upto 3000 m height 6 per cent 7percent( 1 in 8 per cent
above mean sea level ( 1 in 16.7) 14.3) ( 1 in 12.5)

Hence, for Plain Terrain desirable (Limiting) gradient as per above table shall be 2.5 % (1 in 40)

5.5. Grade Compensation

The amount by which the gradients should be eased to offset the extra tractive force involved at horizontal
curves is known as ‘grade compensation’. This should be calculated by following formula (taken from IRC
38:1988)

10
 Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via
Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

30+R
Grade Compensation (percent) =
R
Subject to a maximum of 75/R where R is radius of curves in meters.

5.6. Extra Widening at Curve

The Extra width of carriageway to be provided at horizontal curves on single lane roads is given in table
below of IRC SP 20-2002. For multi-lane roads, the pavement widening may be calculated by adding half the
widening for two-lane roads to each lane.

Radius of Curve (m) Upto 20 21-60 Above 60

Extra Widening for 3.75 m Wide Single
Lane Carriageway, (m) 0.9 0.6 Nil

The above extra widening has been proposed considering lane width of 3.75m. In our case, the lane width is
taken as 7.5m, which is 2 lane.
Hence extra widening of carriageway width at curve is taken as 0.6m, which is applied equally on both sides
of carriageway.

5.7. Camber
Generally, undivided roads on straight should be provided with a crown in the middle and surface on either
side sloping towards edge. However on hill roads this may not be possible.
Camber values for different Road surface types should be recommended from Table 2.11 of IRC:
SP:20-2002, which is shown below.

Camber (per cent)

Surface Type Low Rainfall (Annual Rainfall High Rainfall (Annual Rainfall
< 1000 mm) > 1000 mm)
Earth Road 4.0 5.0
WBM and gravel road 3.5 4.0
Thin bituminous pavement 3.0 3.5
Rigid pavement 2.0 2.5

From the above table, for the camber for bridge portion is taken as 2.5% and the same is followed for
approach road which is only 200m in each side.

5.8. Horizontal Curve

On Horizontal curve, the centrifugal force is balanced by the combined effects of superelevation and side
friction. So, from clause 9.4.1 of IRC 73-1980 the basic equation for this condition of equilibrium follow as:

v2
= e +f,
g∗R

V2
Or, R=
127∗(e+f)

Where,
v = vehicle speed in metre per second
V = vehicle speed in km/h
g = acceleration due to gravity in metre per sec2
e = superelevation ratio in metre per metre
f = coefficient of side friction between vehicle tyres and pavement (taken as 0.15)
R = radius in metres.
For Rolling and Plain terrain, the maximum value of e shall be 0.07
Hence, for Plain & Rolling terrain,

11
 Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via
Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

V2
R =
127∗(0.07+0.15)

Thus R = 0.0357 V2

But the value of Radius calculated above must not be less than the minimum permissible radius. Table
below from clause 9.4 of IRC 73-1980 shows the minimum radius of horizontal curve for different terrain
conditions.

Mountainous terrain Steep terrain

Rolling
Plain terrain Areas not Areas not
terrain Snow Bound Snow Bound
Affected by Affected by
Classificatio Areas Areas
Snow Snow
n of road
Minimum

Minimum

Minimum

Minimum

Minimum

Minimum

Minimum

Minimum

Minimum

Minimum

Minimum

Minimum
Absolute

Absolute

Absolute

Absolute

Absolute

Absolute
Ruling

Ruling

Ruling

Ruling

Ruling

Ruling
Rural Roads
(ODR & 90 60 60 45 20 14 23 15 20 14 23 15
VR), (m)

Note: Absolute minimum and ruling minimum radii corresponds to minimum design speed and ruling design
speed.
As per Clause 4.4.3 of IRC:38-1988, the minimum radius of curve shall not be less than 26.0m, where truck
also ply on road.
However, the minimum radius of curve of 15.0m for design speed of 20 Kmph can be provided as per Table
3 of IRC:38-1988.

5.9. Superelevation
Superelevation required on horizontal curves should be calculated from following formula. This assumes that
centrifugal force corresponding to 75% the design speed is balanced by superelevation and rest
counteracted by side friction.

V2
e=
225∗R
where,
e= Superelevation in metre per metre.
V= Speed in Km/h
R= Radius in metres

In the present case, the design velocity has been computed using superelevation rate of 7% , using the
above formula and taking 75% Design Velocity as 22.50 Kmph, e comes as 5.0%. Hence we have
adopted e as 7%. The superelevation shall be provided by the way increasing or decreasing the height
of pedestal below the superstructure.

The following Table (as per clause 5.3 of IRC 38-1988) describes the radii of horizontal curves for different
camber rates beyond which no superelevation is required.

12
 Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via
Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

Radius (meters) for camber of

Design Speed
(Km/h)
4 per cent 3 per cent 2.5 per cent 2 per cent

20 50 60 70 90

25 70 90 110 140

30 100 130 160 200

35 140 180 220 270

40 180 240 280 350

50 280 370 450 550

5.10. Vertical Curve

Due to changes in grade in the vertical alignment of the highway vertical curves at the intersection of the
different grades will be provided in the design so as to smoothen the vertical profile resulting in easing off the
changes in the gradients for the fast moving vehicles. Both summit curves and valley curves will be
introduced as per clause 2.11.3 of IRC SP-20-2002
The minimum length of vertical curve (as per Table-20 of IRC:SP:20-2002) is given here:
Design Speed upto Maximun Gradient Change not Minimum Length of Curve
(in Kmph) requiring Vertical Curve (in %) (in Metre)
35 1.5 15
40 1.2 20
50 1.0 30

The length of summit curve and valley curves (L) is guided by & the sight distance and the deviation angle
(N). The Sight Distance as per clause 2.9 of IRC SP-20-2002 is as given below:

Speed Sight Distance (metre)

Km/h Stopping Intermediate Overtaking
20 20 40 -
25 25 50 -
30 30 60 -
35 40 80 -
40 45 90 165
50 60 120 235

The Formula for determination of Length of Curve as given in IRC: SP-23-1993 has been presented here
i. For Summit Curves
a. When the length of the curve is greater than the sight distance
N∗S2
L=
4.4
b. When the length of the curve is less than the sight distance
N∗S2
L=
9.6
ii. For Valley Curves
a. When the length of the curve is greater than the sight distance

13
 Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via
Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

N∗S2
L=
1.50+0.035∗S

b. When the length of the curve is less than the sight distance
1.50+0.035∗S
L= 2 ∗ S –
N
Where,
N= deviation angle
L= length of vertical curve
S= stopping sight distance
Here, A is the algebraic difference in grade expressed in percentage
Equation of Vertical Curve can be expressed as:
Y = x2/a;
Where, y = ordinate of vertical curve at a distance of x
And a = a constant = 2L/N; L & N is defined as earlier
Thus maximum difference between horizontal and apex of curve at middle can be expressed as
m = L2/ 8R or LN/8 (SP: 20-2002)

5.11. Minimum length of approach where no curve is provided

As per clause 120.1 of IRC:5-1998, the minimum length of approach which should be provided in straight
reach beyond bridge is 15.0m

6. River Training Protection Work Methodology

6.1. Approach Road Protection

Nature of protection to be provided can be divided into the following broad categories

6.2. Approach Embankments subjected to flooding but where the velocity of flow is insignificant
(not exceeding 1 m/s) to cause Erosion.
These cases occur where river flows through flat terrain with large spills. The thickness of slope pitching,
size of stone, its gradation and filter design have been worked out as per para 5.3 of IRC 89-1997. However,
the designed values arrived at should not fall below those indicated in figure 8.1(A) or 8.1(B). The length of
the approach should begin and end at a stable section on the approach subject to a minimum of 15 m.

6.3. Approach Embankments which are under direct and frontal attack of river flow or otherwise
subjected to velocity of flow exceeding 1 m/s.
These cases occur where the flow is confined within banks during ordinary floods but spills during high
floods without meandering

6.4. Approaches to bridges located in the bed of meandering rivers with large khadir width
requiring guide bunds.
These cases pertained to rivers which meander in alluvial plains and have large khadir widths even under
ordinary flood conditions

6.5. Design criteria as per para 5.3 of IRC89-1997 are as follows

Free Board
The minimum free board to the top of approach protection above the water level is generally kept at 1.5 m to
1.8 m. (However, the same has been adopted here as only 1.0m, by instruction of Government’s Engineer)

6.5.1 Side Slope

Side slope of the road protection may be determined from consideration of slope stability of embankments
and from hydraulic gradient consideration. Generally a side slope of 2(H):1(V) is adopted for predominantly
cohesionless materials. (Here 1.5H: 1V is adopted, keeping in view of land availability)

14
Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via
Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

6.5.2 Slope Protection

The earthen slope of approach protection is protected against river action by covering them with
stones/concrete slabs. The pitching should be extended up to the top of approach protection and tucked
inside for a width of at least 0.6 m. Rear slope of approach protection are not subjected to direct attack of
river and may be protected against ordinary wave splashing by 0.3 to 0.6 m thick cover of clayey or silty
earth and turfed. Where moderate to heavy wave action is expected slope pitching should be laid up to a
height of 1 m above water level.

6.5.3 Pitching on the river side slope

The following conditions are taken into consideration
i. Size and Weight of stone for pitching.
d=Kx v2
where, K= 0.0282 for face slope of 2:1 and 0.0216 for face slope of 3:1
d= equivalent diameter of stone in metre.
v= mean design velocity in m/s.
For velocities upto 5 m/s the size and weight of stone is also given in the table below.
Mean Design Minimum size and weight of stone
Velocity m/sec Slope 2:1 Slope 3:1
Diameter (cm) Weight (Kg) Diameter (cm) Weight (Kg)
Upto 2.5 30 40 30 40
3.0 30 40 30 40
3.5 35 59 30 40
4.0 45 126 35 59
4.5 57 257 44 118
5.0 71 497 54 218

6.5.4 Thickness of Pitching

t = 0.06 x Q1/3
where, Q= design discharge in m3/s
The thickness of stone pitching computed from the above formula shall be subject to an upper limit of 1 m
and lower limit of 0.3 m.

6.5.5 Shape of Stones

Quarry stones are preferable to round stones as the later roll off easily. Angular stones fit into each other
better and have good inter-locking characteristics.

6.5.6 Placing of Stones

The pattern of laying shall be such that the joints are broken and the voids are minimum by packing with
spalls wherever necessary and the top surface is as smooth as possible.

6.5.7 Filter Design

Filter shall consist of sound gravel, stone, jhama (over burnt) brick ballast and coarse sand. The filter may be
provided in one or more layers satisfying the following criteria:
𝐷15 (𝐹𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟)
<5
𝐷85 (𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑒)
𝐷15 (𝐹𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟)
4< < 20
𝐷15 (𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑒)
𝐷50 (𝐹𝑖𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟)
< 25
𝐷50 (𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑒)

15
Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via
Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

In the foregoing, D15 means the size of that sieve which allows 15 % by weight of the filter material to pass
through it and similar is the meaning of D50 and D85.

6.5.8 Toe Protection

Launching apron shall be provided for the protection of Toe and it shall form a continuous flexible cover over
the slope of the possible scour hole in continuation of pitching upto the point of deepest scour. The size of
the stone required for launching apron to resist mean design velocity is given by the formula:
ϑ = 4.893 x (d)1/2,
where, ϑ= mean design velocity in m/s.
d= equivalent diameter of stone in metre
For Velocities upto 5.0 m/s, the size and the weight of stone is also given in table 5.2 of IRC 89-1997 which
is given below.
Mean Design Velocity Minimum size and weight of stone
Diameter (cm) Weight (Kg)
Upto 2.5 30 40
30. 38 76
3.5 51 184
4.0 67 417
4.5 85 852
5.0 104 1561

However, considering that this scheme is bridge project and construction of road shall follow once after
completion of bridge, and the huge cost involved in the protection work in accordance with the codal
provision, only 300mm thickness boulder pitching has been provided for approach roads which are under
influence of HFL, and a side slope of 1.5H : 1 V has been provided for scarcity of land availability.

7. Preparation of General Arrangement of Drawing:

Based upon the above methodology, a General Arrangement Drawing (GAD) is prepared showing the
Formation Level, Soffit Level, HFL, Ground Level, Span Arrangement, Length of Bridge, Type of Foundation.

8. Preparation of Detailed Design and Drawing:

Detailed design of various bridge components has been carried out in accordance with the provision of IRC
for bridge of NH standards and working drawings have been prepared accordingly. A few codes has been
mentioned which are normally used in design:
IRC:5,IRC:6,IRC:78,IRC:112,IRC:83,IRC:89

9. Preparation of Bills of Quantities and Quantity Estimation:

Base upon the standard method of computing volume, quantity estimation of different components of the
bridge has been done. The finished rate of items has been taken from the SOR of Jharkhand Rural Road
Development Authority, Govt. of Jharkhand 2018-2019 and the cost of the bridge has been worked out.

16
 PMGSY III PROJECT YEAR 2021-2022

SUMMARY OF COST ESTIMATE FOR THE PROJECT

Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road

Name of Bridge : - T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru,
Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.
District : - Bokaro
Block : - Petarwar
Package no. : - JH01BOKMARS121
Length of Bridge in Meter : - 77.48
Length of Approach Road in Meter : 60
`
Sl. No. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT (RS.)
1 BRIDGE WORK COST

1 Cost of Foundation Structure 1,10,35,619.40

2 Cost of Sub Structure 1,17,58,248.63

3 Cost of Super Structure 91,56,065.71

A Cost of Bridge (Structure Only) = 3,19,49,933.74

4 Cost of Approach Road 6,25,934.83

5 Cost of Protection Work 17,21,272.93

6 Other -

B Cost of Approach road + Protection work etc. = 23,47,207.76

C 18% GST ON "A" = 61,73,485.47

D LABOUR CESS 1% ON "(A+B+C)" = 4,04,706.27

2 CONSULTANCY FEE 2950 Rs Per meter + 18% GST = 2,69,707.88

TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST OF BRIDGE WORK

3 4,11,45,041.12
(A+B+C+D) :-
5 YEARS MAINTENANCE WORKS 1,91,592.02

18% GST ON = 34,486.56

LABOUR CESS 1% ON = 2,260.79

TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST OF MENTENANCE WORK

4 2,28,339.37
(E+F+G) :-

TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST OF BRIDGE PROJECT

4,13,73,380.49
(2+3+4) :-

Junior Engineer Assistant Engineer Executive Engineer

RWD (w) Division, Bokaro RWD (w) Division, Bokaro RWD (w) Division, Bokaro

SE
RWD (w) Division, Giridih , Circle
 PROFORMA-A

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJNA

DISTRICT WISE SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSALS FOR THE YEAR 2021 - 2022

Total Cost of Bridge including

Av. Cost per Mt.
Approach Road
No. of (Lakhs)
Length of (Lakhs)
Sl. No. District BLOCK Habitations
Bridge (m)
Covered
Const. Maint. Const. Maint.

1 Bokaro Petarwar 2 77.480 411.450 2.283 5.310 0.029

TOTAL 77.480 411.450 2.283 5.310 0.029

. SIGNATURE

NAME

STATE SECRETARY / HEAD

 PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJNA
PROFORMA-B
PACKAGE SUMMARY
Name of Road Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.
District Bokaro Package No.JH01BOKMARS121
-
Block Petarwar

Total Estimated Cost of

Cost of Average cost per Mt. of
Length of Average Bridge including
Name of Length of Bridge Bridge with Approach
Sl. No. District Name of Road Approach Cost per Mt. Approach Road +
Block Bridge (Structure Road
Road of Bridge Consultancy Fee + Other
Only) (Rs. in Lakhs)
(Rs. in Lakhs)

From To m m Rs. In Lakhs Rs. in Lakhs Construction Maintenance Construction Maintenance

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 13 14 15

Barki
1 Petarwar Bokaro Bendi 77.48 60.000 319.499 4.124 411.450 2.283 5.310 0.029
Sidhawara

TOTAL Total 77.48 60.000 319.499 4.124 411.450 2.283 5.310 0.029

Prepared By Sruitinised By Co-ordinator STA

SIGNATURE SIGNATURE SIGNATURE
.
NAME NAME NAME

DESIGNATION DESIGNATION

Checked By Technical Scruitiny done By

SIGNATURE SIGNATURE

NAME NAME

DESIGNATION DESIGNATION
 Proforma C (For Long Span Brdiges only)
PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA ( PMGSY)
CHECK LIST FOR P.I.U. & S.T.A.
( For Indvidual Bridge works with length more than15 m )
(To be filled by PIU)

1. Location :- State: Jharkhand District : Bokaro Block : Petarwar

Circle Giridih Division Bokaro RDD(RWA)
2. Package No:-
Seimic Zone
3. Name of the Road with
From T07-Osam (T018) To Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda
code:

4. Total Length of Road (Km) - 14.5 Km

Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via
5. Name of Proposed Bridge (if any)
Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

6. Length of Proposed Bridge (Excluding Approaches) - 77.48 Meter

7. Width of Bridge in m: - 7.50 M

8. Through Route/ Link Route Nos as per Candidate road list:

(i) Is the road a part of DRRP & Candidate YES / NO
if Yes, Sl no. of road in Candidate road:
If Yes Through Route/ Link Route No. T- 0 7 or L-

(ii) Name of the benefitted Habitation (s) with population Sr.N Name of habitation Population
1 Merudaru 1516

2 Koh 1318

3 Rajwartola 265

4 Osam 494

5 Katam kulhi 1446

6 Dhamona 174

7 Chirwabeda 604

8 Khaira Jara 548

Total 6365

9. Whether the part of the road proposal was sanctioned earlier under PMGSY : Yes / No

(i) If Yes, please mention the Phase, MoRD Sanction letter No and Date of sanction :
Phase : MoRD Sanction No. Date

Length Chainage : From : To:

(ii) Cost of the Road work sanctioned: Rs : Lakhs

(iii) Whether any CD/ Causeway was Sanctioned at or nearby location with the road
proposal and whether the same was constructed or not (if yes, the details thereof with chainage:

(iv). Whether any existing Causeway/bridge available at this location Yes / No

(v) If Yes, please mention the type of existing structure

Age of the existing structure NA
Length of existing structure NA
Width of existing structure NA
Whether the existing structure completed its design life Yes / No
If dialpidated, whether the bridge expert inspected the site and certified Yes / No
Copy of inspection report of bridge expert is attached with the DPR and verified
Yes / No
by the STA
10. Estimated Cost (Rs. In Lakhs) Total Cost (Rs in
Item Cost per m
Lakhs)
Approaches 6.26 0.104
Bridge Super Structure 91.56 1.180
Bridge Sub Structure 117.58 1.520
Foundation 110.36 1.420
Others (Guard wall) 17.21 0.220
Cost due to higher
specification such as higher 0.00 0.000
width and length etc

GST 12% 61.73 0.800

Labour Cess 1% 4.05 0.050
Total 411.45 5.310

MoRD Share: Rs State Share: Rs.

(MoRD share and State share to be calculated as per the norms of MoRD/NRIDA and Bridges proposed beyond 8.40 m
width and more than 150 m in plain areas and 200 m in Special Category States/LWE areas prorata cost should be
included in the State share)
11. INDEX MAP (not to scale ) : Attached

Enroute Habitations Name / Chainage

name/Road name
H1 H2

Name/Facility
Habitation
MDR-42

9800 m

Proposed Bridge Location CD3

12 Typical Sketch of proposed bridge showing schematic arrangement of spans

13. Typical Photographs of proposed Bridge Location.

PHOTO (i) At Chainage

(ii) U/S of Bridge Site

PHOTO

PHOTO (iii) D/S of Bridge Site

14. Type of Proposed Bridge :
(I) Submersible Structures like Vented Causeway or Submersible Bridge (submergible
causeways would not be allowed except in some unique geographies)
(ii) Box Culvert
(iii) Bridge With RCC Piers and Abutments
(iv) Superstructure Solid slab/PSC/Voided slab/ T-Girder / Steel
a. Type of foundation Open / Raft /Well / Pile / Any other
b. Bearing Capacity at Foundation Level

c. Arrangement of Spans
Total Span 4 No. of Vents 4 Clear Span of Vent 18.75 M

d. Critical Levels Road top level (RTL) 102.897 mtrs.

Average Ground Level(AGL) 98.0276 mtrs.
Nala Bed level (NBL) 96.54 mtrs.
Ordinary flood level (OFL) 98.838 mtrs.
Foundation level (FL) 89.04 mtrs.
Ht. of bridge h= (RTL-NBL) 6.357 mtrs.
Ht. of bridge H=(RTL-FL) 13.857 mtrs.
e. Catchment Area
(Catchment area should be based on hydrological survey or from toposheet)
Catchment area served 182 Hect
Heaviest Rainfall 80mm/hr.
Basis of Design Discharge 755.503
Waterway required 130 Sq.M
Waterway provided 77.48 Sq.M
f. Scour Depth (m) 7.22 M
15. Cost Details Cost Rs. 41145041.12
A. General Costs
Cost of Preparation of DPR (Limited to 1 % of Total cost of Bridge) 269707.88
B. Brdige Components
Grade of
Description of Components Quantity Cost in Lack.
concrete
Abutments 63.22 3.52 M25
Bearings- Elastomeric or Roller Bearing or PTFE 230400.00 1.94 -
Deck Slab 336.24 22.79 M30
Drainage 32.00 0.39 -
Earthwork (including for foundation) 2654.64 9.86 -
Foundations 768.72 45.88 M25
Joints 42.25 0.1 -
Parapets 170.16 5.62 M25
Piers 112.21 6.24 M25
Wearing Course 43.58 5.94 M30
Wing Walls 0.00 0 M25
Seismic Stoppers 4.00 0.22 M25
C. Road Component (for approaches/ Bridge)
Granular Sub base 50.63 0.88 GR II
Soil + Aggregate Mix 0.00 0 0
WBM Gr -I I 25.31 0.56 GR II
WBM Gr -I I I/ MPM 25.31 0.56 GR III
Prime Coat 337.50 0.17 -
Tack Coat 337.50 0.05 -
OGPC / Surface Dressing 16.88 1.35 -
Seal Coat 10.13 1.03 -
D. Protection works 220.00 17.21 -
E. Road Logo, other Road Furniture 4.00 0.28 -
F. Others 0.00 0 -
F. GST and LWF 0.00 0 -
Total Cost of the Project (Rs) 411.45
Total Cost of the Project (Rs) (In Words)
 To be filled by State Technical Agency (STA)
Name of the STA : IIT BHUBNESWAR
Name of Road : T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda

Name of Bridge with Chainage (if any) : Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to
Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

20. Is the proposed work is for CD/Causeway of any length or brigde with span excluding approaches less than 15m.
STAs need not clear such proposals

21 Is the Proposal entered on the OMMAS :

(Data entries to be verified by STA before Clicking the Propopsal)
a. Span of Bridge on web: m. b. Span of Bridge As per DPR m.

* Span of bridge: C/C distance along the centre line of the bridge between inner faces of dirt walls.

c. Whether type of foundation & resting strata as per survey report justified to be safe

d. Whether Hydraulic design is checked & found to be adequete as per site requirements

e. Whether RCC designs are checked and found to be economical & safe.

f. Whether the provisions made by PIU are sufficient & essentia from economy point of view.
22 If the Bridge is proposed on the existing PMGSY road
If Yes, Have you verified and satisfied yourself with all the items listed at Sr. No. 9, by PIU

Have you satisfied yourself that the road is a part of DRRP & Candidate Road list

23 Are you satisfied with the following

Engineering Surveys (L section, X sections must be verified)
Soil/ Material Investigation
Hydraulic Studies.
GAD prepared to meet the site requirements and attached with the DPR
(Catchment for structures to be verified from topo sheet. Location and requirement of structures to be verified from L section
and catchment area to be marked on Topo Sheet Copy )

24 Is the design of the following elements as per relevant and latest IS/ IRC codes
Foundations / Abutments / Piers / Deck Slab / Wing Walls

25 Does the Estimation Conform to Standard Rate Analysis and SoR generated for the current Phase for
PMGSY works and a copy of SoR provided to STA

26 Does the proposal have provisions for

PMGSY Logo Sign Boards and Information Board

27 Whether STA and Superintending Engineer have visited the site? If Yes, Date of Visit :
If Yes, Date of Visit :
Whether the joint inspection report uploaded on OMMAS
Kindly indicate whether the program of visit was informed to NRIDA for prior approval ?
28 Secific Remarks, if any, by STA
( Specific remarks of STA about the overall Bridge Project are necessary on each DPR)

29. Certificates:
Certified that the proposal of bridge is checked & found that the bridge is on the currently proposed road under PMGSY-
III

Certified that the Design and Estimation for the Proposed bridge are based on the latest IRC codes and guidelines and
Circular of NRIDA:vide [Link] #P-17035/1/2007-Tech. 30th September, 2010.

Certified that the Design and Estimation for the Proposed bridge are based on the data and SSR provided by PIU
Engineers . The Proposal after final Correction is entered on the [Link] Propasal may be considered for clearance.

Technical Scrutiny at STA done by: Co-ordinator

Signature Signature STA:
Name Name Signature
Date Date Name
Date
Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via
Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.
SITE PHOTOGRAPH OF PROPOSED BRIDGE SITE (UNDER PMGSY III)

Topography Survey Bridge Site

TBM

Soil Testing Site visit with respected SDO & RSA Auditor
 Check List of D.P.R.

1 Name of High Level Bridge - Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara
via Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

2 Hydraulic Parameters - Attached Page

3 Total Cost of Bridge - Rs 411.45 Lac

4 i) Per metre cost of Bridge (Structure Only) - Rs 4.124 Lac/M

ii) % Cost of Bridge Structure - 78%
iii) Per metre cost of Bridge (Overall) - Rs 5.31 Lac/M

5 a) Type of Bridge - R.C.C. T-Beam & Slab Type

b) Type of Foundation - Open
c) Length of Bridge - 77.48 Metre
d) Span Arrangement - 4 x 19.36 metre
e) Overall Width of Bridge - 8.45 metre
f) Foot Path - No

g) Approach Road Length of Approach Road Page

Total Cost
GANDHAUNIA MERUDARU (in Lac)
Total Length
SIDE SIDE
30 metre 30 metre 60 metre 6.26

h) Protection works if any - No

i) Guard Wall Length of Guard Wall Page

GANDHAUNIA Total Cost
MERUDARU SIDE
SIDE Total Length (in Lac)
L R L R
20m 20m 20m 20m 80metre 17.21

ii) Retaining Wall Length of Retaining Wall Page

Total Cost
GANDHAUNIA (in Lac)
MERUDARU SIDE Total Length
SIDE
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

iii) Hume Pipe Culvert Hume Pipe Culvert Page

Total Cost
GANDHAUNIA (in Lac)
MERUDARU SIDE Total Nos.
SIDE
0 0 0 0.00

6 Design Standard followed as per IRC - YES/NO Page

(i) IRC - 5 : 1988 - YES

(ii) IRC - 6 : 2014 - YES

(iii) IRC - 21 : 2000 - YES

(iv) IRC - 78 : 2014 - YES

(v) IRC - SP - 13 : 2004 - YES

 (vi) IRC - 89 : 1997 - YES

(vii) IRC - 38 : 1988 - YES

(viii) IRC - SP - 23 : 1993 - YES

7 List of Drawings enclosed - Page

(i) Index Map - YES

(ii) GAD - YES

(iii) Bore Log Chart - YES

Detail drawing of all the components of

(iv) - YES
bridges

(v) L/S & C/S of River - YES

(vi) L/S & C/S of Approach - YES

Typical Section of Guard Wall/ Toe Wall/ - YES

(vii)
Retaining Wall

Plan of LHS and RHS approach with - YES

(viii)
curve details

8 Contents

(i) Abstract of Cost - - Attached Page

(ii) Detail Estimate - Attached Page

(iii) Hydrology - Attached Page

(iv) Soil Investigation - Attached Page

(v) Structural design - Attached Page

(vi) Working Drawing - Attached Page

Stamp and Signature of Consultant

Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru,
Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.
BILLS OF QUANTITIES
SL. NH Sch.
DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY RATE AMOUNT
No. Item No.
A BRIDGE PART
Excavation for structures in ordinary soil (Earth work in
excavation of foundation of structures as per drawing and
technical specification, including setting out, construction of
1 12.1 (I) B Foundation
shoring and bracing, removal of stumps and other deleterious
matter, dressing of sides and bottom and bockfilling with
approved material) Mechanical means

(i) Foundation Depth upto 3m cum 1116.97 329.65 368209.16

(ii) Foundation Depth between 3m to 6m cum 762.20 391.46 298370.81

Excavation for structures in ordinary Rock not requiring

blasting (Earth work in excavation of foundation of
structures as per drawing and technical specification,

2 12.1 (II) B Foundation including setting out, construction of shoring and bracing, cum 775.47 412.06 319540.17
removal of stumps and other deleterious matter, dressing of
sides and bottom and bockfilling with approved material)
Mechanical means

Back filling behind abutment, wing wall and return wall

Sub
3 13.9 B complete as per drawing and technical specification cum 293.54 886.73 260289.96
Structure

PCC 1:3:6 in foundation (Plain Cement Concrete 1:3:6

nominal mix in foundation with crushed stone aggregate
4 12.4 Foundation cum 32.26 4917.97 158653.73
40mm nominal size mechanically mixed, placed in foudation
and compacted by vibration including curing for 14 days.)

Plain/Reinforced cement concrete in open foundation

5 12.8A Foundation complete as per drawing and technical specification, (PCC cum 290.82 4847.95 1409880.98
Grade M15) Annular Filling

Super PCC M-15 Grade Levelling Course below Approach Slab

6 14.10 cum 5.26 4757.44 25024.14
Structure complete as per drawing and Technical specification

Plain/Reinforced cement concrete in Foundation complete as

7 12.8 E Foundation per drawing and technical specification, (RCC Grade M25 cum 768.72 5968.30 4587952.13
using Concrete Mixer)

Plain /Reinforced Cement Concrete in Sub-Structure

13.5 F (p) Sub
8 complete as per drawing and technical specifications (RCC M
Case I Structure
25 using concrete mixer)
Sub
(p) Height Upto 5m cum 175.43 5560.78 975527.33
Structure
Providing weep holes in Brick masonry/ Plain/ Reinforced
concrete abutment, wing wall/ return wall with 100 mm dia AC
Sub pipe, extending through the full width of the structure with
9 13.8 Each 108.00 114.80 12398.40
Structure slope of 1V:20H towards drawing face. Complete as per

drawing and technical specification.

Furnishing and placing Reinforcement/ Prestressed cement

14.1C concrete in Super-Structure a per drawing and Technical
Super
10 Case 1 (ii) cum 336.24 6777.57 2278890.04
Structure specification, RCC Grade M 30
q RCC T-Beam & Slab (Height between 5m to 10m)

Approach Slab (M30 Grade) including reinforcement and

Super
11 14.11 formwork complete as per drawing and Technical cum 15.76 11383.48 179403.61
Structure
specification.
Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru,
Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.
BILLS OF QUANTITIES
SL. NH Sch.
DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY RATE AMOUNT
No. Item No.
Strip Seal Expansion Joint ( providing and laying of a strip
seal expansion joint catering to maximum horizontal
movement upto 70mm, complete as per approved drawings and
Super
12 14.22 standard specifications to be installed by the Per m 42.25 10290.00 434752.50
Structure
manufacturer/supplier or their authorised representative
ensuring complaince to the manufacturer's instructions for
installation.
Supplying, fitting and fixing in position true to line and level
Elastomeric bearing confirming to IRC:83 (Part-II) section
Super
13 13.14 IX and clause 2005 of MORTH Specifications complete CC 230400 0.84 193536.00
Structure
including all accessories as per drawing and technical
specification.

Super Providing drainage spout complete as per drawing and

14 14.9 Each 32.00 1207.51 38640.32
Structure technical specification

Construction of railing of M30 grade in-situ with 20mm

nominal size aggregate, true to line and grade, tolurence of
vertical RCC post not to exceed 1 in 500, centre to centre
Super
15 14.7 spacing between vertical post not to exceed 2000 mm, leaving metre 170.16 3302.87 562017.16
Structure
adequate space between vertical post for expansion,
complete as per approved drawings and technical
specificatoins.
Providing and laying Cement Concrete Wearing Coat M-30
Super
16 14.4 grade including reinforcement complete as per drawing and cum 43.58 13620.51 593581.68
Structure
Technical Specification.

Prime Coat (Providing and applying Primer Coat with bitumen

emulsion on prepared surface of Granular Base including
17 5.1 clearing of road surface and spraying primer at the rate of sqm 0.00 28.00 0.00

0.60 kg/sqm using mechanical means)

Providiing and applying Tack Coat with bitumen emulsion using

emulsion pressure distributor at the rate of 0.20 kg per sqm
18 5.2 sqm 0.00 10.00 0.00
on the prepared bituminous/granular surface cleaned with
mechanical broom.
Open - Graded Premix Surfacing (Providing, laying and rolling
of open graded premix surfacing of 20mm thickness
composed of 13.2 mm to 5.6mm aggregates either using
penetration grade bitumen or cut-back or emulsion to
required line, grade and level to serve as wearing course on a
19 5.10 (i) previously prepared base, including mixing in a suitable plant, sqm 0.00 109.00 0.00
laying and rolling with a smooth wheeled roller 8-10 tonne
capacity, finished to required level and grades.) (Case - I :
Mechanical method using Penetration grade Bitumen and HMP
of appropriate capacity not less than 75 tonnes/hour)

Seal Coat - Type B (Providing and laying of premix sand seal

coat with HMP of appropriate capacity not less than 75
20 5.12 (ii) tonnes/hours using crushed stone chipping 6.7mm size and Sqm 0.00 43.00 0.00

penetration bitumen of suitable grade.

Supplying , fitting and placing un-coated HYSD bar

17 12.40 Foundation reinforcement in foundation complete as per drawing and tonne 37.00 93986.17 3477488.22
technical specifications

Supplying , fitting and placing HYSD bar reinforcement in

Sub
18 13.6 sub-structure complete as per drawing and technical tonne 111.62 94159.05 10510032.94
Structure
specifications
Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru,
Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.
BILLS OF QUANTITIES
SL. NH Sch.
DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY RATE AMOUNT
No. Item No.
Supplying , fitting and placing HYSD bar reinforcement in
Super
19 14.2 super-structure complete as per drawing and technical tonne 50.74 95589.68 4850220.26
Structure
specifications

Providing and laying Filter material under pitching in slopes

20 13.10 Foundation complete as per drawing and technical specification cum 58.69 2606.42 152970.62

Providing and laying Pitching on slopes laid over prepared

filter media including boulder apron laid dry in front of toe of
21 15.4A Foundation cum 80.07 2030.14 162553.58
embankment complete as per drawing and technical
specifications

Carrying out confirmatory boring for soil

22 Lumpsum Foundation investigation/geotechnical investigation for each foundation LS 5.00 20000.00 100000.00
as per clause 2400 of MOST Specification.

23 Lumpsum Foundation Dewatering for Foundation LS 0.00 25000.00 0.00

Sub Total 31949933.74

Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru,
Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.
BILLS OF QUANTITIES
SL. NH Sch.
DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY RATE AMOUNT
No. Item No.

B APPROACH ROAD PART

Construction of embankment with approved materials

deposited at site from roadway cutting and excavation from
24 3.17 cum 846.64 43.32 36676.44
drain and foundation of other structures graded and
compacted to meet requirement of table 300-2.

3.19 Case Compacting original ground supporting embankment (. Rolling

25 cum 67.50 19.10 1289.25
II (i) with vibratory roller

Granular Sub- Base with coarse graded material (Table 400-

2) (Construction of granular sub-base by providing coarse
graded material, spreading in uniform layers with motor

26 4.2 grader on prepared sruface, mixing by mix in place method

with rotavatory at OMC, and compactiing with vibratory
roller to achieve the desire density, complete as per clause
401)

(i) for Grading - II Material cum 50.63 1747.90 88496.24

27 4.9A WMM

Providing, laying, spreading and compacting graded stone

aggregate to wet mix macadam specification including
premixing the material with water at OMC in mechanical
mixer (Pug Mill), carriage of mixed material by tipper to site,
(ii) a laying in uniform layers in sub-base/base course on a well cum 25.31 2227.52 56378.53
prepared sub-base and compacting with smooth wheel roller
of 80 to 100kN weight to achieve the desired density
including lighting, barricading and maintenance of diversion,
etc as per Tables 400.11 & 400.12 and Technical
Providing, laying, spreading and compacting graded stone
aggregate to wet mix macadam specification including
premixing the material with water at OMC in mechanical
mixer (Pug Mill), carriage of mixed material by tipper to site,
(iii) a laying in uniform layers in sub-base/base course on a well cum 25.31 2227.52 56378.53
prepared sub-base and compacting with smooth wheel roller
of 80 to 100kN weight to achieve the desired density
including lighting, barricading and maintenance of diversion,
etc as per Tables 400.11 & 400.12 and Technical
Prime Coat (Providing and applying Primer Coat with bitumen
emulsion on prepared surface of Granular Base including
28 5.1 clearing of road surface and spraying primer at the rate of sqm 337.50 51.75 17466.99

0.60 kg/sqm using mechanical means)

Providiing and applying Tack Coat with bitumen emulsion using

emulsion pressure distributor at the rate of 0.20 kg per sqm
29 5.2 on the prepared bituminous/granular surface cleaned with sqm 337.50 14.44 4873.50

mechanical broom.

Providing and laying bituminous macadam( replacing bitumen

by 8% with waste plastic ) with hot mix plant using crushed
aggregates of grading as per Table 500.4 premixed with
bituminous binder, transported to site upto a lead of 1000 m
30 5.10 (i) Cum 16.88 8016.16 135312.81
laid over a previously prepared surface with paver finisher to
the required grade, level and alignment and rolled to achieve
the desired compaction as per Technical Specification Clause
504.
Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru,
Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.
BILLS OF QUANTITIES
SL. NH Sch.
DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY RATE AMOUNT
No. Item No.
Providing and laying semi dense bituminous concrete (
replacing bitumen by 8% with waste plastic ) with 100-120
TPH batch type HMP producing an average output of 75
tonnes per hour using crushed aggregates of specified
grading, premixed with bituminous binder @ 4.5 to 5 per
31 5.12 (ii) Cum 10.13 10156.28 102883.14
cent of mix and filler, transporting the hot mix to work site,
laying with a hydrostatic paver finisher with sensor control
to the required grade, level and alignment, rolling with
smooth wheeled, vibratory and tandem rollers to achieve the
desired compaction as per MoRTH specification clause No.
Providing and laying Pitching on slopes laid over prepared
filter media including boulder apron laid dry in front of toe of
32 15.4 A cum 48.48 2030.14 98421.35
embankment complete as per drawing and technical
specifications. (Stone / Boulder )
Providing PMGSY LOGO as per drawing and technical
33 No 2.00 9814.24 19628.48
specification.
Providing Rectrorefractive sign board as per IRC 67 made
of encapsulated lense type reflecting sheeting vide clause
34 No 2.00 4064.79 8129.57
1701.2.3 fixed over aluminium sheeting 1.5 mm thk.
Supported on mild steel angle.

SUB TOTAL 625934.83

C GUARD WALL PART

Excavation for structures in ordinary soil (Earth work in

excavation of foundation of structures as per drawing and
technical specification, including setting out, construction of
35 12.1 (I) A (i) shoring and bracing, removal of stumps and other deleterious cum 271.200 143.67 38963.30
matter, dressing of sides and bottom and bockfilling with
approved material) Manual means.

Sand filling in foundation trenches as per Drawing and

36 12.3 Technical specification cum 26.680 1295.14 34554.42

Back filling behind abutment, wing wall and return wall

37 13.9 B cum 163.200 886.727 144713.91
complete as per drawing and technical specification

Plain/Reinforced cement concrete in Foundation complete as

38 12.8A per drawing and technical specification, (PCC Grade M15 ) cum 71.120 4897.14 348284.39

Stone masonry work in cement mortar 1:3 for foundation

39 12.7 (b) complete as per drawing and technical specifications. cum 108.000 3844.92 415251.74
Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru,
Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.
BILLS OF QUANTITIES
SL. NH Sch.
DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY RATE AMOUNT
No. Item No.
Stone masonry work in cement mortar 1:3 for substructure
complete as per drawing and technical specifications.
40 13.4 A cum 163.800 4091.57 670199.10

Providing weep hole in Brick, masonary/Plain/Reinforced

Cement Concrete abutment, wing wall/returnwall with 100mm
41 13.8 dia AC pipe, extending through the full widt of the structure Each 156.000 114.80 17908.80
with slope of 1V:20H towards drawing foce. Complete as per
drawing and Technical specification.

Pointing with cement mortar (1:3) on stonework in

42 13.2 substructure as per Technical specifications 10 sqm 28.170 565.60 15932.95

Plain /Reinforced Cement Concrete in Sub-Structure

43 13.5 B(p) complete as per drawing and technical specifications (PCC cum 6.000 5910.72 35464.32
garde M 20 ) For Coping

SUB TOTAL 1721272.93

Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda,
at CH-9800 Mtr.

QUANTITY CALCULATION
SL. NH Sch.
DESCRIPTION UNIT No. Length Breadth Height L×B×H QTY
No. Item No.
A BRIDGE PART
Excavation for structures in ordinary soil (Earth work in
excavation of foundation of structures as per drawing and
technical specification, including setting out, construction of
1 12.1 (I) B
shoring and bracing, removal of stumps and other deleterious
matter, dressing of sides and bottom and bockfilling with
approved material) Mechanical means
(i) Depth upto 3m

Abutment(A1) cum 1 10.30 9.25 3.000 285.83 285.83

Abutment(A2) cum 1 10.30 9.25 3.000 285.83 285.83

Pier - P1 cum 1 7.30 8.30 3.000 181.77 181.77

Pier - P2 cum 1 7.30 8.30 3.000 181.77 181.77

Pier - P3 cum 1 7.30 8.30 3.000 181.77 181.77

Total cum 1116.97

(ii) Depth between 3m to 6m

Abutment(A1) cum 1 10.30 9.25 4.000 381.10 381.10

Abutment(A2) cum 1 10.30 9.25 4.000 381.10 381.10

Pier - P1 cum 1 7.30 8.30 3.000 181.77 181.77

Pier - P2 cum 1 7.30 8.30 2.500 151.48 151.48

Pier - P3 cum 1 7.30 8.30 3.000 181.77 181.77

Total cum 762.20

Excavation for structures in ordinary Rock not requiring
blasting (Earth work in excavation of foundation of
structures as per drawing and technical specification,
2 12.1 (II) B including setting out, construction of shoring and bracing,
removal of stumps and other deleterious matter, dressing of
sides and bottom and bockfilling with approved material)
Mechanical means
Abutment(A1) cum 1 10.30 9.25 1.600 152.44 152.44

Abutment(A2) cum 1 10.30 9.25 1.579 150.44 150.44

Pier - P1 cum 1 7.30 8.30 2.600 157.53 157.53

Pier - P2 cum 1 7.30 8.30 2.600 157.53 157.53

Pier - P3 cum 1 7.30 8.30 2.600 157.53 157.53

Total cum 775.47

Back filling behind abutment, wing wall and return wall

3 13.9 B
complete as per drawing and technical specification

Abutment (A1) cum 1 4.500 7.65 3.080 106.03 106.03

cum 2 16.76 (Ar. X Ht.) 1.03 17.27 34.54

cum 1 1.100 7.650 0.667 5.61 5.61

Abutment(A2) cum 1 4.500 7.65 3.101 106.75 106.75

cum 2 16.99 (Ar. X Ht.) 1.03 17.50 35.00

cum 1 1.100 7.650 0.667 5.61 5.61

Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda,
at CH-9800 Mtr.

QUANTITY CALCULATION
SL. NH Sch.
DESCRIPTION UNIT No. Length Breadth Height L×B×H QTY
No. Item No.
Total cum 293.54
PCC 1:3:6 in foundation (Plain Cement Concrete 1:3:6
nominal mix in foundation with crushed stone aggregate
4 12.4
40mm nominal size mechanically mixed, placed in foudation
and compacted by vibration including curing for 14 days.)

PCC below Abutment Foundation - A1 cum 1 9.70 8.65 0.100 8.39 8.39

PCC below Abutment Foundation - A2 cum 1 9.70 8.65 0.100 8.39 8.39

PCC below Pier Foundation - P1 cum 1 6.70 7.70 0.100 5.16 5.16

PCC below Pier Foundation - P2 cum 1 6.70 7.70 0.100 5.16 5.16

PCC below Pier Foundation - P3 cum 1 6.70 7.70 0.100 5.16 5.16

Total cum 32.26

Plain/Reinforced cement concrete in open foundation

complete as per drawing and technical specification, (PCC
5 12.8A
Grade M15)

Trench Filling Up to Soft Rock Top Level

Abutment A1

Levelling Course cum 1 9.70 8.65 0.10 8.39 8.39

Abutment Shaft cum 1 1.50 8.45 -0.50 -6.34 -6.34

Return Wall Straight cum 2 4.50 0.40 -0.50 -0.90 -1.80

Return Wall Traingular cum 2 4.50 0.40 0.55 0.99 1.98

Heel Slab Straight cum 1 4.50 8.45 0.90 34.22 34.22

Heel Slab Triangular cum 1 4.50 8.45 0.55 20.91 20.91

Toe Slab Straight cum 1 3.50 8.45 0.90 26.62 26.62

Toe Slab Triangular cum 1 3.50 8.45 0.55 16.27 16.27

Between Heel & Slab cum 1 1.50 8.45 2.00 25.35 25.35

Volume of Concrete = 125.60

Excavation= 152.44

Annular Filling= 26.84

Abutment A2

Levelling Course cum 1 9.70 8.65 0.10 8.39 8.39

Abutment Shaft cum 1 1.50 8.45 -0.52 -6.60 -6.60

Return Wall Straight cum 2 4.50 0.40 -0.52 -0.94 -1.88

Return Wall Traingular cum 2 4.50 0.40 0.55 0.99 1.98

Heel Slab Straight cum 1 4.50 8.45 0.90 34.22 34.22

Heel Slab Triangular cum 1 4.50 8.45 0.55 20.91 20.91

Toe Slab Straight cum 1 3.50 8.45 0.90 26.62 26.62

Toe Slab Triangular cum 1 3.50 8.45 0.55 16.27 16.27

Between Heel & Slab cum 1 1.50 8.45 2.00 25.35 25.35
Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda,
at CH-9800 Mtr.

QUANTITY CALCULATION
SL. NH Sch.
DESCRIPTION UNIT No. Length Breadth Height L×B×H QTY
No. Item No.

Volume of Concrete = 125.26

Excavation= 150.44

Annular Filling= 25.18

Pier P1

PCC Below foundation cum 1 6.70 7.70 0.10 5.16 5.16

Pier Shaft Straight cum 1 1.300 4.500 0.70 4.10 4.10

Pier Shaft Circular cum 1 1.327 (Ar. X Ht.) 0.70 0.93 0.93

Pier Foundation Staright cum 1 6.500 7.500 1.000 48.75 48.75

Pier Foundation Tapered cum 1 78.696 (Ar. x Ht.) 0.267 20.99 20.99

Volume of Concrete= 79.93

Excavation= 157.53

Annular Filling= 77.60

Pier P2

PCC Below foundation cum 1 6.70 7.70 0.10 5.16 5.16

Pier Shaft Straight cum 1 1.000 4.500 0.80 3.60 3.60

Pier Shaft Circular cum 1 1.327 (Ar. X Ht.) 0.80 1.06 1.06

Pier Foundation Staright cum 1 6.500 7.500 1.000 48.75 48.75

Pier Foundation Tapered cum 1 78.696 (Ar. x Ht.) 0.233 18.36 18.36

Volume of Concrete= 76.93

Excavation= 157.53

Annular Filling= 80.60

Pier P3

PCC Below foundation cum 1 6.70 7.70 0.10 5.16 5.16

Pier Shaft Straight cum 1 1.000 4.500 0.80 3.60 3.60

Pier Shaft Circular cum 1 1.327 (Ar. X Ht.) 0.80 1.06 1.06

Pier Foundation Staright cum 1 6.500 7.500 1.000 48.75 48.75

Pier Foundation Tapered cum 1 78.696 (Ar. x Ht.) 0.233 18.36 18.36

Volume of Concrete= 76.93

Excavation= 157.53

Annular Filling= 80.60

Total cum 290.82

PCC M-15 Grade Levelling Course below Approach Slab
6 14.10 complete as per drawing and Technical specification cum 2 3.50 7.500 0.10 2.63 5.26

Plain/Reinforced cement concrete in Foundation complete as

7 12.8 E per drawing and technical specification, (RCC Grade M25
using Concrete Mixer)

Abutment (A1) Open

Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda,
at CH-9800 Mtr.

QUANTITY CALCULATION
SL. NH Sch.
DESCRIPTION UNIT No. Length Breadth Height L×B×H QTY
No. Item No.

Abutment Shaft cum 1 1.50 8.45 6.00 76.05 76.05

Return Wall Straight cum 2 4.50 0.400 6.00 10.80 21.60

Return Wall Triangular cum 2 4.50 0.400 0.55 0.99 1.980

Heel Slab Straight cum 1 4.50 8.45 0.90 34.22 34.22

Heel Slab Tapered cum 1 4.50 8.45 0.55 20.91 20.91

Toe Slab Straight cum 1 3.50 8.45 0.90 26.62 26.62

Toe Slab Tapered cum 1 3.50 8.45 0.55 16.27 16.27

Between Heel & Slab cum 1 1.50 8.45 2.00 25.35 25.35

Abutment (A2) Open

Abutment Shaft cum 1 1.50 8.45 5.98 75.78 75.78

Return Wall Straight cum 2 4.50 0.40 5.98 10.76 21.52

Return Wall Triangular cum 2 4.50 0.40 0.55 0.99 1.980

Heel Slab Straight cum 1 4.50 8.45 0.90 34.22 34.22

Heel Slab Tapered cum 1 4.50 8.45 0.55 20.91 20.91

Toe Slab Straight cum 1 3.50 8.45 0.90 26.62 26.62

Toe Slab Tapered cum 1 3.50 8.45 0.55 16.27 16.27

Between Heel & Slab cum 1 1.50 8.45 2.00 25.35 25.35

Pier (P1) Open

Pier Shaft Straight cum 1 1.300 4.50 6.200 36.27 36.27

Pier Shaft Circular cum 1 1.327 (Ar. X Ht.) 6.200 8.23 8.23

Pier Foundation Straight cum 1 6.50 7.50 1.000 48.75 48.75

Pier Foundation Tapered cum 1 78.70 (Ar. x Ht.) 0.267 20.99 20.99

Pier (P2) Open

Pier Shaft Straight cum 1 1.000 4.500 5.700 25.65 25.65

Pier Shaft Circular cum 1 1.327 (Ar. X Ht.) 5.700 7.57 7.57

Pier Foundation Straight cum 1 6.50 7.50 1.000 48.75 48.75

Pier Foundation Tapered cum 1 78.70 (Ar. x Ht.) 0.267 20.99 20.99

Pier (P3) Open

Pier Shaft Straight cum 1 1.000 4.500 6.200 27.90 27.90

Pier Shaft Circular cum 1 1.327 (Ar. X Ht.) 6.200 8.23 8.23

Pier Foundation Straight cum 1 6.500 7.500 1.000 48.75 48.75

Pier Foundation Tapered cum 1 78.696 (Ar. x Ht.) 0.267 20.99 20.99

Total 768.72
Plain /Reinforced Cement Concrete in Sub-Structure
13.5 F (p)
8 complete as per drawing and technical specifications (RCC M
Case I
25 using concrete mixer)

p Height Upto 5m
Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda,
at CH-9800 Mtr.

QUANTITY CALCULATION
SL. NH Sch.
DESCRIPTION UNIT No. Length Breadth Height L×B×H QTY
No. Item No.

Abutment (A1)

Dirt Wall cum 1 0.30 8.45 2.175 5.51 5.51

Bracket Straight cum 1 0.30 8.45 0.30 0.76 0.76

Bracket Tapered cum 1 0.30 8.45 0.15 0.38 0.38

Abutment Cap Straight cum 1 1.800 8.45 0.30 4.56 4.56

Abutment Cap Tapered cum 1 1.65 8.45 0.30 4.18 4.18

Abutment Shaft cum 1 1.50 8.45 0.346 4.39 4.39

Return Wall cum 2 4.50 0.40 3.080 5.54 11.08

Return Wall Cantilever cum 2 1.100 0.400 0.667 0.29 0.58

Abutment (A2)

Dirt Wall cum 1 0.300 8.450 2.175 5.510 5.51

Bracket Straight cum 1 0.300 8.450 0.30 0.76 0.76

Bracket Tapered cum 1 0.300 8.450 0.15 0.38 0.38

Abutment Cap Straight cum 1 1.80 8.45 0.30 4.56 4.56

Abutment Cap Tapered cum 1 1.65 8.45 0.30 4.18 4.18

Abutment Shaft cum 1 1.50 8.45 0.37 4.65 4.65

Return Wall cum 2 4.500 0.400 3.101 5.58 11.16

Return Wall Cantilever cum 2 1.100 0.400 0.667 0.29 0.58

Pier (P1)

Pier Cap (Straight) cum 1 2.10 7.70 0.750 12.13 12.13

Pier Cap (Tapered) cum 1 35.99 (Ar. x Ht.) 0.250 9.00 9.00

Pier Shaft uniform cum 1 1.300 4.500 1.872 10.95 10.95

Pier Shaft Circular cum 1 1.327 (Ar. X Ht.) 1.872 2.48 2.48

Pier (P2)

Pier Cap (Straight) cum 1 2.10 7.70 0.750 12.13 12.13

Pier Cap (Tapered) cum 1 35.99 (Ar. x Ht.) 0.250 9.00 9.00

Pier Shaft uniform cum 1 1.00 4.50 2.648 11.92 11.92

Pier Shaft Circular cum 1 1.33 (Ar. X Ht.) 2.648 3.51 3.51

Pier (P3)

Pier Cap (Straight) cum 1 2.10 7.70 0.750 12.13 12.13

Pier Cap (Tapered) cum 1 35.99 (Ar. x Ht.) 0.250 9.00 9.00

Pier Shaft uniform cum 1 1.00 4.50 2.369 10.66 10.66

Pier Shaft Circular cum 1 1.33 (Ar. X Ht.) 2.369 3.14 3.14

Pedestal (Variable Height) cum 24 0.80 0.60 0.178 0.09 2.16

Seismic Restrainer cum 16 0.50 0.50 1.000 0.25 4.00

Total 175.43
Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda,
at CH-9800 Mtr.

QUANTITY CALCULATION
SL. NH Sch.
DESCRIPTION UNIT No. Length Breadth Height L×B×H QTY
No. Item No.
Providing weep holes in Brick masonry/ Plain/ Reinforced
concrete abutment, wing wall/ return wall with 100 mm dia

9 13.8 AC pipe, extending through the full width of the structure

with slope of 1V:20H towards drawing face. Complete as per
drawing and technical specification.

In Shaft Each 1 52.00 52.00

In return Wall Each 2 28.00 56.00

Total : 108.00

Furnishing and placing Reinforcement/ Prestressed cement

14.1C concrete in Super-Structure a per drawing and Technical
10 Case 1 (ii) specification, RCC Grade M 30
q RCC T-Beam & Slab (Height between 5m to 10m)

Slab and Girders cum 4 per Span 78.00 312.00

Kerb cum 2 85.080 0.475 0.3 12.12 24.24

Total 336.24

Approach Slab (M30 Grade) including reinforcement and

11 14.11 formwork complete as per drawing and Technical cum 2 3.5 7.5 0.3 7.88 15.76
specification.

Strip Seal Expansion Joint ( providing and laying of a strip

seal expansion joint catering to maximum horizontal
movement upto 70mm, complete as per approved drawings
12 14.22 and standard specifications to be installed by the Per m 5 8.45 8.450 42.25
manufacturer/supplier or their authorised representative
ensuring complaince to the manufacturer's instructions for
installation.
Supplying, fitting and fixing in position true to line and level
Elastomeric bearing confirming to IRC:83 (Part-II) section
13 13.14 IX and clause 2005 of MORTH Specifications complete CC 24 40 30 8.00 9600.00 230400
including all accessories as per drawing and technical
specification.
Providing drainage spout complete as per drawing and
14 14.9 technical specification Each 4 8.00 32.00

Construction of railing of M30 grade in-situ with 20mm

nominal size aggregate, true to line and grade, tolurence of
vertical RCC post not to exceed 1 in 500, centre to centre
15 14.7 spacing between vertical post not to exceed 2000 mm, metre 2 85.080 170.16
leaving adequate space between vertical post for expansion,
complete as per approved drawings and technical
specificatoins.
Providing and laying Cement Concrete Wearing Coat M-30
16 14.4 grade including reinforcement complete as per drawing and cum 1 77.480 7.50 0.075 43.58 43.58
Technical Specification.

Supplying , fitting and placing un-coated HYSD bar

17 12.40 reinforcement in foundation complete as per drawing and tonne Foundation 37.00 37.00
technical specifications
Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda,
at CH-9800 Mtr.

QUANTITY CALCULATION
SL. NH Sch.
DESCRIPTION UNIT No. Length Breadth Height L×B×H QTY
No. Item No.
Supplying , fitting and placing HYSD bar reinforcement in
18 13.6 sub-structure complete as per drawing and technical tonne Substructure 111.62 111.62
specifications

Supplying , fitting and placing HYSD bar reinforcement in

19 14.2 super-structure complete as per drawing and technical tonne 4 Super Structure 12.684 50.74
specifications
Providing and laying Filter material under pitching in slopes
20 13.10 complete as per drawing and technical specification

Inside Return Wall

Abutment-A1 cum 1 15.45 0.60 3.16 29.25 29.25

Abutment-A2 cum 1 15.45 0.60 3.18 29.44 29.44

Total cum 58.69

Providing and laying Pitching on slopes laid over prepared

filter media including boulder apron laid dry in front of toe
21 15.4A
of embankment complete as per drawing and technical
specifications

Stone /boulder

Abutment-A1 cum 1 23.32 0.30 5.69 39.81 39.81

Abutment-A2 cum 1 23.42 0.30 5.73 40.26 40.26

Total cum 80.07

Carrying out confirmatory boring for soil

22 Lumpsum investigation/geotechnical investigation for each foundation LS 5 1.00 5.00

as per clause 2400 of MOST Specification.

Sub Total

B APPROACH ROAD PART

Construction of embankment with approved materials

deposited at site from roadway cutting and excavation from
23 3.17 drain and foundation of other structures graded and
compacted to meet requirement of table 300-2.

Earth work in embankement (GANDHAUNIA SIDE) cum 1 421.08 421.08

Earth work in embankement (MERUDARU SIDE) cum 1 425.56 425.56

Total cum 846.64

3.19 Case Compacting original ground supporting embankment (. Rolling

25 cum 1 60.00 7.50 0.15 67.50 67.50
II (i) with vibratory roller

Granular Sub- Base with coarse graded material (Table 400-

2) (Construction of granular sub-base by providing coarse
graded material, spreading in uniform layers with motor

26 4.2 grader on prepared sruface, mixing by mix in place method

with rotavatory at OMC, and compactiing with vibratory
roller to achieve the desire density, complete as per clause
401)

(i) for Grading - II Material cum 1 60.00 5.63 0.15 50.63 50.63
Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda,
at CH-9800 Mtr.

QUANTITY CALCULATION
SL. NH Sch.
DESCRIPTION UNIT No. Length Breadth Height L×B×H QTY
No. Item No.
Water bound Macadam (Providing, laying, spreading and
compacting stone aggregates of specific sizes to water
bound macadam specification including spreading in uniform
thickness, hand packing, rolling with vibratory roller 8-10
27 4.9A tonnes / Smooth 3 wheeled steel roller in stages to proper
grade and camber, applying and brooming requisite type of
screening / Materials to fill up the interstices of coarse
aggregate, watering and compacting to the required density).

Grading -II (Using Screening Crushable type such as moorum

(ii) a or gravel) (with Vibratory Roller) cum 1 60.00 5.63 0.075 25.31 25.31

Grading -III (Using Screening Crushable type such as

(iii) a moorum or gravel) (with Vibratory Roller) cum 1 60.00 5.63 0.075 25.31 25.31

Prime Coat (Providing and applying Primer Coat with bitumen

emulsion on prepared surface of Granular Base including
28 5.1 clearing of road surface and spraying primer at the rate of sqm 1 60.00 5.63 (Area) 337.50 337.50

0.60 kg/sqm using mechanical means)

Providiing and applying Tack Coat with bitumen emulsion using

emulsion pressure distributor at the rate of 0.20 kg per sqm
29 5.2 on the prepared bituminous/granular surface cleaned with sqm 1 60.00 5.63 (Area) 337.50 337.50

mechanical broom.

Providing and laying bituminous macadam( replacing bitumen

by 8% with waste plastic ) with hot mix plant using crushed
aggregates of grading as per Table 500.4 premixed with
bituminous binder, transported to site upto a lead of 1000 m
30 5.10 (i) sqm 1 60.00 5.63 0.05 16.88 16.88
laid over a previously prepared surface with paver finisher
to the required grade, level and alignment and rolled to
achieve the desired compaction as per Technical
Specification Clause 504.
Providing and laying semi dense bituminous concrete (
replacing bitumen by 8% with waste plastic ) with 100-120
TPH batch type HMP producing an average output of 75
31 5.12 (ii) tonnes per hour using crushed aggregates of specified sqm 1 60.00 5.63 0.03 10.13 10.13
grading, premixed with bituminous binder @ 4.5 to 5 per
cent of mix and filler, transporting the hot mix to work site,
laying with a hydrostatic paver finisher with sensor control
Providing and laying Pitching on slopes laid over prepared
filter media including boulder apron laid dry in front of toe
32 15.4 A
of embankment complete as per drawing and technical
specifications. (Stone / Boulder )
Boulder Pitching toward GANDHAUNIA SIDE cum 2 20.0 2.00 0.3 12.00 24.00

Boulder Pitching toward MERUDARU SIDE cum 2 20.0 2.04 0.3 12.24 24.48

Total cum 48.48

C GUARD WALL PART

Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda,
at CH-9800 Mtr.

QUANTITY CALCULATION
SL. NH Sch.
DESCRIPTION UNIT No. Length Breadth Height L×B×H QTY
No. Item No.
Excavation for structures in ordinary soil (Earth work in
excavation of foundation of structures as per drawing and
technical specification, including setting out, construction of
33 12.1 (I) A (i)
shoring and bracing, removal of stumps and other deleterious
matter, dressing of sides and bottom and bockfilling with
approved material) Manual means.

Length of Guard Wall toward GANDHAUNIA SIDE = cum 2 20.00 (L x Avg 3.55 71.00 142.000

Length of Guard Wall toward MERUDARU SIDE = cum 2 20.00 Area) 3.23 64.60 129.200

Total 271.200

Sand filling in foundation trenches as per Drawing and

34 12.3 Technical specification cum

` Length of Guard Wall toward GANDHAUNIA SIDE = cum 2 20.00 2.36 0.15 7.07 14.140

Length of Guard Wall toward MERUDARU SIDE = cum 2 20.00 2.09 0.15 6.27 12.540

Total 26.680
Back filling behind abutment, wing wall and return wall
35 13.9 B complete as per drawing and technical specification

Length of Guard Wall toward GANDHAUNIA SIDE = cum 2 20.00 (L x Avg 2.10 41.90 83.800

Length of Guard Wall toward MERUDARU SIDE = cum 2 20.00 Area) 1.99 39.70 79.400

Total 163.200

Plain/Reinforced cement concrete in Foundation complete as

36 12.8A per drawing and technical specification, (PCC Grade M15 )

Length of Guard Wall toward GANDHAUNIA SIDE = cum 2 20.00 (L x Avg 0.94 18.84 37.680

Length of Guard Wall toward MERUDARU SIDE = cum 2 20.00 Area) 0.84 16.72 33.440

Total 71.120

Stone masonry work in cement mortar 1:3 for foundation

37 12.7 (b) complete as per drawing and technical specifications.

Length of Guard Wall toward GANDHAUNIA SIDE = cum 2 20.00 (L x Avg 1.46 29.10 58.200

Length of Guard Wall toward MERUDARU SIDE = cum 2 20.00 Area) 1.25 24.90 49.800

Total 108.000

Stone masonry work in cement mortar 1:3 for substructure

38 13.4 A complete as per drawing and technical specifications.

Length of Guard Wall toward GANDHAUNIA SIDE = cum 2 20.00 (L x Avg 2.33 46.60 93.200

Length of Guard Wall toward MERUDARU SIDE = cum 2 20.00 Area) 1.77 35.30 70.600

Total 163.800
Providing weep hole in Brick, masonary/Plain/Reinforced
Cement Concrete abutment, wing wall/returnwall with 100mm
39 13.8 dia AC pipe, extending through the full widt of the structure Each 2 78.00 156
with slope of 1V:20H towards drawing foce. Complete as per
drawing and Technical specification.
Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda,
at CH-9800 Mtr.

QUANTITY CALCULATION
SL. NH Sch.
DESCRIPTION UNIT No. Length Breadth Height L×B×H QTY
No. Item No.
Pointing with cement mortar (1:3) on brickwork in
40 13.2
substructure as per Technical specifications

GANDHAUNIA SIDE 10 sqm 2 60.497 120.994 12.1

MERUDARU SIDE 10 sqm 2 80.333 160.666 16.07

Total 28.17
Plain /Reinforced Cement Concrete in Sub-Structure
41 13.5 B(p) complete as per drawing and technical specifications (PCC
garde M 20 ) For Coping
GANDHAUNIA SIDE cum 2 20.00 0.50 0.15 1.50 3.000

MERUDARU SIDE cum 2 20.00 0.50 0.15 1.50 3.000

Total 6.000
 Quantity Calculation of Approach Road

Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

Approach Road filling in data:

LENGTH (GANDHAUNIA SIDE =30m, MERUDARU

= 60.00 m
SIDE =30 m
Avg Ht of Embankement at A1 = 2.810 m
Avg Ht of Embankement at A2 = 2.831 m
Width of Embankement at top = 5.775 m 4.05+7.5/2 AVG
Width of GSB = 5.625 m
Depth of GSB = 0.15 m 3.75 + 7.50 /2 AVG
Width of WBM Gr-II & Gr - III = 5.625 m
Depth of WBM Gr -II = 0.1 m
Depth of WBM Gr - III = 0.075 m
Width of Prime Coat, Tack Coat, Premix, Seal Coat = 4.1 m
Depth of Premix Surface = 0.02 m
RL of Ground at A-2 = 99.721 m
RL of Ground at A-1 = 99.742 m
HFL = 99.258 m

Average RL 102.897 m

5.5m
7.5m

1
Average RL 99.732 m
1.5

Sl. No Items No Length Breadth Height Q= LxbxH Total

(m) (m) (m) (m^3) (m^3)

1 Earth work in embankement (GANDHAUNIA SIDE) 1 30.00 9.990 1.405 421.08 421.08
2 Earth work in embankement (MERUDARU SIDE) 1 30.00 10.022 1.416 425.56 425.56
1 Construction of GSB 1 60.00 5.625 0.15 50.63 50.63
2 Construction of WBM Gr-II 1 60.00 5.625 0.075 25.31 25.31
3 Construction of WBM Gr-III 1 60.00 5.625 0.075 25.31 25.31
4 Construction of Prime Coat 1 60.00 5.625 (Area) 337.50 337.50
5 Construction of Tack Coat 1 60.00 5.625 (Area) 337.50 337.50
6 BM 1 60.00 5.625 0.05 16.88 16.88
7 BC 1 60.00 5.625 0.03 10.13 10.13
8 Boulder Pitching toward GANDHAUNIA SIDE 2 20.00 2.00 0.3 12.00 24.00
9 Boulder Pitching toward MERUDARU SIDE 2 20.00 2.04 0.3 12.24 24.48
 Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via
Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

Section of Guard Wall

0.5
Road Fill

G.L. G.L.
0.3
b2 b1
0.4

0.4 0.4
B1
0.4

B2

Cross Sectional Area of the given section: =

H 1.00 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00

b1 0.15 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45
b2 0.20 0.63 0.75 0.88 1.00 1.13
B1 0.85 1.38 1.55 1.73 1.90 2.08
B2 1.65 2.18 2.35 2.53 2.70 2.88
4 Total Area for SM 1.39 2.94 3.74 4.63 5.60 6.68
3 Total Area for PCC 0.66 0.87 0.94 1.01 1.08 1.15
width at GL 0.70 1.22 1.41 1.59 1.77 1.95
Area upto GL 0.89 1.31 1.45 1.6 1.73 1.88
Area above GL 0.50 1.63 2.29 3.03 3.87 4.80
1 Area for E/w Excavation 2.70 3.34 3.54 3.76 3.96 4.18
2 Area for back filling 1.81 2.03 2.09 2.16 2.23 2.3

Length of Guard Wall toward GANDHAUNIA SIDE = 2 x 20

Length of Guard Wall toward MERUDARU SIDE = 2 x 20

Ht. of Guard Wall toward GANDHAUNIA SIDE at Start= 3 m
Ht. of Guard Wall toward GANDHAUNIA SIDE at End= 2 m
Ht. of Guard Wall toward MERUDARU SIDE at Start= 3 m
Ht. of Guard Wall toward MERUDARU SIDE at End= 1 m
 Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to
Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

STEEL CALCULATION
Superstucture
SL
Foundation Sub-Structure per Span
No Structure
(in Kg) (in Kg) (in Kg)
.

1 Abutment A-1 8701.04 26836.97 -

2 Abutment A-2 8701.04 26919.45 -

3 Pier P-1 5944.34 16380.82 -

4 Pier P-2 5944.34 16733.73 -

5 Pier P-3 5944.34 17016.30 -

6 Superstructure - - 12080.00

7 Pedastal - 1041.60 -

8 Seismic Restrainer - 1377.28 -

Total 36996.86 111621.46 12684.00

 PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA (PMGSY-III)

SUMMARY OF COST ESTIMATE FOR 5 YEAR MAINTENANCE WORKS

Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to

Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

Labour cess Total Amount

SL. NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT (RS.) GST 18%
1% (RS.)

1 First Year 23,685.57 4263.40 279.49 28228.46

2 Second Year 35,641.12 6415.40 420.57 42477.08

3 Third Year 47,596.67 8567.40 561.64 56725.71

4 Fourth Year 36,356.56 6544.18 429.01 43329.75

5 Fifth Year 48,312.11 8696.18 570.08 57578.37

TOTAL 1,91,592.02 34,486.56 2,260.79 2,28,339.37

JE AE EE
 Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.
PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA (PMGSY)
COST ESTIMATE FOR 5 YEAR MAINTENANCE WORKS
Length of bridge ( end to end of aproach slab): 77.48 M

1 Length of Approach Road: 60.00 M

(FIRST YEAR)
Sl. SOR Percentage Length Width Thickness Rate
Item Description Unit Quantity Amount (Rs.)
No. Ref Considered (m) (m) (m) (Rs.)
Restoration of Rain Cuts (Restoration of rain cuts with soil,
moorum gravel or a mixture of these, clearing the loose soil,
15.1.A
1 benching for 300mm width laying fresh material in layers not cum 5.0 60.000 0.875 0.250 1.313 222.19 291.62
(MoRD)
exceeding 250 mm and compaction with plate compactor or
power rammer to restore the original alignment, level and
Maintenance of Earthen Shoulder (filling with fresh soil)
(Making up loss of material/irregularities on shoulders to the
15.2.2
2 design level by adding fresh approved selected soil and sqm 15.0 60.000 0.875 15.750 12.59 198.29
(MoRD)
compacting it with appropriate equipment at OMC upto a lead
of 1000 m as per technical specification Clause 1903.)

15.10 Maintenance of Railings ( Reoair of RCC railing to bring it to

3 (ii) the original shape, cleaning and repainting as per drawings m 10.0 15.496 1496.88 23195.65
(MoRD) and technical specification Clause 1911 RCC railing
TOTAL COST OF MAINTENANCE FOR 1 ST YEAR 23685.57
 (SECOND YEAR)
Sl. SOR Percentage Length Width Thickness Rate
Item Description Unit Quantity Amount (Rs.)
No. Ref Considered (m) (m) (m) (Rs.)
Restoration of Rain Cuts (Restoration of rain cuts with soil,
moorum gravel or a mixture of these, clearing the loose soil,
15.1.A
1 benching for 300mm width laying fresh material in layers not cum 10.0 60.000 0.875 0.250 2.625 222.19 583.25
(MoRD)
exceeding 250 mm and compaction with plate compactor or
power rammer to restore the original alignment, level and
Maintenance of Earthen Shoulder (filling with fresh soil)
(Making up loss of material/irregularities on shoulders to the
15.2.2
2 design level by adding fresh approved selected soil and sqm 20.0 60.000 0.875 21.000 12.59 264.39
(MoRD)
compacting it with appropriate equipment at OMC upto a lead
of 1000 m as per technical specification Clause 1903.)
15.10 Maintenance of Railings ( Reoair of RCC railing to bring it to
3 (ii) the original shape, cleaning and repainting as per drawings m 15.0 23.244 1496.88 34793.48
(MoRD) and technical specification Clause 1911 RCC railing
TOTAL COST OF MAINTENANCE FOR 2 ND YEAR 35641.12

(THIRD YEAR)
Sl. SOR Percentage Length Width Thickness Rate
Item Description Unit Quantity Amount (Rs.)
No. Ref Considered (m) (m) (m) (Rs.)
Restoration of Rain Cuts (Restoration of rain cuts with soil,
moorum gravel or a mixture of these, clearing the loose soil,
15.1.A
1 benching for 300mm width laying fresh material in layers not cum 15.0 60.000 0.875 0.250 3.938 222.19 874.87
(MoRD)
exceeding 250 mm and compaction with plate compactor or
power rammer to restore the original alignment, level and
Maintenance of Earthen Shoulder (filling with fresh soil)
(Making up loss of material/irregularities on shoulders to the
15.2.2
2 design level by adding fresh approved selected soil and sqm 25.0 60.000 0.875 26.250 12.59 330.49
(MoRD)
compacting it with appropriate equipment at OMC upto a lead
of 1000 m as per technical specification Clause 1903.)
15.10 Maintenance of Railings ( Reoair of RCC railing to bring it to
3 (ii) the original shape, cleaning and repainting as per drawings m 20.0 30.992 1496.88 46391.30
(MoRD) and technical specification Clause 1911 RCC railing
TOTAL COST OF MAINTENANCE FOR 3 RD YEAR 47596.67
 (FOURTH YEAR)
Sl. SOR Percentage Length Width Thickness Rate
Item Description Unit Quantity Amount (Rs.)
No. Ref Considered (m) (m) (m) (Rs.)
Restoration of Rain Cuts (Restoration of rain cuts with soil,
moorum gravel or a mixture of these, clearing the loose soil,
15.1.A
1 benching for 300mm width laying fresh material in layers not cum 20.0 60.000 0.875 0.250 5.250 222.19 1166.50
(MoRD)
exceeding 250 mm and compaction with plate compactor or
power rammer to restore the original alignment, level and
Maintenance of Earthen Shoulder (filling with fresh soil)
(Making up loss of material/irregularities on shoulders to the
15.2.2
2 design level by adding fresh approved selected soil and sqm 30.0 60.000 0.875 31.500 12.59 396.59
(MoRD)
compacting it with appropriate equipment at OMC upto a lead
of 1000 m as per technical specification Clause 1903.)
15.10 Maintenance of Railings ( Reoair of RCC railing to bring it to
3 (ii) the original shape, cleaning and repainting as per drawings m 15.0 23.244 1496.88 34793.48
(MoRD) and technical specification Clause 1911 RCC railing
TOTAL COST OF MAINTENANCE FOR 4 TH YEAR 36356.56

(FIFTH YEAR)
Sl. SOR Percentage Length Width Thickness Rate
Item Description Unit Quantity Amount (Rs.)
No. Ref Considered (m) (m) (m) (Rs.)
Restoration of Rain Cuts (Restoration of rain cuts with soil,
moorum gravel or a mixture of these, clearing the loose soil,
15.1.A
1 benching for 300mm width laying fresh material in layers not cum 25.0 60.000 0.875 0.250 6.563 222.19 1458.12
(MoRD)
exceeding 250 mm and compaction with plate compactor or
power rammer to restore the original alignment, level and
Maintenance of Earthen Shoulder (filling with fresh soil)
(Making up loss of material/irregularities on shoulders to the
15.2.2
2 design level by adding fresh approved selected soil and sqm 35.0 60.000 0.875 36.750 12.59 462.68
(MoRD)
compacting it with appropriate equipment at OMC upto a lead
of 1000 m as per technical specification Clause 1903.)
15.10 Maintenance of Railings ( Reoair of RCC railing to bring it to
3 (ii) the original shape, cleaning and repainting as per drawings m 20.0 30.992 1496.88 46391.30
(MoRD) and technical specification Clause 1911 RCC railing
TOTAL COST OF MAINTENANCE FOR 5 TH YEAR 48312.11
 Lead chart
District Bokaro
Block Peterwar
Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara
via Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-9800 Mtr.

Name of TOTAL Lead

Sl. No. Source
Material in Km.

1.0 Sand Damodar River 16

2.0 Chips Narki 31

3.0 Metal Narki 31

4.0 Boulder Narki 31

5.0 Moorum Local 5

6.0 Cement Peterwar 10

7.0 Steel Peterwar 10

8.0 Bitumen Balidih 35

Junior Engineer Assistant Engineer Executive Engineer

RWD (w)
RWD (w) Division, Bokaro RWD (w) Division, Bokaro
Division, Bokaro

SE
RWD (w) Division, Giridih , Circle
 Construction of HL Bridge Over local Stream on Road T07-Osam (T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda, at CH-
9800 Mtr.
District Bokaro
Block Peterwar
Basic rate of Carriage of Materials
Rate of Carriage of materials as per S.O.R of RWD WING(PMGSY) EFFECTIVE FROM 2018 (PMGSY BRIDGE)

on

on

on

Charges on

Charges on

Charges on
Total Lead

Loading and
unSurfaced
unsurfaced
Multiplying

Unloading
Surfaced
Rate

surfaced

Charges
MATERIAL Unit

Hauling

Hauling

Hauling
Kutcha

Kutcha
Factor
(Rs.)

Road

Road

Road
Lead

Lead

Lead
(Km)
SAND 1.60 16 14 2 0 8.93 10.74 21.61 54.88 289.28 per m3

CHIPS 1.60 31 31 0 0 8.93 10.74 21.61 84.48 527.41 per m3

Metal 1.74 31 31 0 0 8.93 10.74 21.61 84.48 566.16 per m3

BOULDER 1.67 31 31 0 0 8.93 10.74 21.61 84.48 546.79 per m3

MOORUM 1.33 5 5 0 0 8.93 10.74 21.61 54.88 114.26 per m3

Cement 1.00 10 10 0 0 8.93 10.74 21.61 341.06 430.36 per MT

Steel 1.00 10 10 0 0 8.93 10.74 21.61 363.90 453.20 per MT

Bitumen 1.00 35 35 0 0 8.93 10.74 21.61 389.85 702.40 per MT

Junior Engineer Assistant Engineer Executive Engineer

RWD (w) Division, Bokaro RWD (w) Division, Bokaro RWD (w) Division, Bokaro

Supretending Engineer
RWD (w) Division, Giridih , Circle
 Analysis of rates for Bridge work
(1)E/W in excavation of foundation trenches in
(i)Ordinary Soil (Rate Vide item no.11.1B(i) of PMGSY.) Upto 3.0 m depth 329.65
(ii)Ordinary Soil (Rate Vide item no.11.1B(ii) of PMGSY.) Upto 3.0 m to 6.0 m depth per m3 Rs. 391.46
(iii)Ordinary Rock(Rate Vide item no.11.1(II)B of PMGSY.) not reqired blasting per m3 Rs. 412.06
(iv)Hard Rock Rate Vide item no.11.1(iii)A of PMGSY.)(blasting prohibited) per m3 Rs. 532.73
(2)Providing steel liner 10mm thick ------------
Basic rate vide item no.12.22 of RCD SOR per MT Rs. 95570.80
Carriage of metal 1.05 x 566.16 Rs. 594.47
Rs. 96165.27

(3)Bored cast insitu M35 grade R.C.C. piles -----------

Basic rate vide item no.12.25 of RCD SOR per m Rs. 7973.50
Carriage of materials
cement 0.474 MT x Rs. 430.36 = Rs. 203.99
sand 0.51 m3 x Rs. 289.28 = Rs. 147.53
METAL 0.305 m3 x Rs. 566.16 = Rs. 172.68
chips 0.275 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 145.04
Finished rate per m = Rs. 8642.74

(4)Providing and laying P.C.C. M15 Levelling course under the pile cap
Basic rate vide item no.12.39 of PMGSY per m3 Rs. 4013.32
Carriage of materials
cement 0.275 MT x Rs. 430.36 = Rs. 118.35
sand 0.45 m3 x Rs. 289.28 = Rs. 130.18
METAL 0.54 m3 x Rs. 566.16 = Rs. 305.73
chips 0.36 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 189.87
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 4805.01

(5)Providing R.C.C.M30 in pile cap

Basic rate vide item no.12.38 C(i) ofPMGSY per m3 Rs. 4355.80
Carriage of materials
cement 0.407 MT x Rs. 430.36 = Rs. 175.16
sand 0.45 m3 x Rs. 289.28 = Rs. 130.18
chips 0.90 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 474.67
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 5187.16
(6)Pile load test on single vertical
Basic rate vide item no.12.37 of PMGSY per MT Rs. 303.00

(4)Back filling behind the abutment, wing wall with Granular Material
Basic rate Vide item no.12.10( I) of PMGSY. per m3 Rs. 749.61
Carriage of material
Moorum 1.2 m3 x Rs. 114.26 Rs. 137.12
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 886.73
(5)Providing and laying of Filter media
Basic rate vide item no.12.11 of PMGSY per m3 Rs. 1813.27
Carriage of material
Metal 1.2 m3 x Rs. 566.16 Rs. 679.40
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 2492.67

(6)Providing and laying P.C.C. M15 Grade levelling course below approach slab
Basic rate vide item no.13.11(i) of PMGSY. per m3 Rs. 4013.32
Carriage of materials
cement 0.275 MT x Rs. 430.36 = Rs. 118.35
sand 0.45 m3 x Rs. 289.28 = Rs. 130.18
METAL 0.54 m3 x Rs. 566.16 = Rs. 305.73
chips 0.36 m3 x Rs. 527.41 189.87
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 4757.44
(7)Providing P.C.C. /R.C.C. mechanically mixed concrete in annular filling -do-do-
(a)P.C.C. M15 - Using Concrete mixer
Basic rate vide item no.11.3 of PMGSY per m3 Rs. 4103.83
Carriage of materials
cement 0.275 MT x Rs. 430.36 = Rs. 118.35
sand 0.45 m3 x Rs. 289.28 = Rs. 130.18
METAL 0.54 m3 x Rs. 566.16 = Rs. 305.73
chips 0.36 m3 x Rs. 527.41 189.87
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 4847.95

(8)Providing P.C.C. /R.C.C. mechanically mixed concrete in foundation -do-do-

(a)P.C.C. M15 - Using Concrete mixer
Basic rate vide item no.11.4(ii) of PMGSY per m3 Rs. 4173.85
Carriage of materials
cement 0.275 MT x Rs. 430.36 = Rs. 118.35
sand 0.45 m3 x Rs. 289.28 = Rs. 130.18
Steel 0.54 m3 x Rs. 566.16 = Rs. 305.73
chips 0.36 m3 x Rs. 527.41 189.87
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 4917.97
(11) (b)R.C.C. M20 - Using Concrete mixer
Basic rate vide item no.11.4 (iii) of PMGSY per m3 Rs. 4819.94
Carriage of materials
cement 0.347 MT x Rs. 430.36 = Rs. 149.33
sand 0.45 m3 x Rs. 289.28 = Rs. 130.18
Steel 0.36 m3 x Rs. 566.16 = Rs. 203.82
chips 0.54 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 284.80
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 5643.95

(12) ©R.C.C. M25 - Using concrete mixer

Basic rate vide item no.11.4 (v) of PMGSY per m3 Rs. 5130.50
Carriage of materials
cement 0.404 MT x Rs. 430.36 = Rs. 173.87
sand 0.45 m3 x Rs. 289.28 = Rs. 130.18
chips 0.90 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 474.67
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 5968.30

(9) (d)R.C.C. M30 - Using concrete mixer

Basic rate vide item no.13.1 (iii) of PMGSY per m3 Rs. 5997.57
Carriage of materials
cement 0.407 MT x Rs. 430.36 = Rs. 175.16
sand 0.45 m3 x Rs. 289.28 = Rs. 130.18
chips 0.90 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 474.67
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 6777.57

(14)Providing P.C.C. M10 mechanically mixed concrete in abutment or pier foundation -do-do-
Basic rate vide item no.11.4(i) of PMGSY per m3 Rs. 4261.13
Carriage of materials
cement 0.23 MT x Rs. 430.36 = Rs. 98.98
sand 0.45 m3 x Rs. 289.28 = Rs. 130.18
Steel 0.9 m3 x Rs. 566.16 = Rs. 509.55
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 5049.83

(15) Providing P.C.C./[Link] Substructure -do-do-

(a)R.C.C. M20 - Using Concrete mixer
Basic rate vide item no.12.5 (iii) of PMGSY per m3 Rs. 5098.02
Carriage of materials
cement 0.347 MT x Rs. 430.36 = Rs. 149.33
sand 0.45 m3 x Rs. 289.28 = Rs. 130.18
 chips 0.90 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 474.67
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 5910.72

(10) (b)R.C.C. M25 - Using Concrete mixer

Basic rate vide item no.12.50(iv) of PMGSY. per m3 Rs. 5439.56
Carriage of materials
cement 0.403 MT x Rs. 430.36 = Rs. 173.44
sand 0.45 m3 x Rs. 289.28 = Rs. 130.18
chips 0.90 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 474.67
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 6217.84

(b)R.C.C. M25 - Using Concrete mixer For height above 5 m upto 10 m same as above with following changes:
Basic rate vide item no.12.5 (iv) of PMGSY. per m3 Rs. 4782.50
Carriage of materials
cement 0.403 MT x Rs. 430.36 = Rs. 173.44
sand 0.45 m3 x Rs. 289.28 = Rs. 130.18
chips 0.90 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 474.67
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 5560.78
(11) (c)R.C.C. M30 - Using Concrete mixer
Basic rate vide item no.13.1 (iii) of PMGSY per m3 Rs. 5997.57
Upto 5.0 m height
Carriage of materials
cement 0.407 MT x Rs. 430.36 = Rs. 175.16
sand 0.45 m3 x Rs. 289.28 = Rs. 130.18
chips 0.90 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 474.67
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 6777.57

(e)R.C.C. M30 - Using concrete mixer

Basic rate vide item no.12.8 (G)q of PMGSY per m3 Rs. 4826.70
upto 5.0 m to 10.0 m height
Carriage of materials
cement 0.407 MT x Rs. 430.36 = Rs. 175.16
sand 0.45 m3 x Rs. 289.28 = Rs. 130.18
chips 0.90 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 474.67
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 5662.77
(18) (d)R.C.C. M35 - Using Concrete mixer
Basic rate vide item no.13.5 (H) of PMGSY per m3 Rs. 4835.20
Carriage of materials
cement 0.422 MT x Rs. 430.36 = Rs. 181.61
sand 0.45 m3 x Rs. 289.28 = Rs. 130.18
chips 0.90 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 474.67
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 5677.87

(12)Providing P.C.C./[Link] Superstructure -do-do-

(i) T Beam Slab Super Structure
(a)R.C.C. M30 - Using Concrete mixer
Basic rate vide item no.13.1(iii) of PMGSY. per m3 Rs. 5997.57
Carriage of materials
cement 0.407 MT x Rs. 430.36 = Rs. 175.16
sand 0.45 m3 x Rs. 289.28 = Rs. 130.18
chips 0.90 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 474.67
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 6777.57

(20) (ii) T-Beam Super Structure

(a)R.C.C. M30 - Using Concrete mixer
Basic rate vide item no.14.1 (C-ii) of PMGSY per m3 Rs. 5997.57
Carriage of materials
cement 0.407 MT x Rs. 430.36 = Rs. 175.16
sand 0.45 m3 x Rs. 289.28 = Rs. 130.18
 chips 0.90 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 474.67
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 6777.57

(13) Providing weep holes -do-do-

Basic rate vide item no.12.9 of PMGSY each Rs. 114.80

(14) supplying ,fitting and placing HYSD bars -do-do-

(a) Foundation
Basic rate vide item no.11.7 of PMGSY per MT Rs. 93534.29
carriage of steel
1.05 MT x Rs. 430.36 Rs. 451.88
Finished rate per MT = Rs. 93986.17

(b) Sub Structure

Basic rate vide item no.12.6 of PMGSY. per MT Rs. 93707.17
carriage of steel
1.05 MT x Rs. 430.36 Rs. 451.88
Finished rate per MT = Rs. 94159.05

(c) Super Structure

Basic rate vide item no.13.2 ofPMGSY per MT Rs. 95137.80
carriage of steel
1.05 MT x Rs. 430.36 Rs. 451.88
Finished rate per MT = Rs. 95589.68

(15) Providing and laying M30 Grade c.c. wearing coat including reinforcement
Basic rate vide item no.13.5 ofPMGSY per m3 Rs. 12808.23
Carriage of materials
cement 0.407 MT x Rs. 430.36 = Rs. 175.16
sand 0.45 m3 x Rs. 289.28 = Rs. 130.18
chips 0.90 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 474.67
steel 0.075 MT x Rs. 430.36 Rs. 32.28
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 13620.51

(16) Construction of precast R.C.C. railing of M25 grade -do-do-

Basic rate vide item no.13.6 of PMGSY per m Rs. 3228.99
Carriage of materials
cement 0.035 MT x Rs. 430.36 = Rs. 15.06
sand 0.038 m3 x Rs. 289.28 = Rs. 10.99
chips 0.076 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 40.08
steel 0.018 MT x Rs. 430.36 Rs. 7.75
Finished rate per m = Rs. 3302.87

(17) Drainage spouts -do-do-

Basic rate vide item no.13.10 of PMGSY each Rs. 1207.51

(18) Providing and laying R.C.C.M25 in approach slab -do-do-

Basic rate vide item no.13.12 ofPMGSY per m3 Rs. 10581.96
Carriage of materials
cement 0.407 MT x Rs. 430.36 = Rs. 175.16
sand 0.45 m3 x Rs. 289.28 = Rs. 130.18
chips 0.90 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 474.67
steel 0.050 MT x Rs. 430.36 Rs. 21.52
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 11383.48

(27) Providing painting two coats on unplastered concrete surface -do-do-

Basic rate vide item no.14.16 ofPMGSY. per m2 Rs. 56.56

(28) Providing and fixing of retro-reflectorised ,cautionary,mandatory and

informatory sign -do-do-
(a)90 cm. equilateral triangle Basic rate vide item no.8.4(i) of PMGSY Each Rs. 4325.00
(b)60 cm. equilateral triangle Basic rate vide item no.8.4(ii) of PMGSY Each Rs. 2716.00
( c )60 cm.x60 cm. sqare Basic rate vide item no.8.4(vii) of PMGSY Each Rs. 4401.00
(19) Expansion Joint (Providing and laying of a strip seal expansion joint catering to
14.22 of RCD maximum horizontal movement upto 70 mm, complete as per approved drawings Rs. 10290.00
SOR and standard specifications to be installed by the manufacturer/supplier or
(20) Rs. 0.84
13.14 RCD SOR Supplying, fitting and fixing in position true to line and level elastomeric bearing
conforming to IRC: 83 (Part-II) section IX and clause 2005 of MoRTH specifications
complete including all accessories as per drawing and Technical Specifications.

21) 13.16 Providing and fixing with premould exp joint filler 303.63

Analysis of rates for Approach Road

1.0 Clearing and Grubbing Item No. 2.3 of PMGSY. per hectare Rs. 57699.09
2.0 Shifting of Telephone/Electric poles
Item No. 2.23 of PMGSY. per pole Rs.
3.0 cutting of trees Item No. 2.3A of PMGSY.
(a) Girth from 0.3m to 0.60m Each Rs. 246.09
(a) Girth from 0.6m to 0.90m Each Rs. 393.47
(a) Girth from 0.9m to 1.80m Each Rs. 831.12
(a) Girth >1.80 m Each Rs. 1629.80
4.0 Dismantalling of flexible pavement
(i) Bituminious Course Item No.2.14(i)A of PMGSY. per m3 Rs. 662.74
(ii) Granular Course Item No.2.14(i)B of PMGSY. per m3 Rs. 459.59

5.0 E/W in cutting

(a) in ordinary soil Item No. 3.5(i) of PMGSY. per m3 Rs. 143.67
(b) soft rock Item No. 3.8 (iii)of [Link] m3 Rs. 223.48
(c) hard rock (blasting prohibited) Item No. 3.9 of PMGSY. per m3 Rs. 368.95

6.0 E/W in filling of sub-grade

(a)Earth obtained from cutting of road,drain
Item No. 3.14(A) of PMGSY. per m3 Rs. 98.43
(b) Earth obtained from borrow pits
Item No. 3.14(b) of PMGSY. per m3 Rs. 144.38

7 Compacting original ground supporting embankment

Item No. 3.15(i) of PMGSY. per m3 Rs. 19.10

7.0 Disposal of Earth with 5.0Km Additional lead Rs. 0.00

7 Providing coarse graded GSB with Grading -II material

Basic rate vide item no.4.1(a) of PMGSY per m3 Rs. 1209.79
Carriage of materials
metal 0.419 MT x Rs. 566.16 = Rs. 237.09
chips 0.300 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 158.22
Sand 0.481 m3 x Rs. 289.28 = Rs. 139.21
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 1744.31

8 Providing WBM
Basic rate vide item no.4.7(i) of PMGSY. per m3 Rs. 1795.83
Carriage of materials
metal 0.396 MT x Rs. 566.16 = Rs. 224.20
chips 0.528 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 278.47
sand 0.396 m3 x Rs. 289.28 = Rs. 114.55
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 2413.06
9 Providing WBM Gr-II with Crushable screening material Type"B"
Basic rate vide item no.4.7 ii of PMGSY per m3 Rs. 1771.24
Carriage of materials
metal 1.21 MT x Rs. 566.16 = Rs. 685.06
chips 0.16 m3 m3Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 0.00
Moorum 0.293 m3 m3Rs. 114.26 = Rs. 33.514
Rs. 2489.81
10 Providing WBM Gr-III with Crushable screening material Type"B"
Basic rate vide item no.4.7 iii of PMGSY. per m3 Rs. 1873.33
Carriage of materials
metal 1.21 MT x Rs. 566.16 = Rs. 685.06
chips 0.24 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 126.58
Moorum 0.2933 m3 m3Rs. 114.26 = Rs. 33.51
Rs. 2718.48
11 Providing Prime Coat
Basic rate vide item no.5.1 ii of PMGSY per m3 Rs. 51.16
Carriage of materials
bitumen 0.00085 MT x Rs. 702.40 = Rs. 0.59
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 51.75

12.0 Providing Tack coat

Basic rate vide item no.5.2 ii of PMGSY. per m3 Rs. 18.75
Carriage of materials
bitumen 0.0002 MT x Rs. 702.40 = Rs. 0.14
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 18.89

13.0 BUSG
Basic rate vide item no.5.4 iiof PMGSY. per m2 Rs. 274.27
bitumen 0.003 MT x Rs. 702.40 = Rs. 2.11
chips 0.013 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 6.86
metal 0.10 m3 x Rs. 566.16 = Rs. 56.62

Finished rate per m2 = Rs. 339.85

14.0 providing B.M. Gr-I

A Basic rate vide item no.5.3 ofPMGSY per m3 Rs. 6678.03
Carriage of materials
bitumen 0.072 MT x Rs. 702.40 = Rs. 50.57
chips 1.42 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 748.92
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 7477.52

15.0 providing B.M. Gr-II

B Basic rate vide item no.5.3 of PMGSY. per m3 Rs. 6371.00
Carriage of materials
bitumen 0.072 MT x Rs. 702.40 = Rs. 50.57
chips 1.42 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 748.92
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 7242.20

16.0 providing D.B.M.(Grading I)

A Basic rate vide item no.5.6 of PMGSY per m3 Rs. 7607.00
Carriage of materials
bitumen 0.0981 MT x Rs. 702.40 = Rs. 68.91
chips 1.444 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 761.58
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 8521.86
16.0 providing D.B.M.(Grading II)
B Basic rate vide item no.5.6 of PMGSY. per m3 Rs. 7681.00
Carriage of materials
bitumen 0.0981 MT x Rs. 702.40 = Rs. 68.91
chips 1.444 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 761.58
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 8596.60
17.0 providing B.C. (Gading I)
A Basic rate vide item no.5.8 of PMGSY per m3 Rs. 7504.00
Carriage of materials
bitumen 0.1178 MT x Rs. 702.40 = Rs. 82.74
chips 1.462 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 771.07
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 8441.39

17.0 providing B.C. (Gading II)

B Basic rate vide item no.5.8 ofPMGSY per m3 Rs. 7406.00
Carriage of materials
bitumen 0.1178 MT x Rs. 702.40 = Rs. 82.74
chips 1.462 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 771.07
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 8342.41

18.0 providing S.D.B.C. Gr-I

A Basic rate vide item no.5.7 of PMGSY per m3 Rs. 8037.00
Carriage of materials
bitumen 0.115 MT x Rs. 702.40 = Rs. 80.78
chips 1.46 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 770.02
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 8976.67

18.0 providing S.D.B.C. Gr-II

B Basic rate vide item no.5.7 of PMGSY per m3 Rs. 8530.00
Carriage of materials
bitumen 0.115 MT x Rs. 702.40 = Rs. 80.78
chips 1.46 m3 x Rs. 527.41 = Rs. 770.02
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 9474.60

15.0 20mm thick open graded pre mix carpet

Basic rate vide item no.5.9 (I) of PMGSY Rs. 134.02
Carriage of materials
Bitumen 0.00146 MT x Rs. 702.40 Rs. 1.03
chips 0.02700 m3 x Rs. 527.41 Rs. 14.24
Finished rate per m3 Rs. 149.29

16.0 MIxed seal coat Type A

Basic Rate per m2 vide item no.5.12 of PMGSY. 45.80
Carriage of materials
Bitumen 0.00065 MTx 702.40 Rs. 0.46
chips 0.009 m3x 527.41 Rs. 4.75
Finished rate per m3 Rs. 51.00

17.0 Providing and erecting direction and place

identification retro reflectorised sign -do-

do- Basic Rate Vide item no.8.5 of PMGSY. Each Rs. 10133.33

18.0 Painting lines , dashes, arrows etc. on roads

in two coats on new surface Basic Rate Vide item no.8.11 of PMGSY. Per m2 Rs. 52.52

19.0 Road marking with hot applied

thermoplastic compound with reflectorising

glass beads on bituminous surface Basic Rate Vide item no.8.13 of PMGSY. Per m2 Rs. 387.84

20.0 supplying and installation of

delineators(road way indicaters,hazard

markers,object markers,) -do-do-

 supplying and installation of

delineators(road way indicaters,hazard

markers,object markers,) -do-do- Basic Rate Vide item no.8.15 of PMGSY. Each Rs. 532.27
26.0 providing and fixing at site precast F.I.
post Item no. 8.14 of PMGSY

(i) 5th kilometre stone (precast) 3169.49

(ii) Ordinary Kilometer stone (Precast) 1871.41
(iii) Hectometer stone (Precast) 563.75

17.0 Providing and laying Pitching on slopes laid over well prepared
filter media
Basic rate vide item no.14.5(A) of PMGSY. per m2 Rs. 1374.000
Carriage of boulders
1.2 m3 x Rs. 546.79 Rs. 656.14
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 2030.14
18.0 Providing and laying filter material underneath pitching
Basic rate vide item no.14.6 of PMGSY per m2 Rs. 1927.02
Carriage of metal
1.2 m3 x Rs. 566.16 = Rs. 679.40
Finished rate per m3 = Rs. 2606.42

19.0 Stone masonry work in cement mortar 1:3 for Basic Rate Rs. 3101.44
Random Rubble Masonry in 1:3 cement mortar cement Mortar 0.33 m3 430.36 Rs. 142.02
Item No. 11.6 iii Boulder 1.1 m3 546.79 Rs. 601.46
Rs. 3844.92
30.0 Stone masonry work in cement mortar 1:3 for Basic Rate Rs. 3257.45
Random Rubble Masonry in substructur cement 0.51 MT 430.36 Rs. 219.48
Item No. 13.4 A Sand 1.05 m3 546.79 Rs. 574.13
Rs. 4091.57
31.0 Plain/Reinforced cement concrete in sub-structure
Structure PCC Grade M15 13.5A(p) Basic Rate Rs. 4104.53
carriage Rs. 744.12
Finished Rate Rs. 4897.14

32.0 Laying Reinforced Cement Concrete Pipe

1200 dia Np4 pipe PMGSY 9.2 B Basic Rate Rs. 6505.00
In single row Sand 0.0072 x 546.79 Rs. 3.94
Chips 0.40 x 527.41 Rs. 210.96
Cement 0.0056 x 430.36 Rs. 2.41
H.P. 1 x 0.00 Rs. 0.00
Rs. 6789.53

33.0 Flexible Apron :Construction of flexible apron 1 m thick Basic Rs. 639.00
comprising of loose stone boulders weighing not less than 40 kg Boulder 1 546.79 Rs. 546.7861
beyond curtain wall. Rs. 1197.64

34 Fillling in foundation trenches as per drawing and

Sand filling Basic Rate Vide item no.8.13 of PMGSY. Per m2 639.00
Sand 1.2 x 546.79 Rs. 656.14
Rs. 1295.14
Pointing with cement mortar (1:3) on brickwork/stone
35 as per drawing and technical specification Clauses
Basic Rate Vide item no.12.20 of PMGSY. Per m2 56.56

Plastering with cement mortar (1:4), 15 mm thick on

36 brickwork/stone in substructure as per technical
Basic Rate Vide item no.12.30 of PMGSY. Per m2 125.26
 Appendix A
NEW TECHNOLOGY-PLASTIC

Reference to
Sr. Rate
MORD Description Unit Quantity Amount (Rs.)
No. (Rs.)
Specifications

A.3.1.5 Suggestive B Bituminous concrete Grading- II (RCD-5.19B) using waste Plastic

Providing and laying bituminous concrete ( replacing bitumen by
8% with waste plastic ) with higher capacity batch type hot mix
plant using crushed aggregates of specified grading, premixed
with bituminous binder @5.4 percent of mix and filler, transporting
the hot mix to work site, laying with a hydrostatic paver finisher
with sensor control to the required grade, level and alignment ,
rolling with smooth wheeled, vibratory and tandem rollers to
achieve the desired compaction as per MORT&H specification
clause no. 507 complete in all respects.
Unit= cum
Taking output= 191 cum

a) Labour
Mate day 0.440 342.43 150.67
Mazdoor day 6.000 326.85 1961.10
Mazdoor skilled day 5.000 451.39 2256.95
b) Machinery
HMP 120 TPH hour 5.008 10360.00 51882.88
Mechanical broom (2.1m sweeping width) hour 1.624 405.00 657.72
Air compressor 250 cfm hour 1.624 335.00 544.04
Paver (174 HP) hour 5.008 900.00 4507.20
Electric generator 250 KVA hour 5.008 6900.00 34555.20
Front end loader for feeding the plant 1 Cum Capacity hour 15.553 610.00 9487.33
Tipper for transportation 10 Cum Capacity [Link] 450.76xL1 5.43 2447.63
Tipper for loading & Unloading time 10 Cum Capacity hour 10.017 1424.00 14264.21
Smooth steel wheeled tandem roller for static and vibratory passages hour 16.902 1250.00 21127.50
Pneumatic tyre roller hour 4.007 1295.00 5189.07
c) Material

(i)Bitumen @ 4.97% of mix = (Bitumen @ 5.40% x92% )

(Weight of mix = 450.76 t , =>Wt of Bitumen @ 5.4% = 24.34t) tonne 22.39 56078.00 1255642.50

(ii) Processed Waste Plastic i.e 8% of 23.44 t bitumen = 1.95 t tonne 1.95 28000.00 54600.00
iii) Aggregate
Total weight of mix = 450.76tonnes

Weight of bitumen + plastic= 24.34 tonnes

Weight of aggregate = 426.42 tonnes

Taking density of aggregate= 1.5 tonne/ cum

*Grading II 13mm (Nominal size)

13.2 - 10 mm 21 per cent cum 59.699 1015.00 60594.49
10 - 5 mm 17 per cent cum 48.327 991.00 47892.06
5 mm and below 60 per cent cum 170.568 585.00 99782.28
Filler @ 2 per cent of weight of aggregates. tonne 8.528 4800.00 40934.40
d) Overheads & Contractor's Profit @ 12.5 % on (a+b+c) 2,13,559.65

Cost of 191 cum = a+b+c+d 19,22,036.86

Rate per cum = a+b+c+d/191 10,063.02
e) Carrriage cost

(i)Bitumen @ 4.97% of mix = (Bitumen @

5.40% x92% )
(Weight of mix = 450.76 t , =>Wt of Bitumen @ tonne 0.117 702.40 82.34
5.4% = 24.34t)
(ii) Processed Waste Plastic i.e 8% of 23.44
t bitumen = 1.95 t tonne 0.010 702.40 7.17
 13.2 - 10 mm 21 per cent cum 0.313 566.16 176.96
10 - 5 mm 17 per cent cum 0.253 566.16 143.25
5 mm and below 60 per cent cum 0.893 566.16 505.60
Filler @ 2 per cent of weight of aggregates. tonne 0.045 430.36 19.22
934.54
Rate per cum = a+b+c+d+e TOTAL COST OF BC :- 10997.56

[Link] of Bitumen has been taken for analysis purpose. The

Note actual quantity will depend upon job mix formula.

2. Labour for traffic control, watch and ward and other

miscellaneous duties at site including sundries have been
included in administrative overheads of the contractor.

3. In case BC is laid over freshly laid tack coat, provision of

Mechanical broom and 2 mazdoors shall be deleted as the same
has been included in the cost of tack coat.
4. The average density of 1.5 tonne/cum is only a refrence density
in this data book.
5. The individual percentage of aggregates should be calculated
from the total weight of dry aggregates i.e. excluding the weight of
bitumen. The weight of filler will also be 2 percent by weight of dry
aggregates.

A.3.1.2 504 Bituminous Macadam using waste Plastic

Providing and laying bituminous macadam( replacing bitumen by 8% with waste
plastic ) with hot mix plant using crushed aggregates of grading as per Table 500.4
premixed with bituminous binder, transported to site upto a lead of 1000 m laid over a
previously prepared surface with paver finisher to the required grade, level and
alignment and rolled to achieve the desired compaction as per Technical
Specification Clause 504.
Unit = cum
Taking output = 102.5 cum (225 t)
a) Labour
Mate day 0.52 342.43 178.06
Mazdoor (Unskilled) day 10.00 326.85 3,268.50
Mazdoor (Skilled) day 3.00 451.39 1,354.17
b) Machinery
Batch mix HMP 40-60 THP @ 40 t per hour actual output hour 6.00 9,000.00 54,000.00
Hydraulic broom @ 1250 sqm per hour hour 1.10 405.00 445.50
Air compressor 210 cfm hour 1.10 270.00 297.00
Paver finisher hour 6.00 900.00 5,400.00
Generator 125 KVA hour 6.00 3,200.00 19,200.00
Front end loader 1 cum bucket capacity hour 6.00 1,010.00 6,060.00
Tipper 5.5 cum, 10 t capacity hour 6.21 1,150.00 7,141.50
Three wheel 80-100 kN static roller for intial break down
hour 12.00 650.00 7,800.00
rolling, final and finishing rolling
Vibratory roller 80-100 kN for intermediate rolling hour 6.00 680.00 4,080.00
c) Material
i) Bitumen @ 3.036 %of mix = (Bitumen @ 3.3
%x92% ) t 6.83 56,078.000 3,83,068.82
(Weight of mix = 225 t , =>Wt of Bitumen @
ii) 3.3% = 7.425t)
Processed Waste Plastic i.e 8% of 7.425 t
t 0.59 28000.00 16,632.00
bitumen = 0 .594 t
iii) Aggregate
Total weight of mix = 225 t
Weight of bitumen + Plastic = 7.425 t
Weight of aggregate = 225 – 7.425 = 217.575 t
Taking density of aggregate = 1.5 t/cum
Volume of aggregate = 145.05 cum
(19 mm nominal size)
25 -10 mm - 40 per cent cum 58.02 1,195.00 69,333.90
10– 5 mm - 40 per cent cum 58.02 991.00 57,497.82
d) 5 mm and below - 20 per cent cum 29.01 585.00 16,970.85
Overheads & Contractor's Profit @ 12.5 % on (a+b+c) 81,591.02
 Cost of 102.5 cum = a+b+c+d 7,34,319.14
Rate per cum = a+b+c+d/102.5 7,164.09
e) Carrriage cost
Bitumen @ 3.036 %of mix = (Bitumen @ 3.3
%x92% )
(Weight of mix = 225 t , =>Wt of Bitumen @ t 0.067 702.40 46.81
3.3% = 7.425t)
Processed Waste Plastic i.e 8% of 7.425 t
bitumen = 0 .594 t t 0.006 702.40 4.07

25 -10 mm - 40 per cent cum 0.566 566.16 320.48

10– 5 mm - 40 per cent cum 0.566 566.16 320.48
5 mm and below - 20 per cent cum 0.283 566.16 160.24
852.07
TOTAL COST OF BM:- 8016.16
Although the rollers are required only for 3 hours as per norms of
output, but the same have to be available at site for six hours as
the hot mix plant and paver will take six hours for mixing and
Note: 1
paving the output of 225 t considered in these analysis. To cater
for the idle period of these rollers, their usage rates may be
multiplied by a factor of 0.65.

Quantity of bitumen has been taken for analysis purpose. The

2
actual quantity will depend upon job mix formula.

Labour for traffic control, watch and ward and other

3 miscellaneous duties at site, including sundries have been
included in administrative overheads of the contractor.
In case BM is laid over freshly laid tack coat, provision of
4 Hydraulic broom and 2 mazdoor for the same shall be detected
as the same has been included in the cost of tack coat.
Analysis is based on 1000 m lead of mixed material. Cost of
5
additional cartage may be added as per site requirements.
A.3.1.3 508 Semi-Dense Bituminous Concrete using Waste Plastic
Providing and laying semi dense bituminous concrete ( replacing bitumen
by 8% with waste plastic ) with 100-120 TPH batch type HMP producing an
average output of 75 tonnes per hour using crushed aggregates of specified
grading, premixed with bituminous binder @ 4.5 to 5 per cent of mix and
filler, transporting the hot mix to work site, laying with a hydrostatic paver
finisher with sensor control to the required grade, level and alignment,
rolling with smooth wheeled, vibratory and tandem rollers to achieve the
desired compaction as per MoRTH specification clause No. 508 complete in
all respects.
Unit = cum
Taking output = 195 cum (450 t)
a) Labour
Mate day 0.84 342.43 287.64
Mazdoor working with HMP, mechanical broom, paver,
roller, asphalt cutter and assistance for setting out lines, day 16.00 326.85 5,229.60
levels and layout of construction
Skilled mazdoor for checking line & levels day 5.00 451.39 2,256.95
b) Machinery 0.00
Batch mix HMP 100-120 TPH @ 75 tonne per hour
hour 6.00 9,000.00 54,000.00
actual output
Paver finisher hydrostatic with sensor control @ 75 cum per hour hour 6.000 900.00 5,400.00
Generator 250 KVA hour 6 6,900.00 41,400.00
Front end loader 1 cum bucket capacity hour 6 1,010.00 6,060.00
Tipper 10 tonne capacity [Link] 450 x L 3.00 1,350.00
Add 10 per cent of cost of carriage to cover cost of
10.00% 135.00
loading and unloading
Smooth wheeled roller 8-10 tonnes for initial break down rolling. hour 6.00x0.65* 650.00 2,535.00
Vibratory roller 8 tonnes for intermediate rolling. hour 6.00x0.65* 680.00 2,652.00
Finish rolling with 6-8 tonnes smooth wheeled tandem roller. hour 6.00x0.65* 1,250.00 4,875.00
* Grading
(I) I: 13 mm (Nominal Size)
c) Material
 i) Bitumen @ 4.14% of mix = (Bitumen @ 4.5%
x92% )
tonne 18.63 56,078.00 10,44,733.14
(Weight of mix = 450t , =>Wt of Bitumen @
4.5% = 20.25t)
ii) Processed Waste Plastic i.e 8% of 20.25 t
tonne 1.62 28,000.00 45,360.00
bitumen = 1.62 t
iii) Aggregate
Total weight of mix =450 t
Weight of bitumen +Plastic = 20.250 t
Weight of aggregate = 450-20.25 = 429.75 t
Taking density of aggregate = 1.5 ton/cum
Volume of aggregate =286.5 cum
13.2 - 10 mm 20 per cent cum 57.3 1,015.00 58,159.50
10 - 5 mm 38 per cent cum 108.87 991.00 1,07,890.17
5 mm and below 40 per cent cum 114.6 585.00 67,041.00
Filler @ 2 per cent of weight of aggregates. tonne 8.62 4,800.00 41,376.00
Overheads &d)Contractor's Profit @ 12.5 % on (a+b+c) 1,86,342.63

Cost of 195 cum = a+b+c+d 16,77,083.63

Rate per cum = a+b+c+d/195 8,600.43
Grading
(II) II: 10 mm (Nominal Size)
c) Material
i) Bitumen @ 4.60% of mix = (Bitumen @ 5.0%
x92% )
tonne 20.70 56,078.00 11,60,814.60
(Weight of mix = 450t , =>Wt of Bitumen @
5.0% = 22.5t)
ii) Processed Waste Plastic i.e 8% of 22.5 t
tonne 1.80 28,000.00 50,400.00
bitumen = 1.80 t
iii) Aggregate
Total weight of mix =450 t
Weight of bitumen + Plastic = 22.50 t
Weight of aggregate = 450-22.50 = 427.5 t
Taking density of aggregate = 1.5 ton/cum
Volume of aggregate =285.00 cum
9.5 - 4.75 mm@ 57 per cent cum 162.45 991.00 1,60,987.95
4.75 and below@ 41 per cent cum 116.85 585.00 68,357.25
Filler @ 2 per cent of weight of aggregates. tonne 8.62 4,800.00 41,376.00
Overheads &d)Contractor's Profit @ 12.5 % on (a+b+c) 1,94,714.62

Cost of 195 cum = a+b+c+d 18,02,831.62

Rate per cum = a+b+c+d/195 9,245.29
Carriage cost
Bitumen @ 4.60% of mix = (Bitumen @ 5.0%
x92% )
tonne 0.106 702.40 74.56
(Weight of mix = 450t , =>Wt of Bitumen @
5.0% = 22.5t)
Processed Waste Plastic i.e 8% of 22.5 t
tonne 0.009 702.40 6.48
bitumen = 1.80 t
9.5 - 4.75 mm@ 57 per cent cum 0.833 566.16 471.66
4.75 and below@ 41 per cent cum 0.599 566.16 339.26
Filler @ 2 per cent of weight of aggregates. tonne 0.044 430.36 19.02
910.99
TOTAL COST SDBC GR II :- 10156.28
Note 1 Although the rollers are required only for 3 hours as per norms of
output, but the same have to be available at site for six hours as
the hot mix plant and paver will take six hours for mixing and
paving the output of 450 tonnes considered in this analysis. To
cater for the idle period of these rollers, their usage rates have
been multiplied by a factor of 0.65

2 Quantity of Bitumen has been taken for analysis purpose. The

actual quantity will depend upon job mix formula.
3 Labour for traffic control, watch and ward and other
miscellaneous duties at site including sundries have been
included in administrative overheads of the contractor.
 4 In case SDBC is laid over freshly laid tack coat, provision of
broom and 2 mazdoor shall be deleted as the same has been
included in the cost of tack coat.
5 The quantity of Bitumen to be adjusted as per job mix formula.
A.7.8 401 Granular Sub-base with Well Graded Material (Table 400.1)
Suggestive (A) By Mix in Place Method
Construction of granular sub-base by providing well graded
material, spreading in uniform layers with motor grader / Tractor
mount grader on prepared surface, mixing by mix in place method
with rotavator at OMC, and compacting with smooth wheel roller
to achieve the desired density, complete as per Technical
Specification Clause 401.
(ii) For Grading II*Material
Unit= cum
Taking output= 300 cum
a) Labour
Mate day 0.48 342.43 164.37
Mazdoor (Skilled) day 2.00 451.39 902.78
Mazdoor (Unskilled) day 10.00 326.85 3,268.50
b) Machinery
Tractor Mounted Grader @ 25 cum per hour hour 12.00 1,350.00 16,200.00
Three wheel 80-100 kN static roller @ 10 cum per hour hour 30.00 650.00 19,500.00
Tractor with Rotavator 25 cum per hour hour 12.00 260.00 3,120.00
Water tanker 6 kl capacity hour 5.00 610.00 3,050.00
c) Material
Well graded granular sub-base material as per Table 400.1 cum 360.00 0.00
53 mm to 26.5 mm @ 12.5 per cent cum 45.00 1,085.00 48,825.00
26.5 mm to 9.5 mm @ 22.5 per cent cum 81.00 1,135.00 91,935.00
9.5 mm to 2.36 mm @ 25 per cent cum 90.00 1,015.00 91,350.00
2.36 mm below @ 40 per cent cum 144.00 290.00 41,760.00
Water kl 30.00 10.00 300.00
d) Overheads & Contractor's Profit @ 12.5 %on (a+b+c) 40,046.96

Cost for 300 cum= a+b+c+d 3,60,422.60

Rate per cum = (a+b+c+d)/300 1,201.41
Carriage cost
53 mm to 26.5 mm @ 12.5 per cent cum 0.150 566.16 84.925

26.5 mm to 9.5 mm @ 22.5 per cent cum 0.270 566.16 152.864

9.5 mm to 2.36 mm @ 25 per cent cum 0.300 566.16 169.849

2.36 mm below @ 40 per cent cum 0.480 289.28 138.854

546.493
Rate per cum = (a+b+c+d)/300 TOTAL COST GSB GR II :- 1747.90
 A
REPORT ON
SOIL INVESTIGATION WORK

FOR

Construction of HL Bridge at Chainaige 9800m, on

road T07-Osam(T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru,
Chirwabeda over local Nala under Petarwar Block,
Bokarao District

CLIENT:

The Executive Engineer,

Jharkhand State Rural Road
Development Authority

CONSULTANT

MARS PLANNING AND ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LTD

 CONTENTS

Section Page

1.0 Introduction

2.0 Field Exploration

2.1 Boring

2.2 Sampling

2.3 Standard Penetration Test

2.4 Measurement of Water Table

3.0 Laboratory Testing

4.0 Soil Profile and Properties

5.0 Hydrogeology

6.0 Discussions on Foundation

7.0 Recommendations
APPENDIX

1 Bore log Sheet

2 Laboratory Test Results of Soil Samples

3 Laboratory Test Results of Rock Samples
4 Sub-Soil Profile
1. Introduction :

Soil exploration, investigation and testing of soil samples for Construction of HL Bridge at Chainaige
9800m, on road T07-Osam(T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda over local Nala under
Petarwar Block, Bokarao District Was entrusted to MARS PLANNING AND ENGINEERING SERVICED PVT.
LTD. The objective was to ascertain the subsoil characteristics and stratification and other necessary data
of soil condition of the site for the proposed Bridge. The soil investigates work consisted of the following
operations:

(i) Sinking Five (5) nos. Bore holes varying in depths up to a maximum depth of 10.5.00M
below the existing ground level at various locations including collection of undisturbed /
disturbed soil samples and conducting Standard Penetration Tests at specified depths.

(ii) Drilling Sx&Nx size borehole in refusal strata (N>100) in continuation of, including visual
identification, collection and preservation of rock (including boulder) core samples in
core boxes and determination of core recovery and RQD.

(iii) Reporting of formation at the site for various layers present at their respectively depths
along with their thickness including location of ground water table.

During sinking of bore holes soil samples in disturbed and undisturbed conditions and rock core samples
were collected for laboratory tests. The disturbed samples were subjected to tests to obtain soil index
properties. The undisturbed soil samples, however, were used mainly for conducting tests to obtain shear
strength parameters as well as consolidation characteristics of the soil representing the strata.

Since the investigation could not cover the regional sub-soil features, due weightage for the variations of
sub-surface layers in its horizontal and vertical extent is to be given in selecting design basis. The
consultant has prepared this report based on the field work and the samples collected from the site by the
site in-charge.

2. Field :

Geotechnical Investigation was envisaged in an attempt for optimization in the design of foundation for
the proposed structures to be constructed at this site. The entire Investigation programmed had been
divided mainly into two parts, (I) Field works & (II) Laboratory Tests.

(i) Field works unfold the sub-surface deposit types and their characteristics

(ii) Laboratory tests part would help determining the relevant physical and geotechnical
properties of the sub-surface deposits leading to finalization of foundation depths of the
structures and the bearing capacity with particular reference to the sub-surface types
and their strength parameters and settlement potentials at the site.

A list of the boreholes with the terminating depth and standing water level are presented in a tabular form
below:

Terminating Depth R.L. of Borehole Date of Date of

Bore Hole No.
(m) Top Commencement completion
99.742
BH – 1 10.50 18.06.2021 18.06.2021
97.316
BH – 2 10.50 19.06.2021 19.06.2021

1
 96.540
BH - 3 10.50 20.06.2021 20.06.2021
96.819
BH -4 10.50 21.06.2021 21.06.2021
99.721
BH -5 10.50 22.06.2021 22.06.2021

The Borehole location plan has been enclosed in Appendix-I.

Boring:

Boring was carried out by auger and rotary method as per IS 1892-1979 to sink nominal 150mm diameter
boreholes to desired depths and operated by a team of experienced technicians. Flush jointed seamless
casings were used to stabilize the boreholes and prevent caving of the soil inside the boreholes. The casing
pipes were advanced by turning in order to minimize the disturbance. Undisturbed soil samples were
collected at suitable intervals or at change of strata whichever is met earlier by open drive sampling
method since it was intended to ascertain the subsoil characteristics. The standing water table in each
borehole was determined at least 24 hours after the termination of boring work.

For the boreholes when rock was encountered rotary core drilling technique was adopted down to the
explored depth. Drilling was done with standard gravity operated rotary drilling machine as per IS: 6926-
1973. In this method the hole was advanced by rotating a system, consisting of series of hollow drill rods
to the bottom of which was attached a double tube core barrel with a diamond coring bit, means of a
diesel operated engine. When the rod with the coring bit was rotated, downward pressure was applied to
the system to obtain penetration in the rocky strata and water under pressure was introduced into the
bottom of the hole through the hollow drill rods. Water comes up through the annular space between the
drill rods and the bore hole and was collected in the water sump, from where it was re-circulated. Water
serves the dual function of cooling the bit as it enters the hole and carrying the cuttings from the bottom
of the bore hole on its return journey to the surface.

Seamless flush jointed steel casing of Sx and Nx sizes were used to prevent any caving and water loss from
holes and they were inserted simultaneously with the advancement of boring / drilling operations.

Sampling:

Nominal 100mm diameter undisturbed samples were recovered. The sampling equipment used consists of
a two-tier assembly of sample tubes 400mm in length fitted at its ower end. The sampling assembly was
driven by means of a jarring link to its full length or as far down as was found practicable. After withdrawal
the ends of the tubes were sealed with wax at both ends and capped before transmission to the
laboratory. At close intervals in depth, disturbed samples were collected both from split spoon sampler
after the standard penetration test and from cutting edge for identification and logging purpose. These
were tagged and packed in polythene packets and transported to the laboratory. The depth wise locations
of all the undisturbed and disturbed samples were used in the preparation of borehole log data and for
general identification and classification purposes.

The details of boring are presented in the Appendix-II in the form of bore log sheets.

Standard Penetration Test:

2
Standard Penetration Tests were conducted in the boreholes at suitable intervals as per IS: 2131-1963
using a split spoon sampler. The split spoon sampler used is of a standard design having an outer diameter
of 50.8 mm and inner diameter of 35mm, driving with a monkey weighing 63.5 Kgs, falling freely from a
height of 75 cm. A record of the number of blows required to penetrate every 15 cm to a maximum depth
of 45 cm was made. The first 15 cm of drive was considered to be seating drive and was neglected. To
total blows required to effect each 15 cm of penetration was recorded. The “N” values were obtained by
counting the number of blows required to drive the spoon 15 cm to 45 cm. On completion of a test the
split spoon sampler was opened and soil specimens were preserved in polythene bags for logging purpose.

All the boreholes were sunk with winch. However, raising of hammer for SPT was done manually. Hence
there will not be any inertia loss and the efficiency of hammer blows should be considered as 100%.

Measurement of Water Table:

Level of water was noted when struck in. This is termed as observed water level. Standing water level was
noted during initial stages of boring, intermediate stage of boring and after 24 hours of removal of casing
was also noted and shown in the profile.

3. Laboratory Testing:
For proper identification and classification of the sub-soil deposits and for deriving adequate information
regarding its relevant physical and geotechnical properties at the site under investigation, the soil samples
from the sampling tubes were extracted in the laboratory by pushing out the core by using the extractor
frame. The core was jacked out in a direction that corresponded with the soil movement within the tube
during sampling. In general, the following laboratory tests were conducted on the soil samples collected
from the exploratory bore holes and sampling points:

a) Visual Engineering Classification

b) Grain size analysis (Sieve as well as Hydrometer)

c) Consistency Limits.

d) Determination of Natural Moisture Content (Water content).

e) Determination of Specific Gravity.

f) Determination of Bulk & Dry Unit Weight.

g) Direct Shear Test

h) Tri-axial test (Unconsolidated un-drained).

The following tests were carried out in Rock Samples:

(i) Specific Gravity

(ii) Water Absorption

(iii) Crushing Strength.

3
Laboratory Soil test report has been given in Appendix-III.

Laboratory Rock test report has been given in Appendix-IV.

4. Soil Profile and Properties :

Based on visual classification and results of field and laboratory tests on the samples recovered the
proposed site may be divided into the following major soil strata as described below:

Layer Details
Stratum

Average Field N
No.

Reduced Level (m)

Description Value
From To

1 Sand With Fines 0.0 7 18

2
Soft Rock 7.0 10.5 >100

Subsoil profile has been given in Appendix-V.

5. Hydrogeology:

The ground water table at the site was found to exist at 95.540 to 101.070 (R.L.) for the boreholes
explored during the time of investigation work.

6. Discussions on Foundation:

In view of the sub-soil formation encountered in the area of Bridge, open foundations in terms of isolated
footings may be provided for A-1, P-1 to P-3, &A-2 embedment into hard rock.

The boring has been conducted at 5 locations, however the foundation type and depth of foundation for
all 5 no’s of foundations has been provided based upon the bore log of 5 locations, as similar type of sub
soil strata has been encountered at all 5 locations, representing the true behavior of river bed.

The boring has been conducted at A-1, P-1 to P-3, & A-2 locations.

4
Recommendations:

Based upon the above discussion the proposed foundation level has been given as below:

1 Open Foundation:

Existing Ground Depth of Safe Bearing

level R.L. of Foundation Foundation (in Capacity (in
Borehole Number level of Proposed Meter) T/m2)
Open Foundation

99.742 91.242 8.50 41.38

BH – 1
97.316 89.316 8.00 40.29
BH – 2
96.540 89.040 7.50 43.02
BH - 3
96.819 88.819 8.00 42.46
BH -4
9.721 91.221 8.50 43.46
BH -5

The net allowable Bearing capacities for rock have been computed as per IS: 12070-1987, as given in
laboratory test report of rock, which has been given as under Appendix-IV.

5
APPENDIX-I
 BORE LOG DATA SHEET BH NO.-1

Construction of HL Bridge at Chainaige 9800m, on road T07-

The Executive Engineer, Jharkhand State Rural Road
SITE: Osam(T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda over Client:
Development Authority, Bokaro
local Nala under Petarwar Block, Bokarao District

Type of Boring
Rotary Job No. :

Dia of Hole (mm): 150mm BH-1

Bore Hole No. :

Depth (M): 10.50 Co-ordinates:

Commenced on: 18.06.2021 Completed on: 18.06.2021 Ground Bed RL: 102.670

Ground Water: 101.070

SPT Record
Sample Ref. Core Revry
Description of Strata NOTATION Symbol From (M) To (M) R.Q.D.
No. (%)
0-150 150-300 300-450 N

0.00 0.50 DS DS-1

0.50 1.50 1 1 1 2 SPT-1

1.50 3.00 2 3 6 9 SPT-2

Sand With Fines SM
3.00 4.00 4 5 9 14 SPT-3

4.00 5.50 13 25 39 64 SPT-4

5.50 7.00 15 28 45 100 CR-1 10 NIL

7.00 8.50 101 - - 100 CR-2 15 NIL

Soft Rock
8.50 10.50 102 - - 100 CR-3 18 NIL

Bore Hole Terminated at : 10.5 M

 BORE LOG DATA SHEET BH NO.-1

Construction of HL Bridge at Chainaige 9800m, on road T07-

The Executive Engineer, Jharkhand State Rural Road
SITE: Osam(T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda over Client:
Development Authority, Bokaro
local Nala under Petarwar Block, Bokarao District

Type of Boring
Rotary Job No. :

Dia of Hole (mm): 150mm BH-2

Bore Hole No. :

Depth (M): 10.50 Co-ordinates:

Commenced on: 19.06.2021 Completed on: 19.06.2021 Ground Bed RL: 102.670

Ground Water: 101.070

SPT Record
Sample Ref. Core Revry
Description of Strata NOTATION Symbol From (M) To (M) R.Q.D.
No. (%)
0-150 150-300 300-450 N

0.00 0.50 DS DS-1

0.50 1.50 1 1 1 2 SPT-1

Sand With Fines SM 1.50 3.00 1 2 6 8 SPT-2

3.00 4.00 3 5 7 12 SPT-3

4.00 6.00 14 30 42 72 SPT-4

6.00 7.50 100 - - 100 CR-1 14 NIL

Soft Rock 7.00 9.00 101 - - 100 CR-2 18 NIL

9.00 10.50 102 - - 100 CR-3 22 NIL

Bore Hole Terminated at : 10.5 M

 BORE LOG DATA SHEET BH NO.-3

Construction of HL Bridge at Chainaige 9800m, on road T07-

The Executive Engineer, Jharkhand State Rural Road
SITE: Osam(T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda over Client:
Development Authority, Bokaro
local Nala under Petarwar Block, Bokarao District

Type of Boring
Rotary Job No. :

Dia of Hole (mm): 150mm BH-3

Bore Hole No. :

Depth (M): 10.50 Co-ordinates:

Commenced on: 20.06.2021 Completed on: 20.06.2021 Ground Bed RL: 102.670

Ground Water: 101.070

SPT Record
Sample Ref. Core Revry
Description of Strata NOTATION Symbol From (M) To (M) R.Q.D.
No. (%)
0-150 150-300 300-450 N

0.00 0.50 DS DS-1

0.50 1.50 0 1 1 2 SPT-1

Sand With Fines SM 1.50 3.00 2 3 6 9 SPT-2

3.00 4.00 4 6 7 13 SPT-3

4.00 5.50 16 32 45 77 SPT-4

5.50 7.50 100 - - 100 CR-1 13 NIL

Soft Rock 7.00 9.00 101 - - 100 CR-2 20 NIL

9.00 10.50 102 - - 100 CR-3 21 NIL

Bore Hole Terminated at : 10.5 M

 BORE LOG DATA SHEET BH NO.-3

Construction of HL Bridge at Chainaige 9800m, on road T07-

The Executive Engineer, Jharkhand State Rural Road
SITE: Osam(T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda over Client:
Development Authority, Bokaro
local Nala under Petarwar Block, Bokarao District

Type of Boring
Rotary Job No. :

Dia of Hole (mm): 150mm BH-4

Bore Hole No. :

Depth (M): 11.00 Co-ordinates:

Commenced on: 21.06.2021 Completed on: 21.06.2021 Ground Bed RL: 102.670

Ground Water: 101.070

SPT Record
Sample Ref. Core Revry
Description of Strata NOTATION Symbol From (M) To (M) R.Q.D.
No. (%)
0-150 150-300 300-450 N

0.00 0.50 DS DS-1

0.50 1.50 0 1 1 2 SPT-1

Sand With Fines SM 1.50 3.00 2 3 6 9 SPT-2

3.00 4.00 4 6 7 13 SPT-3

4.00 6.00 16 32 45 77 SPT-4

6.00 8.00 100 - - 100 CR-1 22 NIL

Soft Rock 8.00 9.50 101 - - 100 CR-2 24 NIL

9.50 11.00 102 - - 100 CR-3 26 NIL

Bore Hole Terminated at : 11 M

 BORE LOG DATA SHEET BH NO.-5

Construction of HL Bridge at Chainaige 9800m, on road T07-

The Executive Engineer, Jharkhand State Rural Road
SITE: Osam(T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda over Client:
Development Authority, Bokaro
local Nala under Petarwar Block, Bokarao District

Type of Boring
Rotary Job No. :

Dia of Hole (mm): 150mm BH-3

Bore Hole No. :

Depth (M): 10.50 Co-ordinates:

Commenced on: 22.06.2021 Completed on: 22.06.2021 Ground Bed RL: 102.670

Ground Water: 101.070

SPT Record
Sample Ref. Core Revry
Description of Strata NOTATION Symbol From (M) To (M) R.Q.D.
No. (%)
0-150 150-300 300-450 N

0.00 0.50 DS DS-1

0.50 1.50 0 1 1 2 SPT-1

1.50 3.00 2 3 6 9 SPT-2

Sand With Fines SM
3.00 4.00 4 6 7 13 SPT-3

4.00 6.00 12 30 40 70 SPT-4

6.00 7.00 16 32 45 77 CR-1 18 NIL

Soft Rock 7.00 9.00 101 - - 100 CR-2 20 NIL

9.00 10.50 102 - - 100 CR-3 26 NIL

Bore Hole Terminated at : 10.5 M

APPENDIX-II
 MARS PLANNING AND ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT LTD.
LABORATORY TEST REPORT OF SOIL SAMPLES

Construction of HL Bridge at Chainaige 9800m, on road T07-Osam(T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda over local Nala under Petarwar
Block, Bokarao District
Moisture Specific Bulk Dry
SAMPLE DEPTH GRAIN SIZE Consistency Limit C Ф
Content Gravity Density Density
NO. BELOW GL. >4.75 2.36 1.18 0.60 0.30 0.15 0.075 <0.075 LL PL PI (%) (Kg/cm2) (degree) (g/cc) (g/cc)
BH-1
1 1.50 0.50 2.00 6.00 18.50 25.50 35.50 3.50 8.50 29.65 NP NP 10.65 1.56 0.0058 29.18 1.81 1.64
2 3.00 0.50 1.00 4.50 21.00 35.00 18.00 8.50 11.50 28.74 NP NP 9.84 1.64 0.0042 27.49 1.84 1.68
3 4.00 1.00 3.50 10.00 19.50 28.00 26.00 6.00 6.00 31.00 NP NP 8.55 1.55 0.0059 28.47 1.83 1.69
4 5.50 0.50 3.50 10.00 16.00 31.00 25.00 7.00 7.00 32.00 NP NP 8.35 1.54 0.0058 28.39 1.79 1.65
5 7.00 0.50 3.00 10.50 17.00 30.00 24.00 6.00 9.00 32.00 NP NP 8.35 1.54 0.0058 28.39 1.79 1.65
BH-2
1 2.00 1.00 1.50 5.00 19.00 26.00 36.00 5.00 6.50 29.65 NP NP 10.32 1.57 0.0056 30.20 1.82 1.65
2 4.00 1.50 2.00 5.50 22.00 40.00 16.00 7.00 6.00 28.74 NP NP 9.52 1.60 0.0046 28.00 1.83 1.67
3 4.50 1.00 3.50 10.00 19.50 28.00 26.00 6.00 6.00 31.00 NP NP 9.00 1.62 0.0061 28.50 1.80 1.65
4 6.00 0.50 4.00 11.00 18.00 32.00 23.00 3.50 8.00 32.00 NP NP 8.50 1.58 0.0058 28.20 1.78 1.64
BH-3
1 3.00 1.00 2.00 5.50 18.00 26.00 32.00 6.50 9.00 30.00 NP NP 10.80 1.58 0.0055 29.12 1.86 1.68
2 4.00 1.50 2.00 5.50 22.00 40.00 16.00 7.00 6.00 28.65 NP NP 9.52 1.62 0.0044 27.50 1.82 1.66
3 4.00 2.50 2.00 5.00 21.00 25.50 31.00 7.00 6.00 30.50 NP NP 8.55 1.58 0.0061 28.45 1.89 1.74
4 5.50 0.50 4.00 11.00 18.00 32.00 23.00 3.50 8.00 31.00 NP NP 8.40 1.53 0.0052 29.00 1.81 1.67
BH-4
1 3.00 0.50 2.50 5.50 18.00 26.00 32.00 6.50 9.00 28.65 NP NP 10.65 1.58 0.0056 28.00 1.82 1.64
2 4.00 2.00 1.50 5.50 21.00 41.00 16.00 7.00 6.00 29.12 NP NP 9.84 1.62 0.0400 29.60 1.85 1.68
3 5.00 5.00 2.00 4.00 20.00 26.00 30.00 7.00 6.00 31.00 NP NP 8.55 1.56 0.0580 29.54 1.86 1.71
4 6.00 0.50 4.00 11.00 18.00 32.00 23.00 3.50 8.00 31.50 NP NP 8.35 1.58 0.0600 28.96 1.80 1.66
BH-5
1 3.00 0.50 2.50 5.50 18.00 26.00 32.00 6.50 9.00 27.65 NP NP 10.65 1.56 0.0059 29.48 1.82 1.64
2 4.00 2.00 1.50 5.50 21.00 41.00 16.00 7.00 6.00 29.00 NP NP 9.84 1.62 0.0042 28.50 1.89 1.72
3 5.00 5.00 2.00 4.00 20.00 26.00 30.00 7.00 6.00 30.50 NP NP 8.55 1.56 0.0560 28.74 1.82 1.68
4 7.00 0.50 5.00 8.50 21.00 31.00 22.50 4.00 7.50 31.80 NP NP 8.35 1.55 0.0610 28.32 1.79 1.65
APPENDIX-III
 LABORATORY TEST REPORT OF ROCK SAMPLES

Construction of HL Bridge at Chainaige 9800m, on road T07-Osam(T018) to Khairajara via Merudaru, Chirwabeda over local Nala under Petarwar Block, Bokarao
Site Location :
District

Uniaxial
Core Compressive Bearing Capacity
Depth R.Q.D ( Moisture Specific Bulk
Sample Recovery ( Dry Density Strength as per as per (IS:12070- Classification
in(m) %) Content(%) Gravity Density
%) (IS:8764- 1987)Mpa
1998)Mpa

BH-1

CR-1 5.50 10 NIL 1.56 1.65 2.44 2.40 29.90 11.96 Moderately Strong
CR-2 7.00 15 NIL 2.60 1.78 2.51 2.45 30.75 12.30 Moderately Strong
CR-3 8.50 18 NIL 2.75 1.59 2.67 2.60 32.46 12.98 Moderately Strong
BH-2

CR-1 6.00 14 NIL 1.95 1.69 2.36 2.31 28.19 11.28 Moderately Strong
CR-2 7.00 18 NIL 1.85 1.55 2.45 2.41 30.75 12.30 Moderately Strong
CR-3 9.00 22 NIL 2.30 1.72 2.48 2.42 31.61 12.64 Moderately Strong
BH-3
CR-1 5.50 13 NIL 2.56 1.66 2.63 2.56 32.46 12.98 Moderately Strong
CR-2 7.00 20 NIL 1.57 1.74 2.47 2.43 33.32 13.33 Moderately Strong
CR-3 9.00 21 NIL 2.88 1.80 2.38 2.31 32.89 13.16 Moderately Strong
BH-4
CR-1 6.00 18 NIL 2.18 1.59 2.45 2.40 30.75 12.30 Moderately Strong
CR-2 8.00 20 NIL 2.16 1.67 2.56 2.51 32.46 12.98 Moderately Strong
CR-3 9.50 26 NIL 2.64 1.58 2.98 2.90 33.32 13.33 Moderately Strong
BH-5

CR-1 6.00 18 NIL 1.48 1.48 2.64 2.60 31.61 12.64 Moderately Strong
CR-2 7.00 20 NIL 1.69 1.60 2.35 2.31 33.32 13.33 Moderately Strong
CR-3 9.00 26 NIL 1.77 1.66 2.19 2.15 34.26 13.70 Moderately Strong
APPENDIX-IV
 Uniaxial Compressive strength Test for Rock as per (IS:8764-2010)

Allowable
Uniaxial
bearring Correction Factors
compressiv Allowable
Core Dia Is(50) = capacity qa for (Submerged
Depth Load(P) Load(P) 1.5 e strength bearring
Sl No. (D) D^1.5 sqrt (D50) P/(D *Sqrt(D as per condition,Cavatie Classification
(meter) in KN in N (MN/sqm) capacity qa
(mm) 50)) (IS:12070- s and Slope)
qc=22 Is(50) in (t/sqm)
1987) =0.125*qc
MPa
Mpa

BH-1
1 51 7.00 3.50 3500 364.21 7.07 1.36 29.90 2.99 0.37 38.11 Moderately Strong
2 51 8.00 3.60 3600 364.21 7.07 1.40 30.75 3.08 0.38 39.20 Moderately Strong
3 51 10.50 3.80 3800 364.21 7.07 1.48 32.46 3.25 0.41 41.38 Moderately Strong
BH-2
4 51 6.00 2.90 3300 364.21 7.07 1.28 28.19 2.82 0.35 35.93 Moderately Strong
5 51 8.50 3.20 3600 364.21 7.07 1.40 30.75 3.08 0.38 39.20 Moderately Strong
6 51 10.50 3.50 3700 364.21 7.07 1.44 31.61 3.16 0.40 40.29 Moderately Strong
BH-3
1 51 5.50 3.80 3800 364.21 7.07 1.48 32.46 3.25 0.41 41.38 Moderately Strong
2 51 7.50 3.90 3900 364.21 7.07 1.51 33.32 3.33 0.42 42.46 Moderately Strong
3 51 9.00 3.85 3850 364.21 7.07 1.49 32.89 3.29 0.41 41.92 Moderately Strong
4 51 10.50 3.95 3950 364.21 7.07 1.53 33.74 3.37 0.42 43.01 Moderately Strong
BH-4
1 51 6.00 3.60 3600 364.21 7.07 1.40 30.75 3.08 0.38 39.20 Moderately Strong
2 51 7.00 3.8 3800 364.21 7.07 1.48 32.46 3.25 0.41 41.38 Moderately Strong
3 51 8.50 3.90 3900 364.21 7.07 1.51 33.32 3.33 0.42 42.46 Moderately Strong
4 51 10.50 3.90 3900 364.21 7.07 1.51 33.32 3.33 0.42 42.46 Moderately Strong
BH-5
1 51 7.00 3.70 3700 364.21 7.07 1.44 31.61 3.16 0.40 40.29 Moderately Strong
2 51 8.50 3.90 3900 364.21 7.07 1.51 33.32 3.33 0.42 42.46 Moderately Strong
3 51 10.50 4.01 4010 364.21 7.07 1.56 34.26 3.43 0.43 43.66 Moderately Strong
HYDRAULIC DESIGN CALCULATION
Construction of HL Bridge at Chainaige 9800m, on road T07-Osam(T018) to Khairajara
via Merudaru, Chirwabeda over local Nala under Petarwar Block, Bokarao District

Consultant:
Hydraulic data
Design Discharge 755.503 cumecs
Discharge by Slope-Area Method 429.911 cumecs
Discharge by Rational Method 503.668 cumecs
Discharge by Empirical Method 693.716 cumecs
HFL 99.258 m
Linear Waterway 130.560 m
LBL= 96.27 m
LWL= 96.27 m
0
Skew Angle= 0
Linear Waterway along bridge axis= 130.560 m
Velocity 3.521 m/s
Adopt
Velocity 3.5 m/s
Length of bridge= 77.480 m
0
Skew Angle= 0
Type of bridge= High Level RCC T-Beam & Slab
Span Arrangement= 4 x 19.36 without Footpath
Vertical Clearnace= 1.2 m
Afflux 0.230 m
Thickness of bearing and pedestal 0.234 m
Soffit Level= 100.922 m
Thickness of Slab & Girder= 1.875 m
Formation Level= 102.897 m
wearing coat= 0.1 m
Type of Foundation= Open Abutment
Open Pier
Effective linearwaterway along skew= 136.92-7 x 1.8 -2 x 0.4 = 64.08 m
Effective linearwaterway normal to flow= 64.08 m
q= 1.3 x755.5/64.08 = 15.327
f= 1.5
dsm= 1.34 x (q2/f)1/3 = 7.223 m
1.27 dsm= 9.173 m
2 dsm= 14.446 m
MSL for pier= 84.812 m
MSL for abutment= 90.085 m
Bearing Capacity for Abutment= 30 T
Bearing Capacity for Pier= 30 T
FOUND Depth of
Abt/Pier CH GL S/R LVL Foundation
A-1 44.720 99.742 92.742 91.242 8.500
P-1 22.360 97.316 91.316 89.316 8.000
P-2 0.000 96.540 91.040 89.040 7.500
P-3 22.360 96.819 90.819 88.819 8.000
A-2 44.720 99.721 92.721 91.221 8.500
RATIONAL METHOD

1- RAINFALL:
Io= 8 cm

2- CATCHMENT AREA (A):

A= 182 [Link].

3- LENGTH OF LONGEST SREAM (L):

L= 27.00 km
H= 94.00 m
4- Time of Concentration

(0.87 x L 3/H)
0.385
tc = 7.42 hr

5- Areal Reduction Factor

f= 0.65

6- Run-off coefficient

P= 0.800

7- Critical intensity of rainfall

Ic= Io (2/(tc+1)) 1.90 cm/hr

8- DISCHARGE BY RATIONAL METHOD

Q = 0.028 X f x P X A x Ic = 503.668 cumecs

Empirical Method

Q=C A 3/4
Here,
C= 14
A= 182 [Link].
Q= 693.716 cumecs
Afflux Calculation:
V= 3.500 m/s
A= 122.100 sqm
pier width=w= 1.800 m
No of pier=n= 3
LBL= 96.270 m
HFL= 99.258 m
obstruction due to pier= pier widthx(HFL-LBL)= 5.378
a= A-(w x n x (HFL - LBL)) = 105.965 m
A/a= 1.152
Afflux = ((V2 /17.88)+0.015) x (V2-1) = 0.23 m
LONGITUDINAL SECTION

Distance (X) Bed Level in m

in m
(1) (2)

0.000 98.877
30.000 98.696
60.000 98.634
90.000 98.443
120.000 98.239
150.000 98.191
180.000 97.799
210.000 97.905
240.000 97.791
270.000 97.682
300.000 97.655
330.000 97.531
360.000 97.341
390.000 97.046
420.000 96.870
450.000 96.704
480.000 96.509
510.000 96.361
540.000 96.363
570.000 96.216
600.000 95.958
630.000 95.919
660.000 95.798
690.000 95.747
720.000 95.594
750.000 95.493
780.000 95.426
810.000 95.216
840.000 95.109
870.000 95.013
900.000 94.919
930.000 94.820
960.000 94.665
990.000 94.670
1020.000 94.564
1044.000 94.526

S= 0.0054
100.000

99.000

98.000

97.000

96.000

95.000

94.000

93.000

92.000

91.000
CROSS SECTION AT CENTRE LINE OF PROPOSED BRIDGE

Distance Bed Level in HFL in m Xi+1 - Xi Yi = Yi+1 - Yi (Yi+1 + Yi) /2 Pi = Ai =

(X) in m m Col(3)- Sqrt(Col(4)^2 Col(4)*Col(7
Col(2) +Col(6)^2) )
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)

0.000 100.645
20.000 100.445
30.000 100.463
40.000 100.788
60.000 100.999
80.000 101.048
90.000 101.061
100.000 100.930
110.000 100.753
130.000 100.556
140.000 100.381
150.000 100.294
164.000 100.157
166.000 99.986
174.000 99.536
180.000 98.730 6.000 0.528 0.528 0.264 6.023 1.584
186.000 97.665 99.258 8.000 1.593 1.065 1.060 8.071 8.484
194.000 96.910 10.000 2.348 0.755 1.970 10.028 19.705
204.000 96.903 8.000 2.355 0.007 2.351 8.000 18.812
212.000 96.329 8.000 2.929 0.574 2.642 8.021 21.136
220.000 96.270 6.000 2.988 0.059 2.959 6.000 17.751
226.000 97.430 6.000 1.828 -1.160 2.408 6.111 14.448
232.000 97.399 8.000 1.859 0.031 1.843 8.000 14.748
240.000 99.759 8.000 -0.501 -2.360 0.679 8.341 5.432
248.000 100.943
254.000 102.342
266.000 103.049
278.000 102.256
290.000 101.256
294.000 102.365
304.000 101.566
310.000 100.585

SUM 68.595 122.100

A= 122.100
P= 68.595
R= A/P = 1.780
n= 0.035
K= A x 1/n x (R 2/3) = 5123.846
S= 0.0054

Kav= (K1x K2 x K3 ) 1/3 5829.471

Q= Kav x S 0.5 429.911 cumecs
A= 122.100
V= Q/A = 3.521 m/s
 LEVEL

92.000
98.000
102.000

94.000
96.000
100.000
104.000

0.000
20.000
30.000
40.000
60.000
80.000
90.000
100.000
110.000
130.000
140.000
150.000
164.000
166.000
174.000
180.000

DISTANCE
186.000
194.000
CROSS SECTION AT BRIDGE SITE

204.000
HFL = 93.202

212.000
220.000
226.000
232.000
240.000
248.000
254.000
266.000
278.000
290.000
294.000
304.000
310.000
CROSS SECTION AT 500M D/S OF PROPOSED BRIDGE

Distance Bed Level in HFL in m Xi+1 - Xi Yi = Yi+1 - Yi (Yi+1 + Yi) /2 Pi = Ai =

(X) in m m Col(3)- Sqrt(Col(4)^ Col(4)*Col(7
Col(2) 2+Col(6)^2) )
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)

0.000 96.375 0.000 1.795 1.795 0.898 1.795 0.000

8.000 95.729 8.000 2.441 0.646 2.118 8.026 16.946
12.000 95.278 4.000 2.892 0.451 2.667 4.025 10.667
14.000 95.382 2.000 2.788 -0.104 2.840 2.003 5.680
16.000 94.805 2.000 3.365 0.577 3.077 2.082 6.153
20.000 94.526 4.000 3.644 0.279 3.505 4.010 14.019
24.000 95.337 4.000 2.833 -0.811 3.239 4.081 12.955
26.000 95.346 2.000 2.824 -0.009 2.829 2.000 5.657
30.000 95.168 98.170 4.000 3.002 0.178 2.913 4.004 11.653
35.000 95.200 5.000 2.970 -0.032 2.986 5.000 14.931
40.000 95.500 5.000 2.670 -0.300 2.820 5.009 14.101
50.000 95.600 10.000 2.570 -0.100 2.620 10.000 26.203
60.000 95.800 10.000 2.370 -0.200 2.470 10.002 24.703

SUM 62.038 163.669

A= 163.669
P= 62.038
R= 2.638
n= 0.035
K= 8928.382
S= 0.0054
K= 8928.382
 CROSS SECTION AT 500 M D/S OF BRIDGE SITE

97.000

96.500

96.000

95.500
LEVEL

95.000

94.500

94.000

93.500

DISTANCE
CROSS SECTION AT 500M U/S OF PROPOSED BRIDGE

Distance Bed Level in HFL in m Xi+1 - Xi Yi = Yi+1 - Yi (Yi+1 + Yi) /2 Pi = Ai =

(X) in m m Col(3)- Sqrt(Col(4)^ Col(4)*Col(7
Col(2) 2+Col(6)^2) )
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)

0.000 103.868
6.000 103.934
10.000 101.353
16.000 99.962
20.000 99.044 4.000 3.477 3.477 1.739 5.300 6.955
24.000 98.877 4.000 3.644 0.167 3.561 4.003 14.243
28.000 99.077 4.000 3.444 -0.200 3.544 4.005 14.177
32.000 99.951 102.521 4.000 2.570 -0.874 3.007 4.094 12.029
36.000 99.950 4.000 2.571 0.001 2.571 4.000 10.283
40.000 100.280 4.000 2.241 -0.330 2.406 4.014 9.625
46.000 100.291 6.000 2.230 -0.011 2.236 6.000 13.415
48.000 102.045 2.000 0.476 -1.754 1.353 2.660 2.706
52.000 102.472
52.000 103.554

SUM 34.077 83.432

A= 83.432
P= 34.077
R= 2.448
n= 0.035
K= 4330.307
S= 0.0054
K= 4330.307
 CROSS SECTION AT 500 M U/S OF BRIDGE SITE

105.000

104.000

103.000

102.000

101.000
LEVEL

100.000

99.000

98.000

97.000

96.000
10.000

16.000

20.000

24.000

28.000

32.000

36.000

40.000

46.000

48.000

52.000

52.000
0.000

6.000

DISTANCE
ABUTMENT
A-1_19.36m Data

1.0 Span Arrangement

Span Arrangement (c/c of bearing) = 4 x 18.750 m

Span Arrangement (c/c of Exp. Joint) = 4 x 19.360 m
Dist. Betn c/l of exp jt to c/l of brg = 0.305 m

Projection of deck beyond c/l of brg = 0.285 m (Square)

Width of Expansion Gap = 0.040 m (Square)
Width of Carriageway = 7.500 m
Skew Angle = 0.00 Deg = 0.000 radians

No. of Lane loading for design = 2 (2 for 2Lane loading or 3 for 3Lane loading)

1.1 Reduced Levels

FRL AT CENTRE = 102.897 m

Cross Camber = 2.500 %
C/C spacing of girder = 2.500 m
FRL at outermost bearing location = 102.835 m
Depth of the superstructure at End beam = 1.875 m
Thickness of wearing course = 0.100 m 648
Soffit Level = 100.922 m
Thickness of bearing & pedestal = 0.234 m
Abutment Cap Top Level = 100.688 m
Abutment Cap Bottom Level = 100.088 m
Maximum Scour Level = 84.812 m
Bed Level at A1 = 99.721 m 96
LBL = 96.270 m
LWL = 96.270 m
HFL = 99.258 m
Actual Foundation Level = 91.221 m
Design Foundation Level = 91.221 m
Size of bearing = 500 x 320 x 84 x 3 Nos
Min Size of Pedestals = 800 x 620 x 150 x 3 Nos

1.2 Dimensional details of structural components

Heel Toe
Width = 4.500 m Width = 3.500 m
Thickness at root = 2.000 m Thickness at root = 2.000 m
Tip Thickness = 0.900 m Tip Thickness = 0.900 m
Length of constant depth of heel = 0.000 m Length of constant depth of toe = 0.000 m

Abutment Shaft Abutment Cap

Width at top = 1.500 m Width at top of Rect. Part incl dirt wall = 1.800 m
Width at bottom = 1.500 m Width at bottom of Trap. Part = 1.500 m
Height = 6.867 m Thickness of rect part at top = 0.300 m
Length = 8.450 m Thickness of trap. part at bot. = 0.300 m
Batter on Earth side = 1H : 0V Length = 8.450 m

Solid Return Wall Cantilever Wall

Thickness at top = 0.300 m Av Thickness = 0.306 m
Thickness at bottom = 0.500 m Length = 0.000 m
Length at bottom = 4.500 m Height at root = 0.000 m
Height at Root = 9.576 m Height at tip (free end) = 0.300 m
Height at outer End = 10.676 m No of cantilever walls provided = 2
No of return walls provided = 2

Dirt Wall
Thickness = 0.300 m
Height = 2.109 m
Length = 8.450 m

Total Base Width = 9.500 m Total Base Length = 8.450 m

Total Height = 11.676 m Base Width/Height Ratio = 0.81

Radius of Curvature = 0 m Design speed of the vehicle = 80 kmph

Superelevation = 0.0 %

Number of girders at abutment = 3

A-1_19.36m Data

1.3 Loads and Forces from Superstructure

Dead Load Reaction = 1056.83 kN Trans. Ecc. of DL = 0.000 m

SIDL Reaction = 279.13 kN Trans. Ecc. of SIDL = 0.000 m
Wearing coat = 112.68 kN
FPLL Reaction = 0.000 kN Trans. Ecc. of FPLL = 0.000 m

Type of Bearing ("t" for Tar Paper, = e

"e" for Elasomeric & "p1" for fixed and "p2" for free POT/PTFE bearing)

1.4 Earth Pressure Parameters Rankines or Coulumbs ("r" or "c") c

The fill behind abutment and return wall shall conform to specifications given in appendix-6 of IRC:78-2014.

Angle of Repose of Soil f = 35.00 Degree

Cohesion C = 0.00 kN/m^2
Cohesion for sliding check c = 0.00 kN/m^2
Coeff. of friction at base between rock & conc. m = 0.70

Batter of Stem wall with horizontal a = 90.00 Degree

Inclination of Backfill with horizontal b = 0.00 Degree
Angle of Wall friction d = 23.33 Degree

Equiv. Ht. of backfill for Live load surcharge heb = 1.20 m

Equiv. Ht. of earth for L. L surcharge, Slip road Side htoe = 0.00 m

Unit weight of Soil (dry) gb = 19.00 kN/m^3

Unit weight of Soil (submerged) gsub = 10.00 kN/m^3
Unit weight of concrete for stability check gc = 25.00 kN/m^3
Unit weight of concrete (submerged) = 15.00 kN/m^3

Allowable Bearing Capacity (Normal Case) = 350.00 kN/m^2

Allowable Bearing Capacity (Seismic Case) = 437.50 kN/m^2

Active Earth pressure Coefficient for Stability Ka = 0.244

Passive Earth pressure Coefficient for Stability Kp = 0.000
Active Earth pressure Coefficient for design of stem Ka = 0.244

1.5 Seismic Load

Seismic Zone = III

Zone Factor = 0.16
Importance Factor = 1.0

1.6 Material properties

Grade of Concrete = M 25
Grade of steel = Fe 500
A-1_19.36m FIG.

0.04 m

0.30 m 102.897 m DECK LEVEL (at centre line) 0.000

0.000
cantilever wall

100.688 m ABUT. CAP TOP LEVEL

0.30 m 0.000
0.30 m 100.088 m ABUT. CAP BOTTOM LEVEL

1.50 m

0.00

99.721 m LBL

1.100 m
91.221 m FOUNDING
LEVEL
0.900 m
3.500 m 1.500 m 4.500 m

Elevation
(NTS)

8.450 m

9.500 m
Bottom Plan
(NTS)
Typical Sketch of Abutment
A-1_19.36m Load-Cal

2.0 Load Calculations:

0.000 4.500 0.300

c/L of brg.
0.00 8
2.109 1 1.800
1.175
0.300 13 4.200 2

0.300 12 4.500 3 Cap Bottom 100.088

0.30 1.500 0.000

11
0.367
4 1.175
Ground Level 99.721
4.500 1.500

10
6.500

4'
critical section of toe
1.500 Shaft Bottom 93.221
1.100 2.607 6 1.607
9
depth at critical sec= 1.537 2.000 2.000 1.100 depth at critical section= 1.405
7
5
92.121
5' 6' 7'
0.900 0.900 Founding RL 91.221

4.500 1.500 3.500

9.500

HEEL SHAFT TOE

c/L of Shaft
c/L of Base
SECTIONAL ELEVATION OF ABUTMENT

2.1 Concrete Components

Component Length Depth/ Area Nos Width Volume Eccentricity eL Eccentricity eL Ecc., eL @ toe Ecc., eL @
Height @ C/L base @ C/L abut (m) heel
(m) shaft junct.
(m) (m) (m^2) (m) (m^3) (m) (m)

1 0.300 2.109 0.633 1 8.450 5.346 -0.400 -0.900 -5.150 -0.150

2 1.800 0.300 0.540 1 8.450 4.563 0.350 -0.150 -4.400 0.600
3 1.650 0.300 0.495 1 8.450 4.183 0.350 -0.150 -4.400 0.600
4 1.500 0.367 0.551 1 8.450 4.652 0.500 0.000 -4.250 0.750
4' 1.500 6.500 9.750 1 8.450 82.388 0.500 0.000
5 2.250 1.100 2.475 1 8.450 20.914 -1.750 -2.250
6 1.500 1.100 1.650 1 8.450 13.943 0.500 0.000
7 1.750 1.100 1.925 1 8.450 16.266 2.417 1.917 -2.333
5' 4.500 0.900 4.050 1 8.450 34.223 -2.500 -3.000
6' 1.500 0.900 1.350 1 8.450 11.408 0.500 0.000
7' 3.500 0.900 3.150 1 8.450 26.618 3.000 2.500 -1.750
8 4.500 0.000 0.000 2 0.306 0.000 -2.050 -2.550
9 4.500 0.550 2.475 2 0.500 2.475 -1.750 -2.250
10 4.500 6.500 29.250 2 0.500 29.250 -2.500 -3.000
11 4.500 0.367 1.652 2 0.500 1.652 -2.500 -3.000
12 4.350 0.300 1.305 2 0.500 1.305 -2.574 -3.074
13 4.350 2.409 10.479 2 0.500 10.479 -2.500 -3.000
Total: 259.183
A-1_19.36m Load-Cal

Concrete Components upto HFL

Component Length Depth/ Area Nos Width Volume

5' 4.500 Height
0.900 4.050 1 8.450 34.223
6' 1.500 0.900 1.350 1 8.450 11.408
7' 3.500 0.900 3.150 1 8.450 26.618
5 2.250 1.100 2.475 1 8.450 20.914
6 1.500 1.100 1.650 1 8.450 13.943
7 1.750 1.100 1.925 1 8.450 16.266
9 4.500 0.550 2.475 2 0.500 2.475
4' 1.500 6.500 9.750 1 8.450 82.388
10 4.500 6.500 29.250 2 0.500 29.250
part of 11 4.500 0.367 1.652 2 0.500 1.652
part of 4 1.500 0.367 0.551 1 8.450 4.652
total 243.786

2.2 Backfill Components

Components Area Width Volume Eccentricity eL

@
base
(m^2) (m) (m^3) (m)

Above Heel Slab upto bottom of shaft(9) 2.475 8.450 20.914 -3.250
From bottom of shaft upto bed level(10) 29.250 8.450 247.163 -2.500
From bed level upto bottom of cap(11) 1.652 8.450 13.955 -2.500
From bottom of cap to bottom of dirt wall(12) 1.350 8.450 11.408 -2.500
From bottom of dirt wall upto top(13) 9.491 8.450 80.195 -2.200

2.3 Frontfill Components:

Components Area Width Volume Eccentricity eL Eccentricity eL Eccentricity eL Eccentricity eL

@ @ @ @
base abut shaft toe tip toe juncti.
(m^2) (m) (m^3) (m) (m) (m) (m)

GL to bottom of Shaft 22.750 8.450 192.238 3.000 2.500 -1.750 1.750

Above toe slab 1.925 8.450 16.266 3.583 3.083 -1.167 2.333

2.4 Calculation of Vertical loads at critical section for shear in Toe slab:

2.4.1 Normal Case with LWL condition:

Distance of critical section of Toe slab from tip of toe = 1.607 m

Components Area Length Volume Ecc., eL @ Toe Vertical Load

critical section P
(m) (KN)
(m^2) (m) (m^3)

Frontfill from GL to bottom of shaft 10.446 8.450 88.264 0.804 1677.03

Front fill above toe slab 0.406 8.450 3.429 0.536 65.15
Due to Toe slab 1.852 8.450 15.650 0.745 391.259

2.5 Calculation of Moments at face of stem in Toe slab:

2.5.1 Normal Case with LWL condition:

Components Area Length Volume Ecc., eL @ face Vertical Load Moment

of stem P
(m) (KN)
(m^2) (m) (m^3) (KN-m)

Frontfill from GL to bottom of shaft 22.750 8.450 192.238 1.750 3652.51 6391.90
Front fill above toe slab 1.925 8.450 16.266 2.333 309.06 721.14
Due to Toe slab 5.075 8.450 42.884 1.529 1072.094 1638.948
A-1_19.36m Load-Cal

2.6 Calculation of Vertical loads at crtitical section in Heel slab:

2.6.1 Normal Case :

Distance of critical section of Heel slab from tip of heel = 2.607 m
Component Length Depth Area Length Volume Vertical Load Ecc., eL @
(Average) P Heel critical
(KN) section
(m) (m) (m^2) (m) (m^3) (m)

9 2.607 0.319 0.831 7.450 0.690 13.12 1.738

10 2.607 6.500 16.946 7.450 287.150 5455.85 1.304
11 2.607 0.367 0.957 7.450 0.915 17.40 1.304
12 2.607 0.300 0.782 7.450 0.612 11.63 1.304
13 2.607 2.409 6.280 7.450 39.442 749.40 1.304
5' 2.607 0.900 2.475 8.450 20.914 522.85 1.304
5 2.607 0.319 4.050 8.450 34.223 855.57 0.869
For Seismic 40.969 0.00 1.738
Total For Normal Case 7625.82
For Seismic Case 7625.82

2.7 Calculation of Moments at face of stem in Heel slab:

2.7.1 Normal Case with LWL condition:

Component Length Depth Area Length Volume Vertical Load Ecc., eL @ face Moment @
(Average) P of stem critical Section
(KN) (m) (KNm)
(m) (m) (m^2) (m) (m^3)

9 4.500 0.550 2.475 8.450 20.914 397.37 3.000 1192.11

10 4.500 6.500 29.250 8.450 247.163 4696.09 2.250 10566.21
11 4.500 0.367 1.652 8.450 13.955 265.15 2.250 596.59
12 4.350 0.300 1.305 8.450 11.027 209.52 2.324 486.96
13 4.350 2.409 10.479 8.450 88.549 1682.43 2.324 3910.20
5' 4.500 0.900 2.475 8.450 20.914 522.85 2.250 1176.42
5 4.500 0.550 3.915 8.450 33.082 827.05 1.500 1240.58
For Seismic 293.059 0.00 3.000 0.00
Total For Normal Case 8600.46 19169.07
For Seismic Case 8600.46 19169.07
A-1_19.36m LL-Max (RKN)

3.0 CALCULATION OF LIVE LOAD REACTION AND MOMENTS

3.1 Maximum Reaction Case

Parameters
Left Side Span (C/C of Exp. Gap) = 19.36 m
Left Side Dist. Between Exp Gap & Bearing = 0.305 m
Left Side Span (C/C of Bearing) = 18.750 m

Load
Long
MAX REAC Breaking
Moment 1st Train 2nd Train
force
TYPE 1 IL_A FRW 353.01 107.7 500 0.00 100.00
TYPE2 1L_70RFRW 679.98 207.4 920 0.00 184.00
TYPE3 IL_A REV 284.46 86.8 486 0.00 97.20
TYPE4 1L_70R REV 737.61 225.0 1000 0.00 200.00
Note: The above value has been obtained using STAAD Pro Software.
Span
Ht of Breaking Force from brg level 3.115 m 18.75

Change in
Breaking Inc in Long
Vertical
Force Moment
Reaction
TYPE 1 IL_A FRW 100.00 16.61 5.07
TYPE2 1L_70RFRW 184.00 30.57 9.32
TYPE3 IL_A REV 97.20 16.15 4.93
TYPE4 1L_70R REV 200.00 33.23 10.13

Reduction Factor in longitudnal effect = 1.0

Summary of Loads @ maximum live load case (Excluding Impact factor):

Long Vertical Breaking

Vertical Load
Details of Load Cases Moment Load Force
kn knm kn kn
Case 1 : 1L_CLA FORW 369.62 112.74 516.61 100.00
Case 2 : 1L_70R_FORW 710.55 216.72 950.57 184.00
Case 3 : 1L_CLA REV 300.61 91.69 502.15 97.20
Case 4 : 1L_70R REV 770.84 235.11 1033.23 200.00
Case 5 : Cl A_2 Lane FORW 739.25 225.47 1033.23 200.00
Case 6 : Cl A_2 Lane REV 601.22 183.37 1004.30 194.40
Case 7 : Cl A_(1 Lane FORW+ 1 Lane_REV) 670.23 204.42 1018.76 197.20
A-1_19.36m LL-Max (L-MOM)

3.2 Maximum Longitudinal moment Case

3.21 Parameters

Span (C/C of Exp. Gap) = 19.360 m

Dist. Between Exp Gap & Bearing = 0.305 m
Span (C/C of Bearing) = 18.750 m
The line sketch for the spans and the abutment is shown below.
19.36

A B

18.750 0.305
From STAAD OUTPUT
Long Load Breaking
MAX REAC
Moment 1st Train 2nd Train force
TYPE 1 IL_A FRW 353.01 107.7 500 0.00 100.00
TYPE2 1L_70RFRW 679.98 207.4 920 0.00 184.00
TYPE3 IL_A REV 284.46 86.8 486 0.00 97.20
TYPE4 1L_70R REV 737.61 225.0 1000 0.00 200.00

3.22 Change in vertical load due to breaking:

Span
Ht of Breaking Force from brg level = 3.115 m 18.75 m
Change in
Breaking Inc in Long
Vertical
Force Moment
Reaction
TYPE 1 IL_A FRW 100.00 16.61 5.07
TYPE2 1L_70RFRW 184.00 30.57 9.32
TYPE3 IL_A REV 97.20 16.15 4.93
TYPE4 1L_70R REV 200.00 33.23 10.13

Reduction Factor in longitudnal effect = 1.0

Summary of Loads for Maximum longitudinal Moment case (excluding impact factor):
Long Load on Span Braking force
Ver Load
Details of Load Cases Moment

Kn Knm Kn Kn
Case 1 : 1L_CLA FORW 453.01 112.74 516.61 100.00
Case 2 : 1L_70R_FORW 863.98 216.72 950.57 184.00
Case 3 : 1L_CLA REV 381.66 91.69 502.15 97.20
Case 4 : 1L_70R REV 937.61 235.11 1033.23 200.00
Case 5 : Cl A_2 Lane FORW 906.02 225.48 1033.23 200.00
Case 6 : Cl A_2 Lane REV 763.32 183.38 1004.30 194.40
Case 7 : Cl A_(1 Lane FORW+ 1 Lane_REV) 834.67 204.43 1018.76 197.20
A-1_19.36m LL- (T-MOM)

3.3 Maximum Transverse moment case

475 475
CL of Bridge

3750

8450

Carriageway configuration of 2-lane bridge

a) Class 70 R ( Wheeled ): 1Lane

475 475
CL of Bridge

1155

2595

8450

b) Class A ( 1 Lane )

475 475
CL of Bridge

2450
1300
8450

c) Class A ( 2 Lane )

475 475
CL of Bridge

700

3050
8450

Eccentricity from
Sr. center line of
Class of Loading
No. carriageway
(m)

1 Class 70R ( 1- Lane ) 1.155

2 Class A ( 1- Lane ) 2.450
3 Class A ( 2- Lane ) 0.700
A-1_19.36m LL- (T-MOM)

Hence maximum Transverse moment is as follows:

Eccentricity from Total

Transverse
center line of Reaction on
Sr. No. Moment
carriageway Pier
(kn-m)
(m) (kn)
Case 1 : 1L_CLA FORW 2.450 369.62 905.58
Case 2 : 1L_70R_FORW 1.155 710.55 820.68
Case 3 : 1L_CLA REV 2.450 300.61 736.49
Case 4 : 1L_70R REV 1.155 770.84 890.32
Case 5 : Cl A_2 Lane FORW 0.700 739.25 517.47
Case 6 : Cl A_2 Lane REV 0.700 601.22 420.85
Case 7 : Cl A_(1 Lane FORW+ 1 Lane_REV) 0.700 670.23 469.16
A-1_19.36m Summary _L.L

3.4 Summary of Load & Moments due to live load (with Impact Factor)
Impact Factor = 1.18 for class A 1.17 for class 70 R
Congestion Factor = 1.00
I :Maxm Reaction Case:
Vertical Load Long Moment Trans Moment Vertical load (Kn) Braking Force (Kn)
Details of Load Cases
kn kn - m kn - m R-Span R-Span
Case 1 : 1L_CLA FORW 435.21 112.74 905.58 608.28 100.00
Case 2 : 1L_70R_FORW 831.34 216.72 820.68 1112.17 184.00
Case 3 : 1L_CLA REV 353.95 91.69 736.49 591.25 97.20
Case 4 : 1L_70R REV 901.88 235.11 890.32 1208.88 200.00
Case 5 : Cl A_2 Lane FORW 870.42 225.47 517.47 1216.57 200.00
Case 6 : Cl A_2 Lane REV 707.90 183.37 420.85 1182.50 194.40
Case 7 : Cl A_(1 Lane FORW+ 1 Lane_REV) 789.16 204.42 469.16 1199.54 197.20

II: Maxm Long Moment Case:

Vertical Load Long Moment Trans Moment Vertical load (Kn) Braking Force (Kn)
Details of Load Cases
kn kn - m kn - m R-Span R-Span
Case 1 : 1L_CLA FORW 533.39 112.74 905.58 608.28 100.00
Case 2 : 1L_70R_FORW 1010.86 216.72 820.68 1112.17 184.00
Case 3 : 1L_CLA REV 449.38 91.69 736.49 591.25 97.20
Case 4 : 1L_70R REV 1097.00 235.11 890.32 1208.88 200.00
Case 5 : Cl A_2 Lane FORW 1066.79 225.48 517.47 1216.57 200.00
Case 6 : Cl A_2 Lane REV 898.77 183.38 420.85 1182.50 194.40
Case 7 : Cl A_(1 Lane FORW+ 1 Lane_REV) 1149.85 204.43 469.16 1199.54 197.20

Summary of Loads
Vertical Load Long Moment Trans Moment Vertical load (Kn) Braking Force (Kn)
Details of Load Cases
kn kn - m kn - m R-Span R-Span
Case 1: Max Rkn case 901.88 235.11 905.58 1216.57 200.00
Case 2: Max Long Moment case 1149.85 235.11 905.58 1216.57 200.00
A-1_19.36m Creep_shrinkage

4.0 Bending Moments due to temp, creep and shrinkage on Span

( As per Cl 215.4 of IRC:6-2017)
a) Due to temperature :
Temp. co-eff
T/oC a = 1.20E-05
o
Elongation at l = 1.20E-05 x 40 x 19360 = 4.646 mm
2
b) Residual shrinkage + creep strain ( As per Cl 217.3 of IRC:6-2017)
Co-eff for shrinkage strain: 2.00E-04 = 2.00E-04
Elongation d = 2.00E-04 x 19360 = 1.936 mm
2
Total Elongation = 4.646 + 1.936 = 6.58 mm

Force developed for POT PTFE Bearing :

Longitudinal Force on Bearing = Gad

due to horizontal movement of superstructure. t
G = Shear modulus of elastomer = 10
2
A = Area of bearing provided = 32 x 50 = 1600 cm
d = Movement of superstructure. = 0.65824 cm
t = Thk of Elastomer provided. = 8.4 cm.
= 10 x 1600 x0.65824
8.4
= 1253.79 Kg.
Total force on Pier = 1253.79 x3 x1 = 3761.37 Kg.
(No of (No of
brgs./span) Spans)
= 37.61 KN
Moment (Long) = 31.37 KNm
A-1_19.36m HF

5.0 Calculation of Horizontal force:

DL Reaction at free end (Max) = 1056.83 KN

LL Reaction at free end (Max) = 262.39 KN
SIDL Reaction (exept w.c.) = 279.13 KN
SIDL Reaction (due to w.c.) = 112.68 KN
5.1 Horizontal Force due to elastomeric bearing

Horizontal force at bearing level in the case of elastomeric bearings will be calculated as per cl. [Link] of IRC :6-2017

Horizontal Force for Elastomeric bearing = Fh / 2 + Vr ltc

where Fh = Braking Force in KN
Vrtc = Force due to elastomeric bearing property
= 37.61
5.2 Summary of Horizontal Forces due to elastomeric bearing

Details of Load Cases Max Load on Braking Centrifugal Trasverse Trasverse Horizontal
Vertical Span Force Force Ecc. Moment Force
Reaction
(KN) (KN) (KN) (KN) (m) (KNm) (KN)
Case 1 : 1L_CLA FORW 369.62 516.61 100.00 0.00 2.450 905.58 87.61
Case 2 : 1L_70R_FORW 710.55 950.57 184.00 0.00 1.155 820.68 129.61
Case 3 : 1L_CLA REV 300.61 502.15 97.20 0.00 2.450 736.49 86.21
Case 4 : 1L_70R REV 770.84 1033.23 200.00 0.00 1.155 890.32 137.61
Case 5 : Cl A_2 Lane FORW 739.25 1033.23 200.00 0.00 0.700 517.47 137.61
Case 6 : Cl A_2 Lane REV 601.22 1004.30 194.40 0.00 0.700 420.85 134.81
Case 7 : Cl A_(1 Lane FORW+ 1 Lane_REV) 670.23 1018.76 197.20 0.00 0.700 469.16 136.21

5.3 Calculation of Horizontal force at bearing Level for Long Seismic Case

Details of Load Cases Max Load on Braking Centrifugal Trasverse Trasverse Horizontal
Vertical Span Force Force Ecc. Moment Force
Reaction
(KN) (KN) (KN) (KN) (m) (KNm) (KN)

Case 1 : 1L_CLA FORW 369.62 516.61 0.00 0.00 2.45 905.58 37.61
Case 2 : 1L_70R_FORW 710.55 950.57 0.00 0.00 1.16 820.68 37.61
Case 3 : 1L_CLA REV 300.61 502.15 0.00 0.00 2.45 736.49 37.61
Case 4 : 1L_70R REV 770.84 1033.23 0.00 0.00 1.16 890.32 37.61
Case 5 : Cl A_2 Lane FORW 739.25 1033.23 0.00 0.00 0.70 517.47 37.61
Case 6 : Cl A_2 Lane REV 601.22 1004.30 0.00 0.00 0.70 420.85 37.61
Case 7 : Cl A_(1 Lane FORW+ 1 Lane_REV) 670.23 1018.76 0.00 0.00 0.70 469.16 37.61

5.4 Calculation of Horizontal force at bearing Level for Trans Seismic Case

Details of Load Cases Max Load on Braking Centrifugal Trasverse Trasverse Horizontal
Vertical Span Force Force Ecc. Moment Force
Reaction
(KN) (KN) (KN) (KN) (m) (KNm) (KN)

Case 1 : 1L_CLA FORW 369.62 516.61 20.00 0.00 2.45 905.58 47.61
Case 2 : 1L_70R_FORW 710.55 950.57 36.80 0.00 1.16 820.68 56.01
Case 3 : 1L_CLA REV 300.61 502.15 19.44 0.00 2.45 736.49 47.33
Case 4 : 1L_70R REV 770.84 1033.23 40.00 0.00 1.16 890.32 57.61
Case 5 : Cl A_2 Lane FORW 739.25 1033.23 40.00 0.00 0.70 517.47 57.61
Case 6 : Cl A_2 Lane REV 601.22 1004.30 38.88 0.00 0.70 420.85 57.05
Case 7 : Cl A_(1 Lane FORW+ 1 Lane_REV) 670.23 1018.76 39.44 0.00 0.70 469.16 57.33
A-1_19.36m WIND

6.0 Wind Loads (As per Clause 209 of IRC:6-2017)

Parameters
Span (C/C of Exp. Gap) = 19.36 m
Dist. Between Exp Gap & Bearing = 0.31 m
Span (C/C of Bearing) = 18.75 m
Depth of Superstructure = 1.875 m
Height of post+kerb = 1.160 m
Finished Road Level = 102.897 m

The horizontal wind pressure is calculated as per Cl: 209 of IRC : 6 - 2017
from the "Table of Wind Pressure & Wind Velocities ".

H= The average height in meter of the exposed surface above the mean retarding surface,
( Ground Level, Bed Level, or water level)
Vz = Horizontal velocity of wind in m /s at height H
Pz = Horizontal wind pressure in N / m2 at height H
H = Formation Level - Mean Retarding Surface

Mean Retarding Surface is the lowest of the following:

a) Ground Level = 99.721 m

Hence H = 3.176 m

We find out the wind pressure from the table given below.
Value as per Table 12 of IRC:6-2017 for Basic wind speed of 33m/s
H (m) Vz (m/s) Pz (N/m2)
10.00 27.80 463.70
15.00 29.20 512.50
3 27.80 463.70

From Fig. 10 of IRC:6-2017;

Basic wind speed = 47 m/s

Therefore the design horizontal wind pressure is : 940.6 N / m2

Or, Wind Pressure on loaded structure = 940.6 N / m2

6.1 Wind Loads on Structure (Both Span loaded condition)

Wind Load as per Clause 209.3 of IRC:6-2017

a) Wind load on Superstructure

Exposed deck area 0.5* ( 19.36 x 3.035) = 29.379 sqm
Exposed area of railing and post ( 0.90 x 3.75 + 1.60 x 2) = 6.575 sqm
Gust Factor, G (for Highway bridges upto span of 150m)= 2.0
for deck supported by 2 or more plate girder
c d
2.5 1.875 Here, CD = 2.47
A-1_19.36m WIND

FT = Pz x A1 x G x CD
Horizntal Wind Load on deck (Transv.) = 167.1KN acting @ RL 103.48 m
Horizntal Wind Load on deck (Long.) = 41.8KN acting @ RL 103.48 m

Upward or downward Vertical Wind Load

Fv = Pz x A3 x G x CL
A 3= 70.31 G= 2.00
CL= 0.75 Pz= 463.7 N/mm2
Fv= 48.9KN acting @ RL 102.90 m

Wind load on Live Load:

Wind Speed 39.594 m/s > 36 m/s Do not consider Wind Load on LL
For this case, CD = 1.2
FT = Pz x A1 x G x CD = 0
acting at 1.5 m above the roadway
Frontal area of 70R vehicle A1 = 28.68 m²
Frontal area of Class A A1 = 40.23 m²
70R (W) Class -A
Wind on L. Load from Left/Right Span 0.00 0.00 (in t)
Total Wind on LL 0 0.00 (in t)
C.g of Wind on Live Load (1.5+ 102.897 ) i.e acting @ RL 104 m
70R (W) Class -A
Total WL on DL+LL (Transv.) 167.06 167.06 KN
C.g of Wind Load 103.477 103.477 m

WL for loaded structure(trans direction) 167.1 KN acting @ RL 103.477 m

Moment @ Pier Base 167.07x11.68 1950.61 KNm
WL for loaded structure(long direction) 41.8 KN acting @ RL 103.477 m
Moment @ Pier Base 41.8x11.68 487.65 KNm

b) Wind Load on Substructure

Drag cofficient for substructure t= 1500 t/b= 0.18 1/ 6
b= 8450 H/b= 1.38
H= 11676
for rectangular Shaft
Say, CD = 1.4 From Table 13

Exposed area of abutment cap = 1.04 sqm

So, force on Abutment cap = 2.73 KN

Exposed area of Abutment wall = 17.5 sqm

So, force on Abutment wall = 4.61 KN

Trans Dir
load (KN) R.L. (m)
167.06 103.477
so, net moment at base of abt wall(trans) [Link]
= 1985.20 KNm 174.40
and net moment at base of abt wall (long) resultant force
= 496.30 KNm 2.73 100.345
Abutment cap wind

4.61 94.250
Abutment wall wind

Abut Bott 91.80

A-1_19.36m Seismic Coeff

7.0 Seismic Analysis of Bridges:

As per Clause 219 of IRC:78-2017
Geometry
1 Height of Abutment Wall above GL = 6.87 m
2 Thickness of abutment wall = 1.50 m
3 Dead load of Superstructure = 1448.64 KN
4 Live load on Abutment = 147.52 KN ( 20% Live Load considered)
5 Grade of Concrete M 25

Design Parameters
Options
1. Design Seismic Zone = III ( II, III, IV, V)
2. Type of soil = rocky/hard Rocky / Hard / medium / Soft
3. Type of Bridge = Important Important / Other
Calculation of Seismic Co-efficient ( Ah)
Horizontal Seismic Forces: Feq =Ah x (Dead Load + Appropriate Live load)
Table-16 of IRC:6-2017
Ah : = (Z/2)*I*(Sa/g) Zone factor
(R/I) Zone No. Zone factor
V 0.36
Z : Zone factor IV 0.24
0.16 III 0.16
II 0.10
(Sa/g) : Average response acceleratiobn coefficient for 5 per cent damping
depending upon fundamental period of vibration T as given in Fig. 13
which is based on the following equation. Strata Sa/g Limit for "T"
= f (T) function of fundamental period of vibration , <= T <=
1+15T 0 </= T </= 0.1
R : Response deduction factor 2.5 Rocky/ Hard 2.5 0.1 </= T </= 0.4
I : Importance factor 1.5 Important soil 1.0/ T 0.4 </= T </= 4
1.2 River Bridges 1+15T 0 </= T </= 0.1
1.0 Normal Bridges Medium soil 2.5 0 </= T </= 0.55
T : 2xSQRT(D/1000F) 1.36/ T 0.55 </= T </= 4
1+15T 0 </= T </= 0.1
Soft
D : Vertical Load 2.5 0.1 </= T </= 0.67
soil
F : Stiffness of the Section 1.67/ T 0.67 </= T </= 4

a) For Longitudinal Seismic Co-efficient

F = 3EI 5090775.117 = 15721.09 Kn/mm (For unit 1 mm deflection)

3
L 323.818
T = 2*SQRT(1448.6406)/(1000*15721.1))
=0.02
(Sa/g) = 1.29
(Z/2) = 0.08
(R/I) = 2.08
Ah = 0.05
b) For Transverse Seismic Co-efficient
F = 3EI = 160417.969 = 495.40 KN/mm
L3 323.818
T= 2*SQR'T((1448.6406+147.53)/(1000*495.4))
= 0.11
(Sa/g) = 2.50
(Z/2) = 0.08
(R/I) = 2.08
Ah = 0.10
A-1_19.36m Seis-Loads

8.0 Forces and Moments due to Seismic Case

Longitudinal Co-efficient of Horizontal Seismic Force= 0.078

Transverse Co-efficient of Horizontal Seismic Force= 0.111
Co-efficient of vertical Seismic Force= 0.000
8.1 Computation of Longitudinal Seismic Force

RL of Shaft base = 93.221 m

RL of Founding level = 91.221 m

Component Volume Vertical Load Horizontal RL of force of Moment Moment @ Vertical Longitudinal Mvsbase Longitudinal Mvstoe
V component action of HS @ base Shat base component Eccentricity VS x eL Eccentricity VS x etoe
of V MHB MHS of V @ base @ Toe
(KN) HS (m) VS eL etoe
(m^3) (KN) (KNm) (KNm) (KN) (m) (KNm) (m) (KNm)
DL Reaction 1056.83 82.71 100.92 802.33 636.92 0.00 0.075 0.00 -4.675 0.00
SIDL Reaction(Except w.c.) 279.13 21.84 100.92 211.91 168.22 0.00 0.075 0.00 -4.675 0.00
SIDL Reaction(For w.c.) 112.68 8.82 100.92 85.55 67.91 0.00 0.075 0.00 -4.675 0.00
LL
CWLL 1149.85 89.99 100.92 872.95 692.98 0.00 0.00 -4.750 0.00
FPLL 0.00 0.00 100.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 -4.750 0.00
Self Wt 0.00
Dirt Wall 133.66 133.66 10.46 101.84 111.10 90.18 0.00 -0.400 0.00 -5.150 0.00
Abutment Cap (rectangular part) 114.08 114.08 8.93 100.54 83.18 65.32 0.00 0.350 0.00 -4.400 0.00
Abutment Cap (Trapezoidal part) 104.57 104.57 8.18 100.24 73.83 57.46 0.00 0.350 0.00 -4.400 0.00
Abutment Shaft upto Bed Level 116.30 116.30 9.10 99.90 79.03 60.83 0.00 0.500 0.00 -4.250 0.00
Solid Return wall upto to GL 335.90 2059.69 161.19 101.31 1626.06 1303.69 0.00 -2.507 0.00 -7.257 0.00
Cantilever return wall upto GL 0.00 522.85 40.92 102.19 448.98 367.15 0.00 -2.050 0.00 -6.800 0.00
Backfill : Above Bed Level
Above Heel Slab upto bottom of shaft(9) 20.91 397.36 31.10 92.85 50.79 -11.40 0.00 -3.250 0.00 -8.000 0.00
From bottom of shaft upto bed level(10) 247.16 4696.09 367.51 96.47 1929.42 1194.40 0.00 -2.500 0.00 -7.250 0.00

SUM : Service Condition 840.74 6375.12 4693.65 0.00 0.00 0.00

SUM : Construction Condition 637.38 4402.39 3127.62 0.00 0.00 0.00

As the sesimic force is acting opposite direction to the earth force, the seismic forces below the Bed Level are taken as zero
A-1_19.36m Seis-Loads

8.2 Computation of transverse Seismic Force

RL of Shaft base = 93.221 m

RL of Founding level = 91.221 m

Component Volume Vertical Load Horizontal RL of force of Moment Moment @ Vertical Longitudinal Mvsbase Longitudinal Mvstoe
V component action of HS @ base Shat base component Eccentricity VS x eL Eccentricity VS x etoe
of V MHB MHS of V @ base @ Toe
(KN) HS (m) VS eL etoe
(m^3) (KN) (KNm) (KNm) (KN) (m) (KNm) (m) (KNm)
DL Reaction 1056.83 117.14 100.92 1136.34 902.07 0.00 0.075 0.00 -4.675 0.00
SIDL Reaction(Except w.c.) 279.13 30.94 100.92 300.13 238.25 0.00 0.075 0.00 -4.675 0.00
SIDL Reaction(For w.c.) 112.68 12.49 100.92 121.16 96.18 0.00 0.075 0.00 -4.675 0.00
LL
CWLL 229.97 25.49 100.92 247.27 196.29 0.00 0.000 0.00 -4.750 0.00
FPLL 0.00 0.00 100.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 -4.750 0.00
Self Wt
Dirt Wall 133.66 133.66 14.81 101.84 157.35 127.72 0.00 -0.400 0.00 -5.150 0.00
Abutment Cap (rectangular part) 114.08 114.08 12.64 100.54 117.80 92.51 0.00 0.350 0.00 -4.400 0.00
Abutment Cap (Trapezoidal part) 104.57 104.57 11.59 100.24 104.56 81.38 0.00 0.350 0.00 -4.400 0.00
Abutment Shaft upto Bed Level 116.30 116.30 12.89 99.90 111.93 86.15 0.00 0.500 0.00 -4.250 0.00
Solid Return wall upto to GL 335.90 2059.69 228.29 101.31 2303.00 1846.41 0.00 -2.507 0.00 -7.257 0.00
Cantilever return wall upto GL 0.00 522.85 57.95 102.19 635.89 519.99 0.00 -2.050 0.00 -6.800 0.00
Backfill : Above Bed Level
Above Heel Slab upto bottom of shaft(9) 20.91 397.36 44.04 92.85 71.94 -16.15 0.00 -3.250 0.00 -8.000 0.00
From bottom of shaft upto bed level(10) 247.16 4696.09 520.50 96.47 2732.64 1691.63 0.00 -2.500 0.00 -7.250 0.00

SUM : Service Condition 1088.78 8040.01 5862.46 0.00 0.00 0.00

SUM : Construction Condition 902.73 6235.11 4429.66 0.00 0.00 0.00

As the sesimic force is acting opposite direction to the earth force, the seismic forces below the Bed Level are taken as zero
9.0 Water current force
Mean velocity of water current = 4 m/sec
Transverse dimenion of Abutment = 8.5 m
Longitudinal dimension of Abutment shaft = 1.5 m
Type of cut water Circular
0
Possible variation in water current = 20
Max Velocity of water in Trans-Direction 5.656 m/s

As per Clause 210 of IRC :6 -2017

Allowing 20 0 for possible variation of current.

Maximum current effect in longitudinal direction

VL = 5.656 Sin (20)
= 1.934 m/s
2
VL = 3.742 m/s

Maximum current effect in transverse direction

VT = 5.656 Cos( 20)
= 5.315 m/s
2
VT = 28.248 m/s
9.1 Water currentforce in Longitudinal direction :
3.742 RL 99.258 (HFL)

124.750 KN

14.45

RL 93.221 (Bottom of Abutment shaft)

RL 84.812 (Maximum scour level)

Velocity Profile
As per clause 210.2 of IRC:6 - 2017 pressure due to water current is given by :
2
P = 52K V
where,
P = Intensity of pressure due to water current, in Kg/m2
V = Velocity of the current at the point where the pressure intensity
is being calculated, in meter per second
K = Const. = 0.66 ( For Abutment with semi-circular end )
Pressure intensity at Maximum scour level level
Pb = 0 N/ sq m
Pressure intensity at HFL level
Pt = 1284.31 N/ sq m
Pressure intensity at bottom of Abutment shaft
= 747.59

Total force on Abutment = 1015.95 x 14.45 x 8.50

1000 ( Height & width of Abutment )
= 124.750 KN
 C.G. of the force = 7.859 m

Total force on Abutment on found = 373.80 x 2.00 x 8.45

1000 ( Height & width of foundation )
= 6.317 KN

C.G. of the force = 0.000 m

Moment @ base of Abutment wall = 980.404 KNm above R.L. = 93.221

9.2 Water current effect in Transverse direction :

28.248 RL 99.258 (HFL)

166.18 KN

14.45

RL 93.221 (Bottom of Abutment shaft)

0
RL 84.812 (Maximum scour level)

As per clause 210.2 of IRC:6 - 2017 pressure due to water current is given by :
P = 52 K V2
where,
P = Intensity of pressure due to water current, in Kg/m2
Velocity of the current at at the point where the pressure intensity is
V = being calculated,in meter per second
K = Constant = 0.66 ( For Abutment with semi-circular end )

i) Pressure intensity at bottom of Abutment

Pb = 0
Pressure intensity at HFL level
Pt = 9694.77
Pressure intensity at bottom of Abutment shaft
= 5643.32

Total force on Abutment = 7669.05 x 14.446 x 1.5

1000 ( Height & width of Abutment )
= 166.181 KN

C.G. of the force = 7.859 m

Moment @ base of Abutment wall = 1306.01 KNm above R.L. = 93.221
9.3 Buoyant force:
Volume of Abutment section submerged @ HFL cond.
= 243.79 m3
For Abutment design, Reduction in weight = 0.15 x V
(considering 15% Buoyant Force) = 365.68 KN
For Design of Found, Reduction in weight = 2437.86 KN
(considering 100% Buoyant Force)
A-1_19.36m Check for Base Pressure

10.0 CHECK FOR BASE PRESSURE:

10.1 Vertical Loads and Moments

S. No. Item Volume g P eL ML eT MT eToe Mtoe

3 3
(m ) (kN/m ) (kN) (m) (kNm) (m) (kNm) (m) (kNm)
Permanent Load
1 Dead Load Reaction 1056.83 0.075 79.26 0.000 0.00 -4.675 -4940.68
2 SIDL Reaction (except w.c.) 279.13 0.075 20.93 0.000 0.00 -4.675 -1304.92
2 SIDL Reaction (due to w.c.) 112.68 0.075 8.45 0.000 0.00 -4.675 -526.79
3 FPLL Reaction 0.00 0.075 0.00 0.000 0.00 -4.675 0.00
3 CWLL Reaction 1149.85 0.075 86.24 905.58 -4.675 -5375.55
4 SIDL over Returns 0.00 KN/m 4.80 0.00 -2.650 0.00 0.000 0.00 -7.400 0.00
Dead Load of Sub Structure & Found
5 Dirt Wall 5.346 25.00 133.66 -0.400 -53.46 0.000 0.00 -5.150 -688.35
6 Abutment Cap (rectangular part) 4.563 25.00 114.08 0.350 39.93 0.000 0.00 -4.400 -501.93
7 Abutment Cap (Trapezoidal part) 4.183 25.00 104.57 0.350 36.60 0.000 0.00 -4.400 -460.11
8 Abutment Shaft upto Bed Level 4.652 25.00 116.30 0.500 58.15 0.000 0.00 -4.250 -494.25
9 Abutment Shaft below Bed Level 82.388 25.00 2059.69 0.500 1029.84 0.000 0.00 -4.250 -8753.67
10 Heel Slab Tapering 20.914 25.00 522.85 -1.750 -914.98 0.000 0.00 -6.500 -3398.49
11 between tapering heel and toe 13.943 25.00 348.56 0.500 174.28 0.000 0.00 -4.250 -1481.39
12 toe slab tapering 16.266 25.00 406.66 2.417 982.76 0.000 0.00 -2.333 -948.87
13 Heel Slab uniform 34.223 25.00 855.56 -2.500 -2138.91 0.000 0.00 -7.250 -6202.83
14 Between Uniform Heel and Toe 11.408 25.00 285.19 0.500 142.59 0.000 0.00 -4.250 -1212.05
15 Toe Slab Uniform 26.618 25.00 665.44 3.000 1996.31 0.000 0.00 -1.750 -1164.52
16 Cantilever Return Wall 0.000 25.00 0.00 -2.050 0.00 0.000 0.00 -6.800 0.00
17 Solid Return wall 45.161 25.00 1129.02 -2.461 -2778.56 0.000 0.00 -7.211 -8141.41
Backfill Component
18 Above Heel Slab upto bottom of shaft(9) 20.914 19.00 397.36 -3.250 -1291.42 0.000 0.00 -8.000 -3178.89
19 From bottom of shaft upto bed level(10) 247.163 19.00 4696.09 -2.500 -11740.22 0.000 0.00 -7.250 -34046.63
20 From bed level upto bottom of cap(11) 13.955 19.00 265.15 -2.500 -662.87 0.000 0.00 -7.250 -1922.33
21 From bottom of cap to bottom of dirt wall(12) 11.408 19.00 216.74 -2.500 -541.86 0.000 0.00 -7.250 -1571.38
22 From bottom of dirt wall upto top(13) 80.195 19.00 1523.70 -2.200 -3352.14 0.000 0.00 -6.950 -10589.71
Frontfill Component
23 GL to bottom of Shaft 192.238 19.00 3652.51 3.000 10957.54 0.000 0.00 -1.750 -6391.90
24 Above toe slab 16.266 19.00 309.06 3.583 1107.46 0.000 0.00 -1.167 -360.57

Totals 20400.66 -6754.08 905.58 -103657.22

A-1_19.36m Check for Base Pressure

10.2 Horizontal Forces and Moments @ RL 91.221 m

S. No. Item

Eccentricity @ Base

Eccentricity @ Base

of return wall MT
Moment @ Base

Moment @ Base
of return wall eT
Horizontal Force

Horizontal Force
of abutment ML
of abutment eL

Moment about
Pressure p in

Pressure p in
Unit Weight

transverse
longitudal
direction

direction

toe, ML
Length

Height

Height

HT
HL
(m) (m) (KN/m3) (KN/m2) (KN) (m) (KNm) (m) (KN/m^2) (KN) (m) (KNm) (KNm)
1 Horizontall Force at Bearing Level 137.61 9.70 1334.99 0.00 9.70 0.00 1334.99
2 Horizontal Force for Long Seis 37.61 9.70 364.89 0.00 9.70 0.00 364.89
3 Horizontal Force for Trans Seis 57.61 9.70 558.91 0.00 9.70 0.00 558.91
4 Centrifugal Force above deck level 0.00 12.88 0.00 0.00 12.88 0.00 0.00
5 Live Load Surcharge Pressure 8.450 1.20 19.00 5.57 549.80 5.84 3209.72 1.20 5.57 0.00 6.29 0.00 3209.72
6 Active Earth Pressure 8.450 11.68 19.00 54.22 2674.77 4.90 13116.86 11.68 54.22 0.00 9.95 0.00 13116.86
7 Minimum Fluid Pressure 8.450 11.68 4.80 56.04 2764.75 3.89 10760.41 11.68 56.04 0.00 4.79 0.00 10760.41
8 Governing Pressure 2764.75 13116.86 0.00 0.00 13116.86
Totals 3452.16 17661.58 0.00 0.00 17661.58

10.3 Summary of loads and Moment @ base of abutment foundation for checking base pressure as per note 9 given in Table 3.4 of IRC:6-2017

Load Cases Load HL HT Long Mom Tran Mom

Permanent Load during service
Dead Load of S.S 1056.83 79.26 0.00
SIDL (Except w.c.) 279.13 20.93 0.00
SIDL (only for w.c.) 112.68 8.45 0.00
Dead Load form Sub-Str & Found 5612.54 1353.11 0.00
Backfill weight 7099.04 -17588.51 0.00
Frontfill 3961.57 12065.00 0.00
Earthpressure due to backfill (Leading) 0.00 3314.55 16326.59 0.00
Permanent Load (During construction)
Dead Load of S.S 105.68 0.00 0.00 7.93 0.00
SIDL (Except w.c.) 27.91 0.00 0.00 2.09 0.00
SIDL (only for w.c.) 11.27 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.00
Dead Load form Sub-Str & Found 561.25 0.00 0.00 135.31 0.00
Backfill wieght 7099.04 0.00 0.00 -17588.51 0.00
Frontfill 3961.57 0.00 0.00 12065.00 0.00
Earthpressure due to backfill (Accompanying) 0.00 3314.55 0.00 16326.59 0.00
Variable Load (Leading)
Max LL (Leading) 770.84 235.11 905.58
FPLL (Leading) 0.00 0.00 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) 137.61 1334.99 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) for Long Seis 37.61 364.89 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) for Trans Seis 57.61 558.91 0.00
Centrifugal Force (Leading) 0.00 0.00 0.00
A-1_19.36m Check for Base Pressure

Wind force (Leading) 48.91 43.60 174.40 496.30 1985.20

Variable Load (Accompanying)
Max LL (Accompanying) 770.84 0.00 0.00 235.11 905.58
FPLL ((Accompanying)) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Horizontal Force (Accompanying) 0.00 137.61 0.00 1334.99 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) for Long Seis 37.61 0.00 364.89 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) for Trans Seis 57.61 0.00 558.91 0.00
Centrifugal Force (Accomanying) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Wind force (Accompanying) 48.91 43.60 174.40 496.30 1985.20
Live Load Surcharge as accompanying 866.97 549.80 0.00 3209.72 0.00
Hydraulic Load (Accompanying)
Water current forces 3.74 28.25 980.40 1306.01
Buoyant force -365.68
Variable Load (During construction)
Max LL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FPLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Horizontal Force 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Centrifugal Force 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Seismic Force (During Service)
Seismic Longitudinal 840.74 6375.12
Seismic Transverse 1088.78 8040.01
Seismic Force (During Construction)
Seismic Longitudinal 637.38 4402.39
Seismic Transverse 902.73 6235.11

CHECK OF BASE PRESSURE

Size of Foundation in L-L Direction= 9.50
Size of Foundation in T-T Direction= 8.45
Area= 80.28
ZL= 127.10
ZT= 113.05
LOAD CASES CONSIDERED
Combination- I
DL + (LL or Snow Load)+ WC + Frictional Force at Bearing+ Breaking Force +Buoyancy + Centrifugal Force + Earth Pressure
Combination-II
i) Comination -I +(WL)
ii) Combination-I + (Seismic_Long)
ii) Combination-I + (Seismic_Transv)
A-1_19.36m Check for Base Pressure

Combination-III
DL + WC + Buoyancy + Earth Pressure + Erection Effect + Frictional Force at Bearing+ WL
DL + WC + Buoyancy + Earth Pressure + Erection Effect + Frictional Force at Bearing+ Seismic Force_Long
Net Bearing Capacity= 350 KN/m2
Depth of Foundation= 8.50 m
Submerged Density of Sub soil = 10.00 KN/m3
10.4 Check for Base pressure at the founding level
Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination)
Long Mom Tran Mom Max Base Min Base Gross
Load Cases Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN) (KNM) (KNm) Pressure Pressure Bearing Check
Combination- I
DL + (LL or Snow Load)+ WC + Frictional
Force at Bearing+ Breaking Force
+Buoyancy + Centrifugal Force + Earth
Pressure
18526.95 3455.91 28.25 14815.33 2211.6 366.92 94.67 435.0 OK
Combination-II
i) Comination -I +(WL) 18575.85 3499.51 202.65 15311.63 4196.78 388.99 73.81 578.6 OK
ii) Combination-I + (Seismic_Long) 17910.28 4196.64 28.25 20032.27 1487.12 393.87 52.35 652.5 OK
ii) Combination-I + (Seismic_Transv) 17910.28 3375.91 1117.03 13851.17 9527.14 416.36 29.86 652.5 OK
Combination-III
DL + WC + Buoyancy + Earth Pressure +
Erection Effect + Frictional Force at
Bearing+ WL
17805.02 3499.51 202.65 15076.53 3291.20 369.53 74.07 578.6 OK
DL + WC + Buoyancy + Earth Pressure +
Erection Effect + Frictional Force at
Bearing+ Seismic Force_Long
17805.02 4240.24 202.65 20481.55 3291.20 412.05 31.55 652.5 OK
DL + WC + Buoyancy + Earth Pressure +
Erection Effect + Frictional Force at
Bearing+ Seismic Force_Trans
17805.02 3419.51 1291.43 14300.45 11331.22 434.54 9.06 652.5 OK
Allowance for tension at the base of foundation in case of rock
assume L= 11.590
B= 10.309
Area= 119.48 reduction in area = 33 % OK
ZL= 205.29
ZT= 230.80
DL + WC + Buoyancy + Earth Pressure + Erection Effect + Frictional Force at Bearing+ Seismic Force_Trans
P= 17805.02
ML= 14300.45
MT= 11331.22
Max Pr= 268
Min Pr= 30
A-1_19.36m Check for Equilibrium

11.0 CHECK FOR EQUILIBRIUM:

11.1 Vertical Loads and Moments

S. No. Item Volume g P eL ML eT MT eToe Mtoe

3 3
(m ) (kN/m ) (kN) (m) (kNm) (m) (kNm) (m) (kNm)
1 Dead Load Reaction 1056.83 0.075 79.26 0.000 0.00 -4.675 -4940.68
2 SIDL Reaction (except w.c.) 279.13 0.075 20.93 0.000 0.00 -4.675 -1304.92
2 SIDL Reaction (due to w.c.) 112.68 0.075 8.45 0.000 0.00 -4.675 -526.79
3 FPLL Reaction 0.00 0.075 0.00 0.000 0.00 -4.675 0.00
3 CWLL Reaction 1149.85 0.075 86.24 905.58 -4.675 -5375.55
4 SIDL over Returns 0.00 KN/m 4.80 0.00 -2.650 0.00 0.000 0.00 -7.400 0.00
Dead Load of Sub Structure & Found
5 Dirt Wall 5.346 25.00 133.66 -0.400 -53.46 0.000 0.00 -5.150 -688.35
6 Abutment Cap (rectangular part) 4.563 25.00 114.08 0.350 39.93 0.000 0.00 -4.400 -501.93
7 Abutment Cap (Trapezoidal part) 4.183 25.00 104.57 0.350 36.60 0.000 0.00 -4.400 -460.11
8 Abutment Shaft upto Bed Level 4.652 25.00 116.30 0.500 58.15 0.000 0.00 -4.250 -494.25
9 Abutment Shaft below Bed Level 82.388 25.00 2059.69 0.500 1029.84 0.000 0.00 -4.250 -8753.67
10 Heel Slab Tapering 20.914 25.00 522.85 -1.750 -914.98 0.000 0.00 -6.500 -3398.49
11 between tapering heel and toe 13.943 25.00 348.56 0.500 174.28 0.000 0.00 -4.250 -1481.39
12 toe slab tapering 16.266 25.00 406.66 2.417 982.76 0.000 0.00 -2.333 -948.87
13 Heel Slab uniform 34.223 25.00 855.56 -2.500 -2138.91 0.000 0.00 -7.250 -6202.83
14 Between Uniform Heel and Toe 11.408 25.00 285.19 0.500 142.59 0.000 0.00 -4.250 -1212.05
15 Toe Slab Uniform 26.618 25.00 665.44 3.000 1996.31 0.000 0.00 -1.750 -1164.52
16 Cantilever Return Wall 0.000 25.00 0.00 -2.050 0.00 0.000 0.00 -6.800 0.00
17 Solid Return wall 45.161 25.00 1129.02 -2.200 -2483.84 0.000 0.00 -6.950 -7846.69
Backfill Component
18 Above Heel Slab upto bottom of shaft(9) 20.914 19.00 397.36 -3.250 -1291.42 0.000 0.00 -8.000 -3178.89
19 From bottom of shaft upto bed level(10) 247.163 19.00 4696.09 -2.500 -11740.22 0.000 0.00 -7.250 -34046.63
20 From bed level upto bottom of cap(11) 13.955 19.00 265.15 -2.500 -662.87 0.000 0.00 -7.250 -1922.33
21 From bottom of cap to bottom of dirt wall(12) 11.408 19.00 216.74 -2.500 -541.86 0.000 0.00 -7.250 -1571.38
22 From bottom of dirt wall upto top(13) 80.195 19.00 1523.70 -2.200 -3352.14 0.000 0.00 -6.950 -10589.71
Frontfill Component
23 GL to bottom of Shaft 192.238 19.00 3652.51 3.000 10957.54 0.000 0.00 -1.750 -6391.90
24 Above toe slab 16.266 19.00 309.06 3.583 1107.46 0.000 0.00 -1.167 -360.57

Totals 20400.66 -6459.36 905.58 -103362.50

A-1_19.36m Check for Equilibrium

11.2 Horizontal Forces and Moments @ RL 91.221 m

Moment @ Base

Moment @ Base
S. No. Item

Horizontal Force

Horizontal Force
of abutment ML

Moment about
Base of return

of return wall
Eccentricity @

Eccentricity @
Pressure p in

Pressure p in
abutment eL
Unit Weight

transverse
longitudal
direction

direction

toe, ML
Base of

wall eT
Length

Height

Height

MT
HT
HL
(m) (m) (KN/m3) (KN/m2) (KN) (m) (KNm) (m) (KN/m^2) (KN) (m) (KNm) (KNm)
1 Horizontal Force at Bearing Level 137.61 9.70 1334.99 0.00 9.70 0.00 1334.99
2 Horizontal Force for Long Seis 37.61 9.70 364.89 0.00 9.70 0.00 364.89
3 Horizontal Force for Trans Seis 57.61 9.70 558.91 0.00 9.70 0.00 558.91
2 Centrifugal Force above deck level 0.00 12.88 0.00 0.00 12.88 0.00 0.00
3 Live Load Surcharge Pressure 8.450 1.20 19.00 5.57 549.80 5.84 3209.72 1.20 5.57 0.00 6.29 0.00 3209.72
4 Active Earth Pressure 8.450 11.68 19.00 54.22 2674.77 4.90 13116.86 11.68 54.22 0.00 9.95 0.00 13116.86
5 Minimum Fluid Pressure 8.450 11.68 4.80 56.04 2764.75 3.89 10760.41 11.68 56.04 0.00 4.79 0.00 10760.41
6 Governing Pressure 2764.75 13116.86 0.00 0.00 13116.86
Totals 3452.16 17661.58 0.00 0.00 17661.58

11.3 Summary of loads and Moment @ base of abutment foundation for checking equilibrium as per Table B.1 of IRC:6-2017
For overturning For Overturning or Sliding For Restoring or Resisting
Load Cases Load HL HT Long Mom Tran Mom Restoring Overturnin Partial Partial Partial Factor Partial Partial Partial
Moment g Moment Factor of Factor of of Safety for Factor of Factor of Factor of
about Toe about Toe Safety for Safety for Seismic Safety for Safety for Safety for
Basic Accidental Combination Basic Accidental Seismic
Combinatio Combinatio Combinatio Combinatio Combinatio
n n n n n
Permanent Load during service
Dead Load of S.S 1056.83 0.00 0.00 79.26 0.00 -4940.68 1.10 1.00 1.10 0.90 1.00 0.90
SIDL (Except w.c.) 279.13 0.00 0.00 20.93 0.00 -1304.92 1.10 1.00 1.10 0.90 1.00 0.90
SIDL (only for w.c.) 112.68 0.00 0.00 8.45 0.00 -526.79 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Dead Load form Sub-Str & Found 5612.54 0.00 0.00 1353.11 0.00 -33153.14 1.10 1.00 1.10 0.90 1.00 0.90
Backfill weight 7099.04 0.00 0.00 -17588.5 0.00 -51308.95 1.10 1.00 1.10 0.90 1.00 0.90
Frontfill 3961.57 0.00 0.00 12065.00 0.00 -6752.47 1.10 1.00 1.10 0.90 1.00 0.90
Earthpressure due to backfill (Leading) 0.00 3314.55 0.00 16326.59 0.00 13116.86 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Permanent Load (During construction)
Dead Load of S.S 105.68 0.00 0.00 7.93 0.00 -494.07 1.10 1.00 1.10 0.90 1.00 0.90
SIDL (Except w.c.) 27.91 0.00 0.00 2.09 0.00 -130.49 1.10 1.00 1.10 0.90 1.00 0.90
SIDL (only for w.c.) 11.27 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.00 -52.68 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00 1.00 1.00
Dead Load form Sub-Str & Found 561.25 0.00 0.00 135.31 0.00 -3315.31 1.10 1.00 1.10 0.90 1.00 0.90
Backfill wieght 7099.04 0.00 0.00 -17588.5 0.00 -51308.95 1.10 1.00 1.10 0.90 1.00 0.90
Frontfill 3961.57 0.00 0.00 12065.00 0.00 -6752.47 1.10 1.00 1.10 0.90 1.00 0.90
Earthpressure due to backfill (Accompanying) 0.00 3314.55 0.00 16326.59 0.00 0.00 13116.86 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Variable Load (Leading)
Max LL (Leading) 770.84 0.00 0.00 235.11 905.58 -5375.55 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FPLL (Leading) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) 0.00 137.61 0.00 1334.99 0.00 1334.99 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) for Long Seis 0.00 37.61 0.00 364.89 0.00 0.00 364.89 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) for Trans Seis 0.00 57.61 0.00 558.91 0.00 0.00 558.91 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
A-1_19.36m Check for Equilibrium

Centrifugal Force (Leading) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Wind force (Leading) 48.91 43.60 174.40 496.30 1985.20 -496.30 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Variable Load (Accompanying)
Max LL (Accompanying) 770.84 0.00 0.00 235.11 905.58 -5375.55 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00
FPLL ((Accompanying)) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00
Max LL (Construction) 154.17 0.00 0.00 47.02 181.12 -1075.11 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00
Horizontal Force (Accompanying) 0.00 137.61 0.00 1334.99 0.00 0.00 1334.99 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) for Long Seis 0.00 37.61 0.00 364.89 0.00 0.00 364.89 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) for Trans Seis 0.00 57.61 0.00 558.91 0.00 0.00 558.91 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00
Centrifugal Force (Accomanying) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00
Wind force (Accompanying) 48.91 43.60 174.40 496.30 1985.20 -496.30 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Live Load Surcharge as accompanying 866.97 549.80 0.00 3209.72 0.00 3209.72 1.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Variable Load (During construction)
Max LL 77.08 0.00 0.00 23.51 90.56 -537.55 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FPLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Horizontal Force 15.42 0.00 0.00 4.70 18.11 -107.51 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Centrifugal Force 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Seismic Force (During Service)
Seismic Longitudinal 0.00 840.74 0.00 6375.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
Seismic Transverse 0.00 637.38 902.73 4402.39 6235.11 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
Seismic Force (During Construction)
Seismic Longitudinal 0.00 637.38 0.00 4402.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00
Seismic Transverse 0.00 0.00 902.73 0.00 6235.11 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00
A-1_19.36m Check for Equilibrium

11.4 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for Basic Combination
Coeff. of friction between rock and concrete = 0.70
Load Cases Allowable
Overturnin Allowable Check for
Long Mom Tran Mom Restoring Horizontal FOS against FOS against FOS against Check for
Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN) g Mom FOS against Overturnin
(KNM) (KNm) Mom (KNM) Force (KN) Sliding Overturning Overturnin Sliding
(KNm) Sliding g
g
Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom)
21162.41 5217.49 156.96 22825.88 3145.04 -116427.33 21677.78 5219.85 2.84 5.37 1.50 2.00 OK OK
Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Accompanying)+Wind Load (Leading)
22139.62 5855.24 261.60 26479.87 4227.49 -116080.05 25062.20 5861.08 2.64 4.63 1.50 2.00 OK OK
Case III- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During
service)
21233.76 5688.00 0.00 24493.60 271.67 -109530.01 24074.30 5688.00 2.61 4.55 1.25 1.50 OK OK
Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During
service)
21233.76 5718.00 0.00 24784.63 271.67 -109530.01 24365.33 5718.00 2.60 4.50 1.25 1.50 OK OK
Case V- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During service)

21179.80 5674.84 0.00 24349.43 208.28 -109153.72 23946.59 5674.84 2.61 4.56 1.25 1.50 OK OK
Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During
service)
21179.80 5697.84 0.00 24572.56 208.28 -109153.72 24169.71 5697.84 2.60 4.52 1.25 1.50 OK OK
Case VII- Permanent load (Construction)+Variable
load (Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction)

13071.09 4971.83 0.00 18613.11 146.70 -69143.37 19675.29 4971.83 1.84 3.51 1.25 1.50 OK OK
Case VIII- Permanent load (Construction)+Variable
load (Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction)

13071.09 4971.83 0.00 18613.11 146.70 -69143.37 19675.29 4971.83 1.84 3.51 1.25 1.50 OK OK
A-1_19.36m Check for Equilibrium

11.5 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for Accidental Combination

Load Cases Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN) Long Mom Tran Mom Restoring Overturnin Horizontal FOS against FOS against Allowable Allowable Check for
(KNM) (KNm) Mom (KNM) g Mom Force (KN) Sliding Overturning FOS against FOS against Check for Overturnin
(KNm) Sliding Overturnin Sliding
g
g
Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom) 18699.92 3417.76 0.00 13442.41 679.18 -102018.61 14118.10 3417.76 3.83 7.23 1.50 2.00 OK OK
Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Accompanying)+Wind Load (Leading) 18306.79 3342.07 0.00 12588.26 217.34 -99277.08 13383.86 3342.07 3.83 7.42 1.50 2.00 OK OK
Case III- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During
service)
18237.42 3342.76 0.00 12573.77 135.84 -98793.28 13390.53 3342.76 3.82 7.38 1.25 1.50 OK OK
Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During
service)
18237.42 3357.76 0.00 12719.28 135.84 -98793.28 13536.04 3357.76 3.80 7.30 1.25 1.50 OK OK
Case V- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During service)
18152.62 3322.07 0.00 12347.22 36.22 -98201.97 13189.84 3322.07 3.82 7.45 1.25 1.50 OK OK
Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During
service)
18153 3326 0 12386 36 -98202 13229 3326.07 3.82 7.42 1.25 1.50 OK OK
Case VII- Permanent load (Construction)+Variable
load (Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction)

11859 3315 0 10977 109 -62699 13117 3314.55 2.50 4.78 1.25 1.50 OK OK
Case VIII- Permanent load (Construction)+Variable
load (Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction)

11859 3315 0 10977 109 -62699 13117 3314.55 2.50 4.78 1.25 1.50 OK OK
A-1_19.36m Check for Equilibrium

11.6 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for Seismic Condition

Load Cases Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN) Long Mom Tran Mom Restoring Overturnin Horizontal FOS against FOS against Allowable Allowable Check for
(KNM) (KNm) Mom (KNM) g Mom Force (KN) Sliding Overturning FOS against FOS against Check for Overturnin
(KNm) Sliding Overturnin Sliding
g
g
Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom)
19962.14 3314.55 0.00 11860.77 0.00 -107917.34 13116.86 3314.55 4.22 8.23 1.50 2.00 OK OK
Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Accompanying)+Wind Load (Leading)
20147.14 3342.07 0.00 12184.19 217.34 -109207.47 13383.86 3342.07 4.22 8.16 1.50 2.00 OK OK
Case III- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During
19962.14 4575.65 0.00 21423.45 0.00 -107917.34 13116.86 4575.65 3.05 8.23 1.25 1.50 OK OK
service)
Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During
19962.14 4270.62 1354.09 18464.35 9352.67 -107917.34 13116.86 4480.15 3.12 8.23 1.25 1.50 OK OK
service)
Case V- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During service)

19992.97 4583.18 0.00 21505.84 36.22 -108132.36 13189.84 4583.18 3.05 8.20 1.25 1.50 OK OK
Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During
service)
19992.97 4282.15 1354.09 18585.54 9388.89 -108132.36 13228.64 4491.14 3.12 8.17 1.25 1.50 OK OK
Case VII- Permanent load (Construction)+Variable
load (Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction)

13038.72 3792.59 0.00 13741.73 108.67 -68917.60 13116.86 3792.59 2.41 5.25 1.25 1.50 OK OK
Case VIII- Permanent load (Construction)+Variable
load (Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction)

13038.72 3314.55 677.04 10439.94 4785.00 -68917.60 13116.86 3382.99 2.70 5.25 1.25 1.50 OK OK
A-1_19.36m Ncase Foundation Design

12.0 LOAD COMBINATION FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN:

12.1 Vertical Loads and Moments

S. No. Item Volume g P eL ML eT MT eToe Mtoe

3 3
(m ) (kN/m ) (kN) (m) (kNm) (m) (kNm) (m) (kNm)
1 Dead Load Reaction 1056.83 0.075 79.26 0.000 0.00 -4.675 -4940.68
2 SIDL Reaction (except w.c.) 279.13 0.075 20.93 0.000 0.00 -4.675 -1304.92
2 SIDL Reaction (due to w.c.) 112.68 0.075 8.45 0.000 0.00 -4.675 -526.79
3 FPLL Reaction 0.00 0.075 0.00 0.000 0.00 -4.675 0.00
3 CWLL Reaction 1149.85 0.075 86.24 905.58 -4.675 -5375.55
4 SIDL over Returns 0.00 KN/m 4.80 0.00 -2.650 0.00 0.000 0.00 -7.400 0.00
Dead Load of Sub Structure & Found
5 Dirt Wall 5.346 25.00 133.66 -0.400 -53.46 0.000 0.00 -5.150 -688.35
6 Abutment Cap (rectangular part) 4.563 25.00 114.08 0.350 39.93 0.000 0.00 -4.400 -501.93
7 Abutment Cap (Trapezoidal part) 4.183 25.00 104.57 0.350 36.60 0.000 0.00 -4.400 -460.11
8 Abutment Shaft upto Bed Level 4.652 25.00 116.30 0.500 58.15 0.000 0.00 -4.250 -494.25
9 Abutment Shaft below Bed Level 82.388 25.00 2059.69 0.500 1029.84 0.000 0.00 -4.250 -8753.67
10 Heel Slab Tapering 20.914 25.00 522.85 -1.750 -914.98 0.000 0.00 -6.500 -3398.49
11 between tapering heel and toe 13.943 25.00 348.56 0.500 174.28 0.000 0.00 -4.250 -1481.39
12 toe slab tapering 16.266 25.00 406.66 2.417 982.76 0.000 0.00 -2.333 -948.87
13 Heel Slab uniform 34.223 25.00 855.56 -2.500 -2138.91 0.000 0.00 -7.250 -6202.83
14 Between Uniform Heel and Toe 11.408 25.00 285.19 0.500 142.59 0.000 0.00 -4.250 -1212.05
15 Toe Slab Uniform 26.618 25.00 665.44 3.000 1996.31 0.000 0.00 -1.750 -1164.52
16 Cantilever Return Wall 0.000 25.00 0.00 -2.050 0.00 0.000 0.00 -6.800 0.00
17 Solid Return wall 45.161 25.00 1129.02 -2.200 -2483.84 0.000 0.00 -6.950 -7846.69
Backfill Component
18 Above Heel Slab upto bottom of shaft(9) 20.914 19.00 397.36 -3.250 -1291.42 0.000 0.00 -8.000 -3178.89
19 From bottom of shaft upto bed level(10) 247.163 19.00 4696.09 -2.500 -11740.22 0.000 0.00 -7.250 -34046.63
20 From bed level upto bottom of cap(11) 13.955 19.00 265.15 -2.500 -662.87 0.000 0.00 -7.250 -1922.33
21 From bottom of cap to bottom of dirt wall(12) 11.408 19.00 216.74 -2.500 -541.86 0.000 0.00 -7.250 -1571.38
22 From bottom of dirt wall upto top(13) 80.195 19.00 1523.70 -2.200 -3352.14 0.000 0.00 -6.950 -10589.71
Frontfill Component
23 GL to bottom of Shaft 192.238 19.00 3652.51 3.000 10957.54 0.000 0.00 -1.750 -6391.90
24 Above toe slab 16.266 19.00 309.06 3.583 1107.46 0.000 0.00 -1.167 -360.57

Totals 20400.66 -6459.36 905.58 -103362.50

A-1_19.36m Ncase Foundation Design

12.2 Horizontal Forces and Moments @ RL 91.221 m

S. No. Item Length Height Unit Weight Pressure Horizontal Eccentricity Moment Height Pressure Horizontal Eccentricity Moment Moment
p in Force @ Base of @ Base of p in Force @ Base of @ Base of about toe,
longitudal HL abutment abutment transverse HT return wall return wall ML
direction eL ML direction eT MT
(m) (m) 3 2 (KN) (m) (KNm) (m) (KN/m^2) (KN) (m) (KNm)
(KN/m ) (KN/m )
(kNm)
1 Longitudinal Force at Bearing Level 137.61 9.70 1334.99 0.00 9.70 0.00 1334.99
2 Centrifugal Force above deck level 0.00 12.88 0.00 0.00 12.88 0.00 0.00
3 Live Load Surcharge Pressure 8.450 1.20 19.00 5.57 549.80 5.84 3209.72 1.20 5.57 0.00 6.29 0.00 3209.72
4 Active Earth Pressure 8.450 11.68 19.00 54.22 2674.77 4.90 13116.86 11.68 54.22 0.00 9.95 0.00 13116.86
5 Minimum Fluid Pressure 8.450 11.68 4.80 56.04 2764.75 3.89 10760.41 11.68 56.04 0.00 4.79 0.00 10760.41
6 Governing Pressure 2764.75 13116.86 0.00 0.00 13116.86
Totals 3452.16 17661.58 0.00 0.00 17661.58

12.3 Summary of loads and Moment @ base of abutment foundation for design of foundation as per Table B.4 of IRC:6-2017

Load HL HT Long Mom Tran Mom Partial Factor Partial Factor Partial Factor Partial Factor Partial Factor
of Safety for of Safety for of Safety for of Safety for of Safety for
Combination- Combination- seismic Accidental Quasi-
I II combination Combination permanent
Combination
Load Cases
Permanent Load during service
Dead Load of S.S 1056.83 0.00 0.00 79.26 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00 1.00
SIDL (Except w.c.) 279.13 0.00 0.00 20.93 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00 1.00
SIDL (only for w.c.) 112.68 0.00 0.00 8.45 0.00 1.75 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.20
Dead Load form Sub-Str & Found 5612.54 0.00 0.00 1353.11 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00 1.00
Backfill wieght 7099.04 0.00 0.00 -17588.51 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00
Frontfill 3961.57 0.00 0.00 12065.00 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00
Earthpressure due to backfill (Leading) 0.00 3314.55 0.00 16326.59 0.00 1.50 1.30 1.00 1.00 1.00
Permanent Load (During construction)
Dead Load of S.S 105.68 0.00 0.00 7.93 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00 1.00
SIDL (Except w.c.) 27.91 0.00 0.00 2.09 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00 1.00
SIDL (only for w.c.) 11.27 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.00 1.75 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00
Dead Load form Sub-Str & Found 561.25 0.00 0.00 135.31 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00 1.00
Backfill wieght 7099.04 0.00 0.00 -17588.51 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00
Frontfill 3961.57 0.00 0.00 12065.00 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00
Earthpressure due to backfill (Accompanying) 0.00 3314.55 0.00 16326.59 0.00 1.50 1.30 0.00 0.00 1.00
Variable Load (Leading)
Max LL (Leading) 770.84 0.00 0.00 235.11 905.58 1.50 1.30 0.75 0.75 0.00
FPLL (Leading) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 1.30 0.75 0.75 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) 0.00 137.61 0.00 1334.99 0.00 1.50 1.30 0.75 0.75 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) for Long Seis 0.00 37.61 0.00 364.89 0.00 1.50 1.30 0.75 0.75 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) for Trans Seis 0.00 57.61 0.00 558.91 0.00 1.50 1.30 0.75 0.75 0.00
Centrifugal Force (Leading) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 1.30 0.75 0.75 0.00
A-1_19.36m Ncase Foundation Design

Wind force (Leading) 48.91 43.60 174.40 496.30 1985.20 1.50 1.30 0.00 0.00 0.00
Variable Load (Accompanying)
Max LL (Accompanying) 770.84 0.00 0.00 235.11 905.58 1.15 1.00 0.20 0.20 0.00
FPLL ((Accompanying)) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15 1.00 0.20 0.20 0.00
Erection Effect 154.17 0.00 0.00 47.02 181.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Horizontal Force (Accompanying) 0.00 137.61 0.00 1334.99 0.00 1.15 1.00 0.20 0.20 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) for Long Seis 0.00 37.61 0.00 364.89 0.00 1.15 1.00 0.20 0.20 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) for Trans Seis 0.00 57.61 0.00 558.91 0.00 1.15 1.00 0.20 0.20 0.00
Centrifugal Force (Accomanying) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15 1.00 0.20 0.20 0.00
Wind force (Accompanying) 48.91 43.60 174.40 496.30 1985.20 0.90 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.50
Live Load Surcharge as accompanying 866.97 549.80 0.00 3209.72 0.00 1.20 1.00 0.20 0.20 0.00
Variable Load (During construction)
Max LL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FPLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Horizontal Force 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Centrifugal Force 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Seismic Force (During Service)
Seismic Longitudinal 0.00 840.74 0.00 6375.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 1.00 0.00
Seismic Transverse 0.00 637.38 902.73 4402.39 6235.11 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.50 0.00
Seismic Force (During Construction)
Seismic Longitudinal 0.00 637.38 0.00 4402.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 1.00 0.00
Seismic Transverse 0.00 0.00 902.73 0.00 6235.11 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.50 0.00

12.4 Summary of loads and Moment @ base of abutment foundation for design of toe foundation as per Table B.4 of IRC:6-2017

Load HL HT Long Mom Tran Mom Partial Factor Partial Factor Partial Factor Partial Factor Partial Factor
of Safety for of Safety for of Safety for of Safety for of Safety for
Combination- Combination- seismic Accidental Quasi-
I II combination Combination permanent
Combination
Load Cases
Permanent Load
Dead Load Found 391.26 1638.95 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00 1.00
Frontfill 1742.18 7113.03 1.35 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00

12.5 Summary of loads and Moment @ base of abutment foundation for design of heel foundation as per Table B.4 of IRC:6-2017

Load HL HT Long Mom Tran Mom Partial Factor Partial Factor Partial Factor Partial Factor Partial Factor
of Safety for of Safety for of Safety for of Safety for of Safety for
Combination- Combination- seismic Accidental Quasi-
I II combination Combination permanent
Combination
Load Cases
Permanent Load
Dead Load Found 1378.42 2417.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00 1.00
Backfill 6247.40 16752.07 1.35 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00
A-1_19.36m Ncase Foundation Design

12.6 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for Combination-I
Long Mom Tran Mom For Toe SlabLong Mom
Design For Heel SlabLong Mom
Design
Load Cases Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN) (KNM) (KNm) Load (KN) (KNM) Load (KN) (KNM)

Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL 25709.76 5217.49 156.96 21811.71 3145.04 2880.14 11815.18 10294.9 25878
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom)
Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL 26509.68 5855.24 261.60 25411.62 4019.21 2880.14 11815.18 10294.86 25878
(Accompanying)+Wind Load (Leading)
Case III- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During 25781.11 5688.00 0.00 23479.43 271.67 2880.14 11815.18 10294.86 25878
service)

Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL

25781.11 5718.00 0.00 23770.46 271.67 2880.14 11815.18 10294.86 25878
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During
service)

Case V- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL

25727.15 5674.84 0.00 23335.26 208.28 2880.14 11815.18 10294.86 25878
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During
service)

Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL

25727.15 5697.84 0.00 23558.39 208.28 2880.14 11815.18 10294.86 25878
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During
service)

Case VII- Permanent load 15889.59 4971.83 0.00 17230.81 0.00 2880.14 11815.18 10294.86 25878
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction)

Case VIII- Permanent load 15889.59 4971.83 0.00 17230.81 0.00 2880.14 11815.18 10294.86 25878
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction)
A-1_19.36m Ncase Foundation Design

12.7 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for Combination-II
Long Mom Tran Mom For Toe SlabLong Mom
Design For Heel SlabLong Mom
Design
Load Cases Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN) (KNM) (KNm) Load (KN) (KNM) Load (KN) (KNM)

Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL 19163.00 4522.69 139.52 19600.97 2765.41 2133.44 8751.98 7625.8 19169
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom)

Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL 19823.18 5053.01 226.72 22587.82 3486.33 2133.44 8751.98 7625.82 19169
(Accompanying)+Wind Load (Leading)

Case III- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL

19189.18 4907.61 0.00 20908.02 235.45 2133.44 8751.98 7625.82 19169
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During
service)

Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During 19189.18 4933.61 0.00 21160.25 235.45 2133.44 8751.98 7625.82 19169
service)

Case V- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During 19142.93 4896.33 0.00 20784.45 181.12 2133.44 8751.98 7625.82 19169
service)

Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During 19142.93 4916.33 0.00 20978.47 181.12 2133.44 8751.98 7625.82 19169
service)

Case VII- Permanent load 11766.73 4308.92 0.00 15847.23 0.00 2133.44 8751.98 7625.82 19169
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction)

Case VIII- Permanent load 11766.73 4308.92 0.00 15847.23 0.00 2133.44 8751.98 7625.82 19169
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction)
A-1_19.36m Ncase Foundation Design

12.8 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for Seismic Condition
Long Mom Tran Mom For Toe SlabLong Mom
Design For Heel SlabLong Mom
Design
Load Cases Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN) (KNM) (KNm) Load (KN) (KNM) Load (KN) (KNM)

Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL 29511.86 3417.76 0.00 9814.77 679.18 3577.01 14660.39 12793.82 32579
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom)
Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL 29261.30 3452.03 0.00 9593.16 181.12 3577.01 14660.39 12793.82 32579
(Accompanying)+Wind Load (Leading)
Case III- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During 29222.75 4713.82 0.00 19150.76 135.84 3577.01 14660.39 12793.82 32579
service)

Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During 29222.75 4423.79 1354.09 16337.17 9488.50 3577.01 14660.39 12793.82 32579
service)

Case V- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During 29137.96 4693.14 0.00 18924.21 36.22 3577.01 14660.39 12793.82 32579
service)

Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL

29137.96 4392.11 1354.09 16003.91 9388.89 3577.01 14660.39 12793.82 32579
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During
service)

Case VII- Permanent load 20313.84 1261.10 0.00 94.21 0.00 3577.01 14660.39 12793.82 32579
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction)

Case VIII- Permanent load 20313.84 956.07 1354.09 -2864.89 9352.67 3577.01 14660.39 12793.82 32579
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction)
A-1_19.36m Ncase Foundation Design

12.9 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for Accidental Case
Long Mom Tran Mom For Toe SlabLong Mom
Design For Heel SlabLong Mom
Design
Load Cases Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN) (KNM) (KNm) Load (KN) (KNM) Load (KN) (KNM)

Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL 18699.92 3417.76 0.00 13442.41 679.18 2133.44 8751.98 7625.82 19169
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom)

Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL 18449.35 3452.03 0.00 13220.80 181.12 2133.44 8751.98 7625.82 19169
(Accompanying)+Wind Load (Leading)
Case III- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During 18237.42 4175.93 0.00 18875.47 135.84 2133.44 8751.98 7625.82 19169
service)

Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During 18187.30 4182.78 0.00 18831.15 36.22 2133.44 8751.98 7625.82 19169
service)

Case V- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL

11766.73 318.69 451.36 -3176.14 3117.56 2133.44 8751.98 7625.82 19169
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During
service)

Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During 18326.02 3754.72 451.36 15229.16 3153.78 2133.44 8751.98 7625.82 19169
service)

Case VII- Permanent load 11766.73 840.74 0.00 997.79 0.00 2133.44 8751.98 7625.82 19169
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction)

Case VIII- Permanent load 11766.73 318.69 451.36 -3176.14 3117.56 2133.44 8751.98 7625.82 19169
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction)
A-1_19.36m Ncase Foundation Design

12.10 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for Quasi-permanent Cases
Long Mom Tran Mom For Toe SlabLong Mom
Design For Heel SlabLong Mom
Design
Load Cases Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN) (KNM) (KNm) Load (KN) (KNM) Load (KN) (KNM)

Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL 18144.33 3314.55 0.00 12266.52 0.00 2133.44 8751.98 7625.82 19169
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom)

Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL 18168.78 3336.35 87.20 12514.67 992.60 2133.44 8751.98 7625.82 19169.07
(Accompanying)+Wind Load (Leading)

Case III- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During 18144.33 3314.55 0.00 12266.52 0.00 2133.44 8751.98 7625.82 19169.07
service)

Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During 18149.22 3318.91 17.44 12316.15 198.52 2133.44 8751.98 7625.82 19169.07
service)

Case V- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL

18144.33 3314.55 0.00 12266.52 0.00 2133.44 8751.98 7625.82 19169.07
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During
service)

Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL

18144.33 3314.55 0.00 12266.52 0.00 2133.44 8751.98 7625.82 19169.07
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During
service)

Case VII- Permanent load 11766.73 3314.55 0.00 10949.25 0.00 2133.44 8751.98 7625.82 19169.07
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction)

Case VIII- Permanent load 11766.73 3314.55 0.00 10949.25 0.00 2133.44 8751.98 7625.82 19169.07
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction)
A-1_19.36m Foundation Design Summary

13.0 Design of Footing

The design is done for the critical cases of Normal, Wind and Seismic (Factored Loads/ Moments )
0 8.45 0
TOE
3.50

PLAN
9.50 1.50 1.50

8.45 4.50
HEEL
8.45

8500
SECTION

1100
900

3500 1500 4500

P2 P4 P3 P1

length width
Size of the Footing = 8.45 x 9.50 m
Depth of the Footing = 2.00 m
2
C/S Area of footing = 80 m
2 3
Section Modulus ZL 9.50 x 8.45 = 113.05 m
6
2 3
ZT 8.45 x 9.50 = 127.10 m
6
For design of footing, the net pressure is considered Hence, overburden is not considered.

Selfweight of footing =
Volume of rectangular part 8.5 X 9.50 X 0.9 = 72.248 m3

Volume of trapezoidal section part A1 = 8.45 X 1.50 = 12.675 m2

A2 = 8.45 X 9.50 = 80.275 m2

Volume (A1 + A2 + A1 x A 2 ) X H = 45.778 m3

3
Total Volume = 118.025 m3

Therefore selfweight of foundation = 2950.63 KN

Confidential 7/10/2021 Page 39

A-1_19.36m Foundation Design Summary

13.1 For Combination I

For longitudnal direction
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8

Case III- Case IV- Case V- Case VI- Case VII- Case VIII-
Case-II- Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent
Case- I-
Permanent Load+ 20% Load+ 20% Load+ 20% Load+ 20% load load
Permanent
load(Service) LL(Leading) LL(Leading) LL(Accom) LL(Accom) (Constructio (Construction)
load(Service)
+LL +LL +LL +LL +LL n)+Variable +Variable
+LL
(Accompanyi Surcharge Surcharge Surcharge Surcharge load load
(Leading)+W
ng)+Wind (Accom) (Accom) (Accom) (Accom) (Constructio (Construction)
ind Load
Load +Seismic_Lo +Seismic_Tr +Seismic_Lo +Seismic_Tr n)+Seismic_L +Seismic_Tran
(Accom)
(Leading) ng (During ans (During ng (During ans (During ong(Constru s(Constructio
service) service) service) service) ction) n)

P 25709.76 26509.68 25781.11 25781.11 25727.15 25727.15 15889.59 15889.59

ML 21811.71 25411.62 23479.43 23770.46 23335.26 23558.39 17230.81 17230.81
MT 3145.04 4019.21 271.67 271.67 208.28 208.28 0.00 0.00
P/A (a) 320.27 330.24 321.16 321.16 320.49 320.49 197.94 197.94
ML/ZL (b) 192.93 224.77 207.68 210.26 206.41 208.38 152.41 152.41
MT/ZT © 24.74 31.62 2.14 2.14 1.64 1.64 0.00 0.00
a+b+c 537.95 586.63 530.98 533.55 528.53 530.51 350.35 350.35
a-b+c 152.08 137.08 115.61 113.04 115.72 113.74 45.53 45.53
a+b-c 488.46 523.39 526.71 529.28 525.26 527.23 350.35 350.35
a-b-c 102.60 73.84 111.34 108.76 112.44 110.47 45.53 45.53
P1 537.95 586.63 530.98 533.55 528.53 530.51 350.35 350.35
P2 152.08 137.08 115.61 113.04 115.72 113.74 45.53 45.53
P3 334.86 350.03 312.37 312.23 311.26 311.16 189.92 189.92
P4 355.17 373.69 334.23 334.36 332.99 333.09 205.96 205.96
Avg Pre. In toe 253.63 255.39 224.92 223.70 224.35 223.42 125.74 125.74
Avg Pre. In Heel 436.40 468.33 421.67 422.89 419.90 420.83 270.13 270.13
CG of varying pr. For heel From face of shaft 2.42 2.44 2.44 2.45 2.44 2.45 2.47 2.47
CG of varying pr. For toe from face of shaft 1.98 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.03 2.04 2.12 2.12
Upward Moment in Toe 14878.59 15258.76 13526.84 13487.10 13485.92 13455.46 7891.96 7891.96
Downward Moment in Toe 11815.18 11815.18 11815.18 11815.18 11815.18 11815.18 11815.18 11815.18
Net upward Moment in Toe 3063.41 3443.59 1711.66 1671.93 1670.75 1640.28 -3923.22 -3923.22
Upward Moment in Heel 32915.49 35976.51 32605.24 32781.18 32451.56 32586.13 21798.26 21798.26
Downward Moment in Heel 25878.24 25878.24 25878.24 25878.24 25878.24 25878.24 25878.24 25878.24
Net Upward Moment in Heel 7037.24 10098.26 6726.99 6902.94 6573.32 6707.88 -4079.98 -4079.98
d effective (m)= 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89
Upward Shear in Toe= 3444.03 3467.92 3054.23 3037.68 3046.54 3033.84 1707.50 1707.50
Downward Shear in Toe= 2880.14 2880.14 2880.14 2880.14 2880.14 2880.14 2880.14 2880.14
Net upward Shear in Toe= 563.89 587.78 174.09 157.54 166.40 153.70 -1172.64 -1172.64
Upward Shear in Heel= 9613.61 10316.90 9289.11 9315.97 9250.01 9270.60 5950.84 5950.84
Downward Shear in Heel= 10294.86 10294.86 10294.86 10294.86 10294.86 10294.86 10294.86 10294.86
Net Upward Shear in Heel= -681.25 22.05 -1005.75 -978.88 -1044.85 -1024.25 -4344.02 -4344.02
Punching Shear at 2d 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79
Punching Shear = 1158.29 1194.33 1161.51 1161.51 1159.08 1159.08 715.87 715.87
Net Punch. Sh = 1158.29 1194.33 1161.51 1161.51 1159.08 1159.08 715.87 715.87
For Transverse Direction
P1 537.95 586.63 530.98 533.55 528.53 530.51 350.35 350.35
P3 334.86 350.03 312.37 312.23 311.26 311.16 189.92 189.92
P2 152.08 137.08 115.61 113.04 115.72 113.74 45.53 45.53
P4 355.17 373.69 334.23 334.36 332.99 333.09 205.96 205.96
Avg Pre. In toe 253.63 468.33 421.67 422.89 419.90 420.83 270.13 270.13
Avg Pre. In Heel 436.40 468.33 421.67 422.89 419.90 420.83 270.13 270.13
transverse ecc in for toe -0.56 -0.65 -0.68 -0.70 -0.68 -0.69 -0.90 -0.90
transverse ecc in for heel -0.33 -0.36 -0.37 -0.37 -0.36 -0.37 -0.42 -0.42
Net Upward Moment in Toe -4229.42 -9036.05 -8535.42 -8713.45 -8468.65 -8604.51 -7177.77 -7177.77
Net Upward Moment in Heel -5437.82 -6335.31 -5853.60 -5926.15 -5817.66 -5873.28 -4295.77 -4295.77
d effective (m)= 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89
Shear at face of column= 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Net Shear = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Longitudinal Transverse
Toe Heel Toe Heel
Design Moment = 3443.59 -4079.98 -4229.42 -4295.77
Design Shear = 587.78 22.05 0.00 0.00
Design Punching shear= 1194.33 kN

Check for effective width for long dirn

C+3d = 1.50 + 5.68 = 7.18 < 9.50 use eff width
Check for effective width for trans dirn
C+3d = 8.45 + 5.68 = 14.13 > 8.45 OK

Perimeter for Punching Shear

Perimeter = 5.286 X 4 = 21.144 mX 1.89 = 40.03 sqm
Punching shear stress = 1158.29 / 40.03 = 28.94 kN/sqm
= 0.03 Mpa OK
K= 1+√200/d = 1.325
ⱴmin= 0.031k3/2fck1/2 = 0.236 Mpa

Confidential 7/10/2021 Page 40

A-1_19.36m Foundation Design Summary

13.2 For Combination II

For longitudnal direction
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 5 Case 7 Case 6
Case- I- Case-II- Case III- Case IV- Case V- Case VI- Case VII- Case VIII-
Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent
load(Service) load(Service) Load+ 20% Load+ 20% Load+ 20% Load+ 20% load load
+LL +LL LL(Leading) LL(Leading) LL(Accom) LL(Accom) (Constructio (Construction)
(Leading)+W (Accompanyi +LL +LL +LL +LL n)+Variable +Variable
ind Load ng)+Wind Surcharge Surcharge Surcharge Surcharge load load
(Accom) Load (Accom) (Accom) (Accom) (Accom) (Constructio (Construction)
(Leading) +Seismic_Lo +Seismic_Tr +Seismic_Lo +Seismic_Tr n)+Seismic_L +Seismic_Tran
ng (During ans (During ng (During ans (During ong(Constru s(Constructio
service) service) service) service) ction) n)

P 19163.00 19823.18 19189.18 19189.18 19142.93 19142.93 11766.73 11766.73

ML 19600.97 22587.82 20908.02 21160.25 20784.45 20978.47 15847.23 15847.23
MT 2765.41 3486.33 235.45 235.45 181.12 181.12 0.00 0.00
P/A (a) 238.72 246.94 239.04 239.04 238.47 238.47 146.58 146.58
ML/ZL (b) 173.38 199.80 184.94 187.17 183.85 185.56 140.17 140.17
MT/ZT © 21.76 27.43 1.85 1.85 1.42 1.42 0.00 0.00
MT/ZT © 1.88 1.94 1.88 1.88 1.88 1.88 1.15 1.15
a+b+c 197.01 229.17 188.67 190.90 187.15 188.86 141.33 141.33
a-b+c 153.50 174.31 184.97 187.20 184.30 186.01 141.33 141.33
a+b-c 193.26 225.28 184.91 187.14 183.39 185.11 139.02 139.02
a-b-c 149.74 170.42 181.21 183.44 180.54 182.26 139.02 139.02
P1 197.01 229.17 188.67 190.90 187.15 188.86 141.33 141.33
P2 153.50 174.31 184.97 187.20 184.30 186.01 141.33 141.33
P3 174.11 200.30 186.72 188.95 185.65 187.36 141.33 141.33
P4 176.40 203.18 186.92 189.15 185.80 187.51 141.33 141.33
Avg Pre. In toe 164.95 188.75 185.94 188.17 185.05 186.76 141.33 141.33
Avg Pre. In Heel 185.56 214.73 187.70 189.93 186.40 188.11 141.33 141.33
CG of varying pr. From tip of Heel 2.20 2.20 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25
CG of varying pr. From tip of Toe 1.71 1.71 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75
Upward Moment in Toe 8339.59 9519.77 9606.82 9722.29 9564.38 9653.20 7314.57 7314.57
Downward Moment in Toe 8751.98 8751.98 8751.98 8751.98 8751.98 8751.98 8751.98 8751.98
Net upward Moment in Toe -412.39 767.78 854.84 970.31 812.40 901.22 -1437.41 -1437.41
Upward Moment in Heel 12062.21 13924.80 12468.21 12616.67 12386.77 12500.97 9404.45 9404.45
Downward Moment in Heel 19169.07 19169.07 19169.07 19169.07 19169.07 19169.07 19169.07 19169.07
Net Upward Moment in Heel -7106.86 -5244.27 -6700.86 -6552.40 -6782.30 -6668.10 -9764.62 -9764.62
d effective (m)= 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89
Upward Shear in Toe= 2239.87 2563.02 2524.93 2555.23 2512.78 2536.08 1919.10 1919.10
Downward Shear in Toe= 2133.44 2133.44 2133.44 2133.44 2133.44 2133.44 2133.44 2133.44
Net upward Shear in Toe= 106.43 429.58 391.49 421.79 379.34 402.64 -214.33 -214.33
Upward Shear in Heel= 4087.76 4730.37 4134.80 4183.94 4106.16 4143.96 3113.32 3113.32
Downward Shear in Heel= 7625.82 7625.82 7625.82 7625.82 7625.82 7625.82 7625.82 7625.82
Net Upward Shear in Heel= -3538.06 -2895.45 -3491.02 -3441.88 -3519.66 -3481.86 -4512.50 -4512.50
Punching Shear at 2d 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79
Punching Shear = 627.04 722.59 668.85 676.92 664.90 671.10 506.95 506.95
Net Punch. Sh = 627.04 722.59 668.85 676.92 664.90 671.10 506.95 506.95
For Transverse Direction
P1 197.01 229.17 188.67 190.90 187.15 188.86 141.33 141.33
P3 174.11 200.30 186.72 188.95 185.65 187.36 141.33 141.33
P2 153.50 174.31 184.97 187.20 184.30 186.01 141.33 141.33
P4 176.40 203.18 186.92 189.15 185.80 187.51 141.33 141.33
Avg Pre. In toe 164.95 214.73 187.70 189.93 186.40 188.11 141.33 141.33
Avg Pre. In Heel 185.56 214.73 187.70 189.93 186.40 188.11 141.33 141.33
CG of varying pr. In toe 4.32 4.33 4.23 4.23 4.23 4.23 4.23 4.23
CG of varying pr. In Heel 4.31 4.32 4.23 4.23 4.23 4.23 4.23 4.23
Moment in Toe 57239.08 74685.89 63770.80 64527.46 63304.00 63886.06 47932.82 47932.82
Moment in Heel 64229.97 74461.19 63769.76 64526.44 63303.38 63885.44 47932.82 47932.82
d effective (m)= 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89
Shear at face of column= 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Net Shear = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Longitudinal Transverse
Toe Heel Toe Heel
Design Moment = 970.31 -9764.62 74685.89 74461.19
Design Shear = 429.58 -2895.45 0.00 0.00
Design Punching shear= 722.59 kN

Check for effective width for long dirn

C+3d = 1.50 + 5.68 = 7.18 < 9.50 use eff width
Check for effective width for trans dirn
C+3d = 8.45 + 5.68 = 14.13 > 8.45 OK
Perimeter for Punching Shear
Perimeter = 5 X 4 = 21 mX 1.89 = 40.03 sqm
Punching shear stress = 722.59 / 40.03 = 18.05 kN/sqm
= 0.02 Mpa OK

Confidential 7/10/2021 Page 41

A-1_19.36m Foundation Design Summary

13.3 For Seismic Combination

For longitudnal direction
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8
Case- I- Case-II- Case III- Case IV- Case V- Case VI- Case VII- Case VIII-
Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent
load(Service) load(Service) Load+ 20% Load+ 20% Load+ 20% Load+ 20% load load
+LL +LL LL(Leading) LL(Leading) LL(Accom) LL(Accom) (Constructio (Construction)
(Leading)+W (Accompanyi +LL +LL +LL +LL n)+Variable +Variable
ind Load ng)+Wind Surcharge Surcharge Surcharge Surcharge load load
(Accom) Load (Accom) (Accom) (Accom) (Accom) (Constructio (Construction)
(Leading) +Seismic_Lo +Seismic_Tr +Seismic_Lo +Seismic_Tr n)+Seismic_L +Seismic_Tran
ng (During ans (During ng (During ans (During ong(Constru s(Constructio
service) service) service) service) ction) n)

P 29511.86 29261.30 29222.75 29222.75 29137.96 29137.96 20313.84 20313.84

ML 9814.77 9593.16 19150.76 16337.17 18924.21 16003.91 94.21 -2864.89
MT 679.18 181.12 135.84 9488.50 36.22 9388.89 0.00 9352.67
P/A (a) 367.63 364.51 364.03 364.03 362.98 362.98 253.05 253.05
ML/ZL (b) 86.81 84.85 169.39 144.51 167.39 141.56 0.83 -25.34
MT/ZT © 5.34 1.42 1.07 74.65 0.28 73.87 0.00 73.58
a+b+c 459.79 450.79 534.50 583.19 530.65 578.41 253.89 301.30
a-b+c 286.16 281.08 195.71 294.18 195.87 295.29 252.22 351.98
a+b-c 449.11 447.94 532.36 433.89 530.08 430.67 253.89 154.13
a-b-c 275.48 278.23 193.57 144.87 195.30 147.55 252.22 204.81
P1 459.79 450.79 534.50 583.19 530.65 578.41 253.89 301.30
P2 286.16 281.08 195.71 294.18 195.87 295.29 252.22 351.98
P3 368.41 361.47 356.19 431.08 354.45 429.40 253.01 327.97
P4 377.55 370.40 374.02 446.29 372.07 444.30 253.10 325.30
Avg Pre. In toe 331.86 325.74 284.86 370.23 283.97 369.79 252.66 338.64
Avg Pre. In Heel 414.10 406.13 445.34 507.14 442.55 503.90 253.45 314.63
CG of varying pr. From tip of Heel 2.17 2.17 2.10 2.14 2.10 2.14 2.25 2.28
CG of varying pr. From tip of Toe 1.67 1.67 1.57 1.63 1.57 1.63 1.75 1.77
Upward Moment in Toe 16387.30 16088.79 13205.28 17849.82 13177.38 17853.62 13069.08 17756.86
Downward Moment in Toe 14660.39 14660.39 14660.39 14660.39 14660.39 14660.39 14660.39 14660.39
Net upward Moment in Toe 1726.91 1428.40 -1455.11 3189.43 -1483.01 3193.24 -1591.31 3096.47
Upward Moment in Heel 26291.14 25790.48 26543.04 31435.93 26403.61 31279.46 16855.61 21211.75
Downward Moment in Heel 32579.07 32579.07 32579.07 32579.07 32579.07 32579.07 32579.07 32579.07
Net Upward Moment in Heel -6287.93 -6788.59 -6036.04 -1143.14 -6175.46 -1299.61 -15723.46 -11367.32
d effective (m)= 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89
Upward Shear in Toe= 4506.31 4423.32 3868.19 5027.47 3856.09 5021.45 3430.89 4598.45
Downward Shear in Toe= 3577.01 3577.01 3577.01 3577.01 3577.01 3577.01 3577.01 3577.01
Net upward Shear in Toe= 929.30 846.31 291.17 1450.46 279.08 1444.44 -146.13 1021.44
Upward Shear in Heel= 9122.29 8946.75 9810.49 11171.79 9749.05 11100.50 5583.24 6931.11
Downward Shear in Heel= 12793.82 12793.82 12793.82 12793.82 12793.82 12793.82 12793.82 12793.82
Net Upward Shear in Heel= -3671.52 -3847.06 -2983.32 -1622.03 -3044.77 -1693.32 -7210.58 -5862.71
Punching Shear at 2d 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79
Punching Shear = 1329.59 1318.30 1316.56 1316.56 1312.74 1312.74 915.19 915.19
Net Punch. Sh = 1329.59 1318.30 1316.56 1316.56 1312.74 1312.74 915.19 915.19
For Transverse Direction
P1 459.79 450.79 534.50 583.19 530.65 578.41 253.89 301.30
P3 368.41 361.47 356.19 431.08 354.45 429.40 253.01 327.97
P2 286.16 281.08 195.71 294.18 195.87 295.29 252.22 351.98
P4 377.55 370.40 374.02 446.29 372.07 444.30 253.10 325.30
Avg Pre. In toe 331.86 406.13 445.34 507.14 442.55 503.90 253.45 314.63
Avg Pre. In Heel 414.10 406.13 445.34 507.14 442.55 503.90 253.45 314.63
CG of varying pr. In toe 4.42 4.42 4.67 4.51 4.66 4.51 4.23 4.17
CG of varying pr. In Heel 4.38 4.38 4.51 4.44 4.51 4.43 4.23 4.17
Moment in Toe 117718.33 144039.71 166800.47 183779.44 165619.07 182381.66 86009.58 105310.71
Moment in Heel 145612.94 142793.69 161122.19 180599.96 160056.95 179326.91 86009.42 105203.82
d effective (m)= 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89
Shear at face of column= 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Net Shear = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Longitudinal Transverse
Toe Heel Toe Heel
Design Moment = 3193.24 -15723.46 183779.44 180599.96
Design Shear = 1450.46 -1622.03 0.00 0.00
Design Punching shear= 3.79 kN
Check for effective width for long dirn
C+3d = 1.50 + 5.68 = 7.18 < 9.50 use eff width
Check for effective width for trans dirn
C+3d = 8.45 + 5.68 = 14.13 > 8.45 OK

Perimeter for Punching Shear

Perimeter = 5.29 X 4.00 = 21.1 mX 1.89 = 40.03 sqm
Punching shear stress = 0.00 / 40.03 = 0.00 kN/sqm
= 0.00 Mpa OK

Confidential 7/10/2021 Page 42

A-1_19.36m Foundation Design Summary

13.4 For Accidental Combination

For longitudnal direction
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8
Case- I- Case-II- Case III- Case IV- Case V- Case VI- Case VII- Case VIII-
Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent
load(Service) load(Service) Load+ 20% Load+ 20% Load+ 20% Load+ 20% load load
+LL +LL LL(Leading) LL(Leading) LL(Accom) LL(Accom) (Constructio (Construction)
(Leading)+W (Accompanyi +LL +LL +LL +LL n)+Variable +Variable
ind Load ng)+Wind Surcharge Surcharge Surcharge Surcharge load load
(Accom) Load (Accom) (Accom) (Accom) (Accom) (Constructio (Construction)
(Leading) +Seismic_Lo +Seismic_Tr +Seismic_Lo +Seismic_Tr n)+Seismic_L +Seismic_Tran
ng (During ans (During ng (During ans (During ong(Constru s(Constructio
service) service) service) service) ction) n)

P 18699.92 18449.35 18237.42 18187.30 11766.73 18326.02 11766.73 11766.73

ML 13442.41 13220.80 18875.47 18831.15 -3176.14 15229.16 997.79 -3176.14
MT 679.18 181.12 135.84 36.22 3117.56 3153.78 0.00 3117.56
P/A (a) 232.95 229.83 227.19 226.56 146.58 228.29 146.58 146.58
ML/ZL (b) 118.90 116.94 166.96 166.57 -28.09 134.71 8.83 -28.09
MT/ZT © 5.34 1.42 1.07 0.28 24.53 24.81 0.00 24.53
a+b+c 357.19 348.19 395.22 393.42 143.01 387.81 155.41 143.01
a-b+c 119.39 114.31 61.30 60.28 199.20 118.40 137.75 199.20
a+b-c 346.51 345.34 393.08 392.85 93.96 338.18 155.41 93.96
a-b-c 108.70 111.46 59.16 59.71 150.15 68.77 137.75 150.15
P1 357.19 348.19 395.22 393.42 143.01 387.81 155.41 143.01
P2 119.39 114.31 61.30 60.28 199.20 118.40 137.75 199.20
P3 232.03 225.10 219.47 218.08 172.59 246.01 146.12 172.59
P4 244.55 237.41 237.04 235.61 169.63 260.19 147.04 169.63
Avg Pre. In toe 181.97 175.86 149.17 147.95 184.42 189.29 142.40 184.42
Avg Pre. In Heel 294.61 286.65 307.34 305.75 157.80 316.91 150.76 157.80
CG of varying pr. From tip of Heel 2.09 2.09 2.04 2.03 2.32 2.08 2.23 2.32
CG of varying pr. From tip of Toe 1.55 1.55 1.41 1.40 1.80 1.53 1.73 1.80
Upward Moment in Toe 8338.42 8039.91 6204.44 6144.74 9799.77 8574.05 7289.93 9799.77
Downward Moment in Toe 8751.98 8751.98 8751.98 8751.98 8751.98 8751.98 8751.98 8751.98
Net upward Moment in Toe -413.56 -712.07 -2547.54 -2607.25 1047.79 -177.93 -1462.05 1047.79
Upward Moment in Heel 17357.34 16849.18 16435.74 16326.96 10781.28 18455.69 9923.11 10781.28
Downward Moment in Heel 19169.07 19169.07 19169.07 19169.07 19169.07 19169.07 19169.07 19169.07
Net Upward Moment in Heel -1811.73 -2319.89 -2733.33 -2842.11 -8387.79 -713.38 -9245.96 -8387.79
d effective (m)= 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89
Upward Shear in Toe= 2470.99 2388.00 2025.59 2008.99 2504.21 2570.46 1933.67 2504.21
Downward Shear in Toe= 2133.44 2133.44 2133.44 2133.44 2133.44 2133.44 2133.44 2133.44
Net upward Shear in Toe= 337.55 254.57 -107.85 -124.44 370.77 437.03 -199.77 370.77
Upward Shear in Heel= 6490.10 6314.56 6770.48 6735.37 3476.21 6981.30 3321.13 3476.21
Downward Shear in Heel= 7625.82 7625.82 7625.82 7625.82 7625.82 7625.82 7625.82 7625.82
Net Upward Shear in Heel= -1135.72 -1311.26 -855.34 -890.45 -4149.61 -644.52 -4304.69 -4149.61
Punching Shear at 2d 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79
Punching Shear = 842.48 831.19 821.64 819.39 530.12 825.64 530.12 530.12
Net Punch. Sh = 842.48 831.19 821.64 819.39 530.12 825.64 530.12 530.12
For Transverse Direction
P1 357.19 348.19 395.22 393.42 143.01 387.81 155.41 143.01
P3 232.03 225.10 219.47 218.08 172.59 246.01 146.12 172.59
P2 119.39 114.31 61.30 60.28 199.20 118.40 137.75 199.20
P4 244.55 237.41 237.04 235.61 169.63 260.19 147.04 169.63
Avg Pre. In toe 181.97 286.65 307.34 305.75 157.80 316.91 150.76 157.80
Avg Pre. In Heel 294.61 286.65 307.34 305.75 157.80 316.91 150.76 157.80
CG of varying pr. In toe 4.71 4.72 5.05 5.06 4.11 4.75 4.27 4.11
CG of varying pr. In Heel 4.52 4.53 4.63 4.63 4.09 4.54 4.27 4.09
Moment in Toe 68792.09 108561.19 124707.11 124180.47 52089.52 120903.54 51688.32 52089.52
Moment in Heel 106996.82 104177.57 114173.05 113609.20 51848.26 115499.82 51657.49 51848.26
d effective (m)= 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89
Shear at face of column= 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Net Shear = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Longitudinal Transverse
Toe Heel Toe Heel
Design Moment = 1047.79 -9245.96 124707.11 115499.82
Design Shear = 437.03 -644.52 0.00 0.00
Design Punching shear= 842.48 kN

Check for effective width for long dirn

C+3d = 1.50 + 5.68 = 7.18 > 0.00 OK
Check for effective width for trans dirn
C+3d = 8.45 + 5.68 = 14.13 > 1.89 OK

Perimeter for Punching Shear

Perimeter = 5.29 X 4.00 = 21.1 mX 1.89 = 40.03 sqm
Punching shear stress = 0.00 / 40.03 = 0.00 kN/sqm
= 0.00 Mpa OK

Confidential 7/10/2021 Page 43

A-1_19.36m Foundation Design Summary

13.5 for Quasi-permanent Combination

For longitudnal direction
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case 6 Case 7 Case 8

Case III- Case IV- Case V- Case VI- Case VII- Case VIII-
Case-II- Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent Permanent
Case- I-
Permanent Load+ 20% Load+ 20% Load+ 20% Load+ 20% load load
Permanent
load(Service) LL(Leading) LL(Leading) LL(Accom) LL(Accom) (Constructio (Construction)
load(Service)
+LL +LL +LL +LL +LL n)+Variable +Variable
+LL
(Accompanyi Surcharge Surcharge Surcharge Surcharge load load
(Leading)+W
ng)+Wind (Accom) (Accom) (Accom) (Accom) (Constructio (Construction)
ind Load
Load +Seismic_Lo +Seismic_Tr +Seismic_Lo +Seismic_Tr n)+Seismic_L +Seismic_Tran
(Accom)
(Leading) ng (During ans (During ng (During ans (During ong(Constru s(Constructio
service) service) service) service) ction) n)

P 18144.33 18168.78 18144.33 18149.22 18144.33 18144.33 11766.73 11766.73

ML 12266.52 12514.67 12266.52 12316.15 12266.52 12266.52 10949.25 10949.25
MT 0.00 992.60 0.00 198.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
P/A (a) 226.03 226.33 226.03 226.09 226.03 226.03 146.58 146.58
ML/ZL (b) 108.50 110.70 108.50 108.94 108.50 108.50 96.85 96.85
MT/ZT © 0.00 7.81 0.00 1.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
a+b+c 334.53 344.84 334.53 336.59 334.53 334.53 243.43 243.43
a-b+c 117.53 123.44 117.53 118.71 117.53 117.53 49.73 49.73
a+b-c 334.53 329.22 334.53 333.47 334.53 334.53 243.43 243.43
a-b-c 117.53 107.83 117.53 115.59 117.53 117.53 49.73 49.73
P1 334.53 344.84 334.53 336.59 334.53 334.53 243.43 243.43
P2 117.53 123.44 117.53 118.71 117.53 117.53 49.73 49.73
P3 220.32 228.32 220.32 221.92 220.32 220.32 141.48 141.48
P4 231.74 239.97 231.74 233.38 231.74 231.74 151.68 151.68
Avg Pre. In toe 174.63 181.71 174.63 176.05 174.63 174.63 100.70 100.70
Avg Pre. In Heel 277.42 286.58 277.42 279.25 277.42 277.42 192.46 192.46
CG of varying pr. From tip of Heel 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.05 2.05
CG of varying pr. From tip of Toe 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.45 1.45
Upward Moment in Toe 8053.08 8399.29 8053.08 8122.32 8053.08 8053.08 4332.66 4332.66
Downward Moment in Toe 8751.98 8751.98 8751.98 8751.98 8751.98 8751.98 8751.98 8751.98
Net upward Moment in Toe -698.90 -352.69 -698.90 -629.66 -698.90 -698.90 -4419.32 -4419.32
Upward Moment in Heel 16448.47 17031.71 16448.47 16565.16 16448.47 16448.47 10645.96 10645.96
Downward Moment in Heel 19169.07 19169.07 19169.07 19169.07 19169.07 19169.07 19169.07 19169.07
Net Upward Moment in Heel -2720.60 -2137.36 -2720.60 -2603.91 -2720.60 -2720.60 -8523.11 -8523.11
d effective (m)= 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89
Upward Shear in Toe= 2371 2467 2371 2391 2371 2371 1367 1367
Downward Shear in Toe= 2133.44 2133.44 2133.44 2133.44 2133.44 2133.44 2133.44 2133.44
Net upward Shear in Toe= 238 334 238 257 238 238 -766 -766
Upward Shear in Heel= 6111 6313 6111 6152 6111 6111 4240 4240
Downward Shear in Heel= 7625.82 7625.82 7625.82 7625.82 7625.82 7625.82 7625.82 7625.82
Net Upward Shear in Heel= -1514 -1313 -1514 -1474 -1514 -1514 -3386 -3386
Punching Shear at 2d 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79 3.79
Punching Shear = 817.45 818.55 817.45 817.67 817.45 817.45 530.12 530.12
Net Punch. Sh = 817.45 818.55 817.45 817.67 817.45 817.45 530.12 530.12
For Transverse Direction
P1 334.53 344.84 334.53 336.59 334.53 334.53 243.43 243.43
P3 220.32 228.32 220.32 221.92 220.32 220.32 141.48 141.48
P2 117.53 123.44 117.53 118.71 117.53 117.53 49.73 49.73
P4 231.74 239.97 231.74 233.38 231.74 231.74 151.68 151.68
Avg Pre. In toe 174.63 286.58 277.42 279.25 277.42 277.42 192.46 192.46
Avg Pre. In Heel 277.42 286.58 277.42 279.25 277.42 277.42 192.46 192.46
CG of varying pr. In toe 4.69 4.68 4.69 4.68 4.69 4.69 4.94 4.94
CG of varying pr. In Heel 4.51 4.51 4.51 4.51 4.51 4.51 4.60 4.60
Moment in Toe 65684.47 107583.90 104347.37 104994.43 104347.37 104347.37 76287.16 76287.16
Moment in Heel 100547.23 103782.45 100547.23 101194.27 100547.23 100547.23 71036.65 71036.65
d effective (m)= 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89
Shear at face of column= 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Net Shear = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Longitudinal Transverse
Toe Heel Toe Heel
Design Moment = -352.69 -8523.11 107583.90 103782.45
Design Shear = 333.98 -1312.8 0.00 0.00
Design Punching shear= 818.55 kN

Check for effective width for long dirn

C+3d = 1.50 + 5.68 = 7.18 > 0.00 OK
Check for effective width for trans dirn
C+3d = 8.45 + 5.68 = 14.13 > 1.89 OK

Perimeter for Punching Shear

Perimeter = 5.29 X 4.00 = 21.1 mX 1.89 = 40.03 sqm
Punching shear stress = 0.00 / 40.03 = 0.00 kN/sqm
= 0.00 Mpa OK

Confidential 7/10/2021 Page 44

A-1_19.36m Design of Footing_Return

14.0 Design of Foundation

ALL DISTANCES ARE IN M, STRESSES IN MPA, FORCES IN KN AND MOMENTS IN KNM
ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE CHECK FOR MOMENT, SHEAR AND TORSION AS PER IRC:112-2011

Span of girder c/c of bearing 18.750 m

Density Concrete (kn/cu.m) 25 Beam fck 25 Mpa Ec 30000 Mpa

Abutment fck 25 Mpa Ec 30000 Mpa
Sectional Properties
Load Case case 1 case 2 case 3 case 4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Section at Toe Slab Toe Slab Toe Slab Toe Slab Heel Slab Heel Slab Heel Slab Heel Slab
LC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
No. of webs 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Width of TOP beam, B (mm) 8450 8450 8450 8450 8450 8450 8450 8450
Depth of top beam, D (mm) 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000
Area of Sec I 16.900 16.900 16.900 16.900 16.900 16.900 16.900 16.900
Moment of Inertia (I) m4 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633
C.G. of Sec from top 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Area of Girder m2 16.90 16.900 16.900 16.900 16.900 16.900 16.900 16.900
Perimeter of Girder m 20.90 20.900 20.900 20.900 20.900 20.900 20.900 20.900
Moment of Inertia m4 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633
depth of section m 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000 2.000
CG of Section (bot) m 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Z bot of section m4 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633
Z top of section m4 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633
Width of Web m 8.450 8.450 8.450 8.450 8.450 8.450 8.450 8.450
Grade of concrete =M 25 MPa
Grade of steel = Fe500
(fck) = 25.00
(fywk) = 500.00 (fywk)/γ 434.78261 N/mm2
Ten. strength of conc (fctm) = 2.20 N/mm2 Table-6.5, p-38,IRC-112
Design yld of shear reinf fywd = 0.8*fyk/γs = 347.83 N/mm2 Clause-[Link] P-91
[Link]. factor for conc (γm) = 1.50 MPa Clause-[Link] P-49
Part. mat factor for Steel (γs) = 1.15 MPa Clause-6.2.2 P-30
Ult. comp strain in the conc (єcu3) = 0.0035 Basic Table-6.5, p-38,IRC-112
[Link] of reinforcing of steel (Es) = 200000 Basic Clause-6.2.2 P-29
[Link] of concrete (Ecm) = 30000 Table-6.5, p-38,IRC-112
modular ratio αe (Es/Ecm) = 6.67 N/mm2
[Link] strain in the steel (єs) = [{fywk/(γs xEs)}+0.002] = 0.0042 MPa IS 456 clause 38.1
[Link] influence of the concrete strength (a) = 0.67 (.67 for cube/0.85 cylinder) Cube Clause-[Link] P-49
Factor (λ) = 0.80 page-242
0.8 Up to fck ≤ 60Mpa,Eq.A2-33 (IRC:112-2011); 0.8-((fck-60)/500) for 60<fck<110Mpa
Factor (Ƞ) = 1.00 page-242
1.0 Up to fck ≤ 60Mpa,Eq.A2-35 (IRC:112-2011); 1.0-((fck-60)/250) for 60<fck<110Mpa
.
fcd = (a*fck/γm) = 11.17 Clause-[Link] P-48
Factor Fav (λȠfcd) = 8.93
Factor b = (Ƞ/2) = 0.40

DESIGN OF BEAM
For Combination I case 1 case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Ve = Vu + Tu*1.6/b Toe Slab Toe Slab Toe Slab Toe Slab Heel Slab Heel Slab Heel Slab Heel Slab
Me = Mu + Tu/1.7*(1+D/b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Shear = KN 587.78 429.58 1450.46 437.03 22.05 -2895.45 -1622.03 -644.52
Torsion = KNm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moment = KNm 3443.59 970.31 3193.24 1047.79 4079.98 9764.62 15723.46 9245.96
Design Eq Shear = KN 587.78 429.58 1450.46 437.03 22.05 -2895.45 -1622.03 -644.52
Design Eq Moment = KNm 3443.59 970.31 3193.24 1047.79 4079.98 9764.62 15723.46 9245.96
Width of beam, B = mm 8450 8450 8450 8450 8450 8450 8450 8450
Depth of beam, D = mm 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000
No of layers = 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Dia of Main. Bar = mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
cover to reinf. = mm 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75
Dia of Transverse bar = mm 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
deff provided = 1897 1897 1897 1897 1897 1897 1897 1897
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = (d*ecu3)/(es+ecu3)'mm'
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = mm 864.98 864.98 864.98 864.98 864.98 864.98 864.98 864.98
Minimum [Link] = mm2 21970 21970 21970 21970 21970 21970 21970 21970
Minimum Reinft for crack control = As,min ss = kc k fct,eff Act
ss = 347.83
k (web) = 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65
fct,eff = max of 2.8, fctm = 2.80
Act (web) = 15.323 15.323 15.323 15.323 15.323 15.323 15.323 15.323
kc (web) = 0.4*(1-sc/(k1.(h/h*).fctef)= 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
As,min = 32071 32071 32071 32071 32071 32071 32071 32071
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
A-1_19.36m Design of Footing_Return

Nos Nos 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reinf provided = mm2 32398 32398 32398 32398 32398 32398 32398 32398
Xu in mm = mm 186.6 186.6 186.6 186.6 186.6 186.6 186.6 186.6
IS Xu is less then the limiting Xulim Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Bar Spacing 126 126 126 126 126 126 126 126
Ultimate moment of resistance= KNm 25662.6 25662.6 25662.6 25662.6 25662.6 25662.6 25662.6 25662.6
Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Check for Ultimate Shear Strength at Various Xn. (Vide Cl:10.3 of I.R.C:-112-2011)
MEd
VRd,c Design shear resistance of member without shear reinforcement
VRd,max Design maximum shear force that can be sustained by the member by crushing of compression struts
VRd,s Design shear force that can be sustained by yeilding of reinforcement
Vccd Design value of shear component of force in compression area in case of inclined compression chord
Vtd Design value of shear component of force in tensile reinforcement in case of inclined tensile chord
VRd Design shear resistance of member with shear reinforcement
VRd VRd.s + Vccd + Vtd
VEd Design shear force at C/s due to external applied loads + prestressing
VNs Net shear force in web at design section
VNs VEd -Vccd -Vtd -VPd (-ve for downward; +ve is upwards)
.
. case 1 case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Toe Slab Toe Slab Toe Slab Toe Slab Heel Slab Heel Slab Heel Slab Heel Slab
VEd 587.78 429.58 1450.46 437.03 22.05 -2895.45 -1622.03 -644.52
VPd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
VNs 587.78 429.58 1450.46 437.03 22.05 -2895.45 -1622.03 -644.52
fck 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
fyk 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00
K 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33
d m 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89 1.89
bw m 8.45 8.45 8.45 8.45 8.45 8.45 8.45 8.45
bwc m 8.45 8.45 8.45 8.45 8.45 8.45 8.45 8.45
Asl mm2 32398 32398 32398 32398 32398 32398 32398 32398
Asc mm2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
S = (Ay)c m3 16.900 16.900 16.900 16.900 16.900 16.900 16.900 16.900
I m4 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633 5.633
Ϭcp MPA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
fywd MPA 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78
fcd MPA 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17
acw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
v 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552
v1 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600
ρ1 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
Ɵ deg 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0
For Elements not requiring shear reinforcement as per Cl. 10.3.2
VRd,c [0.12*K(80*ρ1*fck)^0.33 + 0.15Ϭcp] bw d
VRd,c kN 4052.5 4052.5 4052.5 4052.5 4052.5 4052.5 4052.5 4052.5
VRd,c (min) kN 3781.7 3781.7 3781.7 3781.7 3781.7 3781.7 3781.7 3781.7
VRd,c kN 4053 4053 4053 4053 4053 4053 4053 4053
VEd, < 49265 49265 49265 49265 49265 49265 49265 49265
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
VEd, actual kN 588 430 1450 437 22 -2895 -1622 -645
Shear Reinforcement is Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd
. Nominal Shear reinforcement reqd for Foundn
VRd,s Asw*z*fywd*cotƟ / s Eq 10.7 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max acw*bw*z*v1*fcd/(cotƟ+tanƟ) Eq 10.8 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max kN 44338 44338 44338 44338 44338 44338 44338 44338
ρmin = . 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072
Asw min = mm2 1533 1533 1533 1533 1533 1533 1533 1533
Asw max = 0.5*acw*v1*fcd*bw*s/(fywd)
Asw max = mm2 16407 16407 16407 16407 16407 16407 16407 16407
Asw required = mm2 200 146 493 149 8 -985 -552 -219
s = spacing of stirrups mm 252 252 252 252 252 252 252 252
diameter of stirrup mm 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
No. of legs for stirrups Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
No. of links for stirrups Nos 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33
Asw provided mm2 2592 2592 2592 2592 2592 2592 2592 2592
Shear reinft provided Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
VRd,s kN 7618 7618 7618 7618 7618 7618 7618 7618
OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY
Check for additional Longitudinal Steel for shear
ΔFtd 0.5 xVEd (cot (q) -cot (a)) a is angle of stirrups
ΔFtd 293.9 214.8 725.2 218.5 11.0 -1447.7 -811.0 -322.3
(Med - MR)/ z = 13017.6 14466.6 13164.2 14421.2 12644.7 9314.2 5823.1 9618.1
A-1_19.36m Design of Footing_Return

Additional Steel reqd = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

14.1 Minimum Distribution Steel at Bottom

Minimum Steel Requirement = 6480 mm2
Provide 16 mm Dia @ 126 mm
Provided Steel = 13484 OK
14.2 Check for Maximum Reinforcement (As per Clause [Link] )
Area of tensile steel As = 32397.67 mm2 OK
Area of compression steel As' = 13483.92 mm2
0.025Ac= 422500 mm2
0.04Ac= 676000 mm2
Total provided Steel in tension and compression = 45882 mm2 OK
14.3 Check for Minimum Reinforcement (As per Clause [Link] )
2
1. As,min = 0.26fctm/fyk btd = 22233.64 mm
2
2. As,min =0.0013 btd = 21970.00 mm
2
Ast required max of case 1 & 2 = 22233.64 mm OK

14.4 Longitudinal Steel at Top

Minimum Steel Requirement = 6480 mm2
Provide 16 mm Dia @ 126.0 mm
Provided Steel = 13484 OK
14.5 Minimum Distribution Steel at Top = 250.0 mm2/m
(as per Cl. 707.2.8 of IRC:78-2014)
Provide 12 mm Dia @ 452.4 mm
Hence Provide 16 mm Dia @ 126 mm c/c OK
A-1_19.36m CW-FDN

15.0 Crack Width Check for foundation raft

Concrete Grade fck = 25

Concrete Modulus Ec = 30000 N/mm2
Steel Modulus Es = 200 KN/mm2
Service Stage Moment = -352.69 KNm/m
Allowable crackwidth wadm = 0.3 mm
Section depth d = 2000 mm
Section width bt = 8450 mm
Minimum cover cmin = 75 mm
Bar spacing s = 126 mm
Bar diameter f = 25 mm
Effective depth h = 1912.5 mm
Area of steel As = 32398 mm2
Area of compressive steel As' = 13270.1 mm2
M under Serviceability Limit State(SLS)= -352.69 KNm/m

Check for Cracking

Depth to neutral axis,y = 1000 mm

4
Second Moment of Inertia, I = 5.63333E+12 mm
If the section is uncracked, compressive and tensile stress at the top and bottom of the section respectivley
would be σtop =σbottom = M*y/I = -0.06 Mpa
From Table 6.5, fctm corresponding to M 25 = 2.20 Mpa
Therefore the section is uncracked.
A-1_19.36m Ncase Shaft Design

16.0 COMPUTATION OF MOMENT AND SHEAR FOR DESIGN OF SHAFT:

16.1 Vertical Loads and Moments

S. No. Item Volume g P eL ML eT MT eToe Mtoe

(m3) (kN/m3) (kN) (m) (kNm) (m) (kNm) (m) (kNm)
1 Dead Load Reaction 1056.83 0.075 79.26 0.000 0.00 -4.675 -4940.68
2 SIDL Reaction (except w.c.) 279.13 0.075 20.93 0.000 0.00 -4.675 -1304.92
2 SIDL Reaction (due to w.c.) 112.68 0.075 8.45 0.000 0.00 -4.675 -526.79
3 FPLL Reaction 0.00 0.075 0.00 0.000 0.00 -4.675 0.00
3 CWLL Reaction 1149.85 0.075 86.24 905.58 -4.675 -5375.55
4 SIDL over Returns 0.00 KN/m 4.80 0.00 -2.650 0.00 0.000 0.00 -7.400 0.00
Dead Load of Sub Structure
5 Dirt Wall 5.346 25.00 133.66 -0.400 -53.46 0.000 0.00 -5.150 -688.35
6 Abutment Cap (rectangular part) 4.563 25.00 114.08 0.350 39.93 0.000 0.00 -4.400 -501.93
7 Abutment Cap (Trapezoidal part) 4.183 25.00 104.57 0.350 36.60 0.000 0.00 -4.400 -460.11
8 Abutment Shaft upto Bed Level 4.652 25.00 116.30 0.500 58.15 0.000 0.00 -4.250 -494.25
9 Abutment Shaft below Bed Level 82.388 25.00 2059.69 0.500 1029.84 0.000 0.00 -4.250 -8753.67
10 Cantilever Return Wall 0.000 25.00 0.00 -2.050 0.00 0.000 0.00 -6.800 0.00
Backfill Component
11 From bottom of shaft upto bed level(10) 247.163 19.00 4696.09 -2.500 -11740.22 0.000 0.00 -7.250 -34046.63
12 From bed level upto bottom of cap(11) 13.955 19.00 265.15 -2.500 -662.87 0.000 0.00 -7.250 -1922.33
13 From bottom of cap to bottom of dirt wall(12) 11.408 19.00 216.74 -2.500 -541.86 0.000 0.00 -7.250 -1571.38
14 From bottom of dirt wall upto top(13) 80.195 19.00 1523.70 -2.200 -3352.14 0.000 0.00 -6.950 -10589.71
Frontfill Component
15 GL to bottom of Shaft 192.238 19.00 3652.51 3.000 10957.54 0.000 0.00 -1.750 -6391.90
16 Above toe slab 16.266 19.00 309.06 3.583 1107.46 0.000 0.00 -1.167 -360.57

Totals 15790.03 -2926.15 905.58 -77928.78

16.2 Horizontal Forces and Moments @ RL 91.221 m

S. No. Item Length Height Unit Weight Pressure Horizontal Eccentricity Moment Height Pressure Horizontal Eccentricity Moment Moment
p in Force @ Base of @ Base of p in Force @ Base of @ Base of about toe,
longitudal HL abutment abutment transverse HT return wall return wall ML
direction eL ML direction eT MT
(m) (m) (KN/m3) (KN/m2) (KN) (m) (KNm) (m) (KN/m^2) (KN) (m) (KNm)
(kNm)
1 Longitudinal Force at Bearing Level 137.61 9.70 1334.99 0.00 9.70 0.00 1334.99
2 Centrifugal Force above deck level 0.00 12.88 0.00 0.00 12.88 0.00 0.00
3 Live Load Surcharge Pressure 8.450 1.20 19.00 5.57 549.80 5.84 3209.72 1.20 5.57 0.00 6.29 0.00 3209.72
4 Active Earth Pressure 8.450 11.68 19.00 54.22 2674.77 4.90 13116.86 11.68 54.22 0.00 9.95 0.00 13116.86
5 Minimum Fluid Pressure 8.450 11.68 4.80 56.04 2764.75 3.89 10760.41 11.68 56.04 0.00 4.79 0.00 10760.41
6 Governing Pressure 2764.75 13116.86 0.00 0.00 13116.86
Totals 3452.16 17661.58 0.00 0.00 17661.58

16.3 Summary of loads and Moment @ base of abutment shaft for design of abutment shaft as per Table B.2 and Table B.3 of IRC:6-2017
A-1_19.36m Ncase Shaft Design

Load Cases Load HL HT Long Mom Tran Mom Partial Factor Partial Factor Partial Factor Partial Factor
of Safety for of Safety for of Safety for of Safety for
Basic Accidental seismic SLS(Quasi
Combination Combination combination Permanent
Combination
)

Permanent Load during service

Dead Load of S.S 1056.83 79.26 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
SIDL (Except w.c.) 279.13 20.93 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
SIDL (only for w.c.) 112.68 8.45 0.00 1.75 1.00 1.75 1.20
Dead Load form Sub-Str & Found 2528.29 1111.05 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
Backfill wieght 6701.68 -16297.09 0.00 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frontfill 3961.57 12065.00 0.00 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.00
Earthpressure due to backfill (Leading) 0.00 3314.55 16326.59 0.00 1.50 0.00 1.00 1.00
Permanent Load (During construction)
Dead Load of S.S 105.68 0.00 0.00 7.93 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
SIDL (Except w.c.) 27.91 0.00 0.00 2.09 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
SIDL (only for w.c.) 11.27 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.00 1.75 1.00 1.75 1.20
Dead Load form Sub-Str & Found 252.83 0.00 0.00 111.11 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
Backfill wieght 6701.68 0.00 0.00 -16297.09 0.00 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frontfill 3961.57 0.00 0.00 12065.00 0.00 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.00
Earthpressure due to backfill (Accom) 0.00 3314.55 16326.59 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Variable Load (Leading)
Max LL (Leading) 770.84 0.00 0.00 235.11 905.58 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00
FPLL (Leading) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) 0.00 137.61 0.00 1334.99 0.00 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) for Long Seis 0.00 37.61 0.00 364.89 0.00 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) for Trans Seis 0.00 57.61 0.00 558.91 0.00 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00
Centrifugal Force (Leading) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00
Wind force (Leading) 48.91 43.60 174.40 496.30 1985.20 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
Variable Load (Accompanying)
Max LL (Accompanying) 770.84 0.00 0.00 235.11 905.58 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00
FPLL ((Accompanying)) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00
Erection Effect 154.17 0.00 0.00 47.02 181.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Horizontal Force (Accompanying) 0.00 137.61 0.00 1334.99 0.00 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) for Long Seis 0.00 37.61 0.00 364.89 0.00 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) for Trans Seis 0.00 57.61 0.00 558.91 0.00 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00
Centrifugal Force (Accomanying) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00
Wind force (Accompanying) 48.91 43.60 174.40 496.30 1985.20 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.00
Live Load Surcharge as accompanying 866.97 549.80 0.00 3209.72 0.00 1.20 0.20 0.20 0.00
A-1_19.36m Ncase Shaft Design

Variable Load (During construction)

Max LL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.00 0.00
FPLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.00 0.00
Horizontal Force 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.00 0.00
Centrifugal Force 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.00 0.00
Seismic Force (During Service)
Seismic Longitudinal 0.00 840.74 0.00 6375.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00
Seismic Transverse 0.00 637.38 902.73 4402.39 6235.11 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00
Seismic Force (During Construction)
Seismic Longitudinal 0.00 840.74 0.00 6375.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00
Seismic Transverse 0.00 637.38 902.73 4402.39 6235.11 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00

16.4 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for Basic Combination
Long Mom Tran Mom
Load Cases Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN) (KNM) (KNm)

Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL 22609.07 5243.65 261.60 22891.32 4336.16

(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom)

Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL 22368.62 5195.48 261.60 22341.78 4019.21

(Accompanying)+Wind Load (Leading)
Case III- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading)
+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long 22680.41 5688.00 0.00 24261.26 271.67
(During service)

Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading)

+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans 22680.41 5718.00 0.00 24552.29 271.67
(During service)
Case V- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During 22626.46 5674.84 0.00 24117.09 208.28
service)
Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom)
+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans 22626.46 5697.84 0.00 24340.22 208.28
(During service)

Case VII- Permanent load 16536.27 3314.55 0.00 10143.45 0.00

(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction)

Case VIII- Permanent load 16536.27 3314.55 0.00 10143.45 0.00

(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction)
A-1_19.36m Ncase Shaft Design

16.5 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for Accidental Combination
Long Mom Tran Mom
Load Cases Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN) (KNM) (KNm)

Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL 15218.30 103.21 0.00 -1834.81 679.18

(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom)
Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL
14794.34 27.52 0.00 -2698.37 181.12
(Accompanying)+Wind Load (Leading)

Case III- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading)

+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long 14929.20 138.17 0.00 -2061.51 135.84
(During service)

Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading)

+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans 14929.20 153.17 0.00 -1915.99 135.84
(During service)
Case V- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During 14844.40 117.48 0.00 -2288.06 36.22
service)
Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom)
+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans 14844.40 121.48 0.00 -2249.25 36.22
(During service)
Case VII- Permanent load
(Construction)+Variable load 11060.94 3314.55 0.00 12216.47 0.00
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction)
Case VIII- Permanent load
(Construction)+Variable load 11060.94 3314.55 0.00 12216.47 0.00
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction)

16.6 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for Seismic Condition
Long Mom Tran Mom
Load Cases Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN) (KNM) (KNm)

Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL 16077.18 3314.55 0.00 13744.48 0.00

(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom)
Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL 16231.34 3342.07 0.00 14058.49 181.12
(Accompanying)+Wind Load (Leading)

Case III- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading)

+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long 16250.57 4685.61 0.00 23949.10 0.00
(During service)

Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading)

+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans 16250.57 4380.58 1354.09 20990.00 9352.67
(During service)
A-1_19.36m Ncase Shaft Design

Case V- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During 16281.40 4693.14 0.00 24031.49 36.22
service)

Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom)

16281.40 4392.11 1354.09 21111.19 9388.89
+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans
(During service)

Case VII- Permanent load 11204.64 4575.65 0.00 21822.18 0.00

(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction)

Case VIII- Permanent load 11204.64 4270.62 1354.09 18863.08 9352.67

(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction)

16.7 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for Frequent Condition SLS Case
Long Mom Tran Mom
Load Cases Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN) (KNM) (KNm)

Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL 14662.71 3314.55 0.00 13315.89 0.00

(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom)
Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL
14662.71 3314.55 0.00 13315.89 0.00
(Accompanying)+Wind Load (Leading)

Case III- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading)

14662.71 3314.55 0.00 13315.89 0.00
+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long
(During service)

Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading)

+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans 14662.71 3314.55 0.00 13315.89 0.00
(During service)

Case V- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During 14662.71 3314.55 0.00 13315.89 0.00
service)

Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom)

+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans 14662.71 3314.55 0.00 13315.89 0.00
(During service)

Case VII- Permanent load 11063.20 3314.55 0.00 12216.64 0.00

(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction)

Case VIII- Permanent load 11063.20 3314.55 0.00 12216.64 0.00

(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction)
A-1_19.36m Shaft using 8.3.2

17.0 DESIGN OF RECTANGULAR SHAFT

Fck 25 Mpa Column Size z y

fy 500 Mpa 8450 x 1500
Area of steel = 0.77 % > 0.12 % OK (Ref Clause 16.3.1 of IRC:112-2011)
Distance between 2 adjacent vertical bar (z-dir)= 125 mm< 200 mm (Ref Clause 16.3.1 of IRC:112-2011)
Distance between 2 adjacent vertical bar (y-dir)= 127 mm< 200 mm (Ref Clause 16.3.1 of IRC:112-2011)
no. of steel on earth face of longer side = 67 Nos dia 32 area= 53884.60
no. of steel on opposite face of longer side = 67 Nos dia 25 area= 32888.55 15210 OK
no. of steel on each face ofshorter side = 11 Nos dia 25 area= 10799.22
for Circular section Total= 97572.37
α= 2
for Rectangular section
NEd/NRd= 0.10 0.70 1.00
α= 1.0 1.5 2.0
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = (d*ecu3)/(es+ecu3)'mm'
Ult. comp strain in the conc (єcu3) = 0.0035
[Link] strain in the steel (єs) = [{fywk/(γs xEs)}+0.002] = 0.004173913
Mur,lim = Fc Zlim
Zlim = (d-β2 xlim) Izz= 2.37656E+12 mm4 ry= 2439.3049 le= 8927.1
Fc = β1 fcd b xlim Iyy= 7.54189E+13 mm4 rz= 433.0127
β1 = 0.80
β2 = 0.40
fcd = αfck/Ƴm
fyd = fyk/Ƴs
λy= 3.660
λz= 20.616
λlim= 20.A.B.C/sqrt(n) Eq. 11.1 of IRC:112-2011
n= NEd/([Link]) for basic and seismic combination
Basic & Seismic Combination Accidental Combination
Es= 30000 30000
fcd = 11.167 13.958
fyd = 434.783 500.000
Ned 22680.415 15218.305
My= 24552.292 12216.469
Mz= 9388.891 679.183
n 0.160 0.086
λlim= 26.930 36.756 NO NEED TO COMPUTE 2ND ORDER MOMENT
A-1_19.36m Shaft using 8.3.2

Taking A= 0.70
B= 1.10
C= 0.70
Computation of Ultimate Moment of Resistance
1. Basic & Seismic Combination [Link] Combination
Long Dir Trans Dir Long Dir Trans Dir
Es= 200000.00 200000.00 200000.00 200000.00
d= 1375.00 8318.0 mm 1375.00 8318.00 mm
Xlim= 627.12 3793.76 mm 627.12 3793.76 mm
Zlim= 1124.15 6800.50 1124.15 6800.50
NRd= 178403.87 178403.87 KN 142593.75 142593.75 KN
NEd/NRd= 0.127 0.085 0.107 0.107
α= 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d'= 66.00 62.50 66.00 62.50
spacing= 124.63 127.27 mm 124.63 127.27 mm
Xu= 422.76 222.21 mm 273.27 177.52 mm
ϵyd= 0.002174 0.002174 0.002500 0.002500
ϵcu3= 0.00350 0.00350 0.00350 0.00350
b= 8450.00 1500.00 mm 8450.00 1500.00 mm
β1fcdbxu = 31912.4524 2977.669958 KN 25785.23213 2973.496235 KN
sum of fs As= -9128.72 19806.07 KN -10498.02 12313.71 KN
NRd (assumed)= 22783.74 22783.74 KN 15287.21 15287.21 KN
NEd (assumed)-NEd= 103.32 103.32 KN 68.90 68.90 KN
β1fcdbxu(h/2-0.42xu) = 16273.51 12106.22 KNm 14767.90 12145.07 KNm
sum(fsAs(h/2-d)= 26376.12 80434.69 KNm 30332.54 50774.40 KNm
Mrdy= 42649.64 92540.92 KNm 45100.44 62919.47 KNm
My/Mrdy= 0.580 0.103 0.68 0.275 0.013 0.29
OK OK
A-1_19.36m Shaft using 8.3.2

Total Horzt. Reinforcement = max of 24393.09251 mm2 and (Ref Clause 16.3.2 of IRC:112-2011)
12675 mm2
Min Dia of Horizontal Reinf = max of 8 mm
Ht of Pier Shaft= 6867 mm
Hence, provide 16 mm dia -no. 121
spacing= 57 say 120 mm
Binder and Ties
spacing shall not exceed the least of following 1) least lateral dimension of column
(Ref Clause 16.2.3 of IRC:112-2011) 2) twelve times the dia. of smallest lonitudnal bar
3) 200 mm

dia. of bar shall not be less than following 1) one-fourth the dia. of largest longitudnal bar
2) 8mm
so provide 10 mm dia bar @ 125 mm horizontally and 120 mm vertically
A-1_19.36m CW-Shaft

18.0 Crack Width Check for shaft

Concrete Grade fck = 25

Concrete Modulus Ec = 30000 N/mm2
Steel Modulus Es = 200 KN/mm2
Service Stage Moment = 13315.89 KNm
Allowable crackwidth wadm = 0.3 mm
Section depth d = 8318 mm
Section width bt = 8450 mm
Minimum cover cmin = 50 mm
Bar spacing s = 125 mm
Bar diameter f = 32 mm
Effective depth h = 8252 mm
Area of steel As = 53884.60 mm2
Area of compressive steel As'
As' = 32888.55 mm2
M under Serviceability Limit State(SLS)= 13315.89 KNm

18.1 Check for Reinforcement (As per Clause [Link] )

Total Vertical Steel in tension and compression = 97572 mm2
Minimum area of Steel 0.0024Ac = 30420 mm2 OK
Maximum area of Steel 0.04Ac = 507000 mm2 OK

18.2 Check for Cracking

Depth to neutral axis,y = 4159 mm

4
Second Moment of Inertia, I = 4.05E+14 mm
If the section is uncracked, compressive and tensile stress at the top and bottom of the section respectivley
would be σtop =σbottom = M*y/I = 0.14 Mpa
From Table 6.5, fctm corresponding to M 25 = 2.20 Mpa
Therefore the section is uncracked
19.0 Design of Solid Return wall

0.000 m 4.500 m Unit wt of concrete= 25 KN/m3

A B
Wt. of Solid Return (One side)=
0.31 area of cantilever return= 0.00
area of solid return= 45.6
0.300 Volume= 22.78
Wt. of Return Wall (One side)= 569.59 KN
x dx Wt. of Cant-Return Wall (One side)= 0.00 KN
10.126 m Moment due to DL of cantilever
(Avg) 0.00 KNm/m
Moment due to SIDL over cantilever
0.00 KNm/m

Y direction

X direction B'
A'

Width of Solid Return a = 4.500 m Width of Cantilever Return = 0.000 m

Height of solid return near shaft face = 9.576 m Height of Cantilever Return at tip = 0.300 m
Height of solid return at farther end = 10.676 m Height of Cantilever Return (Taper section) = 0.000 m
Avg. Heigth of Solid Return b = 10.126 m Total ht. of Cantilever Return at support = 0.300 m
Thickness of Cantilever Return wall = 0.306 m

Grade of Concrete = M 25 Clear cover to steel = 75 mm

[Link] Active Earth Pressure 'Ka' = 0.244 Unit weight of soil = 19 kN/m^3

Thickness of Solid Return at farther end = 0.300 m Thickness of Solid Return at bottom = 0.500 m
Thickness of Solid Return at Root = 0.500 m Thickness of Solid Return at top = 0.300 m

For design of return wall Load case 11.a & 11.d and their formulae given by Roark have been used.
19.1 For uniformally distributed load over entire plate From Table 11.a

Here, a/b = 0.444 For a/b = 0.375 β1 = 0.353 β1 = 0.398

For a/b = 0.500 β2 = 0.631 β2 = 0.632

For, a/b = 0.444 β1 = 0.507

β2 = 0.528
Live load surcharge :
 2
q = 0.244 x 19 x 1.200 = 5.573 kN/m

Max. sb = β1 x q x b2
2
t1
2
sa = β2 x q x b
2
t2

sb = 0.507 x 5.573 x 102.536 = 1159.56 kN/m2

0.250 = 1.160 MPa

3
For 1000 mm of width , Z = 1000 x 250000 = 4.17E+07 mm
6
Moment /m width along Y direction:
My /m width = 1.160 x 4.2E+07 = 4.83E+07 Nmm/m
= 48.315 kN.m/m

sa = 0.528 x 5.573 x 102.536 = 1206.577

0.250 = 1.207 MPa

3
For 1000 mm of height , Z = 1000 x 250000 = 4.2E+07 mm
6
 Moment /m height along X direction:
Mx /m height = 1.207 x 4.2E+07 = 5.03E+07 Nmm/m
= 50.274 kN.m/m
19.2 For triangular loading due to Earth Pressure 'Refer Load case No. 11 d From Table 11.a

a/b = 0.444 For a/b = 0.375 β1 = 0.212 β1 = 0.148

For a/b = 0.500 β2 = 0.328 β2 = 0.200

For, a/b = 0.444 β1 = 0.276

β2 = 0.177

2
q = 0.244 x 19 x 10.126 = 47.023 kN/m

Max. sb = β1 x q x b2
t12
sa = β2 x q x b2
t22
2
sb = 0.276 x 47.023 x 102.536 = 5330.762 kN/m
0.250 = 5.331 MPa

3
For 1000 mm of width , Z = 1000 x 250000 = 4.17E+07 mm
6
Moment /m width along Y direction:

My /m width = 5.331 x 4.17E+07 = 2.22E+08 Nmm/m

= 222.115 kN.m/m

sa = 0.177 x 47.023 x 102.536 = 3411.153

0.250 = 3.411 MPa

3
For 1000 mm of height , Z = 1000 x 250000 = 4.17E+07 mm
6
Moment /m height along X direction:

Mx /m height = 3.411 x 4.2E+07 = 1.42E+08 Nmm/m

= 142.131 kN.m/m
19.3 DESIGN OF SOLID RETURN

19.3.1 Moment due to Cantilever Return

 Moment due to earth pressure at face B - B'

= 0 x 1 x 19 x 0 x 0 x 5 +
+ 1 x 0 x 19 x 0 x 0 x 0 x 5
2
+ 1 x 0 x 19 x 0 x X x dx ( 5 -X )
+ 0 x 19 x 2 x 0 x X x dx ( 5 -X )

= 0 + 0 + 0 x 0 + 0 x 0
= 0 + 0 + 0
= 0 kN.m

Moment in Solid Return /m height = 50 + 142 + 0 / 11 = 192 kN.m / m

(including Cantilever moment)
Moment in Solid Return /m width = 48 + 222 = 270 kN.m / m

19.3.2 Design for Face A'B'

Moment in Solid Return /m width = 270.43 kN.m / m

19.4 Moment due to Cantilever Return

Moment due to earth pressure at face A - A'

= 0 x 1 x 19 x 0 x 0 x 0 +
+ 1 x 0 x 19 x 0 x 0 x 0 x 0
2
+ 1 x 0 x 19 x 0 x X x dx ( 0 -X )
+ 0 x 19 x 2 x 0 x X x dx ( 0 -X )

= 0 + 0 + 0 x 0 + 0 x 0
= 0 + 0 + 0
= 0 kN.m

Cantilever Moment at A-A = 0 kN.m

This return will also bend in a vertical plane due to its self wt.

Mx = 0.5 X ( 0.3 + 0.300 ) x 0.000 x 0.31 x 25 x 0.00

Mx = 0.5 X ( 0.606 ) x 0.000 = 0.000 kN.m

19.5 Summary of loads and Moment @ base of sol-ret-wall as per Table B.2 & Table B.3 of IRC:6-2017
 Partial Factor of Safety for

Partial Factor of Safety for

Partial Factor of Safety for

Partial Factor of Safety for

Longitudinal Moment for
Long Mom for Horizontal

Accidental Combination

SLS(Quasi Permanent
seismic combination
Basic Combination
Vertical Plane

Combination)
Plane
Load Cases Load
Permanent Load
Dead load of sol-ret-wall(Per m ) 126.58 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
SIDL (Per m) 5.00 11.25 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
EP &LL surcharge (Per m) 25.08 192.41 270.43 1.50 0.00 1.00 1.00

For Horizontal Plane For Vertical Plane

Load ML MT Load ML MT
For Basic Combination 215.241 303.796 0.000 For Basic Combination 215.241 303.796 0.000
For Accidental Combination 131.575 203.655 0.000 For Accidental Combination 131.575 203.655 0.000
For Seismic Combination 202.703 207.593 0.000 For Seismic Combination 202.703 207.593 0.000
For SLS Combination 156.651 204.655 0.000 For SLS Combination 156.651 204.655 0.000

19.6 Summary of loads and Moment @ base of cantilever-ret-wall as per Table B.2 & Table B.3 of IRC:6-2017

Long Mom for Horizontal

for SLS(Quasi Permanent

for seismic combination
Partial Factor of Safety

Partial Factor of Safety

Partial Factor of Safety

Partial Factor of Safety

Longitudinal Moment

for Basic Combination

for Vertical Plane

for Accidental

Combination)
Combination
Plane
Load Cases Load
Permanent Load
Dead load of cant-ret-wall(Per m ) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
SIDL (Per m) 5.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
LL Surchrge & EP (Per m) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 1.00 1.00

For Horizontal Plane For Vertical Plane

Load ML MT Load ML MT
For Basic Combination 6.750 0.000 0.000 For Basic Combination 6.750 0.000 0.000
For Accidental Combination 5.000 0.000 0.000 For Accidental Combination 5.000 0.000 0.000
For Seismic Combination 6.750 0.000 0.000 For Seismic Combination 6.750 0.000 0.000
For SLS Combination 5.000 1.000 0.000 For SLS Combination 5.000 1.000 0.000
A-1_19.36m Design of Return

20.0 Design of Return Wall

ALL DISTANCES ARE IN M, STRESSES IN MPA, FORCES IN KN AND MOMENTS IN KNM
ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE CHECK FOR MOMENT, SHEAR AND TORSION AS PER IRC:112-2011

Density Concrete (kn/cu.m) 25 Beam fck 25 Mpa Ec 30000 Mpa

Abutment fck 25 Mpa Ec 30000 Mpa
Sectional Properties
Solid Return Cantilever Return
Vertical Horizontal Vertical Horizontal
Section at Plane Plane Plane Plane
LC 1 2 3 4
No. of webs 1 1 1 1
Width of TOP beam, B (mm) 1000 1000 1000 1000
Depth of top beam, D (mm) 500 500 500 500
Area of Sec 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500
Moment of Inertia (I) m4 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010
C.G. of Sec I from top 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250
Perimeter of Girder m 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Moment of Inertia m4 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010
depth of section m 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500
CG of Section (bot) m 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250
Z bot of section m4 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.042
Z top of section m4 0.042 0.042 0.042 0.042
Width of Web m 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000

Grade of concrete =M 25 MPa

Grade of steel = Fe 500
(fck) = 25.00
(fywk) = 500.00 (fywk)/γ 434.78261 N/mm2
Ten. strength of conc (fctm) = 2.20 N/mm2 Table-6.5, p-38,IRC-112
Design yld of shear reinf fywd = 0.8*fyk/γs = 347.83 N/mm2 Clause-[Link] P-91
[Link]. factor for conc (γm) = 1.50 MPa Clause-[Link] P-49
Part. mat factor for Steel (γs) = 1.15 MPa Clause-6.2.2 P-30
Ult. comp strain in the conc (єcu3) = 0.0035 Basic Table-6.5, p-38,IRC-112
[Link] of reinforcing of steel (Es) = 200000 Basic Clause-6.2.2 P-29
[Link] of concrete (Ecm) = 30000 Table-6.5, p-
modular ratio αe (Es/Ecm) = 6.67 N/mm2 38,IRC-112
[Link] strain in the steel (єs) = [{fywk/(γs xEs)}+0.002] = 0.0042 MPa IS 456 clause 38.1
[Link] influence of the concrete strength (a) = 0.67 (.67 for cube/0.85 cylinder) Cube
Factor (λ) = 0.80 page-242
0.8 Up to fck ≤ 60Mpa,Eq.A2-33 (IRC:112-2011); 0.8-((fck-60)/500) for 60<fck<110Mpa
Factor (Ƞ) = 1.00 page-242
1.0 Up to fck ≤ 60Mpa,Eq.A2-35 (IRC:112-2011); 1.0-((fck-60)/250) for 60<fck<110Mpa
.
fcd = (a*fck/γm) = 11.17 Clause-[Link] P-48
Factor Fav (λȠfcd) = 8.93
Factor b = (Ƞ/2) = 0.40

DESIGN OF RETURN WALL

For Combination I Solid Return Cantilever Return
Vertical Horizontal Vertical Horizontal
Ve = Vu + Tu*1.6/b Plane Plane Plane Plane
Me = Mu + Tu/1.7*(1+D/b) 1 2 1 2
Shear = KN 215.24 215.24 6.75 6.75
Torsion = KNm 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Moment = KNm 0.00 303.80 0.00 0.00
Design Eq Shear = KN 215.24 215.24 6.75 6.75
Design Eq Moment = KNm 0.00 303.80 0.00 0.00
Width of beam, B = mm 1000 1000 1000 1000
Depth of beam, D = mm 500 500 500 500
No of layers = 1 1 1 1
Dia of Main. Bar = mm 20 20 20 20
cover to reinf. = mm 50 50 50 50
Dia of Transverse bar = mm 16 16 16 16
deff provided = 424 424 424 424
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = (d*ecu3)/(es+ecu3)'mm'
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = mm 193.38 193.38 193.38 193.38
A-1_19.36m Design of Return

Minimum [Link] = mm2 650 650 650 650

Dia of bars mm 20 20 20 20
Nos Nos 9 9 9 9
Dia of bars mm 20 20 20 20
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0
Dia of bars mm 20 20 20 20
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0
Reinf provided = mm2 2827 2827 2827 2827
Xu in mm = mm 137.6 137.6 137.6 137.6
IS Xu is less then the limiting Xulim Safe Safe Safe Safe
Bar Spacing 106 106 106 106
Ultimate moment of resistance= KNm 453.56 453.56 453.56 453.56
Safe Safe Safe Safe

Check for Ultimate Shear Strength at Various Xn. (Vide Cl:10.3 of I.R.C:-112-2011)
MEd
VRd,c Design shear resistance of member without shear reinforcement

VRd,max Design maximum shear force that can be sustained by the member by crushing of compression struts
VRd,s Design shear force that can be sustained by yeilding of reinforcement

Vccd Design value of shear component of force in compression area in case of inclined compression chord

Vtd Design value of shear component of force in tensile reinforcement in case of inclined tensile chord
VRd Design shear resistance of member with shear reinforcement
VRd VRd.s + Vccd + Vtd
VEd Design shear force at C/s due to external applied loads + prestressing
VNs Net shear force in web at design section
VNs VEd -Vccd -Vtd -VPd (-ve for downward; +ve is upwards)
.
. Solid Return Cantilever Return
Vertical Horizontal Vertical Horizontal
Plane Plane Plane Plane
VEd 215.24 215.24 6.75 6.75
VPd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
VNs 215.24 215.24 6.75 6.75
fck 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
fyk 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00
K 1.63 1.63 1.63 1.63
d m 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
bw m 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
bwc m 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Asl mm2 2827 2827 2827 2827
Asc mm2 1810 1810 1810 1810
S = (Ay)c m3 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125
I m4 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010
Ϭcp MPA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
fywd MPA 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78
fcd MPA 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17
fctd = fctk/γm 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
acw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
v 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552
v1 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600
ρ1 0.0057 0.0057 0.0057 0.0057
Ɵ deg 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0
.
For Elements not requiring shear reinforcement as per Cl. 10.3.2
VRd,c [0.12*K(80*ρ1*fck)^0.33 + 0.15Ϭcp] bw d
VRd,c kN 219.7 219.7 219.7 219.7
VRd,c (min) kN 161.6 161.6 161.6 161.6
VRd,c kN 220 220 220 220
VEd, < 1540 1540 1540 1540
OK OK OK OK
VEd, actual kN 215 215 7 7
Shear Reinforcement is Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd
. Nominal Shear reinforcement reqd for cap
A-1_19.36m Design of Return

.
VRd,s Asw*z*fywd*cotƟ / s Eq 10.7
VRd,max acw*bw*z*v1*fcd/(cotƟ+tanƟ) Eq 10.8
VRd,max kN 1386 1386 1386 1386
ρmin = . 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072
Asw min = mm2 76 76 76 76
Asw max = 0.5*acw*v1*fcd*bw*s/(fywd)
Asw max = mm2 817 817 817 817
Asw required = mm2 117 117 4 4
s = spacing of stirrups mm 106 106 106 106
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10
No. of legs for stirrups Nos 0 0 0 0
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10
No. of links for stirrups Nos 9 9 9 9
Asw provided mm2 707 707 707 707
Shear reinft provided Safe Safe Safe Safe
VRd,s kN 1305 1305 1305 1305
OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY
Check for additional Longitudinal Steel for shear
ΔFtd 0.5 xVEd (cot (q) -cot (a)) a is angle of stirrups
ΔFtd 107.6 107.6 3.4 3.4
(Med - MR)/ z = 1188.6 392.5 1188.6 1188.6
Additional Steel reqd = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

DESIGN OF RETURN WALL

For accidental Combination Solid Return Cantilever Return
Vertical Horizontal Vertical Horizontal
Ve = Vu + Tu*1.6/b Plane Plane Plane Plane
Me = Mu + Tu/1.7*(1+D/b) 1 2 3 4
Shear = KN 131.58 131.58 5.00 5.00
Torsion = KNm 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Moment = KNm 203.66 203.66 0.00 0.00
Design Eq Shear = KN 131.58 131.58 5.00 5.00
Design Eq Moment = KNm 203.66 203.66 0.00 0.00
Width of beam, B = mm 1000 1000 1000 1000
Depth of beam, D = mm 500 500 500 500
No of layers = 1 1 1 1
Dia of Main. Bar = mm 20 20 20 20
cover to reinf. = mm 50 50 50 50
Dia of Transverse bar = mm 16 16 16 16
deff provided = 424 424 424 424
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = (d*ecu3)/(es+ecu3)'mm'
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = mm 390.817 193.382 193.382 193.382
Minimum [Link] = mm2 650 650 650 650
Dia of bars mm 20 20 20 20
Nos Nos 9 9 9 9
Dia of bars mm 20 20 20 20
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0
Dia of bars mm 20 20 20 20
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0
Reinf provided = mm2 2827.433 2827.433 2827.433 2827.433
Xu in mm = mm 137.610 137.610 137.610 137.610
IS Xu is less then the limiting Xulim Safe Safe Safe Safe
Bar Spacing 106 106 106 106
Ultimate moment of resistance= KNm 453.564 453.564 453.564 453.564
Safe Safe Safe Safe

Check for Ultimate Shear Strength at Various Xn. (Vide Cl:10.3 of I.R.C:-112-2011)
MEd
VRd,c Design shear resistance of member without shear reinforcement
Design maximum shear force that can be sustained by the member by crushing of compression struts
VRd,max
VRd,s Design shear force that can be sustained by yeilding of reinforcement
Design value of shear component of force in compression area in case of inclined compression chord
Vccd
A-1_19.36m Design of Return

Design value of shear component of force in tensile reinforcement in case of inclined tensile chord
Vtd
VRd Design shear resistance of member with shear reinforcement
VRd VRd.s + Vccd + Vtd
VEd Design shear force at C/s due to external applied loads + prestressing
VNs Net shear force in web at design section
VNs VEd -Vccd -Vtd -VPd (-ve for downward; +ve is upwards)
.
. Solid Return Cantilever Return
Vertical Horizontal Vertical Horizontal
Plane Plane Plane Plane
VEd 131.575 131.575 5.000 5.000
VPd 0 0 0 0
VNs 131.575 131.575 5.000 5.000
fck 25 25 25 25
fyk 500 500 500 500
K 1.63 1.63 1.63 1.63
d m 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
bw m 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
bwc m 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Asl mm2 2827.433 2827.433 2827.433 2827.433
Asc mm2 1810 1810 1810 1810
S = (Ay)c m3 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125
I m4 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010
Ϭcp MPA 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
fywd MPA 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783
fcd MPA 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167
fctd = fctk/γm 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900
acw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
v 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552
v1 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600
ρ1 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006
Ɵ deg 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000
For Elements not requiring shear reinforcement as per Cl. 10.3.2
VRd,c [0.12*K(80*ρ1*fck)^0.33 + 0.15Ϭcp] bw d
VRd,c kN 219.681 219.681 219.681 219.681
VRd,c (min) kN 161.646 161.646 161.646 161.646
VRd,c kN 219.681 219.681 219.681 219.681
VEd, < 1539.919 1539.919 1539.919 1539.919
OK OK OK OK
VEd, actual kN 131.58 131.58 5.00 5.00
Shear Reinforcement is Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd
. Nominal Shear reinforcement reqd for cap
VRd,s Asw*z*fywd*cotƟ / s Eq 10.7
VRd,max acw*bw*z*v1*fcd/(cotƟ+tanƟ) Eq 10.8
VRd,max kN 1385.927 1385.927 1385.927 1385.927
ρmin = . 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
Asw min = mm2 76.320 76.320 76.320 76.320
Asw max = 0.5*acw*v1*fcd*bw*s/(fywd)
Asw max = mm2 816.730 816.730 816.730 816.730
Asw required = mm2 71.284 71.284 2.709 2.709
s = spacing of stirrups mm 106 106 106 106
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10
No. of legs for stirrups Nos 0 0 0 0
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10
No. of links for stirrups Nos 9 9 9 9
Asw provided mm2 706.858 706.858 706.858 706.858
Shear reinft provided Safe Safe Safe Safe
VRd,s kN 1304.702 1304.702 1304.702 1304.702
OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY
Check for additional Longitudinal Steel for shear
ΔFtd 0.5 xVEd (cot (q) -cot (a)) a is angle of stirrups
ΔFtd 65.788 65.788 2.500 2.500
(Med - MR)/ z = 654.898 654.898 1188.586 1188.586
Additional Steel reqd = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

DESIGN OF RETURN WALL

A-1_19.36m Design of Return

For Seismic combination Solid Return Cantilever Return

Vertical Horizontal Vertical Horizontal
Ve = Vu + Tu*1.6/b Plane Plane Plane Plane
Me = Mu + Tu/1.7*(1+D/b) 1 2 3 4
Shear = KN 202.70 202.70 6.75 6.75
Torsion = KNm 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Moment = KNm 207.59 207.59 0.00 0.00
Design Eq Shear = KN 202.70 202.70 6.75 6.75
Design Eq Moment = KNm 207.59 207.59 0.00 0.00
Width of beam, B = mm 1000 1000 1000 1000
Depth of beam, D = mm 500 500 500 500
No of layers = 1 1 1 1
Dia of Main. Bar = mm 20 20 20 20
cover to reinf. = mm 50 50 50 50
Dia of Transverse bar = mm 16 16 16 16
deff provided = 424 424 424 424
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = (d*ecu3)/(es+ecu3)'mm'
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = mm 390.817 193.382 193.382 193.382
Minimum [Link] = mm2 650 650 650 650
k (web) = 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65
fct,eff = max of 2.8, fctm = 2.80
Act (web) = 0.362 0.362 0.362 0.362
kc (web) = 0.4*(1-sc/(k1.(h/h*).fctef)= 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
As,min = 758.482 758.482 758.482 758.482
Dia of bars mm 20 20 20 20
Nos Nos 9 9 9 9
Dia of bars mm 20 20 20 20
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0
Dia of bars mm 20 20 20 20
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0
Reinf provided = mm2 2827.433 2827.433 2827.433 2827.433
Xu in mm = mm 137.610 137.610 137.610 137.610
IS Xu is less then the limiting Xulim Safe Safe Safe Safe
Bar Spacing 106 106 106 106
Ultimate moment of resistance= KNm 453.564 453.564 453.564 453.564
Safe Safe Safe Safe
Check for Ultimate Shear Strength at Various Xn. (Vide Cl:10.3 of I.R.C:-112-2011)
MEd
VRd,c Design shear resistance of member without shear reinforcement
Design maximum shear force that can be sustained by the member by crushing of compression struts
VRd,max
VRd,s Design shear force that can be sustained by yeilding of reinforcement
Design value of shear component of force in compression area in case of inclined compression chord
Vccd
Design value of shear component of force in tensile reinforcement in case of inclined tensile chord
Vtd
VRd Design shear resistance of member with shear reinforcement
VRd VRd.s + Vccd + Vtd
VEd Design shear force at C/s due to external applied loads + prestressing
VNs Net shear force in web at design section
VNs VEd -Vccd -Vtd -VPd (-ve for downward; +ve is upwards)
.
. Solid Return Cantilever Return
Vertical Horizontal Vertical Horizontal
Plane Plane Plane Plane
VEd 202.703 202.703 6.750 6.750
VPd 0 0 0 0
VNs 202.703 202.703 6.750 6.750
fck 25 25 25 25
fyk 500 500 500 500
K 1.63 1.63 1.63 1.63
d m 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
bw m 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
bwc m 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Asl mm2 2827.433 2827.433 2827.433 2827.433
Asc mm2 1810 1810 1810 1810
A-1_19.36m Design of Return

S = (Ay)c m3 0.125 0.125 0.125 0.125

I m4 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010
Ϭcp MPA 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
fywd MPA 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783
fcd MPA 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167
fctd = fctk/γm 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900
acw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
v 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552
v1 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600
ρ1 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006
Ɵ deg 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000
For Elements not requiring shear reinforcement as per Cl. 10.3.2
VRd,c [0.12*K(80*ρ1*fck)^0.33 + 0.15Ϭcp] bw d
VRd,c kN 219.681 219.681 219.681 219.681
VRd,c (min) kN 161.646 161.646 161.646 161.646
VRd,c kN 219.681 219.681 219.681 219.681
VEd, < 1539.919 1539.919 1539.919 1539.919
OK OK OK OK
VEd, actual kN 202.703 202.703 6.750 6.750
Shear Reinforcement is Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd
. Nominal Shear reinforcement reqd
VRd,s Asw*z*fywd*cotƟ / s Eq 10.7 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max acw*bw*z*v1*fcd/(cotƟ+tanƟ) Eq 10.8 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max kN 1385.927 1385.927 1385.927 1385.927
ρmin = . 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 Eq 10.20
Asw min = mm2 76.320 76.320 76.320 76.320
Asw max = 0.5*acw*v1*fcd*bw*s/(fywd)
Asw max = mm2 816.730 816.730 816.730 816.730
Asw required = mm2 109.820 109.820 3.657 3.657
s = spacing of stirrups mm 106 106 106 106
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10
No. of legs for stirrups Nos 0 0 0 0
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10
No. of links for stirrups Nos 9 9 9 9
Asw provided mm2 706.858 706.858 706.858 706.858
Shear reinft provided Safe Safe Safe Safe
VRd,s kN 1304.702 1304.702 1304.702 1304.702
OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY
Check for additional Longitudinal Steel for shear
ΔFtd 0.5 xVEd (cot (q) -cot (a)) a is angle of stirrups
ΔFtd 101.351 101.351 3.375 3.375
(Med - MR)/ z = 644.579 644.579 1188.586 1188.586
Additional Steel reqd = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

20.1 Minimum Distribution Steel on Earth Face Side

Minimum Steel Requirement = 1000 mm2
Provide 16 mm Dia @ 106 mm
Provided Steel = 1897 OK
20.2 Maximum Reinforcement (As per Clause [Link] )
Area of tensile steel As = 2827.43 mm2 OK
Area of compression steel As' = 1896.81 mm2
0.025Ac= 12500 mm2
0.04Ac= 20000 mm2
Total provided Steel in tension and compression = 4724 mm2 OK
20.3 Minimum Reinforcement (As per Clause [Link] )
2
1. As,min = 0.26fctm/fyk btd = 657.80 mm
2
2. As,min =0.0013 btd = 650.00 mm
2
Ast required max of case 1 & 2 = 657.80 mm OK

20.4 Longitudinal Steel on Other Face

Minimum Steel Requirement = 1000 mm2
Provide 16 mm Dia @ 106 mm
Provided Steel = 1897 OK
20.5 Minimum Distribution Steel on Other Face = 250.0 mm2/m
(as per Cl. 707.2.8 of IRC:78-2014)
Provide 16 mm Dia @ 804.2 mm
Hence Provide 16 mm Dia @ 106 mm c/c OK
A-1_19.36m Design of Return

Service stage condition for return wall= Vertical Horizontal

20.6 Plane Plane
Shear = 156.65 156.65
Torsion = 0.00 0.00
Moment = 204.66 204.66
Design Eq Shear = 156.65 156.65
Design Eq Moment = 204.66 204.66
A-1_19.36m CW-Return Wall

21.0 Crack Width Check for Return Wall

Concrete Grade fck = 25

Concrete Modulus Ec = 30000 N/mm2
Steel Modulus Es = 200 KN/mm2
Service Stage Moment = 204.66 KNm
Allowable crackwidth wadm = 0.3 mm
Section depth d = 500 mm
Section width bt = 1000 mm
Minimum cover cmin = 50 mm
Bar spacing s = 106 mm
Bar diameter f = 20 mm
Effective depth h = 440 mm
Area of tensile steel As = 2827.43 mm2
Area of compression steel As' = 1896.81 mm2
M under Serviceability Limit State(SLS)= 204.66 KN-m

21.1 Check for Cracking

Depth to neutral axis,y = 250 mm
Second Moment of Inertia, I = 1.0417E+10 mm4
If the section is uncracked, compressive and tensile stress at the top and bottom of the section respectivley
would be σtop =σbottom = M*y/I = 4.91 Mpa
From Table 6.5, fctm corresponding to M 25 = 2.20 Mpa

Therefore the section is cracked

m r Max Bm Xu Ast max dia deffective fct, eff

6.67 0.57 204.66 114.63 2827.43 20 424 2.20

Stress Level
Moment of Inertia of cracked section=
Icr = 2542488180 mm4
Stresses are calculated for Maximum bending moment
Maximum compressive stress in concrete( σcc) = Ms*xu/Icr
9.23 < 11.17 MPa Safe

Maximum tensile stress in steel ( σsc) = m*Ms(d-xu)/Icr

174.60 < 347.83 MPa Safe
21.2 Crack width
Maximum crack width
where spacing of bonded reinforcement with in the tension zone <= 5*(C+ф/2)
<= 5*(50+20/2)
<= 300 mm

Case 1: Spacing of bonded reinforcement with in the tension zone <= 5*(C+ф/2)
106 <= 300 mm

Coefficient based on bond propoerties k1 = 0.8 for deformed bars

Coefficient based on distribution of strain k2 = 0.5 for bending
.
Maximum crack spacing Sr,max= (3.4c)+(0.425k1k2ф)/ρ[Link]
= 262.39 mm

Ac,eff is the effective area of concrete in tension surrounding the reinforcement, of depth
hc,eff, where hceff is lesser of 2.5(h-d), (h-x)/3 or h/2.
hc,eff 150 mm or 128.46 mm or 250 mm
Therefore hc,eff 128.45816 mm
Ac,eff = 128458.16 mm2

ρ[Link] = As/[Link]
A-1_19.36m CW-Return Wall

= 0.037

Case2 :the spacing of bonded reinforcement

or
No bonded reinforcement with in the tension zone > 5*(C+ф/2)
Actual Spacing = 106 < 300 mm

Maximum crack spacing Sr,max = 1.3 (d-XU)

= 551050.987 mm Not Applicable

Maximum of maximum cracking

spacing Sr,max = 262.39 mm

Factor dependent on the duration of the load (kt) = 0.5

(esm-ecm) = (σsc - kt [Link]/ρ[Link] (1+ae*ρ[Link]))/Es >=0.6 σsc / Es

=
= 174.6049327 - 0.5 X 2.2 x 1.245
0.0368
200000

= 0.00069 >= 0.0005 (0.6 σsc / Es)

(esm-ecm) = 0.00069

Wk = Sr,max (esm-ecm)

= 0.18 mm < 0.3 Moderate

Safe (As per Table 12.1 of IRC-112)
22.0 Design of Dirt Wall

22.1 Design Data:

Thickness of Dirt Wall = 0.300 m

Approach Slab Thickness = 0.300 m
Depth of Superstructure = 1.875 m
Thickness of ( Bearing + Pedestal + Camber + W.C ) = 0.234 m
Height of Dirt Wall = 2.209 m

22.2 Concrete Design Parameters

Clear Cover ( c ) = 50 mm
Modular Ratio ( m ) = 10
Concrete design mix strength = 25 MPa
Unit weight of concrete = 25 KN/m3

22.3 Soil Parameters

Rankines or Coulumbs ("r" or "c")? = c

Angle of Repose of Soil, f (in degrees) f = 30.0
Cohesion, C (in t/m2) C = 0.0
Angle of Wall friction d = 20.0
Bulk Density of Soil g = 19.0
Equiv. Ht. of backfill earth for Live load surcharge heb = 1.2
Batter of Dirt wall with horizontal a = 90.0
Inclination of Backfill with horizontal b = 0.000
Active Earth pressure Coefficient Ka = 0.297
Active Earth pressure Coefficient ( Horizontal ) Kah = 0.279
Active Earth pressure Coefficient ( Vertical ) Kav = 0.102

0.3
0.3

2.209 0.9545 0.802

1.909
P1
P2

1.2 Ka g Ka g h

22.4 Slenderness of Dirt Wall

Height of Dirt Wall = 2.209 m

Effective Height of Dirt Wall = 1.2x2.209 = 2.6508 m
Thickness of Dirt Wall ( t ) = 0.3 m
Least Radious of Gyration = t/sqrt(12) = 0.087 m
Ratio of effective Height to Least Radious of Gyration = 30.609 m
Type of Column = Short Column
Stress Factor = 1.00 m
22.5 Loads & Moments

Height of Dirt Wall = h say

= 2.209 m
# Load 1
Earth Pressure developed due to surcharge of equivalent height of 1.2 mts is " P 1 " say.

Hence, P1 = 1.2 Kah g = 1.2 x 0.2794 x 19

2
= 6.37 kn / m

Vertical Load = Kav g h = 1.2 x 0.1017 x 19

= 2.32 kn / m2
Eccentricity of Load wrt Dirt Wall base is " h1 " say

Hence, h1 = 2.209 / 2 = 1.1045 m

# Load 2
Earth Pressure developed due to earth behind the Dirt Wall is " P2 " say.

Hence. P2 = Kah g h = 0.28 x 19 x 2.209

2
= 11.73 kn / m

Vertical Load = Kav g h = 0.102 x 19 x 2.209

2
= 4.27 kn / m
Eccentricity of Load wrt Dirt Wall base is " h2 " say

Hence, h2 = 0.42 x 2.209 = 0.92778 m

# Load 3
Vertical Load due to self weight of Dirt Wall is " P3 " say.

Hence. P3 = 0.3 x 2.209 x 25 = 16.57 kn/m run

Summary

Vertical Horizontal Force

Load Cases Description Loads Loads Eccentricity Moment
2
Kn/m width kn / m m kn - m
# Load 1 P1 2.32 14.07 1.1045 15.542
# Load 2 P2 4.27 12.95 0.92778 13.272
# Load 3 P3 16.57 0.00 0.000 0.000
23.15 27.02 28.81

22.6 Load and Moment due Live Load

The Live Load moment shall be maximum when the 40 T bogie Load is placed on the Dirt wall

Edge of C/Barrier 200 200

1.83 1.22

Effective Width = 5.259 m

Dirt Wall
2.209
Height

Effective Width
Calculation of Horizontal Forces at bearing Level
Total Load on Dirt Wall = 400 KN
= 76.06 KN / m width

Total Braking Force = 20 % of load on Dirt Wall

= 80 KN

Braking Force / mts width of the Dirt Wall = 80 / 5.259 KN / m width

= 15.21 KN / m width

Impact Factor = 1.23

Shear Due Live Load = 1.23 x 15.22 KN m / m width

= 18.71 KN m / m width

Moment Due Live Load = (2.209 +1.2 ) x 18.72 kn - m / m width

= 63.79 kn - m / m width
Calculation of Horizontal force at bearing Level for Long Seismic Case
Total Load on Dirt Wall = 400 KN
= 76.06 KN / m width
Total Braking Force = 0.00 KN
Braking Force / mts width of the Dirt Wall = 0 / 5.259 KN / m width

= 0.00 KN / m width
Impact Factor = 1.23

Shear Due Live Load = 1.23 x 0 KN m / m width

= 0.00 KN m / m width

Moment Due Live Load = (2.209 +1.2 ) x 0 kn - m / m width

= 0.00 kn - m / m width

Calculation of Horizontal force at bearing Level for Long Seismic Case

Total Load on Dirt Wall = 400 KN
= 76.06 KN / m width
Total Braking Force = 16 KN

Braking Force / mts width of the Dirt Wall = 16 / 5.259 KN / m width

= 3.04 KN / m width

Impact Factor = 1.23

Shear Due Live Load = 1.23 x 3.05 KN m / m width

= 3.74 KN m / m width

Moment Due Live Load = (2.209 +1.2 ) x 3.75 kn - m / m width

= 12.76 kn - m / m width
22.7 Summary of loads and Moment @ base of Dirt wall as per Table B.2 & Table B.3 of IRC:6-2017

Partial Factor of Safety for Accidental

Partial Factor of Safety for SLS(Quasi

Partial Factor of Safety for seismic
Partial Factor of Safety for Basic

Permanent Combination)
Combination

Combination

combination
Long Mom

Tran Mom
Load Cases Load HL HT
Permanent Load (during service)
Dead Load of Dirtwall 16.57 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
SIDL (only for w.c.) 0.56 0.00 0.00 1.75 1.00 1.75 1.00
Permanent Load (during construction)
Dead Load of Dirtwall 16.57 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
SIDL (only for w.c.) 0.56 0.00 0.00 1.75 1.00 1.75 1.00
Variable Load (Leading)
Max LL 93.55 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00
FPLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00
Horizontal Force(Breaking) 18.71 63.79 0.00 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00
Horizontal Force for Long Seis 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00
Horizontal Force for Trans Seis 3.74 12.76 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00
Earthpressure 4.27 0.00 13.27 1.50 0.00 1.00 1.00
Variable Load (Accompanying)
Max LL 93.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00
LL Surcharge 2.32 15.54 1.20 0.20 0.20 0.00
Horizontal Force(Breaking) 18.71 63.79 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00
Horizontal Force for Long Seis 0.00 0.00 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00
Horizontal Force for Trans Seis 3.74 12.76 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00
Earthpressure 4.27 13.27 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Variable Load (During Construction)
Max LL 93.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.00 0.00
Horizontal Force(Breaking) 0.00 18.71 0.00 63.79 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.00 0.00
Horizontal Force for Long Seis 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.00 0.00
Horizontal Force for Trans Seis 3.74 12.76 1.35 1.00 1.00 0.00
Seismic Force (During Service)
Seismic Longitudinal 0.00 10.5 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00
Seismic Transverse 14.8 0.00
Seismic Force (During Construction)
Seismic Longitudinal 0.00 10.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00
Seismic Transverse 14.8 0.00
22.8 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for Basic Combination

Long Mom Tran Mom

Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN)
Load Cases (KNM) (KNm)
Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL 170.08 28.07 0.00 115.59 0.00
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom)

Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL 137.99 21.52 0.00 105.27 0.00

(Accompanying)+Wind Load (Leading)
Case III- Permanent Load+ 20%
LL(Leading) +LL Surcharge (Accom) 55.48 0.00 0.00 22.63 0.00
+Seismic_Long (During service)
Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20%
LL(Leading) +LL Surcharge (Accom)
+Seismic_Trans (During service) 55.48 5.61 0.00 41.77 0.00
Case V- Permanent Load+ 20%
LL(Accom) +LL Surcharge (Accom) 48.50 0.00 0.00 21.30 0.00
+Seismic_Long (During service)

Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20%

LL(Accom) +LL Surcharge (Accom) 48.50 4.30 0.00 35.97 0.00
+Seismic_Trans (During service)
Case VII- Permanent load
(Construction)+Variable load 49.46 0.00 0.00 2.65 0.00
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Constructi
on)
Case VIII- Permanent load
(Construction)+Variable load 48.61 5.05 0.00 17.22 0.00
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construct
ion)
22.9 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for Accidental Combination

Long Mom Tran Mom

Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN)
Load Cases (KNM) (KNm)
Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom) 87.30 14.03 0.00 47.84 0.00

Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Accompanying)+Wind Load (Leading) 40.57 3.74 0.00 29.14 0.00

Case III- Permanent Load+ 20%

LL(Leading) +LL Surcharge (Accom) 31.63 0.00 0.00 3.11 0.00
+Seismic_Long (During service)
Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20%
LL(Leading) +LL Surcharge (Accom) 31.63 2.81 0.00 12.68 0.00
+Seismic_Trans (During service)
Case V- Permanent Load+ 20%
LL(Accom) +LL Surcharge (Accom) 22.19 0.00 0.00 5.76 0.00
+Seismic_Long (During service)
Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20%
LL(Accom) +LL Surcharge (Accom) 22.19 0.75 0.00 8.31 0.00
+Seismic_Trans (During service)
Case VII- Permanent load
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Constructi 36.69 0.00 0.00 2.65 0.00
on)
Case VIII- Permanent load
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construct 35.84 3.74 0.00 12.76 0.00
ion)
22.10 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for seismic combination

Long Mom Tran Mom

Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN)
Load Cases (KNM) (KNm)
Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom) 27.62 0.00 0.00 13.27 0.00

Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Accompanying)+Wind Load (Leading) 46.79 3.74 0.00 29.14 0.00

Case III- Permanent Load+ 20%

LL(Leading) +LL Surcharge (Accom) 24.67 15.69 0.00 5.76 0.00
+Seismic_Long (During service)
Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20%
LL(Leading) +LL Surcharge (Accom) 24.67 0.00 0.00 5.76 0.00
+Seismic_Trans (During service)

Case V- Permanent Load+ 20%

LL(Accom) +LL Surcharge (Accom) 28.41 15.69 0.00 5.76 0.00
+Seismic_Long (During service)

Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20%

LL(Accom) +LL Surcharge (Accom) 28.41 0.75 0.00 8.31 0.00
+Seismic_Trans (During service)
Case VII- Permanent load
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Constructi 42.91 15.69 0.00 2.65 0.00
on)
Case VIII- Permanent load
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construct 42.06 3.74 0.00 12.76 0.00
ion)
 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for SLS (Quasi Permanent Combination)
22.11

Long Mom Tran Mom

Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN)
Load Cases (KNM) (KNm)
Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom) 21.40 0.00 0.00 13.27 0.00

Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Accompanying)+Wind Load (Leading) 21.40 0.00 0.00 13.27 0.00

Case III- Permanent Load+ 20%

LL(Leading) +LL Surcharge (Accom) 17.98 15.69 0.00 2.65 0.00
+Seismic_Long (During service)
Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20%
LL(Leading) +LL Surcharge (Accom) 17.98 0.00 0.00 2.65 0.00
+Seismic_Trans (During service)

Case V- Permanent Load+ 20%

LL(Accom) +LL Surcharge (Accom) 17.98 0.00 0.00 2.65 0.00
+Seismic_Long (During service)

Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20%

LL(Accom) +LL Surcharge (Accom) 17.98 0.00 0.00 2.65 0.00
+Seismic_Trans (During service)

Case VII- Permanent load

(Construction)+Variable load 17.98 0.00 0.00 2.65 0.00
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Constructi
on)
Case VIII- Permanent load
(Construction)+Variable load 17.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construct
ion)
A-1_19.36m Design of Dirtwall

23.0 Design of Dirt Wall

ALL DISTANCES ARE IN M, STRESSES IN MPA, FORCES IN KN AND MOMENTS IN KNM
ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE CHECK FOR MOMENT, SHEAR AND TORSION AS PER IRC:112-2011

Density Concrete (kn/cu.m) 25 Beam fck 25 Mpa Ec 30000 Mpa

Pier fck 25 Mpa Ec 30000 Mpa
Sectional Properties
Load Case case 1 case 2 case 3 case 4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Section at Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall
LC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
No. of webs 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Width of TOP beam, B (mm) 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
Depth of top beam, D (mm) 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300
Area of Sec 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300
Moment of Inertia (I) m4 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
C.G. of Sec I from top 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150
Perimeter of Girder m 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.60
Moment of Inertia m4 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
depth of section m 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300
CG of Section (bot) m 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150 0.150
Z bot of section m4 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015
Z top of section m4 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015 0.015
Width of Web m 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Grade of concrete =M 25 MPa
Grade of steel = Fe500
(fck) = 25.00
(fywk) = 500.00 (fywk)/γ 434.78261 N/mm2
Ten. strength of conc (fctm) = 2.20 N/mm2 Table-6.5, p-38,IRC-112
Design yld of shear reinf fywd = 0.8*fyk/γs = 347.83 N/mm2 Clause-[Link] P-91
[Link]. factor for conc (γm) = 1.50 MPa Clause-[Link] P-49
Part. mat factor for Steel (γs) = 1.15 MPa Clause-6.2.2 P-30
Ult. comp strain in the conc (єcu3) = 0.0035 Basic Table-6.5, p-38,IRC-112
[Link] of reinforcing of steel (Es) = 200000 Basic Clause-6.2.2 P-29
[Link] of concrete (Ecm) = 30000 Table-6.5, p-38,IRC-112
modular ratio αe (Es/Ecm) = 6.67 N/mm2
[Link] strain in the steel (єs) = [{fywk/(γs xEs)}+0.002] = 0.0042 MPa IS 456 clause 38.1
[Link] influence of the concrete strength (a) = 0.67 (.67 for cube/0.85 cylinder) Cube Clause-[Link] P-49
Factor (λ) = 0.80 page-242
0.8 Up to fck ≤ 60Mpa,Eq.A2-33 (IRC:112-2011); 0.8-((fck-60)/500) for 60<fck<110Mpa
Factor (Ƞ) = 1.00 page-242
1.0 Up to fck ≤ 60Mpa,Eq.A2-35 (IRC:112-2011); 1.0-((fck-60)/250) for 60<fck<110Mpa
fcd = (a*fck/γm) = 11.17 Clause-[Link] P-48
Factor Fav (λȠfcd) = 8.93
Factor b = (Ƞ/2) = 0.40
A-1_19.36m Design of Dirtwall

DESIGN OF BEAM
For Combination I case 1 case 2 case 3 case 4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Ve = Vu + Tu*1.6/b Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall
Me = Mu + Tu/1.7*(1+D/b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Shear = KN 170.08 137.99 55.48 55.48 48.50 48.50 49.46 48.61
Torsion = KNm 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Moment = KNm 115.59 105.27 22.63 41.77 21.30 35.97 2.65 17.22
Design Eq Shear = KN 170.08 137.99 55.48 55.48 48.50 48.50 49.46 48.61
Design Eq Moment = KNm 115.59 105.27 22.63 41.77 21.30 35.97 2.65 17.22
Width of beam, B = mm 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
Depth of beam, D = mm 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300
No of layers = 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Dia of Main. Bar = mm 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
cover to reinf. = mm 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Dia of Transverse bar = mm 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
deff provided = 230 230 230 230 230 230 230 230
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = (d*ecu3)/(es+ecu3)'mm'
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = mm 104.90 104.90 104.90 104.90 104.90 104.90 104.90 104.90
Minimum [Link] = mm2 390 390 390 390 390 390 390 390
Dia of bars mm 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
Nos Nos 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Dia of bars mm 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dia of bars mm 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reinf provided = mm2 1810 1810 1810 1810 1810 1810 1810 1810
Xu in mm = mm 88.1 88.1 88.1 88.1 88.1 88.1 88.1 88.1
IS Xu is less then the limiting Xulim Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Bar Spacing 107 107 107 107 107 107 107 107
Ultimate moment of resistance= KNm 153.24 153.24 153.24 153.24 153.24 153.24 153.24 153.24
Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Check for Ultimate Shear Strength at Various Xn. (Vide Cl:10.3 of I.R.C:-112-2011)
MEd
VRd,c Design shear resistance of member without shear reinforcement
Design maximum shear force that can be sustained by the member by crushing of compression struts
VRd,max
VRd,s Design shear force that can be sustained by yeilding of reinforcement

Vccd Design value of shear component of force in compression area in case of inclined compression chord

Vtd Design value of shear component of force in tensile reinforcement in case of inclined tensile chord
VRd Design shear resistance of member with shear reinforcement
VRd VRd.s + Vccd + Vtd
VEd Design shear force at C/s due to external applied loads + prestressing
VNs Net shear force in web at design section
VNs VEd -Vccd -Vtd -VPd (-ve for downward; +ve is upwards)
. case 1 case 2 case 3 case 4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall
VEd 170.08 137.99 55.48 55.48 48.50 48.50 49.46 48.61
VPd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
VNs 170.08 137.99 55.48 55.48 48.50 48.50 49.46 48.61
fck 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
fyk 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00
K 1.82 1.82 1.82 1.82 1.82 1.82 1.82 1.82
d m 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
bw m 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
bwc m 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Asl mm2 1810 1810 1810 1810 1810 1810 1810 1810
Asc mm2 1018 1018 1018 1018 1018 1018 1018 1018
S = (Ay)c m3 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045
I m4 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
Ϭcp MPA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
fywd MPA 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78
fcd MPA 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17
fctd = fctk/γm 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
acw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
v 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552
v1 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600
ρ1 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060 0.0060
Ɵ deg 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0
For Elements not requiring shear reinforcement as per Cl. 10.3.2
VRd,c [0.12*K(80*ρ1*fck)^0.33 + 0.15Ϭcp] bw d
VRd,c kN 149.9 149.9 149.9 149.9 149.9 149.9 149.9 149.9
VRd,c (min) kN 113.8 113.8 113.8 113.8 113.8 113.8 113.8 113.8
VRd,c kN 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150
A-1_19.36m Design of Dirtwall

VEd, < 924 924 924 924 924 924 924 924
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
VEd, actual kN 170.08 137.99 55.48 55.48 48.50 48.50 49.46 48.61
Shear Reinforcement is Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd
. Nominal Shear reinforcement reqd for cap
VRd,s Asw*z*fywd*cotƟ / s Eq 10.7
VRd,max acw*bw*z*v1*fcd/(cotƟ+tanƟ) Eq 10.8
VRd,max kN 832 832 832 832 832 832 832 832
ρmin = . 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072
Asw min = mm2 154 154 154 154 154 154 154 154
Asw max = 0.5*acw*v1*fcd*bw*s/(fywd)
Asw max = mm2 1649 1649 1649 1649 1649 1649 1649 1649
Asw required = mm2 310 252 101 101 88 88 90 89
s = spacing of stirrups mm 214 214 214 214 214 214 214 214
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
No. of legs for stirrups Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
No. of links for stirrups Nos 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Asw provided mm2 353 353 353 353 353 353 353 353
Shear reinft provided Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
VRd,s kN 194 194 194 194 194 194 194 194
OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY
Check for additional Longitudinal Steel for shear
ΔFtd 0.5 xVEd (cot (q) -cot (a)) a is angle of stirrups
ΔFtd 85.0 69.0 27.7 27.7 24.3 24.3 24.7 24.3
(Med - MR)/ z = 181.9 231.7 631.0 538.5 637.4 566.5 727.5 657.1
Additional Steel reqd = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

DESIGN OF BEAM
For accidental Combination case 1 case 2 case 3 case 4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Ve = Vu + Tu*1.6/b Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall
Me = Mu + Tu/1.7*(1+D/b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Shear = KN 87.30 40.57 31.63 31.63 22.19 22.19 36.69 35.84
Torsion = KNm 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Moment = KNm 47.84 29.14 3.11 12.68 5.76 8.31 2.65 12.76
Design Eq Shear = KN 87.30 40.57 31.63 31.63 22.19 22.19 36.69 35.84
Design Eq Moment = KNm 47.84 29.14 3.11 12.68 5.76 8.31 2.65 12.76
Width of beam, B = mm 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
Depth of beam, D = mm 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300
No of layers = 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Dia of Main. Bar = mm 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
cover to reinf. = mm 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Dia of Transverse bar = mm 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
deff provided = 230 230 230 230 230 230 230 230
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = (d*ecu3)/(es+ecu3)'mm'
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = mm 225.26316 104.90085 104.90085 104.90085 104.90085 104.90085 104.90085 104.90085
Minimum [Link] = 0.002 mm2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dia of bars mm 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
Nos Nos 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Dia of bars mm 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dia of bars mm 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reinf provided = mm2 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574
Xu in mm = mm 88.071 88.071 88.071 88.071 88.071 88.071 88.071 88.071
IS Xu is less then the limiting Xulim Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Bar Spacing 107 107 107 107 107 107 107 107
Ultimate moment of resistance= KNm 153.23942 153.23942 153.23942 153.23942 153.23942 153.23942 153.23942 153.23942
Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Check for Ultimate Shear Strength at Various Xn. (Vide Cl:10.3 of I.R.C:-112-2011)
MEd
VRd,c Design shear resistance of member without shear reinforcement
Design maximum shear force that can be sustained by the member by crushing of compression struts
VRd,max
VRd,s Design shear force that can be sustained by yeilding of reinforcement
Design value of shear component of force in compression area in case of inclined compression chord
Vccd
Design value of shear component of force in tensile reinforcement in case of inclined tensile chord
Vtd
VRd Design shear resistance of member with shear reinforcement
VRd VRd.s + Vccd + Vtd
VEd Design shear force at C/s due to external applied loads + prestressing
VNs Net shear force in web at design section
VNs VEd -Vccd -Vtd -VPd (-ve for downward; +ve is upwards)
. case 1 case 2 case 3 case 4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
A-1_19.36m Design of Dirtwall

Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall

VEd 87.295431 40.572395 31.63 31.63 22.19 22.19 36.69 35.84
VPd 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3
VNs 87.295431 40.572395 31.62678 31.62678 22.189434 21.189434 34.694365 32.840782
fck 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
fyk 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500
K 1.82 1.82 1.82 1.82 1.82 1.82 1.82 1.82
d m 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
bw m 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
bwc m 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Asl mm2 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574
Asc mm2 1018 1018 1018 1018 1018 1018 1018 1018
S = (Ay)c m3 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045
I m4 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
Ϭcp MPA 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
fywd MPA 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783
fcd MPA 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167
fctd = fctk/γm 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900
acw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
v 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552
v1 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600
ρ1 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006
Ɵ deg 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000
For Elements not requiring shear reinforcement as per Cl. 10.3.2
VRd,c [0.12*K(80*ρ1*fck)^0.33 + 0.15Ϭcp] bw d
VRd,c kN 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467
VRd,c (min) kN 113.84261 113.84261 113.84261 113.84261 113.84261 113.84261 113.84261 113.84261
VRd,c kN 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467
VEd, < 923.95161 923.95161 923.95161 923.95161 923.95161 923.95161 923.95161 923.95161
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
VEd, actual kN 87.30 40.57 31.63 31.63 22.19 22.19 36.69 35.84
Shear Reinforcement is Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd
. Nominal Shear reinforcement reqd for cap
.
VRd,s Asw*z*fywd*cotƟ / s Eq 10.7
VRd,max acw*bw*z*v1*fcd/(cotƟ+tanƟ) Eq 10.8
VRd,max kN 831.55645 831.55645 831.55645 831.55645 831.55645 831.55645 831.55645 831.55645
ρmin = . 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072
Asw min = mm2 154.08 154.08 154.08 154.08 154.08 154.08 154.08 154.08
Asw max = 0.5*acw*v1*fcd*bw*s/(fywd)
Asw max = mm2 1648.87 1648.87 1648.87 1648.87 1648.87 1648.87 1648.87 1648.87
Asw required = mm2 159.13634 73.961973 57.654449 57.654449 40.450517 40.450517 66.892469 65.336417
s = spacing of stirrups mm 214 214 214 214 214 214 214 214
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
No. of legs for stirrups Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
No. of links for stirrups Nos 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Asw provided mm2 353.42917 353.42917 353.42917 353.42917 353.42917 353.42917 353.42917 353.42917
Shear reinft provided Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
VRd,s kN 193.87622 193.87622 193.87622 193.87622 193.87622 193.87622 193.87622 193.87622
OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY
Check for additional Longitudinal Steel for shear
ΔFtd 0.5 xVEd (cot (q) -cot (a)) a is angle of stirrups
ΔFtd 43.647715 20.286197 15.81339 15.81339 11.094717 11.094717 18.347183 17.920391
(Med - MR)/ z = 509.18179 599.52838 725.27097 679.04992 712.44807 700.12245 727.46416 678.65899
Additional Steel reqd = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
A-1_19.36m Design of Dirtwall

DESIGN OF BEAM
For Seismic combination case 1 case 2 case 3 case 4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Ve = Vu + Tu*1.6/b Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall
Me = Mu + Tu/1.7*(1+D/b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Shear = KN 27.62 46.79 24.67 24.67 28.41 28.41 42.91 42.06
Torsion = KNm 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Moment = KNm 13.27 29.14 5.76 5.76 5.76 8.31 2.65 12.76
Design Eq Shear = KN 27.62 46.79 24.67 24.67 28.41 28.41 42.91 42.06
Design Eq Moment = KNm 13.27 29.14 5.76 5.76 5.76 8.31 2.65 12.76
Width of beam, B = mm 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
Depth of beam, D = mm 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300
No of layers = 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Dia of Main. Bar = mm 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
cover to reinf. = mm 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Dia of Transverse bar = mm 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
deff provided = 230 230 230 230 230 230 230 230
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = (d*ecu3)/(es+ecu3)'mm'
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = mm 225.26316 104.90085 104.90085 104.90085 104.90085 104.90085 104.90085 104.90085
Minimum [Link] = 0.002 mm2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
k (web) = 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65
fct,eff = max of 2.8, fctm = 2.80
Act (web) = 0.212 0.212 0.212 0.212 0.212 0.212 0.212 0.212
kc (web) = 0.4*(1-sc/(k1.(h/h*).fctef)= 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
As,min = 443.56822 443.56822 443.56822 443.56822 443.56822 443.56822 443.56822 443.56822
Dia of bars mm 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
Nos Nos 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Dia of bars mm 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dia of bars mm 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reinf provided = mm2 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574
Xu in mm = mm 88.071 88.071 88.071 88.071 88.071 88.071 88.071 88.071
IS Xu is less then the limiting Xulim Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Bar Spacing 107 107 107 107 107 107 107 107
Ultimate moment of resistance= KNm 153.23942 153.23942 153.23942 153.23942 153.23942 153.23942 153.23942 153.23942
Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
A-1_19.36m Design of Dirtwall

Check for Ultimate Shear Strength at Various Xn. (Vide Cl:10.3 of I.R.C:-112-2011)
MEd
VRd,c Design shear resistance of member without shear reinforcement

VRd,max Design maximum shear force that can be sustained by the member by crushing of compression struts
VRd,s Design shear force that can be sustained by yeilding of reinforcement

Vccd Design value of shear component of force in compression area in case of inclined compression chord

Vtd Design value of shear component of force in tensile reinforcement in case of inclined tensile chord
VRd Design shear resistance of member with shear reinforcement
VRd VRd.s + Vccd + Vtd
VEd Design shear force at C/s due to external applied loads + prestressing
VNs Net shear force in web at design section
VNs VEd -Vccd -Vtd -VPd (-ve for downward; +ve is upwards)
. case 1 case 2 case 3 case 4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall Dirtwall
VEd 27.618419 46.792895 24.667778 24.667778 28.409934 28.409934 42.914865 42.061282
VPd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
VNs 27.618419 46.792895 24.667778 24.667778 28.409934 28.409934 42.914865 42.061282
fck 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
fyk 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500
K 1.82 1.82 1.82 1.82 1.82 1.82 1.82 1.82
d m 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
bw m 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
bwc m 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Asl mm2 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574 1809.5574
Asc mm2 1018 1018 1018 1018 1018 1018 1018 1018
S = (Ay)c m3 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045
I m4 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002
Ϭcp MPA 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
fywd MPA 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783
fcd MPA 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167
fctd = fctk/γm 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
acw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
v 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552
v1 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600
ρ1 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.006
Ɵ deg 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000
For Elements not requiring shear reinforcement as per Cl. 10.3.2
VRd,c [0.12*K(80*ρ1*fck)^0.33 + 0.15Ϭcp] bw d
VRd,c kN 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467
VRd,c (min) kN 113.84261 113.84261 113.84261 113.84261 113.84261 113.84261 113.84261 113.84261
VRd,c kN 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467 149.85467
VEd, < 923.95161 923.95161 923.95161 923.95161 923.95161 923.95161 923.95161 923.95161
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
VEd, actual kN 27.618419 46.792895 24.667778 24.667778 28.409934 28.409934 42.914865 42.061282
Shear Reinforcement is Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd
. Nominal Shear reinforcement reqd for cap
VRd,s Asw*z*fywd*cotƟ / s Eq 10.7 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max acw*bw*z*v1*fcd/(cotƟ+tanƟ) Eq 10.8 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max kN 831.55645 831.55645 831.55645 831.55645 831.55645 831.55645 831.55645 831.55645
ρmin = . 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 Eq 10.20
Asw min = mm2 154.08 154.08 154.08 154.08 154.08 154.08 154.08 154.08
Asw max = 0.5*acw*v1*fcd*bw*s/(fywd)
Asw max = mm2 1648.87 1648.87 1648.87 1648.87 1648.87 1648.87 1648.87 1648.87
Asw required = mm2 50.347355 85.301714 44.968446 44.968446 51.790258 51.790258 78.23221 76.676158
s = spacing of stirrups mm 214 214 214 214 214 214 214 214
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
No. of legs for stirrups Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
No. of links for stirrups Nos 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Asw provided mm2 353.42917 353.42917 353.42917 353.42917 353.42917 353.42917 353.42917 353.42917
Shear reinft provided Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
VRd,s kN 193.87622 193.87622 193.87622 193.87622 193.87622 193.87622 193.87622 193.87622
OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY
Check for additional Longitudinal Steel for shear
ΔFtd 0.5 xVEd (cot (q) -cot (a)) a is angle of stirrups
ΔFtd 13.809209 23.396447 12.333889 12.333889 14.204967 14.204967 21.457433 21.030641
(Med - MR)/ z = 676.17254 599.52838 712.44807 712.44807 712.44807 700.12245 727.46416 678.65899
Additional Steel reqd = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

23.1 Minimum Distribution Steel

Minimum Steel Requirement = 600 mm2
Provide 12 mm Dia @ 107 mm
A-1_19.36m Design of Dirtwall

Provided Steel = 1057 OK

23.2 Maximum Reinforcement (As per Clause [Link] )
Area of tensile steel As = 1809.56 mm2 OK
Area of compression steel As' = 1056.98 mm2
0.025Ac= 7500 mm2
0.04Ac= 12000 mm2
Total provided Steel in tension and compression = 2867 mm2 OK
23.3 Minimum Reinforcement (As per Clause [Link] )
2
1. As,min = 0.26fctm/fyk btd = 394.68 mm
2
2. As,min =0.0013 btd = 390.00 mm
2
Ast required max of case 1 & 2 = 394.68 mm OK

23.4 Longitudinal Steel on Other Face

Minimum Steel Requirement = 600 mm2
Provide 12 mm Dia @ 107.0 mm
Provided Steel = 1057 OK
23.5 Minimum Distribution Steel on Other Face = 250.0 mm2/m
(as per Cl. 707.2.8 of IRC:78-2014)
Provide 12 mm Dia @ 452.4 mm
Hence Provide 12 mm Dia @ 107 mm c/c OK
23.6 Service stage condition for Dirt wall=
Shear = 21.40
Torsion = 0.00
Moment = 13.27
Design Eq Shear = 21.40
Design Eq Moment = 13.27
A-1_19.36m CW-Dirtwall

24.0 Crack Width Check for Return Wall

Concrete Grade fck = 25

Concrete Modulus Ec = 30000 N/mm2
Steel Modulus Es = 200 KN/mm2
Service Stage Moment = 13.27 KNm
Allowable crackwidth wadm = 0.3 mm
Section depth d = 300 mm
Section width bt = 1000 mm
Minimum cover cmin = 50 mm
Bar spacing s = 107 mm
Bar diameter f = 16 mm
Effective depth h = 242 mm
Area of tensile steel As = 1809.56 mm2
Area of compression steel As' = 1056.98 mm2
M under Serviceability Limit State(SLS)= 13.27 KN-m

24.1 Check for Cracking

Depth to neutral axis,y = 150 mm
Second Moment of Inertia, I = 2250000000 mm4
If the section is uncracked, compressive and tensile stress at the top and bottom of the section respectivley
would be σtop =σbottom = M*y/I = 0.88 Mpa
From Table 6.5, fctm corresponding to M 25 = 2.20 Mpa

Therefore the section is uncracked

25.0 Design of Abutment Cap

Length of abutment cap (Trans direction) = 8.45 m

Length of abutment cap (Long direction) = 1.80 m

Width of Abutment shaft (Trans Direction) = 8.45 m

Width of Abutment shaft (Long Direction) = 1.50 m

Size of Pedestal = 800 x 620 x 150

Provide Grade of concrete =M 25 MPa

As per Clause 307.1 of IRC : 21 .

Allowable Bearing Pressure ɕcc = ɕco x A1

A2

2
here, A2 = 496000 mm
2
A1 = 1012000 mm

A1 2
A2
Hence, steel shall be provided in accordance with Clause no 710.8.4 of
1.43 2 IRC :78-2014.

25.1 Design of Abutment Cap in Longitudinal direction supporting dirt wall:

Total load on dirt wall = 400 KN

Dispersion width = 5.259 m
Load of CWLL /m width of dirt wall = 76.07 KN/m width

Weight of dirt wall = 18.56 KN/m

Total Load from dirt wall = 94.63 KN/m

Dist. From centre of dirt wall to face = 0.150 m

Moment at the face of cap = 14.2 KNm

Effective depth required = 121 mm

Total depth provided = 600 mm

Effective depth provided = 519 mm

Area of steel required = 125 mm^2

Provide 12 mm dia bars @ 200 mm c/c at top and bottom in long. direction. (Ast = 566 mm^2)

Provide 16 mm dia bars @ 150 mm c/c at top and bottom in trans. direction. (Ast = 1341 mm^2)

(fywk)/γ = 434.7826 N/mm2

Factor (λ) = 0.80
Factor (Ƞ) = 1.00
fcd = (a*fck/γm) = 11.17 N/mm2
b = 1000 mm
Xu = 27.54705 mm

Ult. comp strain in the conc (єcu3) = 0.0035

[Link] strain in the steel (єs) = [{fywk/(γs xEs)}+0.002] = 0.0041739
Xu Lim = 236.71105 mm OK
25.0 Design of Abutment Cap
25.2 Design of Abutment Cap in Transverse direction:

As per cl. 710.8.7 of IRC : 78- 2014, Reinforcement in Abutment caps where the bearing satisfied the square root formula stated in Clause
307.1 of IRC:121, the pier caps shall be reinforced with a total minimum of 1 percent steel, assuming a cap thickness of 225mm.

1800

300
Abut Cap
300

3
Volume of Abutment cap = 225 x 1800 x 8450 = 3.42E+09 mm
(As per cl 710.8.7 of IRC : 78 - 2014 )

3
Quantity of steel = 1.00 % of volume = 34222500 mm

3
Steel to be provided at top = 34222500 / 2 = 17111250 mm

3
Steel to be provided at bottom = 34222500 / 2 = 17111250 mm

25.3 Steel on Top Face of Abutment Cap

25.3.1 Longitudnal steel

3
Qty of steel to be provided in long dir = ( 0.5 x total steel at top ) = 8555625 mm

Clear cover = = 50 mm
Length of bar = 4400 = 4400 mm

2
Area of steel required in long dir = 8555625 / 4400 = 1945 mm
2
Ast / m width = 1945 / 8.45 = 230 mm

2
Provide 2 Leg12 mm dia bars @ 200 mm c/c in longitudinal direction at top. (Ast = 565 mm ) OK

25.3.2 Transverse steel

Qty of steel to be provided in trans dir = ( 0.5 x total steel at top ) = 8555625 mm3

Clear cover = = 50 mm
Length of bar = 8450 - 2 x 50 = 8350 mm

2
Area of steel required in trans dir = 8555625 / 8350 = 1025 mm

2
Provide 16 mm dia bars @ 150 mm c/c in transverse direction at top. (Ast = 1340 mm ) OK
2
Provide 16 mm dia bars @ 150 mm c/c in transverse direction at bottom. (Ast = 1340 mm ) OK
PIER DESIGN
Pier _P2 INPUT

DESIGN OF WALL PIER AND PIER FOUNDATION

Pier No : P-2
1.0 INPUT DATA:
Design Levels for Pier No. of lanes 2
Finished Road Level FRL = 102.897 m * Marked at edge of the outer crash barrier
difference in height of pier for RHS = 0.000
Pier Cap level LHS = 100.688 m Height of Pier above G.L = 6.36 m
Pier Cap level RHS 100.688 m
Bottom of Pier Shaft = 90.840 m Depth of Foundation below G.L= 7.5 m
Founding Level FL = 89.040 m Min Ht of Ped+ brg (RHS)= 234 mm
Ground Level after cutting LWL = 89.040 m Min Ht of Ped+ brg (LHS)= 234 mm
HFL HFL = 99.258 m
Scour depth Dsm = 7.223 m (From Hydraulical calculations)
Normal Scour level for Pier = 91.040 m Rock Level= 91.040 m
Ground level BL = 96.540 m
Superstructure Data LHS SPAN RHS SPAN
Angle of skew a = 0.0 º 0.0 º
Span of the bridge = 19.360 m 19.360 m
Span c/c of Bearing = 18.75 m 18.75 m
C/C of bearing & expansion joint = 0.305 m 0.305 m
C/C distance between pedestals = 2.500 m 2.500 m
Width of carriageway = 7.50 m 7.50 m
Overall width of Superstructure = 8.450 m 8.450 m
Width of crash barrier at edge = 0.000 m 0.000 m
Width of kerb = 0.475 m 0.475 m
Width of footpath = 0.00 m 0.000 m
Width of Post = 0.00 m 0.000 m
Width of Arch = 0.00 m 0.000 m
Live load considered on FP = 0.00 Kg/m2 0.00 Kg/m2
skew width of the superstructure = 8.45 m 8.45 m
Overall Depth of superstructure = 1.875 m 1.875 m
Thickness of wearing course = 0.100 m 0.100 m
Seismic Restrainer
Height = 0.500 m 0.500 m
width = 0.500 m 0.500 m
Length = 0.500 m 0.500 m

Constants
Density of concrete = 25.00 KN/m3
Weight of wearing coat = 25.00 KN/m2
Grade of Concrete (substructure) = M 25 MPa.

Data for pier design Providing wall Type Sub Structure

Overall Heigth of Pier Shaft = 9848 mm (Pier cap top to top of found)
Slope of pier face = 1 in 500000
thickness of Pier = 1300 mm
length of Pier in the Long Dirn. = 1300 mm
length of Pier in the Trans Dirn. = 4500 mm
Pier Cap Length in Trans Dirn. = 7700 mm
Pier Cap Width in Long Dirn. At Top = 2100 mm
Straight Depth of Pier Cap (Rectangular) = 750 mm Taking minimum ht of pedestal at end brg location as
Varying Depth of Pier Cap (Trapeziodal) = 750 mm 150 mm
Size of bearing (LHS assumed ) = 500 x 300 x 84 x 3 Nos
Size of bearing (RHS assumed ) = 500 x 300 x 84 x 3 Nos
Min Size of Pedestals = LHS 800 x 600 x 150 x 3 Nos
Min Size of Pedestals = RHS 800 x 600 x 150 x 3 Nos
thk of pier at bottom = 1300 mm
Total straight Height of Pier wall = 8348 mm
Pier _P2 INPUT

Data for foundation

Type of Foundation = Open
Depth of Foundation below GL = 7.50 m
Total Thickness of foundation = 1.80 m
Thickness of at Tip = 1.00 m
Length of Found Lx(Transverse) = 7.5 m
Width of Found Bx (Long) = 6.5 m
The Dead Load reaction has been increased by 5% for taking into account of unforseen reasons

Input for loads from superstructure LHS RHS T-ECC Transverse

Length of single span 18.75 M 18.75 M M Eccenticity
Dead Load Reaction of S.S = 1109.67 KN 1109.67 KN M
SIDL Reaction = 279.13 KN 279.13 KN M
Wearing Coat 112.68 KN 112.68 KN M
FPLL 0.0 KN 0.0 KN M
Pier _P2 LL-Max(RKN)

3.0 CALCULATION OF LIVE LOAD REACTION AND MOMENTS

3.1 Maximum Reaction Case

Parameters
Left Side Span (C/C of Exp. Gap) = 19.36 m
Right Side Span (C/C of Exp. Gap) = 19.36 m
Left Side Dist. Between Exp Gap & Bearing = 0.305 m
Right Side Dist. Between Exp Gap & Bearing = 0.305 m
Left Side Span (C/C of Bearing) = 18.750 m
Right Side Span (C/C of Bearing) = 18.750 m

To find the maximum reaction we place the train of loads in such a way that
CG of the load system is placed at the center line of the pier. Load
MAX REAC Long Left Span Right Span
R1 R2 Moment 1st Train 2nd Train 3rd Train 1st Train 2nd Train 3rd Train
TYPE 1 IL_A FRW 264.96 149.40 35.2 282 0.00 0.00 272 0.00 0.00
TYPE 2 1L_70RFRW 394.39 450.31 17.1 490 0.00 0.00 510 0.00 0.00
TYPE 3 IL_A REV 152.61 261.64 33.3 272 0.00 0.00 282 0.00 0.00
TYPE 4 1L_70R REV 450.86 393.86 17.4 510 0.00 0.00 490 0.00 0.00
Note: The above value has been obtained using STAAD Pro Software.

Breaking force
LHS RHS

56.40 54.40
98.00 102.00
54.40 56.40
102.00 98.00
Span
Ht of Breaking Force from brg level for LHS = 3.175 m 18.75 m
Ht of Breaking Force from brg level for RHS = 3.175 m 18.75 m
Change in Verttical Inc in Long
Breaking Force
Reaction Moment
LHS RHS LHS RHS
TYPE 1 IL_A FRW 56.40 54.40 9.55 9.21 5.72
TYPE 2 1L_70RFRW 98.00 102.00 16.59 17.27 10.33
TYPE 3 IL_A REV 54.40 56.40 9.21 9.55 5.72
TYPE 4 1L_70R REV 102.00 98.00 17.27 16.59 10.33

Reduction Factor in longitudnal effect = 1.0

Summary of Loads @ maximum live load case (Excluding Impact factor):

Vertical Load Long Moment Vertical Load (Kn) Breaking Force (Kn)
Details of Load Cases
kn knm L-Span R-Span L-Span R-Span
Case 1 : 1L+CLA FORW 433.12 41.0 291.6 281.2 56.40 54.40
Case 2 : 1L_70R_FORW 878.57 27.4 506.6 527.3 98.00 102.00
Case 3 : 1L_CLA REV 433.01 39.0 281.2 291.6 54.40 56.40
Case 4 : 1L_70R REV 878.59 27.7 527.3 506.6 102.00 98.00
Case 5 : Cl A_2 Lane FORW 866.24 81.9 583.1 562.4 112.80 108.80
Case 6 : Cl A_2 Lane REV 866.02 78.0 562.4 583.1 108.80 112.80
Case 7 : Cl A_2 Lane (Cl A forw + Cl A Rev) 866.13 79.9 572.8 572.8 110.80 110.80
Pier _P2 LL-Max(L-MOM)

3.2 Maximum Longitudinal moment Case

# Parameters ( Loading on RHS Span)

Right Side Span (C/C of Exp. Gap) = 19.36 m

Left Side Span (C/C of Exp. Gap) = 19.36 m
Left Side Dist. Between Exp Gap & Bearing = 0.305 m
Right Side Dist. Between Exp Gap & Bearing = 0.305 m
Right Side Span (C/C of Bearing) = 18.75 m
Left Side Span (C/C of Bearing) = 18.75 m

The line sketch for the spans and the pier is shown below.

19.36 19.36

A B C D

18.750 0.305 0.305 18.750

From STAAD OUTPUT

Load
MAX REAC Long Left Span Right Span
R1 R2 Moment 1st Train 2nd Train 3rd Train 1st Train 2nd Train 3rd Train
TYPE 1 IL_A FRW 0.00 340.58 103.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 554 0.00 0.00
TYPE 2 1L_70RFRW 0.00 804.67 245.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 1000 0.00 0.00
TYPE 3 IL_A REV 0.00 390.38 119.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 500 0.00 0.00
TYPE 4 1L_70R REV 0.00 741.34 226.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 920 0.00 0.00

Breaking force
LHS RHS

0.00 110.80
0.00 200.00
0.00 100.00
0.00 184.00
# Change in vertical load due to breaking:
Span
Ht of Breaking Force from brg level for LHS = 3.175 m 18.75 m
Ht of Breaking Force from brg level for RHS = 3.175 m 18.75 m
Change in Verttical Inc in Long
Breaking Force
Reaction Moment
LHS RHS LHS RHS
TYPE 1 IL_A FRW 0.00 110.80 0.00 -18.76 -5.72
TYPE 2 1L_70RFRW 0.00 200.00 0.00 -33.87 -10.33
TYPE 3 IL_A REV 0.00 100.00 0.00 -16.93 -5.16
TYPE 4 1L_70R REV 0.00 184.00 0.00 -31.16 -9.50

Reduction Factor in longitudnal effect = 1.0

Summary of Loads for Maximum longitudinal Moment case (excluding impact factor):
Ver Load L- Mom Load on Span Braking force
Details of Load Cases
Kn Knm L-Span R-Span L-Span R-Span
Case 1 : 1L+CLA FORW 451.38 98.15 0.00 535.24 0.00 110.80
Case 2 : 1L_70R_FORW 1004.67 235.10 0.00 966.13 0.00 200.00
Case 3 : 1L_CLA REV 490.38 113.90 0.00 483.07 0.00 100.00
Case 4 : 1L_70R REV 925.34 216.61 0.00 888.84 0.00 184.00
Case 5 : Cl A_2 Lane FORW 902.76 196.30 0.00 1070.48 0.00 221.60
Case 6 : Cl A_2 Lane REV 980.76 227.80 0.00 966.13 0.00 200.00
Case 7 : Cl A_2 Lane (Cl A forw + Cl A Rev) 941.76 212.05 0.00 1018.30 0.00 210.80
Pier _P2 LL-(T-MOM)

3.3 Maximum Transverse moment case

LHS
475 475
CL of Bridge

3750

8450

Carriageway configuration of 2-lane bridge

RHS
475 475
CL of Bridge

3750

8450

Carriageway configuration of 2-lane bridge

a) Class 70 R ( Wheeled ): 1Lane

Vehicle on LHS

475 475
CL of Bridge

1155

2595

8450

Vehicle on RHS

475 475

1155

2595

8450

b) Class A ( 1 Lane )

Vehicle on LHS

475 475
CL of Bridge

2450
Pier _P2 LL-(T-MOM)

1300

8450

Vehicle on RHS

475 475

2450

1300

8450
b) Class A ( 2 Lane )

Vehicle on LHS

475 475
CL of Bridge

700

3050

8450
Vehicle on RHS
475 475

700

3050

8450

Eccentricity from
Eccentricity from center
center line of
Sr. No. Class of Loading line of carriageway LHS
carriageway RHS
(m)
(m)

1 Class 70R ( 1- Lane ) 1.155 1.155

2 Class A ( 1- Lane ) 2.450 2.450
3 Class A ( 2- Lane ) 0.700 0.700

Hence maximum Transverse moment is as follows:

Eccentricity from center Total Reaction on Transverse

Sr. No. line of carriageway Pier Moment
(m) (kn) (kn-m)
Pier _P2 LL-(T-MOM)

Case 1 : 1L+CLA FORW 2.450 433.12 1061.15

Case 2 : 1L_70R_FORW 1.155 878.57 1014.74
Case 3 : 1L_CLA REV 2.450 433.01 1060.88
Case 4 : 1L_70R REV 1.155 878.59 1014.77
Case 5 : Cl A_2 Lane FORW 0.700 866.24 606.37
Case 6 : Cl A_2 Lane REV 0.700 866.02 606.22
Case 7 : Cl A_2 Lane (Cl A forw + Cl A Rev) 0.700 866.13 606.29
Pier _P2 Summary _L.L

3.4 Summary of Load & Moments due to live load (with Impact Factor)
Impact Factor = 1.18 for class A 1.18 for class 70 R
Congestion Factor = 1.00
I :Maxm Reaction Case:
Vertical Load Long Moment Trans Moment Vertical load (Kn) Braking Force (Kn)
Details of Load Cases
kn kn - m kn - m L-Span R-Span L-Span R-Span
Case 1 : 1L+CLA FORW 509.98 40.97 1061.15 343.28 331.11 56.40 54.40
Case 2 : 1L_70R_FORW 1036.71 27.38 1014.74 597.78 622.18 98.00 102.00
Case 3 : 1L_CLA REV 509.85 38.98 1060.88 331.11 343.28 54.40 56.40
Case 4 : 1L_70R REV 1036.73 27.71 1014.77 622.18 597.78 102.00 98.00
Case 5 : Cl A_2 Lane FORW 1019.95 81.94 606.37 686.57 662.22 112.80 108.80
Case 6 : Cl A_2 Lane REV 1019.70 77.95 606.22 662.22 686.57 108.80 112.80
Case 7 : Cl A_2 Lane (Cl A forw + Cl A Rev) 1019.83 79.94 606.29 674.40 674.40 110.80 110.80

II: Maxm Long Moment Case:

Vertical Load Long Moment Trans Moment Vertical load (Kn) Braking Force (Kn)
Details of Load Cases
kn kn - m kn - m L-Span R-Span L-Span R-Span
Case 1 : 1L+CLA FORW 531.48 98.15 1061.15 0.00 630.21 0.00 110.80
Case 2 : 1L_70R_FORW 1185.51 235.10 1014.74 0.00 1140.04 0.00 200.00
Case 3 : 1L_CLA REV 577.40 113.90 1060.88 0.00 568.78 0.00 100.00
Case 4 : 1L_70R REV 1091.90 216.61 1014.77 0.00 1048.83 0.00 184.00
Case 5 : Cl A_2 Lane FORW 1062.95 196.30 606.37 0.00 1260.43 0.00 221.60
Case 6 : Cl A_2 Lane REV 1154.79 227.80 606.22 0.00 1137.57 0.00 200.00
Case 7 : Cl A_2 Lane (Cl A forw + Cl A Rev) 1108.87 212.05 606.29 0.00 1199.00 0.00 210.80

Summary of Loads
Vertical Load Long Moment Trans Moment Vertical load (Kn) Braking Force (Kn)
Details of Load Cases
kn kn - m kn - m L-Span R-Span L-Span R-Span
Case 1: Max Rkn case 1036.73 81.94 1061.15 686.57 686.57 112.80 112.80
Case 2: Max Long Moment case 1185.51 235.10 1061.15 0.00 1260.43 0.00 221.60
Pier _P2 Wind_load

4.0 Wind Loads (As per Clause 209 of IRC:6-2014)

Parameters
Left Side Span (C/C of Exp. Gap) = 19.36 m
Right Side Span (C/C of Exp. Gap) = 19.36 m
Left Side Dist. Between Exp Gap & Bearing = 0.305 m
Right Side Dist. Between Exp Gap & Bearing = 0.305 m
Left Side Span (C/C of Bearing) = 18.75 m
Right Side Span (C/C of Bearing) = 18.75 m
Depth of Superstructure ( Left side) = 1.875 m
Depth of Superstructure ( Right side) = 1.875 m
Height of Post = 0.000 m
Height of Kerb+Carsh Barrier = 0.900 m
Finished Road Level = 102.897 m
The horizontal wind pressure is calculated as per Cl: 209 of IRC : 6 - 2017

from the "Table of Wind Pressure & Wind Velocities ".

H= The average height in meter of the exposed surface above the

mean retarding surface, ( Ground Level, Bed Level, or
water level)
Vz = Horizontal velocity of wind in m /s at height H
Pz = Horizontal wind pressure in N / m2 at height H

H = Formation Level - Mean Retarding Surface

Mean Retardig Surface is the lowest of the following:

a) Ground Level = 96.540 m

Hence H = 6.357 m

We find out the wind pressure from the table given below.
Value as per Table 12 of IRC:6-2017 for Basic wind
speed of 33m/s
H (m) Vz (m/s) Pz (N/m2)
10.00 27.80 463.70
15.00 29.20 512.50
6.357 27.80 463.70

From Fig. 10 of IRC:6-2017;

Basic wind speed = 47 m/s

Therefore the design horizontal wind pressure is : 940.6 N / m2

Or, Wind Pressure on loaded structure = 940.60 N / m2

Pier _P2 Wind_load

4.1) Wind Loads on Structure (Both Span loaded condition)

Wind Load as per Clause 209.3 of IRC:6-2017

a) Wind load on Superstructure

Exposed deck area 0.5* ( 19.36 x 2.775 + 19.36 x 2.775) = 53.724 sqm
Gust Factor, G (for Highway bridges upto span of 150m)= 2.0
for deck supported by 2 or more plate girder
c d
2.5 1.875 Here, CD = 2.47
F T = P z x A1 x G x C D
Horizntal Wind Load on deck (Transv.) = 249.6KN acting @ RL 103.35 m
Horizntal Wind Load on deck (Long.) = 62.4KN acting @ RL 103.35 m

Upward or downward Vertical Wind Load

F v = Pz x A3 x G x CL
A3= 140.6 G= 2.0
C L= 0.75 P z= 463.7 N/mm2
Fv= = 97.8KN acting @ RL 102.90 m

Wind load on Live Load:

Wind Speed 39.59 m/s > 36 m/s Do not consider Wind Load on LL
For this case, CD = 1.2
F T = P z x A1 x G x CD where Pz x G x CD =0
acting at 1.5 m above the roadway
Frontal area of 70R vehicle A1 = 28.14 m²
Frontal area of Class A A1 = 39.48 m²
70R (W) Class -A
Wind on L. Load from Left Span: 0.00 0.00 (in t)
Wind on L. Load from Right Span: 0.00 0.00 (in t)
Total Wind on LL 0.00 0.00 (in t)
C.g of Wind on Live Load (1.5+ 102.897 ) i.e acting @ RL 104.397 m
70R (W) Class -A
Total WL on DL+LL (Transv.) 249.63 249.63 KN
C.g of Wind Load 103.347 103.347 m

WL for loaded structure(trans direction) 249.63 KN acting @ RL 103.347 m

Moment @ Pier Base 249.64x12.51 3122.15 KNm
WL for loaded structure(long direction) 62.41 KN acting @ RL 103.347 m
Moment @ Pier Base 62.41x12.51 780.54 KNm
Pier _P2 Wind_load

b) Wind Load on Substructure

Drag cofficient for substructure t= 1300 t/b= 0.29 (1/ 3.47 )

b= 4500 H/b= 1.86
H= 8348
for rectangular pier
Say, CD = 1.4 From Table 13

Exposed area of pier cap = 5.775 sqm

So, force on pier cap = 15.21 KN

Exposed area of pier wall = 21.70 sqm

So, force on pier wall = 5.72 KN

Trans Dir
load (KN) R.L. (m)
249.63 103.347
so, net moment at base of pier wall(trans) [Link]
= 3285.07 KNm 270.56
and net moment at base of pier wall (long) Resultant force
= 821.27 KNm 15.21 99.983455
pier cap wind

5.72 95.014
pier wall wind

Pier Bott 90.84

5.0 Water current force

Mean velocity of water current = 4 m/sec

Transverse dimenion of Pier = 4.5 m
Longitudinal dimension of Pier = 1.3 m
Type of cut water Circular
Possible variation in water current = 0
20

Max Velocity of water in Trans-Direction 5.656 m/s

As per Clause 210 of IRC :6 -2017

Allowing 20 0 for possible variation of current.

Maximum current effect in longitudinal direction

VL = 5.656 Sin (20)
= 1.934 m/s
2
VL = 3.742 m/s

Maximum current effect in transverse direction

VT = 5.656 Cos( 20)
= 5.315 m/s
VT 2 = 28.248 m/s
5.1 Water currentforce in Longitudinal direction :

3.742 RL 99.258 (HFL)

24.325 KN

8.22

RL 90.840 (Bottom of pier shaft)

RL 91.040 (Maximum scour level)

Velocity Profile

As per clause 210.2 of IRC:6 - 2017 pressure due to water current is given by :
2
P = 52K V
where,
P = Intensity of pressure due to water current, in Kg/m2
V = Velocity of the current at the point where the pressure intensity
is being calculated, in meter per second
K = Const. = 0.66 ( For pier with semi-circular end )
Pressure intensity at Maximum scour level level
Pb = 0 N/ sq m
Pressure intensity at HFL level
Pt = 1284.31 N/ sq m
Pressure intensity at bottom of pier shaft
= 0.00

Total force on pier = 642.15 x 8.42 x 4.50

1000 ( Height & width of pier )
= 24.325 KN
 C.G. of the force = 5.612 m

Total force on pier on found = 0.00 x 1.80 x 7.50

1000 ( Height & width of foundation )
= 0.000 KN

C.G. of the force = 0.000 m

Moment @ base of pier wall = 136.514 KNm above R.L. = 90.840

5.2 Water current effect in Transverse direction :

28.248 RL 99.258 (HFL)

53.05 KN

8.22

RL 90.840 (Bottom of pier shaft)

0
RL 91.040 (Maximum scour level)

As per clause 210.2 of IRC:6 - 2017 pressure due to water current is given by :
P = 52 K V2
where,
P = Intensity of pressure due to water current, in Kg/m2
Velocity of the current at at the point where the pressure intensity is
V = being calculated,in meter per second
K = Constant = 0.66 ( For pier with semi-circular end )

i) Pressure intensity at bottom of pier

Pb = 0 N/ sq m
Pressure intensity at HFL level
Pt = 9694.77 N/ sq m
Pressure intensity at bottom of pier shaft
= 0.00

Total force on pier = 4847.39 x 8.418 x 1.3

1000 ( Height & width of pier )
= 53.047 KN

C.G. of the force = 5.612 m

Moment @ base of pier wall = 297.70 KNm above R.L. = 90.840
5.3 Buoyant force:
Volume of Pier section submerged @ HFL cond.
= 59.92 m3
For Pier design, Reduction in weight = 0.15 x V
(considering 15% Buoyant Force) = 89.87 KN
For Design of Found, Reduction in weight = 599.16 KN
(considering 100% Buoyant Force)
Pier _P2 seismic Co-eff

6.0 Seismic Analysis of Bridges:

As per Clause 219.5.1 of IRC:6-2017

Geometry

1. Height of Pier Wall = 9.85 m

2. Thickness of Pier wall = 1.30 m
3. Width of Pier Cap = 7.70 m
4. Dead load of Superstructure = 1501.48 KN
5. Live load on Pier = 175.72 KN ( 20% Live Load considered)
6. Grade of Concrete = M 25

Design Parameters
Options
1. Design Seismic Zone = III ( II, III, IV, V)
2. Type of soil = rocky/hard Rocky / Hard / medium / Soft
3. Type of Bridge = Important Important / Other

Calculation of Seismic Co-efficient ( Ah)

Horizontal Seismic Forces: Feq =Ah x (Dead Load + Appropriate Live load)
Table-16 of IRC:6-2017
Ah : = (Z/2)*I*(Sa/g) Zone factor
(R/I) Zone No. Zone factor
V 0.36
Z : Zone factor IV 0.24
0.16 III 0.16
II 0.1
(Sa/g) : Average response acceleratiobn coefficient for 5 per cent damping
depending upon fundamental period of vibration T as given in Fig. 13
which is based on the following equation.
= f (T) function of fundamental period of vibration , Strata Sa/g Limit for "T"
<= T <=
R : Response deduction factor 2.5 1+15T 0 </= T </= 0.1
I : Importance factor 1.5 Important Rocky/ Hard 2.5 0.1 </= T </= 0.4
1.2 River Bridges soil 1.0/ T 0.4 </= T </= 4
1.0 Normal Bridges 1+15T 0 </= T </= 0.1
Medium soil 2.5 0 </= T </= 0.55
T : 2xSQRT(D/1000F) 1.36/ T 0.55 </= T </= 4

Soft 1+15T 0 </= T </= 0.1

D : Vertical Load soil 2.5 0.1 </= T </= 0.67
F : Stiffness of the Section 1.67/ T 0.67 </= T </= 4
Pier _P2 seismic Co-eff

a) For Longitudinal Seismic Co-efficient

F = 3EI 666351.6 = 697.68 Kn/mm (For unit 1 mm deflection)

L3 955.08961

T = 2*SQRT(1501.49)/(1000*697.69))
= 0.09
(Sa/g) = 2.50

(Z/2) = 0.08
(R/I) = 2.08
Ah = 0.10

b) For Transverse Seismic Co-efficient

F = 3EI 55611.56 = 58.23 KN/mm

L3 955.08961

T = 2*SQRT((1501.49+175.72)/(1000*58.23))
= 0.34
(Sa/g) = 2.95

(Z/2) = 0.08
(R/I) = 2.08
Ah = 0.11
Pier _P2 Seismic_load

7.0 Seismic Load:

Seismic load is calculated based on Cl. 222 of IRC:6-2017

Moment table for stability of Pier

Seismic condition: Taking moment at column base level (RL =) 90.840
Seismic Co-efficient 0.130 0.142
7.1 Both Span Loaded (Loads and moment calculated upto base of the pier) Vert. Coeff. = 0.00 0.00
Longitudinal Moment case:
[Link]. Description Vertical Vertical Horizontal Moment
L.A/ Ecc from toe
Load Force Force KN-M
@ base of pier
(KN) (KN) Long Trans
( A ) [Dead Load]

1 Superstructure 2219.346 0.000 288.515 10.082 2908.808

2 SIDL 225.364 0.000 29.297 10.082 295.375
Pier
3 Pedestal 11.880 0.000 1.544 9.923 15.325
4 Pier Cap (Rec) 303.188 0.000 39.414 9.473 373.372
5 Pier Cap (Trap por) 205.092 0.000 26.662 8.848 235.904
6 Pier wall (Rec portion) 1497.907 0.000 194.728 4.174 812.794
Total siesmic 0.000 580.161 4641.58

Transverse moment case:

[Link]. Description V Vertical H L.A / Moment
Force Ecc. from KN-M
(KN) (KN) (KN) c/l of colm Long Trans
(A) [Dead Load]

1 Superstructure 2219.346 0.000 315.147 11.120 3504.278

2 SIDL 225.364 0.000 32.002 12.057 385.844
Pier 0.000
3 Pedestal 11.880 0.000 1.687 9.923 16.740
4 Pier cap (rec) 303.188 0.000 43.053 9.473 407.838
5 Pier Cap (Parab por) 205.092 0.000 29.123 8.848 257.680
6 Pier wall 1497.907 0.000 212.703 4.174 887.822
(B) [Live load]
with 20 % live load 23.710 0.000 3.367 13.257 44.634
with 100% live load 118.551 0.000 16.834 13.257 223.172
Total siesmic (with
( with 20%live
100% Live load)
load) 0.000 637.081
650.548 5504.84
5683.37
Pier _P2 Creep_shrinkage

8.0 Bending Moments due to temp, creep and shrinkage on Left Span
( As per cl 215.4 of IRC:6-2017)
a) Due to temperature :
Temp. co-eff
T/oC a = 1.20E-05
o
Elongation a t l = 1.20E-05 x 40 x 18750 = 4.500 mm
2
b) Residual shrinkage + creep strain ( As per Cl 217.3 of IRC:6-2017)
Co-eff for shrinkage strain: 2.00E-04 = 2.00E-04
Elongation d = 2.00E-04 x 18750 = 1.875 mm
2
Total Elongation = 4.500 + 1.875 = 6.38 mm

Force developed for POT PTFE Bearing :

Longitudinal Force on Bearing = Gad

due to horizontal movement of superstructure. t
G - Shear modulus of elastomer = 10
A- Area of bearing provided = 30 x 50 = 1500 cm2
d - Movement of superstructure. = 0.6375 cm
t - Thk of Elastomer provided. = 8.4 cm.
= 10 x 1500 x 0.6375
8.4
= 1138.39 Kg.
Total force on Pier = 1138.39 x3 x1 = 3415.18 Kg.
(No of (No of
brgs./span) Spans)
= 34.15 KN
Moment (Long) = 344.3183 KNm
8.1 Bending Moments due to temp, creep and shrinkage on Right Span
( As per cl 215.4 of IRC:6-2017)
a) Due to temperature :
Temp. co-eff
T/oC a = 1.20E-05
Elongation a t l = 1.20E-05 x 40 o x 18750 = 4.500 mm
2
b) Residual shrinkage + creep strain ( As per Cl 217.3 of IRC:6-2017)
Co-eff for shrinkage strain: 2.00E-04 = 2.00E-04
Elongation d = 2.00E-04 x 18750 = 1.875 mm
2
Total Elongation = 4.500 + 1.875 = 6.38 mm

Force developed for POT PTFE Bearing :

Longitudinal Force on Bearing = Gad

due to horizontal movement of superstructure. t
G - Shear modulus of elastomer = 10
A- Area of bearing provided = 30 x 50 = 1500 cm2
d - Movement of superstructure. = 0.6375 cm
t - Thk of Elastomer provided. = 8.4 cm.
= 10 x 1500 x 0.6375
8.4
= 1138.39 Kg.
Total force on Pier = 1138.39 x3 x1 = 3415.18 Kg.
(No of (No of
brgs./span) Spans)
= 34.15 KN
Moment (Long) = 344.32 KNm
Pier _P2 Pier

9.0 Analysis of Pier section

Design Data for Superstructure:- LHS RHS

C/C Distance betn Bearings = 18.750 18.750 m
C/C Distance betn Piers = 19.360 19.360 m
Carriageway Width = 7.500 7.500 m
Overall Width of Deck. = 8.450 8.450 m
Overall Depth of superstructure = 1.875 1.875 m

Design Data for Pier :-

Angle of skew 0 deg 0.000 rad Cos( 0) 1.000
Overall Heigth of Pier Shaft = 8348 mm Sin (0) 0.000
thickness of Pier (at Top) = 1300 mm
thickness of Pier (at Bottom) = 1300 mm
Pier Cap Width in Trans Dirn. = 7700 mm
Pier Cap Length in Long Dirn. = 2100 mm
Pier Cap projection beyond pier in long. Dirn = 50 mm
Straight Depth of Pier Cap = 750 mm
Varying Depth of Pier Cap = 750 mm
Size of Pedestals LHS = 800 x 600 x 150 x Nos 3
Size of Pedestals RHS = 800 x 600 x 150 x Nos 3
Distance betn Pedestals (LHS) = 2500 mm
Distance betn Pedestals (RHS) = 2500 mm
Grade of Concrete = 25 N/mm2
Total Height of Pier = 8348 mm
Radius of cut water/ ease water = 0 mm
3
Density of Concrete = 25.00 KN/m
Seismic Arestor
Length of seismic restrainer = 500 mm (NA)
Width of seismic restrainer = 500 mm (NA)
Height of seismic restrainer = 500 mm (NA)
References.
I.R.C :- 6 - 2017 - Loads & Stresses.
I.R.C:-78-2014-Load Combination
I.R.C :- 21 - 2000 - Permissible Stresses LHS RHS
7700 2100
2500 2500 1050 1050

0
750
750
400 1300 400
5900
50
RCC Pier
4500
1300
A A
8348 8348

1300

4500

Section at Top
9.1 Calculation of Dead Load from Substructure :-
a) Wt of Pedestals
Volume of Pedestal (LHS) = 0.8 x 0.6 x 0.15 x3
= 0.22 m3
Volume of Pedestal (RHS) = 0.8 x 0.6 x 0.15 x3
= 0.22 m3
3
Total Volume = 0.48 m (Inc by 10% for incidental load)
Total Load = 0.48 x 25 = 11.88 KN

b) Wt of Inspection Plateform & Ladder with LL say = 50.00 KN

Pier _P2 Pier

c) Pier Wall (Straight Portion) Top Bottom

X-dimension Length = 5.52 m 5.52
Width = 1.30 m 1.30
Total Cross sectional Area at Top = 7.18
Total Cross sectional Area at Bottom = 7.18 m2
Height of Pier wall = 8.35 m
Total Volume = (A1+A2+sqrt(A1*A2))*h/3 = 59.92 m3
Total Load = 59.92 x 25 = 1497.91 KN

d) Pier cap ( Rec Portion)

2
Plan area of Pier cap (rec) = 2.1 x 7.7 = 16.17 m

Volume = 16.17 x 0.75

3
= 12.13 m
Dead Load = 12.13 x 25.00 = 303.19 KN
e) Pier Cap (trapeziodal portion):
Length Width
A1, Area in plan for base of Trapezoid 4.60 x 1.4 = 6.44 Sq m

A2, Area of Plan for top of trapezoid 7.70 x 2.1 = 16.17 Sq m

3
Volume of trapezoidal portion = 8.20 m (A1+A2+sqrt(A1*A2))*h/3
Total Volume = 8.20 m3
Total Load = 8.20 x 25.00 = 205.09 KN
f) Wt. of Seismic Restrainer

Volume of Restainer (LHS) = 0.5 x 0.50 x 0.5

= 0.125 m3
Volume of Restainer (RHS) = 0.5 x 0.50 x 0.5
= 0.125 m3
Total Volume = 0.25
Total Load = 0.25 X 25 = 6.25 KN

9.2 Calculation of Horizontal force at bearing Level (As per Clause: [Link])
LHS span RHS span
Horizontal Force at end Horizontal Force at end
F=Fh/2+VrItc F=Fh/2+VrItc
where VrItc = 0.00 (Both Spans are same)

Live Load Braking Dead Load H-force

H-Total on
Load Cases Rkn at pier, (Rq) Force, F (KN) Rkn at Pier, (Rg) at bearing
Pier
L-Span R-Span L-Span R-Span L-Span R-Span L-Span R-Span
Case 1: Max Rkn case 686.57 686.57 112.80 112.80 1501.48 1501.48 56.40 56.40 112.80
Case 2: Max Long Moment case 0.00 1260.43 0.00 221.60 1501.48 1501.48 0.00 110.80 110.80

Force acting @ 4.298

Moment due to horizontal force @ base of pier
H-Total on Long
Load Cases Pier Moment
KN KNm
Case 1: Max Rkn case 112.80 484.8
Case 2: Max Long Moment case 110.80 476.2
9.3 Calculation of Horizontal force at bearing Level for Long Seismic Case
LHS span RHS span
Horizontal Force at end Horizontal Force at end
F=Fh/2+VrItc F=Fh/2+VrItc
where VrItc = 0.00 (Both Spans are same)

Live Load Braking Dead Load H-force H-Total on

Load Cases
L-Span R-Span L-Span R-Span L-Span R-Span L-Span R-Span Pier
Case 1: Max Rkn case 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1501.48 1501.48 0.00 0.00 0.00
Case 2: Max Long Moment case 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1501.48 1501.48 0.00 0.00 0.00

Force acting @ 4.298

Moment due to horizontal force @ base of pier
H-Total on Long
Load Cases Pier Moment
KN KNm
Case 1: Max Rkn case 0.00 0.0
Case 2: Max Long Moment case 0.00 0.0
Pier _P2 Pier

9.4 Calculation of Horizontal force at bearing Level for Trans Seismic Case
LHS span RHS span
Horizontal Force at end Horizontal Force at end
F=Fh/2+VrItc F=Fh/2+VrItc
where VrItc = 0.00 (Both Spans are same)

Live Load Braking Dead Load H-force H-Total on

Load Cases
L-Span R-Span L-Span R-Span L-Span R-Span L-Span R-Span Pier
Case 1: Max Rkn case 137.31 137.31 22.56 22.56 1501.48 1501.48 11.28 11.28 22.56
Case 2: Max Long Moment case 0.00 252.09 0.00 44.32 1501.48 1501.48 0.00 22.16 22.16

Force acting @ 4.148

Moment due to horizontal force @ base of pier
H-Total on Long
Load Cases Pier Moment
KN KNm
Case 1: Max Rkn case 22.56 93.6
Case 2: Max Long Moment case 22.16 91.9

9.5 Vertical Load and Moment due to Dead load acting at pier cap level

LHS RHS L-
Ecc. Tr (LHS) Ecc. Tr (RHS) T-Moment Ecc (LHS) Ecc (RHS)
Items Span Span Moment
DL Superstructure 1109.67 1109.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.31 -0.31 0.0
W.C. 112.68 112.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.31 -0.31 0.0
Crash Barrier 0.00 0.00 3.99 3.99 0.00 -0.31 -0.31 0.0
Footpath DL 0.00 0.00 3.99 3.99 0.00 -0.31 -0.31 0.0
Footpath LL 0.00 0.00 3.99 3.99 0.00 -0.31 -0.31 0.0
Post and Railing @2KN/m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.31 -0.31 0.0
0.00
Total 1222.35 1222.35 0.00 0.00

9.6 Vertical Load and moment due to substructure

@ base of pier

Items Vert-Load Ecc. Tr T-Moment Ecc Long L-Moment

Pedestal Load + Ladder 61.88 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0
Wall pier 1497.91 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0
Pier Cap 508.28 0.00 0.00 0.000 13.1
Seismic Restrainer 6.25 1.00 6.25 1.000 0.0
Total 2074.32 0.00 13.1

9.7 Live load Reaction and Moment

Vert Load Long Mom Trans Mom

Details of Load case
KN KN-m KN-m
Case 1: Max Rkn case 1036.73 81.94 1061.15
Case 2: Max Long Moment case 1185.51 235.10 1061.15

9.8 Footpath Live load Reaction and Moment

Vert Load Long Mom Trans Mom

Details of Load case
KN KN-m KN-m
Case 1: Max Rkn case 0.00 0.00 0.00
Case 2: Max Long Moment case 0.00 0.00 0.00

9.9 Wind Load effect

Both span loaded
Design Horizontal force (Long) 67.64 KN
Design Moment at pier base (Long) 821.3 KNm
Design Horizontal force (Trans) 270.56 KN
Design Moment at pier base (Trans) 3285.07 KNm

9.10 Seismic Force

(Bridge lies in Zone III, seismic force is considered as per clause Cl 219 of IRC:6-2017)
Seismic forces at the base of pier
Both span loaded
Total Hor Force ( Long) = 580.2 KN
Total Hor Force (Trans) = 637.1 KNm
Total Long Moment = 4641.6 KN
Total Trans Moment= 5504.84 KNm
Pier _P2 Pier

9.11 Shrinkage Effect

LHS
Total Hor Force ( Long) = 34.2 KN
Total Long Moment = 344.3 KNm
RHS
Total Hor Force ( Long) = 34.2 KN
Total Long Moment = 344.32 KNm

9.12 Summary of loads and Moment @ base of Pier wall as per Table B.2 & Table B.3 of IRC:6-2017

Partial Factor of Safety for

Partial Factor of Safety for

Partial Factor of Safety for

Partial Factor of Safety for

Accidental Combination

SLS(Quasi Permanent
seismic combination
Basic Combination

Combination)
Long Mom

Tran Mom
Load Cases Load HL HT
Permanent Load during service
Dead Load of S.S 2219.35 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
SIDL (Except w.c.) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
SIDL (only for w.c.) 225.36 0.00 0.00 1.75 1.00 1.75 1.00
Dead Load form Sub-Str. 2074.32 13.13 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
Shrinkage Effect 68.30 688.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Permanent Load (During construction)
Dead Load of S.S 1109.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
SIDL (Except w.c.) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
SIDL (only for w.c.) 112.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.75 1.00 1.75 1.00
Dead Load form Sub-Str. 2074.32 0.00 0.00 13.13 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
Shrinkage Effect 34.15 344.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Variable Load (Leading)
Max LL (Leading) 1185.51 235.10 1061.15 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00
FPLL (Leading) 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) 112.80 484.81 0.00 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) for Long Seis 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) for Trans Seis 22.16 91.92 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00
Centrifugal Force (Leading) 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00
Wind force (Leading) 97.81 67.64 270.56 821.27 3285.07 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
Variable Load (Accompanying)
Max LL (Accompanying) 1185.51 0.00 0.00 235.10 1061.15 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00
FPLL ((Accompanying)) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00
Horizontal Force ((Accompanying)) 0.00 112.80 0.00 484.81 0.00 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) for Long Seis 0.00 0.00 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) for Trans Seis 22.16 91.92 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00
Centrifugal Force (Accomanying) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00
Wind force (Accompanying) 97.81 67.64 270.56 821.27 3285.07 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.00
Variable Load (During construction)
Max LL 118.55 0.00 0.00 23.51 106.11 1.35 1.00 1.00 0.00
FPLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.00 0.00
Horizontal Force 0.00 11.28 0.00 48.48 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.00 0.00
Centrifugal Force 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.00 0.00
Hydraulic Load (Accompanying)
Water current forces 3.74 28.25 136.51 297.70 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Buoyant force -89.87 0.15 0.15 1.00 0.15
Seismic Effect (During service)
Seismic Longitudinal 580.16 4641.58 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00
Seismic Transverse 637.08 5504.84 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00
Seismic Effect (During construction)
Seismic Longitudinal 0.00 580.16 0.00 4641.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00
Seismic Transverse 0.00 0.00 637.08 0.00 5504.84 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00
Pier _P2 Pier

9.13 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for Basic Combination
Long Mom Tran Mom
Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN)
Load Cases (KNM) (KNm)

Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL

(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom) 8057.13 230.08 243.50 1836.73 4548.29

Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Accompanying)+Wind Load
(Leading) 7687.40 234.92 434.08 2214.04 6445.63

Case III- Permanent Load+ 20%

LL(Leading) +LL Surcharge (Accom)
+Seismic_Long (During service) 6546.48 0.00 0.00 88.25 318.34

Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20%

LL(Leading) +LL Surcharge (Accom)
+Seismic_Trans (During service) 6546.48 33.24 0.00 226.13 318.34

Case V- Permanent Load+ 20%

LL(Accom) +LL Surcharge (Accom)
+Seismic_Long (During service) 6460.80 0.75 5.65 99.09 303.60

Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20%

LL(Accom) +LL Surcharge (Accom)
+Seismic_Trans (During service) 6460.80 26.23 5.65 204.80 303.60

Case VII- Permanent load

(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Constr
uction) 4527.59 0.00 0.00 24.07 28.65

Case VIII- Permanent load

(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Const
ruction) 4527.59 0.00 0.00 24.07 28.65
9.14 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for Accidental Combination
Long Mom Tran Mom
Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN)
Load Cases (KNM) (KNm)

Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL

(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom) 5408.16 84.60 0.00 553.06 795.86

Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Accompanying)+Wind Load
(Leading) 4742.65 26.30 28.25 293.62 509.93

Case III- Permanent Load+ 20%

LL(Leading) +LL Surcharge (Accom)
+Seismic_Long (During service) 4696.85 0.00 0.00 48.39 159.17

Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20%

LL(Leading) +LL Surcharge (Accom)
+Seismic_Trans (During service) 4696.85 16.62 0.00 117.33 159.17

Case V- Permanent Load+ 20%

LL(Accom) +LL Surcharge (Accom)
+Seismic_Long (During service) 4563.75 0.75 5.65 49.83 101.99

Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20%

LL(Accom) +LL Surcharge (Accom)
+Seismic_Trans (During service) 4563.75 5.18 5.65 68.22 101.99

Case VII- Permanent load

(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Constr
uction) 3320.38 0.00 0.00 17.83 21.22

Case VIII- Permanent load

(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Const
ruction) 3320.38 0.00 0.00 17.83 21.22
Pier _P2 Pier

9.15 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for seismic combination

Long Mom Tran Mom

Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN)
Load Cases (KNM) (KNm)

Case- I-Permanent
load(Service)+LL (Leading)+Wind
Load (Accom) 6190.83 0.00 0.00 17.72 0.00
Case-II-Permanent
load(Service)+LL
(Accompanying)+Wind Load
(Leading) 6338.06 26.30 28.25 298.22 509.93

Case III- Permanent Load+ 20%

LL(Leading) +LL Surcharge
(Accom) +Seismic_Long (During
service) 6190.83 870.24 955.62 6980.09 8257.25
Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20%
LL(Leading) +LL Surcharge
(Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During
service) 6190.83 870.24 955.62 6980.09 8257.25
Case V- Permanent Load+ 20%
LL(Accom) +LL Surcharge
(Accom) +Seismic_Long (During
service) 6220.28 870.99 961.27 7016.79 8359.24
Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20%
LL(Accom) +LL Surcharge
(Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During
service) 6220.28 875.42 961.27 7035.18 8359.24

Case VII- Permanent load

(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Co
nstruction) 4519.29 435.12 0.00 3503.61 21.22

Case VIII- Permanent load

(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(C
onstruction) 4519.29 0.00 477.81 22.42 4149.85

9.14 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for SLS(Quasi Permanent Combination)
Long Mom Tran Mom
Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN)
Load Cases (KNM) (KNm)

Case- I-Permanent
load(Service)+LL (Leading)+Wind
Load (Accom) 4519.03 68.30 0.00 701.76 0.00
Case-II-Permanent
load(Service)+LL
(Accompanying)+Wind Load
(Leading) 4505.54 68.30 0.00 701.76 0.00
Case III- Permanent Load+ 20%
LL(Leading) +LL Surcharge
(Accom) +Seismic_Long (During
service) 4519.03 68.30 0.00 701.76 0.00
Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20%
LL(Leading) +LL Surcharge
(Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During
service) 4519.03 68.30 0.00 701.76 0.00
Case V- Permanent Load+ 20%
LL(Accom) +LL Surcharge
(Accom) +Seismic_Long (During
service) 4516.33 68.30 0.00 701.76 0.00
Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20%
LL(Accom) +LL Surcharge
(Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During
service) 4516.33 68.30 0.00 701.76 0.00
Case VII- Permanent load
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Co
nstruction) 3296.67 34.15 0.00 357.44 0.00
Case VIII- Permanent load
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(C
onstruction) 3296.67 34.15 0.00 357.44 0.00
Pier _P2 Design of Pier using 8.3.2

10.0 DESIGN OF RECTANGULAR PIERS

Fck 25 Mpa Column Dia z y

fy 500 Mpa 5521 x 1300
Area of steel on each face = 0.47 %> 0.12 % OK (Ref Clause 16.3.1 of IRC:112-2011)
Distance between 2 adjacent vertical bar (z-dir)= 129 mm < 200 mm (Ref Clause 16.3.1 of IRC:112-2011)
Distance between 2 adjacent vertical bar (y-dir)= 133 mm < 200 mm (Ref Clause 16.3.1 of IRC:112-2011)
no. of steel on each face of longer side = 42 dia 32 area= 33778.404
no. of steel on opposite face of longer side = 42 dia 32 area= 33778.404
no. of steel on each face ofshorter side = 9 dia 25 area= 4417.8647
for Circular section Total= 71974.673
α= 2
for Rectangular section
NEd/NRd= 0.10 0.70 1.00
α= 1.0 1.5 2.0
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = (d*ecu3)/(es+ecu3)'mm'
Ult. comp strain in the conc (єcu3) = 0.0035
[Link] strain in the steel (єs) = [{fywk/(γs xEs)}+0.002] = 0.0042
Mur,lim = Fc Zlim
Zlim = (d-β2 xlim) Izz= 1.01081E+12 mm4 ry= 1593.781 le= 10852.4
Fc = β1 fcd b xlim Iyy= 1.82314E+13 mm4 rz= 375.278
β1 = 0.80
β2 = 0.40
fcd = αfck/Ƴm
fyd = fyk/Ƴs
λy= 6.809
λz= 28.918
λlim= 20.A.B.C/sqrt(n) Eq. 11.1 of IRC:112-2011
n= NEd/([Link]) for basic combination
Basic Combination & Seismic Combination Accidental Combination

fcd = 11.17 13.96

fyd = 434.78 500.00
Ned 8057.13 5408.16
My (Long)= 7035.18 553.06
Mz (Trans)= 8359.24 795.86
n 0.10 0.05
λlim= 34.00 46.40 NO NEED TO COMPUTE 2ND ORDER MOMENT
Taking A= 0.70
B= 1.10
C= 0.70
Pier _P2 Design of Pier using 8.3.2

Computation of Ultimate Moment of Resistance

1. Basic & Seismic Combination [Link] Combination

Long Dir Trans Dir Long Dir Trans Dir
Es= 200000 200000 200000 200000
d= 1168.00 5389.0 mm 1168.00 5389.02 mm
Xlim= 532.71 2457.88 mm 532.71 2457.88 mm
Zlim= 954.91 4405.87 954.91 4405.87
NRd= 107160.37 107160.37 KN 80744.88 80744.88 KN
NEd/NRd= 0.075 0.050 0.067 0.067
α= 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d'= 66.00 66.00 66.00 66.00
spacing= 129.07 612.00 mm 129.07 612.00 mm
Xu= 167.32 724.51 mm 127.76 387.56 mm
ϵyd= 0.002174 0.002174 0.002500 0.002500
ϵcu3= 0.00350 0.00350 0.00350 0.00350
b= 5521.02 1300.00 mm 5521.02 1300.00 mm
β1fcdbxu = 8252.353779 8413.934754 7876.55 5626.09 KN
sum of fs As= -368.25 0.00 KN -2571.19 0.00 KN
NRd (assumed)= 7884.10 8413.93 KN 5305.36 5626.09 KN
NEd (assumed)-NEd= -173.02 356.81 KN -102.80 217.93 KN
β1fcdbxu(h/2-0.42xu) = 4239.45 20111.12 KNm 4177.26 14243.76 KNm
sum(fsAs(h/2-d)= 16962.80 10351.28 KNm 18394.71 11903.98 KNm
Mrdy= 21202.25 30462.41 KNm 22571.97 26147.73 KNm
My/Mrdy= 0.394 0.231 0.63 0.035 0.021 0.06
OK OK
Total Horzt. Reinforcement = max of 8996.83 mm2 and (Ref Clause 16.3.2 of IRC:112-2011)
3588.66 mm2
Min Dia of Horizontal Reinf = max of 8 mm
Ht of Pier Shaft= 8348.00 mm
Hence, provide 16 mm dia -no. 45
spacing= 187 say 150 mm

Binder and Ties

spacing shall not exceed the least of following 1) least lateral dimension of column
(Ref Clause 16.2.3 of IRC:112-2011) 2) twelve times the dia. of smallest lonitudnal bar
3) 200 mm

dia. of bar shall not be less than following 1) one-fourth the dia. of largest longitudnal bar
2) 8mm
so provide 12 mm dia bar @ 129 mm horizontally and 150 vertically
Pier _P2 CW-pier shaft

11.0 Crack Width Check for Pier Shaft

Concrete Grade fck = 25

Concrete Modulus Ec = 30000 N/mm2
Steel Modulus Es = 200 KN/mm2
Service Stage Moment = 701.76 KNm
Allowable crackwidth wadm = 0.3 mm
Section depth d = 1300 mm
Section width bt = 5521 mm
Minimum cover cmin = 75 mm
Bar spacing s = 129 mm
Bar diameter f = 32 mm
Effective depth h = 1209.00 mm
Area of tensile steel As = 35987.34 mm2
Area of compression steel As' = 35987.34 mm2
M under Serviceability Limit State(SLS)= 701.76 KN-m

11.1 Check for Reinforcement (As per Clause [Link] )

Total Vertical Steel in tension and compression = 71975 mm2

Minimum area of Steel 0.0024Ac = 17225.57 OK
Maximum area of Steel 0.04Ac = 287092.92 OK

Check for Cracking

Depth to neutral axis = 650 mm
Second Moment of Inertia, I = 1.01081E+12 mm4
If the section is uncracked, compressive and tensile stress at the top and bottom of the section respectivley
would be σtop =σbottom = M*y/I = 0.451 Mpa
From Table 6.5, fctm corresponding to M 25 = 2.2 Mpa
Since, 2.2 > 0.451
Therefore the section is uncracked
Pier _P2 Check for Base Pressure

12.0 Check For Base Pressure

12.1 Calculation of self wt of Foundation and surcharge wt :

Safe Bearing Capacity= 250 KN/sqm

Unit Wt. of Soil= 18 KN/m3
Foundation Dimension at bottom at top
B(y) = 6.50 m 1.40
L(x) = 7.50 m 5.90
Thk of foundation at tip = 1.000 m
Total Thk of foundation = 1.800 m
Foundation Level= 89.040 m
Ground Level = 96.540 m
Self wt of Foundation

Volume of Foundation = 48.75 + 20.55

(rec) (trapezoidal)
= 69.30 m3
Wt of Foundation = 69.30 x 25 = 1732.6 KN
Selfweight of Foundation = 1733 kN

Wt of Soil surcharge
Volume of soil surcharge = 296
Wt of soil surcharge = 296 x 18 = 5333.78 KN
Wt of Earth surcharge = 5334 kN

A= BxL= 48.75 m2
ZYY = ZT = 52.813 m3
Z XX = ZL = 60.938 m3

12.2 Summary of loads and Moment @ base of foundation as per IRC:78-2014

Load Cases Load HL HT Long Mom Tran Mom

Permanent Load during service
Dead Load of S.S 2219.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
W.C. 225.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Dead Load form Sub-Str & Found 3806.9 0.0 0.0 13.1 0.0
Permanent Load (During construction)
Dead Load of S.S 1109.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (Except w.c.) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (only for w.c.) 112.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Dead Load form Sub-Str. 3806.9 0.0 0.0 13.1 0.0
Variable Load (Leading)
Max LL (Leading) 1185.5 0.0 0.0 235.1 1061.1
FPLL (Leading) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Horizontal Force (Leading) 0.0 112.8 0.0 484.8 0.0
Horizontal Force (Leading) for Long Seis 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Horizontal Force (Leading) for Trans Seis 0.0 22.2 0.0 91.9 0.0
Centrifugal Force (Leading) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Wind force (Leading) 97.8 67.6 270.6 821.3 3285.1
Variable Load (Accompanying)
Max LL (Accompanying) 1185.5 0.0 0.0 235.1 1061.1
FPLL ((Accompanying)) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL surcharge due to track ((Accompanying)) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Horizontal Force ((Accompanying)) 0.0 112.8 0.0 484.8 0.0
Horizontal Force (Acc) for Long Seis 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Horizontal Force (Acc) for Trans Seis 0.0 22.2 0.0 91.9 0.0
Centrifugal Force (Accomanying) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Wind force (Accompanying) 97.8 67.6 270.6 821.3 3285.1
Variable Load (During construction)
Max LL 118.6 0.0 0.0 23.5 106.1
FPLL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Horizontal Force 0.0 11.3 0.0 48.5 0.0
Centrifugal Force 0.0 11.3 0.0 48.5 0.0
Hydraulic Load (Accompanying)
Water current forces 3.7 28.2 136.5 297.7
Buoyant force -89.9
Seismic Effect (During service)
Seismic Longitudinal 0.0 580.2 0.0 4641.6 0.0
Seismic Transverse 0.0 0.0 637.1 0.0 5504.8
Seismic Effect (During construction)
Seismic Longitudinal 0.0 580.2 0.0 4641.6 0.0
Seismic Transverse 0.0 0.0 637.1 0.0 5504.8

12.3 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) as per Clause 706.1.1 of IRC:78-2014

Gross
Max Base Min Base Bearing
Long Mom Tran Mom Pressure Pressure Pressure
Load Cases Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN) (KNM) (KNm) (KN/m2) (KN/m2) (KN/m2) Check
Pier _P2 Check for Base Pressure

Combination- I
DL + (LL or Snow Load)+ WC + Frictional Force at
Bearing+ Breaking Force +Buoyancy + Centrifugal
Force + Earth Pressure
7347.26 116.54 28.25 869.55 1358.85 190.71 110.71 385.0 OK
Combination-II

i) Comination -I +(WL)
7445.07 184.18 298.81 1690.82 4643.92 268.40 37.04 512.1 OK

ii) Combination-I + (Seismic_Long)

6398.85 583.90 28.25 4838.24 509.93 220.31 42.21 577.5 OK

ii) Combination-I + (Seismic_Transv)

6398.85 25.90 665.33 288.58 6014.76 249.88 12.63 577.5 OK
Combination-III
DL + WC + Buoyancy + Earth Pressure + Erection
Effect + Frictional Force at Bearing+ WL
6259.56 184.18 298.81 1455.72 3582.77 220.13 36.67 512.1 OK
DL + WC + Buoyancy + Earth Pressure + Erection
Effect + Frictional Force at Bearing+ Seismic
Force_Long
6161.75 583.90 28.25 4791.22 297.70 210.66 42.13 577.5 OK
DL + WC + Buoyancy + Earth Pressure + Erection
Effect + Frictional Force at Bearing+ Seismic
Force_Trans
6161.75 25.90 665.33 241.56 5802.53 240.23 12.56 577.5 OK

Allowance for tension at the base of foundation in case of rock

assume L= 7.930
B= 9.150
Area= 72.56 reduction in area = 33 % OK
ZL= 110.65
ZT= 95.90
DL + WC + Buoyancy + Earth Pressure + Erection Effect + Frictional Force at Bearing+ Seismic Force_Trans
P= 6161.75
ML= 241.56
MT= 5802.53
Max Pr= 148
Min Pr= 22
Pier _P2 LWL

13.0
13.1 Calculation of self wt of Foundation and surcharge wt :

Safe Bearing Capacity= 250 KN/sqm

Unit Wt. of Soil= 18 KN/m3
Foundation Dimension at bottom at top
B(y) = 6.50 m 1.40
L(x) = 7.50 m 5.90
Thk of foundation at tip = 1.000 m
Total Thk of foundation = 1.800 m
Foundation Level= 89.040 m
Ground Level = 96.540 m
Self wt of Foundation

Volume of Foundation = 48.75+ 20.55

(rec) (trapezoidal)
= 69.30 m3
Wt of Foundation = 69.30 x 25 = 1732.6 KN
Selfweight of Foundation = 1733 kN

Wt of Soil surcharge

Volume of soil surcharge = 296

Wt of soil surcharge = 296 x 18 = 5333.78 KN
Wt of Earth surcharge = 5334 kN

A= BxL= 48.75 m2
ZYY = ZT = 52.813 m3
Z XX = ZL = 60.938 m3

13.2 Summary of loads and Moment @ base of foundation as per Table B.4 of IRC:6-2017

Safety for accidental

Safety for seismic

Safety for Quasi-

Partial Factor of

Partial Factor of

Partial Factor of

Partial Factor of

Partial Factor of
Combination-II
Combination-I

Combination
combination

combination

permanent
Safety for

Safety for
Load Cases Load HL HT Long Mom Tran Mom
Permanent Load during service
Dead Load of S.S 2219.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00 1.00
SIDL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00 1.00
W.C. 225.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.75 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00
Dead Load form Sub-Str & Found 3806.9 0.0 0.0 13.1 0.0 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00 1.00
Shrinkage Effect 0.0 68.3 0.0 688.6 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Permanent Load (During construction)
Dead Load of S.S 1109.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00 1.00
SIDL (Except w.c.) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00 1.00
SIDL (only for w.c.) 112.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.75 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00
Dead Load form Sub-Str. 3806.9 0.0 0.0 13.1 0.0 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00 1.00
Shrinkage Effect 0.0 68.3 0.0 688.6 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Variable Load (Leading)
Max LL (Leading) 1185.5 0.0 0.0 235.1 1061.1 1.50 1.30 0.75 0.75 0.00
FPLL (Leading) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.50 1.30 0.75 0.75 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) 0.0 112.8 0.0 484.8 0.0 1.50 1.30 0.75 0.75 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) Long Seis 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.50 1.30 0.75 0.75 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading)Trans Seis 0.0 22.2 0.0 91.9 0.0 1.50 1.30 0.75 0.75 0.00
Centrifugal Force (Leading) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.50 1.30 0.75 0.75 0.00
Wind force (Leading) 97.8 67.6 270.6 821.3 3285.1 1.50 1.30 0.00 0.00 0.00
Variable Load (Accompanying)
Max LL (Accompanying) 1185.5 0.0 0.0 235.1 1061.1 1.15 1.00 0.20 0.20 0.00
FPLL ((Accompanying)) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.15 1.00 0.20 0.20 0.00
Horizontal Force ((Accompanying)) 0.0 112.8 0.0 484.8 0.0 1.15 1.00 0.20 0.20 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading) Long Seis 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.15 1.00 0.20 0.20 0.00
Horizontal Force (Leading)Trans Seis 0.0 22.2 0.0 91.9 0.0 1.15 1.00 0.20 0.20 0.00
Centrifugal Force (Accomanying) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.15 1.00 0.20 0.20 0.00
Wind force (Accompanying) 97.8 67.6 270.6 821.3 3285.1 0.90 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00
Variable Load (During construction)
Max LL 118.6 0.0 0.0 23.5 106.1 1.35 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
FPLL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.35 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Horizontal Force 0.0 11.3 0.0 48.5 0.0 1.35 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Centrifugal Force 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.35 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Seismic Effect (During service)
Seismic Longitudinal 0.0 580.2 0.0 4641.6 0.0 0.00 0.00 1.50 1.00 0.00
Seismic Transverse 0.0 0.0 637.1 0.0 5504.8 0.00 0.00 1.50 1.00 0.00
Seismic Effect (During construction)
Seismic Longitudinal 0.0 580.2 0.0 4641.6 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.50 0.00
Seismic Transverse 0.0 0.0 637.1 0.0 5504.8 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.50 0.00

13.3 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for Combination-I
Pier _P2 LWL

Long Mom Tran Mom

Load Cases Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN) (KNM) (KNm)
Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom) 10396.13 230.08 243.50 1836.73 4548.29
Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Accompanying)+Wind Load (Leading) 10039.89 231.18 405.84 2077.52 6147.93
Case III- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading)
+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long
(During service) 8885.49 0.00 0.00 88.25 318.34
Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading)
+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans
(During service) 8885.49 33.24 0.00 226.13 318.34
Case V- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom)
+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long
(During service) 8802.50 0.00 0.00 71.79 244.06
Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom)
+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans
(During service) 8802.50 25.48 0.00 177.50 244.06
Case VII- Permanent load
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction) 8561.84 15.23 0.00 89.52 28.65
Case VIII- Permanent load
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction) 8561.84 15.23 0.00 89.52 28.65

13.4 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for Combination-II

Long Mom Tran Mom

Load Cases Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN) (KNM) (KNm)
Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom) 7871.03 200.75 216.45 1606.03 4007.55
Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Accompanying)+Wind
Case Load
III- Permanent Load+ (Leading)
20% LL(Leading) 7564.29 200.73 351.73 1800.69 5331.75
+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long
(During
Case IV-service)
Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) 6559.85 0.00 0.00 74.25 275.90
+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans
(During
Case V- service)
Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) 6559.85 28.81 0.00 193.75 275.90
+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long
(During
Case VI-service)
Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) 6488.72 0.00 0.00 60.15 212.23
+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans
(During service) 6488.72 22.16 0.00 152.06 212.23

Case VII- Permanent load

(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction) 6275.33 11.28 0.00 66.31 21.22
Case VIII- Permanent load
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction) 6275.33 11.28 0.00 66.31 21.22
Pier _P2 LWL

13.5 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for Seismic Combination

Long Mom Tran Mom

Load Cases Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN) (KNM) (KNm)
Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom) 9418.97 84.60 0.00 557.65 795.86
Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Accompanying)+Wind
Case Load
III- Permanent Load+ (Leading)
20% LL(Leading) 8766.94 22.56 0.00 161.70 212.23
+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long
(During
Case IV-service)
Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) 8707.66 870.24 0.00 7015.35 159.17
+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans
(During
Case V- service)
Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) 8707.66 16.62 955.62 121.92 8416.43
+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long
(During service) 8577.25 870.24 0.00 6989.49 42.45

Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom)

+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans
(During service) 8577.25 4.43 955.62 45.51 8299.70

Case VII- Permanent load

(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction) 8553.54 446.40 0.00 3552.09 21.22
Case VIII- Permanent load
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction) 8553.54 11.28 477.81 70.90 4149.85

13.6 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for accidental Combination
Long Mom Tran Mom
Load Cases Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN) (KNM) (KNm)
Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom) 7140.75 84.60 0.00 553.06 795.86

Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Accompanying)+Wind Load (Leading) 6488.72 22.56 0.00 157.11 212.23
Case III- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading)
+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long
(During service) 6429.45 580.16 0.00 4689.97 159.17

Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading)

+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans
(During service) 6429.45 16.62 637.08 117.33 5664.01

Case V- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom)

+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long
(During service) 6299.04 580.16 0.00 4664.11 42.45

Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom)

+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans
(During service) 6299.04 4.43 637.08 40.91 5547.28

Case VII- Permanent load

(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction) 6251.62 290.08 0.00 2333.91 0.00
Case VIII- Permanent load
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction) 6251.62 0.00 318.54 13.13 2752.42

13.7 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for Quassi_permanent Combination

Long Mom Tran Mom

Load Cases Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN) (KNM) (KNm)
Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom) 6251.62 0.00 0.00 13.13 0.00
Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Accompanying)+Wind Load (Leading) 6251.62 0.00 0.00 13.13 0.00
Case III- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading)
+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long
(During service) 6251.62 0.00 0.00 13.13 0.00
Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading)
+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans
(During service) 6251.62 0.00 0.00 13.13 0.00
Case V- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom)
+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long
(During service) 6251.62 0.00 0.00 13.13 0.00
Pier _P2 LWL

Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom)

+LL Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans
(During service) 6251.62 0.00 0.00 13.13 0.00
Case VII- Permanent load
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction) 6251.62 0.00 0.00 13.13 0.00
Case VIII- Permanent load
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction) 6251.62 0.00 0.00 13.13 0.00
Pier _P2 Footing RCC

14.0 Design of Footing

The design is done for the critical cases of Normal, Wind and Seismic (Factored Loads/ Moments )
2.55 1.4 T 2.55

0.80

L
7.50 5.90 5.90

1.40
PLAN 6.50 T

7500
SECTION

800
1000

2550 1400 2550

P2 P4 P3 P1

length width
Size of the Footing = 7.50 x 6.50 m
Depth of the Footing = 1.80 m
C/S Area of footing = 48.75 m2
2 3
Section Modulus ZL x = 6.50
7.50 = 60.94 m
6
2 3
ZT = 7.50 x 6.50 = 52.81 m
6
For design of footing, the net pressure is considered Hence, overburden is not considered.

Selfweight of footing =
Volume of rectangular part 6.5 X 7.50 X 1.0 = 48.75 m3

Volume of trapezoidal section part A1 = 1.40 X 5.90 = 8.26 m2

A2 = 6.50 X 7.50 = 48.75 m2

Volume = (A1 + A2 + A1 x A2 ) X H = 20.55 m3

3
Total Volume = 69.30 m3

Therefore selfweight of foundation = 1732.60 KN

14.1 For Combination I

For longitudnal direction
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom)

(Construction)+Seismic_Long(

(Construction)+Seismic_Trans
20% LL(Accom) +LL Surcharge

20% LL(Accom) +LL Surcharge

(Construction)+Variable load

(Construction)+Variable load
(Accompanying)+Wind Load

Case IV- Permanent Load+

Case VI- Permanent Load+

Case III- Permanent Load+

Case VIII- Permanent load

Case V- Permanent Load+

Case VII- Permanent load

(Accom) +Seismic_Trans
+Seismic_Trans (During

(Accom) +Seismic_Long
+Seismic_Long (During

20% LL(Leading) +LL

20% LL(Leading) +LL

Surcharge (Accom)
Surcharge (Accom)
Case-II-Permanent
Case- I-Permanent

Quasi-Permanent
load(Service)+LL

load(Service)+LL

(During service)

(During service)

(Construction)
Construction)

Combination
(Leading)

service)

service)

P 10396.13 10039.89 8885.49 8885.49 8802.50 8802.50 8561.84 8561.84 6251.62

ML 1836.73 2077.52 88.25 226.13 71.79 177.50 89.52 89.52 13.13
MT 4548.29 6147.93 318.34 318.34 244.06 244.06 28.65 28.65 0.00
P/A (a) 213.25 205.95 182.27 182.27 180.56 180.56 175.63 175.63 128.24
ML/ZL (b) 30.14 34.09 1.45 3.71 1.18 2.91 1.47 1.47 0.22
MT/ZT © 86.12 116.41 6.03 6.03 4.62 4.62 0.54 0.54 0.00
a+b-c 157.27 123.63 177.69 179.95 177.12 178.86 176.55 176.55 128.45
a-b-c 96.99 55.44 174.79 172.53 174.76 173.03 173.62 173.62 128.02
P1 157.27 123.63 177.69 179.95 177.12 178.86 176.55 176.55 128.45
P2 96.99 55.44 174.79 172.53 174.76 173.03 173.62 173.62 128.02
P3 133.62 96.88 176.55 177.04 176.20 176.57 175.40 175.40 128.28
P4 120.64 82.19 175.93 175.44 175.69 175.32 174.77 174.77 128.19
Avg Pressure In found 145.45 110.25 177.12 178.49 176.66 177.71 175.98 175.98 128.37
CG of varying pr. Frm column face 1.31 1.33 1.28 1.28 1.28 1.28 1.28 1.28 1.28
Net Moment 3642.80 2797.18 4323.54 4364.29 4311.47 4342.71 4295.79 4295.79 3130.89
d effective (m)= 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69
Shear = 934.87 708.66 1138.43 1147.27 1135.47 1142.25 1131.10 1131.10 825.09
Net Shear = 934.87 708.66 1138.43 1147.27 1135.47 1142.25 1131.10 1131.10 825.09
Punching Shear at 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39
Punching Shear = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Net Punch. Sh = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
For Transverse Direction
a+b-c 157.27 123.63 177.69 179.95 177.12 178.86 176.55 176.55 128.45
a+b+c 329.52 356.45 189.74 192.01 186.36 188.10 177.64 177.64 128.45
P1 157.27 123.63 177.69 179.95 177.12 178.86 176.55 176.55 128.45
P2 329.52 356.45 189.74 192.01 186.36 188.10 177.64 177.64 128.45
P3 224.85 214.97 182.42 184.68 180.75 182.48 176.98 176.98 128.45
P4 261.94 265.11 185.01 187.28 182.74 184.47 177.21 177.21 128.45
Avg Pre. In toe 243.40 240.04 183.71 185.98 181.74 183.48 177.10 177.10 128.45
CG of varying pr. 1.12 1.07 1.26 1.26 1.26 1.26 1.27 1.27 1.28
Moment 1423.38 1334.19 1204.71 1219.71 1194.74 1206.24 1172.95 1172.95 851.65
d effective (m)= 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69
Shear at face of column= 4654.93 4590.75 3513.54 3556.81 3475.82 3509.00 3386.97 3386.97 2456.68
Net Shear = 4654.93 4590.75 3513.54 3556.81 3475.82 3509.00 3386.97 3386.97 2456.68

Longitudinal Transverse
Design Moment = 4364.29 kNm for whole width of footing 1423.38 kNm for whole width of footing
Design Shear = 1147.27 kN for whole width of footing 4654.93 kN for whole width of footing
Design Punching shear= 0.00 kN

Check for effective width for long dirn

C+3d = 1.40 + 5.079 = 6.48 < 6.50 use eff width
Check for effective width for trans dirn
Pier _P2 Footing RCC

C+3d = 5.90 + 5.079 = 10.98 > 7.50 OK

Perimeter for Punching Shear

Perimeter = 12.672 X 4 = 50.688 m X 1.69 = 85.81 sqm
Punching shear stress = 0.00 / 85.81 = 0.00 kN/sqm
= 0.00 MPA OK
Allowable Shear Stress in Punching = 0.134(1-fck/310)fck = 3.08 MPA
(Cl 8.4.6 of IRC:SP:105-2015)

14.2 For Combination II

For longitudnal direction

Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL

Case III- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL

Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL

Case V- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL

(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction)
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction)
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During

(Accompanying)+Wind Load (Leading)
Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL
Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom)

(Construction)+Variable load

(Construction)+Variable load
Case VIII- Permanent load
Case VII- Permanent load
service)

service)

service)

service)
P 7871.03 7564.29 6559.85 6559.85 6488.72 6488.72 6275.33 6275.33
ML 1606.03 1800.69 74.25 193.75 60.15 152.06 66.31 66.31
MT 4007.55 5331.75 275.90 275.90 212.23 212.23 21.22 21.22
P/A (a) 161.46 155.16 134.56 134.56 133.10 133.10 128.72 128.72
ML/ZL (b) 26.36 29.55 1.22 3.18 0.99 2.50 1.09 1.09
MT/ZT © 75.88 100.96 5.22 5.22 4.02 4.02 0.40 0.40
a+b-c 111.93 83.76 130.56 132.52 130.07 131.58 129.41 129.41
a-b-c 59.22 24.66 128.12 126.16 128.10 126.59 127.23 127.23
P1 111.93 83.76 130.56 132.52 130.07 131.58 129.41 129.41
P2 59.22 24.66 128.12 126.16 128.10 126.59 127.23 127.23
P3 91.25 60.57 129.60 130.02 129.30 129.62 128.56 128.56
P4 79.90 47.84 129.07 128.65 128.87 128.55 128.09 128.09
Avg Pressure In found 101.59 72.17 130.08 131.27 129.68 130.60 128.98 128.98
CG of varying pr. Frm column face 1.32 1.34 1.28 1.28 1.28 1.28 1.28 1.28
Net Moment 2561.26 1853.95 3175.74 3211.05 3165.39 3192.55 3148.67 3148.67
d effective (m)= 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69
Shear = 652.97 463.85 836.07 843.73 833.54 839.43 829.05 829.05
Net Shear = 652.97 463.85 836.07 843.73 833.54 839.43 829.05 829.05
Punching Shear at 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39
Punching Shear = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Net Punch. Sh = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
For Transverse Direction
a+b-c 111.93 83.76 130.56 132.52 130.07 131.58 129.41 129.41
a+b+c 263.70 285.67 141.00 142.96 138.11 139.62 130.21 130.21
P1 111.93 83.76 130.56 132.52 130.07 131.58 129.41 129.41
P2 263.70 285.67 141.00 142.96 138.11 139.62 130.21 130.21
P3 171.47 162.97 134.65 136.62 133.22 134.73 129.73 129.73
P4 204.16 206.46 136.90 138.87 134.95 136.46 129.90 129.90
Avg Pre. In toe 187.81 184.71 135.78 137.74 134.09 135.60 129.81 129.81
CG of varying pr. 1.10 1.04 1.26 1.26 1.26 1.26 1.27 1.27
Moment 1077.50 1001.54 888.67 901.67 880.13 890.13 859.77 859.77
d effective (m)= 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69
Shear at face of column= 3591.91 3532.67 2596.78 2634.29 2564.45 2593.30 2482.67 2482.67
Net Shear = 3591.91 3532.67 2596.78 2634.29 2564.45 2593.30 2482.67 2482.67
Pier _P2 Footing RCC

Longitudinal Transverse
Design Moment = 3211.05 kNm for whole width of footing 1077.50 kNm for whole width of footing
Design Shear = 843.73 kN for whole width of footing 3591.91 kN for whole width of footing
Design Punching shear= 0.00 kN

Check for effective width for long dirn

C+3d = 1.40 + 5.079 = 6.48 < 6.50 use eff width
Check for effective width for trans dirn
C+3d = 5.90 + 5.079 = 10.98 > 7.50 OK

Perimeter for Punching Shear

Perimeter = 12.672 X 4 = 50.688 m X 1.69 = 85.81 sqm
Punching shear stress = 0.00 / 85.81 = 0.00 kN/sqm OK
Allowable Shear Stress in Punching = 0.134(1-fck/310)fck = 3.08 MPA
(Cl 8.4.6 of IRC:SP:105-2015)

14.3 For Seismic Combination

For longitudnal direction

Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL

Case III- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL

Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL

Case V- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL

(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction)
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction)
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During

(Accompanying)+Wind Load (Leading)
Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL
Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom)

(Construction)+Variable load

(Construction)+Variable load
Case VIII- Permanent load
Case VII- Permanent load
service)

service)

service)

service)
P 9418.97 8766.94 8707.66 8707.66 8577.25 8577.25 8553.54 8553.54
ML 557.65 161.70 7015.35 121.92 6989.49 45.51 3552.09 70.90
MT 795.86 212.23 159.17 8416.43 42.45 8299.70 21.22 4149.85
P/A (a) 193.21 179.83 178.62 178.62 175.94 175.94 175.46 175.46
ML/ZL (b) 9.15 2.65 115.12 2.00 114.70 0.75 58.29 1.16
MT/ZT © 15.07 4.02 3.01 159.36 0.80 157.15 0.40 78.58
a+b-c 187.29 178.47 290.73 21.26 289.84 19.54 233.35 98.04
a-b-c 168.99 173.16 60.48 17.25 60.44 18.04 116.76 95.72
P1 187.29 178.47 290.73 21.26 289.84 19.54 233.35 98.04
P2 168.99 173.16 60.48 17.25 60.44 18.04 116.76 95.72
P3 180.11 176.39 200.40 19.69 199.84 18.95 187.61 97.13
P4 176.17 175.24 150.81 18.82 150.44 18.63 162.50 96.63
Avg Pressure In found 183.70 177.43 245.56 20.47 244.84 19.24 210.48 97.59
CG of varying pr. Frm column face 1.28 1.28 1.35 1.29 1.35 1.28 1.32 1.28
Net Moment 4508.62 4334.95 6355.04 505.53 6336.06 471.62 5318.25 2383.32
d effective (m)= 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69
Shear = 1180.74 1140.42 1578.37 131.57 1573.72 123.69 1352.85 627.24
Net Shear = 1180.74 1140.42 1578.37 131.57 1573.72 123.69 1352.85 627.24
Punching Shear at 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39
Punching Shear = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Net Punch. Sh = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

For Transverse Direction

a+b-c 187.29 178.47 290.73 21.26 289.84 19.54 233.35 98.04
a+b+c 217.43 186.51 296.76 339.98 291.45 333.84 234.15 255.20
P1 187.29 178.47 290.73 21.26 289.84 19.54 233.35 98.04
P2 217.43 186.51 296.76 339.98 291.45 333.84 234.15 255.20
P3 199.12 181.62 293.09 146.29 290.47 142.84 233.66 159.70
P4 205.61 183.35 294.39 214.94 290.82 210.54 233.83 193.55
Avg Pre. In toe 202.36 182.49 293.74 180.62 290.64 176.69 233.75 176.62
CG of varying pr. 1.24 1.27 1.27 0.90 1.27 0.90 1.27 1.09
Moment 1308.35 1201.02 1940.85 845.31 1925.19 824.15 1548.86 997.34
d effective (m)= 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69
Shear at face of column= 3870.15 3490.09 5617.82 3454.35 5558.55 3379.20 4470.43 3377.87
Net Shear = 3870.15 3490.09 5617.82 3454.35 5558.55 3379.20 4470.43 3377.87

Longitudinal Transverse
Design Moment = 6355.04 kNm for whole width of footing 1940.85 kNm for whole width of footing
Design Shear = 1578.37 kN for whole width of footing 5617.82 kN for whole width of footing
Design Punching shear= 0.00 kN

Check for effective width for long dirn

C+3d = 1.40 + 5.079 = 6.48 < 6.50 use eff width
Check for effective width for trans dirn
C+3d = 5.90 + 5.079 = 10.98 > 7.50 OK
Perimeter for Punching Shear
Perimeter = 12.672 X 4 = 50.688 m X 1.69 = 85.81 sqm
Punching shear stress = 0.00 / 85.81 = 0.00 kN/sqm OK
Allowable Shear Stress in Punching = 0.134(1-fck/310)fck = 3.08 MPA
(Cl 8.4.6 of IRC:SP:105-2015)
Pier _P2 Footing RCC

14.4 For Accidental Combination

For longitudnal direction

Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL

Case III- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL

Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL

Case V- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL

(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction)
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction)
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During

(Accompanying)+Wind Load (Leading)
Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL
Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom)

(Construction)+Variable load

(Construction)+Variable load
Case VIII- Permanent load
Case VII- Permanent load
service)

service)

service)

service)
P 7140.75 6488.72 6429.45 6429.45 6299.04 6299.04 6251.62 6251.62
ML 553.06 157.11 4689.97 117.33 4664.11 40.91 2333.91 13.13
MT 795.86 212.23 159.17 5664.01 42.45 5547.28 0.00 2752.42
P/A (a) 146.48 133.10 131.89 131.89 129.21 129.21 128.24 128.24
ML/ZL (b) 9.08 2.58 76.96 1.93 76.54 0.67 38.30 0.22
MT/ZT © 15.07 4.02 3.01 107.25 0.80 105.04 0.00 52.12
a+b-c 140.48 131.66 205.84 26.56 204.95 24.85 166.54 76.34
a-b-c 122.33 126.51 51.91 22.71 51.87 23.50 89.94 75.91
P1 140.48 131.66 205.84 26.56 204.95 24.85 166.54 76.34
P2 122.33 126.51 51.91 22.71 51.87 23.50 89.94 75.91
P3 133.36 129.64 145.45 25.05 144.89 24.32 136.49 76.17
P4 129.45 128.53 112.30 24.22 111.92 24.03 119.99 76.08
Avg Pressure In found 136.92 130.65 175.64 25.81 174.92 24.58 151.51 76.25
CG of varying pr. Frm column face 1.29 1.28 1.35 1.29 1.35 1.28 1.32 1.28
Net Moment 3367.72 3194.04 4528.35 635.47 4509.37 601.55 3816.68 1860.06
d effective (m)= 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69
Shear = 880.07 839.75 1128.94 165.89 1124.30 158.00 973.85 490.11
Net Shear = 880.07 839.75 1128.94 165.89 1124.30 158.00 973.85 490.11
Punching Shear at 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39 3.39
Punching Shear = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Net Punch. Sh = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

For Transverse Direction

a+b-c 140.48 131.66 205.84 26.56 204.95 24.85 166.54 76.34
a+b+c 170.62 139.70 211.86 241.06 206.55 234.92 166.54 180.57
P1 140.48 131.66 205.84 26.56 204.95 24.85 166.54 76.34
P2 170.62 139.70 211.86 241.06 206.55 234.92 166.54 180.57
P3 152.31 134.81 208.20 110.71 205.58 107.26 166.54 117.23
P4 158.80 136.55 209.50 156.91 205.92 152.51 166.54 139.68
Avg Pre. In toe 155.55 135.68 208.85 133.81 205.75 129.88 166.54 128.45
CG of varying pr. 1.23 1.26 1.27 0.93 1.27 0.93 1.28 1.10
Moment 998.01 890.68 1378.01 650.15 1362.35 628.99 1104.15 736.47
d effective (m)= 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.69
Shear at face of column= 2974.95 2594.88 3994.25 2559.15 3934.97 2484.00 3185.05 2456.68
Net Shear = 2974.95 2594.88 3994.25 2559.15 3934.97 2484.00 3185.05 2456.68

Longitudinal Transverse
Design Moment = 4528.35 kNm for whole width of footing 1378.01 kNm for whole width of footing
Design Shear = 1128.94 kN for whole width of footing 3994.25 kN for whole width of footing
Design Punching shear= 0.00 kN

Check for effective width for long dirn

C+3d = 1.40 + 5.079 = 6.48 < 6.50 use eff width
Check for effective width for trans dirn
C+3d = 5.90 + 5.079 = 10.98 > 7.50 OK

Perimeter for Punching Shear

Perimeter = 12.672 X 4 = 50.688 m X 1.69 = 85.81 sqm
Punching shear stress = 0.00 / 85.81 = 0.00 kN/sqm OK
Allowable Shear Stress in Punching = 0.134(1-fck/310)fck = 0.00 MPA
(Cl 8.4.6 of IRC:SP:105-2015)
Pier _P2 Design of Footing Long

15.0 Design of Foundation

ALL DISTANCES ARE IN M, STRESSES IN MPA, FORCES IN KN AND MOMENTS IN KNM
ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE CHECK FOR MOMENT, SHEAR AND TORSION AS PER IRC:112-2011
Table 6.5 of IRC-112-2011
Density Concrete (kn/cu.m) 25 Beam fck 25 Mpa Ec 30000 Mpa
Pier fck 25 Mpa Ec 30000 Mpa
Sectional Properties
Load Case case 1 case 2 case 3 case 4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Section at Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn
LC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
No. of webs 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Width of TOP beam, B (mm) 7500 7500 7500 7500 7500 7500 7500 7500
Depth of top beam, D (mm) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Area of Sec I 13.500 13.500 13.500 13.500 13.500 13.500 13.500 13.500
Moment of Inertia (I) m4 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645
C.G. of section frm top 900.000 900.000 900.000 900.000 900.000 900.000 900.000 900.000
C.G. of Sec I from top 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900
Moment of Inertia of combined
3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645
section (I) m4
Area of Girder m2 13.50 13.50 13.50 13.50 13.50 13.50 13.50 13.50
Perimeter of Girder m 18.60 18.60 18.60 18.60 18.60 18.60 18.60 18.60
Moment of Inertia m4 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645
depth of section m 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800
CG of Section (bot) m 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900
Z bot of section m4 4.050 4.050 4.050 4.050 4.050 4.050 4.050 4.050
Z top of section m4 4.050 4.050 4.050 4.050 4.050 4.050 4.050 4.050
Width of Web m 7.500 7.500 7.500 7.500 7.500 7.500 7.500 7.500
Grade of concrete =M 25 MPa
Grade of steel = Fe 500
(fck) = 25.00
(fywk) = 500.00 (fywk)/γ 434.782609 N/mm2
Ten. strength of conc (fctm) = 2.20 N/mm2 Table-6.5, p-38,IRC-112
Design yld of shear reinf fywd = 0.8*fyk/γs = 347.83 N/mm2 Clause-[Link] P-91
[Link]. factor for conc (γm) = 1.50 MPa Clause-[Link] P-49
Part. mat factor for Steel (γs) = 1.15 MPa Clause-6.2.2 P-30
Ult. comp strain in the conc (єcu3) = 0.0035 Basic Table-6.5, p-38,IRC-112
[Link] of reinforcing of steel (Es) = 200000 Basic Clause-6.2.2 P-29
[Link] of concrete (Ecm) = 30000 Table-6.5, p-38,IRC-112
modular ratio αe (Es/Ecm) = 6.67 N/mm2
[Link] strain in the steel (єs) = [{fywk/(γs xEs)}+0.002] = 0.0042 MPa IS 456 clause 38.1
[Link] influence of the concrete strength (a) = 0.67 (0.67 for cube/0.85 cylinder)
Cube Clause-[Link] P-49
Factor (λ) = 0.80 page-242
0.8 Up to fck ≤ 60Mpa,Eq.A2-33 (IRC:112-2011); 0.8-((fck-60)/500) for 60<fck<110Mpa
Factor (Ƞ) = 1.00 page-242
1.0 Up to fck ≤ 60Mpa,Eq.A2-35 (IRC:112-2011); 1.0-((fck-60)/250) for 60<fck<110Mpa
.
fcd = (a*fck/γm) = 11.17 Clause-[Link] P-48
Factor Fav (λȠfcd) = 8.93
Factor b = (Ƞ/2) = 0.40

DESIGN OF BEAM
For Combination I case 1 case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Ve = Vu + Tu*1.6/b Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn
Me = Mu + Tu/1.7*(1+D/b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Shear = KN 934.87 708.66 1138.43 1147.27 1135.47 1142.25 1131.10 1131.10
Torsion = KNm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moment = KNm 3642.80 2797.18 4323.54 4364.29 4311.47 4342.71 4295.79 4295.79
Design Eq Shear = KN 934.87 708.66 1138.43 1147.27 1135.47 1142.25 1131.10 1131.10
Design Eq Moment = KNm 3642.80 2797.18 4323.54 4364.29 4311.47 4342.71 4295.79 4295.79
Width of beam, B = mm 7500 7500 7500 7500 7500 7500 7500 7500
Depth of beam, D = mm 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
No of layers = 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Dia of Main. Bar = mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
cover to reinf. = mm 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75
Dia of Transverse bar = mm 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
deff provided = 1697 1697 1697 1697 1697 1697 1697 1697
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = (d*ecu3)/(es+ecu3)'mm'
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = mm 773.76 773.76 773.76 773.76 773.76 773.76 773.76 773.76
Minimum [Link] = (Cl. [Link]) mm2 17550 17550 17550 17550 17550 17550 17550 17550
Force in compression = Force in Tension from Fig. A2-4 - rectangular Tensile Strength
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reinf provided = mm2 28962 28962 28962 28962 28962 28962 28962 28962
Xu in mm = mm 187.9 187.9 187.9 187.9 187.9 187.9 187.9 187.9
IS Xu is less then the limiting Xulim Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Bar Spacing 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125
Ultimate moment of resistance= KNm 20415.682 20415.682 20415.682 20415.6816 20415.682 20415.682 20415.682 20415.6816
Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Check for Ultimate Shear Strength at Various Xn. (Vide Cl:10.3 of I.R.C:-112-2011)
MEd
VRd,c Design shear resistance of member without shear reinforcement
VRd,max Design maximum shear force that can be sustained by the member by crushing of compression struts
VRd,s Design shear force that can be sustained by yeilding of reinforcement
Pier _P2 Design of Footing Long

Vccd Design value of shear component of force in compression area in case of inclined compression chord
Vtd Design value of shear component of force in tensile reinforcement in case of inclined tensile chord
VRd Design shear resistance of member with shear reinforcement
VRd VRd.s + Vccd + Vtd
VEd Design shear force at C/s due to external applied loads + prestressing
VNs Net shear force in web at design section
VNs VEd -Vccd -Vtd -VPd (-ve for downward; +ve is upwards)
.
. case 1 case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn
VEd 934.87 708.66 1138.43 1147.27 1135.47 1142.25 1131.10 1131.10
VPd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
VNs 934.87 708.66 1138.43 1147.27 1135.47 1142.25 1131.10 1131.10
fck 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
fyk 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00
K 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41
d m 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17
bw m 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29
bwc m 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29
Asl mm2 28962 28962 28962 28962 28962 28962 28962 28962
Asc mm2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
S = (Ay)c m3 12.150 12.150 12.150 12.150 12.150 12.150 12.150 12.150
I m4 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645
Ϭcp MPA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
fywd MPA 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78
fcd MPA 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17
fctd = fctk/γm 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
acw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
v 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552
v1 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600
ρ1 0.0027 0.0027 0.0027 0.0027 0.0027 0.0027 0.0027 0.0027
Ɵ deg 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0
For Elements not requiring shear reinforcement as per Cl. 10.3.2
VRd,c [0.12*K(80*ρ1*fck)^0.33 + 0.15Ϭcp] bw d
VRd,c kN 3215.8 3215.8 3215.8 3215.8 3215.8 3215.8 3215.8 3215.8
VRd,c (min) kN 2827.7 2827.7 2827.7 2827.7 2827.7 2827.7 2827.7 2827.7
VRd,c kN 3216 3216 3216 3216 3216 3216 3216 3216
VEd, < 33429 33429 33429 33429 33429 33429 33429 33429
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
VEd, actual kN 935 709 1138 1147 1135 1142 1131 1131
Shear Reinforcement is Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd
. Nominal Shear reinforcement reqd for Foundn
VRd,s Asw*z*fywd*cotƟ / s Eq 10.7 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max acw*bw*z*v1*fcd/(cotƟ+tanƟ) Eq 10.8 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max kN 30086 30086 30086 30086 30086 30086 30086 30086
ρmin = . 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072
Asw min = mm2 836 836 836 836 836 836 836 836
Asw max = 0.5*acw*v1*fcd*bw*s/(fywd)
Asw max = mm2 8944 8944 8944 8944 8944 8944 8944 8944
Asw required = mm2 255 194 311 314 310 312 309 309
s = spacing of stirrups mm 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
No. of legs for stirrups Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
No. of links for stirrups Nos 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26
Asw provided mm2 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003
Shear reinft provided Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
VRd,s kN 7328 7328 7328 7328 7328 7328 7328 7328
OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY
Check for additional Longitudinal Steel for shear
ΔFtd 0.5 xVEd (cot (q) -cot (a)) a is angle of stirrups
ΔFtd 467.4 354.3 569.2 573.6 567.7 571.1 565.5 565.5
(Med - MR)/ z = 10985.3 11539.1 10539.4 10512.8 10547.3 10526.9 10557.6 10557.6
Additional Steel reqd = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

For Combination II case 1 case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Ve = Vu + Tu*1.6/b Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn
Me = Mu + Tu/1.7*(1+D/b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Shear = KN 652.97 463.85 836.07 843.73 833.54 839.43 829.05 829.05
Torsion = KNm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moment = KNm 2561.26 1853.95 3175.74 3211.05 3165.39 3192.55 3148.67 3148.67
Design Eq Shear = KN 652.97208 463.84612 836.07273 843.732102 833.53905 839.43087 829.04553 829.045532
Design Eq Moment = KNm 2561.26 1853.95 3175.74 3211.05 3165.39 3192.55 3148.67 3148.67
Width of beam, B = mm 7500 7500 7500 7500 7500 7500 7500 7500
Depth of beam, D = mm 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
No of layers = 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Dia of Main. Bar = mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
cover to reinf. = mm 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75
Dia of Transverse bar = mm 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
deff provided = 1696.5 1696.5 1696.5 1696.5 1696.5 1696.5 1696.5 1696.5
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = (d*ecu3)/(es+ecu3)'mm'
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = mm 773.75779 773.75779 773.75779 773.75779 773.75779 773.75779 773.75779 773.75779
Minimum [Link] = mm2 17550 17550 17550 17550 17550 17550 17550 17550
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59
Pier _P2 Design of Footing Long

Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reinf provided = mm2 28961.557 28961.557 28961.557 28961.5573 28961.557 28961.557 28961.557 28961.5573
Xu in mm = mm 187.94002 187.94002 187.94002 187.940021 187.94002 187.94002 187.94002 187.940021
IS Xu is less then the limiting Xulim Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Bar Spacing 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125
Ultimate moment of resistance= KNm 20415.682 20415.682 20415.682 20415.6816 20415.682 20415.682 20415.682 20415.6816
Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Check for Ultimate Shear Strength at Various Xn. (Vide Cl:10.3 of I.R.C:-112-2011)
MEd
VRd,c Design shear resistance of member without shear reinforcement
VRd,max Design maximum shear force that can be sustained by the member by crushing of compression struts
VRd,s Design shear force that can be sustained by yeilding of reinforcement
Vccd Design value of shear component of force in compression area in case of inclined compression chord
Vtd Design value of shear component of force in tensile reinforcement in case of inclined tensile chord
VRd Design shear resistance of member with shear reinforcement
VRd VRd.s + Vccd + Vtd
VEd Design shear force at C/s due to external applied loads + prestressing
VNs Net shear force in web at design section
VNs VEd -Vccd -Vtd -VPd (-ve for downward; +ve is upwards)
.
. case 1 case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn
VEd 652.97208 463.84612 836.07273 843.7321 833.539047 839.43087 829.04553 829.04553
VPd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
VNs 652.97208 463.84612 836.07273 843.7321 833.539047 839.43087 829.04553 829.04553
fck 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
fyk 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500
K 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41
d m 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17
bw m 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29
bwc m 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29
Asl mm2 28961.557 28961.557 28961.557 28961.557 28961.5573 28961.557 28961.557 28961.557
Asc mm2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
S = (Ay)c m3 12.15 12.15 12.15 12.15 12.15 12.15 12.15 12.15
I m4 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645
Ϭcp MPA 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
fywd MPA 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783
fcd MPA 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167
fctd = fctk/γm 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900
acw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
v 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552
v1 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600
ρ1 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003
Ɵ deg 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000
For Elements not requiring shear reinforcement as per Cl. 10.3.2
VRd,c [0.12*K(80*ρ1*fck)^0.33 + 0.15Ϭcp] bw d
VRd,c kN 3215.8285 3215.8285 3215.8285 3215.8285 3215.82854 3215.8285 3215.8285 3215.8285
VRd,c (min) kN 2827.7228 2827.7228 2827.7228 2827.7228 2827.7228 2827.7228 2827.7228 2827.7228
VRd,c kN 3215.8285 3215.8285 3215.8285 3215.8285 3215.82854 3215.8285 3215.8285 3215.8285
VEd, < 33428.752 33428.752 33428.752 33428.752 33428.7525 33428.752 33428.752 33428.752
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
VEd, actual kN 652.97208 463.84612 836.07273 843.7321 833.539047 839.43087 829.04553 829.04553
Shear Reinforcement is Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd
. Nominal Shear reinforcement reqd for Foundn
.
VRd,s Asw*z*fywd*cotƟ / s Eq 10.7 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max acw*bw*z*v1*fcd/(cotƟ+tanƟ) Eq 10.8 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max kN 30085.877 30085.877 30085.877 30085.877 30085.8772 30085.877 30085.877 30085.877
ρmin = . 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072
Asw min = mm2 835.74 835.74 835.74 835.74 835.74 835.74 835.74 835.74
Asw max = 0.5*acw*v1*fcd*bw*s/(fywd)
Asw max = mm2 8943.5788 8943.5788 8943.5788 8943.5788 8943.57875 8943.5788 8943.5788 8943.5788
Asw required = mm2 178.45406 126.76686 228.49457 230.58784 227.802126 229.41233 226.57407 226.57407
s = spacing of stirrups mm 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
No. of legs for stirrups Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
No. of links for stirrups Nos 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26
Asw provided mm2 2002.7653 2002.7653 2002.7653 2002.7653 2002.76532 2002.7653 2002.7653 2002.7653
Shear reinft provided Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
VRd,s kN 7328.2156 7328.2156 7328.2156 7328.2156 7328.21561 7328.2156 7328.2156 7328.2156
OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY
Check for additional Longitudinal Steel for shear
ΔFtd 0.5 xVEd (cot (q) -cot (a)) a is angle of stirrups
ΔFtd 326.48604 231.92306 418.03637 421.86605 416.769524 419.71544 414.52277 414.52277
(Med - MR)/ z = 11693.633 12156.882 11291.181 11268.054 11297.9595 11280.17 11308.913 11308.913
Additional Steel reqd = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

DESIGN OF BEAM AT SUPPORT

For Seismic combination case 1 case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Ve = Vu + Tu*1.6/b Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn
Me = Mu + Tu/1.7*(1+D/b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Shear = KN 1180.74 1140.42 1578.37 131.57 1573.72 123.69 1352.85 627.24
Torsion = KNm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moment = KNm 4508.62 4334.95 6355.04 505.53 6336.06 471.62 5318.25 2383.32
Pier _P2 Design of Footing Long

Design Eq Shear = KN 1180.7391 1140.4222 1578.3662 131.572664 1573.7211 123.68707 1352.8488 627.242624
Design Eq Moment = KNm 4508.62 4334.95 6355.04 505.53 6336.06 471.62 5318.25 2383.32
Width of beam, B = mm 7500 7500 7500 7500 7500 7500 7500 7500
Depth of beam, D = mm 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
No of layers = 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Dia of Main. Bar = mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
cover to reinf. = mm 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75
Dia of Transverse bar = mm 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
deff provided = 1696.5 1696.5 1696.5 1696.5 1696.5 1696.5 1696.5 1696.5
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = (d*ecu3)/(es+ecu3)'mm'
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = mm 773.75779 773.75779 773.75779 773.75779 773.75779 773.75779 773.75779 773.75779
Minimum [Link] = mm2 17550 17550 17550 17550 17550 17550 17550 17550
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reinf provided = mm2 28961.557 28961.557 28961.557 28961.5573 28961.557 28961.557 28961.557 28961.5573
Xu in mm = mm 187.94002 0.4383163 0.4383163 0.43831633 0.4383163 0.4383163 0.4383163 0.43831633
IS Xu is less then the limiting Xulim Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Bar Spacing 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125
Ultimate moment of resistance= KNm 20415.682 20415.682 20415.682 20415.6816 20415.682 20415.682 20415.682 20415.6816
Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

Check for Ultimate Shear Strength at Various Xn. (Vide Cl:10.3 of I.R.C:-112-2011)
MEd
VRd,c Design shear resistance of member without shear reinforcement
VRd,max Design maximum shear force that can be sustained by the member by crushing of compression struts
VRd,s Design shear force that can be sustained by yeilding of reinforcement
Vccd Design value of shear component of force in compression area in case of inclined compression chord
Vtd Design value of shear component of force in tensile reinforcement in case of inclined tensile chord
VRd Design shear resistance of member with shear reinforcement
VRd VRd.s + Vccd + Vtd
VEd Design shear force at C/s due to external applied loads + prestressing
VNs Net shear force in web at design section
VNs VEd -Vccd -Vtd -VPd (-ve for downward; +ve is upwards)
.
. case 1 case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn
VEd 1180.7391 1140.4222 1578.3662 131.57266 1573.72111 123.68707 1352.8488 627.24262
VPd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
VNs 1180.7391 1140.4222 1578.3662 131.57266 1573.72111 123.68707 1352.8488 627.24262
fck 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
fyk 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500
K 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41
d m 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17
bw m 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29
bwc m 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29
Asl mm2 28961.557 28961.557 28961.557 28961.557 28961.5573 28961.557 28961.557 28961.557
Asc mm2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
S = (Ay)c m3 12.15 12.15 12.15 12.15 12.15 12.15 12.15 12.15
I m4 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645
Ϭcp MPA 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
fywd MPA 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783
fcd MPA 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167
fctd = fctk/γm 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900
acw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
v 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552
v1 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600
ρ1 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003
Ɵ deg 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000
For Elements not requiring shear reinforcement as per Cl. 10.3.2
VRd,c [0.12*K(80*ρ1*fck)^0.33 + 0.15Ϭcp] bw d
VRd,c kN 3215.8285 3215.8285 3215.8285 3215.8285 3215.82854 3215.8285 3215.8285 3215.8285
VRd,c (min) kN 2827.7228 2827.7228 2827.7228 2827.7228 2827.7228 2827.7228 2827.7228 2827.7228
VRd,c kN 3215.8285 3215.8285 3215.8285 3215.8285 3215.82854 3215.8285 3215.8285 3215.8285
VEd, < 33428.752 33428.752 33428.752 33428.752 33428.7525 33428.752 33428.752 33428.752
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
VEd, actual kN 1180.7391 1140.4222 1578.3662 131.57266 1573.72111 123.68707 1352.8488 627.24262
Shear Reinforcement is Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd
. Nominal Shear reinforcement reqd for Foundn
VRd,s Asw*z*fywd*cotƟ / s Eq 10.7 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max acw*bw*z*v1*fcd/(cotƟ+tanƟ) Eq 10.8 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max kN 30085.877 30085.877 30085.877 30085.877 30085.8772 30085.877 30085.877 30085.877
ρmin = . 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072
Asw min = mm2 835.74 835.74 835.74 835.74 835.74 835.74 835.74 835.74
Asw max = 0.5*acw*v1*fcd*bw*s/(fywd)
Asw max = mm2 8943.5788 8943.5788 8943.5788 8943.5788 8943.57875 8943.5788 8943.5788 8943.5788
Asw required = mm2 322.69019 311.67177 431.35973 35.958163 430.090247 33.803069 369.72694 171.42233
s = spacing of stirrups mm 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
No. of legs for stirrups Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
No. of links for stirrups Nos 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26
Asw provided mm2 2002.7653 2002.7653 2002.7653 2002.7653 2002.76532 2002.7653 2002.7653 2002.7653
Shear reinft provided Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
VRd,s kN 7328.2156 7328.2156 7328.2156 7328.2156 7328.21561 7328.2156 7328.2156 7328.2156
OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY
Pier _P2 Design of Footing Long

Check for additional Longitudinal Steel for shear

ΔFtd 0.5 xVEd (cot (q) -cot (a)) a is angle of stirrups
ΔFtd 590.36954 570.21108 789.1831 65.786332 786.860557 61.843536 676.42441 313.62131
(Med - MR)/ z = 10418.223 10531.968 9208.9238 13040.015 9221.3517 13062.227 9887.9579 11810.175
Additional Steel reqd = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

For Accidental Combination case 1 case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Ve = Vu + Tu*1.6/b Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn
Me = Mu + Tu/1.7*(1+D/b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Shear = KN 880.07 839.75 1128.94 165.89 1124.30 158.00 973.85 490.11
Torsion = KNm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moment = KNm 3367.72 3194.04 4528.35 635.47 4509.37 601.55 3816.68 1860.06
Design Eq Shear = KN 880.07104 839.75413 1128.9413 165.885259 1124.2962 157.99967 973.85027 490.112805
Design Eq Moment = KNm 3367.72 3194.04 4528.35 635.47 4509.37 601.55 3816.68 1860.06
Width of beam, B = mm 7500 7500 7500 7500 7500 7500 7500 7500
Depth of beam, D = mm 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
No of layers = 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Dia of Main. Bar = mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
cover to reinf. = mm 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75
Dia of Transverse bar = mm 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
deff provided = 1697 1697 1697 1697 1697 1697 1697 1697
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = (d*ecu3)/(es+ecu3)'mm'
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = mm 773.76 773.76 773.76 773.76 773.76 773.76 773.76 773.76
Minimum [Link] = mm2 17550 17550 17550 17550 17550 17550 17550 17550
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 59 59 59 59 59 59 59 59
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reinf provided = mm2 28962 28962 28962 28962 28962 28962 28962 28962
Xu in mm = mm 187.9 187.9 187.9 187.9 187.9 187.9 187.9 187.9
IS Xu is less then the limiting Xulim Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Bar Spacing 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125
Ultimate moment of resistance= KNm 20415.682 20415.682 20415.682 20415.6816 20415.682 20415.682 20415.682 20415.6816
Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Check for Ultimate Shear Strength at Various Xn. (Vide Cl:10.3 of I.R.C:-112-2011)
MEd
VRd,c Design shear resistance of member without shear reinforcement
VRd,max Design maximum shear force that can be sustained by the member by crushing of compression struts
VRd,s Design shear force that can be sustained by yeilding of reinforcement
Vccd Design value of shear component of force in compression area in case of inclined compression chord
Vtd Design value of shear component of force in tensile reinforcement in case of inclined tensile chord
VRd Design shear resistance of member with shear reinforcement
VRd VRd.s + Vccd + Vtd
VEd Design shear force at C/s due to external applied loads + prestressing
VNs Net shear force in web at design section
VNs VEd -Vccd -Vtd -VPd (-ve for downward; +ve is upwards)
. case 1 case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn
VEd 880.07 839.75 1128.94 165.89 1124.30 158.00 973.85 490.11
VPd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
VNs 880.07 839.75 1128.94 165.89 1124.30 158.00 973.85 490.11
fck 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
fyk 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00
K 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41
d m 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17
bw m 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29
bwc m 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29
Asl mm2 28962 28962 28962 28962 28962 28962 28962 28962
Pier _P2 Design of Footing Long

Asc mm2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
S = (Ay)c m3 12.150 12.150 12.150 12.150 12.150 12.150 12.150 12.150
I m4 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645 3.645
Ϭcp MPA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
fywd MPA 434.8 434.8 434.8 434.8 434.8 434.8 434.8 434.8
fcd MPA 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17
fctd = fctk/γm 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
acw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
v 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552
v1 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600
ρ1 0.0027 0.0027 0.0027 0.0027 0.0027 0.0027 0.0027 0.0027
Ɵ deg 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0
For Elements not requiring shear reinforcement as per Cl. 10.3.2
VRd,c [0.12*K(80*ρ1*fck)^0.33 + 0.15Ϭcp] bw d
VRd,c kN 3215.8 3215.8 3215.8 3215.8 3215.8 3215.8 3215.8 3215.8
VRd,c (min) kN 2827.7 2827.7 2827.7 2827.7 2827.7 2827.7 2827.7 2827.7
VRd,c I*bwc / s * sqrt [ (fctd)^2+k1.Ϭ[Link]] (for PSC members)
VRd,c kN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
VRd,c kN 3216 3216 3216 3216 3216 3216 3216 3216
VEd, < 33429 33429 33429 33429 33429 33429 33429 33429
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
VEd, actual kN 880 840 1129 166 1124 158 974 490
Shear Reinforcement is Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd
. Nominal Shear reinforcement reqd for Foundn
VRd,s Asw*z*fywd*cotƟ / s Eq 10.7 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max acw*bw*z*v1*fcd/(cotƟ+tanƟ) Eq 10.8 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max kN 30086 30086 30086 30086 30086 30086 30086 30086
ρmin = . 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072
Asw min = mm2 836 836 836 836 836 836 836 836
Asw max = 0.5*acw*v1*fcd*bw*s/(fywd)
Asw max = mm2 8944 8944 8944 8944 8944 8944 8944 8944
Asw required = mm2 241 230 309 45 307 43 266 134
s = spacing of stirrups mm 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
No. of legs for stirrups Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
No. of links for stirrups Nos 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26
Asw provided mm2 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2003
Shear reinft provided Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
VRd,s kN 7328 7328 7328 7328 7328 7328 7328 7328
OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY
Check for additional Longitudinal Steel for shear
ΔFtd 0.5 xVEd (cot (q) -cot (a)) a is angle of stirrups
ΔFtd 440.0 419.9 564.5 82.9 562.1 79.0 486.9 245.1
(Med - MR)/ z = 11165.4 11279.2 10405.3 12954.9 10417.7 12977.1 10871.4 12152.9
Additional Steel reqd = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
15.1 Minimum Distribution Steel at Bottom
Minimum Steel Requirement = 5792 mm2
Provide 12 mm Dia @ 125 mm
Provided Steel = 6786 OK
15.2 Check for Maximum Reinforcement (As per Clause [Link] )
Area of tensile steel As = 28961.56 mm2 OK
Area of compression steel As' = 6785.84 mm2
0.025Ac= 337500 mm2
0.04Ac= 540000 mm2
Total provided Steel in tension and compression = 35747 mm2 OK
15.3 Check for Minimum Reinforcement (As per Clause [Link] )
1. As,min = 0.26fctm/fyk btd = 17760.60 mm2
2. As,min =0.0013 btd = 17550.00 mm2
Ast required max of case 1 & 2 = 17760.60 mm2 OK
15.4 Longitudinal Steel at Top
Minimum Steel Requirement = 5792 mm2
Provide 16 mm Dia @ 125 mm
Provided Steel = 12064 OK
15.5 Minimum Distribution Steel at Top = 250.0 mm2/m
(as per Cl. 707.2.8 of IRC:78-2014)
Provide 16 mm Dia @ 804.2 mm
Hence Provide 16 mm Dia @ 125 mm c/c OK
Pier _P2 CW-FDN Long

16.0 Crack Width Check for foundation raft

Longitudinal Transverse
Design Moment = 3130.89 kNm for whole width of footing 851.6 kNm for whole width of footing
Design Shear = 825.09 kN for whole width of footing 2456.7 kN for whole width of footing
Design Punching shear= 0.00 kN

Concrete Grade fck = 25

Concrete Modulus Ec = 30000 N/mm2
Steel Modulus Es = 200 KN/mm2
Service Stage Moment = 3130.89 KNm
Allowable crackwidth wadm = 0.3 mm
Section depth d = 1800 mm
Section width bt = 7500.00 mm
Minimum cover cmin = 50 mm
Bar spacing s = 125 mm
Bar diameter f = 25 mm
Effective depth h = 1737.5 mm
Area of tensile steel As = 28961.6 mm2
Area of compressive steel As' = 6785.8 mm2
M under Serviceability Limit State(SLS)= 3130.89 KN-m

Check for Cracking

Depth to neutral axis,y = 900 mm
4
Second Moment of Inertia, I = 3.645E+12 mm
If the section is uncracked, compressive and tensile stress at the top and bottom of the section respectivley
would be σtop =σbottom = M*y/I = 0.77 Mpa
From Table 6.5, fctm corresponding to M 25 = 2.2 Mpa
Since, 2.2 > 0.77
Therefore the section is uncracked.
Pier _P2 Design of Footing Trans

17.0 Design of Foundation

ALL DISTANCES ARE IN M, STRESSES IN MPA, FORCES IN KN AND MOMENTS IN KNM
ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE CHECK FOR MOMENT, SHEAR AND TORSION AS PER IRC:112-2011
Table 6.5 of IRC-112-2011
Density Concrete (kn/cu.m) 25 Beam fck 25 Mpa Ec 30000 Mpa
Pier fck 25 Mpa Ec 30000 Mpa
Sectional Properties
Load Case case 1 case 2 case 3 case 4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Section at Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn
LC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
No. of webs 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Width of TOP beam, B (mm) 6500 6500 6500 6500 6500 6500 6500 6500
Depth of top beam, D (mm) 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
Area of Sec I 11.700 11.700 11.700 11.700 11.700 11.700 11.700 11.700
Moment of Inertia (I) m4 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159
C.G. of section frm top 900.000 900.000 900.000 900.000 900.000 900.000 900.000 900.000
C.G. of Sec I from top 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900
Moment of Inertia of combined
section (I) m4 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159
Area of Girder m2 11.70 11.70 11.70 11.70 11.70 11.70 11.70 11.70
Perimeter of Girder m 16.60 16.60 16.60 16.60 16.60 16.60 16.60 16.60
Moment of Inertia m4 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159
depth of section m 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800 1.800
CG of Section (bot) m 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900 0.900
Z bot of section m4 3.510 3.510 3.510 3.510 3.510 3.510 3.510 3.510
Z top of section m4 3.510 3.510 3.510 3.510 3.510 3.510 3.510 3.510
Width of Web m 6.500 6.500 6.500 6.500 6.500 6.500 6.500 6.500
Grade of concrete =M 25 MPa
Grade of steel = Fe500
(fck) = 25.00
(fywk) = 500.00 (fywk)/γ 434.782609 N/mm2
Ten. strength of conc (fctm) = 2.20 N/mm2 Table-6.5, p-38,IRC-112
Design yld of shear reinf fywd = 0.8*fyk/γs = 347.83 N/mm2 Clause-[Link] P-91
[Link]. factor for conc (γm) = 1.50 MPa Clause-[Link] P-49
Part. mat factor for Steel (γs) = 1.15 MPa Clause-6.2.2 P-30
Ult. comp strain in the conc (єcu3) = 0.0035 Basic Table-6.5, p-38,IRC-112
[Link] of reinforcing of steel (Es) = 200000 Basic Clause-6.2.2 P-29
[Link] of concrete (Ecm) = 30000 Table-6.5, p-38,IRC-112
modular ratio αe (Es/Ecm) = 6.67 N/mm2
[Link] strain in the steel (єs) = [{fywk/(γs xEs)}+0.002] = 0.0042 MPa IS 456 clause 38.1
[Link] influence of the concrete strength (a) = 0.67 (0.67 for cube/0.85 cylinder)
Cube Clause-[Link] P-49
Factor (λ) = 0.80 page-242
0.8 Up to fck ≤ 60Mpa,Eq.A2-33 (IRC:112-2011); 0.8-((fck-60)/500) for 60<fck<110Mpa
Factor (Ƞ) = 1.00 page-242
1.0 Up to fck ≤ 60Mpa,Eq.A2-35 (IRC:112-2011); 1.0-((fck-60)/250) for 60<fck<110Mpa
.
fcd = (a*fck/γm) = 11.17 Clause-[Link] P-48
Factor Fav (λȠfcd) = 8.93
Factor b = (Ƞ/2) = 0.40

DESIGN OF BEAM
For Combination I case 1 case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Ve = Vu + Tu*1.6/b Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn
Me = Mu + Tu/1.7*(1+D/b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Shear = KN 4654.93 4590.75 3513.54 3556.81 3475.82 3509.00 3387.0 3386.97
Torsion = KNm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0
Moment = KNm 1423.38 1334.19 1204.71 1219.71 1194.74 1206.24 1173.0 1172.95
Design Eq Shear = KN 4654.93 4590.75 3513.54 3556.81 3475.82 3509.00 3387.0 3386.97
Design Eq Moment = KNm 1423.38 1334.19 1204.71 1219.71 1194.74 1206.24 1172.95 1172.95
Width of beam, B = mm 6500 6500 6500 6500 6500 6500 6500 6500
Depth of beam, D = mm 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
No of layers = 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Dia of Main. Bar = mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
cover to reinf. = mm 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75
Dia of Transverse bar = mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
deff provided = 1688 1688 1688 1688 1688 1688 1688 1688
Pier _P2 Design of Footing Trans

Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = (d*ecu3)/(es+ecu3)'mm'

Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = mm 769.65 769.65 769.65 769.65 769.65 769.65 769.65 769.65
Minimum [Link] = (Cl. [Link]) mm2 15210 15210 15210 15210 15210 15210 15210 15210
Force in compression = Force in Tension from Fig. A2-4 - rectangular Tensile Strength
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reinf provided = mm2 25035 25035 25035 25035 25035 25035 25035 25035
Xu in mm = mm 187.4 187.4 187.4 187.4 187.4 187.4 187.4 187.4
IS Xu is less then the limiting Xulim Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Bar Spacing 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125
Ultimate moment of resistance= KNm 17551.626 17551.626 17551.6259 17551.6259 17551.6259 17551.626 17551.626 17551.626
Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Check for Ultimate Shear Strength at Various Xn. (Vide Cl:10.3 of I.R.C:-112-2011)
MEd
VRd,c Design shear resistance of member without shear reinforcement
VRd,max Design maximum shear force that can be sustained by the member by crushing of compression struts
VRd,s Design shear force that can be sustained by yeilding of reinforcement
Vccd Design value of shear component of force in compression area in case of inclined compression chord
Vtd Design value of shear component of force in tensile reinforcement in case of inclined tensile chord
VRd Design shear resistance of member with shear reinforcement
VRd VRd.s + Vccd + Vtd
VEd Design shear force at C/s due to external applied loads + prestressing
VNs Net shear force in web at design section
VNs VEd -Vccd -Vtd -VPd (-ve for downward; +ve is upwards)
.
. case 1 case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn
VEd 4654.93 4590.75 3513.54 3556.81 3475.82 3509.00 3386.97 3386.97
VPd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
VNs 4654.93 4590.75 3513.54 3556.81 3475.82 3509.00 3386.97 3386.97
fck 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
fyk 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00
K 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41
d m 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17
bw m 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29
bwc m 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29
Asl mm2 25035 25035 25035 25035 25035 25035 25035 25035
Asc mm2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
S = (Ay)c m3 10.530 10.530 10.530 10.530 10.530 10.530 10.530 10.530
I m4 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159
Ϭcp MPA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
fywd MPA 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78
fcd MPA 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17
fctd = fctk/γm 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
acw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
v 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552
v1 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600
ρ1 0.0026 0.0026 0.0026 0.0026 0.0026 0.0026 0.0026 0.0026
Ɵ deg 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0
For Elements not requiring shear reinforcement as per Cl. 10.3.2
VRd,c [0.12*K(80*ρ1*fck)^0.33 + 0.15Ϭcp] bw d
VRd,c kN 2839.3 2839.3 2839.3 2839.3 2839.3 2839.3 2839.3 2839.3
VRd,c (min) kN 2523.2 2523.2 2523.2 2523.2 2523.2 2523.2 2523.2 2523.2
VRd,c kN 2839 2839 2839 2839 2839 2839 2839 2839
VEd, < 29829 29829 29829 29829 29829 29829 29829 29829
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
VEd, actual kN 4655 4591 3514 3557 3476 3509 3387 3387
Shear Reinforcement is Reqd Reqd Reqd Reqd Reqd Reqd Reqd Reqd
. Nominal Shear reinforcement reqd for Foundn
VRd,s Asw*z*fywd*cotƟ / s Eq 10.7 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max acw*bw*z*v1*fcd/(cotƟ+tanƟ) Eq 10.8 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max kN 26846 26846 26846 26846 26846 26846 26846 26846
ρmin = . 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072
Asw min = mm2 746 746 746 746 746 746 746 746
Asw max = 0.5*acw*v1*fcd*bw*s/(fywd)
Pier _P2 Design of Footing Trans

Asw max = mm2 7980 7980 7980 7980 7980 7980 7980 7980
Asw required = mm2 1272 1255 960 972 950 959 926 926
s = spacing of stirrups mm 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
No. of legs for stirrups Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
No. of links for stirrups Nos 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Asw provided mm2 2317 2317 2317 2317 2317 2317 2317 2317
Shear reinft provided Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
VRd,s kN 8478 8478 8478 8478 8478 8478 8478 8478
OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY
Check for additional Longitudinal Steel for shear
ΔFtd 0.5 xVEd (cot (q) -cot (a)) a is angle of stirrups
ΔFtd 2327.5 2295.4 1756.8 1778.4 1737.9 1754.5 1693.5 1693.5
(Med - MR)/ z = 10619.4 10678.1 10763.4 10753.5 10770.0 10762.4 10784.3 10784.3
Additional Steel reqd = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

For Combination II case 1 case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Ve = Vu + Tu*1.6/b Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn
Me = Mu + Tu/1.7*(1+D/b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Shear = KN 3591.91 3532.67 2596.78 2634.29 2564.45 2593.30 2482.67 2482.67
Torsion = KNm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moment = KNm 1077.50 1001.54 888.67 901.67 880.13 890.13 859.77 859.77
Design Eq Shear = KN 3591.9131 3532.667 2596.78438 2634.28761 2564.45217 2593.3008 2482.6713 2482.6713
Design Eq Moment = KNm 1077.50 1001.54 888.67 901.67 880.13 890.13 859.77 859.77
Width of beam, B = mm 6500 6500 6500 6500 6500 6500 6500 6500
Depth of beam, D = mm 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
No of layers = 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Dia of Main. Bar = mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
cover to reinf. = mm 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75
Dia of Transverse bar = mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
deff provided = 1687.5 1687.5 1687.5 1687.5 1687.5 1687.5 1687.5 1687.5
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = (d*ecu3)/(es+ecu3)'mm'
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = mm 1365.2913 769.65297 769.652975 769.652975 769.652975 769.65297 769.65297 769.65297
Minimum [Link] = mm2 15210 15210 15210 15210 15210 15210 15210 15210
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reinf provided = mm2 25034.566 25034.566 25034.5665 25034.5665 25034.5665 25034.566 25034.566 25034.566
Xu in mm = mm 187.44996 187.44996 187.449956 187.449956 187.449956 187.44996 187.44996 187.44996
IS Xu is less then the limiting Xulim Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Bar Spacing 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125
Ultimate moment of resistance= KNm 17551.626 17551.626 17551.6259 17551.6259 17551.6259 17551.626 17551.626 17551.626
Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Check for Ultimate Shear Strength at Various Xn. (Vide Cl:10.3 of I.R.C:-112-2011)
MEd
VRd,c Design shear resistance of member without shear reinforcement
VRd,max Design maximum shear force that can be sustained by the member by crushing of compression struts
VRd,s Design shear force that can be sustained by yeilding of reinforcement
Vccd Design value of shear component of force in compression area in case of inclined compression chord
Vtd Design value of shear component of force in tensile reinforcement in case of inclined tensile chord
VRd Design shear resistance of member with shear reinforcement
VRd VRd.s + Vccd + Vtd
VEd Design shear force at C/s due to external applied loads + prestressing
VNs Net shear force in web at design section
VNs VEd -Vccd -Vtd -VPd (-ve for downward; +ve is upwards)
.
Pier _P2 Design of Footing Trans

. case 1 case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8

Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn
VEd 3591.91308 3532.667 2596.7844 2634.28761 2564.45217 2593.30081 2482.6713 2482.6713
VPd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
VNs 3591.91308 3532.667 2596.7844 2634.28761 2564.45217 2593.30081 2482.6713 2482.6713
fck 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
fyk 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500
K 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41
d m 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17
bw m 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29
bwc m 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29
Asl mm2 25034.5665 25034.566 25034.566 25034.5665 25034.5665 25034.5665 25034.566 25034.566
Asc mm2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
S = (Ay)c m3 10.53 10.53 10.53 10.53 10.53 10.53 10.53 10.53
I m4 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159
Ϭcp MPA 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
fywd MPA 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783
fcd MPA 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167
fctd = fctk/γm 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900
acw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
v 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552
v1 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600
ρ1 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003
Ɵ deg 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000
For Elements not requiring shear reinforcement as per Cl. 10.3.2
VRd,c [0.12*K(80*ρ1*fck)^0.33 + 0.15Ϭcp] bw d
VRd,c kN 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202
VRd,c (min) kN 2523.20817 2523.2082 2523.2082 2523.20817 2523.20817 2523.20817 2523.2082 2523.2082
VRd,c kN 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202
VEd, < 29828.8437 29828.844 29828.844 29828.8437 29828.8437 29828.8437 29828.844 29828.844
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
VEd, actual kN 3591.91308 3532.667 2596.7844 2634.28761 2564.45217 2593.30081 2482.6713 2482.6713
Shear Reinforcement is Reqd Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd
. Nominal Shear reinforcement reqd for Foundn
.
VRd,s Asw*z*fywd*cotƟ / s Eq 10.7 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max acw*bw*z*v1*fcd/(cotƟ+tanƟ) Eq 10.8 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max kN 26845.9594 26845.959 26845.959 26845.9594 26845.9594 26845.9594 26845.959 26845.959
ρmin = . 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072
Asw min = mm2 745.74 745.74 745.74 745.74 745.74 745.74 745.74 745.74
Asw max = 0.5*acw*v1*fcd*bw*s/(fywd)
Asw max = mm2 7980.45375 7980.4538 7980.4538 7980.45375 7980.45375 7980.45375 7980.4538 7980.4538
Asw required = mm2 981.652193 965.46055 709.68841 719.937859 700.852177 708.736368 678.50185 678.50185
s = spacing of stirrups mm 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
No. of legs for stirrups Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
No. of links for stirrups Nos 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Asw provided mm2 2316.92458 2316.9246 2316.9246 2316.92458 2316.92458 2316.92458 2316.9246 2316.9246
Shear reinft provided Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
VRd,s kN 8477.73963 8477.7396 8477.7396 8477.73963 8477.73963 8477.73963 8477.7396 8477.7396
OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY
Check for additional Longitudinal Steel for shear
ΔFtd 0.5 xVEd (cot (q) -cot (a)) a is angle of stirrups
ΔFtd 1795.95654 1766.3335 1298.3922 1317.1438 1282.22609 1296.6504 1241.3356 1241.3356
(Med - MR)/ z = 10847.1638 10897.173 10971.491 10962.931 10977.1172 10970.5323 10990.522 10990.522
Additional Steel reqd = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pier _P2 Design of Footing Trans

DESIGN OF BEAM AT SUPPORT

For Seismic combination case 1 case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Ve = Vu + Tu*1.6/b Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn
Me = Mu + Tu/1.7*(1+D/b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Shear = KN 3870.15 3490.09 5617.82 3454.35 5558.55 3379.20 4470.43 3377.87
Torsion = KNm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moment = KNm 1308.35 1201.02 1940.85 845.31 1925.19 824.15 1548.86 997.34
Design Eq Shear = KN 3870.1507 3490.0857 5617.8234 3454.34724 5558.54768 3379.2048 4470.4297 3377.8734
Design Eq Moment = KNm 1308.35 1201.02 1940.85 845.31 1925.19 824.15 1548.86 997.34
Width of beam, B = mm 6500 6500 6500 6500 6500 6500 6500 6500
Depth of beam, D = mm 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
No of layers = 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Dia of Main. Bar = mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
cover to reinf. = mm 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75
Dia of Transverse bar = mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
deff provided = 1687.5 1687.5 1687.5 1687.5 1687.5 1687.5 1687.5 1687.5
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = (d*ecu3)/(es+ecu3)'mm'
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = mm 1365.2913 769.65297 769.652975 769.652975 769.652975 769.65297 769.65297 769.65297
Minimum [Link] = mm2 15210 15210 15210 15210 15210 15210 15210 15210
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reinf provided = mm2 25034.566 25034.566 25034.5665 25034.5665 25034.5665 25034.566 25034.566 25034.566
Xu in mm = mm 187.44996 0.4291255 0.4291255 0.4291255 0.4291255 0.4291255 0.4291255 0.4291255
IS Xu is less then the limiting Xulim Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Bar Spacing 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125
Ultimate moment of resistance= KNm 17551.626 17551.626 17551.6259 17551.6259 17551.6259 17551.626 17551.626 17551.626
Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

Check for Ultimate Shear Strength at Various Xn. (Vide Cl:10.3 of I.R.C:-112-2011)
MEd
VRd,c Design shear resistance of member without shear reinforcement
VRd,max Design maximum shear force that can be sustained by the member by crushing of compression struts
VRd,s Design shear force that can be sustained by yeilding of reinforcement
Vccd Design value of shear component of force in compression area in case of inclined compression chord
Vtd Design value of shear component of force in tensile reinforcement in case of inclined tensile chord
VRd Design shear resistance of member with shear reinforcement
VRd VRd.s + Vccd + Vtd
VEd Design shear force at C/s due to external applied loads + prestressing
VNs Net shear force in web at design section
VNs VEd -Vccd -Vtd -VPd (-ve for downward; +ve is upwards)
.
. case 1 case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn
VEd 3870.15071 3490.0857 5617.8234 3454.34724 5558.54768 3379.20477 4470.4297 3377.8734
VPd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
VNs 3870.15071 3490.0857 5617.8234 3454.34724 5558.54768 3379.20477 4470.4297 3377.8734
fck 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
fyk 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500
K 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41
d m 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17
bw m 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29
bwc m 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29
Asl mm2 25034.5665 25034.566 25034.566 25034.5665 25034.5665 25034.5665 25034.566 25034.566
Asc mm2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
S = (Ay)c m3 10.53 10.53 10.53 10.53 10.53 10.53 10.53 10.53
I m4 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159
Ϭcp MPA 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
fywd MPA 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783
fcd MPA 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167
fctd = fctk/γm 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900
acw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
v 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552
v1 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600
ρ1 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003
Ɵ deg 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000
For Elements not requiring shear reinforcement as per Cl. 10.3.2
VRd,c [0.12*K(80*ρ1*fck)^0.33 + 0.15Ϭcp] bw d
VRd,c kN 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202
VRd,c (min) kN 2523.20817 2523.2082 2523.2082 2523.20817 2523.20817 2523.20817 2523.2082 2523.2082
VRd,c kN 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202 2839.3202
VEd, < 29828.8437 29828.844 29828.844 29828.8437 29828.8437 29828.8437 29828.844 29828.844
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
VEd, actual kN 3870.15071 3490.0857 5617.8234 3454.34724 5558.54768 3379.20477 4470.4297 3377.8734
Shear Reinforcement is Reqd Reqd Reqd Reqd Reqd Reqd Reqd Reqd
. Nominal Shear reinforcement reqd for Foundn
VRd,s Asw*z*fywd*cotƟ / s Eq 10.7 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max acw*bw*z*v1*fcd/(cotƟ+tanƟ) Eq 10.8 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max kN 26845.9594 26845.959 26845.959 26845.9594 26845.9594 26845.9594 26845.959 26845.959
ρmin = . 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072
Asw min = mm2 745.74 745.74 745.74 745.74 745.74 745.74 745.74 745.74
Asw max = 0.5*acw*v1*fcd*bw*s/(fywd)
Asw max = mm2 7980.45375 7980.4538 7980.4538 7980.45375 7980.45375 7980.45375 7980.4538 7980.4538
Pier _P2 Design of Footing Trans

Asw required = mm2 1057.69317 953.82327 1535.3235 944.056126 1519.12377 923.520059 1221.7465 923.15619
s = spacing of stirrups mm 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
No. of legs for stirrups Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
No. of links for stirrups Nos 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Asw provided mm2 2316.92458 2316.9246 2316.9246 2316.92458 2316.92458 2316.92458 2316.9246 2316.9246
Shear reinft provided Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
VRd,s kN 8477.73963 8477.7396 8477.7396 8477.73963 8477.73963 8477.73963 8477.7396 8477.7396
OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY
Check for additional Longitudinal Steel for shear
ΔFtd 0.5 xVEd (cot (q) -cot (a)) a is angle of stirrups
ΔFtd 1935.07535 1745.0428 2808.9117 1727.17362 2779.27384 1689.60239 2235.2148 1688.9367
(Med - MR)/ z = 10695.1621 10765.834 10278.699 11000.0421 10289.0133 11013.9778 10536.8 10899.941
Additional Steel reqd = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

For Accidental Combination VEd case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Ve = Vu + Tu*1.6/b Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn
Me = Mu + Tu/1.7*(1+D/b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Shear = KN 2974.95 2594.88 3994.25 2559.15 3934.97 2484.00 3185.05 2456.68
Torsion = KNm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moment = KNm 998.01 890.68 1378.01 650.15 1362.35 628.99 1104.15 736.47
Design Eq Shear = KN 2974.9486 2594.8836 3994.25042 2559.14514 3934.9747 2484.0027 3185.049 2456.6781
Design Eq Moment = KNm 998.01 890.68 1378.01 650.15 1362.35 628.99 1104.15 736.47
Width of beam, B = mm 6500 6500 6500 6500 6500 6500 6500 6500
Depth of beam, D = mm 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
No of layers = 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Dia of Main. Bar = mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
cover to reinf. = mm 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75
Dia of Transverse bar = mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
deff provided = 1688 1688 1688 1688 1688 1688 1688 1688
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = (d*ecu3)/(es+ecu3)'mm'
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = mm 1676.58 769.65 769.65 769.65 769.65 769.65 769.65 769.65
Minimum [Link] = mm2 15210 15210 15210 15210 15210 15210 15210 15210
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reinf provided = mm2 25035 25035 25035 25035 25035 25035 25035 25035
Xu in mm = mm 187.4 187.4 187.4 187.4 187.4 187.4 187.4 187.4
IS Xu is less then the limiting Xulim Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Bar Spacing 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125
Ultimate moment of resistance= KNm 17551.626 17551.626 17551.6259 17551.6259 17551.6259 17551.626 17551.626 17551.626
Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Pier _P2 Design of Footing Trans

Check for Ultimate Shear Strength at Various Xn. (Vide Cl:10.3 of I.R.C:-112-2011)
MEd
VRd,c Design shear resistance of member without shear reinforcement
VRd,max Design maximum shear force that can be sustained by the member by crushing of compression struts
VRd,s Design shear force that can be sustained by yeilding of reinforcement
Vccd Design value of shear component of force in compression area in case of inclined compression chord
Vtd Design value of shear component of force in tensile reinforcement in case of inclined tensile chord
VRd Design shear resistance of member with shear reinforcement
VRd VRd.s + Vccd + Vtd
VEd Design shear force at C/s due to external applied loads + prestressing
VNs Net shear force in web at design section
VNs VEd -Vccd -Vtd -VPd (-ve for downward; +ve is upwards)
.
. VEd case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn Foundn
VEd 2974.95 2594.88 3994.25 2559.15 3934.97 2484.00 3185.05 2456.68
VPd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
VNs 2974.95 2594.88 3994.25 2559.15 3934.97 2484.00 3185.05 2456.68
fck 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
fyk 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00
K 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41 1.41
d m 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17
bw m 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29
bwc m 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29 8.29
Asl mm2 25035 25035 25035 25035 25035 25035 25035 25035
Asc mm2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
S = (Ay)c m3 10.530 10.530 10.530 10.530 10.530 10.530 10.530 10.530
I m4 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159 3.159
Ϭcp MPA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
fywd MPA 434.8 434.8 434.8 434.8 434.8 434.8 434.8 434.8
fcd MPA 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17
fctd = fctk/γm 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
acw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
v 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552
v1 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600
ρ1 0.0026 0.0026 0.0026 0.0026 0.0026 0.0026 0.0026 0.0026
Ɵ deg 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0
For Elements not requiring shear reinforcement as per Cl. 10.3.2
VRd,c [0.12*K(80*ρ1*fck)^0.33 + 0.15Ϭcp] bw d
VRd,c kN 2839.3 2839.3 2839.3 2839.3 2839.3 2839.3 2839.3 2839.3
VRd,c (min) kN 2523.2 2523.2 2523.2 2523.2 2523.2 2523.2 2523.2 2523.2
VRd,c I*bwc / s * sqrt [ (fctd)^2+k1.Ϭ[Link]] (for PSC members)
VRd,c kN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
VRd,c kN 2839 2839 2839 2839 2839 2839 2839 2839
VEd, < 29829 29829 29829 29829 29829 29829 29829 29829
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
VEd, actual kN 2975 2595 3994 2559 3935 2484 3185 2457
Shear Reinforcement is Reqd Not Reqd Reqd Not Reqd Reqd Not Reqd Reqd Not Reqd
. Nominal Shear reinforcement reqd for Foundn
VRd,s Asw*z*fywd*cotƟ / s Eq 10.7 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max acw*bw*z*v1*fcd/(cotƟ+tanƟ) Eq 10.8 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max kN 26846 26846 26846 26846 26846 26846 26846 26846
ρmin = . 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072
Asw min = mm2 746 746 746 746 746 746 746 746
Asw max = 0.5*acw*v1*fcd*bw*s/(fywd)
Asw max = mm2 7980 7980 7980 7980 7980 7980 7980 7980
Asw required = mm2 813 709 1092 699 1075 679 870 671
s = spacing of stirrups mm 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
No. of legs for stirrups Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
diameter of stirrup mm 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
No. of links for stirrups Nos 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Asw provided mm2 2317 2317 2317 2317 2317 2317 2317 2317
Shear reinft provided Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
VRd,s kN 8478 8478 8478 8478 8478 8478 8478 8478
OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY
Check for additional Longitudinal Steel for shear
ΔFtd 0.5 xVEd (cot (q) -cot (a)) a is angle of stirrups
ΔFtd 1487.5 1297.4 1997.1 1279.6 1967.5 1242.0 1592.5 1228.3
(Med - MR)/ z = 10899.5 10970.2 10649.3 11128.5 10659.6 11142.5 10829.6 11071.7
Additional Steel reqd = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
17.1 Minimum Distribution Steel at Bottom
Minimum Steel Requirement = 5007 mm2
Provide 12 mm Dia @ 125 mm
Provided Steel = 5881 OK
17.2 Check for Maximum Reinforcement (As per Clause [Link] )
Area of tensile steel As = 25034.57 mm2 OK
Area of compression steel As' = 5881.06 mm2
0.025Ac= 292500 mm2
0.04Ac= 468000 mm2
Total provided Steel in tension and compression = 30916 mm2 OK
17.3 Check for Minimum Reinforcement (As per Clause [Link] )
2
1. As,min = 0.26fctm/fyk btd = 15392.52 mm
Pier _P2 Design of Footing Trans

2
2. As,min =0.0013 btd = 15210.00 mm
2
Ast required max of case 1 & 2 = 15392.52 mm OK
17.4 Longitudinal Steel at Top
Minimum Steel Requirement = 5007 mm2
Provide 16 mm Dia @ 125 mm
Provided Steel = 10455 OK
17.5 Minimum Distribution Steel at Top = 250.0 mm2/m
(as per Cl. 707.2.8 of IRC:78-2014)
Provide 16 mm Dia @ 804.2 mm
Hence Provide 16 mm Dia @ 125 mm c/c OK
Pier _P2 CW-FDN Trans

18.0 Crack Width Check for foundation raft Transverse Direction

Concrete Grade fck = 25

Concrete Modulus Ec = 30000 N/mm2
Steel Modulus Es = 200 KN/mm2
Service Stage Moment = 851.65 KNm
Allowable crackwidth wadm = 0.3 mm
Section depth d = 1800 mm
Section width bt = 6500.00 mm
Minimum cover cmin = 50 mm
Bar spacing s = 125 mm
Bar diameter f = 25 mm
Effective depth h = 1737.5 mm
Area of tensile steel As = 25035 mm2
Area of compressive steel As' = 5881.06 mm2
M under Serviceability Limit State(SLS)= 851.65 KN-m

Check for Cracking

Depth to neutral axis,y = 900 mm
4
Second Moment of Inertia, I = 3.159E+12 mm
If the section is uncracked, compressive and tensile stress at the top and bottom of the section respectivley
would be σtop =σbottom = M*y/I = 0.24 Mpa
From Table 6.5, fctm corresponding to M 25 = 2.2 Mpa
Since, 2.2 > 0.24
Therefore the section is uncracked.
Pier _P2 Pier_cap

19.0 DESIGN OF PIER CAP (LHS)

Length of pier cap (Trans direction) = 7.70 m

Length of pier cap (Long direction) = 2.10 m

Width of pier (Trans Direction) = 4.50 m

Width of pier (Long Direction) = 1.30 m
Size of Pedestal
c/c Distance between bearing (Trans) = 2.50 m LHS 800 x 600
c/c Distance between bearing (Long) = 0.61 m RHS 800 x 600

Skew = 0
4500
Transverse Direction
LHS 1350 1350
2500 2500
745 745

Direction of Traffic
Longitudinal

LHS 1 2 3
Direction

Movement
1300 305 2100
RHS 305
4 5 6

745 745
2500
RHS 7700

Section in Trans direction

Distance of point of load from face of support a = 251 mm

Overall depth of section at face of support h = 1500 mm

Congestion Factor= 1.00

Impact Factor for Class A= 1.18
Imact Factor for 70R= 1.18
LL Case ( Max Reaction)
Total Total
Reaction on Reaction on
LHS RHS
TYPE 1 IL_A FRW 323.22 186.76
TYPE2 1L_70RFRW 484.96 551.75
TYPE3 IL_A REV 190.54 319.31
TYPE4 1L_70R REV 552.40 484.34
TYPE5 2L_ClA_Forw 646.44 373.51
TYPE6 2L_ClA_Rev 381.07 638.62
TYPE7 2L_(ClA For +ClA Rev) 513.76 506.07

FOR 1Lane_ Class A

TYPE 1 TYPE3
Reaction Reaction Reaction
Reaction Factor Reaction LHS
LHS RHS RHS
R1 0.75 242.22 142.78
R2 0.28 90.90 53.58
R3 -0.03 -9.90 -5.83
R4 0.75 139.95 239.29
R5 0.28 52.52 89.80
R6 -0.03 -5.72 -9.78

FOR 2Lane_ Class A

TYPE5 TYPE6 TYPE7
Reaction Reaction Reaction
Reaction Factor Reaction LHS Reaction LHS Reaction LHS
RHS RHS RHS
R1 0.35 227.90 134.35 181.13
R2 0.37 242.36 142.87 192.61
R3 0.27 176.19 103.86 140.02
R4 0.35 131.68 225.15 178.41
R5 0.37 140.03 239.43 189.73
R6 0.27 101.80 174.06 137.93

FOR 70R Lane

TYPE2 TYPE4
Reaction Reaction
Reaction Factor Reaction LHS Reaction LHS
RHS RHS
R1 0.40 194.57 221.62
R2 0.63 306.30 348.89
R3 -0.03 -15.90 -18.12
R4 0.40 221.36 194.32
R5 0.63 348.48 305.90
Pier _P2 Pier_cap

R6 -0.03 -18.10 -15.88

Congestion Factor= 1.00

Impact Factor for Class A= 1.18
Imact Factor for 70R= 1.18
LL Case ( Max Moment)
LHS RHS
TYPE 1 IL_A FRW 0.00 378.92
TYPE2 1L_70RFRW 0.00 909.55
TYPE3 IL_A REV 0.00 459.65
TYPE4 1L_70R REV 0.00 874.78
TYPE5 2L_ClA_Forw 0.00 757.85
TYPE6 2L_ClA_Rev 0.00 919.30
TYPE7 2L_(ClA For +ClA Rev) 0.00 838.57

FOR 1Lane_ Class A

TYPE 1 TYPE3
Reaction Reaction Reaction
Reaction Factor Reaction LHS
LHS RHS RHS
R1 0.75 0.00 0.00
R2 0.28 0.00 0.00
R3 -0.03 0.00 0.00
R4 0.75 283.96 344.45
R5 0.28 106.56 129.27
R6 -0.03 -11.60 -14.07
Pier _P2 Pier_cap

FOR 2Lane_ Class A

TYPE5 TYPE6 TYPE7
Reaction Reaction Reaction
Reaction Factor Reaction LHS Reaction LHS Reaction LHS
RHS RHS RHS
R1 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00
R2 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00
R3 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00
R4 0.35 267.18 324.10 295.64
R5 0.37 284.12 344.66 314.39
R6 0.27 206.55 250.56 228.55

FOR 70R Lane

TYPE2 TYPE4
Reaction Reaction
Reaction Factor Reaction LHS Reaction LHS
RHS RHS
R1 0.40 0.00 0.00
R2 0.63 0.00 0.00
R3 -0.03 0.00 0.00
R4 0.40 364.91 350.97
R5 0.63 574.46 552.50
R6 -0.03 -29.83 -28.69

Max Reaction Case(sqm) R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6

DL 369.89 369.89 369.89 369.89 369.89 369.89
W.C. 37.56 37.56 37.56 37.56 37.56 37.56
SIDL (From STAAD) 93.04 93.04 93.04 93.04 93.04 93.04
LL (Max Reaction Case) 242.22 348.89 176.19 239.29 348.48 174.06
LL (Max Moment Case) 0.00 0.00 0.00 364.91 574.46 250.56

2500
LHS
1 2 3
2500 2500 750

750

0
2761

2500
RHS

3 4 5 750
2500 2500 750

0
2761

Self Wt. of Cantilever portion of cap transverse direction

C.G. from face
Thk Width Length Volume Wt.
of wall
Uniform 0.75 1.05 1.60 1.260 31.50 0.80
Trapezoidal 0.75 0.35 1.60 0.210 5.25 0.53
Projection 1.50 0.35 0.05 0.013 0.33 0.03
37.08 KN
Pier _P2 Pier_cap

c.g. of cantilever portion of cap= 0.76 Transverse Direction

Self Wt. of Cantilever portion of cap Long Direction

C.G. from face
Thk Width Length Volume Wt.
of wall
Uniform 0.75 7.7 0.40 2.31 57.75 0.2
Triangular 0.75 6.2 0.40 0.92 23.06 0.13
Projection 1.50 6.2 0.05 0.23 5.77 0.025
86.58 KN
c.g. of cantilever portion of cap= 0.17 Long Direction

Maximum Force on outermost Bearing

LHS RHS Long Moment
LL (Max Reaction) 348.89 239.29 33.43
LL (Max Moment Case) 0.00 364.91 -111.30

Computation of Seismic Force

FRL 102.897
Pier Cap Top 100.688
Depth of cap 1.50
HL HT Lever Arm ML MT
Due to DL 106.53 125.53 2.60 277.45 326.96
SIDL 26.80 31.58 2.60 69.79 82.24
Pedestal 2.92 3.44 1.62 4.72 5.56
Pier Cap (Rec) 3.02 3.56 0.38 1.13 1.34
Pier Cap (Trap por) 0.50 0.59 0.50 0.25 0.30
Pier Cap(proj) 0.03 0.04 0.75 0.02 0.03
LL 0.00 8.26 4.91 0.00 40.53

Load Cases Load HL HT Long Mom Tran Mom

Dead Load of S.S 369.9 0.00 0.00
SIDL (Except w.c.) 93.04 0.00 0.00
SIDL (only for w.c.) 37.6 0.00 0.00
Dead Load of Cap (Trans) 37.1 28.18
Dead Load of Cap (Long) 86.6 14.72
Wind force 97.8 3.8 15.2 2.85 11.41
Seismic Longitudinal 139.8 353.37
Seismic Transverse 173.0 456.95
Max LL 364.91 111.30 0.00
Max FPLL 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hor Force 0.00 112.80 0.00 484.81 0.00
Hor Force Long Seis 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Hor Force Trabs Seis 0.00 22.16 0.00 91.92 0.00

Pier _P2 Pier_cap

19.1 Summary of loads and Moment @ base of Pier wall (As per Table B.2 & B.3 of IRC:6-2017)

SLS(Frequent Combination)
Partial Factor of Safety for

Partial Factor of Safety for

Partial Factor of Safety for

Partial Factor of Safety for

Accidental Combination

seismic combination
Basic Combination
Load Cases Load HL HT Long Mom Tran Mom
Permanent Load during service
Dead Load of S.S 369.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
SIDL (Except w.c.) 93.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
SIDL (only for w.c.) 37.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.75 1.00 1.75 1.00
Dead Load of Cap 86.6 0.0 0.0 14.7 28.2 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
Shrinkage Effect 0.0 68.3 0.0 688.6 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Permanent Load (During construction)
Dead Load of S.S 184.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
SIDL (Except w.c.) 46.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
SIDL (only for w.c.) 18.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.75 1.00 1.75 1.00
Dead Load of Cap 43.3 0.0 0.0 7.4 14.1 1.35 1.00 1.35 1.00
Shrinkage Effect 0.0 68.3 0.0 688.6 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Variable Load (Leading)
Max LL (Leading) 364.91 0.00 0.00 111.30 0.00 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00
FPLL (Leading) 0.00 0 0 0 0 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00
Wind force (Leading) 97.81 3.80 15.21 2.85 11.41 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hor Force 0.00 112.80 0.00 484.81 0.00 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00
Hor Force Long Seis 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00
Hor Force Trabs Seis 0.00 22.16 0.00 91.92 0.00 1.50 0.75 0.00 0.00
Variable Load (Accompanying)
Max LL (Accompanying) 364.91 0.00 0.00 111.30 0.00 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00
FPLL ((Accompanying)) 0.00 0 0 0 0 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00
Wind force (Accompanying) 97.81 3.80 15.21 2.85 11.41 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hor Force 0.00 112.80 0.00 484.81 0.00 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00
Hor Force Long Seis 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00
Hor Force Trabs Seis 0.00 22.16 0.00 91.92 0.00 1.15 0.20 0.20 0.00
Variable Load (During construction)
Max LL 36.49 0.00 0.00 11.13 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.00 0.00
FPLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 1.00 1.00 0.00
Seismic Effect (During service)
Seismic Longitudinal 0.00 139.80 0.00 353.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00
Seismic Transverse 0.00 0.00 173.00 0.00 456.95 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00
Seismic Effect (During construction)
Seismic Longitudinal 0.00 139.80 0.00 353.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00
Seismic Transverse 0.00 0.00 173.00 0.00 456.95 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00

19.2 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for Basic Combination

Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN) Long Mom Tran Mom

Load Cases (KNM) (KNm)

Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL

(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom) 1442.97 172.62 13.69 916.61 48.31
Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Accompanying)+Wind Load (Leading) 1373.94 135.42 22.81 709.68 55.15

Case III- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During
service) 917.05 0.00 0.00 53.26 38.04

Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During
service) 891.50 25.48 0.00 151.18 38.04

Case V- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During
service) 891.50 0.00 0.00 45.47 38.04

Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL

Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During
service) 891.50 25.48 0.00 151.18 38.04

Case VII- Permanent load

(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction) 413.64 0.00 0.00 12.94 19.02
Pier _P2 Pier_cap

Case VIII- Permanent load

(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction) 413.64 0.00 0.00 12.94 19.02

19.3
Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for Accidental Combination

Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN) Long Mom Tran Mom

Load Cases (KNM) (KNm)
Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom) 860.76 84.60 0.00 461.80 28.18
Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Accompanying)+Wind
Case Load
III- Permanent Load+ (Leading)
20% LL(Leading) +LL 660.06 22.56 0.00 133.94 28.18
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During
service)
Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL 641.81 0.00 0.00 31.41 28.18
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During
service)
Case V- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL 601.67 4.43 0.00 37.55 28.18
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During
service)
Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL 601.67 0.00 0.00 19.17 28.18
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During
service)
Case VII- Permanent load 601.67 4.43 0.00 37.55 28.18
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction)
Case VIII- Permanent load 300.83 0.00 0.00 9.59 14.09
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction) 300.83 0.00 0.00 9.59 14.09

19.4 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for seismic combination

Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN) Long Mom Tran Mom

Load Cases (KNM) (KNm)
Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom) 807.57 0.00 0.00 19.87 38.04
Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Accompanying)+Wind Load
Case III- Permanent Load+ (Leading)
20% LL(Leading) +LL 880.55 22.56 0.00 139.09 38.04
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During
service)
Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL 807.57 902.50 6.65 19.87 94.37
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During
service)
Case V- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL 822.17 4.43 259.50 42.71 723.47
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During
service)
Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL 822.17 209.70 0.00 554.38 38.04
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During
service)
Case VII- Permanent load 822.17 4.43 259.50 42.71 723.47
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction)
Case VIII- Permanent load 411.08 104.85 0.00 277.19 19.02
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction) 411.08 0.00 129.75 12.16 361.73
Pier _P2 Pier_cap

19.5 Summary table for forces (under different Load Combination) taking into account for Partial factor of saftey for SLS (Frequent Combination)

Load (KN) HL (KN) HT (KN) Long Mom Tran Mom

Load Cases (KNM) (KNm)
Case- I-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Leading)+Wind Load (Accom) 587.07 68.30 0.00 703.35 28.18
Case-II-Permanent load(Service)+LL
(Accompanying)+Wind Load
Case III- Permanent Load+ (Leading)
20% LL(Leading) +LL 587.07 68.30 0.00 703.35 28.18
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During
service)
Case IV- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Leading) +LL 587.07 68.30 0.00 703.35 28.18
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During
service)
Case V- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL 587.07 68.30 0.00 703.35 28.18
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Long (During
service)
Case VI- Permanent Load+ 20% LL(Accom) +LL 587.07 68.30 0.00 703.35 28.18
Surcharge (Accom) +Seismic_Trans (During
service)
Case VII- Permanent load 587.07 68.30 0.00 703.35 28.18
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Long(Construction)
Case VIII- Permanent load 293.54 0.00 0.00 7.36 14.09
(Construction)+Variable load
(Construction)+Seismic_Trans(Construction) 293.54 68.30 0.00 696.00 14.09

Moment = 28.18
Torsion = 703.35
Equ Moment 241.34727
Design Moment= 269.53
Pier _P2 Design of Pier cap

20.0 Design of Pier Cap(LHS)

ALL DISTANCES ARE IN M, STRESSES IN MPA, FORCES IN KN AND MOMENTS IN KNM
ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE CHECK FOR MOMENT, SHEAR AND TORSION AS PER IRC:112-2011

Density Concrete (kn/cu.m) 25 Beam fck 25 Mpa Ec 30000 Mpa

Pier fck 25 Mpa Ec 30000 Mpa
Sectional Properties
Load Case case 1 case 2 case 3 case 4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Section at Cap Cap Cap Cap Cap Cap Cap Cap
LC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
No. of webs 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Width of TOP beam, B (mm) 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100
Depth of top beam, D (mm) 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500
Area of Sec 3.150 3.150 3.150 3.150 3.150 3.150 3.150 3.150
Moment of Inertia (I) m4 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591
C.G. of Sec I from top 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750
Perimeter of Girder m 7.20 7.200 7.200 7.200 7.200 7.200 7.200 7.200
Moment of Inertia m4 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591
depth of section m 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500 1.500
CG of Section (bot) m 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750 0.750
Z bot of section m4 0.788 0.788 0.788 0.788 0.788 0.788 0.788 0.788
Z top of section m4 0.788 0.788 0.788 0.788 0.788 0.788 0.788 0.788
Width of Web m 2.100 2.100 2.100 2.100 2.100 2.100 2.100 2.100
Grade of concrete =M 25 MPa
Grade of steel = Fe500
(fck) = 25.00
(fywk) = 500.00 (fywk)/γ 434.782609 N/mm2
Ten. strength of conc (fctm) = 2.20 N/mm2 Table-6.5, p-38,IRC-112
Design yld of shear reinf fywd = 0.8*fyk/γs = 347.83 N/mm2 Clause-[Link] P-91
[Link]. factor for conc (γm) = 1.50 MPa Clause-[Link] P-49
Part. mat factor for Steel (γs) = 1.15 MPa Clause-6.2.2 P-30
Ult. comp strain in the conc (єcu3) = 0.0035 Basic Table-6.5, p-38,IRC-112
[Link] of reinforcing of steel (Es) = 200000 Basic Clause-6.2.2 P-29
[Link] of concrete (Ecm) = 30000 Table-6.5, p-38,IRC-112
modular ratio αe (Es/Ecm) = 6.67 N/mm2
[Link] strain in the steel (єs) = [{fywk/(γs xEs)}+0.002] = 0.0042 MPa IS 456 clause 38.1
[Link] influence of the concrete strength (a) = 0.67 (.67 for cube/0.85 cylinder) Cube Clause-[Link] P-49
Factor (λ) = 0.80 page-242
0.8 Up to fck ≤ 60Mpa,Eq.A2-33 (IRC:112-2011); 0.8-((fck-60)/500) for 60<fck<110Mpa
Factor (Ƞ) = 1.00 page-242
1.0 Up to fck ≤ 60Mpa,Eq.A2-35 (IRC:112-2011); 1.0-((fck-60)/250) for 60<fck<110Mpa
.
fcd = (a*fck/γm) = 11.17 Clause-[Link] P-48
Factor Fav (λȠfcd) = 8.93
Factor b = (Ƞ/2) = 0.40

DESIGN OF BEAM
For Combination I case 1 case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Ve = Vu + Tu*1.6/b Cap Cap Cap Cap Cap Cap Cap Cap
Me = Mu + Tu/1.7*(1+D/b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Shear = KN 1442.97 1373.94 917.05 891.50 891.50 891.50 413.64 413.64
Torsion = KNm 916.61 709.68 53.26 151.18 45.47 151.18 12.94 12.94
Moment = KNm 48.31 55.15 38.04 38.04 38.04 38.04 19.02 19.02
Design Eq Shear = KN 2141.34 1914.65 957.62 1006.68 926.14 1006.68 423.50 423.50
Design Eq Moment = KNm 972.62 770.79 91.75 190.49 83.89 190.49 32.07 32.07
Width of beam, B = mm 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100
Depth of beam, D = mm 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500
No of layers = 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Dia of Main. Bar = mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
cover to reinf. = mm 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Dia of botom reinf = mm 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
deff provided = 1397 1397 1397 1397 1397 1397 1397 1397
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = (d*ecu3)/(es+ecu3)'mm'
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = mm 636.93 636.93 636.93 636.93 636.93 636.93 636.93 636.93
Minimum [Link] = mm2 4095 4095 4095 4095 4095 4095 4095 4095
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reinf provided = mm2 15708 15708 15708 15708 15708 15708 15708 15708
Xu in mm = mm 364.0 364.0 364.0 364.0 364.0 364.0 364.0 364.0
IS Xu is less then the limiting Xulim Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Bar Spacing 129 129 129 129 129 129 129 129
Ultimate moment of resistance= KNm 8542.95 8542.95 8542.95 8542.95 8542.95 8542.95 8542.95 8542.95
Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Check for Ultimate Shear Strength at Various Xn. (Vide Cl:10.3 of I.R.C:-112-2011)
MEd
VRd,c Design shear resistance of member without shear reinforcement
VRd,max Design maximum shear force that can be sustained by the member by crushing of compression struts
VRd,s Design shear force that can be sustained by yeilding of reinforcement
Vccd Design value of shear component of force in compression area in case of inclined compression chord
Vtd Design value of shear component of force in tensile reinforcement in case of inclined tensile chord
VRd Design shear resistance of member with shear reinforcement
VRd VRd.s + Vccd + Vtd
VEd Design shear force at C/s due to external applied loads + prestressing
VNs Net shear force in web at design section
VNs VEd -Vccd -Vtd -VPd (-ve for downward; +ve is upwards)
Pier _P2 Design of Pier cap

.
. case 1 case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Cap Cap Cap Cap Cap Cap Cap Cap
VEd 2141.34 1914.65 957.62 1006.68 926.14 1006.68 423.50 423.50
VPd 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
VNs 2141.34 1914.65 957.62 1006.68 926.14 1006.68 423.50 423.50
fck 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00
fyk 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 500.00
K 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37
d m 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
bw m 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10
bwc m 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10
Asl mm2 15708 15708 15708 15708 15708 15708 15708 15708
Asc mm2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
S = (Ay)c m3 2.363 2.363 2.363 2.363 2.363 2.363 2.363 2.363
I m4 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591
Ϭcp MPA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
fywd MPA 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78
fcd MPA 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17 11.17
fctd = fctk/γm 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
acw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
v 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552
v1 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600
ρ1 0.0050 0.0000 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050
Ɵ deg 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0
.
For Elements not requiring shear reinforcement as per Cl. 10.3.2
VRd,c [0.12*K(80*ρ1*fck)^0.33 + 0.15Ϭcp] bw d
VRd,c kN 1109.9 0.0 1109.9 1109.9 1109.9 1109.9 1109.9 1109.9
VRd,c (min) kN 778.8 778.8 778.8 778.8 778.8 778.8 778.8 778.8
VRd,c kN 1110 779 1110 1110 1110 1110 1110 1110
VEd, < 9701 9701 9701 9701 9701 9701 9701 9701
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
VEd, actual kN 2141 1915 958 1007 926 1007 423 423
Shear Reinforcement is Reqd Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd
. Nominal Shear reinforcement reqd for cap
VRd,s Asw*z*fywd*cotƟ / s
VRd,max acw*bw*z*v1*fcd/(cotƟ+tanƟ)
VRd,max kN 8731 8731 8731 8731 8731 8731 8731 8731
ρmin = . 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072
Asw min = mm2 195 195 195 195 195 195 195 195
Asw max = 0.5*acw*v1*fcd*bw*s/(fywd)
Asw max = mm2 2087 2087 2087 2087 2087 2087 2087 2087
Asw required = mm2 471 421 210 221 204 221 93 93
s = spacing of stirrups mm 129 129 129 129 129 129 129 129
diameter of stirrup mm 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
No. of legs for stirrups Nos 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
diameter of stirrup mm 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
No. of links for stirrups Nos 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14
Asw provided mm2 1810 1810 1810 1810 1810 1810 1810 1810
Shear reinft provided Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
VRd,s kN 8234 8234 8234 8234 8234 8234 8234 8234
OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY
Check for additional Longitudinal Steel for shear
ΔFtd 0.5 xVEd (cot (q) -cot (a)) a is angle of stirrups
ΔFtd 1070.7 957.3 478.8 503.3 463.1 503.3 211.7 211.7
(Med - MR)/ z = 6023.3 6183.8 6724.1 6645.6 6730.4 6645.6 6771.6 6771.6
Additional Steel reqd = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

DESIGN OF BEAM
For accidental Combination case 1 case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Ve = Vu + Tu*1.6/b Cap Cap Cap Cap Cap Cap Cap Cap
Me = Mu + Tu/1.7*(1+D/b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Shear = KN 860.76 660.06 641.81 601.67 601.67 601.67 300.83 300.83
Torsion = KNm 461.80 133.94 31.41 37.55 19.17 37.55 9.59 9.59
Moment = KNm 28.18 28.18 28.18 28.18 28.18 28.18 14.09 14.09
Design Eq Shear = KN 1212.61 762.11 665.74 630.28 616.27 630.28 308.14 308.14
Design Eq Moment = KNm 493.86 163.24 59.86 66.05 47.51 66.05 23.75 23.75
Width of beam, B = mm 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100
Depth of beam, D = mm 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500
No of layers = 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Dia of Main. Bar = mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
cover to reinf. = mm 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Dia of Transverse bar = mm 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
deff provided = 1396.5 1396.5 1396.5 1396.5 1396.5 1396.5 1396.5 1396.5
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = (d*ecu3)/(es+ecu3)'mm'
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = mm 636.9305949 636.9305949 636.9305949 636.930595 636.930595 636.93059 636.9305949 636.9305949
Minimum [Link] = mm2 4095 4095 4095 4095 4095 4095 4095 4095
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reinf provided = mm2 15707.96327 15707.96327 15707.96327 15707.9633 15707.9633 15707.963 15707.96327 15707.96327
Xu in mm = mm 364.0484673 364.0484673 364.0484673 364.048467 364.048467 364.04847 364.0484673 364.0484673
IS Xu is less then the limiting Xulim Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Bar Spacing 129 129 129 129 129 129 129 129
Ultimate moment of resistance= KNm 8542.950749 8542.950749 8542.950749 8542.95075 8542.95075 8542.9507 8542.950749 8542.950749
Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Pier _P2 Design of Pier cap

Check for Ultimate Shear Strength at Various Xn. (Vide Cl:10.3 of I.R.C:-112-2011)
MEd
VRd,c Design shear resistance of member without shear reinforcement
VRd,max Design maximum shear force that can be sustained by the member by crushing of compression struts
VRd,s Design shear force that can be sustained by yeilding of reinforcement
Vccd Design value of shear component of force in compression area in case of inclined compression chord
Vtd Design value of shear component of force in tensile reinforcement in case of inclined tensile chord
VRd Design shear resistance of member with shear reinforcement
VRd VRd.s + Vccd + Vtd
VEd Design shear force at C/s due to external applied loads + prestressing
VNs Net shear force in web at design section
VNs VEd -Vccd -Vtd -VPd (-ve for downward; +ve is upwards)
.
. case 1 case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
cap cap cap cap cap cap cap cap
VEd 1212.60803 762.105361 665.7432129 630.2815514 616.274743 630.281551 308.13737 308.1373715
VPd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
VNs 1212.60803 762.105361 665.7432129 630.2815514 616.274743 630.281551 308.13737 308.1373715
fck 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
fyk 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500
K 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37
d m 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
bw m 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10
bwc m 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10
Asl mm2 15707.96327 15707.96327 15707.96327 15707.96327 15707.9633 15707.9633 15707.963 15707.96327
Asc mm2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
S = (Ay)c m3 2.3625 2.3625 2.3625 2.3625 2.3625 2.3625 2.3625 2.3625
I m4 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591
Ϭcp MPA 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
fywd MPA 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783
fcd MPA 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167
fctd = fctk/γm 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900
acw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
v 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552
v1 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600
ρ1 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005
Ɵ deg 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000
For Elements not requiring shear reinforcement as per Cl. 10.3.2
VRd,c [0.12*K(80*ρ1*fck)^0.33 + 0.15Ϭcp] bw d
VRd,c kN 1109.903315 1109.903315 1109.903315 1109.903315 1109.90331 1109.90331 1109.9033 1109.903315
VRd,c (min) kN 778.7750602 778.7750602 778.7750602 778.7750602 778.77506 778.77506 778.77506 778.7750602
VRd,c kN 1109.903315 1109.903315 1109.903315 1109.903315 1109.90331 1109.90331 1109.9033 1109.903315
VEd, < 9701.491935 9701.491935 9701.491935 9701.491935 9701.49194 9701.49194 9701.4919 9701.491935
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
VEd, actual kN 1212.61 762.11 665.74 630.28 616.27 630.28 308.14 308.14
Shear Reinforcement is Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd
. Nominal Shear reinforcement reqd for cap
VRd,s Asw*z*fywd*cotƟ / s Eq 10.7
VRd,max acw*bw*z*v1*fcd/(cotƟ+tanƟ) Eq 10.8
VRd,max kN 8731.342742 8731.342742 8731.342742 8731.342742 8731.34274 8731.34274 8731.3427 8731.342742
ρmin = . 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072
Asw min = mm2 195.048 195.048 195.048 195.048 195.048 195.048 195.048 195.048
Asw max = 0.5*acw*v1*fcd*bw*s/(fywd)
Asw max = mm2 2087.28 2087.28 2087.28 2087.28 2087.28 2087.28 2087.28 2087.28
Asw required = mm2 266.50 167.49 146.32 138.52 135.44 138.52 67.72 67.72
s = spacing of stirrups mm 129 129 129 129 129 129 129 129
diameter of stirrup mm 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
No. of legs for stirrups Nos 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
diameter of stirrup mm 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
No. of links for stirrups Nos 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14
Asw provided mm2 1809.557368 1809.557368 1809.557368 1809.557368 1809.55737 1809.55737 1809.5574 1809.557368
Shear reinft provided Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
VRd,s kN 8233.577511 8233.577511 8233.577511 8233.577511 8233.57751 8233.57751 8233.5775 8233.577511
OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY
Check for additional Longitudinal Steel for shear
ΔFtd 0.5 xVEd (cot (q) -cot (a)) a is angle of stirrups
ΔFtd 606.30 381.05 332.87 315.14 308.14 315.14 154.07 154.07
(Med - MR)/ z = 6404.18 6667.23 6749.49 6744.56 6759.31 6744.56 6778.21 6778.21
Additional Steel reqd = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

DESIGN OF CAP
For Seismic combination case 1 case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
Ve = Vu + Tu*1.6/b cap cap cap cap cap cap cap cap
Me = Mu + Tu/1.7*(1+D/b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Shear = KN 807.57 880.55 807.57 822.17 822.17 822.17 411.08 411.08
Torsion = KNm 19.87 139.09 19.87 42.71 554.38 42.71 277.19 12.16
Moment = KNm 38.04 38.04 94.37 723.47 38.04 723.47 19.02 361.73
Design Eq Shear = KN 822.71 986.53 822.71 854.71 1244.55 854.71 622.28 420.35
Design Eq Moment = KNm 58.08 178.30 114.41 766.53 597.08 766.53 298.54 374.00
Width of beam, B = mm 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100 2100
Depth of beam, D = mm 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500 1500
No of layers = 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Dia of Main. Bar = mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
cover to reinf. = mm 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50
Dia of Transverse bar = mm 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
deff provided = 1396.5 1396.5 1396.5 1396.5 1396.5 1396.5 1396.5 1396.5
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = (d*ecu3)/(es+ecu3)'mm'
Limiting Neu axis depth (x lim) = mm 636.9305949 636.9305949 636.9305949 636.930595 636.930595 636.93059 636.9305949 636.9305949
Minimum [Link] = mm2 4095 4095 4095 4095 4095 4095 4095 4095
Pier _P2 Design of Pier cap

k (web) = 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65

fct,eff = max of 2.8, fctm = 2.80
Act (web) = 2.39 2.39 2.39 2.39 2.39 2.39 2.39 2.39
kc (web) = 0.4*(1-sc/(k1.(h/h*).fctef)= 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
As,min = 4992.85 4992.85 4992.854992.85 4992.85 4992.85 4992.85 4992.85
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16
Dia of bars mm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
Nos Nos 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reinf provided = mm2 15707.96 15707.96 15707.96
15707.96 15707.96 15707.96 15707.96 15707.96
Xu in mm = mm 364.05 364.05 364.05 364.05 364.05 364.05 364.05 364.05
IS Xu is less then the limiting Xulim Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
Bar Spacing 129 129 129 129 129 129 129 129
Ultimate moment of resistance= KNm 8542.95 8542.95 8542.95 8542.95 8542.95 8542.95 8542.95 8542.95
Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe

Check for Ultimate Shear Strength at Various Xn. (Vide Cl:10.3 of I.R.C:-112-2011)
MEd
VRd,c Design shear resistance of member without shear reinforcement
VRd,max Design maximum shear force that can be sustained by the member by crushing of compression struts
VRd,s Design shear force that can be sustained by yeilding of reinforcement
Vccd Design value of shear component of force in compression area in case of inclined compression chord
Vtd Design value of shear component of force in tensile reinforcement in case of inclined tensile chord
VRd Design shear resistance of member with shear reinforcement
VRd VRd.s + Vccd + Vtd
VEd Design shear force at C/s due to external applied loads + prestressing
VNs Net shear force in web at design section
VNs VEd -Vccd -Vtd -VPd (-ve for downward; +ve is upwards)
.
. case 1 case 2 case 3 case4 case 5 case 6 case 7 case 8
cap cap cap cap cap cap cap cap
VEd 822.7106216 986.529774 822.7106216 854.7059644 1244.55429 854.705964 622.27715 420.349578
VPd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
VNs 822.7106216 986.529774 822.7106216 854.7059644 1244.55429 854.705964 622.27715 420.349578
fck 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
fyk 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500
K 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37 1.37
d m 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
bw m 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10
bwc m 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10 2.10
Asl mm2 15707.96327 15707.96327 15707.96327 15707.96327 15707.9633 15707.9633 15707.963 15707.96327
Asc mm2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
S = (Ay)c m3 2.3625 2.3625 2.3625 2.3625 2.3625 2.3625 2.3625 2.3625
I m4 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591 0.591
Ϭcp MPA 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
fywd MPA 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783 434.783
fcd MPA 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167 11.167
fctd = fctk/γm 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900 1.900
acw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
v 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552 0.552
v1 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600 0.600
ρ1 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005
Ɵ deg 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000 45.000
For Elements not requiring shear reinforcement as per Cl. 10.3.2
VRd,c [0.12*K(80*ρ1*fck)^0.33 + 0.15Ϭcp] bw d
VRd,c kN 1109.90 1109.90 1109.90 1109.90 1109.90 1109.90 1109.90 1109.90
VRd,c (min) kN 778.78 778.78 778.78 778.78 778.78 778.78 778.78 778.78
VRd,c kN 1109.90 1109.90 1109.90 1109.90 1109.90 1109.90 1109.90 1109.90
VEd, < 9701.49 9701.49 9701.49 9701.49 9701.49 9701.49 9701.49 9701.49
OK OK OK OK OK OK OK OK
VEd, actual kN 822.71 986.53 822.71 854.71 1244.55 854.71 622.28 420.35
Shear Reinforcement is Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd Not Reqd
. Nominal Shear reinforcement reqd for cap
.
VRd,s Asw*z*fywd*cotƟ / s Eq 10.7 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max acw*bw*z*v1*fcd/(cotƟ+tanƟ) Eq 10.8 with vert shear reinf
VRd,max kN 8731.342742 8731.342742 8731.342742 8731.342742 8731.34274 8731.34274 8731.3427 8731.342742
ρmin = . 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072 0.00072
Asw min = mm2 195.048 195.048 195.048 195.048 195.048 195.048 195.048 195.048
Asw max = 0.5*acw*v1*fcd*bw*s/(fywd)
Asw max = mm2 2087.2845 2087.2845 2087.2845 2087.2845 2087.2845 2087.2845 2087.2845 2087.2845
Asw required = mm2 180.8135122 216.8173214 180.8135122 187.8453775 273.525376 187.845378 136.76269 92.38349615
s = spacing of stirrups mm 129 129 129 129 129 129 129 129
diameter of stirrup mm 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
No. of legs for stirrups Nos 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
diameter of stirrup mm 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
No. of links for stirrups Nos 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14
Asw provided mm2 1809.557368 1809.557368 1809.557368 1809.557368 1809.55737 1809.55737 1809.5574 1809.557368
Shear reinft provided Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe Safe
VRd,s kN 8233.58 8233.58 8233.58 8233.58 8233.58 8233.58 8233.58 8233.58
OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY OKAY
Check for additional Longitudinal Steel for shear
ΔFtd 0.5 xVEd (cot (q) -cot (a)) a is angle of stirrups
ΔFtd 411.36 493.26 411.36 427.35 622.28 427.35 311.14 210.17
(Med - MR)/ z = 6750.90 6655.25 6706.08 6187.23 6322.05 6187.23 6559.58 6499.55
Additional Steel reqd = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pier _P2 Design of Pier cap

20.1 Minimum Distribution Steel at Bottom

Minimum Steel Requirement = 3142
Provide 16 mm Dia @ 129 mm
Provided Steel = 3273 OK
20.2 Check for Maximum Reinforcement (As per Clause [Link] )
Area of tensile steel As = 15707.96 mm2 OK
Area of compression steel As' = 3273.10 mm2
0.025Ac= 78750 mm2
0.04Ac= 126000 mm2
Total provided Steel in tension and compression = 18981 mm2 OK
20.3 Check for Minimum Reinforcement (As per Clause [Link] )
1. As,min = 0.26fctm/fyk btd = 4144.14 mm2
2. As,min =0.0013 btd = 4095.00 mm2
2
Ast required max of case 1 & 2 = 4144.14 mm OK
Pier _P2 CW-PC

21.0 Crack Width Check for Pier Cap

Concrete Grade fck = 25

Concrete Modulus Ec = 30000 N/mm2
Steel Modulus Es = 200 KN/mm2
Service Stage Moment = 269.53 KNm
Allowable crackwidth wadm = 0.3 mm
Section depth d = 1500 mm
Section width bt = 2100 mm
Minimum cover cmin = 50 mm
Bar spacing s = 129 mm
Bar diameter f = 25 mm
Effective depth h = 1437.5 mm
Area of tensile steel As = 15707.96 mm2
Area of compression steel As' = 3273.10 mm2
M under Serviceability Limit State(SLS)= 269.53 KN-m

Check for Cracking

Depth to neutral axis,y = 750 mm
Second Moment of Inertia, I = 5.90625E+11 mm4
If the section is uncracked, compressive and tensile stress at the top and bottom of the section respectivley
would be σtop =σbottom = M*y/I = 0.34 Mpa
From Table 6.5, fctm corresponding to M = = 2.2 Mpa
Since, 2.2 > 0.34
Therefore the section is uncracked.
STRUCTURE DRAWING
 PROPOSED BRIDGE - A2SIDE)
X= 2618756.301
WL
96.145 Y= 375409.117
PROPOSED BRIDGE - A1SIDE)
X= 2618742.897 DO
W
Y= 375329.070 N

31
0M
PROPOSED BRIDGE

300
ALIGNMENT
77.44109.360 19.360

M
19.360
19.360

27
0M
240 M
210 M
180 M
HFL
0M

150 M
99.258
30 M

12
M

0M
60

90 M

UP

6 5 4 3
6 5 4 3
 A1 P1 P2 P3 A2

TOTAL LENGTH OF BRIDGE F/F OF DIRT WALL = 77480

TO MERUDARU SIDE
TO GANDHAUNIA SIDE
19360 C/C EXP GAP 19360 C/C EXP GAP 19360 C/C EXP GAP 19360 C/C EXP GAP
40mm 40mm WIDE
TYP. EXP. JOINT 18750 C/C OF BEARING 18750 C/C OF BEARING 18750 C/C OF BEARING 18750 C/C OF BEARING TYP. EXP. JOINT
300mm THK. R.C.C. 300mm THK. R.C.C.
APPROACH SLAB M30 APPROACH SLAB M30
CL OF BEARING FORMATION LEVEL DECK SLAB TOP
OVER 100 mm THK. OVER 100 mm THK.
LEVELING COURSE IN 305 610 R.L. 102.897 610 R.L. 102.797 610 305 LEVELING COURSE IN
M-15 GRADE CONC. M-15 GRADE CONC.

400 400

1500

1500

1500
600mm THK. 600mm THK.

1875
FILTER MEDIA SOFFIT LEVEL H.F.L. 99.258 FILTER MEDIA
1300
RETURN WALL
R.L. 100.922

1300
FOUNDING L. FOUNDING L.
R.L. 91.242
1300
R.L. 91.221
FOUNDING L. FOUNDING L. FOUNDING L.

1800

1800
1500 1500

1800
2000

2000
R.L. 89.316 R.L. 89.040 R.L. 88.819
4500 3500 3500 4500
6500 6500 6500
9500 9500

97.316

96.540

96.819

99.721
BED LEVEL(m)
99.742
170.331

189.691

209.051

228.411

247.771
CHAINAGE(m)
L OF CARRIAGEWAY

A1 P1 P2 P3 A2
19360 C/C EXP GAP 19360 C/C EXP GAP 19360 C/C EXP GAP 19360 C/C EXP GAP
300
500

CL CARRIAGEWAY
6500 CL BEARING CL BEARING

APPROACH SLAB
1300
8450

8450
7500

7500
C

1500
4500 3500 40mm WIDE STRIP SEAL
9500
SHOWING HALF BOTTOM PLAN SHOWING HALF TOP PLAN

PLAN
 TABLE OF REINFORCEMENT

Bar Bar SPACING/Nos. SHAPE

Mark Diameter (mm)
 C
L OF PIER & EXP GAP
40mm WIDE STRIP SEAL TYP. EXP. JOINT CL OF CARRIAGEWAY
305 305 7700 100 7500 100

100
BEARING OF CL C
L OF BEARING 1350 2500 2500 1350
SEISMIC 3750 3750
FORMATION LEVEL 500 C OF BEARING C C
L OF BEARING
RL. 102.987 RESTRANER L L OF BEARING

1000
PIER CAP LEVEL

84
150

150
RL. 100.688

1875
100

750 750
100 500 400

3250
5800

1500
150
PIER CAP TOP LEVEL

84
650 4500 650
RL. 100.688
750 750

50 5900 50
1500

6500

1300
950 950

2100
50 50

3250
1300
RCC PIER SHAFT

100
GROUND LEVEL PLAIN PCC M-10

GROUND LEVEL

100 100
100 100

1000 800
1800
800
1800

FOUNDING LEVEL
1000

FOUNDING LEVEL 650 4500 650

3250 3250 100 7500 100
100 6500 100
L OF PEDESTAL

L OF PEDESTAL

L OF PEDESTAL
L OF BEARING

500
150 84

TABLE FOR PROPOSED LEVEL

234

L OF PIER CAP

PIER NO. GROUND LV. FOUND. LV.

500
C

P1 97.316 89.316
C

800
P2 96.540 89.040
1050

500
305 305

P3 96.819 88.819
2100

1300
C

1050

500
SEISMIC
RESTRANER
100 RCC PIER SHAFT 100
620

320

1350 2500 2500 1350

7700

800
 TABLE OF REINFORCEMENT

Bar Bar SPACING/Nos. SHAPE

Mark Diameter (mm)