g
g
9 35kNm2 fatty
ox by
EI I 921g
42
q 72 9 3,069x Gy
35
9 3,069 7 8,62KNW
Gg 26,38KNm2
Max bending moments
MI 917
x Ird d d d dd
É 862472 17,6KNm
Im M [Link] 35,2kt
3524dm y
K y
Ta GKNM
g Mt [Link] 2 26,38 4
4 17,55kt
M [Link] zy
35i1W
H f
e3yknm
117,55KNm
be
ox 09
F 9
14 I Egg
7
gg 4
5 9y 1,88 qx
9
35 12,15KNW
9 1,889 9
9g 22,85 KNIN
Max bending moments
X Mt 12,15
7424
24,8kt
12,15 71,2
M
51,04ns
511 151 Knm
24,8
Y Only positive moments
Mt 9g Ly 2485 448
45,741
I 45,7 UNM
fed 0,85 25 1,5 14,2MPa
ratio For 2 tag slab check Id for shorter span
g
direction
3
Y Interior span k 1,5 Po Rst 10 0,005 p
2
4 1,111 1,5 F 8985 3,27 5 27,75
00
1980 19105227,75 Ok
Reinforcement
X direction
Mrd 0,28 fed b É 928 14,2 1000
21002
1594dm
Zt i o
Mf 200 l 0,17
3 1.200 193,8 mon
ASI Mt 29 ios 344mm 5010 393mm
fga Zt [Link]
910201
46 106 566 7 6012 1678mn
As 435 11 0,174541.200
mm
012C
Ole
Controls Snax min I 250mm
Asmine 0,0013bd 260 mad ok
direction
g
dy
Mr 0,28 14,2 1000 2102 17TUNM
Ast 41 106 467 ma 5010 565mm
435 11 0,17 210
s
0106201
As 1159mm's 8914 1231mn
435 4 9,6 2 o
q14C
it As As min Sat Sas Sima
Control
I ratio
Look at mid pointofshorter span y direction
p Ast 2105
00
90027 Po 9005
dy's
0,0027 cats 6,005 assumed
As is smaller than assumed The concrete will in fact be
p
under even less stress and therefore the span is ok
it could in fact be longer
Rebar in bottom Rebar in top
A B
a
o O
4m 014 12517 you
1 0100200 p f o 0126150 I
o
A B
I I I I
7m 7m
10 O o o o o of
0120150
1014 150
no o o
od 8 Ho
A A B B