Laboratory Testing of Smokeless Tobacco
Laboratory Testing of Smokeless Tobacco
net/publication/323007129
CITATIONS READS
5 3,877
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Prakash C Gupta on 08 February 2018.
Of
Dr Prakash C. Gupta,
Vice-President,
Action Council against Tobacco - India
Dr Sreevidya S,
Project Coordinator,
Epidemiology Research unit
Tata memorial Hospital
Parel, Mumbai.
1
INDEX
1. Objectives 4
2. Justification 5
5. Activities 9
7a. Determination of pH 12
2
8. Conclusions, recommendations and limitations 46
9. Bibliography 47
Annexes
3
1. Objectives
4
2. Justification
In India a vast array of smokeless tobacco products are used. All these products
reveal adverse health consequences. Oral tobacco use can lead to nicotine
dependence and addiction. There is conclusive scientific evidence that the use of
smokeless tobacco causes cancer in humans. The evidence is strongest for cancers of
the oral cavity, but the risk of cancers of the pharynx, larynx, oesophagus, pancreas
and urinary tract are also increased. Smokeless tobacco use also increases the
incidence of periodontal disease and causes oral leukoplakia, which in some cases
may become malignant, and may contribute to cardiovascular disease, and peptic
ulcer. A few cohort studies from India demonstrate significant excess of all cause
mortality among smokeless tobacco users. Several studies of smokeless tobacco use
by pregnant women in India demonstrate adverse reproductive outcomes, especially
low birth weight. In India, as in many parts of South East Asia, oral cancer is a
leading type of malignancy. Oral leukoplakia and oral submucous fibrosis, assumed
to be precursors of oral cancers are also highly prevalent and increasing in the young.
During the Global Youth Tobacco Survey that has been completed in 13 states and
ongoing in eight more, several new smokeless tobacco products that are in use in
different parts of the country have been discovered. They include a large variety of
manufactured pan masala and gutka products, red tooth powders, gul and toibur
(nicotine water). In fact some of them for example red tooth powders, do not even
mention that they contain tobacco. We got some samples of red tooth powders tested
for their nicotine content in a laboratory and the results showed substantive nicotine
content. It is obvious that they do contain tobacco. These results combined with
general ignorance amongst the lay public as well as scientists working on tobacco
control clearly underscore a need for conducting a systematic study of different
smokeless tobacco products
5
3. Smokeless tobacco products: an overview.
Chewing tobacco in India is made from Nicotiana rustica and N tabacum. The
tobacco leaves are harvested when they turn yellow and brown spots start appearing:
the leaves remain in the field and are turned over to achieve uniform drying. They are
then tied in bundles and moistened by sprinkling with water; the bundles are stacked
for fermentation for a couple of weeks, separated and dried again. The leaves are cut
into various sizes. Tobacco is chewed in betel quid and may sometimes be chewed
as such. Chewing tobacco in betel quid being the commonest form of smokeless
tobacco use in India. The tobacco used in the quid however varies; it may be
processed (Zarda, Kiwam) or unprocessed (Hogesoppu, Kadippudi in Karnataka).
Tobacco is commonly used with lime, (Khaini), and placed in the mouth, in one or
both cheeks or in the mandibular groove. This mixture is available in various pouches
or may also be prepared fresh. Mawa, popular among teenagers especially in Gujarat,
contains thin shavings of areca nut with some sun-dried tobacco and slaked lime. A
similar product used in Maharashtra is called Kharra.
Zarda, which is produced and used in India, is also exported to countries across the
world. Tobacco leaf, broken into small pieces is boiled in water with lime and spices
until evaporation. The residual particles are then dried and colored with vegetable
dyes to produce Zarda. It is typically flavoured with cardamom and saffron. Zarda is
usually chewed mixed with finely cut areca nut and spices, or is placed in the betel
quid.
Gutka, a dry preparation commercialised since 1975, containing areca nut, slaked
lime, catechu, condiments and powdered tobacco, was originally available custom
mixed from pan-vendors. For the last couple of decades, Gutka has been available in
several brands. A similar packaged mixture without tobacco, often with identical
brand name is called pan masala. These products have become especially popular
among teenagers and young adults in many states of India. Moist Swedish snus is
now being marketed in India under the brand name Click.
6
4. Smokeless tobacco constituents and their importance.
Natural tobacco contains at least about 3050 compounds. Among the tumorigenic
agents identified in smokeless tobacco are volatile aldehydes, N-nitrosamines,
lactones, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, certain metals and radioactive
polonium. Furthermore, smokeless tobacco may be enhanced by flavouring agents,
added in the form of plant extracts, or chemicals. The chemical structures of these
can be found in Annex-2.
Heavy metals: - the heavy metals viz. Lead, Cadmium, Selenium, Chromium,
Arsenic and Nickel are capable of causing serious human disease, as they are toxic
even at trace levels. Great deal is known about overwhelming exposure through
poisoning or industrial exposure; but our knowledge of the consequences of the
chronic low-level trace metal exposure, as occurs with tobacco use, is still inadequate.
The levels of these metals accumulate cumulatively with many years of use and lead
to increasing body burdens of these metals. There is evidence of subtle brain damage
like mentation difficulties, deficits in intelligence and memory, impaired psychomotor
and visual function with chronic lead exposure. Chronic arsenic exposure is
associated with cutaneous lesions, alopecia, liver disease and skin cancers. Chronic
cadmium exposure may result in emphysema, proteinuria, or olfactory nerve damage.
Nickel is considered a potent respiratory tract carcinogen. Hepatic dysfunction,
diffuse dermatitis and gastrointestinal disturbances have been observed in selenium
7
toxicity. Chromium exposure is associated with lung and certain upper respiratory
tract cancers and also with renal tubule dysfunction.
Products with low nicotine content and pH levels have a smaller proportion of free
nicotine. In contrast, products with high nicotine content and pH levels have a higher
proportion of free nicotine
8
5. Activities
The major components identified for testing were the alkaloids including nicotine, the
tobacco specific nitrosamines, Benzo-a-pyrene, ammonia, nitrates and nitrites, heavy
metals, triacetin, sodium propionate, humectants, sorbic acid, Eugenol, and animal
hemoglobin.
Several laboratories that would possibly carry out these tests were contacted. The
laboratory, which was finally identified as being the most credible and offering high
quality assurance for its testing processes for most constituents identified, was the
Indian Institute of Environmental Medicine, Mumbai. Dr. Rohini Chowgule is the
Founder-Director, with the laboratory headed by Dr R. N. Khandekar, a retired
scientist from the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. Dr Khandekar was involved with
testing of constituents of cigarette smoke, and was very much interested in proceeding
with the proposed project. The list of constituents for which testing would be
required was discussed with Dr Khandekar. The only one they were unable to do was
animal hemoglobin.
The costs involved were negotiated; the cost for testing for all of the constituents for
each of the Smokeless tobacco samples was negotiated at Rs. 13500 provided the
testing was done in a batch of minimum of 20 smokeless tobacco products totalling
Rs. 270000. This cost was 9 times higher than the cost we originally estimated and
budgeted.
9
The lab In contrast to 30 g of each sample that had been initially required by the lab
for completing all of the testing processes, it was later realised that 300g would be
required. 500g of each product was purchased and the extra 200g that remained after
testing was retained in our office for future use and verification.
Smokeless tobacco products are available in pouches of various weights, ranging from
1-13g each, depending on the brand. A weighing scale with an error of 2g (max 500g,
min 20g) was purchased for weighing of the smokeless tobacco products before
dispatch to the laboratory. Few pouches of each product were opened and the
contents weighed without the wrapper. It was found that all products contained
approximately the same quantity as reported on the wrapper.
300g of each of the 20 products were handed over to the lab in their original pouches.
Thus the lab was not blinded to the brands being tested. This was with the intention
of not contaminating the products while transferring to a different pouch, preserving
their shelf life, and for the ease of laboratory testing, in which small quantities are
used at time.
10
6. Analytical techniques: An overview
In general, the Canadian standards for testing smokeless tobacco constituents were
followed.
All analyses were done in duplicate. The control sample in each test served as a
quality control measure. Each analytical run also included a laboratory reagent blank
to evaluate the extent of any interference due to glassware, reagents and analyser
effects. Each measurement was made against a blank preparation.
The sample was first ground and sieved on a 20micron sieve. It was then extracted
with known quantity of a suitable solvent and by appropriate physical means; use of
ultrasonic bath, mechanical shaker, or after appropriate distillation as for triacetin.
The tobacco extract was subjected to analysis by most sensitive instrument and
conditions of analyses for each constituent. A tabulation of the method of analysis
used for the various constituents can be found in Annex-3.
A calibration curve was prepared by plotting the concentration of the standards versus
their respective peak areas. The response factor was determined from the calibration
curve. The calibration curves developed for each of the constituents are presented in
Annex-4.
11
7a. DETERMINATION OF pH
This method is used to determine the pH of 10% w/v suspension of sample in water
by means of a pH meter. The method utilizes a combination electrode and
potentiometer standardized by buffer solutions to measure the pH.
The electrode and auto-temp probe are then inserted into the beaker containing the
supernatant. The beaker is gently moved in swirling motion to create movement of
the supernatant passing by the electrode.
A buffer of known pH (ph 6 – 7) is measured and the value obtained should be within
0.10 pH units of the expected value. The pH of the tobacco sample extract is then
read. The pH in duplicate for the 20 samples are as presented under.
pH analysis
Sr. no Product Name
pH1 pH2
Sanket 999Jarda + Sanket No. 1 Supari
1 8.9 8.89
Mix
Moolchand Superb Jarda +Moolchand
2 8.56 8.55
Superb Supari
3 Shimla Jarda + Shimla Supari Mix 8.8 8.79
4 Goa 1000 Zarda + Goa 1000 Supari 8.8 8.81
5 Gutkha Pan Parag 8.63 8.62
6 Gutkha Manikchand 8.75 8.74
7 Click Eucalyptus 6.95 6.94
8 Baba Zarda 120 5.21 5.22
9 Dentobac Creamy Snuff 7.52 7.5
10 Lime Mix - Miraj Tobacco 10.1 10.11
11 Shahin Mishri 6.53 6.54
12 Dabur Red Tooth Powder 6.76 6.75
13 Baidhyanath Red Tooth Powder 5.74 5.75
14 Gai Chhap Zarda 5.96 5.95
15 Raja Khaini 8.45 8.46
16 Gutkha Tulsi Mix 9.25 9.24
17 IPCO Creamy Snuff 8.35 8.34
18 Kuber Gutkha 8.92 8.93
19 Vimal Gutkha 9.06 9.07
20 Tuiber Tobacco Water 9.26 9.25
12
7b. ESTIMATION OF AMMONIA BY U.V. SPECTROMETRY
One gram of sample was mixed with 200 ml of D.D.W. and transferred to the
distillation flask of Kjeldahl’s apparatus. Few antibumping granules were also added
to the flask to promote regular ebulliation in the subsequent distillations.
100 ml of standard 0.1 M HCl was placed in a receiver and the flask was adjusted so
that the end of the condenser just dips into the acid. 100 ml of NaOH was placed in
the funnel and run into the flask opening the tap. The tap was closed as soon as the
alkali had entered. The flask was heated so that the contents boiled gently and the
distillation was continued for 40-50 minutes by which time ammonia passed over into
the receiver.
13
7c. ESTIMATION OF MAGNESIUM CARBONATE.
Calculations:
0.01 N ( EDTA ) X x ( ml )
1 ) Total Ca + Mg = ---------------------------------------
50 ml
14
Estimation of Total Carbonate, Calcium Carbonate and Magnesium Carbonate
Total
CaCO3 µg/g MgCO3 µg/g
Sr. carbonateµg/g
Product Name
no
1 2 1 2 1 2
Sanket 999Jarda +
1 540 580 293 315 247 265
Sanket No. 1 Supari
Moolchand Superb Jarda
2 500 560 272 304 228 256
+Moolchand Superb Supari
Shimla Jarda +
3 440 480 239 261 201 219
Shimla Supari Mix
4 Goa 1000 Zarda + Goa Supari 520 540 283 293 237 247
5 Gutkha Pan Parag 600 580 326 315 274 265
6 Gutkha Manikchand 520 560 283 304 237 256
7 Click Eucalyptus 620 560 337 304 283 256
8 Baba Zarda 120 2040 2000 1109 1087 931 913
9 Dentobac Creamy Snuff 660 620 359 337 301 283
10 Lime Mix - Miraj tobacco 1480 1440 804 783 676 657
11 Shahin Mishri 1760 1820 957 989 803 831
12 Dabur Red Toothpowder 160 140 87 76 73 64
13 Baidhyanath Red Toothpowder 220 180 120 98 110 82
14 Gai Chhap Zarda 1840 1900 1000 1016 840 884
15 Raja Khaini 380 420 207 228 173 192
16 Gutkha Tulsi Mix 620 600 337 326 283 274
17 IPCO Creamy Snuff 560 600 304 326 256 274
18 Kuber Gutkha 800 720 435 391 365 329
19 Vimal Gutkha 700 720 380 391 320 329
20 Tuiber Tobacco Water 140 160 76 87 64 73
15
7d. ESTIMATION OF NICOTINE IN SMOKELESS TOBACCO SAMPLES:
Nicotine was extracted from tobacco by using chloroform, and tobacco extracts were
analysed by gas chromatography to determine the nicotine content.
Extraction:
Analytical Conditions:
Column: 3 % ov – 101.
Detector: FID.
Attenuation: 8.
16
Nicotine content of the samples tested.
17
7e. ESTIMATION OF ALKALOIDS IN SMOKELESS TOBACCO SAMPLES:
The alkaloids were extracted from tobacco by using potassium hydroxide in methanol,
and the tobacco extracts were analysed by gas chromatography to determine the
alkaloid content.
Analytical Conditions:
Attenuation : 4.
Calculations:
18
Nornicotine and anabasine concentrations in smokeless tobacco samples
19
Myosmine and anatabine concentrations in smokeless tobacco samples
20
7f. DETERMINATION OF NITROSAMINES IN TOBACCO SAMPLES:
Extraction Procedure:
21
Concentrations of N-Nitrosonornicotine (NNN), 4(N-methyl-N-Nitrosamino)1-(3-
pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNK), N-nitrosoanabasine (NAB), N-nitrosoanatabine
(NAT), in the smokeless tobacco samples.
22
7g. ESTIMATION OF BENZO [a] PYRENE IN SMOKELESS TOBACCO
SAMPLES:
Analytical Conditions:
Temperature Programme:
Oven Temp.: 130 degree C.
Time: ---- min.
Rate: 4.0 degree / min. to 290 degree C.
Total Run Time: 40 minutes.
Injector Temp: 200 degree C.
Detector Temp: 250 degree C.
Polarity: Negative.
Back off: Negative.
X 10.
Calculations:
Area of sample Conc. of Standard 50
Concentration ug / g = -------------------- X ---------------------- X ------
Area of standard 1 1
23
Concentration of Benzopyrene in smokeless tobacco samples
Benzo[a]pyrene ug/g
Sr. no Product Name
1 2
24
7h. ESTIMATION OF NITRATE
Calculations:
ppm Nitrogen (µg/ml ) X 50 ( ml )
Concentration µg / g = -----------------------------------------------
0.5 g sample
25
Nitrate µg/g
Sr.
Product Name
no Nitrate 1 Nitrate 2
1 Sanket 999 Jarda + Sanket No. 1 Supari Mix < 0.1 < 0.1
Moolchand Superb Jarda +Moolchand Superb
2 6.68 8.01
Supari
3 Shimla Jarda + Shimla Supari Mix < 0.1 < 0.1
4 Goa 1000 Zarda + Goa Supari < 0.1 < 0.1
5 Gutkha Pan Parag < 0.1 < 0.1
6 Gutkha Manikchand < 0.1 < 0.1
7 Click Eucalyptus 8.01 5.34
8 Baba Zarda 120 12.02 10.68
9 Dentobac Creamy Snuff 8.01 9.35
10 Lime Mix - Miraj Tobacco 13.85 10.68
11 Shahin Mishri 13.35 5.34
12 Dabur Red Tooth Powder < 0.1 < 0.1
13 Baidhyanath Red Tooth Powder < 0.1 < 0.1
14 Gai Chhap Zarda 4.01 4.01
15 Raja Khaini 12.02 9.35
16 Gutkha Tulsi Mix < 0.1 < 0.1
17 IPCO Creamy Snuff 9.35 9.35
18 Kuber Gutkha 5.34 5.34
19 Vimal Gutkha < 0.1 < 0.1
20 Tuiber Tobacco Water < 0.1 < 0.1
26
7i. ESTIMATION OF HEAVY METALS IN SMOKELESS TOBACCO
SAMPLES
The concentration of the heavy metals is very low (few micrograms to nanograms) as
compared to the other constituents in tobacco. Reliable estimation thus requires an
ultrasensitive method of detection and measurement. After studying some of the
sensitive techniques capable of analysis of ultra-trace levels, differential pulse
stripping voltammetry was chosen due to its ability to analyse simultaneously many
metals at ultra-trace levels even without prior chemical separation in addition to high
sensitivity, inherent reliability and accuracy being added advantages.
All chemicals used were Merck, Suprapur, Analar or electronic grade. Standard stock
solutions (0.01 M) of Ni, Pb, Cd, Cr, As, Se and Hg were prepared and necessary
dilutions were made as and when required.
Pretreatment:
In view the low concentrations of the trace metals generally expected in tobacco
samples, extreme care was taken to avoid contamination. One gram of each sample
was digested with nitric acid (1ml) and perchloric acid (0.5ml), for about 2 hours.
The residual was taken in 10 ml of 0.25% Nitric acid (Electronic grade) and taken into
the electrolytic cell.
Quality assurance:
Analysing the standard reference materials has checked the reliability of the
procedure of estimation of the heavy metals in the tobacco samples.
The values have also been independently checked with measurements using other
sensitive techniques such as atomic absorption spectrophotometry. One of the
important factors for achieving reliability has been our endeavour to maintain clean
blanks with extremely low background concentrations for heavy metals. The precision
for replicate analysis is usually better than + 8.0%.
27
Measurement procedure for estimation of Lead:
After nitrogen purging Lead is electrodeposited for one minute on Hanging Drop
Mercury Electrode with initial potential of - 0.6 V.
After nitrogen purging cadmium is electrodeposited for one minute on Hanging Drop
Mercury Electrode with initial potential of - 0.6 V.
After nitrogen purging Selenium is electrodeposited for one minute on Hanging Drop
Mercury Electrode with initial potential of - 0.8 V.
28
Measurement procedure for estimation of Arsenic:
After nitrogen purging Arsenic is electrodeposited for one minute on Hanging Drop
Mercury Electrode with initial potential of - 0.4 V.
After nitrogen purging Nickel is electrodeposited for one minute on Hanging Drop
Mercury Electrode with initial potential of - 1.6 V.
Chromium standard solution was prepared from K2Cr2O7. Stock standard solution of
50 ppb was prepared. Different standard solutions were prepared by making suitable
dilutions.
29
Preparation of background electrolyte:-
Background electrolyte was prepared in D.D.W.
Sample preparation:
Sample is digested in HNO3 and HCl 4, evaporated to dryness and finally taken in
background electrolyte as per required volume from this.
6 ml of sample was taken, pH was adjusted to 6.2 in 30% NaOH and analysed by
anodic stripping voltammetry after calibration.
Pretreatment:
Sample: 100g + Acid 250ml. Keep for wet digestion till white residue is obtained.
Measurement Procedure:
30
[Link] Product Name Cadimum µg/g Lead µg/g nickel ug/g Arsenic
µg/g
Cd1 Cd2 Pb1 Pb2 Ni 1 Ni 2 As 1 As 2
Sanket 999Jarda +
1 Sanket No. 1 Supari 0.07 0.07 0.15 0.15 0.02 0.04 0.72 0.64
Mix
Moolchand Superb
2 Jarda +Moolchand 0.27 0.25 0.34 0.27 0.01 0.01 1.94 1.86
Superb Supari
Shimla Jarda +
3 Shimla Supari Mix
0.19 0.2 0.2 0.22 0.07 0.08 0.19 0.2
4 Goa 1000 Zarda + Supari 0.19 0.2 0.043 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.3 0.38
5 Gutkha Pan Parag 0.17 0.17 0.14 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.6 0.54
6 Gutkha Manikchand 0.19 0.19 0.23 0.22 0.02 0.02 0.17 0.18
7 Click Eucalyptus 0.03 0.03 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.07
8 Baba Zarda 120 0.5 0.51 0.94 0.98 0.04 0.03 0.43 0.36
9 Dentobac Creamy Snuff 0.14 0.16 0.56 0.61 0.02 0.04 0.73 0.56
10 Lime Mix - Miraj Tobacco 0.07 0.07 0.14 0.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.78 0.88
11 Shahin Mishri 0.11 0.12 0.29 0.31 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.53 0.1
12 Dabur Red Tooth Powder 0.17 0.19 4.85 4.97 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.16 0.1
13 Baidhyanath Red Tooth 0.25 0.22 5.14 5.04 0.01 0.01 0.25 0.21
14 Gai Chhap Zarda 0.23 0.23 0.53 0.53 0.04 0.05 0.39 0.35
15 Raja Khaini 0.04 0.04 0.31 0.35 0.05 0.05 0.11 0.17
16 Gutkha Tulsi Mix 0.11 0.12 0.18 0.2 0.02 0.01 0.3 0.22
17 IPCO Creamy Snuff 0.07 0.07 0.13 0.13 0.06 0.05 0.84 0.74
18 Kuber Gutkha 0.08 0.08 0.24 0.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.11 1.08
19 Vimal Gutkha 0.011 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.14 0.13
20 Tuiber Tobacco Water 0.011 0.012 0.015 0.018 0.03 0.01 1.08 1.02
31
Sr.n
Product Name Mercur Mercur Selenium Selenium Chromium µg/g
o
y µg/g y µg/g
µg/g µg/g µg/g
Sanket 999Jarda +
<0.000
1 Sanket No. 1 Supari <0.0002<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
2
Mix
Moolchand Superb
<0.000
2 Jarda +Moolchand <0.0002<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
2
Superb Supari
Shimla Jarda + Shimla <0.000
3 <0.0002<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
Supari Mix 2
Goa 1000 Zarda + <0.000
4 <0.0002<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
Supari 2
<0.000
5 Gutkha Pan Parag <0.0002<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
2
<0.000
6 Gutkha Manikchand <0.0002<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
2
<0.000
7 Click Eucalyptus <0.0002<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
2
<0.000
8 Baba Zarda 120 <0.0002<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
2
Dentobac Creamy <0.000
9 <0.0002<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
Snuff 2
Lime Mix - Miraj <0.000
10 <0.0002<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
Tobacco 2
<0.000
11 Shahin Mishri <0.0002<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
2
<0.000
12 Dabur Red Tooth <0.0002<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
2
<0.000
13 Baidhyanath Red <0.0002<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
2
<0.000
14 Gai Chhap Zarda <0.0002<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
2
<0.000
15 Raja Khaini <0.0002<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
2
<0.000
16 Gutkha Tulsi Mix <0.0002<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
2
<0.000
17 IPCO Creamy Snuff <0.0002<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
2
<0.000
18 Kuber Gutkha <0.0002<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
2
<0.000
19 Vimal Gutkha <0.0002<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
2
<0.000
20 Tuiber Tobacco Water <0.0002<0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002 <0.0002
2
32
7j. Determination of Eugenol
Summary:
This method is used to separate and identify Eugenol in the ethanol extract of the
sample. The extract is filtered and analysed using reversed phase/isocratic High
Performance Liquid Chromatography with ultra violet detection. For standards
external standard calibration procedure is observed. 20 ul of each standard is injected
into HPLC and analysed. A calibration curve is prepared by plotting concentration of
Eugenol vs. peak area. The response factor is determined from the calibration curve.
Preparation of Standards:
1) Prepare primary Eugenol stock solution by accurately taking 190 ul of pure
Eugenol liquid into 100 ml of Ethanol.
2) Six working standards are prepared (ranging from 2 ug/ml to 1000 ug/ml) by
diluting appropriately with ethanol.
3) Eugenol calibration standards are prepared afresh every five working days, which
are stored in dark and at 4 °C until analysed.
33
Flow rate: 0.7 ml / minute.
Sample Analysis:
1) 20 ul of each sample vial is injected onto HPLC column and analysed.
2) Identification of peaks is done by comparison of retention times with standards and
the spiking of the samples.
By entering correct multiplier (overall volume of original sample in ml) and divisor
(original sample wt. in grams) the concentration of eugenol is calculated in ug/g.
To convert this conc. in a percentage (%) the ug/g result is divided by 10,000.
The results are expressed on an “as conditioned” basis. These may be expressed on a
dry matter basis using the appropriate moisture result.
Normative References:
[Link] Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
D 1193-77-Standard Specifications for Reagent Water.
Version 1977.
34
Eugenol ug/g
Sr. no Product Name
Eugenol 1 Eugenol 2
Sanket 999 Jarda + Sanket No. 1
1 71.83 74.93
Supari Mix
Moolchand Superb Jarda +Moolchand
2 303.06 300.33
Superb Supari
3 Shimla Jarda + Shimla Supari Mix 875.67 867.3
4 Goa 1000 Zarda + Goa Supari 96.89 92.78
5 Gutkha Pan Parag 1164.95 1122.4
6 Gutkha Manikchand 405.94 403.65
7 Click Eucalyptus < 0.00005 < 0.00005
8 Baba Zarda 120 20348.8 20261.1
9 Dentobac Creamy Snuff 25373.53 25706.13
10 Lime Mix - Miraj Tobacco 13.97 12.82
11 Shahin Mishri 6345.45 6094.77
12 Dabur Red Tooth Powder 6648.43 6606.2
13 Baidhyanath Red Tooth Powder 1220.55 1250.61
14 Gai Chhap Zarda < 0.00005 < 0.00005
15 Raja Khaini < 0.00005 < 0.00005
16 Gutkha Tulsi Mix 273.73 265.51
17 IPCO Creamy Snuff 165.56 161.22
18 Kuber Gutkha 1439.14 1370.72
19 Vimal Gutkha 8.91 9.38
20 Tuiber Tobacco Water 41.72 42
35
7k. Determination of Sorbic Acid
Summary:
This method estimates the amount of Sorbic Acid by reversed phased high
performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and UV detection. External standards are
used in this method.
Preparation of Standards:
Prepare different working standards ranging the sorbate concentration from 0.0 ug/ml
to 100 ug/ml. (0, 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 ug/ml).
Sorbic Acid calibration standards are prepared afresh every five working days which
are stored at 4 °C until analysed.
20 ul of each standard is injected into HPLC and analysed.
A calibration curve is prepared by plotting concentration of Sorbic Acid vs. peak area.
Determine response factor from calibration curve.
Sample Generation:
Weigh accurately 1g finely chopped (20 mesh) tobacco into a 50 ml glass beaker.
Add 30 ml hot (50 °c) Type I water to the sample and sonicate for 30 minutes at 50
°c.
Centrifuge at 1200 rpm for 10 min and filter the aliquote.
Decant the water into a 100 ml standard flask.
Similarly extract another 1g of tobacco and collect the extract resulting from 2g of
tobacco.
Allow to cool and make the volume to 100 ml.
Mix well, filter and transfer the aliquot into a test tube for HPLC analysis.
Sample Analysis:
Chromatographic Conditions:
36
Mobile phase : Gradient.
20 ul of each sample is injected onto HPLC.
Normative References:
37
[Link] Product Name Sorbic Acid ug/g
1 2
Sanket 999 Jarda + Sanket No. 1 Supari
1 < 0.00005 < 0.00005
Mix
Moolchand Superb Jarda +Moolchand
2 < 0.00005 < 0.00005
Superb Supari
3 Shimla Jarda + Shimla Supari Mix < 0.00005 < 0.00005
4 Goa 1000 Zarda + Goa Supari < 0.00005 < 0.00005
5 Gutkha Pan Parag < 0.00005 < 0.00005
6 Gutkha Manikchand < 0.00005 < 0.00005
7 Click Eucalyptus < 0.00005 < 0.00005
8 Baba Zarda 120 0.59 0.53
9 Dentobac Creamy Snuff 1315.43 1284.42
10 Lime Mix - Miraj Tobacco < 0.00005 < 0.00005
11 Shahin Mishri < 0.00005 < 0.00005
12 Dabur Red Tooth Powder < 0.00005 < 0.00005
13 Baidhyanath Red Tooth Powder < 0.00005 < 0.00005
14 Gai Chhap Zarda < 0.00005 < 0.00005
15 Raja Khaini < 0.00005 < 0.00005
16 Gutkha Tulsi Mix < 0.00005 < 0.00005
17 IPCO Creamy Snuff < 0.00005 < 0.00005
18 Kuber Gutkha < 0.00005 < 0.00005
19 Vimal Gutkha < 0.00005 < 0.00005
20 Tuiber Tobacco Water < 0.00005 < 0.00005
38
7l. Determination of Triacetin
Extraction: Weigh 2 g of the tobacco sample in a flask and add to it 150 ml aq. 0.5
H2SO4. Steam distill this mixture. Collect the distillate in a flask under
approximately 25 ml of Distilled water. Collect approximately 200 ml of the
distillate. Transfer the distillate to a 500 ml separating funnel and add to it 50 ml of
methylene chloride. Shake the separating funnel. Drain off and collect extracted
methylene chloride fraction into a 250 ml conical flask. The extraction is carried for
two more times, thus collecting total of 150 ml of the extract. This 150 ml extract is
evaporated to 1 ml. This l ml extract is taken for the analysis in Gas Chromatograph.
Calculations:
39
Triacetin ug/g
Sr. no Product Name
1 2
1 Sanket 999Jarda + Sanket No. 1 Supari Mix <0.0001 <0.0001
Moolchand Superb Jarda +Moolchand Superb
2 0.04 0.06
Supari
3 Shimla Jarda + Shimla Supari Mix 0.06 0.05
4 Goa 1000 Zarda + Goa Supari <0.0001 <0.0001
5 Gutkha Pan Parag <0.0001 <0.0001
6 Gutkha Manikchand 0.033 0.036
7 Click Eucalyptus <0.0001 <0.0001
8 Baba Zarda 120 0.01 0.03
9 Dentobac Creamy Snuff <0.0001 <0.0001
10 Lime Mix - Miraj Tobacco <0.0001 <0.0001
11 Shahin Mishri <0.0001 <0.0001
12 Dabur Red Tooth Powder 0.021 0.024
13 Baidhyanath Red Tooth Powder <0.0001 <0.0001
14 Gai Chhap Zarda 0.31 0.28
15 Raja Khaini 0.033 0.038
16 Gutkha Tulsi Mix <0.0001 <0.0001
17 IPCO Creamy Snuff <0.0001 <0.0001
18 Kuber Gutkha 0.034 0.036
19 Vimal Gutkha <0.0001 <0.0001
20 Tuiber Tobacco Water <0.0001 <0.0001
40
7m. Determination of Sodium Propionate
Extraction:
Calculations:
41
Na-propionate
ug/g
Sr. no Product Name
1 2
42
7n. Estimation Procedure for Humectants
(Glycerol, Propylene Glycol and Triethylene Glycol)
Chromatographic conditions:
Temperature Programme:
43
Triethylene
[Link] Product Name Propylene glycol µg/g µg/g
glycol µg/g Glycerol
TEG 1 TEG 2 PG 1 PG 2 GLY 1 GLY2
Sanket 999 Jarda + Sanket
1 <0.0001<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
No. 1
Moolchand Superb Jarda
2 <0.0001<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
+Moolchand
Shimla Jarda + Shimla Supari
3 651.38 647.53 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
Mix
4 Goa 1000 Zarda + Supari <0.0001<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
5 Gutkha Pan Parag <0.0001<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
6 Gutkha Manikchand <0.0001<0.0001 211.77 214.84 <0.0001 <0.0001
7 Click Eucalyptus <0.0001<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
8 Baba Zarda 120 <0.0001<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
9 Dentobac Creamy Snuff <0.0001<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
10 Lime Mix - Miraj <0.0001<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
11 Shahin Mishri 1174.81 1120.94 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
12 Dabur Red Tooth Powder 6250.61 6270.26 5870.08 5774.16 <0.0001 <0.0001
13 Baidhyanath Red tooth powder 316.75 322.69 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
14 Gai Chhap Zarda <0.0001<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
15 Raja Khaini 269.45 262.56 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
16 Gutkha Tulsi Mix <0.0001<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
17 IPCO Creamy Snuff <0.0001<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
18 Kuber Gutkha <0.0001<0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
19 Vimal Gutkha <0.0001<0.0001 382.5 370.69 <0.0001 <0.0001
20 Tuiber Tobacco 2399.72 2321.42 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
44
7o. Determination of Moisture Content
Accurately weigh and record the weight of an appropriately labeled, dry 20 ml glass
vial with airtight cap.
Transfer the tobacco (2g) into the pre-weighed 20 ml glass vial with airtight cap.
Accurately weigh and record the total weight of the capped vial with tobacco.
Place the samples in the oven at 110ºc with the caps loosened to allow the moisture to
be driven off from the tobacco.
After a minimum of 24 hours, remove the vials and tighten the caps immediately to
prevent re-absorption of moisture from the air. Keep the samples for 2 hours in a
desiccator for cooling.
Accurately weigh and record the total weight of the capped glass vial with tobacco
after heating and calculate the % Moisture content.
% Moisture content = weight of tobacco and glass vial – weight of tobacco and glass vial X 100
(Weight before heating) (Weight after heating) 2
45
8. Conclusions, recommendations and limitations
Substantive quantities of nitrosamines, BaP and heavy metals exist in most smokeless
tobacco products. Nicotine contents are very high in some and lower in others.
It is possible that those with lower nicotine content are targeted towards children; as
“starter” products. It is alarming that Red Tooth powders which are not marketed as
tobacco products also contain substantive quantities of nicotine.
These findings underscore the need for intensive efforts to prevent men women and
children from using any smokeless tobacco product.
It is recognized that the currently marketed tobacco products have not been subjected
to adequate regulation. All smokeless tobacco products should be subjected to review
based on procedures applicable to other consumer products intended for human
consumption. The incorporation of non-tobacco ingredients into smokeless tobacco
products should also be regulated, for their potential for harm independently or by
interaction with tobacco. Health warnings and labelling should reflect the known
adverse health effects of the smokeless tobacco product.
The findings in this report are subject to at least two limitations. First, the analysis did
not use a sales-weighted or representative sample of all brands or manufacturers; the
products tested were 20 leading products. Second, the findings for any specific brand
could have been affected by factors unique to the sample delivered to each city
surveyed, such as the retailers' duration and conditions of storage (e.g., humidity and
temperature) and manufacturing dates.
46
Bibliography
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health,
Smokeless Tobacco Fact Sheets, 2002.
5. Department of Health and Human Services. Reducing Tobacco Use: A Report of the
Surgeon General. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 2000.
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Determination of nicotine, pH, and
moisture content of six U.S. commercial moist snuff products — Florida, January–
February 1999. MMWR 1999; 48:398-401.
7. International Agency for Research on Cancer: Tobacco Habits Other Than Smoking:
betel, quid and areca-nut chewing; and some related nitrosamines. Vol. 37. Lyon, IARC
l985.
8. Hatsukami, D., Nelson, R., Jensen, J.: Smokeless Tobacco: Current Status and Future
Directions. British Journal of Addiction, Vol. 86 No. 5, 1991.
10. Gupta PC, Bhonsle RB, Mehta FS, Pindborg JJ. Mortality experience in relation to
tobacco chewing and smoking habits from a 10-year follow-up study in Ernakulam
District, Kerala. International Journal of Epidemiology, 1984, 13: 184-187.
11. Gupta PC, Mehta HC. Cohort study of all-cause mortality among tobacco users in
Mumbai, India. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2000, 78: 877-883.
12. West, R., Krafona, K.: Oral Tobacco: Prevalence, Health Risks, Dependence
Potential and Public Policy. British Journal of Addiction, Vol. 85 No. 9, 1990.
13. Bhonsle RB, Murti PR, Daftary DK, et al. Regional variations in oral submucous
fibrosis in India. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 15:225-229, 1987.
Henningfield JE, Fant RV, Tomar SL. Smokeless tobacco: an addicting drug. Advances in
Dental Research, 1997, 11: 330-5.
14. Tomar SL, Henningfield JE. Review of the evidence that pH is a determinant of
nicotine dosage from oral use of smokeless tobacco. Tobacco Control, 1997, 6: 219-225.
47
15. Brunnemann KD, Prokopczyk B, Djordjevic MV, Hoffmann D. Formation and
analysis of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 1996, 26:
121-137.
17. Food and Drug Administration. 21 CFR Part 801, et al. Regulations restricting the
sale and distribution of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco to protect children and
adolescents; final rule. Federal Register, 61 (168), 44396-45318, 1996.
18. Gupta PC, Ray SR. Tobacco and youth in the South East Asia Region. Indian
Journal of Cancer, 2002, 39: 3-34.
19. Djordjevic MV, Fan J, Bush LP, Brunnemann KD, Hoffmann [Link] of storage
conditions on levels of tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines and N-nitrosamino acids in U.S.
moist snuff. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1993, 41: 1790-1794.
22. Krishnamurthy S, Joshi S. Gender differences and low birth weight with maternal
smokeless tobacco use in pregnancy. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, 1993, 39(4): 253-
254.
23. Verma RC, Chansoriya M, Kaul KK. Effect of tobacco chewing by mothers on fetal
outcome. Indian Pediatrics, 1983, 20: 105-111.
24. Mehta AC, Shukla S. Tobacco and pregnancy. Journal of Obstetrics and
Gynaecology of India, 1990, 40: 156-160.
25. The Global Youth Tobacco Survey Collaborative Group. Tobacco use among
youth: a cross country comparison. Tobacco Control, 2002, 11: [Link]-1:
48
Annex-1: Details of smokeless tobacco brands tested:
place of
No PRODUCT NAME BATCH Date of purchase purchase
49
17 IPCO creamy snuff 8-Nov 2003 Gujarat
Regn.
No.AAEFA6022AXM001
JULY02
Regn.
No.AAEFA6022AXM001
FEB03
Regn.
No.AAEFA6022AXM001
JUNE03
50
Annex-2: Techniques used for the Measurements of chemical constituents of
Smokeless Tobacco
Packed Alkaloids:
Column (3% Nicotine
ov-101)
Thermal Capillary Alkaloids:
Ionization Column (BP- Nornicotine,
Detector 5) Anabasine,
(TID) 50 m X 0.22 Myosmine,
I.D. X 1.0 Anatabine.
um.
Electro Chemical EG&G Techniques: Heavy Metals:
Trace Analyser. Instruments Differential Nickel,
Polaragraphic & Princeton Pulse Anodic Lead,
Voltammetric Applied Stripping Cadmium,
Techniques. Research. Voltametric Chromium,
Model no. (dpasv) Arsenic,
303A/394/305 Differential Selenium.
Pulse
Cathodic
Stripping
Voltametric
(dpcsv)
Differential
Pulse square
Voltametric
(dpsv)
Differential Electrolyte: Nitrosamines:
Pulse 0.1 % Hcl N-nitrosonornicotine,
Polorography 4-(N-
(DPP) nitrosomethylamino)-
1-(3-pyridyl)-1-
butanone, N-
nitrosoanatabine,
N-nitrosoanabasine.
51
High Performance Hitachi, Liquid – C-18 column Sorbic Acid,
Liquid Merck : Liquid Phase Eugenol [2-Methoxy-
Chromatograph L-6220/L- 4-(2-propenyl)-
7400/L-7350 phenol]
Double beam Toshnival Wavelength: Ammonia
Ultra-Violet Instrument 420nm Nitrate.
Spectrophotometer (India) ltd. 550nm
Spectrascan
Model no:
2600
Digital Mercury Electronics Mercury
Analyser with Corporate of
Vapour India.
Generating system Model no:
MA 5840
MS 500.
pH meter Testronix pH value
Model no:
511
Titrimeteric Magnesium
Method Carbonate (MgCo3)
52
Annex-3: Calibration curves used for estimations:
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
V i e w p u b l i c a t i o n s t a t s