MEF 3.0: 5G Network Slicing & Orchestration
MEF 3.0: 5G Network Slicing & Orchestration
Emerson Moura
Distinguished Systems Engineer | Cisco
What is new in 5G?
2
5G Is Use-Case Driven
M assive M TC Critical M TC
TRAFFIC SAFETY
LOGISTICS
& CONTROL
LOW COST, LOW ENERGY Enhanced M obile ULTRA RELIABLE VERY LOW LATENCY
SMALL DATA VOLUMES MASSIVE NUMBERS VERY HIGH AVAILABILITY
Broadband
ENTERPRISE VR/AR
3
Technical Expectations of 5G
Strong subscriber
Spectral Area Traffic 0.1 - 10 authentication, user
×1 - ×3 Security privacy and network
Efficiency Capacity M bps / m 2
security
mill control
Automated guided
20 ms vehicle Remote handling with haptic feedback
Autonomous (e.g. remote mining)
driving
10 ms Robot
manufacturing
cell/roundtable
3 ms
Drive Control
1 ms (packaging, printing)
100 us Wind
turbine- High speed
internal motion control
2m 10 m 100 m 1 km 10 km 100 km
Communication distance
5
5G-Enabled Digitalization Revenues for ICT Players
Billions growth” 20
1130
55
73
• Agriculture
17
45 104 • Retail
66
119 • Financial Services
“Ramp up” 879 86
13
33 101 129 • Automotive
54
+181% 65 109
160 • Media &Entertainment
595 77
8
21 82
144
164
• Public transport
38
42
51
116 140 • Healthcare
54
259 81
108
206
233 • Public Safety
4
9
17
17
22
72 164
• Manufacturing
97 23 115
36
5 28 1
3
7
6
8
8
14
31
52 113
168
216 250
• Energy & Utilities
1
0
2 11
20 49
1
0 4
3
6
5 18
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Early
deployments 5G new Carrier Type, NR
Low latency
RAN Virtualization
M assive M IM O
M assive IoT
LTE Advanced
7
3GPP R15 – 2 Architecture Tracks for New Radio
3GPP Target
5G Enabled EPC Q4 17 NextGen Core
Option 7 Option 4
Xn Xn
LTE NR LTE NR
LTE
LTE NR/EPC
LTE NR/EPC NR/NXGC
8
5G RAN Network
5G C-RAN Higher Splits Lower Splits
3GPP
3GPP
tbd
• Multiple Functional Splits between RRH and BBU based on Transport and RAN efficiency tradeoff
• Different Functional Split has different KPIs
9
5G Transport – Dimensioning Examples
Radio gNB (v)EPC
(e)CPRI (e)S1
5G D-RAN
10-25G/sector < 1-10G
75µs < 10ms
Radio DU CU (v)EPC
(e)CPRI F1 (e)S1
eMBB with V-RAN
10-25G/sector < 1-10G 10-40G
75µs < 5ms < 10ms
Radio DU CU (v)EPC
› Example dimensions are traffic model based
(e)CPRI
C-MTC with V-RAN › All latency numbers in the slide are one way
< 30µs › Throughput is related to carrier bandwidth and MIMO layers
(indicative)
Source: Ericsson
11
MEF Work Areas
1. Transport for 5G
2. Network Slicing
3. Orchestrating 5G Services
13
Transport Evolution – Backhaul & Fronthaul
Considerations
Thousands Hundreds
# sites
Sites
Radio Evolved
Access Packet
Coordination Network Network
Synchronization
14
RAN Coordination Requirements
Fronthaul:
Optimal coordination with
C-RAN
2.5/5/10/25/(50) Gbps
co-located basebands
≤ 75 µs
Inter-site:
10/40 Gbps Optimal coordination with High capacity sites
dedicated fiber transport
Virtualized RAN **
≤ 23-30 µs
Distributed RAN
high performance transport
≤ 5 ms
Network wide coverage
Inter-site:
BH dimensioning* Loose coordination with
any transport
≤ 30 ms
*Capacity based on backhaul dimensioning **Optional
15
MEF 22.2 Terminology
Network
controller /
Remote Base gateway site
radio site Fronthaul Station site Backhaul
M idhaul Backhaul
Small cell
site
Small RBS
16
MEF 22 Phase 4 - Transport for 5G
CU/DU EBH
(BBU) MBH
MFH1 CU/DU
CORE
5G RRU (BBU) 5G RRU
MFH1 MBH
MFH2 MFH3 CU CU/DU
5G RRU (BBU)
5G RRU DU (BBU)
• Functional Splits can be in 1 or 2 stages (RRH-DU- • RRH, CU, DU, and Core distributed based on
CU) Services KPIs
• Three types of Fronthaul Networks • Multiple configurations can be co-located
• Each has its own KPIs • Transport Network can provide support for all
• MEF Ethernet Service Types – Mobile Fronthaul 1,2,3, Mobile Backhaul, Ethernet Backhaul
• Multiple Ethernet Service Types can co-exist
17
Network Slicing
18
Three Alternative Network Scenarios Modeled
1. One big network
2. Separate networks
3. Network slicing
This study was restricted to evaluating the impacts of network slicing in the core network only.
19
Benefits of Network Slicing
Overall Economic Impact of Network Slicing
Network slicing enables:
– New revenue generation
– Lower opex
– Greater capex efficiency
Result:
Significantly increased economic benefit
through new service launches.
Transport Network Slicing – System View
Slice
• Single S-Tag = EVC, Enhanced M EF tools (e.g., Trunk/OVC+,
EVC 1 Envelope+) to represent Slice ID
EVC 2
• Single S-Tag – Higher order bits=Slice ID, Lower order bits=EVC
EVC 3
• Double S-Tag – Inner Tag=EVC, Outer Tag=Slice ID
EVC 4
• PBB – S-Tag=EVC, B-Tag+I-Tag=Slice ID
• M PLS – S-Tag=EVC, M PLS Label=Slice ID
23
3GPP Network Slicing – E2E Service View
24
Orchestrating 5G Services
25
5G Network End-to-End Orchestration
Service
RF MFH MFH MBH EBH
CU
Network UE RRH DU (BBU) CORE
Resource
RAN
26
Data-Driven Orchestration
Physical Resources
Access/Mobility Core Cloud
Access Applications
(Access, Connectivity, Computing, Storage, ..)
M o b ile
F ix e d Cloud Infrastructure
Transport
27
Orchestrating 5G Services
Ensuring 5G-based services are orchestratable through SDN controllers as part of :
• Heterogeneous connectivity service
– Multi-Operator
– Multi-Technology
@ Multi-access with new 5G RAT, Fixed Wireless Broadband, Wi-Fi and FTTx
SDN based Transport with options for white label switches/routers
Local and Private Core Networks
User-Plane(s) for various use cases and deployment options (e.g. low latency)
29
MEF Services over 5G
3
MEF Services Over 5G – Why?
31
Advantages of MEF Services Over 5G
S ERVICE ON DEMAND
(TIME TO DELIVER = R EVENUE)
FAST ACTIVATION
O UT-OF-BAND MANAGEMENT
FOR SDN NETWORKS
32
MEF Services Over 5G
• MEF services
– Carrier Ethernet
– IP
• Network slicing allows customer separation for EVC end-to-end
• 5G adds native support for IP or Ethernet frames/service at the UE
Service Provider
End-to-End EVC
Emerson Moura
Distinguished Systems Engineer | Cisco