0% found this document useful (0 votes)
160 views5 pages

Roots of Filipino Character and Environment

The strengths and weaknesses of Filipino character are shaped by several factors including family environment, social environment, culture and language, history, and the educational system. Child rearing in Filipino families emphasizes high nurturance but also low independence and discipline, which can lead children to become passive and dependent on authority. Filipino culture was also influenced by colonial history and mentality. Finally, weaknesses in the educational system such as use of foreign textbooks and an authoritarian structure teach students to be passive and see things learned in school as unrelated to real life.

Uploaded by

Apostol Angelyca
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
160 views5 pages

Roots of Filipino Character and Environment

The strengths and weaknesses of Filipino character are shaped by several factors including family environment, social environment, culture and language, history, and the educational system. Child rearing in Filipino families emphasizes high nurturance but also low independence and discipline, which can lead children to become passive and dependent on authority. Filipino culture was also influenced by colonial history and mentality. Finally, weaknesses in the educational system such as use of foreign textbooks and an authoritarian structure teach students to be passive and see things learned in school as unrelated to real life.

Uploaded by

Apostol Angelyca
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

ROOTS OF THE FILIPINO CHARACTER

The strengths and weaknesses of the Filipino have their roots in many factors
such as:

1. The family & home environment.


2. The social environment.
3. Culture and language.
4. History.
5. The educational system.

[Link] family & home environment


The main components of the home environment:
 Child rearing practices
- Child rearing can be both difficult and rewarding at the same time. The goal of every
parent is to have your child grow up to be a respectable and resourceful adult in
society.

Child rearing in the Filipino family is characterized by:


 High nurturance
- The Filipino child grows up in an atmosphere of love and affection.
- Providing the children with the opportunity, means and support to pursue their
goals.

 Low independence training


- Over protection
- Some parents act on their own needs for power and use control and coercion to
ensure that they remain the dominant forces in their children’s lives.

Low discipline
 Attempts to maintain discipline come in the form of many “no’s” and “don’ts” and a
system of criticism to keep children in line.
 Subtle comparisons among siblings also are used by mothers to control their children.

Family relations
 In a large family where we are encouraged to get along with our siblings and other
relatives, we learn pakikipagkapwa-tao.
 In an authoritarian setting we learn respect for age and authority; at the same time, we
become passive and dependent authority.
 Children are taught to value family and to give it primary importance.

Family attitudes and orientation


 Family Orientation
- The Filipino’s family orientation may be attributed to the colonial times when the
hierarchical structure of family has been in prevalent place, where age and status
demand high levels of respect, and the good of the family takes precedence over
personal desires. This characteristic is still present despite modern times.

[Link] social environment


 The social environment of the Filipino is characterized by a feudal structure with great
gaps between the rich minority and the poor majority.

The social environment


The main components of the social environment are:
 Social structures
 Social systems
such as:
 Interpersonal religious
 Community interaction
3. Culture and language

Language and culture cannot be separated. Language is vital to understanding our unique
cultural perspectives. Language is a tool that is used to explore and experience our cultures and
the perspectives that are embedded in our cultures.

Filipino culture rewards such:


 Traits and corresponding behavioral patterns develop because they make one
more likable and enable life to proceed more easily.
 An openness to the outside which easily incorporates foreign elements without a
basic consciousness of our cultural core.

4. History
 WE are the product of our colonial history, which is regarded by many as the
culprit behind our lack of nationalism and our colonial mentality Colonialism
develop a mind-set in the Filipino which encouraged us to think of the colonial
power as superior and more powerful.

5. The Educational System


 Aside from the problems inherent in the use of a foreign language in our
educational system, the educational system leads to other problems for us a
people.

“They develop a mind-set that things learned in schools are not related to real
life.”
 The lack off suitable local textbooks and dependence on foreign textbooks,
particularly in the higher school levels.
Aside from the influences of the formal curriculum, there are the influences of the
“hidden curriculum” i.e., the values taught informally by the Philippine school system:
 Schools are highly authoritarian, with the teacher as the central focus.
 The Filipino student learns passivity and conformity
 The Filipino student in taught to be dependent on the teacher.
- Force Filipino students as well as their teachers to use school materials that
are irrelevant to the Philippine setting.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Colonialism has historically ingrained a mentality in Filipinos where colonial powers were viewed as superior, influencing a lack of strong nationalist sentiment and breeding a colonial mentality. This perspective has often led Filipinos to value foreign influence over indigenous practices and has been a barrier to fully embracing and revitalizing as well as asserting an independent national identity .

The socio-economic structure in the Philippines, with its pronounced gap between rich and poor, heavily influences community interactions. Social interactions are often stratified by class, with limited opportunities for the poor majority to engage with the affluent minority. The social systems that have developed from this structure tend to favor the elite, often leaving the majority with lesser opportunities for meaningful community participation and contributing to perpetuated class divisions .

Child-rearing practices in Filipino families emphasize high nurturance, where children grow up in an atmosphere of love and affection, providing them with support to pursue their goals. However, these practices also involve low independence training, as overprotection and parental control often lead children to remain dependent on authority. Discipline is maintained with many 'no’s' and indirect systems of criticism. This method tends to discourage independence and promotes passive acceptance of authority, impacting the development of self-reliance and critical thinking in individuals .

The family orientation prevalent in Filipino culture is shaped by colonial history, where hierarchical structures demanded respect for age and status. This historical background continues to reflect in modern Filipino families, where the good of the family is prioritized over individual desires. The enduring influence of colonial times is evident in the emphasis on family unity, respect for authority, and the maintaining of traditional roles .

The Philippine educational system tends to be authoritarian, with the teacher being the focal point, leading students to develop conformity and dependence rather than critical thinking. The use of foreign textbooks and curricula further disconnects education from real-life applicability. These practices result in a passive learning culture where students often perceive academic learning as irrelevant to their daily lives, preventing them from effectively applying knowledge in practical situations .

In Filipino families, authoritative settings teach children respect for age and authority, instilling discipline and maintaining family hierarchy. However, this authority can also breed passivity, as children become accustomed to complying with directives rather than engaging in independent thinking or questioning norms. This duality presents challenges in developing both respect and autonomy .

Language in Filipino society is an integral tool for understanding and experiencing cultural nuances. It allows individuals to explore cultural perspectives, deeply influencing identity and social interactions. Furthermore, the Filipino culture’s adaptability to incorporate foreign elements is partly due to this linguistic connectivity, enabling cultural exchanges and openness, albeit sometimes at the risk of overlooking the indigenous cultural core .

The feudal structure in the Philippines, characterized by a significant gap between the wealthy minority and the impoverished majority, perpetuates socio-economic disparities. This structure results in unequal access to resources and opportunities, reinforcing a cycle of poverty for the majority. The social systems that arise from this structure often prioritize and protect elite interests, limiting social mobility and maintaining the status quo .

The hidden curriculum in Philippine schools, which includes the values taught informally, unintentionally fosters dependency on authority by positioning teachers as ultimate figures of knowledge and authority. Students learn to value conformity and passivity, reinforcing a systemic dependency on external validation and authority figures rather than fostering independence and critical inquiry .

Reliance on foreign textbooks and materials in the Filipino educational system diminishes the relevance of local culture within academic settings, leading to a perceived inferiority of indigenous culture. Students can develop a foreign-oriented outlook, often valuing international perspectives over local traditions and undermining the cultivation of a strong cultural identity and a sense of national pride .

You might also like