0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views2 pages

Critique of 500 Days of Summer

The film 500 Days of Summer subverts expectations of a typical romantic comedy by telling the story out of sequence and showing that the relationship does not have a happy ending. It follows Tom and Summer's relationship over 500 days, utilizing stylistic techniques like changing aspect ratios and animation to reflect the characters' emotions. While Tom sees Summer as his soulmate, she does not want a serious relationship, and uses superficial traits to define her. The film offers a realistic portrayal of relationship complexity through flawed but human characters.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views2 pages

Critique of 500 Days of Summer

The film 500 Days of Summer subverts expectations of a typical romantic comedy by telling the story out of sequence and showing that the relationship does not have a happy ending. It follows Tom and Summer's relationship over 500 days, utilizing stylistic techniques like changing aspect ratios and animation to reflect the characters' emotions. While Tom sees Summer as his soulmate, she does not want a serious relationship, and uses superficial traits to define her. The film offers a realistic portrayal of relationship complexity through flawed but human characters.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

A critique on

500 Days of Summer (2009)


By Marc Webb

500 Days of Summer, directed by Marc Webb, isn’t your typical romantic comedy.
Right from the opening scene, the narrator openly tells you that this isn’t a love story,
subverting expectations set by the very first scene of the movie, where our protagonist,
Tom Hansen, a greeting-card writer, played by Joseph Gordon-Levitt, is sitting by the
bench with the titular Summer Finn, played by Zooey Deschanel. What follows is an hour-
and-a-half-long journey filled with ups and downs as we navigate Tom and Summer’s
"relationship". ultimately ending the same way it started: with the two of them sitting on
the same park bench and Summer being married to a different person, but not the person
we have seen her with throughout the film.

The actual plot of the story starts with Tom getting dumped by his then girlfriend,
Summer. The plot progresses through retellings of the 500 days they spent together. The
retellings are out of sequence, frequently bouncing around days, which can come off as
confusing, but all the scenes eventually have a payoff. One of the first scenes of the film
is a great example of this. It was confusing at first because it shows Tom and Summer
breaking up, but in the scene prior, it shows the two of them holding hands with a ring on
Summer’s finger. But a detail that I realized upon second viewing is that we only ever see
Summer’s hand in the scene, Tom’s hand is covered by Summer's, which hints at the
ending of the movie, where Summer is engaged to another man.

Another aspect of the film that I love is the stylization. In some scenes, the aspect ratio
will change, this is done when the scene doesn’t fit the progression of the story or when
the narrator tells us something, so a different aspect ratio is used so we know that this is
separate from the flow of the story. The title cards used when showing the 500 days are
also a unique touch. The title card is composed of a tree on the left and the day number
on the right, and the tree is either blooming, full of life, or wilting to match the mood of the
scene. Animation is also present in the movie but is very rarely used. It’s only used to
drive home the emotions that a character feels in a scene. The scene when Tom
supposedly beds Summer is followed by a choreographed dance number filled with
people and animation, emphasizing how happy he is, while the scene after Tom sees
Summer’s engagement ring is empty and Tom is all alone in a dark street with the world
getting animated in grayscale and eventually being erased. I love this because this is
what Tom feels like, and the animation helps us understand exactly how happy or sad he
is.

OBCEMEA, CARL ANGELO R. | | SHSSTEM 11-01


But the two main characters are really what make the story. This is a story about Tom,
and at first glance, the audience would very likely sympathize with him, and why wouldn’t
we? He is the typical nice guy, a hopeless romantic who believes in the idea of destiny or
"the one." But like most nice guys in film, he is only nice because of the idea of a reward,
and in this case the reward is a relationship with Summer, which she very openly
discusses that she doesn’t want. Even after this, Tom still forces Summer into his idea of
"the one," being more in love with the idea of her than the actual person. A good example
of this is when the same montage of Summer appears twice in the film. The first is set in
a day where they’re still together, but the way he describes it will drastically change from
loving Summer’s quirky features to "I hate her crooked teeth, I hate her 1960s haircut, I
hate her knobby knees, I hate her cockroach-shaped splotch on her neck, I hate the way
she smacks her lips before she talks, and I hate the way she sounds when she laughs."
His attraction is often superficial and surface-level, frequently looking at their similarities,
her interests, or her appearance and not focusing on who she is as a person. But a very
big part that someone has to understand when watching this movie is that it is narrated
by our protagonist, Tom, which explains the out of sequence nature of the story.

Tom isn’t the only flawed character; the antagonist of the movie also has her fair share of
faults. Summer Finn is a bland and boring love interest. She isn’t fleshed out, and we
don’t really get to know much about her, aside from the fact that her parents aren’t
together, which explains her attitude towards love. Also, the breakup at the beginning and
the twist at the end, which eventually had a payoff, came out of nowhere. To add on,
Zooey Deschanel’s performance is very one-dimensional, with a monotone voice and an
unenthusiastic tone. But this may very well be intentional; after all, this is a story about
Tom, and he is narrating; what we may be seeing is only a part of Summer and what he
sees in her.

Though it has its flaws, 500 Days of Summer is a tremendous subversion of the
traditional rom-com, offering a realistic view on relationships, their complexity, and how
they’re not just as simple as both of you liking the Smiths. The stylistic choices add to its
appeal and are a part of why it is as great as it is. Though the gut-wrenching dialogue
Tom and Summer share at the end of the film may have tugged at more than a few
heartstrings, the ending scene with Tom and Autumn gives us a glimmer of hope that
even though Summer has ended, a new season will always come and life will always go
on.

OBCEMEA, CARL ANGELO R. | | SHSSTEM 11-01

Common questions

Powered by AI

The film subverts traditional romantic comedy tropes primarily by being upfront about not being a love story, which is declared in the opening scene itself . It challenges expectations by presenting a non-linear narrative structure that begins with a breakup rather than culminating with a romantic union. Furthermore, it explores the one-sided perception of love from Tom's perspective, emphasizing his idealization of Summer rather than a mutual romantic connection . The film's conclusion with the character Autumn rather than a reconciliation underscores the theme that life goes on beyond failed relationships, steering away from a typical romantic comedy resolution .

Tom's narration heavily influences the audience's perception of the story and characters by framing events from his biased perspective. His role as an unreliable narrator colors the portrayal of Summer and their relationship, often reflecting more on his feelings and frustrations rather than Summer's reality . This subjective storytelling makes the audience initially sympathize with Tom, overlooking his flaws until they are revealed through repetition and contrast in scenes . The narration encourages viewers to critically engage with the story, recognizing the impact of subjective perspective on understanding relationships .

The combination of narrative and stylistic elements in "500 Days of Summer" effectively conveys the film's message on the complexity and unpredictability of relationships. The non-linear narrative structure allows for a more authentic depiction of how people remember and process past relationships, focusing on emotional significance rather than chronology . Stylistic elements, such as changes in aspect ratio and the use of animation, accentuate the emotional tone of scenes and highlight Tom's subjective experience, reinforcing the film's exploration of how personal perceptions can distort the reality of relationships . This blend of narrative and style conveys that relationships are multifaceted and that personal growth often comes through recognizing and overcoming one's flawed perceptions .

The non-linear narrative structure reflects Tom's idealized and fragmented perception of love. By presenting events out of sequence, the film mirrors the way memories often focus on highlights, regrets, or perceived betrayals, rather than a coherent story . This structure allows the audience to see how Tom's infatuation is more centered on his fantasies about Summer rather than who she truly is . His fixation on predestined love blinds him to Summer's clear expressions of her own feelings and intentions, illustrating his superficial understanding of relationships as influenced by clichés and misconceptions .

Tom's character flaws, such as his romantic idealism and naivety, are central to the film's exploration of romantic relationships. He exemplifies the "nice guy" archetype who believes in destiny and "the one" without understanding the complexities of real human connections . His superficial attraction to Summer, based on quirks and similarities rather than seeing her as a complete person, highlights the discrepancies between fantasy and reality in relationships. The movie critiques Tom's pursuit of a romantic ideal at the expense of genuine understanding, framing his journey as one of personal growth rather than romantic success .

The ending scene with Autumn recontextualizes the entire narrative by underscoring the theme of rebirth and continuity in life and relationships. It signifies the conclusion of Tom's emotionally taxing experience with Summer and his readiness to embrace new possibilities, illustrating the cyclical nature of romantic and personal growth . This scene extends the film's exploration beyond just the end of a relationship to a broader perspective on life's ongoing journey, suggesting that though one chapter closes, another promising opportunity awaits, embodying optimism and resilience .

Summer plays a crucial role in challenging Tom's understanding of love by embodying a more realistic and independent perspective on relationships. Her straightforward communication about not wanting a committed relationship contrasts with Tom's delusions of fated romance . Summer's character challenges Tom's idealism and forces him to confront the difference between reality and his preconceived notions about romance. Her actions and decisions, including marrying someone else, ultimately serve as a harsh yet necessary wake-up call for Tom to reevaluate his approach to relationships and his unrealistic expectations .

Summer's portrayal challenges traditional female roles in romantic comedies by subverting expectations of a love interest fixated on romance. Instead, she represents a self-aware character with her own agency, openly expressing her reluctance for commitment and dispelling Tom's romantic illusions . Unlike conventional portrayals set on fulfilling male characters' fantasies, Summer disrupts narrative conventions by asserting her independence and complexity, ultimately influencing Tom's journey rather than conforming to his desires. This challenges viewers to reconsider typical gender dynamics and recognize the importance of diverse female characterizations in film .

The stylistic choices in "500 Days of Summer" serve to emphasize the emotional states of the protagonist, Tom. Animation is employed sparingly to drive home Tom's emotions, as seen in the choreographed dance number representing his joy . Aspect ratio changes occur to distinguish scenes that deviate from the main narrative flow or when the narrator shares insights, helping viewers differentiate these moments from the chronological storyline . These techniques enrich the storytelling by allowing the audience to experience the emotional highs and lows alongside Tom, despite the film's non-linear progression.

The film strategically uses cinematic techniques like animation, aspect ratio shifts, and title cards to underscore Tom's emotional journey and key thematic elements. Animation highlights Tom's shift in emotions, with vibrant sequences showing his euphoria and grayscale hints at his despair . Title cards with changing tree imagery reflect the varying stages of Tom's relationship with Summer, visually representing growth, decline, and transition . Aspect ratio changes occur when the narrative diverges from the main storyline, indicating moments of emotional or narrative significance. These techniques enhance the viewer's understanding of Tom's personal development from romantic idealism to a more nuanced understanding of love and self .

You might also like