0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views4 pages

Schülernoten und Leistungsbewertung

The document appears to be report cards or grades for multiple students. It includes grades in various subjects on a scale of 0-2, with 2 being the highest. It then calculates a total grade for each student out of 46 possible points and provides their grade as a percentage. The grades range widely from 8% to 100% among the different students.

Uploaded by

Stefan Kranz
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as ODS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views4 pages

Schülernoten und Leistungsbewertung

The document appears to be report cards or grades for multiple students. It includes grades in various subjects on a scale of 0-2, with 2 being the highest. It then calculates a total grade for each student out of 46 possible points and provides their grade as a percentage. The grades range widely from 8% to 100% among the different students.

Uploaded by

Stefan Kranz
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as ODS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

noten

0% ungenügend
24% mangelhaft
45% noch ausreichend
52% ausreichend
58% voll ausreichend
62% noch befriedigend
68% befriedigend
73% voll befriedigend
78% noch gut
82% gut
88% voll gut
93% noch sehr gut
97% sehr gut
100.00% voll sehr gut

Seite 1
5C

Mut verl

Wunsch
Ort/Dat

bedroht

Satzanf
Gundel

gefasst
Schrift
Unters

befreit
Angst
Grußf

Übpr

rettet

extra
stolz
Schl

Verl
Einl
Abs
Anr

R/Z
Spr

%

V

O
Vorname Name
Mann/
Muster Frau 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 26 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 2 46 100%
Chehab Ali 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 2 0 0 14 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 3 2 26 57%
Dokic Daniel 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 2 1 23 2 2 2 0 2 2 1 1 1 1 4 0 2 31 67%
Driessen Nick 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 03 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 13 28%
Entrup Lena 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 06 2 2 2 0 2 2 1 2 2 2 4 2 2 33 72%
Flöter Leon 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 04 2 2 2 0 2 0 0 2 1 1 0 4 1 24 52%
Gebauer Lilli 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 1 03 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 4 2 1 2 25 54%
Halle Stefan 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 03 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 4 1 14 30%
Hüls Maike 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 26 2 0 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 40 87%
Jordan Maureen 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 06 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 4 1 34 74%
Jüngling Christian 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 4 0 0 13 28%
Klingenberg Jonna 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 4 2 23 50%
Krampe Chiara 1 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 26 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 2 2 2 4 2 5 31 67%
Krawietz Marco 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 13 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 0 0 17 37%
Langhammer Melvin 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 13 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 3 3 2 24 52%
Kock Mike Stef 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 06 2 2 2 0 2 0 1 2 2 2 4 0 1 25 54%
Neufeld Delia 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 3 2 17 37%
Rademacher Eric 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 0 2 15 33%
Rajcic Kimberly 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 13 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 21 46%
Ramirez MoraMiguel 0 4 4 8 17%
Samorezov Arthur 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 4 3 3 1 24 52%
Sander Niklas 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 2 6 4 1 2 27 59%
Schreihans Calvin 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 4 1 3 2 15 33%
Thavanesan Nadja 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 3 4 0 2 2 21 46%
Trogemann Selina 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 0 1 1 1 3 2 2 2 29 63%
Wende Lisa 0 4 4 8 17%
Wesselmann Lennart 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 4 0 2 22 48%
Wiens David 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 2 2 1 16 35%
Wohnrade Lina 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 0 1 1 1 2 2 1 5 2 1 2 33 72%
Zamojski Julita 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 3 3 n.b. 1 15 39%
0.9 1.0 0.7 0.9 0.3 0.4 1.4 0.7 0.8 0.5 0.6 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.3 0.8 0.5 0.5 1.3 1.4 1.3 3.7 2.8 2.1 1.5 2.8 22 49%
1 2 3 4 5 6 1 1- 2+ 2 2- 3+ 3 3- 4+ 4 4- 5 6 Schnitt
0 1 6 11 10 1 29 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 3 1 6 4 10 1 4.14

Seite 2
5C

Quot A

Quot R
Wörter
Note

Bem

A-F

R-F
voll sehr gut 1 0.0% 0.0%
ausreichend 11 16 330 3.3% 4.8%
noch befriedigend 2 28 224 0.9% 12.5%
mangelhaft 22 17 191 12% 8.9%
befriedigend 1 12 183 0.5% 6.6%
ausreichend 20 2 155 13% 1.3%
ausreichend 3 11 180 1.7% 6.1%
mangelhaft 12 2 130 9.2% 1.5%
gut 11 2 181 6.1% 1.1%
voll befriedigend 13 6 286 4.5% 2.1%
mangelhaft 2 17 104 1.9% 16.3%
noch ausreichend 7.5 3 132 5.7% 2.3%
noch befriedigend 32 3 464 6.9% 0.6%
mangelhaft 7 23 172 4.1% 13.4%
ausreichend 4 3 87 4.6% 3.4%
ausreichend 2 21 132 1.5% 15.9%
mangelhaft 8 4 141 5.7% 2.8%
mangelhaft 6 23 165 3.6% 13.9%
noch ausreichend 5 12 183 2.7% 6.6%
ungenügend 20 0.0% 0.0%
ausreichend 10 7 237 4.2% 3.0%
voll ausreichend 3 20 250 1.2% 8.0%
mangelhaft 11 6 141 7.8% 4.3%
noch ausreichend 4 25 198 2.0% 12.6%
noch befriedigend 24 20 330 7.3% 6.1%
mangelhaftThema verfehlt! 26 0.0% 0.0%
noch ausreichend 3 28 183 1.6% 15.3%
mangelhaft 17 14 247 6.9% 5.7%
befriedigend 20 29 357 5.6% 8.1%
mangelhaft 5 154 3.2% 0.0%
9.83 13.6 193 4.4% 6.3%

Seite 3
Rechtschreibung

typische Fehler
0.00% 4
2.50% 3 Zahlen ausschreiben
5.00% 2 Zeichensetzung der wörtlichen Rede
7.50% 1 Satzenden (Punkte)
10.00% 0 „Als-Krankheit“
„sagte-Krankheit“
„dann-Krankheit“
0.00% 3 „sprach-Krankheit“
3.00% 2
6.00% 1
9.00% 0

0.0% 5
2.0% 4
4.0% 3
6.0% 2
8.0% 1
10.0% 0

0.0% 5
1.5% 4
3.0% 3
4.5% 2
6.0% 1
7.5% 0

Seite 4

You might also like