The Evolution of Corporate Governance and Its Impact on Contemporary Management

Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI)

The Evolution of Corporate Governance and Its Impact on Contemporary

P. Shafiz Shahrani1, Radzali Hassan2, Louis Adaikalam3

1
Dr., International Institute of Applied Science of Swiss School of Management, Switzerland
2
Dr., International Institute of Applied Science of Swiss School of Management, Switzerland
3
Dr., International Institute of Applied Science of Swiss School of Management, Switzerland

Abstract :

Corporate governance is of great interest to companies and organizations at the regional and international levels,
especially after the current economic crises that have led to a crisis of confidence in economic information.
Hence, governance has become a fertile field for research and study. And the modern management represented
in the economy and accounting to take advantage of its advantages and avoid its disadvantages, as the research
helps in eliminating conflict and achieving harmony and balance between all the company’s departments, in
addition to tightening control over the company’s management to prevent it from abusing its powers and
providing transparency by using internal and external governance mechanisms. The research selects and
analyses relevant scientific research to provide proposals that are compatible with the nature of the company,
making it implement governance mechanisms. The research also found a close and positive correlation between
governance mechanisms and the level of quality in the company's various departments.

Keywords: Governance, Contemporary Management, Economics, Corporate Governance, Finance.

INTRODUCTION :

Almost all modern management operations, including as risk management, logistics management, finance, and
human resource management, are now combined with the concept of modern management. The term appears to
have gained in popularity during the last 25 years, according to popular belief. The concept of management, on
the other hand, has been around for a long time. It is reasonable to infer that the phenomena of management has
existed in human consciousness from the dawn of time. Management dates back to the time when the first people
opted to live in a clan or group [1]. Effective hunting and foraging are critical to their existence, and these tasks
necessitate both individual and group effort. Simultaneously, the company's management was taken over by a
powerful individual capable of leading the other members of the group, with the goal of performing a good job
for the other members of the group. This is how the first group of managers came into existence [2]. With the
advancement of time, society, and technology, more complex tasks, and the need to work in larger groups, it is
becoming increasingly important to identify people as workers and managers in areas where manufacturing
processes or services are inextricably linked to machines, equipment, and methods of implementation.

Management is the name given to this field, and it is not an exaggeration to say that it is the most comprehensive
field of modern science. Management is a broad term that can be applied to almost any aspect of life. Because of
its variety and scope, several management definitions have emerged over time.

The global corporate scandal resulted in the demise of once-famous corporations like Enron and WorldCom. It
emphasised the importance of monitoring management quality and sparked global calls for better governance
structures. The fundamental fault of these corporate failures, according to auditors and financial economists, is
systemic flaws in the management standards and governance processes that generate financial information [3].
Most governments throughout the world have implemented new best governance standards to match managers'
incentives with the goal of increasing shareholder wealth in order to prevent future business failures. As a result,
an efficient governance mechanism should be able to synchronise enterprise and investment management
decisions with those of shareholders.

3741
 The Evolution of Corporate Governance and Its Impact on Contemporary Management

Despite the implementation of good governance rules in a number of worldwide firms and their continuous
updates, the results obtained can be deemed inadequate because new incidents of governance malpractice are
threatening the survival of some organisations in all sectors of the economy [4].

Corporate governance is a method of lowering agency costs by resolving conflicts of interest between managers
and shareholders. Because modern firms' separation of ownership and control provides managers a privileged
position, allowing them to freely make decisions that meet or anchor the company's value maximisation goals [5],
conflicts are almost inevitable. This permits executives to exploit their power over the corporation to pursue
personal objectives at the expense of stakeholders. In this aspect, management might have an impact on reported
earnings by making accounting and management decisions or making operational decisions on its own. Accrual
accounting [6] contains one of these discretionary options to influence reported profitability.

Reserves are an especially valuable manipulative accounting technique since they are part of the outcomes that
aren't represented in current cash flows, and their formation provides management a lot of leeway. All stakeholders
can use the financial report as a mirror to observe the company's performance [7]. The trustworthiness of investors
and other stakeholders in the company's investment decisions determines the quality of these reports. Managers
are unlikely to alter their earnings under the regulatory system to imply that they are good managers because
financial statements represent performance and management abilities. When manager compensation (such as
options and stocks) is connected to firm performance, this radical accounting practise becomes even more
pronounced. Revenue management has the potential to negatively impact corporate performance and potentially
erode shareholder wealth [8]. The conflict of interest between management and shareholders is the incentive for
distorting firm performance.

In both rich and emerging countries, research on the relationship between corporate governance and company
success is outstanding. It also looked at the relationship between governance structures, financial reporting quality,
and opportunistic accounting. Many studies have found that excellent governance procedures can have an impact
on managers' discretionary behaviour.

Although the degree and direction of these links varies by researcher and research topic, the majority of these data
show that corporate governance has an impact on business performance and results management. However, the
confluence of these two events creates a complex situation that has to be investigated further. If corporate
governance processes affect results management and firm performance, the impact on reported performance can
be regarded as "at least partly purely cosmetic." As a result, discretionary clauses must not affect these important
performance measures in order to establish the true impact of corporate governance on company performance [9].
Because it facilitates comparison between the two, this gives us a peek of the real impact of governance variables
on pre-management (real) and management (adjustment) performance.

CONTEMPORARY MANAGEMENT THEORIES :

Are classical management ideas still relevant in today's markets now that we have a better grasp of them? Classic
ideas may always be the foundation if they adhere to theoretical concepts closely, but they must add numerous
contemporary features. See Figure 1 [10] for some of the current elements altering the management landscape:

 Talent
 Diversity
 Globalization
 Technology
 Ethics
 Careers

3742
 The Evolution of Corporate Governance and Its Impact on Contemporary Management

Talent

Careers Diversity

Contemporary
Management

Ethics Globalization

Technology

Figure 1: Contemporary Management Factors

We are going to touch on three of the most important factors which are technology, diversity, and globalization
[11].

3.1 Technology :

Many organisations are being transformed nowadays, and a variety of technology concepts are being brought to
the forefront [12]. In today's industry, computer technology is the most significant advancement in terms of
making work easier and more efficient. As modern technology spreads over the globe, this has had a major impact
globally. This raises the question of whether classical theories are obsolete in this new period of contemporary
technology management, given the ever-expanding world of technology. The answer can be found in a comparison
and contrast of traditional and current styles.

Take a bureaucratic approach. The hierarchical organisation is, of course, still divided into labour. A manager
who gives his employees expert authority in the form of knowledge, on the other hand, might be equated with
technological advancement. Employees can, in essence, utilise smartphones or tablets to obtain solutions to
organisational concerns as fast and effectively as a boss or manager. What is the difference between a manager
and an employee in this notion, in its most extreme form, except from the title? Technology has the potential to
transform bureaucratic models into bureaucratic matrices, allowing for increased specialisation in larger
enterprises. The president of a university, for example, is the institution's leader, but he also has to serve in other
administrative capacities (such as information technology, human resources, student affairs, etc.).

Technology forces society to reconsider and develop bureaucracy and scientific management theory, as well as
advanced behavioural and interpersonal connection theories. Modern companies will become more effective as a
result of decentralisation and human coordination. According to McGill University professor Jay Conger, the
progress of new technology necessitates managers' ability to coordinate in geographically dispersed organisations,
and transformation necessitates not only more, but also innovative forms of leadership and management [13]. In
the end, a more comprehensive strategy than a methodical approach may be required. Given the fact that
technological advancement has not slowed.

2.2 Diversity :

In recent years, the term "diversity" has gained popularity. The diversity of management focuses on employees in
the organisation who have different backgrounds and needs [14]. This is referred to as "diversity management."
In many respects, diversity management is similar to behaviour management in that it strives to fully focus on the
needs of the organization's personnel.

3743
 The Evolution of Corporate Governance and Its Impact on Contemporary Management

After all, it's critical to reconsider what diversity is and how it manifests itself in many elements of a business. In
order for a modern organisation to function well, it must employ more complex methodologies to develop a
behavioural model that accounts for the organization's numerous inconsistencies. In essence, it entails more than
simply listening to employees' viewpoints. It pays attention to employees' opinions depending on their individual
demands.

2.3 Globalization :

The term "globalisation" became more popular after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. Companies and businesses
have decided to expand into new global markets as open borders and technology advancements have increased.
However, as the world progressively enters the twenty-first century, several concerning patterns in the global
economy have developed. A study published in 2018 by the Global Risk Perception Survey (GRPS) identified
four main changes in the global and external environment [15]:

 Persistent inequality and unfairness

There is a pessimistic view that hierarchical structures will not survive in today's high-impact environment [16].
This might be a test of bureaucracy and scientific models.

This possibility, though, may be realised. If a top-down hierarchy is no longer necessary in a globalised economy,
what about hierarchies that go outward rather than upward? It is irresponsible to overlook all external variables
that affect organisations in the global market while considering the organisational environment. The following are
some of these motivations [17]:

 Economic Environment
 Legal-Political Environment
 Technological Environment
 Socio-Cultural Environment
 Natural Environment

These abilities are positioned outside of the core organisation, and hence outside of the organization's control.
Although the Institute has no control over power, it can effectively adjust policy in order to keep ahead of dynamic
power. A constant tug of war is still required to guarantee that the corporation fulfils its responsibilities to sustain
these dynamic dynamics in the global market in order to nurture a healthy organisational and social perspective.

MANAGERS AND CONTEMPORARY MANAGEMENT :

Those who carry out management policies and functions in practise are inseparable in the realm of management.
Managers appear to be the consequence of management, but this is not the case because people who perform these
types of activities operate before management phenomena are defined and described. A person who directs a
group of individuals and organises their operations many years before the general management phenomena [18]
is known as the initial manager. On the one hand, managers appear to accomplish management duties with great
clarity, while managers themselves frequently struggle to define tasks accurately in their daily lives.

Managers' roles are divided into five categories by management: prospecting and planning, organising, guiding
subordinates, coordinating and guiding diverse firm activities, so that the entire organisation works toward the
same goal. Furthermore, some academics categorise managers' responsibilities into five categories: goal-setting,
organisation, motivation and communication, work-product measurement, and staff development. [19].

Although there are some parallels, there are also some variances between the two lists. The first five categories
are more objective, whereas the last five are more compassionate. However, as shown in Figure 2 [20], it can be
considered that these two lists best describe the tasks and responsibilities of executives.

3744
 The Evolution of Corporate Governance and Its Impact on Contemporary Management

Figure 2: Manager Functions

Management science includes the above-mentioned roles as well as the roles allocated to managers. This does not
rule out the possibility of them being changed, enlarged, or replaced by other elements [21]. These are the core
characteristics and functions, the work of senior managers, and the attributes that should be present at the very
least. Not only has technology offered new difficulties to managers in terms of function and personality, but so
have the social, dynamic economic framework circumstances and the constant further growth of greater
globalisation. New technologies, shifting communication channels, and more consumer engagement, for example,
have resulted in a set of traits that modern managers should possess, as well as new needs, such as a basic
awareness of how modern technologies function. Table 1 [22] shows how the manager's surroundings has altered.

3745
 The Evolution of Corporate Governance and Its Impact on Contemporary Management

Table 1: Mangers Attitude Changes

GOVERNANCE :

A company's direction and control are guided by a set of rules, procedures, and processes known as corporate
governance. Corporate governance is defined as the process of reconciling the interests of a company's various
stakeholders, including senior management, customers, suppliers, financiers, the government, and the community
[23].

Because corporate governance also serves as a framework for attaining firm objectives, it encompasses nearly
every aspect of management, from action plans and internal controls to performance measurement and disclosure
of company information [24].

The set of rules, procedures, policies, and resolutions that are used to direct business behaviour is referred to as
governance. Authorized advisors and stockholders are key stakeholders who influence governance indirectly but
are not instances of governance [25]. The board of directors is an important part of corporate governance, and its
decisions can have a big impact on stock prices.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND ITS IMPORTANCE :

Investors value corporate governance because it demonstrates social responsibility and business integrity.
Corporate governance aids in the development of trust among investors and the general public. As a result,
corporate governance helps to promote financial sustainability by providing market participants with an
investment opportunity [26].

Corporate governance systems differ in their inner workings, but the business practises they involve are usually
more constant. Corporate governance refers to how and why a corporation is run [27]. To be clear, corporate
governance affects every area of a company, from communication to leadership and strategic decision-making,
but it is principally concerned with the board of directors, how they manage the business, and how they run it. As
a result, it should include the following [28]:

3746
 The Evolution of Corporate Governance and Its Impact on Contemporary Management

 The company’s performance and the performance of the board

This checklist gives you a bird's eye view of company management techniques and how they impact the bottom
line. Some corporations provide a governance framework that describes the board of directors' aims and
responsibilities, as well as their interaction with the corporate governance infrastructure, to assist organisations in
managing corporate governance [29]. However, just putting in place a corporate governance framework does not
guarantee success.

The majority of successful corporate governance examples have one thing in common: they are based on
transparency, accountability, and trust. These three terms keep reappearing in the corporate governance
conversation. Whether it's a family business, a charitable organisation, or a publicly listed corporation, they're
extremely valuable [30]. This is one of the reasons why many professionals consider corporate governance to be
a top responsibility. Above all, corporate governance's responsibility in modern businesses is to communicate
these key concepts to shareholders, stakeholders, and the general public.

In modern firms, the role of corporate governance is restricted to the company's ability to display its beneficial
features. Companies are more likely to take responsibility for their acts as a result of all their contradictory intents,
and hence more willing to remove themselves from those who disagree.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN CONTEMPORARY MANAGEMENT :

The rules, policies, and process systems on which an enterprise runs are referred to as corporate governance in
today's management environment. In this approach, a company's corporate governance model distributes rights
and responsibilities among all members in the organisation [31].

Governance guarantees that everyone in the business follows a fair and transparent decision-making process, and
that all stakeholders' interests (shareholders, executives, employees, suppliers, customers, and so on) are protected.

The term "corporate governance" refers to the process through which investors ensure that their investments
provide sufficient profits. In making effective strategic decisions, corporate governance clearly divides the roles
of firm owners (shareholders) and managers (senior management) [32].

The importance of corporate governance has grown in prominence as a result of today's market economy and
globalisation. This is due to the fact that governance is a crucial tool for ensuring transparency and safeguarding
the interests of all shareholders, large and small.

There are nine positive effects of a good corporate governance system in companies in the modern management
context [33]:

i. Ensures that the management of a company considers the best interests of everyone;
ii. Helps companies deliver long-term corporate success and economic growth;
iii. Maintains the confidence of investors and as consequence companies raise capital efficiently and
effectively;
iv. Has a positive impact on the price of shares as it improves the trust in the market;
v. Improves control over management and information systems (such as security or risk management)
vi. Gives guidance to the owners and managers about what are the goals strategy of the company;
vii. Minimizes wastages, corruption, risks, and mismanagement;
viii. Helps to create a strong brand reputation and
ix. Most importantly – it makes companies more resilient.

3747
 The Evolution of Corporate Governance and Its Impact on Contemporary Management

There are numerous corporate governance models in use around the world, but none is more universal. The optimal
model for a firm is determined by the economic, legal, political, and social environment, as well as the goals,
motives, mission, and business setting. However, two major governance models exist: Anglo-American corporate
governance and continental European corporate governance [34].

A company can be structured in a variety of ways, but the most common structure includes shareholders, a board
of directors, management, and employees. The corporate governance structure establishes how the organization's
rights and obligations are distributed, as well as decision-making norms and procedures. Typically, the board of
directors makes decisions about the company's future development.

The board of directors, like the directors, is not made equal. In fact, they encounter a variety of obstacles, and
their structures are influenced by a variety of circumstances. Some factors have an impact on the board's
fundamentals, such as: [35]:

i. The legal and regulatory obligations of the relevant geography - which, depending on the country in
which the organisation is headquartered, can range from a highly regulated environment that dictates
board composition and responsibilities to no applicable laws at all.
ii. The company's ownership structure – which can range from a business closely held by a few family
members who see each other on a daily basis to one with numerous, geographically dispersed distant
family members to the inclusion of other investors, whether through private equity or publicly traded
stock.
iii. Owners, other interested family members (such as the owners' anticipated heirs), customers, and insurers
all have expectations and interests to consider.
iv. The size, resources, maturity, culture, and amount of complexity of the company.

Companies with a robust corporate governance framework and an experienced board of directors who think about
growth and sustainability will, in the end, be more capable of short- and long-term success.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC MARKETS :

The growing globalisation of capital markets and the liberalisation of international trade appear to have created
an environment in which corporate governance distinctions are less pronounced. This centralised ownership
model, for example, is linked to a strong acknowledgment of shareholder rights and the significance of boosting
corporate transparency. Strong supervisory incentives linked to centralised human responsibility are increasingly
valued in external systems [36]. In the United Kingdom and the United States, institutional investors and pension
funds have gotten more involved in the corporate governance of companies in which they have major stakes. To
provide leverage for closed enterprises, venture capital and second-tier markets have emerged [37].

The globalisation of financial and economic markets is primarily responsible for the forces of convergence in the
two types of systems. Companies are increasingly implementing corporate governance structures that international
investors appear to value. Companies, particularly major multinational corporations, are increasingly embracing
current system best practises to increase business efficiency and attract outside financing. Furthermore,
international investors' interests and large corporations' cash needs for global expansion have pushed numerous
companies to pursue listings on foreign stock exchanges. Corporate governance has been significantly impacted
by this shift in funding strategies. When raising financing through overseas stock exchanges, shareholders are
more concerned with the company's risks, as opposed to banks, which are more worried with the danger of default
[38]. As a result, overseas investors are becoming more important as a source of financing for publicly traded
enterprises. As a result, many internal corporate governance systems must promote transparency and safeguard
minority owners.

Because of the economic issues that arise from the separation of ownership and control, a corporate governance
structure is needed to increase management accountability and motivate managers to maximise profits rather than
pursue their personal objectives [39]. Furthermore, a sound corporate governance system must safeguard small
shareholders from rental income from management or major shareholders while also promoting effective
stakeholder investment. The means of achieving this goal differs from country to country, and even within a
country's industrial sector. To solve these regulatory concerns, each country has developed unique capital market
methods and finance agreements, legal and regulatory frameworks, and other procedures over time. This is
demonstrated by the present variations in corporate governance frameworks in OECD countries.

3748
 The Evolution of Corporate Governance and Its Impact on Contemporary Management

Although the impact of recent events is difficult to foresee, governance and funding models appear to be
convergent in general, with external systems adopting internal system traits and vice versa. However, given the
degree of divergence across systems shaped by history and based in cultural, historical, and legal differences,
comprehensive integration appears to be unattainable [40]. Furthermore, these many corporate governance
systems converge from several angles. As a result, the techniques utilised to achieve improvements, as well as the
policy actions required, differ.

The previous example demonstrates how ownership and control models, as well as corporate governance
frameworks, differ from one country to the next. Finally, whether these various corporate governance standards,
particularly differences in ownership and control, will have an impact on firm performance or economic growth
will be the deciding factor. It's unclear why politics should fix this problem if corporate governance has no effect
on performance [41].

Previous research has revealed, however, that there are numerous potential influence mechanisms via which
governance might affect performance. These disparities, for example, are related not only to the level of ownership
supervision and control, but also to the incentives provided for investment, innovation, and entrepreneurship.
Corporate governance influences performance, according to existing empirical research, and is thus a crucial
framework for corporate industrial competitiveness.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS :

The literature has documented the link between corporate governance and current management on the one hand,
and corporate governance and corporate performance on the other. However, when these two pieces of literature
are combined, a complex scenario emerges that necessitates additional research. Discretionary clauses must not
affect performance measurement indicators in order for governance variables to have an actual impact on
performance. Corporate governance influences financial performance when the expected performance takes into
consideration the manager's opportunistic tendencies, as demonstrated in this article. According to the findings,
independent directors should be appointed based on their historical performance rather than their proportion in
the total number of board members. Executive remuneration should also be connected to performance and should
not be excessively aggressive, so as not to mislead managers into manipulating reported results in order to boost
compensation, because their impact on firm performance is deemed excessive.

References :

[1] Andrews, J. M., & Nemeroff, C. B. (2019). Contemporary management of depression. The American
journal of medicine, 97(6), S24-S32.
[2] Bauer, R. M., Gozzi, C., Hübner, W., Nitti, V. W., Novara, G., Peterson, A., ... & Stief, C. G. (2021).
Contemporary management of postprostatectomy incontinence. European urology, 59(6), 985-996.
[3] Branson, D. M. (2016). Too Many Bells-Too Many Whistles-Corporate Governance in the Post-Enron,
Post-WorldCom Era. SCL Rev., 58, 65.
[4] Lembke, S., & Wilson, M. G. (2018). Putting the" team" into teamwork: Alternative theoretical
contributions for contemporary management practice. Human Relations, 51(7), 927-944.
[5] Claessens, S. (2016). Corporate governance and development. The World bank research observer, 21(1),
91-122.
[6] Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (2018). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate
governance. California management review, 25(3), 88-106.
[7] Ho, C. K. (2015). Corporate governance and corporate competitiveness: an international analysis.
Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(2), 211-253.
[8] Pesqueux, Y. (2016). Corporate governance and accounting systems: a critical perspective. Critical
perspectives on Accounting, 16(6), 797-823.
[9] Peasnell, K. V., Pope, P. F., & Young, S. (2016). Board monitoring and earnings management: do outside
directors influence abnormal accruals? Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32(7‐8), 1311-1346.
[10] Hussain, N., HAQUE, A. U., & Baloch, A. (2019). Management Theories: The Contribution of
Contemporary Management Theorists in Tackling Contemporary Management Challenges. Journal of
Yaşar University, 14, 156-169.
[11] Porth, S. J., & McCall, J. (2018). Contemporary management theories and Catholic social teaching.
Review of Business, 22(3), 8-15.

3749
The Evolution of Corporate Governance and Its Impact on Contemporary Management

[12] Pheng, L. S., & Leong, C. H. (2016). Asian management style versus Western management theories–A
Singapore case study in construction project management. Journal of Managerial Psychology.
[13] Kuroakegha, B. B., & Don-Solomon, A. (2019). Contextualizing Classical and Contemporary
Management Theories in African Society.
[14] Mansouri, M., & Rowney, J. I. A. (2017). The dilemma of accountability for professionals: A challenge
for mainstream management theories. Journal of business ethics, 123(1), 45-56.
[15] Hunter, M. (2016). The occidental colonization of the mind: The dominance of “western” management
theories in South-East Asian business schools. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 9(2),
95-114.
[16] Shrivastava, S., & Shrivastava, R. (2018, October). Understanding Knowledge Management Theories
with Organizational Practices. In International Conference on Contemporary Management
(INCOCOM’12) (p. 163).
[17] Vrontis, D., Weber, Y., Thrassou, A., Shams, S. R., & Tsoukatos, E. (Eds.). (2018). Innovation and
capacity building: Cross-disciplinary management theories for practical applications. Springer.
[18] Ananthram, S., & Nankervis, A. (2018). Global managerial skill sets, management development, and the
role of HR: An exploratory qualitative study of North American and Indian managers. Contemporary
Management Research, 9(3).
[19] Barry, M. L., & Du Plessis, Y. (2017). Emotional intelligence: a key human resource management
competence for project managers in the 21st century. Journal of Contemporary Management, 4(1), 1-19.
[20] Kaczmarek, B. (2016). Concepts and determinants of contemporary management in opinions of
managers-practitioners. Management, 9(1), 59-66.
[21] Zema, T., & Okonkwo, O. (2020). Contemporary management and ecology-Does the natural
environment help managers to make a business decision?. European Journal of Management and Social
Science, (1 (2)).
[22] Kaczmarek, B. (2018). Weaknesses of contemporary management methods in the opinion of managers
practitioners. Management, 22(1).
[23] Nanda, V. P. (2016). The “good governance” concept revisited. The ANNALS of the American academy
of political and social science, 603(1), 269-283.
[24] Ruhanen, L., Scott, N., Ritchie, B., & Tkaczynski, A. (2019). Governance: a review and synthesis of the
literature. Tourism Review.
[25] Kooper, M. N., Maes, R., & Lindgreen, E. R. (2018). On the governance of information: Introducing a
new concept of governance to support the management of information. International journal of
information management, 31(3), 195-200.
[26] Dittmar, A., Mahrt-Smith, J., & Servaes, H. (2018). International corporate governance and corporate
cash holdings. Journal of Financial and Quantitative analysis, 38(1), 111-133.
[27] Gibbs, P. A. (2019). Determinants of corporate restructuring: The relative importance of corporate
governance, takeover threat, and free cash flow. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S1), 51-68.
[28] Dignam, A., & Galanis, M. (2018). Corporate governance and the importance of macroeconomic context.
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 28(2), 201-243.
[29] Davies, A. (2016). Best practice in corporate governance: Building reputation and sustainable success.
Routledge.
[30] Ramaswamy, V., Ueng, C. J., & Carl, L. (2018). Corporate governance characteristics of growth
companies: An empirical study. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 7, 21.
[31] Chen, K. Y., Elder, R. J., & Hsieh, Y. M. (2017). Corporate governance and earnings management: The
implications of corporate governance best-practice principles for Taiwanese listed companies. Journal of
Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 3(2), 73-105.
[32] Junju, M. (2020). The Contemporary Development of the Corporate Govermance and the Reform of
Corporate Governance in China [J]. CASS JOURNAL OF LAW, 2.
[33] Calleja, R., & Melé, D. (2017). Valero’s “Enterprise Politics”: A model of humanistic management and
corporate governance. Journal of Management Development.
[34] Man, C. K., & Wong, B. (2018). Corporate governance and earnings management: A survey of literature.
Journal of Applied Business Research, 29(2), 391-418.
[35] FENG, G. F., & Wen, J. (2018). An Empirical Study on Relationship between Corporate Governance
and Technical Innovation of Chinese Listed Companies [J]. China Industrial Economics, 7, 91-101.
[36] Sayilir, Ö. (2018). Relationship between corporate governance and financial performance of Turkish
companies. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(14).

3750
The Evolution of Corporate Governance and Its Impact on Contemporary Management

[37] Ezzamel, M., & Willmott, H. (2019). Corporate governance and financial accountability: recent reforms
in the UK public sector. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 6(3), 0-0.
[38] Gürbüz, A. O., Aybars, A., & Kutlu, Ö. (2020). Corporate Governance and Financial Performance with
a Perspective on Institutional Ownership: Empirical Evidence from Turkey. Journal of Applied
Management Accounting Research, 8(2).
[39] Musacchio, A. (2019). Experiments in financial democracy: corporate governance and financial
development in Brazil, 1882-1950. Cambridge University Press.
[40] Millar, C. C., Eldomiaty, T. I., Choi, C. J., & Hilton, B. (2018). Corporate governance and institutional
transparency in emerging markets. Journal of business ethics, 59(1), 163-174.
[41] Manafi, R., Mahmoudian, A., & Zabihi, A. (2016). Study of the relationship between corporate
governance and financial performance of the companies listed in Tehran stock exchange market.
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 56-56.

3751