We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
pee Republic of the Philippines
| @ ey | Department of Education
Research Journal
Volume 1 Issue Number 1 | Zeal for Pro:
ISSN: 2984-6501TABLE CONTENTS
Title
Special Support Strategy (SSS): An Aide
in Modular Distance Learning of Students
from Families with
Low Educational Attainment
Challenges, Coping Mechanism, and
Learning Outcomes Using Modular
Approach: A Learning Action Cell (LAC)
‘Training
Effectiveness of Flipped-Blended
Classroom Strategy in Teaching
Mathematics
Competence of the Learning Resource
Evaluators (LREs) in Performing
their Roles and Responsibilities: A
Capability Building Program
for Conformance Review
Maximizing Mental Health and
Psychological Support
Services Poster: Aura in Enhancing
Resiliency in the New Normal
Addressing Challenges in the
Implementation of Programs, Projects,
and Activities in Youth Formation
Division
In-House Enhancement Training
Employing Competency-based
‘Training (CBT) Approach on Grade 12
TVL-ICT-CSS
Practical Performance
Challenges, Coping Mechanisms, and
Learning Experiences in Developing Self-
Learning Modules: Capacitating Senior
High School Science Module Writers
Engaging Generation Z Learners in the
New Normal Through ThinkTok
Author
Junnel B. Amarilla
Kevin Jhon A. Argones
Mark Andrew G. Francisco
Ma. Madelene P. Mituda, EdD
Creslil Sangrenes-Andaya, EdD
Balsamo, Rowena B., PDO-IV
Indin, Miriam A., MO-IV
Aspiras, Ma. Eden G., PDO-II
Algie B. Regafion
Ma. Theresa C. Tarranza
Romel C. Robledo
Page
ll
a
45
54
65
73
83Special Support Strategy (SSS): An Aide in Modular Distance
Learning of Students from Families with
Low Educational Attainment
Amarilla, Junnel B.
Teacher I
Mahayag School of Arts and Trades
Department of Education, Division of Zamboanga del Sur
[Link]@[Link]
09108179293
Abstract
A modular distance modality is a learning approach that uses. self-learning
modules in which learning takes place without teachers and students physically
interacting. It is the preferred distance learning method in this new normal time
However, learners from families with low educational attainment struggled to
adapt to this innovation. This scenario paves the way for devising a Special
Support Strategy (SSS) intervention. Moreover, this action research sought to
determine the impact of SSS on students from families with low educational
attainment. A mixed-method concurrent triangulation research design was
maximized in this undertaking. The research participants were the 20
purposively chosen grade 12 students from Mahayag School of Arts and Trades
during the School Year 2020-2021. Mean percentage score (MPS) and interrupted
time series analysis was used to treat the study's quantitative data. The findings
revealed that SSS has significantly increased students’ achievement levels as
students’ mean scores were low during pretests. They significantly rose in the
series of posttests administered after implementing the intervention. Moreover, in
the qualitative phase, (1) ease of learning struggle, (2) boost in learners’
interest, and (3) relief of mental pressure came out to be the themes in the in-
depth interview. Furthermore, these two conforming findings proved that SSS had
a significant positive impact on learners, especially those from low educational
attainment families.
Keywords: family's educational attainment; modular distance learning;
new normal; Special Support Strategy
Introduction
The global outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has spread worldwide,
affecting almost all countries and territories. Governments throughout the world
issued an advisory to exercise extreme caution. Handwashing, wearing face
masks, physical distance, and avoiding big gatherings and assemblies have been
used as public health initiatives. In order to mitigate or control the spread of the
disease, lockdown, and stay- at-home techniques have been implemented (Sintema
2020).
In education, the pandemic wreaked havoc on its system, affecting nearly
1.6 billion students in over 200 countries. Due to school and other learning space
closures, more than 94 percent of the world's student population has been impacted
(Pokhrel and Chhetri 2021).
In the Philippines, ensuring the welfare of more than 27 million students
enrolled in basic education alone calls for unwavering dedication despite the
current health crisis. To not deprive learners of their right to quality education as
stipulated in the 1987 Constitution article XIV, sections 1 and 2, Covid-19's public
health emergency calls the Department of Education to be innovative and
resourceful in delivering quality, accessible, relevant, and liberating education.
ZamPen Research Journal | ISSN: 2984-6501Through DepEd Order No. 12, s. 2020, various learning modalities aimed at
maintaining the delivery of high-quality education to Filipino learners were
introduced.
Among those different distance learning modalities, modular learning is the
most popular type (Bernardo 2020). The survey spearheaded by the Department of
Education (DepEd) showed that 8.8 million out of the 22.2 million enrolled
learners preferred modular distance learning for the upcoming school year. Thus,
this learning method is currently used by all public schools in the Philippines.
Modular distance learning is a learning modality that uses Self-Learning
Modules (SLM) based on the Department of Education's most essential learning
capabilities (MELCS}. The modules include parts on motivation and assessment
that serve as a comprehensive reference to the required competencies of both
teachers and students. Teachers will keep track of the student's development
through home visits but continuously observe the implemented health protocols
and feedback mechanisms, guiding those who require further help (Manlangit et
al. 2020). Moreover, this learning modality situates Filipino students to learn in
the comfort of their homes and with limited contact with teachers that place
parents or guardians as the learners’ model or the more knowledgeable other.
However, in a survey conducted by Social Weather Stations (SWS) in March
2021, for families with children enrolled in school for the 2020-21 school year,
89% of them perceived modular learning to be "more difficult” than traditional face
-to-face instruction (Mercado 2021). Although schools give printed materials and
some give internet support, parents have expressed concern that the existing
system forces students to study independently. This problem was also proven in
the findings of Dangle and Sumaoang (2020) in their study on implementing
modular learning in public secondary schools in the Philippines. It was found that
students had difficulty with self-studying, and parents lacked the knowledge to
academically guide their child/children (Herliandry et al. 2020)
Locally, this scenario is also deemed true at Mahayag School of Arts and
Trades. From the observation and casual conversation with the parents whenever
they go to school to return and get a new self-learning module, most of them
expressed the same sentiments that their son/daughter was struggling in learning
independently and did not know how to help their respective child. Approximately
eighty percent of the senior high school parents/guardians shared the same
problem regarding this modular learning modality. A survey revealed that the
educational attainment of any member of the family of those struggling learners
was at most a high school graduate only. According to Brossard, Kamei, and
Correa (2020) parents’ lack of education and ability to provide support for
homework crucially affect child learning outcomes, especially during school
closures. As a result, learners from families with low educational attainment had
little or no progress while learning from home. Thus, learning loss was most
pronounced among students from disadvantaged homes (Engzell, Frey, and
Verhagen 2021).
This emerging problem should not hamper every learner's right to attain
meaningful learning. Article XIV, Section 1 of the 1987 Constitution kept
reminding us of what must be due to our learners. This right must always be
preserved, and the Department of Education is responsible for providing learning
opportunities notwithstanding the national emergency of COVID-19, even though
the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan (BE-LCP) is perfectly crafted to
cater to the learner's need for quality education during this pandemic.
Nevertheless, it cannot be denied that there were gray areas on the receiving end
on the part of the learners. As one of the primary movers in the delivery of quality
education in the department, it is a teacher's responsibility to help find a way to
solve this existing problem to enhance the quality of education the learners receive
in this new normal time.
Region IX3
With these, a Special Support Strategy (SSS) was created with the drive to
address the learners’ struggles, especially those from low educational attainment
families where they were most likely to have less access to different aspects of
information and support. It is a strategy that wishes to lighten the burden of
students to achieve meaningful learning in this new normal time. This action
research aims to determine the impact of this devised intervention on students
learning through modular distance modality. Hence, the outcome of this
undertaking could be an excellent contribution to ensuring the delivery of quality
education despite this pandemic.
Innovation, Intervention, and Strategy. The researcher invented an
intervention called Special Support Strategy (SSS). It addresses learners’ difficulty in
self-learning and the problem with parents’ lack of knowledge to guide them
academically, as described by Dangle and Sumaoang (2020). This strategy is
anchored on the idea of the scaffolding technique. Nevertheless, this intervention's
very purpose is to give students the academic support. Moreover, it aims to ease the
burden of students from families with low educational attainment in achieving
meaningful learning through modular distance modality. This strategy is designed
specifically for the learners from families with low educational attainment but is not
limited to them.
There are three primary forms of this strategy: (a) the Buddy System
approach, the teacher-KaPurok sympathy approach, and (c) the foster family
approach. The first SSS form is known as the buddy system approach. It refers to the
extra help provided to a student by a co-grade learner who is academically capable
and lives close to the struggling student's house. The identified academically
talented co-grade learner is called buddy. The buddy's role is to assist the
struggling student in comprehending the module's topics and activities. The
teacher is the one who identifies and assigns a designated buddy to those students
who qualify for special assistance.
The second form is referred to as teacher-kapurok sympathy. It refers to the
designated student receiving extra help from a teacher or some other "Purok"
member to complete the module lessons. The teacher must establish a strong
linkage with the barangay local government unit to make this type or form possible.
As a result, individuals within the barangay with a strong sense of volunteerism in
helping others have the opportunity to be included in this second "SSS" form.
The third approach is known as the foster family approach. It relates to the
extra help provided by a family with a high educational background who lives close
to the struggling student's home.
Lastly, the type of special support given to identified struggling learners
mainly relies on which of those types is more convenient and can minimize learners
movement from other places. Thus, the utmost priority is ensuring first learners’
health safety without hampering their learning.
Action Research Questions. This action research attempts to probe that
special support strategy could address the learning struggle of students from
disadvantaged homes. Moreover, it determines the impact of the Special Support
System (SSS) on learning of students from families with low educational attainment
who are studying through a modular approach in this new normal time in Mahayag
School of Arts and Trade, Mahayag North District, Division of Zamboanga del Sur,
School Year 2020-2021.
Specifically, this sought to answer the following queries:
[Link] is the level of students’ achievement using the Special Support
Strategy in the series of pretests and posttests conducted?
2.1s there a significant difference between the students’ pretests and posttests
achievement levels?
[Link] is the participants’ experience regarding their learning through a
modular distance learning approach with the Special Support Strategy?
[Link] on the study findings, what is the impact of the Special Support
Strategy on those students from families with low educational attainment?
ZamPen Research Journal | ISSN: 2984-6501Research Method
Research Design
The current action research employed a mixed-method concurrent
triangulation research design. This model uses quantitative and qualitative data
collection and analysis separately. Then, the results are converged during the
interpretation (Creswell 1999). Specifically, the qualitative phase maximized
interrupted time-series research design, and phenomenological research design
was used in the qualitative phase.
This research design is considered appropriate for this undertaking
because this study's main objective is to determine the impact of SSS
quantitatively and qualitatively on students in this modular distance learning.
Both results are compared if they conform with one another. Thus, it would
lead to a sound basis if SSS is an aide in students’ leaning in a modular
approach.
Research Participants
The participants of this study were the twenty grade twelve students of
Mahayag School of Arts and Trades, the School Year 2020-2021. The researcher
believed these participants were the most mature among other lower-grade
students. Nevertheless, it was assumed that they could provide more
appropriate and refined data for this study. In the quantitative phase, twenty
purposively chosen students who qualify to the criterion that they must be from
families with low educational attainment were the ones who experienced the
intervention. Specifically, these were students whose parents and other
members of the family's educational attainment were at an elementary level, a
high school undergraduate, or most a high school graduate only. Thus, no one
in the family who is at least a college level or above from it.
While in the qualitative phase, eight out of the initial twenty students were
utilized to undergo an in-depth interview about their experience on SSS. These
were students whose parents and family members only were at most elementary
graduates.
Research Instrument
The researcher-made achievement tests for the series of pretests and the
posttests were used in this study. It undergoes face validity only as some panel
of experts was checking it within the school. Interview-guide questions were
maximized in the qualitative phase of this undertaking, and the researcher
himself conducted the in- depth interview
Data Gathering Procedure
To ensure the integrity of the research conduct, the researcher secured
permission from the office of the school principal on her consent allowing the
researcher to conduct this study that aims to address the student's struggles
with self-learning in this new normal time.
Upon approval, a set of participants was purposively identified to probe
the impact of "SSS" on their learning. As an indispensable step in the data
collection phase, the research participants were wholly informed about the
purpose and significance of the study and their involved commitment and
protection of confidentiality. Nevertheless, informed consent was requested first
from them.
After such, the researcher established a strong linkage with the
stakeholders by searching for some special assistance that could be provided to
the research participants, such as a buddy scheme, teacher-kapurok, and foster
family approach. After all the students already had special support, a series of
researcher-made pretests were administered.
Region IXThen, during the application of the intervention, the researchers
simultaneously conducted an in-depth interview with eight students who were
significantly in need of special support to achieve meaningful learning. The
interview was done to determine their perception of special support in their
studies. After such, a series of posttests were given to all the participants.
Lastly, the gathered quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed and
interpreted simultaneously. Hence, both findings were presented and took part as
the basis of whether this strategy was effective.
Data Analysis
This research undertaking utilized the mixed method concurrent
triangulation research design. It follows that both quantitative and qualitative
data were simultaneously gathered.
The quantitative data were the scores of students in a series of pretests
and posttests. Moreover, the qualitative data were transcribed from interviews
with some research participants. Separate analyses of quantitative and qualitative
data were strictly observed. Then, both findings were compared if they conformed
with one another.
Furthermore, in the analysis of the quantitative data, descriptive statistics
such as mean, mean percentage score (MPS) and its descriptive equivalent were
used to describe students’ achievement level in the pretests and posttests. The
scoring system was adopted from DepEd Memo No. 160, s. 2012.
Specified below is the mastery /achievement level:
MASTERY / ACHIEVEMENT LEVEL.
MPS Descriptive Equivalent
96 - 100% Mastered
86 - 95% Closely Approximating Mastery
66 - 85% Moving Towards Mastery
35-65% Average
15-34% Low
5- 14% Very Low
0-4% Absolutely No Mastery
Interrupted time series analysis was maximized as well to track if there
was a significant difference between the achievement levels of students in the
pretests and posttests, respectively. Then, to assess the effect of the intervention
also.
In the analysis of the qualitative data, a thematic analysis was used to
interpret students’ experiences regarding the intervention.
Results and Discussion
The significant findings of this study, analysis, and interpretation of data
gathered to elucidate the impact of Special Support Strategy "SSS" on the studies
of learners through modular approach modality are hereby stressed.
Table 1 below displays the students’ level of achievement in terms of mean
percentage scores (MPS) in the series of pretests and posttests. In the pretest series,
the MPS are 34%, 42%, and 38.3 %, respectively. Accordingly, its descriptive
equivalents to students’ achievement level are low on the first pretest and average
on both the second and third pretests. Then, in the series of posttests, the MPS
were 79.5%, 74.5%, and 88.5%, respectively. Moving towards mastery is the
students’ achievement level in the first two posttests and closely approximating
mastery on the last posttest.
ZamPen Research Journal | ISSN: 2984-6501Table 1: Students' Achievement Level Before and After Experiencing the
Intervention
Test Mean Percentage pescriptive Equivalent
1st Pretest 34% low
2nd Pretest 42% Average
3rd Pretest 38.3% Average
Ist Post Test 79.5% Moving Towards Mastery
2nd Post Test 74.5% Moving Towards Mastery
3rd Post Test 88.5% Closely Approximating Mastery
Figure 1 presents the interrupted time series analysis of pretests and the
posttests. mean scores of students before and after experiencing the
intervention. The mean scores in the series of pretests were 3.4, 4.2, and 3.83,
respectively. While in the series of posttests, the computed mean scores were
7.95, 7.45, and 8.85. The data clearly shows that students' mean scores were
low during the pretests compared to the student's scores in the posttests.
Moreover, it can be seen that students’ mean scores significantly arouse after
the implementation of the intervention, as represented by the borderline. The
undeniable significant increase of mean scores of students after experiencing
the intervention entails a lot on the impact of SSS on students’ achievement
level during this pandemic.
Figure 1: Interrupted Time Series Analysis of the Pretest and Posttest
Mean Scores of Students
9
8
a7
Q
8 6
Qs
Zz Legend
4 : O- pretest
53 . posttest
X- intervention
1
0
Oz O; X a a as
TEST ADMINISTERED
However, amid this pandemic, data were gathered not face-to-face. Hence
the researcher is following the health safety protocol. The question of how
reliable the students’ posttests scores in this study is one of the struggles the
researcher had met. Moreover, to corroborate the quantitative findings of this
study, research participants’
Region IXperceptions concerning their experience with the intervention were
simultaneously gathered.
Maximizing Delahunt's (2017) coding matrix, the following themes were
obtained:
Ease Learning Struggle. Understanding the module or learning activity
sheet independently by the student is a struggle (Gueta and Janer 2020).
Learners significantly experiencing difficulty are those having no physical
guidance from any knowledgeable other. Yet, this problem is profound for
learners from disadvantaged homes (Engzell, Frey and Verhagen 2021). However,
a Special Support Strategy was found to have addressed this issue as
participants 1 and 2 have expressed that the intervention had eased their
learning struggles.
“Napasayon ra gyud ang pag answer kung naa
makatabang og explain sa mga lisod sabton nga parte sa
modyul.[It is easy now to answer the activities in the
modules because there will be someone I could ask for on
those part that I hardly understand ] -P1
“Mas pabor ang pag answer sa modyul kung naa
makatabang nga nakabalo sa topic. Kay naa ra man
mapangutan an ko sa akoa mga Kalibog,” [It is better to
answer the module if there will be someone who will help
and knows about the topic because my confusions will be
directly address.| -P2
This themed exhibits that SSS has the quality of effective teaching strategy
as Killen (2007) said that an effective teaching strategy is the one that caters to
the needs of the learners to let them achieve meaningful learning. Thus, seeking
a strong support group will inspire the learners to conquer exhausting problems
as they will be guided in the learning process (Baraquia 2022).
Boost Learners’ Interest. Interest is a powerful motivational process that
energizes learning and guides academic and career paths (Renninger and Hidi
2019). In teaching, learners’ interests must be kept intact throughout the
teaching-learning process in order for the students to achieve meaningful
learning. Moreover, it is the teacher's responsibility to look for a strategy that
would arouse and keep students interested throughout the learning experience.
During this pandemic, students remarkably lost motivation and learning
performance (Tan 2020). With this, it urged teachers to be innovative this time in
order to boost students’ interest. Luckily, a special support strategy has shown a
good effect on leamers’ interest. It was found that SSS had pushed leamers to
answer their modules though there were times that they felt like being lazy as P2
and P5 stressed that having the intervention gives them a sort of encouragement
to answer their modules.
“Naa gyud panahon nga tapulan kaayo ko moanswer sa
module pero kay naa man makatabang nako sa akoa
kalibog mao nga ganahan ko moanswer nalang gyud og
egrab ang opportunity mentras naa motabang.” [There
were times that I feit lazy in answering my modules,
however, since there is someone who willingly help me in
explaining and clarifying difficult parts of the topic, so I felt
motivated with it and waste no time of having such
opportunity.] -P2
ZamPen Research Journal | ISSN: 2984-6501“Mapugos ko moanswer na usahay imbis nga kapuiyan unta
ko. Unya naa man akoa klasmate...siya man ang giassign ni
Sir nga motabang nako pasabot sa module” [I am somehow
forced to answer the module since my classmate was here
already. However, she was the one that my teacher assigned
to me to help me understand the module.] -P5
This emerging theme supported the idea of several authors. Like on Amjah
(2014) about the right strategies in teaching. He emphasized that the right
strategies are those who let students to be interested in learning. Then, on
Bidabadi et al. (2016) stressed out that a good teaching strategy helps the
students to question their preconceptions and motivates them to learn. Moreover,
interest and involvement in the learning process are essential elements to
stimulate the learners (Baraquia 2019).
Relief on Mental Pressure. Students are at a higher risk of social
isolation and the development of mental health problems during the COVID-19
crisis, as stressed by Elmer et al. (2020). Nevertheless, struggling to understand
the modules added to the development of mental health problems for the
learners. However, a Special Support Strategy (SSS) gave a positive mindset to
learners from families with low educational attainment that they were not alone
in fighting mental pressure brought by individually answering modules where of
which they were not used. This was proven in the statement of participant 4 (P4)
below.
“Maynalang gyud nga naa ra jud makatabang nako nga
makatubag sa akoa kalibog sa pag answer sa modyul. Kay
dire sa balay wala jud maka tabang nako kay si mama og
papa . . elementary ra kutob. Niya si ate pa jud [Sir] kay
highschool graduate pero wala daw siya kaagi ane sab
[Link] ko mabuang atong una [sir] nga dili ko kasabot
unya unsaon nalang nako ni.” {I am fortunate that there will
be someone who always help me in clarifying some
confusions I’ve met in answering the module. Because here in
our house, there will be no one that could help me with it
since my mother and father is only an elementary graduate.
Then, my elder sister is a high school graduate. However, she
said that she didn’t meet any of the topics in the module
before. I felt paranoid at first on what should to do with it]. -
P4
This last theme depicts that SSS has addressed the challenge of Becker
(2021) as he emphasized that educators are vital in protecting student mental
health during the COVID-19 pandemic. As for students struggling in learning,
resources for help must be out there. The best thing to do is to connect the
students to the best form of available support, whether in their homes, schools,
or communities. Thus, SSS's primary role is to support learners in their learning
struggles, and it even relieves their mental pressure during this time.
The study's quantitative and qualitative findings are clearly in consonance
with each other. It unarguably shows that ‘SSS’ has an enormous positive
impact on the modular approach modality learners in this new normal time.
Region IX9
This result conforms with the findings of Van De Pol, Volman, and
Beishuizen (2010) in their research about scaffolding in teacher-student
interaction, where they concluded that scaffolding [like having special support] is
very effective in the teaching-learning process and it is more potent to improve
students’ academic achievement (Boris 2020). Lastly, the result implies that a
special support strategy is a promising innovation to complement students’
attainment of meaningful learning with modular distance modality.
Conclusion and Recommendations
This study seeks to establish a claim on the impact of Special Support Strategy
(SSS) on students learning through modular distance modality. The data revealed
a significant increase in students’ achievement levels after students experienced
the intervention, based on what was depicted in the interrupted time series
analysis graph. Moreover, the qualitative phase showed that SSS had eased
learning struggles, boosted leamers' interest, and relieved mental pressure.
Hence, those were the emerging theme from the in-depth interview. The
conforming results of this study's quantitative and qualitative phases clearly
show that the Special Support Strategy (SSS) had addressed the current struggle
on self-learning of students from low-educational attainment families on
modular distance modality. It even serves as a motivating factor and relieves the
mental pressure most students need in this new normal time. Moreover, SSS is a
suitable intervention that contributes to ensuring the delivery of quality
education despite this pandemic. Thus, SSS is undoubtedly an aid to students
learning in modular distance modality. Further, the outcome of the study
recommended the following: (a] SSS must be considered by the teachers as one
of the effective strategies to be maximized during this time, and (b) modification
or strengthening of this strategy by the panel of experts in the education would
be of big help to attain much meaningful learning on the part of the learners.
References
Amjah, Dk Yusimah Pg H. 2014. "A study of teachers’ strategies so develop
students’ interest towards learning English as a second language."
Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 134: 188-192
Baraquia, Lee G. 2019. “Students’ Science Engagement Scale (SSES): Developing
the Constructs to Measure Science Engagement.” Panagdait
Multidisciplinary Research Journal 1, no. 1., 99-110.
Baraquia, Lee G. 2022. “Teachers’ Coping Strategies with the Challenges in the
Department of Education: A Phenomenological Study.” Panagdait Journal
of Learning, Culture, and Educational Trends 2, no. 1., 69-80.
Becker, Marty Swanbrow. 2021. "Educators are key in protecting student mental
health during the COVID-19 pandemic." The Brown Center Chalkboard.
Bemardo, Jaehwa. 2020. "Modular Learning most preferred parents: DepEd.
ABS-CBN News."
Bidabadi, Nahid Shirani, Anmmadreza Nasr Isfahani, Amir Rouhollahi, and Roya
Khalili. 2016. “Effective teaching methods in higher education:
requirements and barriers." Journal of advances in medical education &
professionalism 4, no. 4: 170.
Boris, Olufunke O. 2020. "Effects of Problem Solving Teaching Strategy on
Secondary School Students’ Academic Performance in Chemistry in Ondo
State, Nigeria.” IJRAR-International Journal of Research and ‘Analytical
Reviews 7, no. 2: 74-80.
Brossard, Matt, Akito Kamei and Javier Santiago Ortiz Correa. 2020. "Despina
Karamperidou, Nikoletta Theodorou, Thomas Dreesen."
ZamPen Research Journal | ISSN: 2984-6501Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines, 2 February 1987.
Creswell, John W. 1999, "Mixed-method research: Introduction and
application." In Handbook of educational policy, pp. 455-472. Academic
Press.
Dangle, Ysthr Rave P. and Johnine D. Sumaoang. 2020. "The implementation of
modular distance learning in the Philippine secondary public schools.” In
3rd International Conference on Advanced Research in Teaching and
Education, vol. 100, p. 108.
Delahunt, Charles Boise. 2017. Smart as a Bug: A Computational Model of
Learning in the Moth Olfactory Network, with Applications to Neural Nets.
Diss.
Department of Education Memorandum No. 160, s. 2012. Maximizing Utilization
of the National Achievement Test (NAT) Results to Raise the Achievement
Levels in Low Performing Schools.
Department of Education Order No. 12, s. 2020. Adoption of the Basic Education
Learning Continuity Plan for SY 2020-2021 in light of the COVID-19 Public
Health Emergency.
Elmer, Timon, Kieran Mepham and Christoph Stadtfeld. 2020. "Students under
lockdown: Comparisons of students’ social networks and mental health
before and during the COVID-19 crisis in Switzerland." Plos one 15, no. 7:
0236337.
Engzell, Per, Arun Frey and Mark D. Verhagen. 2021. "Learning loss due to
school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic.” Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences 118, no. 17.
Gueta, Maricar F. and Susan S. Janer. 2021. "Distance Learning Challenges on
the Use of Self-Learning Module." United International Journal for Research
& Technology 2, no. 07.
Herliandry, Luh Devi, Nurhasanah Nurhasanah, Maria Enjelina Suban and Heru
Kuswanto. 2020. "Pembelajaran pada masa pandemi covid-19." JTP-Jurnal
Teknologi Pendidikan 22, no. 1: 65-70.
Killen, Roy. 2007. Teaching strategies for outcomes-based education. Juta and
‘Company Ltd.
Manlangit, P., A. M. Paglumotan, and 8. C. Sapera. 2020. "Nanay, handa na ba
kayong maging tagapagdaloy? Supercharging Filipino parents is key for
successful modular distance learning." FlipScience. Retrieved on March 14
(2020).
Mercado, Neil Arwin. 2021. “SWS: 89% of families say blended learning is harder
than
face-to-face classes”. [Link], March 14, 2021.
Pokhrel, Sumitra and Roshan Chhetri. 2021. "A literature review on impact of
COVID- 19 pandemic on teaching and learning.” Higher Education for the
Future 8, no. 1: 133-141.
Renninger, K. Ann and Suzanne E. Hidi. 2019. "Interest development and learning.
Sintema, Edgar John. 2020. "Effect of COVID-19 on the performance of grade 12
students: Implications for STEM education." Eurasia Journal of
Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 16, no. 7: em1851.
Tan, Consilz. 2020. "The impact of COVID-19 on student motivation, community
of inquiry and learning performance.” Asian Education and Development
Studies
Van de Pol, Janneke, Monique Volman, and Jos Beishuizen. 2010. "Scaffolding
in teacher-student interaction:’ A decade of research." Educationai
psychology review 22, no. 3: 271-296
Region IXChallenges, Coping Mechanism, and Learning Outcomes Using
Modular Approach: A Learning Action Cell (LAC) Training
Argones, Kevin Jhon A.
Teacher I
Napolan National High School, Pagadian City Department of
Education, Division of Pagadian City
[Link]@[Link]
Abstract
This study investigated the Challenges, Coping Mechanisms, and Learning
Outcomes of the students using the Modular Approach. This research study was
conducted at Napolan National High School during the School Year 2020 - 2021.
The quantitative aspect of this study employed a survey questionnaire. This study
utilized statistical tools such as mean, standard deviation, and Pearson
correlation. The extent to which students encountered the challenges in the new
normal using the Modular Approach revealed a high result. In the same manner,
the extent to which students manifested coping mechanisms to the different
challenges in the new normal using a modular approach revealed a high result.
On the other hand, students’ level of learning outcomes using modular approach
revealed a satisfactory result using the Pearson r correlation. The study results
showed a high positive correlation between the coping mechanism and learning
outcomes of the students, which means that the students’ learning outcomes
depend on their coping ‘mechanisms. The findings of this research study
significantly imply that students have experienced various challenges in the
modular learning approach and show a significant relationship between the level
of learning outcomes and coping mechanisms among the students.
Keywords: challenges and coping mechanism; learning delivery; learning outcomes;
modular approach
Introduction
The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak causes a drastic change in
the world that affects our typical day-to-day activities. This outbreak brought
significant economic, transportation, recreation, and education gaps, causing
several disruptions from the school system's opening worldwide. Many countries
have decided to suspend the schools’ opening because of the high risk of
spreading the disease since it spreads very fast in just a couple of weeks and
months, and there is no specific country in the world that is immune to this
disease. Nonetheless, the progress of researching and producing a vaccine is at
hand.
According to the figures reported on the Department of Health (DOH)
website, our country, the Philippines have 336,926 total recorded cases; 54,594
are active cases in the record, of which 17 active cases come from our city as of
October 10, 2020. Hence, the government decided to suspend the opening of the
school year 2020-2021. This outbreak challenges the country's education sector
to develop an alternative plan to continue the students’ education, considering
the effects if it stops. Thus, the department issued DepEd Order No.012, s.2020,
also known as the "Adoption of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan for
School Year 2020-2021 in Light of the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency" to
address the challenges posed in the education and ensure the learning
continuity in the country.
Moreover, according to the press release in the DepEd website, the
Department of Education, headed by the Secretary of Education Leonor Magtolis
Briones, together with the ministers of education in the Southeast Asian
ZamPen Research Journal | ISSN: 2984-650112
nations, lay down their different strategies to continue the education in response
to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) during the first southeast Asian Ministers
of Education Organization (SEAMEO) Ministerial Policy e-Forum held last June
18, 2020. This action means that the department is doing its best to ensure that
instruction delivery will continue throughout the country by working
collaboratively with other nations amidst the global crisis.
Along with this pandemic, a new usual way of delivering education to the
students has shifted from the typical face-to-face education to non-face-to-face
instruction. Thus, the Department of Education identified multiple essential
learning modalities to continue providing education to our 27,008,605 students in
the country, of which 1,039,924 students come from Region IX (Deped Order No.
012, s. 2020 "The Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan in the Time of COVID
-19") like modular distance learning, online distance learning, TV/Radio-based
instruction, blended learning, and homeschooling. These learning modalities are
almost new to our students used in the delivery of education. Hence, the student's
learning outcome might be affected positively or negatively, and teachers will
encounter several challenges in carrying out the different learning modalities.
The modular teaching approach is not new since it is one of the most
common and recognized teaching-learning techniques used in the United States,
Australia, and many other Western countries, including the Asian region (Sejpal
2013). The modular learning approach can deliver most subjects like Science,
Mathematics, and Language to our students to learn the lesson independently.
Khan Academy has successfully created and offered online modular packages to
help students master many subjects. The Khan Academy is one of the familiar
online sources used for reference, especially in science since they comprehensively
explain specific lessons. They have a library of more than 4300 videos designed to
tutor students through clear learning objectives and offer an example. However,
learning science can be more meaningful with hands- on activities, problem-based
learning, an inquiry-based approach, and immediate follow-ups. Sahin (2009)
explained that problem-based learning involves teaching how to resolve problems
in the real world through experiential learning and facilitating. Students’
interactions with other students stimulate them to become aware of their cognitive
processing (Larkin 2006). Students need time to speak and discuss their ideas,
aside from learning the lesson by reading materials and activities.
Inquiry-based learning in science is highly encouraged to use since it
stimulates the students’ minds to think beyond knowing that the role of the
students as passive learners of a static body of knowledge in the past is no longer
relevant today; thus, replacing to active learners is an essential one where they
scrutinize information through examining data, formulating a hypothesis, and
constructing knowledge (Fernandez 2017). The lack of face-to-face instruction
hinders teachers from doing immediate action such as scaffolding them to attain
their proximal development in learning the lesson. Since all schools in the region
opted to have the modular learning approach based on the research conducted by
the Department of Education for this school year, the researcher wanted to
investigate how students respond to this approach - their challenges, coping
mechanisms, and learning outcomes.
Innovation, Intervention, and Strategy. Education is a fundamental
human right. Every child is entitled to enjoy this right. Hence, the Department of
Education pushes the school year's opening for the continuity of education for
everyone amidst the global outbreak. The researcher administered a survey type
questionnaire to the respondents. And based on the results, the researcher
drafted a training framework for teachers on making supplementary materials like
Strategic Intervention Material (SIM) and Leaning Activity Sheets (LAS) in the new
normal using the modular approach and implemented this training through LAC
sessions.
Region IX13
Moreover, upon assessing the students’ learning outcomes for the
first quarter, the researcher provided essential intervention to whatever suits the
students need to enhance their learning outcomes to ensure that the students
are free from confusion and doubts about the lesson. The researcher conducted
a group consultation through video teleconference, group chats, phone calls, and
text messages to facilitate the students’ learning.
‘Action Research Questions. As the opening of classes has already
commenced amidst this global crisis, many parents, so with teachers, ask about
their child's learning outcome so with the challenges met by the students in
carrying out this new usual way. Several questions that are viral in social media
are, is it effective in educating the students? Does modular learning modality
impart knowledge to the students? Thus, this action research intended to
investigate the Challenges, Coping Mechanisms, and Learning Outcomes in the
New Normal using the Modular Approach.
Specifically, this action research sought to answer the following
questions:
To what extent do students encounter the challenges in the new
normal using a Modular Approach?
. To what extent do students manifest the coping mechanisms to the
different challenges in the new normal using a modular approach?
. What is the level of learning outcomes of students using the
modular approach?
4. Is there a significant relationship between the coping mechanism
and students’ learning outcome in the new normal using modular
approach?
eon
Research Method
Research Design
In this study, the researcher utilized the quantitative-correlational
research design. Quantitative data were gathered on the extent to which students
encountered the challenges and the extent to which students manifested the
coping mechanisms to the different challenges in the new normal using modular
approach. The level of learning outcomes of students using the modular approach
was also gathered in this research. Correlational design was also employed to test
the significant relationship between the coping mechanism and learning outcomes
of students in the new normal using modular approach.
Research Participants
This study was conducted at Napolan National High School, Napolan,
Pagadian City, during the school year 2020-2021. Purposive sampling was utilized
in choosing all forty (40) Grade 10 Eagle students at the said school to participate
as the study's respondents. These research participants are under the Science
class of the researcher.
Research Instrument
The researcher utilized self-made survey-type questionnaires. The first
questionnaire consists of fifteen (15) items that measure the extent to which students
encountered the challenges in the new normal using a Modular Approach. The
subsequent part of the instrument is a ten (10)-item questionnaire used to measure
the extent to which students manifested the coping mechanisms to the different
challenges in the new normal using a modular approach. The questionnaires of this
study underwent the test of validity and reliability by the selected school heads and
master teachers at the selected schools in the Division of Pagadian City with a
Cronbach's alpha value of 0.884 and 0.885, respectively. This value is more than the
standard, which is 0.70, interpreted as highly reliable.
ZamPen Research Journal | ISSN: 2984-650114
Data Gathering Procedure
‘The researcher secured permission from the office of the school principal
for the conduct of this study. The researcher conducted orientation with the
participants about the nature, purpose, and benefits of the action research.
Using a questionnaire, quantitative data were gathered on the extent to which
students encountered the challenges and the extent to which students
manifested the coping mechanisms to the different challenges in the new normal
using modular approach. The first quarter grades of students were gathered to
study the learning outcomes in the new normal.
More so, the ethical considerations were strictly observed during the
conduct of this study, and no information leaked out that can be trackback to
them. The researcher ensured the anonymity of all the data gathered from the
respondents, like the responses to the survey questionnaire and their grade that
was used for the learning outcomes. Consent forms were given to the
respondents to ensure voluntary participation in this study.
Data Analysis
Descriptive statistics such as mean and standard deviation were utilized
in describing the extent to which the students encountered the challenges and
the extent to which they manifested the coping mechanisms to the different
challenges in the new normal using modular approach. The researcher
computed the grade point average and the standard deviation to get the level of
the students’ learning outcome in the new normal using the Modular Learning
Modality.
The Grading Scale with its corresponding descriptors were adapted from
the DepEd Memo No. 8, s. 2015 page 16. The following scale was used to
describe the level of students’ learning outcomes: 90-100% Outstanding; 85-89%
Very Satisfactory; 80-84% Satisfactory; 75-79% Fairly Satisfactory; and Below
75 Did Not Meet Expectations. Furthermore, the Pearson r correlation is used to
test the relationship between students’ coping mechanisms and their learning
outcomes in the new normal using the modular approach.
Results and Discussion
The extent to which students encountered the challenges in the
new normal using a Modular Approach. Table 1 shows the extent to which
students encountered the challenges in the new normal using modular approach
in the science subject. The data shows an overall mean score of 3.05, which is
interpreted as HIGH. This means that students encountered high challenges in
the new normal using the modular approach. Modular distance learning does
not provide immediate feedback compared to traditional instruction, where
students’ performance can be immediately assessed (Buselic 2017). He also
pointed out that students in distance learning courses do not get the experience
of practicing verbal interaction with professors and other students. Thus, social
interaction is limited in the distance learning. Marginalized and economically
disadvantaged students were challenged in distance learning when ICT is used
(Mahlangu 2018).
Region IX15
Table 1: The Extent to which Students Encountered the Challenges
in the New Normal Using a Modular Approach
I am experiencing challenges... M SD _| Interpretation
T. on acquiring knowledge and skills in
distance learning using a modular 3.08 | 0.47 High
approach.
2. on establishing communication with my
ee 2.98 | 0.58 High
3. on having Stable internet access intended
for distance learning education as a 2.83 0.78 High
supplement in learning.
7, on the use of phones, laptops, and
tablets for distance learning education. 3.15 | 0.70 High
5. in managing my time to accomplish all
the modules ahead of time. 3.00 | 0.78 High
6. in receiving Sufficient explanations of the
contents in the module. oe ee High
7. in understanding and following the
instruction in the module for each given 3.18 | 0.64 High
activity
8. on managing the stress caused by
community quarantine at home and 3.10 | 0.59 High
answering the modules.
9. on beating the deadlines and 3.10 0.67 High
requirements set by the school.
10. on establishing a network of
communication among my classmates for | 2.90 | 0.50 High
discussing ideas.
TI. on having a real-time update of my
learning progress.
12. on maintaining my interest in
accomplishing the modules.
TS. on seeking assistance from my parents
or household members to guide me in 2.93 | 0.83 High
answering my modules.
14. on assessing my own abilities without
3.13 0.52 High
3.15 | 0.53 High
the help of my teachers. 2.85 | 0.58 High
15. on handling responsibility formy own | 313 | 965 High
learning
Overall 3.05 0.63 High
‘Scale: 1.00 1.75 = Very Low; 1.76 — 2.50 = Low; 2.51 - 3.25 = High;
3.26 — 4.00 = Very High
Level of learning outcomes of students using a Modular Approach.
Table 2 shows that the level of students’ learning outcome in the new normal
using the modular approach is interpreted as Satisfactory with a Grade Point
Average of 83.43%. This means that students performed satisfactorily amidst the
challenges they encountered in learning the lessons in the new normal using the
modular approach.
ZamPen Research Journal | ISSN: 2984-6501Table 2: Level of Learning Outcomes of Students Using a Modular
Approach
Learning Outcome GPA_ | sD Interpretation
Science Subject 83.43% | 4.14 Satisfactory
Scale: 90-100% = Outstanding; 85-89% = Very Satisfactory;
80-84% = Satisfactory; 75-79% = Fairly Satisfactory;
below 75% = Did Not Meet Expectations
The extent to which students manifested the coping mechanisms to
the different challenges in the new normal using Modular Approach. Table 3
shows the extent to which students manifested the coping mechanisms to the
different challenges in the new normal using the modular approach with an
overall mean score of 3.19, which is interpreted as HIGH. It is also noted in the
table that there are indicators in the coping mechanism that is interpreted as Very
High, like item 1, "I use the internet to search additional information." Item 5 "I
set goals to help improve my interest.” Item 6 "I try to do the best I can, given the
constraints of the situation." and item 8 "I keep thinking that there's much I can
do to help myself." It is evident that students were able to overcome the challenges
posed in the new normal given the different constraints in this situation with the
different coping mechanisms to learn the lessons and maintain their interest in
accomplishing their modules.
Table 3: The Extent to which Students Manifested the Coping
Mechanisms to the Different Challenges in the New Normal Using a Modular
Approach
Tadicators M_|_SD_| Interpretation
T. Tuse the internet to search for additional aaa eg
information. e E ae
2. T seek out friends/classmates for discussion and
support. 2.95 | 0.88 High
3. I take a little time to relax, breathe, and unwind. | 3.25 | 0.71 High
4. I seek out support from my parents and other poaaes ar
household members. : : 8
5. I set goals to help improve my interest. 3.40 | 0.78 | Very High
6. Tiry to do the best I'can, given the constraints [359 | 9.60
of the situation. Very High
7. [find reasons to laugh. 2.90 | 0.87 High
8. [keep thinking that there's much I can do to 343 |0.71| very High
help myself. 3
9. I change my outlook on the situation and putit_ | 353 | o.g0 ae
in a better perspective. : - 2
10. I take some time off and get away from doing
my modules. 3.13 | 0.85 High
Overall 3.19 | 0.77 High
Scale: 1.00 — 1.75 = Very Low; 1.76 — 2.50 = Low; 2.51 — 3.25 = High;
3.26 - 4.00 = Very High
Test of the significant relationship between the coping mechanism
and learning outcome of students in the new normal using Modular
Approach. Using Pearson Correlation Test, Table 3 confirm that there is a
significant relationship between students’ learning outcomes and the coping
mechanism in the new normal using the modular approach with a p-value
of 0.000 and it also shows that there isa high positive correlation between the
Region IX17
student's learning outcome and their coping mechanisms in the new normal using
the modular approach which means that as the students were highly coping up
the learning outcomes also increases. This also shows that the learning outcome
of the students are dependent on their coping mechanisms that significantly
affects how they perform in the new normal
‘The positive and significant correlation between coping mechanisms and
students’ learning outcome is supported by the findings of Fuente et al. (2017)
highlighting better educational output when emotion-focused, problem-focused,
preventive, and proactive coping strategies of the learners are strengthened.
Moreover, the findings of Lapina (2018) warranted the reciprocal correlation
between coping strategies and students’ academic achievement.
Table 4: Testing Relationship between the Coping Mechanism and
Learning Outcome of Students in the New Normal Using Modular Approach
(N=40)
=
Variables Pearson r | Interpretation | 7... | Interpretation
Coping Mechanism and : an
Learning Outcome of 0.765 oe High | 9 000 Fricierit
Students in the New Normal eee cone
Correlation Coefficient Range: +0.91-1.00 = Very High; £0.71-0.90 = High;
£0.51-0.70 = Moderate; £0.31-0.50 = Low; 0.00-£0.30 = Negligible
The conduct of this action research allowed the researcher to reflect on his
key roles in the new normal, specifically providing technical assistance to the
students and accountability in teaching. Providing technical assistance to the
students plays a vital role for the students to grasp the concepts to their full
potential and reach their proximal development amidst the situation we are
having in the new normal so that students may acquire concrete ideas from their
teachers and is free from confusions about the science concepts. The teacher
should continue to test learning approaches and strategies that suit the new
normal for the teaching-learning process to continue.
More so, the accountability function intends to safeguard the exemplary
performance of the teacher to maximize student learning. It is the accountability
of the teacher to deliver the curriculum using the modular approach without
compromising the inquiry-based approach. Teachers need to ensure that the
quality of instruction in the new normal is the same as the face-to-face instruction
before COVID.
Conclusion and Recommendations
Based on the result of this study, it revealed that the students have
experienced several challenges in learning the lessons in the new normal
considering that face-to-face instructions are not possible and access to have on-
time instructions is limited. It also revealed that the learning outcomes of the
students have a satisfactory result, and there is a significant relationship to their
coping mechanisms. Moreover, it is also evident that there is a high positive
correlation between the coping mechanism and learning outcomes of students in
the new normal. Thus, it is highly encouraged that teachers should establish a
good rapport with the parents and students and provide individualized technical
assistance to the learners by any means of communication. Providing Learning
Activity Sheets (LAS) and other supplementary materials could also help enhance
the learning outcomes of the students. This study recommends that it would be
better if teachers provide on-time feedback to the learners in order not to bombard
them with lots of work in a particular time being. Teachers are ought to establish
open and relevant communication towards the students by giving them the
necessary encouragements and motivation that could facilitate them in sustaining
their interest in doing their learning modules, especially in these trying times.
ZamPen Research Journal | ISSN: 2984-6501References
Buselié, Marija. 2017. “Distance Learning - Concepts and Contributions.”
Oeconomica Jadertina 2 (1). University of Zadar: 23-34. doi:10.15291/
oec,209.
Department of Education. 2019. Briones: Ensure educational continuity amid
challenges. https: //[Link]/2019/11/20/briones-ensure-
educational-continuity-amid-challenges/
Department of Education Order No. 012, s. 2020, Adoption of the Basic
Education Learning Continuity Plan for School Year 2020-2021 in Light
of the COVID-19 Public “Health Emergency. _https://
[Link]/wp-content/uploads/2020/06 /
DO_s2020_012.pdf
Fernandez, Flavian Brian. 2017. “Action Research in the Physics Classroom: The
Impact of Authentic, Inquiry Based Learning or Instruction on the
Learning of Thermal Physics.” Asia-Pacific Science Education 3 (1). Brill
Rodopi. doi: 10.1186 /s41029-017-0014-z.
Fuente, Jestis de la, Maria Fernandez-Cabezas, Matilde Cambil, Manuel M. Vera,
Maria Carmen Gonzélez-Torres, and Raquel Artuch-Garde. 2017.
“Linear Relationship between Resilience, Learning Approaches, and
Coping Strategies to Predict Achievement in Undergraduate Students.”
Frontiers in Psychology 8 (JUN). Frontiers Media S.A. doi:10.3389/
fpsyg.2017.01039.
Lapina, Angelina. 2018. “Facilitating Coping Through Reflective Learning in Adult
Education: A Review of the Reciprocal Relationship Between Coping
and Learning.” Adult Learning 29 (4). SAGE Publications Inc.: 131-40.
doi:10.1177/1045159518776 126.
Larkin, Shirley. 2006. “Collaborative Group Work and Individual Development of
Metacognition in the Early Years.” Research in Science Education 36 (1-
2). Kluwer Academic Publishers: 7-27. doi:10.1007/s11165-006-8147-
ee
Mahlangu, Vimbi Petrus. 2018. “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Distance
Learning in Higher Education.” In Trends in E-Learning. InTech.
doi:10.5772/intechopen.75702.
Sahin, Mehmet. 2009. “Exploring University Students’ Expectations and Beliefs
about Physics and Physics Learning in a Problem-Based Learning
Context.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology
Education 5 (4). Modestum LTD: 321-33. doi:10.12973 /ejmste/75283.
Sejpal, Kandarp. 2013. “Modular Method of Teaching.” International Journal for
Research in Education 2 (2): 169-71. _hittps://
raijmronlineresearch files. [Link]/2017 /07/29_169-171-dr-
[Link].
Region IXEffectiveness of Flipped-Blended Classroom
Strategy in Teaching Mathematics
Francisco, Mark Andrew G.
Teacher III
Pangulayan Elementary School
Department of Education, Division of Zamboanga City
markandrew.franciso01@[Link]
09774274079
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of Flipped-blended classroom
strategy in teaching Grades 4 and 5 Mathematics in Pangulayan Elementary
School, SY 2019- 2020. The researcher adopted a quasi-experimental design using
pretest and posttest. It used a 50-item multiple-choice test in Mathematics which
was answered by the 30 Grade IV Pupils (control group) and 30 Grade V Pupils
(experimental group). The pupils’ pretest results of the control and experimental
groups had very poor performance in Mathematics, and they did not meet the
expectations to pass the subject. The posttest result of the control group was fairly
satisfactory performance in mathematics when the teacher used the traditional
method and satisfactory in the experimental group performance in
mathematics when the teacher used Flipped- Blended Classroom Teaching
Strategy. There is a significant difference in the posttest results of the control and
experimental group. This outcome suggests that the flipped-blended classroom
teaching strategy is effective in teaching mathematics because the pupils improved
their math performance after the teacher used the strategy. Thus, the study
recommends using a flipped-blended classroom teaching strategy as an
alternative measure to address the poor performance of the pupils in
mathematics. Mathematics teachers are encouraged to continue the study by using
the flipped-blended classroom strategy to other subject areas. Moreover, they can
continue the research study to include other subjects in the grade level.
Keywords: flipped-blended classroom teaching strategy; mathematics performance;
Skill acquisition; traditional learning
Introduction
New forms of education reflect digital changes surrounding us. Blended
learning becomes the essential part of the education process. Flipped classroom is
a recently emerged hybrid classroom model, which engenders tremendous interest
from teachers all over the world. It demonstrates the original education approach,
which combine existing components in an innovative design (Shnai 2017, 11).
The flipped classroom is considered as one of the latest and alternative e-
learning models that have made its way into the classroom worldwide. The
pedagogical approach highlights the reversal of teaching roles with homework. This
process allows learners to digest and develop content knowledge outside the four
corners of the classroom (Martin et al. 2015). As a consequence, the teachers can
optimize the teaching-learning process by using their classroom sessions as a
venue for learners to apply the information and learning through a series of
practical assignments (Baepler, Walker, and Drieses 2014, 11).
The flipped classroom, otherwise recognized as flipped learning, was
formally introduced by Bergmann and Sams in 2014. Now, it is widely utilized in
the academe as evidenced by the appealing adoption rate by educators and
academic institutions worldwide. The implementation of flipped classroom reduces
the burden of teachers in making the students understand the concepts and
improves student’s digital knowledge, creative thinking and learning performance
(Alalmai, Arun, and Aarif 2020, 9425)
ZamPen Research Journal | ISSN: 2984-650120
Flipped Classroom learning reverses the delivery method in traditional
learning. Traditional delivery of learning is reading, watching, and absorbing learning
material in class and being tasked with work to complete at home. In a flipped
learning classroom, teachers prepare audio or video lectures for learners to watch at
home, on their own time. The time in class is spent working through the concepts
being delivered with the guidance of an instructor (Lo and Hew 2017, 11).
Complementary to all of this is an online platform where learners and the instructor
can discuss with one another (Honeycutt and Garette 2013, 15).
Moreover, the flipped classroom provides the teachers a different role. “In a
flipped classroom, teachers do not give direct instruction. Their role becomes one of
the facilitators who sets up the content, maps out homework, and provides a
welcoming learning space that students can explore in” (Roles in a Flipped
Classroom: Teachers & Students 2017).
On the other hand, Kim et al. (2016) considered Blended Learning as a
combination of online learning and face-to-face learning (often referred to as
“traditional learning"). Blended learning involves both online and offline learning.
Both online and traditional teaching methods are employed to provide students with
a more effective learning experience. Teachers would commonly utilize online learning
components such as educational videos, games, online learning materials, and
podcasts. Blended learning is a pedagogical approach in which a student learns at
least in part through the delivery of content and instruction via digital and online
media with some element of student control over time, place, path, or pace. This mode
allows students to create a customized and integrated approach to their learning.
Blended learning is proven effective when combined with the flipped-classroom
approach to teaching (Purba 2021).
Sometimes, it is difficult to distinguish the difference between Blended
Learning and Flipped Classroom because they have much in common. Blended
learning is characterized by the combination of the in class or face-to-face education
with online activities which could be applied in a flipped classroom. The role of the
teachers in the flipped classroom is to create contents of the lesson so that students
can study the material first. Thus, students who accessed the learning material
before going to school can engage creatively and interact actively (Capone, De
Caterina, and Mazza 2019, 108). In this context, the teacher becomes a support and
facilitator and helps students in the transition process from knowledge to acquisition
of skills and competencies (Lou et al. 2012, 107).
In Zamboanga City, particularly in Pangulayan Elementary School,
Mercedes District, since the school is located far- in upper high land areas, it is a big
problem for the learners to access online teaching. One implementation of flipped-
blended classroom learning is using technology in the classroom. In the traditional
learning environment, students attend a lecture and then do assignments on their
own. The idea behind the flipped-blended is to have students do passive learning
activities (like watching a recorded lecture) at home, reserving classroom time for
active learning. This process allows students to apply new knowledge in the presence
of an instructor and will enable them to collaborate with their peers. This model
increases student-instructor and student-student engagement. As observed by the
teacher, Grades IV and V pupils of Pangulayan Elementary School, Mercedes
District.
Another dilemma the teacher faces is the result of Mathematics in 2018
Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), wherein from a 489 OECD
average, the Filipino students ranked very low in Mathematics and Science subjects,
with 353 points and 357 points, respectively. Moreover, the Philippines ranked in
the low 70s in the 2018 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), a
student Assessment of 15-years-old learners across 79 countries done by the
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
‘The result of PISA urged the researcher to do an innovative way of teaching
mathematics to grade school pupils. Hence, flipped learning, also known as the
flipped
Region IXBa
classroom, is used as the teaching strategy in presenting mathematics lectures to
Grade IV and V pupils. This strategy will decide between the technology and face-to-
face elements of the learning experience. A learner is asked to watch an e-learning
video or participate in another online learning exercise before coming to class. In the
classroom, the new materials are explored at length. In most cases, the knowledge
learned online is applied in the classroom. For this reason, the researcher embarked
on this study to determine the effectiveness of Flipped-blended classroom strategy in
teaching mathematics for grade IV and V pupils.
Innovation, Intervention, and Strategy. The intervention utilized in this
study is the Flipped-Blended Strategy. The Flipped-blended strategy is vital because
it is designed to address the active and maximum participation of pupils in learning
mathematical concepts. It is interesting to dig into this teaching strategy because it is
expected to improve the performance level of pupils in Mathematics by allowing them
to learn at their own pace and encouraging them to engage with lecture material
actively
Based on the study by Nouri (2016) on the influence of flipped classroom
especially for low achievers, it was found that majority of the students had a positive
attitude towards the use of flipped classroom. And this positive attitude was strongly
correlated to perceptions of increased motivation, increased learning, effective
learning, and engagement. Flipped learning strategy was more effective than the
conventional teaching method in terms of developing students’ research skills (SRS)
(Mahasneh 2020).
There may be a lot of circumstances that create difficulty for pupils to
improve performance in mathematics, such as lack of interest in the subject,
laziness to study, and even parents’ support at home. All of these things may lead to
one factor, the strategy to use in the classroom. With this notion, this research topic
greatly impacted researchers with a greater understanding of the processes involved
in establishing an environment that would enhance student performance using the
flipped-blended learning approach,
Pangulayan Elementary School, as a non-central school, has been sending
pupils to the mathematics competition and sometimes reached the division level. It is
expected that the school caters to pupils with good performance, especially in
Mathematics. However, it is found that 80% of the pupils perform poorly in solving
mathematical problems. It is therefore recommended that research must be
conducted among the target respondents of the study. Circumstances significantly
affect the school, especially in the National Achievement Test (NAT). It was therefore
decided that teachers should act and look for solutions that will improve the
performance of pupils in Mathematics. After identifying factors that play a significant
role in this problem, the Flipped-Blended strategy will be employed in the teaching-
learning activities of Grade IV and V pupils.
The flipped-blended strategy was conducted during the mathematics
classes of Grade IV and V to see the effectiveness between the control and
experimental groups as described: (1.) The control group with a traditional
discussion of the lesson during the mathematics period and the experimental group
watched videos related to the lesson; (2.) Activities were given to both groups after
the discussions by solving drills and mathematical problems; (3.) Provided homework
videos to pupils in the flipped-blended strategy and written work for the control
group; and (4) Activity was recorded and documented for one month. After the fourth
quarter of this activity, the flipped-blended was given if there were no changes in the
data.
Action Research Questions. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness
of Flipped- blended classroom strategy in teaching mathematics for Grade IV and V
pupils.
Specifically, this study sought to answer the following problems:
1. What is the pretest result of the control and experimental groups in
mathematics?
ZamPen Research Journal | ISSN: 2984-6501What is the posttest result of the control group in mathematics?
What is the posttest result of the experimental group in mathematics after the
flipped-blended classroom teaching strategy was used?
Is there a significant difference in the pretest of the control and experimental
groups in mathematics?
Is there a significant difference in the posttest of the control and experimental
group?
ow
a oF
Research Method
Research Design
In this study, the researcher utilized a quasi-experimental design of research
that determined the effectiveness of flipped-blended classroom strategy in teaching
mathematics for Grade IV and V pupils for a period of one quarter of the school year
2019 -2020. The pupils answered the 50 items questions about mathematics for
Grade IV and V before and after the duration of the experiment. After answering the
pretest, the teacher used the flipped-blended classroom strategy in teaching
mathematics to the experimental group. The result of the posttest was taken from
the experimental group.
Specifically, the two-group pretest-post-test design was used to measure
the before and after the treatment (Price et al. 2017).
Research Participants
The participants of this study were sixty (60) Grade IV and V pupils of
Pangulayan Elementary School, Mercedes District, Division of Zamboanga City. The
purposive sampling technique was used in choosing the respondents of this study.
These two intact sections of Grade IV and V comprise of thirty (30) learners for each
grade level. These participants answered a 50-mulitple choice test in Mathematics
to determine their level of competence in the subject for pre-test and post.
Research Instrument
The researcher had formulated a 50-item multiple-choice test in
Mathematics. It was pilot tested on the non-respondents for item analysis. This was
referred to the school head and master teacher at the school for validity. After all
suggestions and recommendations were done properly in the test, the instrument
was subjected to a reliability test.
Data Gathering Procedure
Data gathering was conducted after the approval of the research proposal.
The researcher secured permission from the Schools Division Superintendent
through a letter to gather data from the Grade IV and V pupils of the school. The
data gathering started after the approval of the study by presenting the permission
letter to the District Supervisor and school principal of the said school. The
researcher explained the approved letter to the principal.
The researcher conducted a series of conditioning activities on the
resumption of classes for the fourth quarter. The respondents were oriented that
they were part of an educational experiment to be conducted by the researcher.
Consent was given by the parents/guardian for the inclusion of the participants in
the study. The researcher administered a 50-item multiple-choice test to control
and experimental groups during the next meeting with the respondents. The
respondents gave approximately an hour to answer after administering the pretest
materials. The researcher performed routine activities by using a flipped-blended
teaching strategy. This strategy served as the treatment. After the intervention,
posttest materials were administered and collected personally by the researcher.
Afterward, the researcher submitted the tabulated data to the statistician for
statistical treatment. Lastly, the researcher did the discussion and interpretation of
data.
Region IX23,
In compliance with Research Ethics Protocol, the researcher obtained
informed assent through the parents/guardian of the participants. This ethical
consideration ensured that the survey respondents, with the consent of their
parents/guardian, signify their awareness and understanding of the study
objectives, their agreement to participate as survey respondents, their freedom to
disclose or not to disclose information, their freedom to stop their participation
anytime if they do not feel comfortable, their right to the confidentiality of
information and anonymity of their identity as respondents of the researchers,
their right to understand that the study is about testing the effectiveness of flipped
-blended classroom in mathematics and have the opportunity ask questions, their
right to know its benefits and the activities expected of them in the study.
Data Analysis
The researcher used the percentage mean to determine the pretest and
posttest of the control and experimental groups in mathematics. Moreover, an
independent t- test was used to determine the significant difference in the pretest
of the control and experimental groups. It is also employed to test the significant
difference in the results of the posttest of the control and experimental groups
after the flipped-blended classroom teaching strategy was used.
Results and Discussion
Table 1 shows the Pretest of the control and experimental groups in
Mathematics for the Grade 1V and Grade V pupils. It is evident in the table that
the pretest result of the control group has a mean of 13.87, which had an
equivalent rating of 64% that was verbally described as did not meet expectations.
This means that the pupils in the control group did not meet the expectations to
pass the mathematics quiz.
Table 1: Pretest of the Control and Experimental Groups in Mathematics
Equivalent
| Group Mean a Description
Controlled Group 13.87 | 64 Did Not Meet Expectations
ExperimentalGroup | 15.77 _| 66 Did not Meet Expectations
Legend (DO No. 8, s. 2015):
90-100 =Outstanding 85-89= Very satisfactory 80-84= Satisfactory
75-79= Fairly satisfactory Below 75 = Did not meet expectations
Moreover, the table also revealed that the pretest result of the pupils from
the experimental group had a mean of 15.77, which had an equivalent rating of 66%
that was verbally described as did not meet expectations. This means that the pupils
in the experimental group did not meet the expectations to pass the mathematics
iz.
: This outcome implies that the pupils from both groups had very poor
performance in Mathematics. Several factors such as learners’ interest, attitude
towards mathematics, and insufficient mathematical practice possibly contributed to
the pupils’ poor performance in mathematics. This finding is supported by Hossain
(2018), who stated that the Math achievement of American students in 2015 fell again
for the second time on a significant international benchmark, as stated in the Program.
for International Student Assessment (PISA). American students stagnated in
reading and science proficiency, while their Math performance declined. Additionally,
according to the study of Casinillo (2019) on Factors Affecting the Failure Rate in
Mathematics: The Case of Visayas State University (VSU) revealed that there were
five main factors affecting the failure rate in mathematics that does not follow a
uniform distribution namely: poor study habits, negative learning attitudes, social
environment, emotional problem, and financial problem.
ZamPen Research Journal | ISSN: 2984-6501Table 2: Posttest of Control Group in Mathematics
[ Mean [ Equivalent Rating | Description |
| 25.13 [75 | Fairly satisfactory |
Legend (DO No. 8, s. 2015)
90-100 =Outstanding; 85-89= Very satisfactory; 80-84= Satisfactory;
75-79= Fairly satisfactory; Below 75 = Did not meet expectations
Table 2 shows the posttest of the control group in mathematics with a mean
of 25.13 with the equivalent rating of 75% that was verbally described as fairly
satisfactory. This means that the pupils in the control group had fairly satisfactory
performance in mathematics when the teacher used the traditional method.
The pupils in the control group had improved a little in their performance
in mathematics by 11%. This implies the traditional method is effective in teaching
where leamers sit silently and passively inside the classrooms and the teacher
actively performs the lecturing. Thus, the pupils inactively attend in the learning
process. They talk and engage in the learning process when approached and
required to perform as they are instructed, while in a conventional classroom
setting, the learning abilities of the majority of the learners are restricted only to
duplicating the writings on the board. Hence, the learners are not empowered to
effectively handle the data through thoughts, evaluation, and investigation. Because
of this constrained intellectual capability, learners lose interest in learning
Table 3: Posttest Result of the Experimental Group in Mathematics
after the Flipped-Blended Classroom Teaching Strategy
Mean Equivalent Description
30.70 80 Satisfactory
Legend (DO No. 8, s. 2015)
90-100 =Outstanding; 85-89= Very satisfactory, 80-84= Satisfactory;
75-79= Fairly satisfactory, Below 75 = Did not meet expectations
Table 3 shows the posttest of the experimental group in mathematics with a
mean of 28.70 with the equivalent rating of 80% that was verbally described as
satisfactory. This means that the pupils in the experimental group had satisfactory
performance in mathematics when the teacher used Flipped- Blended Classroom
Teaching Strategy.
Activity-based teaching is a strategy focused on the idea that learners
should be included through activities. It is adopted by a teacher to emphasize his
or her teaching technique through activities in which the learners are motivated
and empowered to learn. This learning approach enables the learner to learn
through effective inclusion physically and rationally. Activity-based learning is
characterized by meaningful school learning settings in which the learner creates
Mathematical ideas through dynamic contribution. This procedure may include
controlling physical materials, using games, or participating in experimentations
with physical items.
Multiple data collection methods were employed including observation,
written journals and tests. The data were then analyzed both quantitatively and
qualitatively. The findings showed that flipped classroom promotes independent
learning, with the type of classroom encouraging students to work together with
other peers and improved learning awareness. However, some challenges were
highlighted in flipped classroom application such as technical issues, editing
recording skills, and it was time consuming. Recommendations are offered in
reference to the findings.
The findings are supported by Umam et al. (2019) who pointed out
that flipped classrooms promote independent learning, with the type of classroom
Region IX2
encouraging students to collaborate with peers. They found out that
performance of the students became better because the students showed
interest in learning; likewise, they were motivated to deal with problems and
numbers. However, their study highlighted some difficulties in flipped classroom
application, such as technical issues and editing recording skills, which were
time-consuming.
Table 4: Significant Difference in the Pretest of the Control and Experimental
Groups in Mathematics
Variables Mean t-value | p-value | Interpretation |
Control group 13.87
ianecinenial oun 1577 1.876 0.071 Not Significant
“Significant level at @ = 0.05
Table 4 shows the significant difference in the Pretest of the control and
Experimental Groups in mathematics. The table revealed that the Pretest of the
control and experimental groups’ t-value = 1.876 with a p-value of 0.071, which is
greater than the significant alpha value of 0.05, indicated that the significant
difference does not exist. Hence the posited null hypothesis is accepted because
there is no significant difference in the Pretest of the control and experimental
groups in mathematics.
This means that the pupils from the control and experimental groups did
not meet the expectations of passing the mathematics quiz given in the pretest.
These outcomes are similar with the results of 2021 Regional Achievement Test of
DepEd RO- IX which posted the low Mathematics proficiency level of 55.40% of
Grade 6 learners (DepEd Regional Office IX BE-LCP, 2021).
Haw, King, and Trinidad (2021) pointed out that the PISA report of 2018
showed that the Philippines ranked 353 in Mathematics which was recorded as
very low. Over 80% of students in the Philippines did not reach a minimum level of
proficiency in mathematics, which is one of the most significant shares of low
performers amongst all PISA-participating countries and economies.
Table 5: Significant Difference in the Post-test of Control and
Experimental Groups
Variables Mean tvalue p-value _| Interpretation
Control group Esco 0.135 0.003* Significant
Experimental group _| 28.70
“Significant level at @ = 0.05
Table 5 shows the significant difference in the post-test of control and
experimental groups after the flipped-blended classroom teaching strategy was
used. The post-test of control and experimental groups’ t-value = 0.135 with a p-
value of 0.003, which is less than the significant value of @ = 0.05, indicated that
a significant difference exists. Hence the posited null hypothesis is rejected
because there is a considerable difference in the posttest of control and
experimental groups after the flipped-blended classroom teaching strategy was
used.
This means that the pupils from the control group had fairly satisfactory
performance in mathematics, whereas the pupils from the experimental group had
a satisfactory performance. This means that the flipped-blended classroom
teaching strategy is effective in teaching mathematics because the pupils improve
their math performance after the teacher uses the technique.
These findings are supported by Karabak and Polat (2019). They concluded
that the academic achievement levels of the students in the flipped classroom
ZamPen Research Journal | ISSN: 2984-650126
model using ARCS (attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction) motivation
strategies were significantly higher than those of the students in the distance
education classroom model and the traditional classroom model. In addition, the
training process did not lead to a significant change in the motivation of the students
in the traditional classroom model and distance education classroom model. Still, it
did lead to a substantial difference in the students’ motivation in the flipped
classroom model.
Another study by Talan and Gulsecen (2019) proved that a flipped
classroom strategy is effective. The learners in Experiment-I discovered the
theoretical aspect of the course through the materials in the online learning
environment, which were prepared before the class study time in context with the
“flipped classroom." The students in Experiment-II unraveled the theoretical
aspect of the course in the classroom using the blended learning model. They
performed active learning activities outside of the class study time. The students in
the control group discovered the theoretical aspect of the subject in the classroom
in consonance to the current curriculum and conducted active learning activities in
their homes. They found that the scores for the students in the experimental
groups concerning academic achievement and engagement were substantially
higher than the performance for those in the control group. There was a statistically
significant the difference between the groups. It was further disclosed that the
students were also generally satisfied with the flipped classroom
Conclusions and Recommendations
The study seeks to determine the effectiveness of flipped-blended
classroom strategy in teaching mathematics. In sum, the flipped-blended
classroom strategy had consistently showed a satisfactory performance to pupils
in mathematics and teachers in teaching the subject. This means that the flipped-
blended classroom teaching strategy is effective in teaching mathematics because
the pupils have improved their performance after the intervention was used.
The researcher resolved that the flipped blended teaching strategy amidst
the peril of the COVID-19 pandemic call for the collaboration of DepEd officials
that they may recommend teachers for seminars and training on using the flipped-
blended teaching strategy to enhance teaching performance, Public-School Division
Supervisors can initiate the monitoring plan to address the low math performance
of the students. They must recommend the utilization of a flipped-blended
classroom teaching strategy as alternative measures to address the poor
performance of the pupils in mathematics, school heads should encourage
teachers to use the flipped-blended classroom teaching strategy in teaching
mathematics, teachers may suggest that the school heads provide technology and
classroom materials. They may ask the school heads to provide internet
connectivity so they can help abreast themselves with the new trends in education
and embolden pupils to learn mathematics effectively by using the flipped-blended
classroom. They may study mathematics independently to be motivated to
understand and appreciate mathematics.
Region IXReferences
Alalmai, Ali A., A. Arun and Mohd Aarif. 2020. "Implementing Possibilities and
Perspectives of Flipped Learning in Hotel Management Institutions.” Test
Engineering and Management 83: 9421-9427.
Baepler, Paul, Jay Walker and Michelle Driesses. 2014. “It’s not about seat
time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning”.
Bergmann, Jonathan and Aaron Sams. 2014. “Flipped learning: Gateway to
student engagement.” International Society for Technology in Education.
[Link]
TDFlippedLearning.p df
Capone, Robert, Patrizia De Caterina and Giustina Anna Gerarda Mazza. 2017.
Blended Learning, Flipped Classroom and Virtual Environment: Challenges
and Opportunities for the 21st Century Students. 9th International
Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, (pp. 1-110).
Barcelona. doi:10.21125/edulearn.2017.0985
Casinillo, Leomarich. 2019. “Factors affecting the failure rate in mathematics: the
case of Visayas State University (VSU}.” Review of Socio-Economic Research
and Development Studies 3.1: 1-18.
Haw, Joseph Y., Ronnel B. King and Jose Eos R. Trinidad. 2021. "Need supportive
teaching is associated with greater reading achievement: What the
Philippines can learn from PISA 2018.” International Journal of Educational
Research 110: 101864.
Honeycutt, Sarah C. and Patrick I. Garette. 2013. The flipped approach to a
learner- centered class. (whitepaper). Magna Publications.
Hossain, Anowar. 2018. "The Implementation of Learning Together in Improving
Students’ Mathematical Performance." International Journal of instruction
11.2: 483-496.
Karabatak, Songiil and Hakan Polat. 2019. “The effects of the flipped classroom
model designed according to the ARCS motivation strategies on the students’
motivation and academic achievement levels.”
Kelly, Dana, Christine Winquist Nord, Frank Jenkins, Jessica Ying Chan and
David Kastberg. 2013. Performance of US 15-Year-Old Students in
Mathematics, Science, and Reading Literacy in an International Context.
First Look at PISA 2012. NCES 2014-024. National Bureau of Economic
Research.
Kim, Min Kyu, So Mi Kim, Otto Khera and Joan Getman. 2014. “The experience of
three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploratory of design
principles.” The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37-50. doi: 10.1016/
[Link].2014.04.003.
Lo, Chong, K and Khe F. Hew. 2017. “A critical review of flipped classroom
challenges in K-12 education: possible solutions and recommendations for
future research.” Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning ,
pp. 1-50.
Lou, ShiJ, Nai C. Chen, Huei H. Tsai, Kou H. Tseng and Ru C. Shih. 2012. “Using
Blended Creative Teaching: Improving a Teacher Education Course on
Designing Materials for Young Children.” Australasian Journal Of
Educational, Technology, 28 (5), 776-792.
Mahasneh, Omar M. 2020. "The effectiveness of flipped learning strategy in the
development of scientific research skills in procedural research course
among higher education diploma students." Research in Learning
Technology 28.
Martin, Cesar T., Christian Acal, Mohammed E. Homrani and Angel C. Estrada .
2015. Implementation of the flipped classroom and its longitudinal impact
on improving academic performance. Educational technology research and
development, pp. 1- 44.
ZamPen Research Journal | ISSN: 2984-6501