0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views4 pages

Interest Rate Futures Hedging Strategies

1. The document discusses interest rate hedging strategies using interest rate futures and forward rate agreements (FRAs). 2. It provides an example of hedging a company's $5 million exposure to interest rate risk on commercial paper using Eurodollar futures contracts. 3. Additional questions provide examples of hedging a company's rolling $20 million bank bill facility using 90-day bank accepted bill (BAB) futures contracts and FRAs. The outcomes under different interest rate scenarios are calculated.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views4 pages

Interest Rate Futures Hedging Strategies

1. The document discusses interest rate hedging strategies using interest rate futures and forward rate agreements (FRAs). 2. It provides an example of hedging a company's $5 million exposure to interest rate risk on commercial paper using Eurodollar futures contracts. 3. Additional questions provide examples of hedging a company's rolling $20 million bank bill facility using 90-day bank accepted bill (BAB) futures contracts and FRAs. The outcomes under different interest rate scenarios are calculated.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Topic 4: Interest Rate Futures

Suggested Solutions to Tutorial Questions


Hull (2017) Ch. 6

Problem 6.16

The treasurer can hedge the company’s exposure by shorting Eurodollar futures contracts. The
Eurodollar futures position leads to a profit if rates rise and a loss if they fall.
= 5m – 4.820 < 5m - 4.720

Date of issue 90 days 90 days

Feb 20 July 17 Jan


Eurodollar contracts mature 180 days

No of contracts = 5,000,000/1,000,000 = 5 contracts x 2 = 10 contracts


The contract price of a Sept Eurodollar futures contract is $980,000. Note that the Eurodollar price of
92.00 implies a yield to maturity of 8% per annum or a discount of $25 per basis point times 800 basis
points = $20,000 or (8% x $1m x 90/360).
P = 100 – R
R = 100 – P = 100 – 92 (P) = 8% (R)
1,000,000
= 980,392.16 ≈ 980,000
1 + .08 𝑥 90⁄360

The number of contracts that should be shorted is, therefore,

4,820,000
𝑥 2 = 9.84 ≈ 10 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑠
980,000

$4,820,000 / $980,000 = 4.92 or for, practical purposes, 5 contracts


Note that the duration of the commercial paper is twice that of the of the Eurodollar deposit
underlying the Eurodollar futures contract. Therefore, we need to multiply our answer by 2 which gives
an answer of 9.84 contracts (or 10 contracts rounded up).
For example, if Sept Eurodollars were quoted at 91.00 on July 17, the borrower would gain 100 basis
points x $25 per basis point x 10 contracts = $25,000 on the short Eurodollars position. This would
offset the incremental interest expense of a rise of 1 percent on the $5m loan ($5m x 1% x 0.5 years =
$25,000).

1
Problem 6.25

(a) The company can lock in a 3-month rate of 100 − 98.4 =1.60%. The rate it pays is therefore locked
in at 1.6 + 0.5 = 2.1%.
8,000,000
(b) The company should sell (i.e., short) 8 contracts = .
1,000,000
If rates increase, the futures quote goes down and the company gains on the futures. Similarly, if
rates decrease, the futures quote goes up and the company loses on the futures.
(c) The final settlement price is 100 − 1.30 = 98.70.
The futures contract is settled in December, but the interest rate on a loan starting in December is
paid three months later.

Additional Questions

1. You have just bought a December 90 Day BAB futures contract at a price of 95.22.
Immediately after your purchase, the Reserve Bank announces a surprise increase in the
cash rate to 5.00%. The yield on spot 90 day BAB’s rises to 5.03% and the December
futures contract price falls to 94.90. Calculate your gain or loss on this trade (use formula
not approximation technique).

Obligation to buy at 95.22 = $988,351 (value of contract)


Closed out contract at 94.90 = $987,581 (value of contract)
Therefore loss = $ 770

P = 100 – r

95.22 = 100 – r

R = 100 – 95.22 = 4.78%

P = 100 – r

94.90 = 100 – r
r = 100 – 94.9 = 5.1%

1,000,000 1,000,000

90
1 + .0478 𝑥 ⁄365 1 + .051 𝑥 90⁄365

= 988.351 - 987,581

= $770 (Loss)

Check approximation: -32 points x $24 per point (approx) = - $768 (Loss)

2. Answer (c)
3. You observe the following information relevant to Australian conditions:
Forward rate agreements available today:
3 x 6 FRA = 5.10%
6 x 9 FRA = 5.20%
90 day Bank Bill futures quotes maturing in:
3 months = 94.90
6 months = 94.75
Your company has a rolling 90 day bank bill facility with its bank. It has just issued 200 x
$100,000, 90 day bank bills at Bank Bill Rate (BBR) + 1.5% and intends to roll over this debt at
the end of each quarter for the next three quarters. Company management is concerned about
the possible effect of forecasts for rising interest rates over the forthcoming year and has
instructed you to propose interest rate hedging strategies using (i) forward rate agreements and
(ii) bank bill futures.
Construct appropriate hedges for the next two rollover dates and evaluate the outcomes if the
BBR is (a) 5.02% in 3 months time, and (b) 5.50% in 6 months time (assume that 90 BAB
futures close 94.98 in 3 months and 94.50 in 6 months time).

(a) Hedging the first rollover using a Forward Rate Agreement

Forward rate agreements available today:


3 x 6 FRA = 5.10%
6 x 9 FRA = 5.20%
90 day Bank Bill futures quotes maturing in:
3 months = 94.90 = 100 – r , where r = 100 – 94.9 =5.1%
6 months = 94.75 = 100 – r , where r = 100 – 94.75 = 5.25%

BBR is (a) 5.02% in 3 months time, and


(b) 5.50% in 6 months time (assume that 90 BAB futures close 94.98 in 3 months and
94.50 in 6 months time).

To hedge, buy a 3 X 6 FRA at 5.10% with face value of $20m = 200 x 100,000 = Long position
in the FRA
Payoff from FRA =
FV FV
Payoff = −
 days   days 
1 + frate  1 + r 
 DIY   DIY 
20,000,000 20,000,000
= -
1+.051 𝑥 90⁄365 1+.0502 𝑥 90⁄365

= 19,751,617 – 19,755,467 = – $3,850

The payoff from the FRA was negative because the company was able to rollover its debt at
5.02% on the rollover date which was below the rate of 5.1% locked in by the FRA. – that is, the
company must pay the bank $3850. All up, the company’s rate of interest for the 90 day period
will be 5.1% which is the rate locked in by the FRA
Hedging the second rollover with a Forward Rate Agreement
Go long on 6 X 9 FRA at 5.20% with face value of $20m.

Payoff from FRA =


FV FV
Payoff = −
 days   days 
1 + frate  1 + r 
 DIY   DIY 
20,000,000 20,000,000

1+ .052 𝑥 90⁄365 1+ .055 𝑥 90⁄365

= 19,746,808 – 19,732,397 = + $14,411

The payoff from the FRA was positive because the company rolled over its debt at 5.5% on the
rollover date which was above the rate of 5.2% locked in by the FRA. – that is, the bank must
pay the company $14,411. All up, the company’s rate of interest for the 90 day period will be
5.2% which is the rate locked in by the FRA

(b) Hedge first roll-over with Bank Bill futures

Short 20 x 3 month bank bill futures contract at 94.90 = 5.10%


Why short? - We have a future obligation to sell bank bills and are concerned about interest
rates (YTM) rising. Therefore, profit from a short position in futures but pay higher rate in
physical market.
Spot and futures price must converge, so assume futures price to close out is 5.02%
Loss on futures
= BB at 5.10% - BB at 5.02
= $20m / [1 + 0.0510{90/365} ]
= $20m/[1 + .0510(90/365)] - $20m/[1 + .0502(90/365)]
= 19,751,617 – 19,755,467 = – $3,850

Hedge second roll-over with Bank Bill futures

Short 20 x 3 month bank bill futures contract at 94.75 = 5.25%

Spot and futures price must converge, so futures price to close out is 5.50%
Profit on futures
= BB at 5.25 - BB at 5.50% -
= 19,744,405 - 19,732,397 –= + $12,008
Note: this answer is lower compared to the FRA hedge because the interest rate locked into
with BAB futures was higher at 5.25% (compared with 5.2% for the FRA). On this basis, the
FRA was the better (cheaper) hedging instrument to choose.

Common questions

Powered by AI

A company might prefer forward rate agreements over bank bill futures if it can secure more favorable upfront terms and a lower locked-in rate. FRAs provide precise rate locking for specific timeframes, as seen when a company avoided higher costs with a 5.2% FRA versus a higher effective rate with futures at 5.25%, resulting in a lower interest expense and a favorable payoff outcome. The FRA offers better cost certainty compared to the potential variability and higher rates associated with futures .

The duration reflects the time sensitivity of an investment or liability to interest rate changes. In determining the number of Eurodollar futures contracts needed for hedging, it's critical to consider the duration mismatch. For instance, if the duration of the commercial paper is twice that of the Eurodollar deposit, this mismatch doubles the needed contracts to align hedging efficacy with interest exposure, implying that more contracts should be shorted to manage the risk effectively .

The treasurer can hedge the company's exposure by shorting Eurodollar futures contracts. If interest rates increase, the futures position would become profitable, offsetting potential higher costs due to rising rates on the company's debt. Specifically, the company should short 10 contracts if the position involves $5 million, considering factors like yield to maturity and contract price, implying a discount of $20,000 per basis point .

Forward rate agreements (FRAs) facilitate precise interest rate locking for specific future periods, offering fixed cost certainty that futures might not. The payoff from an FRA depends directly on the agreed rate and the actual benchmarks at settlement, allowing tailored cost management per the company's exposure level. In contrast, futures expose companies to market variability, requiring more active position management and potentially less predictable costs. For example, an FRA capped at 5.1% ensures cost predictability for the hedged period despite subsequent BBR fluctuations .

Interest rate hedging instruments, such as forward rate agreements and bank bill futures, enable corporations to manage exposure to fluctuating interest rates. By locking in rates, corporations can protect against adversities such as rising interest rates that increase borrowing costs. These instruments provide financial predictability and cost stability, which are crucial for corporate treasury management. For instance, FRAs lock in the rate over the term, while futures involve strategic positioning and market timing to optimize outcomes .

When the Reserve Bank announces a surprise increase in the cash rate to 5.00%, the yield on spot 90-day BABs rises to 5.03%, causing the December futures contract price to fall to 94.90. This change results in a loss of $770 for the position because the contract value decreases from $988,351 to $987,581 .

Shorting Eurodollar futures involves determining the number of contracts based on exposure. First, calculate the amount needed to hedge by dividing the exposure by the contract price. For example, for $5 million exposure and a $980,000 contract price, the calculation suggests about 10 contracts. Then, adjusting for duration relative to the underlying deposit term results in shorting the futures. Position management considers market movements, with a gain if rates increase and a loss if they decrease .

Using FRAs to hedge the rollover of a 90-day bank bill facility allows the company to lock in interest rates. For example, buying a 3 x 6 FRA locks in an interest rate of 5.10% for a future period. If the actual BBR is lower than the rate locked in by the FRA, the company incurs a payoff cost (e.g., a $3,850 loss on a $20 million face value). Conversely, if the actual BBR is higher, a FRA might result in a gain, thereby stabilizing overall financing costs .

The benefits of locking in interest rates with Eurodollar futures include hedging against interest rate increases, potentially offsetting higher borrowing costs and stabilizing cash flows. However, risks include potential losses if interest rates fall, as a short futures position would result in losses if rates decrease. The company must accurately predict interest rate trends and be willing to take the chance that the locked-in rate could be worse than actual future rates .

When using bank bill futures to hedge, the concept of convergence requires the futures price to adjust closely to the spot interest rate over time. For instance, using a 3-month bank bill at 94.90 (5.10% yield) versus 5.02% BBR results in a loss. However, a strategic short position could profit if future interest rates converge at a level higher than the locked rate. The specific loss or gain when rolling over debt using futures rests on this convergence, affecting the hedging outcome .

You might also like