Oldest Communication Model Explained
Uploaded by
liezel narvaezOldest Communication Model Explained
Uploaded by
liezel narvaezCommon questions
Powered by AIUnderstanding the arbitrary nature of symbols in verbal communication is crucial because it underpins the notion that words are merely representations without inherent meanings. This recognition helps communicators appreciate context and convention in language, acknowledging that meanings arise from agreed social constructs, which are variable and subject to change across different settings and over time .
Non-verbal communication regulates interactions by signaling when someone should begin or end speaking, or adjust their communication pace. For instance, in high-context cultures, non-verbal cues might provide subtle guidance without overt explanation, like eye contact and proxemics. Cultural variations exist, such as in Saudi Arabia and the Philippines, where eye contact holds different meanings and regulates communication differently; in Saudi Arabia, it may suggest rudeness, while it's considered polite in the Philippines .
The transactional model allows individuals to serve as both sender and receiver simultaneously. This simultaneity means that communication involves constant feedback, with messages sent back and forth concurrently. In doing so, it reflects real-life conversation dynamics more accurately, where participants are actively engaged and responsive to each other's exchanges at the same time .
Cultural factors significantly influence non-verbal communication cues. For example, in the US, smiling is generally a sign of friendliness, whereas in Japan it's seen as inappropriate when directed at strangers. Eye contact varies widely; it is considered polite in the Philippines but rude in Saudi Arabia. These cultural norms dictate how facial expressions and eye contact are interpreted and used during interactions .
Schramm's interactive model emphasizes the importance of a shared 'field of experience' or frame of reference for effective communication. This means that for a message to be understood similarly by both the sender and the receiver, they must share common experiences or knowledge that allow them to interpret the message correctly .
Non-verbal cues complement verbal messages by adding emphasis and clarity, which enhances the communication's effectiveness. For example, a speaker might use gestures to highlight key points, or adjust vocal tone to convey sincerity. When verbal messages are paired with facial expressions or body language that supports the spoken word, the overall message becomes more emphatic and impactful .
Nelsen observes that men are generally inferior to women in decoding and encoding non-verbal cues. This disparity may be attributable to social conditioning, where women are encouraged to be more expressive and emotionally aware, aiding their proficiency in interpreting such cues. Consequently, women may exhibit greater sensitivity and affection, affecting interpersonal communication patterns .
The key differences lie in the directionality and complexity of communication processes. The linear model views communication as a one-way process with no feedback, exemplified by the Aristotle and Shannon-Weaver models. The interactive model introduces a feedback loop, allowing messages to be sent back and forth between sender and receiver, as seen in Schramm's and Dance's models. The transactional model takes this further by allowing simultaneous sending and receiving of messages with both parties acting as sender and receiver at the same time, enhancing interaction .
The Ecological Model of communication, unlike previous models, presents a non-linear, complex interactive system where elements such as the creator, message, and consumer can influence each other reciprocally. It emphasizes the dynamic and multifaceted interactions in communication, reflecting modern communication practices better than its linear and interactive predecessors .
Verbal communication operates as a system of symbols that are arbitrary, ambiguous, and abstract. This means words do not have inherent meanings but are interpreted based on context and rules. Its rule-governed nature impacts its use, as phonology, semantics, syntax, and pragmatics dictate sound patterns, meaning, grammatical structure, and contextual understanding, respectively. Together, these aspects facilitate complex idea expression and reality definition .