Reflection 1
A CRITICAL REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO OF EVIDENCE, DEMONSTRATING
SYNTHESIS AT THE THEORY-PRACTICE INTERFACE
By [Name]
Course
Professor’s name
Institution
Location of Institution
Date
Reflection 2
Introduction
Having a role as a general surgical nurse, there are various roles that I am involved in
thus ensuring that quality care is adhered to. In a brief summary, as a general surgical nurse,
my key roles are related to provision of care to a surgical patient before, during, and after a
surgical procedure. Prior to any surgical procedures, my main roles revolve around the
patient, being involved in meeting with patients and their families in explaining to them the
procedures and the expectations including risks attached and the recovery time and further
their role in ensuring the safety of the patient. Among other crucial considerations involve
cleaning the cite of incision and further stitching the wound after the surgical procedure.
Monitoring and evaluating the patient after the procedure is also a crucial role involved thus a
need of professionalism and efficacy in ensuring that quality care is adhered to. Among the
key experiences as a general surgical nurse are associated to issues and challenges that I
experience on a daily basis some attached to the pressure involved in the provision of care to
these patients. Time and patience is a crucial aspect in this profession and given the relevance
of quality, it is considered crucial to acknowledge some of the challenges experienced. One
of the key issues is based on errors where considering the complexity of presurgical aspects
such as documentation, I value the relevance of checklists and consistency in communication
before the surgical procedures. Additionally, teamwork is also an aspect that has an impact
where working under minimum supervision, I consider it relevant to be maximally
responsible in ensuring that everything is crosschecked thus minimising errors. The essay
focuses on addressing some of the key challenges and issues experienced and further
documented by researchers in relation to general surgical nurses. Additionally, the essay
focuses on addressing the significance of checklists specifically focusing on the WHO
surgical safety checklist and its efficacy in minimizing issues such as deaths and errors in
surgical patients.
Reflection 3
Roles, Challenges, And How to Effectively Care for Surgical Patients
From a personal experience, nurses have a significant role in promoting the health of
patients. Research has also been played a considerable role in understanding the role that
nurses have in ensuring that surgical patients experience a satisfactory care. This can be noted
from a study by Nestler (2016), where the author stated that based on the importance of
nurses in providing care for surgical patients, it should be noted that they always
continuously work in very close contact with patients thus fostering the realization of
activities of daily living as well as ensuring quality medical treatment. This means a high
educational level and high commitment to these patients. Among the key considerations that
Nestler (2016) and further noted from a study by Aglio et al. (2022) noted is that through
primary contact with surgical patients, nurses always assess the competencies in the daily
living and activities of the patient before and after surgery, participating in the evaluation of
needs for assistance to the patient. This ensures a smoother transition of the patient to normal
daily lifestyle. Another considerable role that has efficacy and necessitated by research is
based on communication.
One of the key roles that has always been necessitated along my practice focuses on
constant and consistent communication that is timely to relevant practitioners in care
provision to surgical patients. A study by Flynn et al. (2022) commented on this stating that
in care coordination to surgical patients, nurses are always the first to communicate with the
physician and other occupational groups in the planning for treatment process for surgical
patients. Udelsman et al. (2019) further in their study of clinician-to-clinician communication
on patient goals related to surgical patient outlined that during care planning, nurses have a
relevance in coordinating key communications between these coordinating groups in enabling
a smooth care provision to the patient. As per the authors, in addressing barriers including
record inaccessibility, lack of protocols, and difficulties attached to the documentation of
Reflection 4
complex conversations, nurses are always the most influential coordinators ensuring that each
barrier is addressed sufficiently. This leads to the acknowledgement of the role of nurses in
providing clear and understandable communication and records to physicians and other
occupational groups as in poor coordinated care, then failure in coordinating the care is
always blamed to the nurse given inefficiency in practice. Another considerable role is
associated with patient education.
Researchers such as Kang et al. (2020) and Kang et al. (2018) in their studies
necessitated the role of a nurse in ensuring that patients gain sufficient knowledge on self-
care and self-management of patients after a surgery in a bid to ensure sufficient knowledge
in transitioning from dependency of care to self-dependence in management of surgical
wounds. This is a procedure that based on personal experience, it was always necessary to
ensure that a patient has a smooth and effective care transition from depending on basic care
provided by a nurse to self and family-based care provision. As per Kang et al. (2018), in
postoperative general surgery patients, this is a period where postoperative complications
occur mainly during the first 30 days after an operation. The authors in combination to
findings from a study by Kang et al. (2020, p.1698) stated that nurses have an advanced role
with Kang et al. (2020, p.1698) stating that nurses have four key roles in this process
including “assuming responsibility for patient education in the absence of discharge
communication; supporting patients to participate in self-management after hospitalization;
variability in the resources, content and delivery of discharge education.” As such, it is
crucial for nurses to consider these key concepts among other relevant aspects in the delivery
of patients thus ensuring a smooth transition.
Despite the significances of nurses in surgical care, it is also prudent to consider that
given that there is not always an effective care considering patient differences and
environmental effects in maintaining an effective care to these patients. Resaei et al. (2018)
Reflection 5
acknowledged that it is also always challenging for nurses in providing sufficient care to
surgical patients which in most cases leads to gaps in the care produced. Rezaei et al. (2018)
noted that the most considerable gaps include quality evaluation, medication management,
surgery assistance, and other major operations attached to this process. A study by Neville
and Roan (2014) noted that one of the key challenges is also always attached to caring for
surgical patients with substance abuse dependence. In a personal experience, most of surgical
patients especially those with long-term use of drugs and struggle with addition issues. This
has been confirmed by various researchers including: Hasak et al. (2018) a study on
empowering post-surgical patients to improve the disposal of opioids in post-surgery; Straw
et al. (2020) noting the implications to patients fighting drug addiction and the effects of
clinical infection diseases attached to post-surgery; and Eamer et al. (2018) in their study
focusing on morbidity and mortality attached to elderly surgical patients, drug abuse being
among them; among other studies noting the impacts of this issue not only on health
outcomes but also the provision of care. Focusing on the autonomy of a patient, it is always
challenging to address this issue in surgical patients who are drug addicts. In their study,
Naville and Roan (2014) stated that nurses in such circumstances need additional educational
and professional support in care provision to these patients.
Lastly, based on the acknowledgement of these key crucial issues associated to
nursing care for surgical patients, there are further additional professional needs that need to
be addresses. As noted in the previous analysis based on the key roles in my experience and
further supported by different researchers, nurses not only experience challenges but they
have an important role in ensuring that surgical patients experience sufficient care that is
attached to their care needs and further must always act professionally. We as nurses have an
extensive role in not only bridging care provided to a surgical patient through sufficient
succinct and dependable and timely communication but also ensure that patients have a
Reflection 6
smooth time transitioning from care provided to self-management. It is also relevant for us to
consider the impacts we have as nurses in ensuring that surgical patients adhere to care and
have a normal lifestyle in post-surgical life compared to their previous lifestyle with
consideration of professional needs as can be noted from the next sections.
WHO Surgical Safety Checklist
From the previous analysis, it was noted that among the main roles that nurses have is
bridging effective communication in managing surgery patients through effective practices
attached to not only handover but also coordination of care of these patients thus
communicating sufficiently with the physician and other occupational groups. This is an issue
that has always been of concern and also noted to have significant implication in patient
safety care provision. As of a study by Haugen et al. (2019), the WHO safety checklist is
among the tools that was developed through the consideration of complications that are
attached to surgical procedures mainly pore-surgical procedures hence eliminating issues that
might put the safety of the patient at a risk.
On the relevance of the WHO checklist, in a study by Jain et al. (2016) on answering
the main question on why we need the WHO safety checklist stated that majority of adverse
events, the authors approximating it to approximately 43%, happen in the operating theatre.
Additionally, in a study by Shankar (2018), an approximate of 234 million people undergo
major surgery and of these population, more than one million of these patients die due to
complications that Jian et al. (2016) noted are avoidable. Regardless, of the issues attached to
surgical procedures, it is relevant to note that surgical safety as acknowledged by Jian et al.
(2016) has not yet been recognized as a health problem due to resources especially in middle-
and low-income countries. As such, authors such as Hadia et al. (2021) among other authors
necessitated the relevance of implementing and utilising the WHO surgical safety checklist in
routing practice thus ensuring the adherence to various issues including teams adhering to
Reflection 7
critical safety steps, consistency in ensuring patient safety steps, and the maintenance of a
culture of teamwork and safety.
As noted in the previous section and further in the introductory phase of this section,
communication is among the most considerate aspect that is focused on with nurses ensuring
that they play a central role in ensuring no mishaps encountered along the communication
and implementation of the care plan for these patients. As per a study by Bukoh and Siah
(2020), among the key challenges encountered that is affiliated to communication and patient
safety is attached to handover with the authors noting that the key challenges attached to this
issues include information inaccuracy, omission of information, and documentation errors.
This in most instances is attached to the previously outlined challenges experienced by
surgical patients in surgical wards thus leading to deaths that were preventable. As such,
through the consideration of the WHO checklist, it is possible for nurses to ensure an
effective communication. As per a study by Walker et al. (2012), the relevance of the WHO
surgical safety checklist is unmatched with nurses being recommended to consider it
significance in addressing issues attached to the safety of the patient thus utilized in the
reduction of errors involved in documentation among others.
Generally, the WHO safety checklist has been considered the most effective in
addressing some of the key challenges that are experienced by not only nurses but also
physicians and other healthcare professionals involved in the coordination of care and
surgical procedures thus promoting an effective coordinated care with sufficient and
dependable communication. This in turn promotes the quality of care experienced by a
surgical patient.
Efficacy Of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist
Based on the effectiveness of the WHO surgical checklist, as previously noted and
outlined, it is relevant for healthcare practitioners, precisely focusing on nurses given that the
Reflection 8
first source of error is always associated with this phase of care to consider the relevance of
the implementation and utilization of the surgical safety checklist.
From a study by Jian et al. (2018), since the WHO safety checklist was incepted in
healthcare in 2008, there have been various studies pilot studies globally, the authors
accounting these studies to 8 stating that there have been various steps noted since the
checklist was implemented in the hospitals. As per Jian et al. (2018), the rate of site
infections due to surgical procedures significantly decreased to 3.4 percent from 6.2 percent
which accounts for a decrease of up to half. Additionally, as per the authors, based on death
rates which was among the key focus when implementing the checklist, there was a notable
decrease to 0.8 percent of deaths from the previous 1.5 percent. This means a significant step
has been improved in the background thus promoting the efficacy of healthcare practitioners.
Focusing on the efficacy of the WHO surgical safety checklist, it is also relevant to
focus on the applicability and ease in addressing some of the key challenges that are attached
to surgical procedures from pre-surgery to post-surgery. From a study by Cabral et al. (2016),
the authors noted that since the implementation of the WHO safety checklist back in 2008,
different practitioners involved in a survey noted that there are various milestones noted in
their interaction and utilization of the checklist. As per the author, based on the usability of
the checklist, 79 percent of the staff noted that the checklist was easier to use. Additionally, it
is also relevant to focus on the aspect attached to the improvision of care and the perception
of care providers. White et al. (2020) commented in this aspect noting that an approximate of
79 percent of staff considered its relevant in the simplification of tasks thus enabling
improvised care. To these participants, since the implementation and trial of the surgical
safety checklist, they noted an improvement in care. Another most crucially is addressing the
challenge attached to communication. As per a study by Cullati et al. (2013) as per then, the
surgical safety checklist was considered to be more effective when utilized rather than when
Reflection 9
not used. As per Jian et al. (2018) the efficacy attached to the utilization of the WHO safety
checklist in addressing the challenge of communication was approximated to be 84 percent.
Lastly, based on errors, Jian et al. (2018) also noted that 78 percent thought the checklist to
be an effective aspect in error reduction. This proves the efficacy of the checklist in
addressing the most significant issues that are attached to surgical procedures.
Regardless, in the implementation, for accuracy purposes, it is also relevant to address
some of the key challenges that are attached to the implementation of the surgical safety
checklist. From a study by Haugen et al. (2019), some of the barriers that are attached to the
WHO’s surgical safety checklist as outlined by the authors include inefficacy of the checklist
in increasing operation time, first starts on time, or same day cancellations. Additionally,
Verwey and Gopalan (2018) further noted the key barriers are related to time issues and lack
of buy-in from team members. Their study mainly centered at confirming the barriers given
that there were no new barriers that were experienced along their study. Regardless, all these
authors commented on the relevance of the WHO surgical safety checklist. As per the
authors, the checklist was much more relevant in the current healthcare setting given its
implication in addressing key issues attached to mortality rates and strategic directions in
error reduction. All the authors confirmed its relevance in the implementation of the checklist
thus recommended for nurses to always consider its efficacy and utilize it maximumly and
sufficiently when dealing with surgical patients. Regardless of the comments and further
clarifications, it has also been noted as per a study by Haugen et al. (2019) that the checklist
has not always been implemented effectively with the author recommending for a more
advanced mechanism to be used in the implementation thus enabling sufficient utilization.
How to avoid errors
As per a study by Rodziewics et al. (2022), the authors stated that the best way in
making sure that errors are reduced in surgery is pausing before the surgery and double
Reflection 10
checking. As previously outlined and further acknowledged by the author, among the key
errors that are experienced in surgery among other healthcare practices in the hospital, mainly
related to nurses include errors of omission which are mainly resulted by actions not being
taken; and errors of commission which are errors done when a practitioner is involved in
taking a wrong action. Regardless, there are various strategies that have been considered
effective in such instances especially in surgical procedures that have always been associated
to complications.
As stated before, during surgery, there are various aspects that may lead to errors that
may not be effective in addressing the safety of the patient. As such, Rodziewics et al. (2022)
in their study first focused on the aspect of croisscheckin and ensuring that every aspect if
correct. As per the authors, preventing a mistake in surgery is mainly associated with the
prevention of doing the wrong surgery on the wrong patient and in some instances at the
wrong body part.
Another significant implication that has been severally documented has been attached
to the issue of communication. It can be noted even on the previous paragraph that through
the errors associated with communication, the wrong patient might receive the wrong surgical
procedure. As such, Fudickar et al. (2012) in their study focusing on the relevance of the
WHO surgical safety checklist commented on the issue of communication. The authoers
noted that it is relevant or practitioners to always consider the implications of ineffective
communication. As per Fudickar et al. (2012) it is always relevant to consider that the
checklist is done sufficiently. Additionally, the authors commented on the relevance of
briefing. To the authors, this is a team meeting where information needed for the joint
performance of task is exchanged and checked. Through briefing, nurses among other
specialists involved in the teamwork will have sufficient knowledge on what proceeds thus
minimizing errors that might have occurred.
Reflection 11
Generally, considering some of the outlined safety measures that might be considered
in the minimization of errors, it is also crucial to utilize the WHO surgical safety checklist in
surgical procedures given that it minimizes the chances of encountering any errors along the
procedure. This should be followed by cross checking that each aspect has been addressed
before any briefing. As such, errors will be significantly reduced hence ensuring that quality
has been adhered to.
Conclusion
Generally, the research mainly focused on a reflection on surgical practices with a
target in addressing the role that nurses have in relation to surgical patients and examine the
contemporary issues and challenges associated with surgical care. From the analysis, based
on the roles and challenges that nurses experience in provision of care to surgical patients, it
was noted that among the key roles nurses are involved in are attached to their first
interaction with the patient. It was outlined that nurses in surgical care have a role to
communicate sufficiently to the physician and other practitioners involved in teamwork in
ensuring the patient receives quality care. From the analysis, it was also noted that during the
care for surgical patients, there are various issues and challenges that nurses among other
practitioners’ experience. The first and most crucial aspect is related to communication. Due
to the implications of communication, there are various issues that may be experienced
including surgery being performed on the wrong patient or on the wrong body part. This has
more damages to the quality of care provided to the patient. Another significant issues that is
also associated to communication is the aspect of errors that are associated to communication.
Among the most common errors outlined include errors of omission, inaccuracy of
information, and errors associated to documentation. This is an error that occurs at the first
site in care provision before handout thus necessitating the relevance of nurses in ensuring
effective practices along their documentation and record keeping. among other errors are
Reflection 12
based on the surgical procedures. Due to such issues, the WHO developed the surgical safety
checklist that focused on addressing the key issues involved in the documentation and
procedures along the surgery. From the research conducted, it was noted that the surgical
checklist, having been implemented in 2008, has been more effective in addressing key issues
such as deaths associated with surgery that have been noted to have been more before the
implementation. Additionally, the checklist has been proven to be more effective in error
reduction thus minimizing the percentage of errors involved in surgical procedures. Most
healthcare practitioners and nurses have implemented and commented on the relevance of the
implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist thus enabling them minimize errors
along their practices. It was also relevant to consider the analysis on hoe to minimize errors
along the care provision to surgical patients. Among the key aspects considered was an
effective communication that focused on documentation which it was recommended for
nurses and practitioners to always consider cross checking and double checking that every
aspect was addressed. Additionally, in significantly minimizing errors, it was recommended
for healthcare practitioners to always consider the relevance of briefing as this not only
minimizes errors but also promotes the effectiveness so team work involved in the surgical
procedure.
Reflection 13
References
Aglio, L.S., Mezzalira, E., Mendez-Pino, L., Corey, S.M., Fields, K.G., Abbakar, R., Baez,
L.A., Kelly-Aglio, N.J., Vetter, T., Jamison, R.N. and Edwards, R.R., 2022. Surgical
Prehabilitation: Strategies and Psychological Intervention to Reduce Postoperative
Pain and Opioid Use. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 134(5), pp.1106-1111.
Bukoh, M.X. and Siah, C.J.R., 2020. A systematic review on the structured handover
interventions between nurses in improving patient safety outcomes. Journal of
nursing management, 28(3), pp.744-755.
Cabral, R.A., Eggenberger, T., Keller, K., Gallison, B.S. and Newman, D., 2016. Use of a
surgical safety checklist to improve team communication. AORN journal, 104(3),
pp.206-216.
Cullati, S., Le Du, S., Raë, A.C., Micallef, M., Khabiri, E., Ourahmoune, A., Boireaux, A.,
Licker, M. and Chopard, P., 2013. Is the Surgical Safety Checklist successfully
conducted? An observational study of social interactions in the operating rooms of a
tertiary hospital. BMJ quality & safety, 22(8), pp.639-646.
Eamer, G., Al-Amoodi, M.J., Holroyd-Leduc, J., Rolfson, D.B., Warkentin, L.M. and
Khadaroo, R.G., 2018. Review of risk assessment tools to predict morbidity and
mortality in elderly surgical patients. The American Journal of Surgery, 216(3),
pp.585-594.
Flynn, D.E., Flynn, H., Gifford, S. and Smith, K., 2022. Can you hear me? Analysis of a
Queensland patient‐initiated escalation process and the importance of communication
in surgical care. ANZ Journal of Surgery.
Fudickar, A., Hörle, K., Wiltfang, J. and Bein, B., 2012. The effect of the WHO Surgical
Safety Checklist on complication rate and communication. Deutsches Ärzteblatt
International, 109(42), p.695.
Reflection 14
Hadia, R., Joseph, J.J., Mathew, J., Patel, S., Rathod, T., Joshi, D., Shah, B., Baile, S., Gohel,
K., Kardani, S. and Maheshwari, R., 2021. Implementation of WHO Surgical Safety
Checklist and Pre-operative Anxiety Levels to Study the Effect on Post-operative
Recovery among Surgery Patients.
Hasak, J.M., Bettlach, C.L.R., Santosa, K.B., Larson, E.L., Stroud, J. and Mackinnon, S.E.,
2018. Empowering post-surgical patients to improve opioid disposal: a before and
after quality improvement study. Journal of the American College of
Surgeons, 226(3), pp.235-240.
Haugen, A.S., Sevdalis, N. and Søfteland, E., 2019. Impact of the world health organization
surgical safety checklist on patient safety. Anesthesiology, 131(2), pp.420-425.
Jain, D., Sharma, R. and Reddy, S., 2018. WHO safe surgery checklist: Barriers to universal
acceptance. Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology, 34(1), p.7.
Kang, E., Gillespie, B.M., Tobiano, G. and Chaboyer, W., 2018. Discharge education
delivered to general surgical patients in their management of recovery post discharge:
a systematic mixed studies review. International journal of nursing studies, 87, pp.1-
13.
Kang, E., Tobiano, G.A., Chaboyer, W. and Gillespie, B.M., 2020. Nurses' role in delivering
discharge education to general surgical patients: a qualitative study. Journal of
advanced nursing, 76(7), pp.1698-1707.
Nestler, N., 2019. Nursing care and outcome in surgical patients–why do we have to
care?. Innovative surgical sciences, 4(4), pp.139-143.
Neville, K. and Roan, N., 2014. Challenges in nursing practice. The journal of nursing
administration, 44(6), pp.339-346.
Rezaei, T., Ghahramanian, A., Abdullahzaed, F., Sheikhalipour, Z., Asghari-Jafarabadi, M.
and Fadaei, Z., 2018. Service quality gaps in the provision of care to surgical patients:
Reflection 15
a cross-sectional study in the northwest of Iran. Journal of Caring Sciences, 7(3),
p.157.
Rodziewicz, T.L., Houseman, B. and Hipskind, J.E., 2022. Medical error reduction and
prevention. StatPearls [Internet].
Shankar, R., 2018. Implementation of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist at a teaching
hospital in India and evaluation of the effects on perioperative complications. The
International journal of health planning and management, 33(4), pp.836-846.
Straw, S., Baig, M.W., Gillott, R., Wu, J., Witte, K.K., O’regan, D.J. and Sandoe, J.A., 2020.
Long-term outcomes are poor in intravenous drug users following infective
endocarditis, even after surgery. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 71(3), pp.564-571.
Udelsman, B.V., Lee, K.C., Traeger, L.N., Lillemoe, K.D., Chang, D.C. and Cooper, Z.,
2019. Clinician-to-clinician communication of patient goals of care within a surgical
intensive care unit. Journal of Surgical Research, 240, pp.80-88.
Verwey, S. and Gopalan, P.D., 2018. An investigation of barriers to the use of the World
Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist in theatres. South African Medical
Journal, 108(4), pp.336-341.
Walker, I.A., Reshamwalla, S. and Wilson, I.H., 2012. Surgical safety checklists: do they
improve outcomes?. British journal of anaesthesia, 109(1), pp.47-54.
White, M.C., Daya, L., Karel, F.K.B., White, G., Abid, S., Fitzgerald, A., Mballa, G.A.E.,
Sevdalis, N. and Leather, A.J., 2020. Using the knowledge to action framework to
describe a nationwide implementation of the WHO surgical safety checklist in
Cameroon. Anesthesia and analgesia, 130(5), p.1425.