Scribd
Upload
5 views2 pages

Critical Reflection

This document outlines the requirements for two critical reflection papers due in a Celtic Christianity course. Each paper should be 4-5 pages responding to a provided topic by providing a critical synthesis of course materials and the author's own insights, grounded in evidence and explanation. Papers will be graded on structure, style, use of course materials, and substance.

Uploaded by

Ezra Benson
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
5 views2 pages

Critical Reflection

This document outlines the requirements for two critical reflection papers due in a Celtic Christianity course. Each paper should be 4-5 pages responding to a provided topic by providing a critical synthesis of course materials and the author's own insights, grounded in evidence and explanation. Papers will be graded on structure, style, use of course materials, and substance.

Uploaded by

Ezra Benson
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

THEO 228 Celtic Christianity ©

Critical Reflection Paper (30%)

There will be a total of two (2) Critical Reflection Papers due in this course. These
papers will consist of a critical response to your choice of one of two topics provided.
Each paper should be 4-5 pages long and is worth 15%

An excellent Reflection Paper responds to the assigned question(s) by providing a


critical synthesis of relevant course material along with the authors’ own insights.
Insights should be grounded in data and carefully explained so that your reader can
follow logic and see how you arrived at your conclusions.
200-1200 words, standard formatting (1-inch margins, 11-point font.)

Papers will be graded according to the following criteria:


Structure (3 marks)
• Intro outlining focus/thesis and main points
• Coherent development of points
• Conclusion
• Good sentence structure and paragraphing
Style (2 marks)
• Sound grammar
• Spelling
• Standard formatting
• Standard citation as per your program Major (be consistent!)
Course Materials (3 marks)
• Appropriate use of a range of materials
• Proper citation of direct quotes and paraphrasing
• Direct quotes not overused or overlong, and not stand alone (i.e. quotes should be
used to support author’s points, not make them without author’s explanation)
•
Substance (7 marks)
• Author responds to assigned question(s) and maintains this focus
• Author has clearly presented main and supporting points, and provided
evidence/examples as appropriate, and makes the argument for them

© May not be copied or duplicated


without the permission of the owner. 1
• Degree of intelligence, depth, creativity and sophistication in using course materials
and author's own critical insights
• The "weight" of the paper lies her

© May not be copied or duplicated


without the permission of the owner. 2

You might also like