Administering Jerry Johns Reading Inventory
The inventory uses different forms for assessing each comprehension mode. For oral reading, the student reads aloud, and the teacher assesses miscues and comprehension. Silent reading uses Form D, where the comprehension score follows similar procedures as oral assessment. Listening comprehension involves the teacher reading aloud while the student follows the text, and comprehension is scored like oral comprehension .
To score oral reading fluency, you mark where the student is after one minute to calculate words correct per minute (wcpm). Miscues are noted as substitutions, omissions, insertions, reversals, and repetitions. The accuracy rate is calculated by subtracting miscues from the total words read, then dividing by the total words read. If the reading is less than a minute, wcpm is calculated by dividing the number of words read correctly by the seconds taken and multiplying by 60 .
Graded word lists start with lists easier than the student's known level and progress to more challenging ones. Students read at their own pace, and correct words are marked with a '+'. Misread words are noted, with self-corrections indicated differently. After initial reading, students attempt misread words again. Scoring considers correct words for sight and analysis to identify independent, instructional, and frustration levels .
Start one level below the independent level and introduce passages per instructions. A timer is set for one minute to determine the rate of fluency. The student continues reading after the timer. Scoring of miscues and fluency calculations consider miscues in the first minute, while wcpm is adjusted if the passage is finished in less than a minute. Timing constraints ensure consistent fluency assessment .
Miscues such as substitutions, omissions, insertions, reversals, and repetitions decrease reading accuracy. They are subtracted from the total words read to determine the number of words read accurately. This calculation is necessary for finding the accuracy rate, which is essential for evaluating comprehension levels .
Allowing look-backs can indicate difficulty in retaining content, as five or more look-backs may suggest memory issues. Look-backs can help assess instructional level, particularly for grades 9-12. Correct answers from look-backs are given half credit. If too many look-backs are needed, it may indicate that the material is too challenging for the student .
Forms LL and LI offer a deeper appraisal of a student's reading ability, focusing on literary/narrative and informational/expository materials. They can be read both orally and silently, providing flexibility in assessment. Their significance lies in assessing a broader range of reading skills and genres, helping identify specific strengths and weaknesses in different reading contexts .
Retelling supplements comprehension questions by requiring the student to recall and articulate passage content without looking back. It emphasizes understanding and memory retention, allowing the teacher to gauge if the student can summarize and relay main points independently. This evaluation is recorded and can highlight comprehension gaps not evident in direct questioning .
Writing prompts are used informally to assess writing fluency, spelling, use of conventions, and relevance to a given topic. Although aligned with reading passages, they aren't a measure of comprehension. Students write responses separately, which are then evaluated using a rubric focused on organization and adherence to the prompt, not comprehension performance .
The reading levels are determined based on both word recognition and comprehension scores. The Independent Level requires word recognition at 99% or above and comprehension at 90% or above. The Instructional Level requires word recognition at 95% or above and comprehension between 75%-85%. The Frustration Level is indicated by word recognition below 90% and comprehension below 50% .



