Oranges & Sardines, Issue 2, Fall 2008
Oranges & Sardines, Issue 2, Fall 2008
FALL 2008
Edited by
David Krump
Andy Nicholson
Meghan Punschke
Didi Menendez
ORANGES&SARDINES
RANGES
&
S RDINES
CONTENTS
ON THE COVER:
Natalia Fabia by
Didi Menendez,
oil on canvas
24” x 20”
Publisher / E.I.C.
&
DIDI MENENDEZ
Creative Director
I. M. BESS
Emily
Bob Kendal
Hicok Frey
12 68
William Cathryn
Stobb Cofell
26 104
Jane Patrick
Draycott Duggan
44 133
Brooklyn
Copeland
63
Artists
Natalia Peter
Fabia Ciccariello
7 74
Zhaoming Jorge-
Wu Alberto
22 100
Robert C. Justin
Jackson Wiest
34 106
Victoria Dana
McKenzie Clancy
50 114
Glenn David
Harrington MacDowell
64 118
Paul Nahem
Béliveau Shoa
70 128
[Link]
7 ORANGES & SARDINES
Natalia Fabia
[Link]
Natalia Fabia
9 ORANGES & SARDINES
Natalia Fabia
10 ORANGES & SARDINES
Wonderful Wild Beast oil, collage and gillter on canvas 72” x 72”
Natalia Fabia
11 ORANGES & SARDINES
Natalia Fabia
12 ORANGES & SARDINES
Bob Hicok
Bob Hicok
15 ORANGES & SARDINES
Bob Hicok
17 ORANGES & SARDINES
Bob Hicok
19 ORANGES & SARDINES
Bob Hicok
21 ORANGES & SARDINES
Zhaoming Wu
[Link]
received his BFA from the European Artists in 18 & 19 century, such as Auguste Rodin,
Guangzhou Academy of Rembrandt.
Fine Art, China and his MFA
from the Academy of Art How do you choose your subject matter?
University, San Francisco. I get ideas for my paintings in one of two ways. Sometimes
I get an idea, so I will tell the model roughly what it is and
His work have featured in: let her interpret it. Other times, I will ask the model to just
International Artist start moving around. When I see something I really like, I’ ll
Art Talk ask her to stop and hold the pose. Either way, I know I ‘m
America Art Collector found a subject when all of variables combine to elicit an
emotional response in me.
Art of West
Zhaoming Wu
26 ORANGES & SARDINES
William Stobb
William Stobb
30 ORANGES & SARDINES
Some Overflow
This thinking overflows the poem. About how musical it was—
the zig-zag the bird made in its deft fly-away-and-then-back
and its clear, momentary pose all made me think of how like
instruments we are played by perception and consciousness. I
turned the bike and trailer around, rode back and found the
bird again. It had an ample source of food in seeds fallen on
the trail—we’re right in the middle of a late spring bloom—so I
was sure I’d find it again and I did. And when I managed to
get close enough to see it clearly a second time, I thought and
felt that the bird was only itself now. In that first moment when
its performance blew through me it had been more. Not, “it
had signified more,” though I know it’s absurd to argue that I
didn’t interpret it. It was more than itself. It was bright
arpeggios separated by an eighth note rest. It was you, Earl.
But in the second instance, it was itself only. “Of course it has its
own life,” I thought. These thoughts about how the dead are
with us—the mechanism of it, in a way, though that sounds
awful. Maybe the instrumentation of it—the ways we’re blown
through the larger harmonic. Maybe the dead play the
symphony of the living, though after I wrote “At the Afterlife
Hotel” I started really hating metaphors about what the dead
are doing. I wanted to think of the dead very physically. And
then blue appears in nature. Physical blue. Even a blue flower
but in this case better, an animate creature, softly textured and
coming still as if to present itself as blue, seems so precious as to
have been dropped from some richer sphere. This thinking
overflows as maybe living overflows.
Robert C. Jackson
[Link]
Robert C. Jackson is a
Q&A
Which artists do you admire or have had the biggest
influence on your work?
contemporary realist still Historically, Rembrandt. But in all honesty, I’m affected
life artist. Since 1997 he has most by the people I know. That would include a
been working full time at boatload of peers but at the top of my list would be
his painting craft. painter Scott Fraser . He has been invaluable in the
exchange of ideas, discussion of painting, and someone
to simply challenge me to go farther.
Robert’s work is in private,
corporate, and museum How do you choose your subject matter?
collections and shows in A hoppy ale or imperial stout and a little time. I’ll take a
various galleries from coast break from my painting occasionally to sit in a local
to coast. hangout for an hour and just brainstorm. In those times I
just write ideas as my work is driven by the narrative. Not
His work can be seen at: that I always have a long story to go specifically with a
piece, but I certainly give the viewer a jumping off point. I
Arden Gallery, Boston MA have a few sketch books that during those hours I intently
write down as many ideas as possible.
Gallery 1261, Denver CO
Leslie Levy Gallery, What was the first piece of art you were paid for?
Scottsdale AZ I’ve never liked selling my work personally so I am thrilled to
work with galleries. Thus my first sold piece was a simple still
Zenith Gallery, life painting that sold through my first gallery.
Washington DC
Do you have a ritual or specific process you follow when
creating art?
I work. I’m a pretty disciplined person so I go to work and
paint. I’ve had some folks ask if an artist should wait until
they are “inspired.” I wake up very seldom feeling
“inspired” and if I waited for it to come, it would never
show up. But, If I start painting, before long, I am lost and
captivated by what I am doing.
Robert C. Jackson
37 ORANGES & SARDINES
GC: What is the urgency might exist. Growing up When, at the age of 16,
of poetry in your own in a home that held only the same age my boys
life? Readers Digest are today, I happened
condensed novels was across William Carlos
RS: When I was younger, not conducive to finding Williams’ The Desert
say the age of ten, I out. Fortunately, the Music in the local library,
knew that I wanted an suburb I grew up in was I knew I had found what
art of language, but I on the edge of Berkeley, I’d been looking for.
didn’t really have an so that what I couldn’t
idea what that might find at home I could
mean, what possibilities come across in the world. GC: What was the most
39 ORANGES & SARDINES
critical crossroad in your how to sort the mail and crime, tho he was
professional life? told me to open up the removed from the
next day so that they work-release program. It
RS: There are so many could come in around gave my new employer
different ways to answer ten, a sense that I could
that. When I left UC but when I arrived I think and act in an
Berkeley during my senior discovered an emergency, and I was
year to perform my “escaped” convict from given much more
“military obligation” as a San Quentin literally responsibility right away
conscientious objector hiding in the shadows. than otherwise might
with a prison movement He’d been part of a have been the case.
group, the Committee for work-release program
Prisoner Humanity & but had failed to return
Justice, I GC: How do
discovered that poems without
nonprofit narrative and
groups needed “Narrative, in a strict story create
writers, even if experience?
they didn’t sense, is nothing other
know it RS: The same
themselves. way
Before I left that
than the unfolding of experience
job – I stayed does. Narrative,
five years – I meaning in time . . .” in a strict sense,
and a half- is nothing other
dozen other than the
people had unfolding of
crafted a rewrite of to the joint the night meaning in time, and my
California’s state penal before because a work is deeply narrative.
code, setting terms for female co-worker, not But it doesn’t confuse
over 3,000 different knowing he was a narrative with plot, which
felonies. Perhaps the San Quentin inmate, is something altogether
most critical crossroad on offered him dinner and different. I have a hard
that job occurred my some post-dinner time imagining what my
very second day there. companionship. I had to work must look like to
The two women who ran negotiate his surrender somebody not familiar
the organization had and managed to do so with it, if only because
given me the keys to the in a way that he was not I’ve been on the inside
door and instructions on charged with any new now for decades,
Jane Draycott
[Link]
Jane Draycott
46 ORANGES & SARDINES
Turquoise
Because it is so necessary.
In the shop they are looking
for bits of sky. It is in his eyes.
She is in his eyes, sacred object,
talisman against some kind
of falling. Her eyes are turquoise,
tending towards fire. Like heaven.
Inlaid like heaven on earth.
Jane Draycott
Jane Draycott
48 ORANGES & SARDINES
Despite the rather large (these days) size, this collection is dense with excellent
and varied work, an unusual intensity, and many surprises. The image, language,
and sound are usually very sharp and well-worked, and there is an attitude that
wavers from playful to a bit sinister. You really need check out some samples:
Page18:
...I want to stay here to see
who owns this car Almost a blue-quiet in red
neon But the wind polishes its ice pick
to push be to the far edge of my daily
walk past the crack motel and morphine Bright
Aid Drug Store...
There is almost an addled talking through teeth to the sound, and the objects
are all sharp and dangerous, and the sprinkling of the mundane among the
pretty and lethal.
Page 27:
...To get a green passport Be &
Be a soul Stand back please Give
The alphabet time to breathe the dirt
Beneath the deaf squirrel who jumped
& flew 100 yards when the oak
Fell Be soul & tell us why you
Hate God A sentence squirting ...
alternate phrase plays, a disquiet....wow. This is the sort of thing that stops me in
my tracks at the book store, all the deciphering to do, all that play, hints at things
beyond the poem.
There are many macabre moments, some personal, but with the poetic edge
undulled:
Page 41:
He tried to leave
Through hidden wisdom teeth
Then through two front teeth
With their pain-filled silver helmets
All along, there are little patterns, about ten pages of recollections, tributes to
other poets, more witty or macabre observation, some youth scenes. Through it
all, there is a strange precision yet a paired detachment from reality that makes
this always surprising, and sharp. I will be revisiting this, for sure. It’s a pretty
amazing body of work.
Victoria McKenzie
[Link]
[Link]
Victoria McKenzie is a
Q&A
Which artists do you admire or have had the biggest
influence on your work?
graduate of Brown Egon Schiele, Pierre Bonnard, Romare Bearden, Joan
University. She moved Mitchell, Alice Neal
to NYC in the late
How do you choose your subject matter?
1980s; attended
I’m drawn to melancholy faces or scenes – capturing an
Parsons School of expression that says much more than that which is instantly
Design and studied obvious. Depth of soul.
privately with artist
Beverly Brodsky for What is your opinion of digital art v. traditional art?
several years. She is As someone who pays the bills through the practice of
digital technology and design, I can find myself straddling
married and the both sides of this issue. Putting a computer into the hands
mother of two of someone who knows which buttons to push doesn’t
daughters. She can be mean they will create a work of art. I’d put it this way,
found online at someone with the knowledge and experience of working
[Link], with traditional materials can create amazing things on a
computer, once they learn the software but I think the
which has links to her
reverse journey is MUCH more difficult. Similarly, working
full archive of work and with traditional materials, without the benefit of hitting
also her daily art blog, “undo,” forces you to really master your skills and ultimately
The Night Shift. gives you much more confidence.
What was the first piece of art you were paid for?
I think it was a small watercolor of some colorful sarongs
blowing in the breeze, strung on a line between two palm
trees. Sweet and simple.
Victoria Mckenzie
53 ORANGES & SARDINES
Victoria Mckenzie
The woman on the far left standing with her hands in front of her waist is Kirk Curnutt’s great-grandmother.
She is 115 and currently the oldest person in the world. The boy in the right in the overalls is his grandfather.
55 ORANGES & SARDINES
would’ve still been teaching, too, if But that was to the future. For
not for the Snodgrass girl and all the now he was content to rattle along
talk she’d started about him. That Blue Ridge Road, passing the time
was why Ortis happily considered daydreaming about his customers.
himself a company man: Mr. DePrez He wondered what Hester Cherry
hadn’t paid a whit of attention to would be like had her boy, Howard,
those rumors. He just plain hired Ortis, not died in the Argonne (Ortis
talkers be damned. Maybe driving an regretted not getting over); whether
ice truck wasn’t a path to a quick the cripple bachelor Dar Fately
fortune, but it beat hiring out as a would’ve had better luck with
farmhand or working at the furniture women if his legs hadn’t been eaten
factories that were then Shelbyville’s off by a thresher; whether poor
major employers. If Ortis played his families like the Pruitts would replace
cards right, he figured he could get their horses with motor cars had they
off the road by graduating up to a dollop of prosperity.
mechanic, maybe even managing Only one family Ortis didn’t
the garage at some point. And, as it care to conjecture about. He’d
turned out, that’s exactly what heard tales aplenty about the widow
happened: within a decade, Mr. Brandywine, and they were too
DePrez would promote him to reminiscent of what the Snodgrass girl
supervisor of the fleet, and from there had said to cost him his teaching job.
Ortis would go on to become an So as he knocked on the mudroom
engineer and then plant manager. door Ortis made sure he had nothing
Even after the ice industry went extraordinary in his expression, lest the
under and necessity transformed the woman think he was gossiping to
company into a water distillery himself about her. Only it wasn’t the
(among other things), Ortis C. Huber widow who answered — it was the
stayed with the DePrez family. He man. The one, rumor had it, Mrs.
would still be receiving a paycheck Brandywine refused to marry.
from them when he died in 1982. By The one, rumor made sure to
that point, he would be ninety-one, add, whom marriage was the only
and the scurrilous things the thing she refused him.
Snodgrass girl said about him were “Jus’ checking to see if the
long forgotten, even by Ortis himself. icebox needs tending,” Ortis said in
“I wish Mr. Ford would make a turned his truck around and crawled
machine what grows its own tires.” slowly up to the widow’s drive, close
Ortis bounced the nail in his palm. enough to see the black script
“Now that would be some kind of painted above the rear tire of the
efficiency.” chrome-colored chariot. GENERAL
He set the nail on his dash as ELECTRIC, it said. REFRIGERATOR. And
he started the truck and rattled back above the word, in the open flatbed,
toward the road. As he passed the as if there to rebuke the doubters, sat
barn he spotted a second silhouette a fancy white box. It, too, had a
on the roof — the widow’s boy, Ortis crown: an odd, glassy contraption
figured. He gave the pair a farewell shaped like a pillbox hat.
honk of his horn. He knew the boy Ortis watched the driver
well enough: on hot days, Clinton unload the appliance, the widow’s
was one of the children who hopped man telling him how to do his job the
on Ortis’s running boards begging for entire time. When there was nothing
shavings. left to see Ortis again turned back
*** toward Shelbyville. He was passing
He’d finished the day’s the cornfield that marked the edge
deliveries and was already past the of the widow’s farm when a boy
widow’s farm returning to Shelbyville hopped the drainage ditch and ran
when a truck came barreling down toward him. Normally Ortis would
Blue Ridge Road at him. It was neither merely slow and tell Clinton how
as wide nor as tall as Ortis’s truck, but dangerous it was to jump on a
it was spiffier and acted like it owned moving running board, but today he
the ground it traveled — even the stopped his truck.
plume of dust it churned up looked “I thought you were roofing.”
regal. Ortis had to veer toward the “Ma saw the scarecrow was
drainage ditch to avoid getting down.”
clipped. Even then the woosh when it He pointed toward the ditch,
roared past sent a shiver through his where a cross of wood was wrapped
axle that vibrated all the way up with a plaid shirt and topped by a
through the steering wheel into his crocker sack, both stuffed with hay.
hands. Ortis cursed the other driver The face on the sack gave Ortis a
until a thought entered his mind. He giggle.
“I bet you painted that smile “All you’ve got to do is slip this
yourself, huh? It’s the same red as under that G. E. fellow’s tire, without
what your ma’s barn is.” him or Horace seeing.”
“Ma said a smile scares the The boy seemed to study the
crows more than a scowl. She sent nail. Then his eyes flicked up toward
me to prop ’im back up. Horace Ortis, and just as suddenly back to
planted him but didn’t tamp the post the sharp tip.
in deep enough. Crows keep “I know what you’re thinking.
knocking him over.” You’re wondering what Horace is
“Knockin’ which over? — gonna care if a delivery man gets a
Horace or the scarecrow?” flat. The refrigerator’s already in the
Ortis didn’t wait for Clinton to house, idd’n it? Well, you’re just
laugh. He didn’t figure the boy gonna have to trust me. Something in
would. me thinks that G. E. fellow is every bit
“‘Horace,’ huh? I guess I never a smart-mouth as your —”
thought to ask his name. What do He almost said stepfather.
you think of that fellow?” “The son of a gun darn near
The boy didn’t answer. blew me off the road,” Ortis told the
Probably out of respect for his mother. boy instead. “That’s the funny thing
“Well, I hope I don’t offend about the future. It’s always in a hurry
you when I say I don’t much care for to run down the present.”
him,” Ortis went on. “Strikes me as a Clinton still hadn’t budged.
smart-mouth. Thing is, since he’s “All right then. I’ll make it really
buying you and your ma that fancy worth your while. I’ve got some extra
monitor-top, I won’t have to put up blocks back there. What say we crush
with it. You’re still gonna have to, one up and you can have a cup of
though. I don’t envy you that. I feel shavings? Gotta be hot on that roof.
so bad for you I’ve got an idea. It Shavings for the rest of the week
may not take the smart-mouth out of could keep a boy like you mighty
old Horace, but it could give us both cool. Tomorrow I’ll even bring a bottle
a leg up on him.” of flavoring for you. You can hide it
He swiped the nail off the out here in the field and Horace’ll
dashboard and held it toward never have to know.”
Clinton. Ortis had just about given up
you’re running over out here in the that Horace — who was snapping a
boondocks.” switch-stick into the corn with a
*** sloppy, unfocused violence that said
Ortis only wondered how he probably wouldn’t have been any
much efficiency that new refrigerator use laying shingle. What he was
brought the widow Brandywine’s whipping couldn’t be seen; it was
farm for about a week. He made sure obscured by the chest-high stalks.
the boy got his daily cup of shavings, Ortis had a pretty good idea, though,
but other than presenting Clinton his and it chilled him with fear and guilt.
promised bottles of strawberry and The nail was his idea, after all—he’d
peppermint, he never again pushed the mischief on the boy. Ortis
mentioned the nail. Mr. DePrez didn’t jerked his gearshift into neutral and
seem too worried about competing jumped the drainage ditch, yelling,
against monitor-tops, either. Ortis was “Let him alone! Let him alone,
there when his boss crossed the dammit!” as the dangling thicket of
Brandywines off the company ledger unshucked ears thumped his chest.
with a light stroke of his pencil. “The Only it wasn’t Clinton on the
thing about those installment plans,” receiving end of that disciplining. It
Mr. DePrez told his favorite driver. was the widow’s scarecrow. The
“You miss a single payment, and the switch-stick had popped the buttons
store comes calling for its machine. A off the tattered shirt that held its
big company like G. E. won’t float a stuffing, so hay spilled everywhere like
customer through hard times. My dry innards. “I’m in charge here!”
guess? The widow’s man will be back Horace screamed. He was so caught
with his tail between his legs. up in proving it that he didn’t even
Probably stuck there by the widow notice he wasn’t alone anymore. “I
herself.” run this farm! You hear me? I do!”
That day had yet to come The object of his beating
when Ortis next saw him. He was was so compliant in taking the
working his usual route on Blue Ridge punishment that its expression didn’t
Road when he spotted an odd sway change a lick. The smile Clinton had
in Mrs. Brandywine’s cornfield. He painted on the crocker sack just kept
slowed enough to see it wasn’t due on grinning, red hot as a taunt.
to a breeze or a loose cow. The sway Even the widow’s scarecrow
was caused by the widow’s man — couldn’t help but laugh at her man.
Brooklyn Copeland
[Link].
Glenn Harrington
[Link]
internationally and have been John Sargent; for his design, mastery of light and color,
featured in such publications as draftsmanship, and facile execution - making look simple
American Arts Quarterly, American what is very complex.
Art Collector, International Artists
Magazine, the covers of American How do you choose your subject matter?
Artist & US Art, New Art International,
Observation is crucial in selecting imagery. Usually, It’s
The New York Times, and
Philadelphia Inquirer. He has had derived from nature or natural human emotion. Sometimes
numerous solo exhibitions in New the imagery selects itself and I have only to notice it. When
York, Japan, Charleston, South designing a painting, it tends to be a matter of experimenting
Carolina and Pennsylvania, and has with a subject, remaining flexible, editing possibilities until
exhibited at the Norman Rockwell something interesting appears.
Museum, The Museum of American
Illustration, the Medici Gallery in What is your opinion of digital art v. traditional art?
London, and the USGA Museum.
I’m open to anything lasting being produced in the digital
His portrait work is highly regarded, medium. There are painting principles that transfer to an
having received the Draper Grand electronic approach, but I feel they are inherently quite
Prize in 2007, the Honor Award in 2008 different. There’s something raw, unplanned and
and 2005, and Certificate Award in independent, about picking up a brush or pencil in an
2004 from the Portrait Society of attempt to say something about an experience. All the senses
America’s international juried show. are at work. I love the feel and smell of it; colors have distinct
Harrington’s portrait of Maria Callas scents, brushes wear down and become familiar, the feel of
was used to promote the Tony Award the canvas varies. Each stroke is a track, a thought, it’s 3d
winning play “Master Class.”
Glenn is represented in Manhattan by
and exposes the planning and skill in the artist’s intent. I’m
the Eleanor Ettinger Gallery. amazed at what’s being produced digitally, but feel at
present, a certain homogenization that is limiting.
Glenn Harrington
67 O R A N G E S & S A R D I N E S
Glenn Harrington
68 ORANGES & SARDINES
THERE
A crow is eating
the matador’s
shadow.
69 ORANGES & SARDINES
MATADOR
Beauty that is not shaped is heart-buckled
Beauty lives across the divide from the other-shaped beauty
I have lived on the other side of beauty
I have lived this side of beauty
Beauty the scale we measure loss against
Beauty the fence
Beauty the fence we climb
Beauty the hole we step through
Make a hole-shaped place for beauty
Each hour a sacrifice to beauty
Beauty sacrifices itself
Paul Béliveau
[Link]
University in 1977. Recognized for his I could say Rubens for his genius as an artist, unifier,
expertise in drawing, engraving and cultured man, diplomat, businessman who has been able
painting he has since then had more to gather assistants and collaborators who have
than sixty solo exhibitions across “nourished” his genius. Throughout my career (30 years
Canada and the United States. His now) I have been influenced with some very talented
works can be found in many public artists who have had completely different career paths,
and private collections throughout such as the inevitable Picasso who went though the 20th
the country and has to his name Century like a comet, burning almost everything on his
some fifteen works of art integrated way. Pop Art has a large influence on my work as well, with
into architectural sites. The recipient Warhol who understood American people with their
of numerous prizes in visual arts and qualities and failings. I am an ardent admire of Bahaus
of multiple grants from the Canada style with Gropius and Rohe, those who have literally
Council, Béliveau has taken part in transformed teaching and design during the 20th Century.
several committees and juries as
specialist in the visual arts. Paul How do you choose your subject matter?
Béliveau lives and works in Quebec The series “Les humanites” originates in my search for
City, Canada. giving the book a different look than the one we are used
to, that is put down a table (close or open) with very
Currently represented by the traditional scenes. Opting for a “close-up” of the book
following fine galleries : spines, vertically or horizontally arranged, has allowed me
Galerie de Bellefeuille, Montreal to count more on the formal and semantic issue on the
Stricoff Fine Art, Ltd, New York painting. Each work holds a different subject according to
the books used and this way I sort of create a utopic
Plus One Gallery, London, UK library.
Arden Gallery, Boston
Winsor Gallery, Vancouver Do you have a ritual or specific process you follow when
Robert Kidd Gallery, Detroit creating art?
Although my painting is figurative, I love doing things on
the spur of the moment. My ritual lies more on the fact that
I come to the studio every morning at 7:15 Monday-Friday
and during summer I take my bike to ride to the studio, it
prepares my mind and body to a very productive day.
I would say I am very “well-disciplined”.
Paul Béliveau
73 ORANGES & SARDINES
Paul Béliveau
74 ORANGES & SARDINES
Peter Ciccariello
[Link]
Peter Ciccariello is an
interdisciplinary artist, poet, and influence on your work?
Q&A
Which artists do you admire or have had the biggest
photographer, whose work
experiments with the fusing of Albert Pinkham Ryder & Marcel Duchamp.
language and visual imagery. He
has studied art and design at How do you choose your subject matter?
Pratt Institute, Brooklyn, NY,
Rhode Island School of Design, It chooses me, it finds me.
Providence, RI, and Parsons
School of Design, NY. What is your opinion of digital art v. traditional art?
RECENT SELECTED GALLERY Digital art is tomorrow’s traditional art. A computer is a tool
SHOWS and a tool is nothing but a tool.
AND EXHIBITIONS:
PETER CICCARIELLO: Recent Work What was the first piece of art you were paid for?
Uncommon Vision at the Gallery An abstract painting done with paint rollers.
Above, Providence, RI
- June 19 – July 15 2008
Speech Acts: Art Responding to Do you have a ritual or specific process you follow when
Language, Rhetoric, & Politics creating art?
Harvard University, I surrender then take no prisoners.
Dudley House, Lehman Hall,
Cambridge, MA - 2008
Conceptual Poetry and its Others What is your secret weapon?
- 2008 Exhibition of Visual Poetry, Unmitigated temerity and the empirical knowledge that
The University of Arizona Poetry
Center absolutely nothing is real.
Souped-up Pontiac - Group
exhibition at the Museum of New
Art in Pontiac, Michigan - 2008
First Prize winner of the Donnie
2007 Contest, MOCA Museum of
Computer Art – February 2006
First Prize Co-winner of the MOCA
Museum of Computer Art -
October 2006
First Prize Winner of the Corel
Manipulated Photography
Competition, July 2006 and 2007
ViSual POetry* Exhibition
Harvard University,
Dudley House, Lehman Hall,
Cambridge, MA - 2006
75 ORANGES & SARDINES
Glyph Poem 11 fine art limited edition pigment print 18” x 24”
Peter Ciccariello
76 ORANGES & SARDINES
Glyph Poem 1 fine art limited edition pigment print 18” x 24”
Peter Ciccariello
77 ORANGES & SARDINES
Glyph Poem 8 fine art limited edition pigment print 18” x 24”
Peter Ciccariello
78 ORANGES & SARDINES
There is no cliché in the present moment. The way that a hummingbird flits
about the feeder, were I only to observe it as sharply as it is, cannot be a cliché
because this is the first time I have seen this and the first time I have said it to
myself in my mind. A cliché is a image fixed to the point of banality. The present
moment is not fixed. Within the images of the present moment, the cycling of
possession and dispossession, presence and absence, displays and effaces itself,
as can be readily made apparent if I were to ask you to describe to me what the
fuzzy oval of a hummingbird’s wings looks like, or, the turning colors of its narrow
pointed body – colors like those of a pigeon’s neck or carnival glass, acidic and
sweet pinks and greens of a Christmas ornament. The possession and
dispossession cycles so fast in the thresh of a hummingbird’s wings that its
presence is infused by absence, just a blur. In the words of Bob Hicok:
The hummingbird
no living person’s seen,
blue unless red until green.
Iridescent, watery
prismatics:
think abalone,
the wildly rainbowed
mirror of a soap-bubble sphere,
think sun on gasoline.
The hummingbird
no living person’s seen,
blue unless red until green.
The pleasure of these three lines has something to do with the faintly archaic
rhyme, which has an effect of slightly increasing the accent on the word “seen,”
along with the use of the comma and line break to isolate that word; this is an
organic reflection in form of the point being made in content that the colors of
the hummingbird are constantly changing and so to describe them as blue or
red or green is imperfect and even to add temporal modifiers such as “unless”
and “until” does not wholly correct the imperfection.
Thus an imperfection of observation or of description is incorporated into the
presentation – which is a good thing, since it’s true to reality.
Birds in poems are often used as images at the verge of a void. Just like a bird
in flight is literally the only thing you may see against the void of the sky behind it,
in poems we often find a bird deployed as a sort of last or liminal image along
the margin of a void. For example from Wallace Stevens:
A gold-feathered bird
Sings in the palm, without human meaning,
Without human feeling, a foreign song.
The birds occupy a liminal space before a void. They are final findings or
possessions of the eye before that transcendent or nihilistic dispossession (nothing
to see) of the void. They are beautiful in themselves, and their beauty is as if
heightened by the imminent negation of the void which follows them. The birds
are paradoxical – “ambiguous” – symbols of the imminent dispossession of sight,
loss of images. The void as dispossession of sight is fearful because as Nietzsche
said, when you look into the void it looks back into you. I.e., in looking at the bird
before the void, you are starting to look into the void as well, in a figure/ground
sense, and you are in danger of falling into that void, there is nothing for your
eyes to grab hold of and stand on, and the void without the image becomes a
forceful dispossession because it is hard to see how poetry can exist without the
image.
And so arguably in this sense the lyric poet must endure or tolerate an
unpoetic, apoetic, de-poeticized area (the void), in order to access the image
(the bird).
Chinua Achebe has written that “the psychology of the dispossessed can be
truly frightening.” To view the liminal image at the edge of the void is truly a
fearful situation because the closer the image, or the word itself, gets to the
edge, the more absolute and reversible it gets – the closer it comes to total
dispossession. There is the ambiguous nature of Stevens’ birds. Likewise
ambiguous are Rilke’s guardians of the void, his angels. Are Rilke’s legendary
angels positive or negative figures, in a passage like the following?
In this sense the simple study of poetry can be dangerous, not in a physical
way like the handling of guns, but in a psychological way because knowledge
itself is experience, and to put thought into words is to experience thought, and
there are many thoughts which are painful and dangerous especially at these
limits, where figure-ground relations become asymptotic and gorgeously
agonized, the figure crystallizing and encrusted with iridescence and diadem in
correlation to the ever-greater emptiness of the void. The image coruscates with
its imminent dispersion.
This sort of in extremis imagism or seeing of the thing may however simply be
the natural way of seeing things, for the lyric poet – the naked lunch, if you will,
the way the meat on the end of the fork really looks. It is the ubiquity of its
unbearability which leads to potential strain on the lyric poet’s psychology and
to the pathos of the lyric. T.S. Eliot said that we can’t bear very much reality, and
there is a continuity to how he accepted the conservative religious structures of
the Anglican Church even as he endured the radical nihilism glimpsed in “The
Waste Land.” It is necessary to resort to some formal protection against the
desert of the real. Thus Stevens’ fire-fangled bird at the periphery, or just this side
of the void, or, likewise, the golden mechanical bird which ends Yeats’ poem
“Sailing to Byzantium,” similarly encrusted and diademed, but now just that side
of the void, over in the safety of the artifice of eternity:
Like these poets, Hicok has his own survival strategy which negotiates and
manages the void. For one thing, he is an unusually sociable poet. He has done
poetry slams, traveled around on the road with other poets, he teaches poetry
classes, etc. So often it is the presence of one or more other people and the sort
of sociable lightness or humor that accompanies that, which keeps things from
getting dark. Consider the following extract:
The person
who drove me home
said my smile was a smeared
totem that followed
his body that night as it arced
over a cliff in a dream.
(from “What Would Freud Say?”). You can see a preserving humanism and
society: the other person, the companionship of the two, even as one goes into
a dream.
Another example from later in the same poem:
To be loved
by Blondie, Dagwood
gets nothing right
except the hallucinogenic
architecture of sandwiches.
Humor and American pop culture as saving graces. Again, the poem has
other people in it – something that’s often missing from lyric with its tendency to
self-obsession. Another example:
word eat more along the lines of the way that Weil used it.
The final image in the poem I quoted an extract from above was as follows:
The poems have fragments which are becoming subject to a unifying activity
which is nothing other than the lyricism of the pursuit. As an example:
(from “O Canada”).
His method here is cognizant of the fragment as a dominant aesthetic mode
over the last 100 years, but the feel of the poem is of fragments moving toward
unity as opposed to moving toward greater disjunction; you could call him an
optimist in this sense. The individual images, motifs, or quasi-fragments, can be
somber, in the way that Chopin can be somber, but the relationship between
each image or motif generally has a feeling of a unifying activity at work and
there is a certain pleasure to the text in that respect. Both Stevens and Barthes
said text must give pleasure and with Hicok I think it is done in part through using
narrative and story modes in his poems, which act as connective tissue. The lyric
moment is diffused through the temporality of narrative. Whereas Ashbery like
Stevens is more strictly lyric and constitutionally incapable of plot, character or
dialogue (try reading Stevens’ play in Opus Posthumous if you don’t believe me),
Hicok is generous with story effects. For example the following has a sociable
aspect that indicates how he includes narrative, dramatic, or short-story
techniques in his poems as opposed to staying on an obsessively lyric axis:
(Hicok, “Bottom of the Ocean”). You can see the conversational tone at work
there and the use of storytelling strategies and willingness to put other people in
the poem, to get away from the self. As another example, in the below passage
from another poem we see a strategy of dialogue which like something
you would find in a story, although it is tweaked tonally, line by line, in a way
which is lyric:
—Slices of cloud.
(from “Meadowlands I”). In these and other passages in Gluck’s book we hear
echoes of dialogue of two spouses reflecting an exhausted marriage. The
technique is all the more interesting since Gluck is typically very lyric and
dialogue which is narrative or dramatic in nature is typically absent in pure lyric.
But to note these story aspects in Hicok’s work is not to deny the passages of
pure lyric, for example these three examples:
The repetition of butterflies in the first bit and sky in the second indicates the
potentially tautological aspect of lyric. An image still more liminal than a bird on
the sky is the sky on the sky but that is when the image disappears. A tautology is
a statement of the form, A = A, and but for the possibility of a poetic statement,
it may be the most accurate thing that can be said about a thing. It has no
doubt. But it is empty. It is true only at the expense of meaning nothing, as
Wittgenstein would say. Hicok uses movement to prevent the tautology from
affixing itself too severely. In his images above there are gestures of movement:
the butterflies leave, someone tries to hang a painting. These gestures of
movement are critical to prevent the fixity of tautology which when it occurs in
poems resembles a desiccated emptiness, a gray taste like the gray that occurs
when mirrors reflect mirrors. We seek emotional identity, emotional truth, and
emotional truth and color that is not strictly logical – cannot be strict tautology.
Yet from a logical point of view, it is difficult to see how any statement of the
form, A = B, can be as true as the statement, A = A, since in the example of A =
B, there is a differentiation or a variance between A and B which is in conflict
with strict identity. But equality need not be identity, and that is the emotional
truth we seek in poetry: a way of seeing us as the other, or to use the phrase of
Rimbaud, “I is an other,” equality of being which is not identity – allowing the
other to be other (not I) yet equal.
Hicok’s poems are interested in emotional truth as being something received,
and in some fashion to be kept separate from the essentially rational and logical
care which is the mere craftsmanship of poetry. His poems represent a delicate
ongoing negotiation between craft, which is at its worst a denial of the wildness
of talent, and talent which need not be negated by craft insofar as talent may
not be anything the self can construct or control but rather something that
speaks into the poet from elsewhere, something the poet simply receives and
cannot take credit for. This was Czeslaw Milosz’ poetics and he was a poet with
great talent and great craft. Milosz said his poems were not something he could
take credit for because he was taking dictation from what he called a
“daimon,” which other poets might call, the muse, or, inspiration (to be breathed
into, as if physically receiving a voice from the other). Like Milosz or Yehuda
Amichai, I think that Hicok wants to receive (and not take credit for) an
emotional truth, which is not controllable by the ego, which comes from a
wilderness separate from deliberate craft, and which can only by corralled,
To survive we have to eat. Life is based on exploitation and killing. I am not sure
that there is any way around this. Eating demands a context which is safe and
non-terrifying, but that context is fake. One’s possession is another’s
dispossession. The psychology of the dispossessed can be fearful. And so to me
there is a purity to be found in a poet inhabiting profound dispossession, for
example Jean Genet, who was not only poor, gay, but in jail as well, during
World War II (a sort of dispossessed trifecta). Or Holderlin, Nietzsche, Artaud, the
sanctity of insanity as a refuge. Or Hart Crane, Kerouac, Verlaine, Cocteau,
Baudelaire, the sanctity of the extreme. Poetically speaking, those may be easier
places for authenticity, than, say, if you were in an administrative committee
meeting at an English Department somewhere. I can demonstrate this
bypointing you to the horrible politicking that goes on among the poets in those
departments, the corruptive pressure of poetry being tied to preferment and
career; this often leads to a stylistic entropy in writing. Look at the blurbs poets
write for the backs of each other’s books; the awfulness of book prizes, of
selecting and editing as political acts when the forces that drive the process
include the economic aspirations of those involved. In the end they force the
poet’s mind to spend large amounts of time dedicated to and thinking in a
corrupted and banal prose discourse which can’t help but infect his poetry. The
gap between what he really is thinking about (promotion, position, self-doubt,
self-image, banal chores of the day) and what he is writing about becomes too
great: a sucking entropic effect emerges out of the disparity between the life he
lives and the one he would write about. What an icky situation to be in. I think
that is why writers such as William Stafford so persistently tell us to look at the small
things, the little details, the daily moments, as sustenance and for poetry,
because at least there, the life we lead and the life we write overlap.
With Hicok, there is a sense of the moment as something in motion. Look
again at these two images:
Rain crossed
my neighbor’s field at the speed of a million mouths
per second kissing corn.
*
I hear fields
coming closer, wind walking fingertip by fingertip
across the wheat
Chinua Achebe also said that although fiction is fictitious, it can still be true or
false. There is a sense of that in these images: of an emotional veracity in the
images, though they are overtly fictive in the sense that rain does not have
mouths nor breezes fingers. Both of the images give a fleeting sense of something
too large to be sensed. We can barely handle sometimes what our one mouth
feels; how much less could we possibly handle what a million mouths feel. In the
same manner, when it rains it is impossible to hear or count every separate
raindrop. By using the figure of a separate mouth for each raindrop, we feel a
momentary expansion of the senses or a momentary sense of seeing more than
we can really see. So we have felt otherness just for a second. The same thing
happens in the second image, where now the stalks of the wheat or the invisible
fronds of the wind are described as fingertips. The figure is similar in both
passages: the mouths in the first, the fingertips in the second, each as a way of
allowing a fleeting experience of multiplicity, of the numerous nature of the
drops of rain or the ears of corn, the bits of wind or the stalks of wheat. The use of
gestural motion by Hicok connotes multiplicity. Personification of a nature image
is a traditional motif; but the deployment of it across multiplicity is specifically
contemporary and brings to mind meditations on similar themes by Jorie
Graham and Mark Doty:
obstacles—
and the surface rippling under the wind’s attention—
rippling over the accumulations, the slowed-down drifting
permanences
of the cold
bed.
I say iridescent and I look down.
The leaves very still as they are carried.
to be yourself only,
unduplicatable, doomed
to be lost? They’d prefer,
(Doty, from “A Display of Mackerel”). I think the use of the word “iridesce” by
both Doty and Graham is indicative of their wish to catch something as it passes
and attach words to transience. Iridescence is a moving glimmering. The
iridescence of a school of fish is like that of the moving surface of a river.
Attachment of the lyric to themes of multiplicity is not only a way to stretch lyric
beyond the single moment into a temporal series, but also, a way of focusing the
lyric on something besides the romantic or confessional “I.” Doty, Graham, and
Hicok all avoid the devastated “I” figure we see in Robert Lowell, John Berryman
or Sylvia Plath. The key may be the selflessness of multiplicity, which however
introduces a new set of questions. Consider how Doty finishes his poem, which is
a meditation upon the sight of a bunch of mackerel fish laid out on ice at the fish
market:
Although the end is ambiguous in its illumination of the absence of self which
occurs with the presence of the selfless, I would not characterize its tone as
ferociously negative in the manner of Lowell’s confessionalism. Lowell’s
observation, his image, is always overlaid or intermixed with the ongoing drama
of his self, its suffering and exhilaration and conflagration. To continue with our
aquatic theme, compare the above example from Doty with this from earlier
Lowell which indicates what I mean:
(from “The Quaker Graveyard at Nantucket”). The poor fish here is individualized,
single, is somewhat abused by the pummeling of the words “heel-headed” and
“barks,” and then is immediately tied into a tormented human ego-figure, Ahab.
Another example from Lowell:
(from “For the Union Dead”). In this case too, the separate image of the fish is
only there for a little while on its own before it is overlaid with or mixed with
something bluntly human, individual and mortal that takes us back to the
concerns of the “I,” of the speaking and dying self stated in lyric terms. Doty is
less like Lowell than like a hybridized postmodern self which is somewhat lighter
and gestures toward the suppression of the explicitly confessing self in favor of
the freedom of observation of multiplicity. Both Doty and Hicok are closer to
Elizabeth Bishop than to Lowell. Consider Bishop’s fish poem:
(from “The Fish,” Elizabeth Bishop). The tone of the “I” here is intangibly lighter
than that found in Lowell, perhaps because of a humility which prevents the “I”
from the presumptuousness of explicit suffering, or because the observation of
the image is allowed to portray the image rather than the self. The things in
Bishop’s poem feel more as if observed on the spot; those in Lowell feel more as
if recalled from memory. Doty with his lightness of tone is closer to Bishop than to
Lowell, however he is much more explicit with the use of the subjective “I” than
Bishop; in this respect, he like so many others has been influenced by Rilke. Now if
I compare all of the above to a Hicok poem (with a fish in it to boot) we can see
how his tone at its best has an otherworldly optimistic lightness, and he writes in a
measured moderate fashion which may be a survival strategy for avoiding the
conflagration of the “I,” of the romantic and confessional self:
(“Alzheimer’s”). Somehow this avoids bathos. The ending of that poem is pitch-
perfect, and I think you can see how addressing a subject that could easily take
the poem into entirely negative territory, the tone is somehow in a subtle way
optimistic. In part this is achieved through the use of metaphors which are in
themselves, all else being equal, positive: “child,” “a bird so rare,” and the fish
described in a manner that brings to mind those strange illuminated transparent
deep sea fish found in the pages of National Geographic.
The Alzheimer’s poem tells us how to possess anything in this world is, at
another juncture, to be dispossessed of it. Everything must die, all things must
pass. Further, to possess anything is to be dispossessed of that other possession, or
that absence, which preceded it. For we cannot possess an infinite number of
things and we cannot hold an infinite number of things in our attention. To turn
attention toward one thing is to turn it away from another, and as one thing
possesses the attention, another thing is dispossessed by it. There are things that
we possess that we swear we will never lose, we can never lose. Those things
leave trails in our memory once they go away. How we handle, or better, how
we are handled, by that state, is the beginning of elegy.
Jorge-Alberto
[Link]
Jorge-Alberto
102 ORANGES & SARDINES
Jorge-Alberto
103 ORANGES & SARDINES
Jorge-Alberto
104 ORANGES & SARDINES
Cathryn Cofell
[Link]/cathryncofell
High-Speed Connections
I took a digital picture of my hand
and sent it away,
emailed to a psychic in West Bend.
At first, it was undeliverable.
Then a suspicious attachment, needs
authentication.
A third time she replied,
said my palm was fuzzy.
I became her $20 Pay Pal
and suddenly she had clarity,
a map quest, a maze of intersections.
She saw a scoundrel’s name,
Lucy or Cin,
a flamboyant but unremarkable life.
Wrong, I said, that was not my life-
line she was reading,
it must have been a silver hair
caught on the lens as the shutter closed.
But she held firm,
said it was more than just the palm
she read, she knew me, she saw
how my lines crossed with others,
a flash of pain in every touch.
She saw a future as a circus act
or a hit man and I knew she had me,
caught in her sites, that day
I let you fall from my slick palms,
that endless Hitchcock drop,
hands forever clutching,
cliffs of straw and chaff.
Cathryn Cofell
106 ORANGES & SARDINES
Justin Wiest
[Link]
Justin Wiest
108 ORANGES & SARDINES
Justin Wiest
110 ORANGES & SARDINES
& AGrace
Snap-Shot Narrative Of A Snap-Shot Life:
Cavalieri’s Anna Nicole: Poems
REVIEW BY JEREMY HUGHES
body and mind sensing maternity She also says that poets, like children,
strongly and biologically when she feel the world in a particular way but
holds the maid’s child, “she loved that she does not “know the name
how it felt/with the baby” (‘Unlikely for poetry” (‘A Tiny Boat Caught
Relationships’), and when she hears Sideways’). Within the context of the
the cook’s baby cry “all the book this awareness of poetry and
honeybees/gathered at her heart” poets jars a little with a persona
(‘Bitter to Better’). In hospital Anna whose response to the world around
meets a woman who has had three her is more usually physical. It could
children by three different men, “a be the ignorant idea of what poets
good idea,/Anna was jealous”. It is are or poetry is i.e. people who
sadly humorous, showing us a woman respond in a ‘special’ way, a way
whose moral compass is faulty and unknown to her. In a life bereft of
leads her in directions rather different poetry, Cavalieri bestows poetry
to generally held acceptability. For consciously to beautify an otherwise
Anna to be a mother would, in some meretricious life (rather than a
respects, be a baby looking after a meretricious person). Firstly there are
baby and, in any case, it might seem the quotations of others, as when
obscene: holding the maid’s baby the “True Love” quotes Celan,
against her chest feels “like a new Shakespeare and Rilke, and secondly
rug on a dirty floor” (‘Unlikely her own memorable lines such as
Relationships’), the child merely “the flat wet hand of grief/against
perpetuating Anna’s gross way of life. the hot cement of her heart” (‘And
It is a life upon which Cavalieri Even More Than That’). Cavalieri
imposes the sensibilities a poet may asserts that poetry is found even in
be assumed to exhibit, explicitly in superficial lives lived in a superficial
Anna’s own thoughts explaining that manner. It would be too easy to
she does not know how to show her suggest that the Anna who lives in
grief: these poems is just a dull blonde
she wouldn’t since she is as complex as the next
know to hang it out on a person, in whom the spiritual and
tree and watch it, as poets did. secular co-exist uneasily, struggling
to understand the world without
and within.
Dana Clancy
[Link]
University’s School of Visual Arts, My time in the studio is neccessarily solitary, but I tend to like to
College of Fine Arts. She surround myself with a crowd when it comes to influences.
received an M.F.A. in Painting Painting is less lonely when I’m in conversation with images and
memories of paintings that have transported me, changed me,
from Boston University and a B.A. and challenged me. Combinations occur that help me through
from Vassar College. Ms. my work. Ellsworth Kelly’s cool shapes + Edouard Manet’s cool
Clancy has had solo exhibitions subjects. That Piero della Francesca’s tightly organized paintings
at the Danforth Museum of Art, evoke more than they answer + Philip Guston’s brave, honest and
and the Sherman Gallery at immediate responses to Piero and to himself. The private and
Boston University and has public moments unfolding within the stunning geometry of space
exhibited her work in group in paintings by Hishikawa Moronobu.
exhibitions, including shows at
Delta Axis at Marshall Arts, How do you choose your subject matter?
Memphis, Bowery Gallery, New Most of my subject matter in the past ten years has to do with
York and Gallery 100, Saratoga calling the viewer’s attention to the act of looking, though on the
Springs, NY. Her work has also surface the work has ranged widely from paintings based on
been shown in New England at webcam images, to self portraits (some with binoculars), to the
Green Street Gallery, the Boston current paintings of viewers in museums. I work in series toward
Center for the Arts’ Mills Gallery, completing a body of work. When I am in the midst of this series
FPAC Gallery, the South Shore there is a flow - while painting one piece another comes to mind,
Art Center, and ArtSPACE@16, though the finished painting may be very different than what I
and is in the permanent initially imagined. The choice of subject matter that I’ll work with
for a couple of years usually happens when I am just working in
collection at the DeCordova my studio trying out ideas or when I travel to a new place with
Museum and Sculpture Park. both distance from the studio and a sense of attentiveness to
She is currently working on a what is new. The series of binocular paintings came about
solo installation of portraits in because I had a pair of toy binoculars and I was looking through
conjunction with the Brattleboro them and saw myself in the mirror. The series of museum paintings
Museum’s portraiture show, came out of a trip to the Tate Modern where I was struck by the
scheduled for December, 2008. experience of seeing so many levels of space at the same time,
and by the geometry of the space, and the way the figures in this
space reminded me of what I love about Ukiyo-e imagery.
115 ORANGES & SARDINES
Dana Clancy
116 ORANGES & SARDINES
Dana Clancy
118 ORANGES & SARDINES
David MacDowell
[Link]
He Paints 9-11 hrs a day, is What was the first piece of art you were paid for?
I won $50 in a Fire Prevention Poster contest when I was 9.
open for commissions.
I remember spending it all on games, Snoopy models and
Flintstones figurines to paint!
David MacDowell
121 ORANGES & SARDINES
David MacDowell
122 ORANGES & SARDINES
GC: Death is the DL: Ah, well. To have as both, four years
esthetic in your new three of five members apart, were
poetry (see the July/ of my immediate unexpected and swift
August 2008 issue of family die (father, and due to the
The American Poetry mother, sister) in a unremarkable, if
Review). Would you four-year period was hidden, failings of the
speak of the life - and self - body.
paradoxes, in that altering. The deaths
family deaths of my mother and I think, more than the
brought you the sister were actual absence of
richest gifts? particularly shocking, their physical selves,
123 ORANGES & SARDINES
it has been the total asked to endure, your first book, In the
dissolution of the for a while, loss after Surgical Theatre?
family construct, the loss; they have made
swift destruction of me a wiser, more DL: An interesting
assumptions about relaxed, more question. My current
stability, longevity, grounded person – work certainly seems
family and home, if with a certain a lot more interested
that has jarred and unshakeable . . . in a whole sentence,
moved me. I now sobriety of spirit. a whole line, not
really get A tempered heavily enjambed, if
imper manence – personality. And a enjambed at all,
and have realized, lot more periods in even to the point of
and was startled by the poems! developing some
realizing, that most prose poems, a for m
of us don’t. We I suppose the I’ve never much
can understand it paradox of art from worked with. When I
intellectually – but death is the paradox track line length from
to feel it, know it, of life from death. Surgical through
I think is nearly But that’s a lesson Wedding Day and
inconceivable we’re being asked to into the new work,
without undergoing a lear n all the time: the line does seem to
trauma of physical spring from winter, get longer and
loss: through and all that. We longer – not always,
devastating fire, deem it ‘paradox’ but more often than
catastrophic illness, because we in the past. My
plane crashes, freak generally have such intuitive hit on your
accidents, the a hard time really question is not that it
unrelenting dailiness accepting that life/ is spirit that drives this
of war, famine, death is a whole longer, more
plague. And yet, package. complete line, but
encountering the the encounter with
absolute indisputable GC: You speak of death: as if writing
irrevocable fact of your spiritual life. This against death,
our imper manent is more present in the despite death, to be
natures has also line than ever before. less inclined towards
been intensely Do you believe your breakage.
liberating. I feel very for m is different on
humbled and the page? What are GC: Please talk about
grateful that I was the changes since compassion in your
Nahem Shoa
[Link]
Lenkiewicz from the age of There a many great artist throughout history and today that have
inspired my painting practice and changed my life. If I had to
sixteen to twenty six. He also make a list, Rembrandt, Titian, Velazquez, Tintoretto, Veronese,
completed a degree in Bellini, Vermeer, Ruben’s, Chardin, Goya, Ingres, Turner,
Manchester University and Constable, Gericault, Delacroix, Courbet, Degas, Monet,
later a Post grad in drawing Cezanne, Rodin, Van Gogh, Bonnard, Picasso, Matisse, Braque,
in The Prince of Wales Morandi, De kooning, Rothko, Bomberg, Auerbach, Freud,
Drawing School. His work Bacon, Uglow and Lenkiewicz. There is at least another fifty
names missing from this list. My biggest influences are the painter
has been exhibited in major Robert Lenkiewicz, who taught me painting for ten years. If it
British museums such as, weren’t for him I wouldn’t be an artist today. When I paint I am
The Royal Academy and always thinking of Cezanne, Monet and Freud, somewhere
National Portrait Gallery, between the three of them is my vision of nature.
London. In the last four years
How do you choose your subject matter?
he has had four major I never choose my subject matter and have no idea what the
one-man exhibitions in next project will be. What draws me to things is often quite
museums across England, random, but once I start to paint and I can grasp the unlimited
and his work featured along potential of the subject, this usually leads to a series of works
side Lucian Freud, Frank on the same theme. I get deeply inspired by things that at first
Auerbach, Robert I didn’t even see, that’s natures magic. I tend to work slowly
and spend up to a year on a painting and up to two months
Lenkiewicz and David on a drawing.
Bomberg. In August, 2008
his work is to be Included in What was the first piece of art you were paid for?
Threadneedle figurative art When I was a first year painting student In Manchester I used to
prize, The Mall galleries, paint copies of 18th century portraits for my local Butcher, who
London. His has five used to pay me in meat and vegetables.
paintings in National Do you have a ritual or specific process you follow when
collections around England. creating art?
I don’t work with a specific process that I follow when creating
art, but there is a kind of pattern that I follow. I tend to repaint
almost all of the canvas each time I work on it because I always
want my painting’s to be about the now, painting what I see
when I see it. I don’t trust if areas of my paintings come too easy
for me, and will always paint those bits out. I would hope that
by the end of a picture that the paint itself has become a force
of nature in itself and not a mere copy. My motto is, “you are
only as good as your last painting,” this drives me to alway take
my work further.
What is your secret weapon?
My secret weapon is knowledge combined with vision. Being
trained by Robert Lenkiewicz was the greatest prize life could
Victoria Mckenzie have given me.
129 ORANGES & SARDINES
If Piccasso were a poet, this ice cream to think so.” These are all
would be his signature. Juxtaposed excellent bumper-sticker material.
mismatched fragments of observation Zingers! I’ll buy them by the dozens.
and generalization lain into quick Allow me this poem in it’s entirety,
paragraphs of Burroughsesque tellings as my favorite:
that, as a whole, splendidly jive. The
snippets of quasi-philosophical thought, vi.x
as in “chapter 1.1” where we are
informed “West is not west if you’re The hangover crept up on him
west, south or north of it.” for some midafternoon. Sing to the bird its
reason had me thinking of The Wizard song. Syntactical tomfoolery, void
of Oz’s Scarecrow. Then “The senior where inhibited. He’s from the
author is the first one listed, an et. al. Canadian Midwest, which isn’t much
Othered at the ass-end of the listing better. Batter-dipped cover corner,
experience.” brought his receiving his but no mention of apartheid.
diploma (brain) scene to mind. Danger, beauty, then danger more,
Then a sullen eloquence sneaks nowever, how not now, then when?
in .. “Listen to my lips is a deaf breath” Every price has its discount. Prisoner
replacing Oz with a more sultry visual. stripes are horizontal and referee
Misty and humid. I think Mickey Rourke stripes are vertical. It had all the
& Faye Dunaway in Bar Fly .. deaf makings of a trust issue. Nobody
breaths of intoxication ... both of lust orders it for the parsley, but no one
and liquor. And they listened. Intently. would stand to be deprived. White is
There is a cornucopia of great equated with surrender. He was
lines in each piece; “Rage is anger white and getting whiter.
that doesn’t follow the recipe.” -
“Wouldn’t it be funny if all wars were It brings to mind one of those
the products of misinformation?” puzzles where all the pieces are there,
(You mean they aren’t?) - If you have a in front of you in a nice tidy box, and
vivid imagination, you don’t need you have to arrange them to create
anesthetized.” – “He said: if it’s culture the intended picture. Yeah... that’s
I need, then I’ll lease it.” - “It melted his what it’s like.
133 ORANGES & SARDINES
Patrick Duggan
[Link]
5.
Clovers growing out of the door jambs.
His face has been stenciled in.
6.
There is architecture
just as there is mathematics
mountain ranges
visible only from space.
7.
A poet jittery against a pink wall.
His stubble is making inroads.
8.
A wet canvas of busted bicycle tires.
An avenging angel of espresso and bluegrass
all robot tattoos and damaged longitude.
9.
His clouds
are the bones of a coelacanth
kissing the wingtips of pigeons.
10.
America goes on laughing.
11.
An Etch-A-Sketch knot of denim.
One hundred sentences in which I’m a car.
Unapologetic
beach, pino grigio, hardcore punk
through an open car window.
You, a fallen acoustic angel
a morning star searing skin making war
against my daydreams
chained and blue. Every line I end
is an exorcism of hope, a burial
a wish and you
an alert halo of air,
eyes the sky’s color at five
in the morning. I’ve managed the past
twenty-four years without a cell mate,
tattooed awkward artwork
from picture books, portraits of saints.
I am a sheet rock wall
over hollow space - knock
on my skin
it echoes.
Patrick Duggan
136 ORANGES & SARDINES
If you’re reading this then there does matter. You really don’t care
is a good chance that you’re that they read the poem, and they
considered the “artsy-fartsy” one in really don’t know what to say about it.
your family. Perhaps you are the one You don’t regularly share your poems
who studied something interesting and with people who don’t appreciate
“impractical” in college, like writing them, let alone people who know you,
— especially writing poetry. Your people to whom you are vulnerable.
grandmother or aunt introduces you to Or maybe you don’t even
friends as “the writer,” or the redundant bother to show them after all.
“published author,” though they never Or you send them a link to your
inquire to actually read any of that poem online, and imagine their
stuff you write. Being an impractical crinkled up faces as they try to
poet in a world of streamlining and decipher what childhood memory
high mobility seems archaic, but this is you’re referring to and are they
not a column lamenting the woes of a responsible for this? Is this some kind
society that fails to appreciate the arts. of charge upon their upbringing of
Rather, this is a column about being you? Now, you’re just embarrassing
the one who does. the family.
So, you have a poem in a Nicole Cartwright Denison,
literary magazine. You hand the author of the chapbook Recovering
printed book to your mom and dad to the Body, (Dancing Girl Press, 2007)
show them, “Look! I’m published! and Co-Editor of Tilt Press, describes
Someone thought my poem was this strange phenomenon she
valuable enough to do so.” You do this experiences with her mother as “the
because you don’t think they ever squinch:”
really understood what it was you do
with your poetry (who reads poetry?), Upon her initial reading I feel squinchy,
and now you have some proof that it as if she’ll figure out I wasn’t always a
137 ORANGES & SARDINES
virgin, trying to suss out some hidden reading, dedicated a poem to her.
event, or wonder where she went The poem was beautiful, raw, and
wrong in parenting, feeling responsible exact; depicting a mother whose
for my dark, poetic feelings. Usually, privacy is invaded by her children,
she mutters something about how she while she nakedly attempts to shave
can’t understand all the “hidden her underarms. Despite the quality of
meanings” and how she just doesn’t the poem, I couldn’t help thinking that
“get” literature, especially poetry, such an unveiling of truth, even in art,
sometimes. Again, the squinch can feel like the stark bright lights of
overtakes me since she’s the woman inspection being shone upon one —
who’s responsible for my literary right there in a public café crowded
background; I cut my teeth on her with people whose eyes are darting
books and she read to me and bought between poet and the mother of
me any book I asked for, and even whom she was speaking. To borrow a
some I didn’t. She was always an astute phrase, I squinched. I held my breath.
student of literature and imbued me I wondered how my own mother might
with a deep love and reverence for it. react, but the mother of this scene
She’s my greatest influence and for that proudly wipes a tear from her eye as
I’m eternally grateful. She’s also the first the speaker takes her seat amongst
person to receive a copy of my applause. The poem does its job of
chapbook: I’m not sure she’s read it encapsulating veracity, candor, and
yet, but it’s there with all the others, brilliance, even if nakedness — literal
waiting in its vainglory. It doesn’t hurt and figurative — is a part of that
she bribes me with presents upon equation.
publications either; it’s kind of like still Then, there is the topic of
being on The Honor Roll. sexuality which the customary
American eyes and ears encounter in
It’s that sort of a bittersweet ways that are not necessarily in the
accomplishment: there will likely be vein of the aforementioned benefit of
some questions incited by all of those art, but rather in an element of
images of body parts and explosions. scandal. So, offering your beloved
I recently took part in a reading in poetry to someone with the untrained
downtown South Bend, Indiana. eye (read: second-rate Hollywood
Another participant brought along her amusement-driven) becomes a
mother, and during her portion of the gamble, but the writer knows that it
isn’t for the opinion of the work itself Naoko Fujimoto, a graduate
that it is being exhibited, but rather for student at Indiana University has a solid
the appreciation of those whose stock of darlings of her own, across the
judgments are realized. This issue of globe in Japan, cheering her on in her
writing about sexuality might become educational endeavors here in the
a consideration when one’s own states. They know their daughter is a
children happen upon the writing. talented writer — they can find her
Charmi Keranen wrote and published work online, but when they use Google
a short non-fiction piece, “Train Translate something gets lost in the
Language” in the online magazine translation — like a context for all of
Slow Trains. In it she compares the these sensual images.
thundering, powerful trains heard Film Director David Cronenberg
outside her bedroom windows to the in an interview with Scott Macaulay
activities taking place within the in September 2007 says something
bedroom. The trains become a about art that might explain why
soundtrack and metaphor to the the squinch experience occurs when
sentiment of lovemaking. “Train one’s bare naked poetry is exposed in
Language” won an award and was broad daylight to the lion’s share
published by her University, and it is of society: “The idea of a mass
very likely that her teenaged children audience is an invention of the
have read it. Industrial Revolution.”
We the poets are ever so
The fact that I write empowers my kids aware of this by the piling on and
to write. They see it as a valid means of injecting of labels and categories of
expression and exploring the world. contemporary poetry. We camp out
They don’t seem to be embarrassed at with schools of thought and try to
all by my topics. In fact, they show my
predict, create, and join movements,
and none of this is apparent nor of any
writing to their friends. I think it also
relevance to the non-poet. Instead our
helps them see me as a whole person,
poem stands before him, looks him
not just as their mom. The other day
dead in the eye, and smears the
[my daughter] Jojo said, “Before I get raucous essence of ourselves out in
married I’d like you to buy me a sex front of him for him. How could we
book.” I said, “Okay, how soon should possibly ask the trusted thing to do
I be shopping?” anything less?
MiPO
OCHO
[Link]