Strain Theory and Delinquent Subcultures
Strain Theory and Delinquent Subcultures
Societal expectations play a critical role in fostering criminal activities, as highlighted by the strain, subcultural, and differential opportunity theories. These theories demonstrate that societal pressure to achieve conventional success can lead to criminal behavior when legitimate avenues are blocked. Agnew's theory notes that failing to meet positively valued societal goals results in strain, leading individuals to find alternative routes, including crime, to achieve those goals . Cohen's theory emphasizes that inability to achieve middle-class standards fosters status frustration, prompting some youths to embrace deviant subcultures . Meanwhile, the Differential Opportunity Theory suggests that lack of opportunities results in the creation of gang subcultures as alternative means of achieving success . Together, these perspectives argue that social structures and expectations can unintentionally promote criminal behavior by creating scenarios where crime becomes a rational choice for those marginalized by the system.
Matza's concept of 'drift' explains the intermittent nature of criminal behavior by suggesting that delinquents move between conforming and non-conforming conduct based on circumstances. According to Matza, even committed criminals are not entangled in a crime continuously; instead, they experience periods of conventional behavior influenced by familial, educational, or social events. Techniques of neutralization allow them to justify their deviance temporarily, enabling them to engage in criminal acts without abandoning their conventional beliefs entirely. This concept acknowledges that delinquents are not static in their behavior; instead, they navigate between different behavioral states across a continuum, influenced by subterranean values and situational opportunities .
The Differential Opportunity Theory posits that while all individuals share similar success goals, the means to achieve these goals are unequally distributed across social classes. In lower-class environments where legitimate means are limited, individuals seek alternatives such as forming gangs. According to Cloward and Ohlin, this leads to the formation of three types of gangs based on the environment: 'criminal gangs' flourish in stable lower-class areas conducive to organized crime; 'conflict gangs' emerge in disorganized areas where violence is used to establish respect and status; and 'retreatist gangs' include individuals who fail to achieve success through criminal or legitimate means, forming groups characterized by a focus on drugs and escapism. These different gang types are adaptations to their socio-economic environments, each offering paths to status and identity not available through conventional means .
Cohen's theory on 'corner boys,' 'college boys,' and 'delinquent boys' offers nuanced insights into juvenile delinquency by exploring how lower-class youths adapt to status frustration. 'Corner boys' may engage in minor deviance to cope with status frustration, often opting for non-confrontational peers and minor offenses. 'College boys' strive to assimilate and compete within the prevailing middle-class culture despite significant socio-economic challenges, aspiring to succeed by its standards. In contrast, 'delinquent boys' reject societal norms outright and often engage in gang activities and persistent delinquency, challenging the mainstream values they cannot achieve. These categorizations show how different responses to social constraints manifest in various forms and intensities of delinquent behavior . This framework assists in tailoring interventions and understanding the diverse trajectories of youths based on their responses to socio-economic barriers.
The 'techniques of neutralization' provide psychological mechanisms that allow individuals to drift between deviant and conventional behaviors. These techniques include denying responsibility, injury, or the victim, and they enable individuals to rationalize and justify their criminal actions temporarily. For instance, offenders may claim that their actions were not their fault or that the injuries were minor and excusable. By neutralizing the guilt associated with their actions, individuals maintain their self-image and societal bonds while engaging in deviant acts. This process explains the fluid movement between lawful and unlawful behaviors, where individuals balance their participation in conventional society with deviant acts influenced by subterranean values .
Agnew's General Strain Theory extends the original strain theory by identifying a broader range of strains and emphasizing the role of negative affective states such as anger, frustration, and depression as precursors to criminal behavior. Unlike earlier theories which primarily focused on lower-class crime, Agnew's approach considers strains experienced across all socioeconomic classes. These strains arise from the failure to achieve positively valued goals, the disjunction between expectations and achievements, the removal of positive stimuli, and the presence of negative stimuli. For example, individuals might engage in criminal acts when they perceive unfairness or when they aim to remedy the loss of valued stimuli, as illustrated through personal revenge scenarios . This broader perspective implies that criminal behavior can be a response to various life-strains, making it a more inclusive explanation applicable to diverse societal classes .
According to Agnew's reformulated strain theory, the presentation of negative stimuli can lead to criminal behavior as individuals respond to these adverse situations. Negative stimuli trigger negative affective states like anger and frustration, which can pressure individuals towards criminal paths as a form of coping. For instance, adverse experiences such as unfair treatment or hostile environments may compel individuals to react with criminal acts as a means of retaliation against perceived injustices or as a method to escape or mediate their distress . This aspect of strain theory highlights the impact of environmental and situational factors in fostering criminal behavior.
Cohen's concept of 'status frustration' arises from lower-class youths' inability to achieve success through legitimate means within the middle-class hierarchy, leading to cultural conflict. Unable to meet these societal expectations due to economic and social constraints, these youths experience frustration and seek validation through alternate means. They form deviant subcultures where the standards and norms differ from those of the mainstream middle-class values. This adaptation is manifested in groups that Cohen categorizes as 'corner boys,' 'college boys,' and 'delinquent boys.' Each group handles status frustration differently, with the 'delinquent boy' directly opposing middle-class values, often forming gangs and engaging in unlawful behavior to gain status and identity within their immediate social environment .
The subcultural perspective suggests that crime persists in disorganized neighborhoods because of the development of an independent subculture with distinct norms and values that clash with mainstream societal rules. In these environments, residents experience social isolation and economic deprivation, leading to subcultural norms that emphasize immediate gratification, toughness, and risk-taking. These values often conflict with conventional societal expectations, resulting in behaviors that are deemed criminal. For example, individuals in these neighborhoods may engage in criminal activity due to loyalty to their subculture, seeking respect and validation within it rather than attempting to conform to a society that marginalizes them .
Subcultural theories suggest that the transformation of slum dwellers into law violators is influenced by the clash between the values of their deviant subculture and conventional societal norms. Economic deprivation and social disorganization foster environments where individuals do not see traditional means as viable paths to success. In response, they adopt subcultural norms that prioritize behaviors contrary to mainstream laws, such as toughness, risk-taking, and immediate gratification. This alignment with subcultural values over societal laws often leads slum dwellers to engage in criminal activities as a way to achieve recognition and status within their community .


