0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views4 pages

hw4 UM101 Soln

1. The document provides hints and sketches of solutions to homework problems from a course on analysis and linear algebra. It outlines solutions for 5 problems on topics like bounded sequences, limits of sequences, series convergence tests, and trigonometric series. 2. For each problem, it gives a high-level outline of the solution approach rather than a full worked solution. Examples, inequalities, and theorems are referenced to guide the reasoning without explicitly showing all steps. 3. The goal is to help students obtain complete solutions themselves while introducing useful techniques like partial fraction decomposition, telescoping series, and comparison tests to common series.

Uploaded by

ice water
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views4 pages

hw4 UM101 Soln

1. The document provides hints and sketches of solutions to homework problems from a course on analysis and linear algebra. It outlines solutions for 5 problems on topics like bounded sequences, limits of sequences, series convergence tests, and trigonometric series. 2. For each problem, it gives a high-level outline of the solution approach rather than a full worked solution. Examples, inequalities, and theorems are referenced to guide the reasoning without explicitly showing all steps. 3. The goal is to help students obtain complete solutions themselves while introducing useful techniques like partial fraction decomposition, telescoping series, and comparison tests to common series.

Uploaded by

ice water
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

UM 101 : ANALYSIS & LINEAR ALGEBRA – I

“AUTUMN” 2020
HINTS/SKETCH OF SOLUTIONS TO HOMEWORK 4 PROBLEMS

Instructor: GAUTAM BHARALI Assigned: DECEMBER 10, 2020

PLEASE NOTE: Only in rare circumstances will complete solutions be provided! What
follows are hints for solving a problem or sketches of the solutions meant to help you through the
difficult parts (or, sometimes, to introduce a nice trick). You are encouraged to use these to obtain
complete solutions.

1. Let {an } be a real sequence. We say “{an } is bounded” if the set {an : n = 1, 2, 3, . . . } is
bounded above and bounded below. Show that if {an } converges, then it is bounded.
Tip. If {c1 , c2 , . . . , cN } ⊂ R is a finite set, then you may freely assume that the meaning of
max(c1 , c2 , . . . , cN ) is sup c1 , c2 , . . . , cN — which is the meaning you have taken for granted so
far — without justifying that the former exists.
Solution: As {an } converges, call its limit L. By definition, ∃ N ∈ P, N ≥ 2, such that
|an − L| < 1 ∀ n ≥ N.
⇒ L − 1 < an < L + 1 ∀ n ≥ N. (1)
Write M := max(|a1 |, . . . |aN −1 |). Then, as −|aj | ≤ aj ≤ |aj | ∀ j ∈ P,
−M ≤ aj ≤ M for j = 1, 2, . . . , N − 1.
Combining this with (1), we have
min(−M, L − 1) ≤ an ≤ max(M, L + 1) ∀ n ∈ P.
By definition, therefore, the set {an : n = 1, 2, 3, . . . } is bounded above and below; hence {an } is
bounded.

2. Let {an } and {bn } be convergent sequences with limits A and B, respectively. Prove that the
sequence {an bn } converges and that limn→∞ an bn = AB.
Solution: As {an } and {bn } are convergent, by Problem 1, there exist positive numbers M1 and
M2 such that
−M1 ≤ an ≤ M1 and − M2 ≤ bn ≤ M2 ∀ n ∈ P (2)
Fix  > 0. As limn→∞ an = A and limn→∞ bn = B, ∃ N1 , N2 ∈ P such that
M1
|bn − B| < ∀ n ≥ N1 ,
2
|an − A| < ∗ ∀ n ≥ N2 ,
where ∗ is a positive real such that 0 < |B|∗ < /2. Write N := max(N1 , N2 ). We now compute
|an bn − AB| = |(an bn − an B) + (an B − AB)|
≤ |an ||bn − B| + |B||an − A|
|an |
< + |B|∗ ∀ n ≥ N
2M1
< /2 + /2 ∀ n ≥ N. [using (2)]

1
Thus, by definition, limn→∞ an bn = AB.
P∞
3. In each case below, show that the series n=1 an converges, and find the sum:

a) an = 1/(2n − 1)(2n + 1)

b) an = 1/(n2 − 1)

c) an = n/(n + 1)(n + 2)(n + 3)


√ √ √
d) an = ( n + 1 − n)/ n2 + n

Sketch of solution: We make a correction to part P (b) [which was communicated via Microsoft
Teams]: namely, for part (b), consider the series ∞
n=2 an .
We shall provide the solution of part (a). The solutions of (b) and (c) will follow from similar
partial-fraction arguments.

a) Let us write if possible

1 A B
= + ∀ x ∈ R − {±1/2}. (3)
(2x − 1)(2x + 1) 2x − 1 2x + 1

Note that

(3) is true ⇐⇒ A(2x + 1) + B(2x − 1) = 1 ∀ x ∈ R


(
2A + 2B = 0
⇐⇒
A − B = 1,

by high-school algebra. The latter equation has the unique solution (A, B) = (1/2, −1/2).
Thus, it follows that

1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2


an = − = − ∀ n = 1, 2, 3, . . .
2n − 1 2n + 1 2n − 1 2(n + 1) − 1

Thus, the given series is a telescoping series and the bn appearing in the convergence theorem
for telescoping series is

1/2 1/2n
bn = = ∀ n = 1, 2, 3, . . .
2n − 1 2 − (1/n)

Since limn→∞ 1/n = 0, the denominator of the R.H.S. above has the limit 2 6= 0. Thus, by
the theorem on limits of quotient sequences

limn→∞ 1/2n
lim bn = = 0.
n→∞ 2
Hence, by the convergence theorem,

X 1
= b1 − lim bn = 1/2.
(2n − 1)(2n + 1) n→∞
n=1

2
d) Observe that √ √
n+1− n 1 1
√ =√ −√ ∀ n = 1, 2, 3, . . .
n2 + n n n+1
This is clearly a telescoping series and the bn appearing in the convergence theorem for
telescoping series is
1 1
bn = √ = 1/2 ∀ n = 1, 2, 3, . . .
n n
Now, argue as in the last few sentences of the solution to part (a) to get
∞ √ √
X n+1− n
√ = 1.
n 2+n
n=1

P∞
4.
P∞ Fix some positive integer N . Show that the series n=1 an is convergent if and only if the series
n=N an is convergent.

Sketch of solution: Let us consider the n-th partial sums of the two series given to us (we may take
N ≥ 2, since there’s nothing to prove when N = 1):
n
X X−1
n+N
sn := aj and Sn := aj .
j=1 j=N

Let us write C := a1 + · · · + aN −1 . Then, we have

Sn = sn − C ∀n ≥ N

Now use the above equation and the definition of the convergence of infinite series to complete the
proof.

5. Determine whether or not each of the following non-negative series converges. Give justifica-
tions.

a) (Apostol, 10.14, Prob. 1) ∞


P
n=1 n/(4n − 3)(4n − 1)
P∞ 2 2
b) n=1 | sin(5n )|/n
P∞ n
 n
c) n=1 3 + (−1) /3

d) (Apostol, 10.14, Prob. 7) ∞


P
n=1 n!/(n + 2)!
P∞ n
e) n=1 bn /5 , where {bn } is a bounded sequence with non-negative terms.

Sketch of solution: Sketches of each of the parts are as follows:

a) We intuit that the n-th term of this series is comparable


P∞ to c/n for some c > 0, whence the
series diverges. Thus, we need a non-negative series n=1 cn that is divergent such that
n
0 ≤ cn ≤ ∀ n ≥ N.
(4n − 3)(4n − 1)

3
Now, observe:
1 1 n n
≤ = ≤ ∀ n = 1, 2, 3, . . . (4)
16n 4(4n − 3) (4n)(4n − 3) (4n − 1)(4n − 3)

By the p-series test ∞


P
n=1 1/16n diverges. Combining this with (4), the comparison test tells
us that the given series diverges.
Now, use the above as a template to solve (d), except that in this case the series
converges.

(b) Observe that


| sin 5n2 | 1
2
≤ 2 ∀ n = 1, 2, . . .
n n
Now complete the argument, using the camparison test, showing that the given series con-
verges.

Part (c) can be argued in a manner very similar to the solution of (e) (of which (c) is a special
case). Therefore, we present

(e) Since {bn } is a bounded sequence, and all terms are non-negative, ∃ u ∈ R such that 0 ≤ bn ≤ u
∀ n = 1, 2, 3, . . . Thus
bn u
0 ≤ n ≤ n ∀ n = 1, 2, 3, . . . (5)
5 5
Since ∞ u
P
n=1 5n is a convergent geometric series, the comparison test, combines with (5) tells
us that the given series converges.

Common questions

Powered by AI

For the series ∑∞_{n=1} b_n/5^n, given {b_n} is a bounded sequence, use the Comparison Test with geometric series. Knowing 0 ≤ b_n ≤ u where 'u' bounds the series, it follows 0 ≤ b_n/5^n ≤ u/5^n. Since ∑∞_{n=1} u/5^n is a convergent geometric series (with ratio less than 1), the original series converges by the Comparison Test .

A real sequence {an} is considered bounded if the set {an : n = 1, 2, 3, ...} is bounded both above and below. This means there exist real numbers m and M such that m ≤ an ≤ M for all n. If {an} converges to a limit L, there exists an index N such that for all n ≥ N, |an - L| < 1, implying L - 1 < an < L + 1. Thus, for the indices n less than N, let M be the maximum absolute value of {a1, a2, ..., aN-1}. Consequently, for all n, |an| is bounded by max(|a1|,...,|aN-1|) and {an} is bounded .

For the series with terms of the form n/(4n-3)(4n-1), one uses the Comparison Test. The given terms are intuitively compared to 1/(4n), a divergent p-series. Specifically, 1/(4n) ≤ n/(4n-3)(4n-1) for all n ≥ 1. Therefore, using the comparison test, since ∑∞_{n=1} 1/(4n) diverges, the given series also diverges .

To determine the convergence of the series ∑∞_{n=1} n!/(n+2)!, compare its terms with known simpler forms. Observe that n!/(n+2)! simplifies to 1/((n+1)(n+2)). Recognize this series as telescopic—terms cancel out through partial fraction decomposition. Careful evaluation shows convergence by examining limits and noting cancellation patterns, significantly simplifying the overall behavior to converge .

Prove that a sequence such as {an} is convergent and bounded by leveraging a relation to another sequence {bn} and using convergence properties. If {bn} converges to B, and |an - bn| is bounded by a constant, then any oscillation in {an} can be limited, establishing its convergence to the same limit as {bn}. Moreover, by convergence, the sequence must be bounded by nature of being trapped within fluctuating bounds indefinitely .

To prove the convergence of the series ∑∞_{n=1} |sin(5n²)|/n², apply the Comparison Test. Notice that |sin(5n²)| ≤ 1, thus |sin(5n²)|/n² ≤ 1/n². The series ∑∞_{n=1} 1/n² is a convergent p-series with p = 2 > 1. Therefore, by the Comparison Test, ∑∞_{n=1} |sin(5n²)|/n² also converges .

Telescoping series are a significant tool in determining convergence and computing sums by revealing cancellation patterns in series terms. When decomposed correctly, each term of a telescoping series effectively cancels out other terms, simplifying the structure enormously. This enables the extraction of finite sums from potentially complex infinite series. Such use underscores the elegance and power of algebraic transformations in uncovering simple convergence scenarios .

The convergence of the series ∑∞_{n=N} a_n implies the convergence of the entire series ∑∞_{n=1} a_n. When considering partial sums, s_n = a_1 + a_2 + ... + a_n and S_n = a_N + a_{N+1} + ... a_{n+N-1}, the series differ by a finite sum C = a_1 + ... + a_{N-1}. Therefore, if ∑∞_{n=N} a_n converges, ∑∞_{n=1} a_n converges as the addition or removal of a finite number of terms does not affect convergence .

To evaluate the series ∑∞_{n=1} 1/(2n-1)(2n+1), decompose each term using partial fractions. Set it as 1/(2n-1)(2n+1) = A/(2n-1) + B/(2n+1) and solve for A and B through algebraic identities. This yields A = 1/2 and B = -1/2, transforming the series into a telescoping one. Such series often simplify as terms cancel in sequences of partial sums, revealing convergence and allowing direct sum evaluation .

To prove that the product of two convergent sequences {an} and {bn} with limits A and B converges to AB, we use the property of boundedness and the definition of convergence. Since both sequences converge, there exist bounds M1 and M2 such that |an| ≤ M1 and |bn| ≤ M2. Fix any ε > 0, and choose N1, N2 such that |an - A| < ε/2M1 and |bn - B| < ε/2|A| for n ≥ N1, N2. For n ≥ max(N1, N2), it follows that |anbn - AB| ≤ |an||bn - B| + |B||an - A| < ε. Therefore, the product sequence converges to AB .

You might also like