Factors Affecting Classroom Discipline of Grade 5 Pupils: An Observational Study
I. Abstract
This basic research employed the descriptive observational design in
determining the prevailing discipline of the grade 5 pupils, and involved all of the
32 Grade 5 pupils of the teacher researcher composed of 14 boys and 18 girls.
The primary instrument for data collection was the observation checklist of
common misbehaviors of the pupils. The anecdotal records of the pupils was also
used as secondary data gathering tool.
Among the identified misbehaviors, rank 1 is Nakikipagkwentuhan habang
may klase. When the teacher-researcher is discussing the lessons, many pupils
tend to start conversations with their seatmates. Rank 2 is Malikot sa klase at
malimit na tumatayo o palakad-lakad habang may leksiyon. Many pupils display
naughtiness or playfulness in class even when the teacher is discussing the
lesson, and more frequently when they are given activities. These pupils show
signs of hyperactivity which at times disrupt the on-going activities. Rank 3 is
Naglalaro o gumuguhit ng mga larawan sa papel imbes na makinig sa guro.
Many pupils tend to doodle on their notebooks or play games in secret while the
teacher is talking in front.
With this research as basis, the researcher will be formally proposing the
Project BREAD or Behavioral Reinforcement to Encourage and Appreciate
Discipline, which is a system of behavioral modification and reinforcement
gestures and activities that the teacher performs to encourage good classroom
behavior among pupils. The project also intensifies home visits and dialogs with
the pupils’ parents as an intervention to address classroom misbehaviors,
habitual tardiness and truancy
II. Acknowledgement
The researcher expresses her sincerest gratitude to the following who helped
her in the conduct of this action research:
Her school head, for the approval and encouragement in the conduct of this
research,
Her pupils, for the willingness to be part of the study,
The parents, for their consent in allowing the pupils to be involved in the
research,
Her kids, who are her inspiration in life
Her husband, who is always supportive of her, especially in pursuing
professional growth, and
The Almighty Father, for the grace of wisdom and strength to persevere
amidst the challenges in the practice of her profession, and in life in general.
III. Introduction of the Research
The task of providing quality education to all children of the world entails
many problems and contributory factors in and out of school. Reports of
problematic behaviors are on the rise not only in the classroom but in society.
Students engage in problematic behaviors because of health problems, personal
or family problems, adjustment or developmental issues (e.g., “immaturity” or
self-esteem issues), or general academic difficulties. These factors are not
controllable, but teachers who feel those are issues are at play can certainly refer
students to the appropriate support services on campus. Many problems in any
school system are student related and that the immediate source of discipline is
the faculty. Since teachers are in constant contact with students, they are
primarily involved in the task of implementing the school policies and rules and
regulations inside, and to an extent, even outside the school premises.
The Supreme Court of Florida demands that:
“As to mental training, moral and physical discipline and welfare of
the public, college authorities stand in loco parents and their
discretion may make any regulations for their government which a
parent could make for the same purposes so long as such
regulations do not violate divine or human laws...”
It has to be stressed that disciplining students does not take the nature of a
punishment, this should be clear to students, teachers and school heads alike.
There are penalties and sanctions that are embodied in schools for violations of
the policies, rules and regulation set by the school but they are not punishments.
Moreover, the purpose of imposing discipline in school is to make the students
realize that there are norms for conduct in every learning institution. With
discipline inside the school starting in the classroom, quality education can be
achieved.
Article XIV, Sec 3 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution states that:
“All educational institutions shall inculcate patriotism and
Nationalism, foster love of the humanity, respect for human right,
appreciation of the role of national heroes in historical
development of the country, teach the rights and duties of
citizenry, struggle ethical and spiritual values develop moral
character and personal discipline, encourage critical and creative
thinking, broaden scientific and technological knowledge and
promote vocational efficiency.”
This broad mandate requires the government to promulgate implementing
laws, policies and programs toward the realization of this constitutional provision.
Part of the mandate is the development of moral character and personal
discipline among learners. Likewise, the Department of Education (DepEd) in its
jurisdiction has disseminated pertinent administrative issuances directing schools
to pursue their educational purposes.
With the implementation, and in many cases, misinterpretation of DepEd
Order No. 40 s. 2012, known as the “Policy and Guidelines on Protecting
Children in School from Abuse, Violence, Exploitation, Discrimination, Bullying
and Other Forms of Abuse”, and other relevant mandates, teachers have
become cautious and disinclined to impose strict disciplinary measures in
classrooms for fear of legal complaints. A handful of cases were already
interpreted as extortions, where parents and relatives go after monetary
arrangements to settle “child abuse” complaints. More than ever, behavior
problems in school interfere with learning — for all students in the classroom.
Children’s impulsivity, aggression, inattention, or hyperactivity gets them in
trouble with the teacher and classmates.
In order to achieve effective and productive teaching-learning process, the
teacher should consider his or her classroom management style as one of the
vital factors to be given extra attention. Premised on the given ideas and insights,
the researcher is motivated to conduct an investigation to assess the classroom
discipline of her Grade 5 pupils.
IV. Literature Review
Students will misbehave in class. Teachers must anticipate the misbehaviors
of pupils and have an array of strategies to react to and address them. The
efforts for ideal daily learning logs or lesson plans go to waste when students
become disruptive in class. Teachers must be effective not only in lesson delivery
but also in managing a class of individually unique learners who are
psychologically expected to display disruptive behaviors.
Good and Brophy (2002) defined Classroom management as a
term teachers use to describe the process of ensuring that classroom lessons run
smoothly despite disruptive behavior by students. The term also implies the
prevention of disruptive behavior. It encompasses the administration or direction
of activities with special reference to such problems as discipline, democratic
techniques, use and care of supplies and reference materials, the physical
features of the classroom, general house-keeping, and the social relationships of
learners.
According to Adeyemo (2012) “Good classroom management can help to
ensure protection of students from physical attacks by other students, dangerous
environmental conditions such as playing around electrical equipment, and from
psychological abuse from peers or adults”. It is therefore imperative that
classroom teachers make use of a classroom management style that is most
effective for a particular class.
Stoughton (2007) asserted that to avoid discipline problems, teachers need to
acquire and employ classroom management strategies. These management
strategies should cater to the individual students. A teacher should therefore
continue to update himself not only with teaching strategies, but also
management strategies to be used inside the classroom to address different
class groups and the individual students.
It is important to understand there are many contextual factors that influence
student behavior. At the classroom level, teachers make many decisions that
impact on student behavior. For example, decisions about the physical layout of
the classroom routines, class content and teacher actions all affect student
behavior. At the school level, staff beliefs about children can strongly guide what
is considered “acceptable” ways of treating students. The school policies, the
community and the architecture of the school can all impact on student behavior.
These factors may adversely influence a child to act or react contradictory to
what is conventionally described as good behavior.
Rogel (2012) stated in her paper that a classroom teacher should be alert to
catch the distinguishable behaviors after displayed by the pupils such as acts of
aggression namely: noisiness, teasing, unnecessary talking, quarrelling,
disorderliness, outbursts, being domineering, critical of others, resentful of
criticism; acts of delinquency such as being untruthful, destructiveness, cutting
classes, taking articles that belong to others, and disobedience; withdrawing
behavior consisting of shyness, neglect of school work, unsociable behaviors;
non-compliant behaviors such as untidiness and ignoring simple school rules.
Kelly (n.d.) stressed that teachers might not be able to stop all forms of
misbehavior before they start, however, they have complete control over their
own reactions to student behavioral issues. Teachers must therefore choose their
responses wisely, making sure that they are appropriate and logical. The old
adage, "the punishment must fit the crime," is especially true in a classroom
setting. Students will learn less the teacher chooses something illogical, than if
her response directly relates to the situation, or they might miss out on important
information being taught in class that day. It is therefore critical for the classroom
teacher to adopt a classroom management approach that she deems most
appropriate for her class.
Katipunan (2000) explained in his book the purpose of imposing discipline in
schools is to make them realize that there is a norm of conduct in every learning
situation. Personal discipline in a democracy demands self-respect, self-direction,
and self-control. Students should be assisted in earning experiences for social
living. The problems of young children are rooted in the home and their
immediate environment.
Imposing discipline helps children learn how to behave – as well as how not
to behave. Discipline works best when it’s firm but fair and when the teacher has
a warm and loving relationship with the children. Discipline does not necessarily
mean punishment. Punishment by itself does not guide children towards what
they should do – it teaches children only what they should not do. Punishment
does not mean physical punishment. Physical punishments only hurt children but
do not teach them how to behave.
Henry (2002) asserted in his article that effective teachers continue to
reinforce positive behaviors and attitudes and introduce new procedures and
management strategies to further strengthen a well-organized classroom setting.
Children need to be taught so that they understand and follow social rules. But it
is not necessary, and can be quite damaging, to hit and otherwise abuse a
student. Evidence shows that girls and boys respond better to positive
approaches including negotiation and systems of rewards, rather than
punishment through verbal, physical, or emotional abuse.
There is no simple resolution for problematic behavior, and it is not possible
to apply a blanket approach to all circumstances. This makes discipline in
schools very complex. Schools obviously need to be engaging and safe for
students to learn. However, there is often a great focus on what happens in the
classroom. This means teachers are often left to work with students in isolation
and manage student behavior issues by themselves.
When an issue becomes difficult to manage, the school is often left with little
choice but to remove the offending student from the learning environment. A
more helpful and sustainable approach is for all the teachers who teach a specific
student who is misbehaving or disengaged to discuss the best ways to approach
the issue. The means that teachers are working together, rather than being left
alone to deal with a problem that they are struggling to manage. This paper could
hopefully be of help in addressing the behavior problems of Grade 5 pupils in
Rawis Elementary School.
V. Research Questions
This paper seeks to assess the discipline of her Grade 5 pupils and
specifically answer the following questions:
1. What are the common misbehaviors of the grade 5 pupils?
2. What controllable factors trigger these misbehaviors?
3. What intervention or project may be proposed to address the issue?
VI. Scope and Limitation
This research will only focus on determining the general or established
discipline of the grade 5 pupils the teacher researcher is handling. This will
identify the common misbehaviors of the pupils, as well as the controllable factors
on which the teacher can work to address the issue.
This study does not involve pupils from other grade levels. The behaviors of
the pupils outside the classroom are no longer a point for discussion in this
paper. Furthermore, the manipulation of identified controllable factors and the
extent of their effectiveness are no longer discussed in this study which only
aimed at identifying disciplinary problems as basis of intervention.
VII. Research Methodology
This basic research takes the descriptive observational design in
determining the prevailing discipline of the grade 5 pupils.
a. Sampling
This study involves all of the 32 Grade 5 pupils of the teacher researcher
composed of 14 boys and 18 girls.
b. Data Collection
The primary instrument for data collection is the observation checklist of
common misbehaviors of the pupils. The anecdotal records of the pupils will
also be used as secondary data gathering tool.
VIII. Discussion of Results and Recommendations
The following findings are revealed by the data gathering conducted by the
researcher:
Misbehaviors/Disciplinary Problems f r
Naglalaro o gumuguhit ng mga larawan sa papel imbes na
makinig sa guro. 28 3
Hindi gumagamit ng po at opo kapag kinakausap ang guro at
mga bisitang
nkatatanda. 19 6
Sumisigaw at nag-iingay sa klase. 18 7
Nakikipag-away sa kamag-aral. 2 13
Malimit lumabas ng silid-aralan. 26 5
Lumalabas sa klase ng hindi nagpapaalam sa guro. 1 15
Nangunguha ng pagkain at gamit ng kapwa mag-aaral. 2 13
Madalas nahuhuli sa klase. 17 9
Madalas lumiliban sa klase. 18 7
Nakikipagkwentuhan habang may klase. 32 1
Nagmumura kapag nagagalit o nakikipag-usap sa kamag-aral. 0 17
Sumasagot ng pabalang sa guro. 0 17
Naninira ng gamit ng kamag-aral at paaralan. 1 15
Nagsusulat sa mga upuan, mesa at dingding ng silid-aralan. 0 17
Nagsisinungaling kapag kinakausap. 0 17
Malikot sa klase at malimit na tumatayo o palakad-lakad habang
may leksiyon. 30 2
Hindi sumasagot sa mga gawaing ibinigay ng guro. 27 4
Nambubully ng kamag-aral. 13 11
Nagkakalat sa loob ng silid-aralan. 15 10
Tumatakas o umiiwas sa mga gawaing binigay ng guro. 3 12
Among the identified misbehaviors, rank 1 is Nakikipagkwentuhan habang
may klase. When the teacher-researcher is discussing the lessons, many pupils
tend to start conversations with their seatmates. Rank 2 is Malikot sa klase at
malimit na tumatayo o palakad-lakad habang may leksiyon. Many pupils display
naughtiness or playfulness in class even when the teacher is discussing the
lesson, and more frequently when they are given activities. These pupils show
signs of hyperactivity which at times disrupt the on-going activities. Rank 3 is
Naglalaro o gumuguhit ng mga larawan sa papel imbes na makinig sa guro.
Many pupils tend to doodle on their notebooks or play games in secret while the
teacher is talking in front.
On the other end, Nagmumura kapag nagagalit o nakikipag-usap sa kamag-
aral, Sumasagot ng pabalang sa guro, Nagsusulat sa mga upuan, mesa at
dingding ng silid-aralan, and Nagsisinungaling kapag kinakausap, whihc may be
oncsidered grave misbehaviors or misconducts, have not been observed among
the pupils.
Katipunan explained in his book that the purpose of imposing discipline in
schools is to make students realize that there is a norm of conduct in every
learning institution. Personal discipline in a democracy demands self-respect,
self-direction, and self-control. Students should be assisted in learning
experiences for social living. The problems of young children are rooted in the
home and their immediate environment.
With several factors contributory or influencing the pupils misbehaviors,
only two are within the control of the teacher-researcher; teaching strategies and
classroom structure. The researcher tried implementing various strategies in
teaching which somehow made them more interested in the lessons and
activities and lessened the frequency of the identified misbehaviors. The teacher-
researcher also tried changing the seating arrangement of the pupils. The
researcher do not have control of other factors like the class schedule and the
reasons why the pupils get late or commit absences from class.
Idaosos stressed in his work that the key to discipline is composed of
three fundamental factors: 1) consistency in the implementation of rules and
regulations and the disciplinary actions taken for violations; 2) fairness in the
administration of rules and consequences of breaking them; and 3) the
understanding of human nature which entails knowledge of both educational and
developmental psychology.
Based on the findings of the study, the researcher has initiated the
implementation of an intervention to reinforce discipline and encourage good
behavior among pupils. With this research as basis, the researcher will be
formally proposing the Project BREAD or Behavioral Reinforcement to
Encourage and Appreciate Discipline, which is a system of behavioral
modification and reinforcement gestures and activities that the teacher performs
to encourage good classroom behavior among pupils. The project also intensifies
home visits and dialogs with the pupils’ parents as an intervention to address
classroom misbehaviors, habitual tardiness and truancy.
Detera stated in her work that one strategy in classroom management is
the provision of instructional materials that can draw and sustain the interests of
learners. The management of a classroom includes control of physical conditions
as well as the materials of instruction. Some factors, though, are not within the
teacher’s control e.g. the size of the room and the location of the building, but an
ingenious teacher can make the dullest room in the building attractive, cozy and
comfortable, subject of course, to the facilities available to him and within his
capabilities, and the type of students to be housed.
IX. Financial Report
Particulars Amount
Reproduction of checklist 50.00
Total P50.00
Source: personal
X. References
Adeyemo, S. A. (2012). The relationship between effective classroom
management and students’ academic achievement. European Journal of
Educational Studies, 4, 367–381.) (p. 374).
Detera, Virginia., Classroom Climate as factor Correlate of Pupils’ Academic
Performance (Unpublished Dissertation, ACBSUI, 2003), p.22
Henry, Spencer. (2002). Practical Approach to Classroom Management and
Discipline. [Link]
[Link]
philippines/the-1987-constitution-of-the-republic-of-the-philippines-article-xiv/
Idaosos, Cesar., Discipline that Works, The Philippine Journal of education, Vol.
LXXX, No. 9, (February, 1997) p. 386
Katipunan, Rocio. Fundamentals of Guidance, Revised ed. (Manila: Rex
Bookstore: 2000)
Kelly, Melissa. (n.d.) Appropriate Consequences for Student Misbehavior
Kowalski. (2003). Retrieved from
[Link]
Logical Responses for Student Behavior Problems. Retrieved from
[Link]
No Child Left Behind (n.d.). Retrieved from [Link]
legislation
Order No. 40 s. 2012, known as the “Policy and Guidelines on Protecting
Children in School from Abuse, Violence, Exploitation, Discrimination, Bullying
and Other Forms of Abuse”
Rogel, Richelle I. (October, 2012) Academic Behavior and Performance of Third
Year Students of General Emilio Aguinaldo National High School, Division of
Cavite. Distance Education Open University System, Polytechnic University of
the Philippines
Save the Children. How to Research the Physical and Emotional Punishment of
Children. Bangkok: Southeast, East Asia and pacific Region, 2004.
School age behavior: what to expect. (n.d.) Retrieved from
[Link]
school-age-behaviour
Stoughton, E. H. (2007). “How will I get them to behave?”: Pre service teachers
reflect on classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1024–
1037.10.1016/[Link].2006.05.001[CrossRef], [Web of Science ®])
T. Good & Brophy, J. (2002). Looking in classrooms, 9th edition. Boston: Allyn &
Bacon, 2002
Teachers shouldn’t have to manage behaviour issues by themselves – schools
need to support them. (n.d.) Retrieved from [Link]
shouldnt-have-to-manage-behaviour-issues-by-themselves-schools-need-to-
support-them-76569