Advanced Surveying: Simple Curve Method
Uploaded by
Ryan JuanAdvanced Surveying: Simple Curve Method
Uploaded by
Ryan JuanCommon questions
Powered by AIThe middle ordinate (M) is significant as it represents the perpendicular distance from the curve's midpoint to the long chord, indicating how outward the curve bows. It is calculated using M = R (1 - cos(I/2)), making it dependent on the radius (R) and the half of the intersection angle (I). For the field work example with I = 55°, the middle ordinate is calculated as M = 20 (1 - cos(55°/2)) = 2.2598 m .
The intersection angle (I) is crucial for calculating the tangent distance (T). In the provided field work, the tangent distance is calculated using the formula T = R * tan(I/2), where R is the radius of the curve. For the given angle I = 55°, the tangent distance T is calculated as T = 20 * tan(55°/2), resulting in T = 10.4113 m .
The length of the curve (LC) is calculated using the formula LC = (I * R * π) / 180°, where I is the intersection angle and R is the radius. This formula relates the curve's length to its geometry through the central angle in radians, hence providing a direct measure of the path length. In the given field work example, with I = 55° and R = 20 m, LC is calculated as LC = (55° * 20 * π) / 180° = 19.1986 m .
Stationing, as used in the provided fieldwork, establishes reference points along a baseline, enabling precise calculations for distances and angles at specific points. This numeric marking system helps in systematically setting out and checking each segment of the curve, maintaining a high standard of accuracy required for complex geometries. Calculations such as those for the station PC (beginning of the curve), vertex, and station PT (end of the curve) use these definitive markers to ensure precision .
Selecting an appropriate chord length requires balance between field manageability, accuracy, and curve smoothness. A shorter chord length increases accuracy and matches the curve closely but requires more calculation steps and equipment placement. Conversely, a longer chord reduces these needs but risks oversimplifying the curve's shape, leading to potential errors. In the discussed work, a chord length of 3 m was adopted, which likely reflects a choice balancing these considerations, being practical for on-site execution while maintaining layout precision .
The 'long chord' (C) is vital for connecting the straight path between the curve's start and end points, simplifying field layout. It is calculated using C = 2R sin(I/2), allowing surveyors to reference a direct distance across the curve for setting out points efficiently. In the provided field work, with a radius (R) of 20 m and I = 55°, the long chord is calculated as C = 2 * 20 * sin(55°/2) = 18.4699 m .
Understanding both bearing and azimuth is crucial as they represent directions critical to placing and orienting survey lines. Bearings provide a quadrant-based direction relative to cardinal points, while azimuths offer a full-circle directional reference. In laying a simple curve, aligning the curve’s tangents using both bearings and azimuths ensures correct orientation and continuity with existing survey lines. For instance, in this field work, the backward tangent uses N 45° E (bearing) / 45° (azimuth) and the forward tangent is S 80° E (bearing) / 100° (azimuth).
The relationship between incremental chord lengths and central incremental angles is direct and proportional in curve calculation. Each chord length is carefully aligned with a corresponding incremental angle, ensuring that the curve segments accurately follow the geometric layout. The fieldwork data shows this with each chord (3 m) paired to a consistent central angle increment calculated precisely (8.6024°) to maintain the true geometric curvature across the incremental approach used .
The deflection angle is critical for positional accuracy as it determines each infinitesimal turning point along the curve. Errors in its measurement can propagate across successive angular increments, causing cumulative positional deviations. Accurate deflection angles ensure that each chord ends precisely on the theoretical curve path. In the discussed field work, deflection angles vary incrementally, necessitating precise angular measurements to maintain layout accuracy .
The calculations of the first and last deflection angles, using trigonometric functions like the inverse sine, directly influence the initial and final directional adjustments in curve placement. Accurate angles ensure that the points dictated by the incremental chords lay precisely on the curve path. Errors in these calculations could shift the entire curve placement, skewing the directional integrity. For instance, the first deflection angle d1 = 2sin-1(1.4113/40) = 4.0439° and last deflection angle d2 = 2sin-1(2.79/40) = 7.9993° demonstrate precise configuration to achieve accurate endpoint alignment .