0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views4 pages

Transfer of Property Under Section 5

The document discusses the topic of transfer of property under Section 5 of the Transfer of Property Act of 1882 in India. It provides background on the Act and how it governs the transfer of property between living persons. It analyzes key cases that have interpreted aspects of the Act related to what can be transferred, who is competent to transfer, and documentation requirements. The conclusion reiterates that the Act deals with transferring property between living individuals or entities, not by operation of law. It also discusses what is considered movable versus immovable property under the Act.

Uploaded by

muskaan chawla
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views4 pages

Transfer of Property Under Section 5

The document discusses the topic of transfer of property under Section 5 of the Transfer of Property Act of 1882 in India. It provides background on the Act and how it governs the transfer of property between living persons. It analyzes key cases that have interpreted aspects of the Act related to what can be transferred, who is competent to transfer, and documentation requirements. The conclusion reiterates that the Act deals with transferring property between living individuals or entities, not by operation of law. It also discusses what is considered movable versus immovable property under the Act.

Uploaded by

muskaan chawla
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

~SYMBIOSIS LAW SCHOOL, PUNE~

TOPIC – ‘TRANSFER OF PROPERTY’, ENVISAGED UNDER


SECTION 5 OF THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882

INTRODUCTION
Property as an entity, has a wide ambit which may incorporate anything which holds value
and which may possess the rights of ownership. Transfer of Property, governed under Section
5 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882; where act of transferring the property is pursued by a
living person to one or more persons or to himself or one or more other living persons which
may constitute a company, association or body of individuals but, may not include a
partnership firm, which was also highlighted in the case of, Shiromanigurudwara
Prabhandak Committee, Amritsar v. Sri Somnath Dass 1. Considering its extensive scope,
which offers the person who shall be deemed to be in possession of the property all the legal
rights but not his personal rights which may constitute to their status or personal condition,
this aspect is governed under Section 6 Clause (dd) 2, of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
The provisions stated under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 do not commonly adhere to
the testamentary succession, but it is applicable to the Hindu Succession Act, 1925; which
enforces any male or female who is in possession of a certain property can make a will or
testament to transfer the property or any other assets to anyone, and it shall be considered
valid and justifiable in the eyes of law, under the Hindu Law.

BACKGROUND

Transfer of Property Act, 1882; which was earlier governed by the English law, now has
another dimension and own individuality, where the transfer is made to a living and juristic
person, it should be through conveyance which can either be upheld in the present or in the
future. Making sure that nothing is transferred before the title. There are properties which
cannot be transferred which are mentioned under the Section 6 of the Act. People who can be
competent to contract, should be of sound mind and must have had attained the age of
maturity and the contract must not be void in the eyes of law. Considering that the transfer
made, must be in a considerable form; which must not be writing unless mandatorily, it must
not be based upon the creation of interests which might depend on the dispersal of interests

1
AIR 1938 Lahore 369
2
A right to future maintenance, in whatsoever manner arising, secured or determined, cannot be transferred.

1
~SYMBIOSIS LAW SCHOOL, PUNE~

after the lifetime of one or more persons from the date of transfer. Also. Considering that an
unborn child, cannot be held accountable for the transfer of property, in order to transfer the
interests of the property, the person must have had attained the age of maturity. Governing
such conditions under the Section 25 of the Act, if anything is forbidden by law, or is
unlawful, the transfer shall not be pursed and will be void from the moment if intended to be
created.

ANALYSIS

The term TRANSFER in the Section 5, does not obligate the person who conveys the
property necessarily be the owner of the property which is to be transferred. It has also been
said, in the following section that, the conveyance of the interest of the transferor for
example- in mortgage, or lease etc; there is no transfer of interest of the property. Also, the
section focuses upon all the properties held outside India or the territories and does not
exclude them from the equation of transfer. In the case of, Prethi Singh v. Ganesh3 , was
held that the clause of transfer, if affected, where the act comes into picture; then the location,
rights, liabilities of people, all are held in its adherence.

Transfer of Property is an act of conveyance, which projects the act of transferring the title of
the property, rendering the rights and interests from one living person to the other. The
pursued property could be to one or more living persons, to himself or one or more other
living persons, which may be transferred at the moment or in the future. In the case of, Lionel
Edwards Limited v. State of West Bengal4, it was proclaimed by the Honourable court,
that the entitlement of the property shall be conveyed from one living person to the other,
who by any chance has no right over the title otherwise.

It was held in the case of, A. Nadalwari v. N. Malvarayan 5, that if at all the transferee
showcases any interests in the property prior to it being conveyed to him then it cannot
profess the entitlement of transfer of property, because, the document of transfer shows the
change in ownership.

The property is a transferrable entity, which adheres to the general rules and regulations
which are addressed in the Section 6 of the Act; concerning it with, what may be transferred,
is based upon the maxim, ‘Alienation Rei Prefertur Juri Accrescendi’, which means that the
3
AIR 1951 All 462
4
AIR 1967 Cal 191
5
AIR 1936 Mad 918

2
~SYMBIOSIS LAW SCHOOL, PUNE~

law favours the alienation of the property than the accumulation. Any act done, which hinders
the right of the owner of the property, is condemned in the eyes of law.

With the variability of what to transfer also, comes the aspect of parties competent to transfer
which is governed under Section 7 of the Act, which necessarily has to suffice two
obligations i.e. the transferor must be competent to contract with other persons and the
transferor of the title must have the authority to transfer even if not the real owner. This has
been taken from the Section 11 of the Indian Contract Act, which categorizes the people who
can enter into in contract. The transferor must be a major, to be of sound mind, not be lunatic,
has not been debarred from entering into a contract.

The property must be transferred orally if not expressly mentioned to be in writing format,
governed under the Section 9 of the Transfer of Property Act, but writing shall be an
important quotient concerning the cases relating to; sale of immovable property valuing more
than rupees hundred6, sale or reversion of intangible things7, simple mortgage8, all other
mortgages valuing more than hundred or more 9, lease of immovable properties with term
exceeding more than a year10, exchange11, gift of immovable property12, transfer of actionable
claim13 etc. The Transfer of property Act, does not offer the transferee to showcase his
parting interest, such involvement shall be considered void; concerning it with, if the
transferee wishes to resell the property after acquiring it, he shall not be refrained from doing
so, as its very essence is based upon the principle of Public Policy, which allows the
transferee, free circulation and disposal of the property, this aspect has been governed under
the Section 10 of the Act. Thus, it can be said, that the property is a multi-dimensional
quotient, which offers the transferee the interests offered in its favour, and the transfer must
be direct, where it can enjoy the interests laid down in particular manner only, where the
person receiving the property, becomes the part of the contract and legal obligations under
the Transfer of Property act, is bestowed upon him.

6
Governed under Section 54 of the Transfer of Properties Act, 1882
7
Governed under Section 54 of the Transfer of Properties Act, 1882
8
Governed under Section 59 of the Transfer of Properties Act, 1882
9
Governed under Section 59 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882
10
Governed under Section 107 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882
11
Provided under Section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882
12
Provided under Section 123 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882
13
Provided under Section 130 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882

3
~SYMBIOSIS LAW SCHOOL, PUNE~

CONCLUSION

The Transfer of Property Act, came into existence in the year 1882, which was earlier
governed by the rule of English Law and equity. The Preamble of the act, lays down the
objectives for effective legislation considering that the scope of the act is limited, as the
transfer applies only by the act of parties and not by the operation of law. It deals with the
aspect of Inter Vivos which means that the act of transfer of property to be between two
living person which may include the immovable as well as the movable property. To further
profess the importance of a living person, in the case of, Har Narain v. Bank of Upper
India14, threw light on the fact that court is not a juristic person neither is it a living person,
and thus, order for sale is not the transfer of property which falls within the ambit of this act.
According to the Section 3, of the act the immovable property; considerably does not include
the standing timber, the crops, or the grass. Taking the case of the trees, if at all there is an
intent to reap out certain benefits or nutrients from the soil, enjoying its fruits then it shall be
considered as an immovable property, keeping it intact and not making any alternations. But,
if the intention is such, to cut down the tree sooner or later for any industrial use or for any
other purpose, then it shall be considered as a movable property; this distinction was
highlighted in the case of, Shantabai v. State of Bombay 15. Further to enhance the array of
distinction between movable or immovable property, pertains to the fact that anything which
cannot change its place, without any alterations is said to be immovable; highlighted in the
case of, Sukry Kurdepa v. Goondakull 16. The transfer of the property may take place either
on immediate basis or in near future, which shall be effective from the date mentioned in the
sale deed, which according to Section 5, in the case of, Jugalkishore v. Raw Cotton Co.17,
the clause of transfer in present or future; exempts the word, ‘property’ and qualifies,
‘convey’.

14
AIR 1938 Oudh 84
15
AIR 1958 SC 532
16
(1872) 6 Mad. H.C. 71
17
(1955) SCR 1369

Common questions

Powered by AI

The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 defines 'transfer of property' as an act by which a living person conveys property to one or more other living persons, or to himself, with the inclusion of juridical persons, like corporations or associations, but not including partnership firms . The act recognizes transfers through conveyances that can be either inter vivos or testamentary. It stipulates that the transfer of interest does not include merely transferring a mortgage or lease without transferring ownership interest . Furthermore, the act is governed by the principle of 'Alienation Rei Prefertur Juri Accrescendi,' meaning it favors alienation of property over accumulation and outlines specific conditions and legal formalities, such as writing requirements for the sale of immovable property exceeding a certain value .

For a valid property transfer under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, several conditions must be met: the transferor must be competent to contract, meaning they must be of sound mind and majority age . The property must be transferable, which excludes certain properties under Section 6. Transfers must satisfy formal documentation requirements particularly for immovable properties valued over a certain amount . Furthermore, the transfer must not contravene any law, and cannot transfer rights that are purely personal or dependent on possession conditions forbidden by law .

Under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, a person acting as a transferor must be legally competent, meaning they need to meet certain criteria: being of sound mind, having attained the age of majority, and not being barred from contracting due to factors such as insanity or legal prohibition . Moreover, under Section 7, a transferor must have the authority to transfer the property title, even if not the real owner, allowing transactions where the person does not own the title . These competencies ensure that transactions are conducted transparently and lawfully, protecting all parties involved. Additionally, principles are borrowed from the Indian Contract Act, which categorizes who may enter contracts .

The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 imposes restrictions on transferring property interests that depend on personal conditions or are future-based, such as future maintenance rights and interests contingent upon the life of another person . Section 6 clarifies non-transferable properties, and areas where transfers could conflict with the law, such as future conditions forbidden by law, rendering them void . Furthermore, the act prohibits transferees from showcasing an interest before transfer completion, preserving the original owner’s rights until the formal transfer is effectuated . These restrictions aim to maintain clarity in property rights assignments and protect rightful ownership and transfer legality.

Ensuring a property is transferable under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, is critical for legal validity and enforceability. It addresses the notion of clear titles and the transfer of rights from the transferor to the transferee while safeguarding against legal disputes . Section 6 outlines non-transferable properties, thereby preventing unauthorized and illegal transactions. The act mandates that all transfers comply with statutory rules, supporting legitimate and unambiguous transfers that protect parties' legal positions and facilitate market stability . Failure to adhere to these principles can lead to void contracts, infringement claims, and financial losses, emphasizing the importance of ensuring transferability in property law.

The principle of 'Alienation Rei Prefertur Juri Accrescendi,' applied under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, signifies that law favors the alienation of property over its accumulation . This principle underpins the act's emphasis on facilitating smooth transfers and avoiding unnecessary encumbrances that could stifle property circulation. It reflects the act's intent to promote clarity and simplicity in property transactions by prioritizing current and actionable transfers while discouraging indefinite retention. By doing so, the act helps ensure property use aligns with productive and practical ends, fostering economic stability and accessibility .

The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 delineates distinct treatment for immovable and movable properties. According to Section 3, immovable property does not include standing timber, growing crops, or grass . However, if trees are intended to remain for deriving benefits from the soil, enjoying their fruits, they are considered immovable properties, as affirmed in the case of Shantabai v. State of Bombay . Conversely, trees intended for being cut down for use are treated as movable property. This distinction underscores the importance of intent and utilization purpose when categorizing properties under the act .

Although the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 primarily addresses non-testamentary property transfers, it acknowledges testamentary succession laws, particularly in relation to Hindu Succession . Under Hindu law, individuals can make wills to dictate property and asset transfers following their demise. The Hindu Succession Act, 1925, enables testators to transfer property through wills, recognized as valid and enforceable. Thus, testamentary regulations integrate with property law provisions to ensure fair distribution and transfer intentions are respected within legal frameworks .

The concept of 'Inter Vivos' plays a crucial role in the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, as it defines property transfers between living persons, encompassing both movable and immovable property . This concept is pivotal as the act only applies to transfers enacted by the act of parties, not by operation of law. The act clarifies that only living persons, which include individuals and juristic persons like corporations, can partake in property transfers. Legal proceedings have applied this by requiring a transfer of property to occur through direct conveyance from one living entity to another, excluding orders from entities such as courts that are not considered juristic persons .

The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 specifies various formal requirements for property transfers based on property types. For instance, Section 9 allows oral transfers unless writing is mandated, as with immovable property sales exceeding a certain value, reversion of intangible things, or mortgage-related agreements . Additionally, specific sections govern sales of immovable properties valued over a hundred rupees, applying measures like executed documents, as outlined in Sections 54 and 59. Leases exceeding a year's term, exchanges, and gifts of immovable property also require written documentation under pertinent sections like 107, 108, and 123 .

You might also like