Ajit Singh ------ Classical Cryptography
Introduction to Cryptography
cryptography is the study of
secret (crypto-) writing (-graphy)
concerned with developing algorithms which may be used to:
conceal the context of some message from all except the sender and recipient (privacy or secrecy),
and/or
verify the correctness of a message to the recipient (authentication)
form the basis of many technological solutions to computer and communications security problems
for a good overview paper see:
W Diffie, M E Hellman, "Privacy and Authentication: An Introduction to Cryptography", in Proc. IEEE, Vol
67(3) Mar 1979, pp 397-427
Basic Concepts
cryptography
the art or science encompassing the principles and methods of transforming an intelligible message into one
that is unintelligible, and then retransforming that message back to its original form
plaintext
the original intelligible message
ciphertext
the transformed message
cipher
an algorithm for transforming an intelligible message into one that is unintelligible by transposition and/or
substitution methods
key
1/20
some critical information used by the cipher, known only to the sender & receiver
encipher (encode)
the process of converting plaintext to ciphertext using a cipher and a key
decipher (decode)
the process of converting ciphertext back into plaintext using a cipher and a key
cryptanalysis
the study of principles and methods of transforming an unintelligible message back into an intelligible
message without knowledge of the key. Also called codebreaking
cryptology
both cryptography and cryptanalysis
code
an algorithm for transforming an intelligible message into an unintelligible one using a code-book
Concepts
Encryption C = E_(K)(P)
Decryption P = E_(K)^(-1)(C)
E_(K) is chosen from a family of transformations known as a cryptographic system.
The parameter that selects the individual transformation is called the key K, selected from a keyspace K
More formally a cryptographic system is a single parameter family of invertible transformations
E_(K) ; K in K : P -> C
with the inverse algorithm E_(K)^(-1) ; K in K : C -> P
such that the inverse is unique
Usually assume the cryptographic system is public, and only the key is secret information
Private-Key Encryption Algorithms
a private-key (or secret-key, or single-key) encryption algorithm is one where the sender and the recipient
share a common, or closely related, key
all traditional encryption algorithms are private-key
overview of a private-key encryption system and attacker
2/20
Classical Cryptography
Cryptanalytic Attacks
have several different types of attacks
ciphertext only
only have access to some enciphered messages
use statistical attacks only
known plaintext
know (or strongly suspect) some plaintext-ciphertext pairs
use this knowledge in attacking cipher
chosen plaintext
can select plaintext and obtain corresponding ciphertext
use knowledge of algorithm structure in attack
chosen plaintext-ciphertext
can select plaintext and obtain corresponding ciphertext, or select ciphertext and obtain plaintext
allows further knowledge of algorithm structure to be used
Unconditional and Computational Security
two fundamentally different ways ciphers may be secure
unconditional security
- no matter how much computer power is available, the cipher cannot be broken
computational security
- given limited computing resources (eg time needed for calculations is greater than age of universe),
the cipher cannot be broken
3/20
A Brief History of Cryptography
Ancient Ciphers
have a history of at least 4000 years
ancient Egyptians enciphered some of their hieroglyphic writing on monuments
ancient Hebrews enciphered certain words in the scriptures
2000 years ago Julius Ceasar used a simple substitution cipher, now known as the Caesar cipher
Roger Bacon described several methods in 1200s
Geoffrey Chaucer included several ciphers in his works
Leon Alberti devised a cipher wheel, and described the principles of frequency analysis in the 1460s
Blaise de Vigenère published a book on cryptology in 1585, & described the polyalphabetic substitution
cipher
increasing use, esp in diplomacy & war over centuries
Machine Ciphers
Jefferson cylinder, developed in 1790s, comprised 36 disks, each with a random alphabet, order of
disks was key, message was set, then another row became cipher
Wheatstone disc, originally invented by Wadsworth in 1817, but developed by Wheatstone in 1860's,
comprised two concentric wheels used to generate a polyalphabetic cipher
4/20
Enigma Rotor machine, one of a very important class of cipher machines, heavily used during 2nd world
war, comprised a series of rotor wheels with internal cross-connections, providing a substitution using a
continuosly changing alphabet
5/20
Classical Cryptographic Techniques
have two basic components of classical ciphers: substitution and transposition
in substitution ciphers letters are replaced by other letters
in transposition ciphers the letters are arranged in a different order
these ciphers may be:
monoalphabetic - only one substitution/ transposition is used, or
polyalphabetic - where several substitutions/ transpositions are used
several such ciphers may be concatentated together to form a product cipher
Caesar Cipher - a monoalphabetic cipher
replace each letter of message by a letter a fixed distance away eg use the 3rd letter on
reputedly used by Julius Caesar
eg.
L FDPH L VDZ L FRQTXHUHG
I CAME I SAW I CONQUERED
6/20
9/1/2010 Classical Cryptography
ie mapping is
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
DEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZABC
can describe this cipher as:
Encryption E_(k) : i -> i + k mod 26
Decryption D_(k) : i -> i - k mod 26
Cryptanalysis of the Caesar Cipher
only have 26 possible ciphers
could simply try each in turn - exhaustive key search
GDUCUGQFRMPCNJYACJCRRCPQ
HEVDVHRGSNQDOKZBDKDSSDQR
Plain - IFWEWISHTOREPLACELETTERS
JGXFXJTIUPSFQMBDFMFUUFST
KHYGYKUJVQTGRNCEGNGVVGTU
Cipher - LIZHZLVKWRUHSODFHOHWWHUV
MJAIAMWLXSVITPEGIPIXXIVW
also can use letter frequency analysis
Single Letter Double Letter Triple Letter
E TH THE
T HE AND
R IN TIO
N ER ATI
I RE FOR
O ON THA
A AN TER
S EN RES
Character Frequencies
in most languages letters are not equally common
in English e is by far the most common letter
have tables of single double & triple letter frequencies
these are different for different languages (see Appendix A in Seberry & Pieprzyk)
7/20
use these tables to compare with letter frequencies in ciphertext, since a monoalphabetic substitution does
not change relative letter frequencies
[1]
do need a moderate amount of ciphertext (100+ letters)
Modular Arithmetic monoalphabetic cipher
more generally could use a more complex equation to calculate the ciphertext letter for each plaintext letter
E_(a b) : i ->a.i + b mod 26
nb a must not divide 26 (ie gcd(a,26) = 1)
otherwise cipher is not reversible eg a=2
and a=0, b=1, c=2 ... , y=24, z=25
eg E_(5 7) : i ->5.i + 7 mod 26
Cryptanalysis:
use letter frequency counts to guess a couple of possible letter mappings
nb frequency pattern not produced just by a shift
use these mappings to solve 2 simultaneous equations to derive above parameters
Example - Sinkov pp 34-35
8/20
Mixed Alphabets
most generally we could use an arbitrary mixed (jumbled) alphabet
each plaintext letter is given a different random ciphertext letter, hence key is 26 letters long
Plain: ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
Cipher: DKVQFIBJWPESCXHTMYAUOLRGZN
Plaintext: IFWEWISHTOREPLACELETTERS
Ciphertext: WIRFRWAJUHYFTSDVFSFUUFYA
now have a total of 26! ^(~) 4 ^(x) 10^(26) keys
with so many keys, might think this is secure
!!!WRONG!!!
problem is not the number of keys, rather:
1) there is lots of statistical information in message
2) can solve the problem piece by piece
(ie can get key nearly right, and nearly get message)
(near enough MUST NOT be good enough!)
Cryptanalysis
use frequency counts to guess letter by letter
also have frequencies for digraphs & trigraphs
General Monoalphabetic
special form of mixed alphabet
use key as follows:
write key (with repeated letters deleted)
then write all remaining letters in columns underneath
then read off by columns to get ciphertext equivalents
Example Seberry p66
STARW
BCDEF
GHIJK
LMNOP
QUVXY
Z
Plain: ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
Cipher: SBGLQZTCHMUADINVREJOXWFKPY
Plaintext: I KNOW ONLY THAT I KNOW NOTHING
9/20
Classical Cryptography
Ciphertext: H UINF NIAP OCSO H UINF INOCHIT
Polyalphabetic Substitution
in general use more than one substitution alphabet
makes cryptanalysis harder since have more alphabets to guess
and because flattens frequency distribution
(since same plaintext letter gets replaced by several ciphertext letter, depending on which alphabet is used)
Vigenère Cipher
basically multiple caesar ciphers
key is multiple letters long K = k_(1) k_(2) ... k_(d)
ith letter specifies ith alphabet to use
use each alphabet in turn, repeating from start after d letters in message
Plaintext THISPROCESSCANALSOBEEXPRESSED
Keyword CIPHERCIPHERCIPHERCIPHERCIPHE
Plaintext VPXZTIQKTZWTCVPSWFDMTETIGAHLH
can use a Saint-Cyr Slide for easier encryption
based on a Vigenère Tableau
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
A ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
B BCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZA
C CDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZAB
D DEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZABC
E EFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZABCD
F FGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZABCDE
G GHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZABCDEF
H HIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZABCDEFG
I IJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZABCDEFGH
J JKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZABCDEFGHI
K KLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZABCDEFGHIJ
L LMNOPQRSTUVWXYZABCDEFGHIJK
M MNOPQRSTUVWXYZABCDEFGHIJKL
N NOPQRSTUVWXYZABCDEFGHIJKLM
O OPQRSTUVWXYZABCDEFGHIJKLMN
P PQRSTUVWXYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNO
Q QRSTUVWXYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP
R RSTUVWXYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQ
S STUVWXYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQR
T TUVWXYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRS
10/20
Classical Cryptography
V
U VWXYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTU
UVWXYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRST
W WXYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUV
X XYZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVW
Y YZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWX
Z ZABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXY
can describe this cipher as:
given K = k_(1) k_(2) ... k_(d)
then f_(i) (a) = a + k_(i) (mod n)
Beauford Cipher
similar to Vigenère but with alphabet written backwards
can be descibed by
given K = k_(1) k_(2) ... k_(d)
then f_(i) (a) = (k_(i) - a) (mod n)
and its inverse is
f_(i) ^(-1)(a) = (k_(i) - c) (mod n)
Example - Seberry p71
Key = d
Plain: ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
Cipher: DCBAZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFE
Variant-Beauford Cipher
just the inverse of the Vigenère (decrypts it)
given K = k_(1) k_(2) ... k_(d)
then f_(i) (a) = a - k_(i) (mod n)
Language Redundancy & Unicity Distance
human languages are highly redundant
eg th lrd s m shphrd shll nt wnt
Claude Shannon derived several important results about the information content of languages in 1949
entropy of a message H(X) is related to the number of bits of information needed to encode a message X
[2]
cannot exceed log_(2)n bits for n possible messages
the rate of langauge for messages of length k denotes the average number of bits in each character
11/20
Classical Cryptography
D = F(H(M),k)
rate of English is about 3.2 bits/letter
distinguish information context and redundancy
Shannon defined the unicity distance of a cipher to give a quantatative measure of:
the security of a cipher (must not be too small)
the amount of ciphertext N needed to break it
N = F(H(K),D)
where H(K) is entropy (amount of info) of the key,
and is D the rate of the language used (eg 3.2)
for polynomial based monoalphabetic substitution ciphers have:
N = F(H(K),D) = F(log_(2)26,3.2) = 1.5
hence only need 2 letters to break
for general monoalphabetic substitution ciphers have
N = F(H(K),D) = F(log_(2)n!,D) = F(log_(2)26!,3.2) = F(26 log_(2)F(26,e),3.2) = 27.6
hence only need 27 or 28 letters to break
for polyalphabetic substitution ciphers, if have s possible keys for each simple subs, and d keys used, then
N = F(H(K),D) = F(log_(2)s^(d),D) = F(d log_(2)26,3.2) = 1.5d
hence need 1.5 times the number of separate substitutions used letters to break the cipher
but first need to determine just how many alphabets were used
Kasiski method
index of coincidence
Kasiski Method
use repetitions in ciphertext to give clues as to period, looking for same plaintext an exact period apart,
leading to same ciphertext
Example - Seberry p71
Plaintext: TOBEORNOTTOBE
Key: NOWNOWNOWNOWN
Ciphertext: GCXRCNACPGCXR
Since repeats are 9 chars apart, guess period is 3 or 9.
12/20
Classical Cryptography
Index of Coincidence
Index of Coincidence (IC) was introduced in 1920s by William Friedman
measures variation of frequencies of letters in ciphertext
period = 1 => simple subs => variation is high, IC high
period > 1 => poly subs => variation is reduced, IC low
see Seberry Table 3.2 p72 and Table 3.3 p74
d IC
1 0.0660
2 0.0520
3 0.0473
4 0.0450
5 0.0436
6 0.0427
7 0.0420
8 0.0415
9 0.0411
10 0.0408
11 0.0405
12 0.0403
13 0.0402
14 0.0400
15 0.0399
... ...
Inf 0.0380
Table 3.3 - Period and IC for English
first define a measure of roughness (MR) giving variation of frequencies of individual characters relative
to a uniform distribution
MR = Isu(i=o,n-1,(p_(i) - F(1,n))^(2))
where p_(i) is probability an arbitrary character in ciphertext is the ith character a_(i) in the alphabet
Isu(i=o,n-1,p_(i)) = 1
for English letters can derive
MR = Isu(i=o,n-1,p_(i)^(2)) - 0.038
or
MR + 0.038 = Isu(i=o,n-1,p_(i)^(2))
is prob two arbitrary letters in ciphertext are the same
can compute MR for plaintext using characteristic letter frequencies
eg MR for English is 0.028 (0.066 - 0.038)
13/20
can also compute MR for a flat distribution as 0
since probabilities and period are unknown, cannot compute MR, however can estimate from ciphertext
now the number of pairs of letters that can be chosen from ciphertext of length N is
Bbc[(S(N,2)) = F(1,2) N (N-1)
if F_(i) is the freq of the ith letter of English in the ciphertext, then the number of pairs containing just the
ith letter is
F(F_(i)(F_(i)-1),2) and Isu(i=o,n-1,F_(i)) = 1
now define the Index of Coincidence (IC) as the prob that two letters at random from the ciphertext are
indeed the same
IC = Isu(i=o,n-1,F(F_(i)(F_(i)-1),N(N-1)))
and use the IC estimate in
MR + 0.038 = IC
since usually use IC in crypto work, expect that
0.038 < IC < 0.066
for a cipher of period d the expected value of the IC is
Exp(IC) = F(1,d) F(N-d,N-1)(0.066) + Bbc[(S(d-1,d))F(N,N-1)(0.038)
and we can use these values to estimate d from the ciphertext
Example program to compute IC - Seberry Fig3.4 p74
Solving Polyalphabetic Ciphers
use Kasiski method & IC to estimate period d
then separate ciphertext into d sections, and solve each as a monoalphabetic cipher
Example - Seberry pp73-77
Krypto program
this is a program to help solve simple substitution and transposition ciphers
invoke using
krypto [file]
has the following commands available
Command Meaning
? this message.
! execute a shell command.
14/20
f [<seqlen> [n]] print [the n most] frequent strings of length seqlen.
g [<d> <p>] print the frequency distribution graph of letters.
i [<p>] calculate the index of coincidence of the text.
l [<b> <B>] list only the modified string. [b=blklength, B=blks/line]
p print current code.
q exit.
s <ch1> <ch2> substitute ch2 for ch1.
S [-] -[gvbB] {keys} Perform the substitution specified by the key.
T [-] <perm>|key Transpose text by perm or keyword. e.g. T 4,5,2,3,1
t <n> [/regexp] look for transpositions of period n; [print only /regexp].
B [-] <perm>|key apply the specifed rectangular encryption to the text.
b <n> [/regexp] look for block decryptions of size n; [print only
/regexp].
u undo previous modification.
z reset the code to its initial state.
r <file> enter code from file.
w <file> write code to file.
e edit code.
see man entry for more details
Transposition Ciphers
transposition or permutation ciphers hide the message contents by rearranging the order of the letters
Scytale cipher
an early Greek transposition cipher
a strip of paper was wound round a staff
message written along staff in rows, then paper removed
leaving a strip of seemingly random letters
not very secure as key was width of paper & staff
For information on lots of simple substitution and permutation ciphers see:
A. Sinkov "Elementary Cryptanalysis", New Mathematical Library, Random House, 1968* other simple
transposition ciphers include:
Reverse cipher
write the message backwards
15/20
Plain: I CAME I SAW I CONQUERED
Cipher: DEREU QNOCI WASIE MACI
Rail Fence cipher
write message with letters on alternate rows
read off cipher row by row
Plain: I A E S W C N U R D
C M I A I O Q E E
Cipher: IAESW CNURD CMIAI OQEE
Geometric Figure
write message following one pattern and read out with another
Row Transposition ciphers
in general write message in a number of columns and then use some rule to read off from these columns
key could be a series of number being the order to: read off the cipher; or write in the plaintext
Plain: THESIMPLESTPOSSIBLETRANSPOSITIONSXX
Key (R): 2 5 4 1 3
Key (W): 4 1 5 3 2
T H E S I S T I E H
M P L E S E M S L P
T P O S S S T S O P
I B L E T E I T L B
R A N S P S R P N A
O S I T I T O I I S
O N S X X X O X S N
Cipher: STIEH EMSLP STSOP EITLB SRPNA TOIIS XOXSN
Example - Davies p26 Fig 2.14
or can use a word, with letter order giving sequence: to write in the plaintext; or read off the cipher
Plain: ACONVENIENTWAYTOEXPRESSTHEPERMUTATION
Key (W): C O M P U T E R
Key (W): 1 4 3 5 8 7 2 6
16/20
A N O V I N C E
E W T A O T N Y
H E P R T U E M
A O I N Z Z T Z
Cipher: ANOVI NCEEW TAOTN YHEPR TUEMA OINZZ TZ
Example - Davies p26 Fig 2.15
key idea for row transposition ciphers is that message is in groups that have the letters reordered in each
Exercise using key sorcery (to read out) encipher:
Key(R): sorcery => 6 3 4 1 2 5 7
laser beams can be modulated to carry more intelligence than radio waves
gives
erasb lecam snabd umole atoed ctamo ryrre elntl iicee ntgha dnria oesav w
decryption consists of:
writing the message out in columns
reading off the message by reordering columns
(use T command in krypto, uses read out keys)
hint - its not a good idea to leave message in groups matching the size of your key!!!
Cryptanalysis of Row Transposition ciphers
a frequency count will show a normal language profile
hence know have letters rearranged
basic idea is to guess period, then look at all possible permutations in period, and search for common
patterns (eg t command in krypto)
use lists of common pairs & triples & other features
Example - Seberry p67-8 [3]
to determine the complexity of this cipher, we can calculate its unicity distance
given blocks of period d, there are d! keys, hence
N = F(H(K),D) = F(log_(2)d!,D) = F(d log_(2)(d/e),3.2)
Seberry Table 3.1 p69
Block (Columnar) Transposition ciphers
another group of ciphers are block (columnar) transposition ciphers where the message is written in
rows, but read off by columns in order given by key (use B command in krypto)
for ease of recovery may insist matrix is filled
17/20
Key(R): s o r c e r y s o r c e r y
Key(R): 6 3 4 1 2 5 7 6 3 4 1 2 5 7
l a s e r b e l a s e r b e
a m s c a n b a m s c a n b
e m o d u l a e m o d u l a
t e d t o c a t e d t o c a
r r y m o r e r r y m o r e
i n t e l l i i n t e l l i
g e n c e t h g e n c e t h
a n r a d i o a n r a d i o
w a v e s w a v e s q r
giving ciphertext (by reading off cols 4, 5, 2, 3, 6, 1, 7)
ecdtm ecaer auool edsam merne nasso dytnr vbnlc rltiq laetr igawe baaei hor
decryption consists of:
calculating how many rows there are (by dividing message length by key length)
then write out message down columns in order given by key
Example - Sinkov p148
exercise - Sinkov p148 #74
Sinkov p148
Cryptanalysis of Block Transposition ciphers
again know must be a transposition, and guess is perhaps a block transposition
guess size of matrix by looking at factors of message length, and write out by columns
then look for ways of reordering pairs of columns to give common pairs or triples (very much trial & error)
(nb use b command in krypto to try possibilities)
Example - Sinkov p 149-151
Nihilist ciphers
a more complex transposition cipher using both row and column transpositions is the nihilist cipher
write message in rows in order controlled by the key (as for a row cipher)
then read off by rows, but in order controlled by the key, this time written down the side
uses a period of size the square of the key length
Plaintext: NOWISTHETIMEFORALLGOODMEN
Key (W): L E M O N
2 1 3 5 4
L 2 O N W S I
E 1 H T E I T
18/20
Classical Cryptography
M 3 E M F R O
0 5 L A L O G
N 4 D O M N E
Nihilist Cipher: HTEIT ONWSI EMFRO DOMNE LALOG
Diagonal Cipher: ONHET WSEML DAFII TRLOM OOGNE
Example - Davis Fig2.16 p27
attacking this cipher depends on column and row rearrangement, with much trial and error
for more complexity can vary readout algorithm
diagonal cipher reads out on fwd diag (/) in alternate directions (up diag, down diag etc), ie a zig-
zag read out
Product ciphers
can see that in general ciphers based on just substitutions or just transpositions are not secure
what about using several ciphers in order
two substitutions are really only one more complex substitution
two transpositions are really only one more complex transposition
but a substitution followed by a transposition makes a new much harder cipher
product ciphers consist substitution-transposition combinations chained together
in general are far too hard to do by hand, however one famous product cipher, the 'ADFGVX' cipher was
used in WW1 (see Kahn pp339-350)
instead there use had to wait for the invention of the cipher machine, particularly the rotor machines (eg
Enigma, Hagalin) mentioned briefly earlier
ADFGVX Product Cipher
named since only letters ADFGVX are used
chosen since have very distinct morse codes
uses a fixed substitution table to map each plaintext letter to a letter pair (row-col index)
then uses a keyed block transposition
Substitution Table
\\ A D F G V X
A K Z W R 1 F
D 9 B 6 C L 5
F Q 7 J P G X
G E V Y 3 A N
V 8 O D H 0 2
X U 4 I S T M
Plaintext: PRODUCTCIPHERS
19/20
Intermediate Text:
FG AG VD VF XA DG XV
DG XF FG VG GA AG XG
Keyed Block Columnlar Transposition Matrix
D E U T S C H Key
2 3 7 6 5 1 4 Sorted Order
F G A G V D V
F X A D G X V
D G X F F G V
G G A A G X G
Ciphertext: DXGX FFDG GXGG VVVG VGFG CDFA AAXA
[Link]/…/[Link] 20/20