Research Methodology Overview
Uploaded by
RizkyArditaPelloResearch Methodology Overview
Uploaded by
RizkyArditaPelloCommon questions
Powered by AIResearch should be valid, meaning the information collected should be correct and verifiable by the researcher, which ensures the research is ethical . Additionally, research should be controlled, rigorous, systematic, and empirical to maintain a reliable relation between variables and ensure that conclusions are based on hard evidence from observations and real-life experiences .
Mixed methods research integrates both quantitative and qualitative data collection, analysis, and interpretation within a single or series of studies, providing a comprehensive understanding of a research problem . This differs from purely quantitative research, which focuses on numeric and unchanging data, and purely qualitative research, which eschews measurement for more interpretive analysis .
Research questions can emerge from the literature review process by identifying suggestions for unanswered questions, decisions to replicate or challenge existing work, or recognizing a niche in the literature where certain aspects have not been explored . Also, questions can arise from identifying recent events or developments that shed light on particular concepts or linguistic phenomena .
Controlled research is vital because it ensures that the relationship between variables is accurately assessed, allowing for precise, valid conclusions . Without control, external or internal influences might skew results, leading to unreliable conclusions and reducing the study's overall credibility .
Researchers should consider the nature of the research question and the type and depth of understanding required. An objective stance, typical of quantitative methods, may be suited for studies requiring numerical precision and hypothesis testing, while qualitative approaches, focusing on nuanced, in-depth understanding, suit contexts where complex social interactions or phenomena need exploration . They must weigh the scientific rigor associated with each approach against the richness of data they seek .
Empirical evidence, emphasizing observations and real-life experiences, is crucial in social sciences because it grounds theories and findings in tangible, observable phenomena, enhancing the validity and reliability of results . This approach avoids speculation, ensuring that conclusions drawn are robust and applicable to real-world contexts, and addressing the inherently variable nature of social phenomena .
Interview techniques allow researchers to gather necessary language data directly from informants, providing rich qualitative data . Observation techniques enable researchers to gather data without influencing the object under study, capturing authentic language activities within a community, often supplemented by recording for later analysis .
Research serves as the foundation of knowledge by establishing guidelines and norms for solving diverse problems, ensuring continuous growth within fields of study . It bridges gaps between existing knowledge and emerging findings by providing empirically-tested insights that guide both academic inquiry and practical applications .
Systematic research involves evaluating or obtaining necessary information through a series of well-defined and interlinked steps, ensuring a cohesive and thorough research design . This approach minimizes bias and enhances the accuracy and validity of the study findings by ensuring all relevant variables and processes are consistently addressed and controlled .
Quantitative methods focus on numbers, logic, and an objective stance, dealing largely with numeric data and convergent reasoning . In contrast, qualitative methods do not involve measurement or statistics and often face criticism as less scientific despite their focus on understanding phenomena through non-numeric data and a more subjective lens .