0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views8 pages

Instructor Guide for Design Programme

The document provides guidance for instructors facilitating a three-phase instructional design programme. It outlines the course description and sequence, instructor qualifications, managing teaching assistants, pre-planning activities, management activities during the programme, the major project component, and post-programme activities. The goal is to equip lecturers with skills to develop teaching and learning materials using an instructional design process and template.

Uploaded by

Dreana Marshall
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views8 pages

Instructor Guide for Design Programme

The document provides guidance for instructors facilitating a three-phase instructional design programme. It outlines the course description and sequence, instructor qualifications, managing teaching assistants, pre-planning activities, management activities during the programme, the major project component, and post-programme activities. The goal is to equip lecturers with skills to develop teaching and learning materials using an instructional design process and template.

Uploaded by

Dreana Marshall
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

INSTRUCTOR GUIDE

INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
PROGRAMME
VERSION 1.0
Prepared by:
Dr. Roger Powley
Version 1.0
COURSE DESCRIPTION

OVERVIEW
The Instructional Design Programme is designed for lecturers at Technical/
Vocational Institutions and Institutions of Higher Learner who want to learn how to
develop teaching and/or learning materials in accordance with the Instructional
Design Process (ISD), using the new COL Instructional Design Template and Tool
(IDT). The programme will address the issues and challenges of materials
development in introducing more flexible and blended approaches to the delivery
of instruction using a variety of different media.

Details of the three phased programme is described in the Study Guide issued to
students and supporting faculty/teaching assistants. You should read this document
before proceeding.

COURSE DEVELOPER /AUTHOR


The Instructional Design Programme and supporting Instructional Design Tool (IDT)
was designed by Dr. Roger Powley under contract to the Commonwealth of
Learning. The entire programme was piloted in two locations with multiple
institutions. The results of the pilot were incorporated into this final package of
learning materials.

For information about the design decisions or to seek clarification about course
content and exercises please contact Dr. Powley (in Victoria, British Columbia) by
email at [Link]@[Link] or by phone at (250) 483-5594.

COURSE SEQUENCE
As described in the Study Guide there are three phases to the Instructional Design
Programme. The assigned Instructor should facilitate all three phases to ensure
continuity of presentation and feedback. The time to complete each phase must be
identified by the hosting institution. Some suggested timings include:

Phase 1 – Pre-Workshop Activities. Learners should be provided access to the


Instructional Design Tool and the Study Guide at least two to four weeks before the
workshop is conducted.

Phase 2 – Workshop. The workshop requires five full days of instruction (6 ½ hours
a day). The instructor should consider the following delivery options based on the
availability of the learners:

 Teach the workshop over five full instructional days.


2
 Break the workshop into ten half day sessions. This allows the learners
more time to work on their projects while still having daily access to the
instructor.
 Teach the workshop one day a week for five weeks. This is the least
favoured option since some of the students may miss a session or two and
become engaged in their day to day work routines. This would allow the
learners to finish much of their major project while having access to the
instructor. It may require some additional time for review at the beginning
of each day.

INSTRUCTOR QUALIFICATIONS
The instructor identified to deliver the workshop and support the learners during
the three phases of the programme should possess the following characteristics:

1. An advanced degree (Masters a minimum) in instructional design,


educational technology, curriculum design, distance education or some
similar degree that requires the study of instructional design theories and
models.
2. Experience in designing and delivering face-to-face, blended and online
courses in academia.
3. Effective facilitation skills.
4. Knowledge of LMS and online tools.
5. Skilled using different authoring tools.

If the instructor employs teaching assistants, the TAs should be well supervised by
the instructor and should as a minimum possess the following characteristics:

1. Have completed a course in learning theory and instructional design.


2. Assisted in the design and development of several courses (at least one of
each in face-to-face, blended and online).
3. Experience with an LMS and authoring tools.
4. Expert in Microsoft Office and/Open Office tools.
5. Be expert in the use and content of the IDT.

HOW TO WORK WITH YOUR TEACHING ASSISTANTS


Teaching assistants can perform a number of functions during the conduct of the
programme. Under an instructor’s supervision a TA can:

1. During Phase 1 provide advice and technical support to participating faculty.


Specifically the TA can help to orient the faculty to the IDT and help them
install it on their computers or to access it using the Internet.
2. During the Workshop a TA can:
a. Assist faculty in troubleshooting technical issues.
b. Provide one on one advice during exercises on how to use and
populate the different templates.

3
c. Help the instructor review completed exercises.
3. During the Major Project phase a TA can:
a. Maintain regular contact with participating faculty to ensure their
projects as progressing as planned.
b. Keep records of project deliverables and progress.
c. Provide assistance to participating faculty members to complete
their projects.
d. Inform the instructor of problems experienced by the faculty
members.

Whatever role you decide to assign to your TA(s), you should meet with to discuss
their roles and how they should execute them.

PROGRAMME PRE-PLANNING
To prepare for the programme the instructor should complete the following tasks:

Four to Six Weeks Before the Workshop

1. Identify a list of programme participants with their email and phone


numbers.
2. Have programme sponsor send copies of the study package (Student Guide
and IDT DVD) to all programme participants.
3. Create a collaborative web site to be used for programme discussions, file
sharing and instructor-student feedback.
4. Prepare and send a programme introduction email to all participants (See
Appendix One).
5. Login to the collaborative site and begin to communicate with the
participants.

One Week Before the Workshop

6. Prepare and send a workshop introductory email to all participants. (See


Appendix Two).
7. Review the content of the Study Guide, master schedule and PowerPoint
presentations.
8. Ensure the computer lab is booked and the materials needed to conduct
the workshop are in place.
9. Arrange with a caterer to provide lunch and break materials.
10. Communicate to the participants the location and time to report for the
workshop.

4
MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
MANAGING TEAM ACTIVITIES

During conduct of the workshop and completion of the major project, small groups
of two and three participants can join together to plan for and complete the major
project. This is especially useful when the members of the group have the same
academic background and are teaching similar courses. To prepare for this the
facilitator should:

1. On day one of the workshop describe to the learners the potential of


completing a joint project.
2. Have each participant describe their proposed topic and project.
3. Allow some time for individuals to explore the potential of collaborating.
4. Provide guidelines on how a small group should work together.
5. During the workshop have the small group work together on the same
course outline and course plan.
6. Once they leave the workshop, ensure they continue to regularly meet to
continue to develop the learning materials or course. Follow-up with each
member with regular emails.

MANAGING INDIVIDUAL LEARNERS

The majority of projects will be completed by individuals. The facilitator can guide
the individuals and ensure:

1. Participants have a clearly defined and achievable project.


2. They understand the timeline and commitment required to complete the
project.
3. Enter into an agreed upon set of project milestones for each participant.

Once each participant completes the workshop and returns to their


office/institution they often get caught up in their day to day work and the major
project is often put on the back burner. To help keep the participants on task the
facilitator should:

1. Remind participants that a milestone date is coming up.


2. Communicate with participants struggling to complete their projects.
3. Encourage the participants to submit something to the facilitator for review
and feedback; even if it is only partially done.
4. Accept the fact that not everyone is going to complete their major project.

MAJOR PROJECT

5
The major project is an unmarked activity, but facilitators must be prepared to
provide on-going feedback to participants as participants move through the
programme.

The key is to ensure the participants choose a project that they have academic
expertise in and in a project that that they will use once it is completed. On-going
and supportive feedback will also encourage participants to seek input from the
facilitator.

POST PROGRAMME ACTIVITIES


Once a programme is finished the facilitator should:

1. Review his/her journal and note the presentations and guidance that
worked and those issues that caused a problem.
2. Collect and review participant input.
3. If facilitating the programme a second time (or more) make the
modifications to the PowerPoint presentations, study guide and schedule
that reflects the input from the learners and your own notes.

6
APPENDIX ONE – PROGRAMME WELCOME E-MAIL

You are invited to participate in the Instructional Design Programme starting on


<insert date>. The Programme is sponsored by <insert name of organization). The
Programme will be facilitated by <insert name>.

The Instructional Design Programme is designed for lecturers and other staff who
want to learn how to develop teaching and learning materials in accordance with
the Instructional Design Process (ISD), using the new COL Instructional Design Tool
(IDT) and supporting templates. The programme will address the issues and
challenges of materials development in introducing more flexible and blended
approaches to the delivery of instruction using a variety of different media.

The Programme is delivered in three phases: Pre-Workshop Activities; a five day


Workshop; and Major Project. You will be guided through each phase by a
facilitator provided by the sponsor. He or she will communicate with you regularly
to support your study efforts and provide guidance as you move through the
programme.

To assist in the communications and sharing portion of the Programme we have


created a collaborative web site at: <insert URL>. Everyone participating in the
programme is expected to regularly check the site and share information and files
with the facilitator and your peers. To access the site use the following login that
has been created for you:

Login: (Insert custom login).

Password: <Insert custom PWD)

To learn more about the programme you have been sent a Study Guide and DVD
with the IDT tool and templates. Further information about the programme is
available on the collaborative web site.

If you have any questions about the programme after reviewing the Study Guide
and web site or questions about your participation in the programme please contact
the sponsor at <insert email and phone number>.

7
APPENDIX TWO – W ORKSHOP INTRODUCTION EMAIL
I am <insert facilitator name>, your workshop facilitator. I look forward to working
with everyone and meeting you during the five day workshop at the <insert
institution name> from <insert dates>. The location and timing of the workshop will
be communicated to you by <insert workshop sponsor> shortly.

You were sent a copy of the Study Guide and a DVD with that contains the
Instructional Design Tool. By now you should have reviewed the Study Guide and
become familiar with the Instructional Design Tool content. If you haven’t done so
yet please review the five phases of ISD described on the tool and access the
various references and background information provided on each screen before
attending the workshop.

If you are having problems with the IDT or did not receive your Instructional Design
package yet please contact the <insert workshop sponsor> at <insert email and
phone number>.

I would like everyone to introduce themselves so that we can get to know one
another before we begin the workshop. Your introductions should be posted on the
following collaborative site (insert URL) that has been created to support
completion of the ISD programme. You should have been sent a separate login and
password to the site when you received your Study package.

To kick things off I have pasted my backgrounder below. I would ask that each of
you provide a similar backgrounder by replying to this message and posting your
own background information. I would ask that you describe what you hope to gain
from this workshop and potentially what type of course design project you would
like to begin as part of the learning experience.

BACKGROUNDER – <FACILITATOR NAME>

<Insert background information with emphasis on Instructional Design knowledge


and experiences>.

Contact Information

<Insert phone and email information>

Common questions

Powered by AI

A collaborative website is vital in the Instructional Design Programme as it serves as a central platform for communication, file sharing, and feedback between participants and instructors. It supports the programme's phased approach by ensuring continuous engagement and knowledge exchange outside of formal workshop hours. Participants can access the site to retrieve resources, post assignments, and interface with their peers, which fosters a community of learning. This continuous interaction encourages collaborative problem-solving and enhances individual learning experiences by providing diverse perspectives on educational materials development .

Based on participant feedback, the Instructional Design Programme can be modified to better align with user needs and improve effectiveness. Facilitators can review their journals and collected participant input to identify successful strategies and problematic areas. For future iterations, modifications could include adjustments to PowerPoint presentations, study guides, and the schedule to incorporate feedback and personal reflections from the facilitator's experiences. This iterative process ensures the programme remains relevant, user-friendly, and effective in its instructional objectives .

An instructor should undertake several key preparation steps four to six weeks before the workshop to ensure programme readiness. These include identifying programme participants, sending out the study package, creating a collaborative website for discussions and feedback, and preparing introductory communications. These steps are crucial as they establish initial contact, provide necessary resources, and lay the groundwork for ongoing communication, thereby ensuring participants are well-prepared and engaged from the outset of the workshop .

Conducting the workshop over an extended period of one day a week for five weeks presents challenges, primarily because it increases the likelihood of participants missing sessions and struggling to re-engage with the course material. This scheduling option can disrupt the learning continuity and progress as participants might get involved in their regular work routines. The spread-out timing also requires additional review time at the start of each session to catch up on missed points, making it the least favored option compared to more concentrated scheduling formats .

The Instructional Design Programme is structured into three key phases: Pre-Workshop Activities, Workshop, and Major Project. Each phase is strategically designed to develop educational competencies incrementally. Pre-Workshop Activities involve familiarizing participants with the Instructional Design Tool (IDT) and the Study Guide, laying foundational knowledge for learning material development. The Workshop phase, conducted over five full days or equivalent sessions, provides hands-on instruction and support, focusing on practical application of instructional design principles. The Major Project phase allows participants to apply what they've learned to a real-world project, ensuring the material is relevant and contributes to long-term educational improvements .

Dividing workshop sessions into ten half-day sessions has instructional advantages, including allowing learners more time to digest content and apply what they have learned in smaller increments. This approach can lead to deeper understanding as participants have more opportunities to reflect and work on their projects between sessions. It also maintains consistent instructor access, which supports immediate clarification of doubts and enhances learning outcomes. The potential downside is if learners become disengaged over the longer course duration, but overall, it presents a balance between intensive learning and practical application .

Management strategies for individual learners focus on clear project definition, milestone setting, and consistent reminder communication to prevent projects from being neglected due to daily work distractions. Conversely, group projects emphasize collaboration, requiring guidelines for group dynamics and joint execution of project parts, with continuous facilitation even after formal workshop sessions. Individual learners might struggle with self-motivation and timeline adherence, while group projects might face coordination challenges and disparity in member contributions, posing risks to consistent progress and quality .

A facilitator should proactively address participants failing to meet project milestones by reminding them of upcoming deadlines and offering support to overcome obstacles. Strategies include establishing a communication channel to understand the participant's challenges, providing tailored advice, and encouraging partial submission for feedback to promote continuous progress. Facilitators should also accept that not all participants will complete their projects and employ motivational techniques to sustain engagement and commitment throughout the programme .

Teaching assistants (TAs) play a crucial role in supporting the success of the Instructional Design Programme by providing technical support and advice during each programme phase. They help orient faculty to the IDT and troubleshoot technical issues during workshops, enhancing learning experiences. TAs are expected to have completed courses in learning theory and instructional design, possess experience with LMS and authoring tools, and be experts in using the IDT. These skills enable TAs to assist in reviewing exercises and maintaining project progress, thus ensuring that educational goals are met in a structured and efficient manner .

Having hands-on experience with the Instructional Design Tool (IDT) prior to the workshop is essential as it allows participants to become familiar with the tool's interface and functionalities, leading to a more effective learning experience during the workshop. This prior exposure enables participants to engage more efficiently with facilitated activities, reduces the learning curve, and maximizes the time spent on advanced instructional design concepts and practical applications. The expected benefits include more in-depth discussions and a smoother application of instructional design principles when developing learning materials .

You might also like