0% found this document useful (0 votes)
109 views2 pages

Worsley's South Pole Expedition Review

The document discusses a recent expedition to the South Pole led by Henry Worsley to retrace the route of Ernest Shackleton's failed 1908 expedition. Worsley is a descendant of one of Shackleton's team members. The interviewee, Leo Stone, describes how Worsley's team spent five years preparing for the trip, which involved physical training as well as getting financially and mentally prepared. While Worsley's team had modern equipment, they still faced challenging conditions like high winds and altitude sickness. Though Worsley succeeded in reaching the South Pole, Leo admires how Shackleton valued saving his team over achieving his goal.

Uploaded by

Sam Smith
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
109 views2 pages

Worsley's South Pole Expedition Review

The document discusses a recent expedition to the South Pole led by Henry Worsley to retrace the route of Ernest Shackleton's failed 1908 expedition. Worsley is a descendant of one of Shackleton's team members. The interviewee, Leo Stone, describes how Worsley's team spent five years preparing for the trip, which involved physical training as well as getting financially and mentally prepared. While Worsley's team had modern equipment, they still faced challenging conditions like high winds and altitude sickness. Though Worsley succeeded in reaching the South Pole, Leo admires how Shackleton valued saving his team over achieving his goal.

Uploaded by

Sam Smith
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Gold First Coursebook Audio Script

Unit 4, Listening Focus Activity 3


Track 1.15

Presenter: Today on the travel programme, we’re reviewing a book called Following in
Shackleton’s Footsteps by Henry Worsley. It tells the story of Worsley’s recent
expedition to the South Pole exactly one hundred years after Shackleton’s
famous failed expedition of 1908. It’s been chosen by my guest, Leo Stone,
himself the veteran of several polar expeditions. Welcome to the programme,
Leo.
Leo: Thank you.
Presenter: First of all can you tell us about Worsley and his team?
Leo: Sure. The really unusual thing about this trip is that Worsley and his team are all
related to members of Shackleton’s team. Worsley is a descendant of
Shackleton’s captain, Frank Worsley.
Presenter: So they had some unfinished family business.
Leo: Exactly. Worsley took the compass Shackleton used and his diary all the way to
the South Pole. Apparently this trip had been a lifelong ambition for him.
Shackleton’d had to turn back before reaching the South Pole and Worsley
wanted to finish the journey.
Presenter: Amazing. Did the trip take a long time to organise?
Leo: Yes. It took them five years to prepare for this trip. They had to find the money,
which was no easy task. As you can imagine, the costs involved were enormous.
Then there was the physical training. You’d think this would be the hardest part,
but Worsley’d been in the army so he was used to this kind of thing. And one of
the team members had run a few marathons, so they were all relatively fit. It
was actually the mental challenge that Worsley’s team struggled with most;
having to get their heads around a nine hundred mile journey.
Presenter: So was the trip any easier for the 21st century team?
Leo: In some ways yes. But they still had to walk for ten hours a day with all their
equipment. And then they had to put up their tent and cook a meal in what
Worsley describes as a ‘frozen hell’. But Shackleton was travelling into the
unknown with only a compass to guide him, while Worsley’s team had a map
and modern navigation equipment.
Presenter: And did they experience any of the same problems?
Leo: They did. For example, Worsley and his team had to spend two days in their tent
because high winds made it impossible to continue, which Shackleton also
endured. But it was worse for Shackleton because they were also very low on
food at that point. And one of Shackleton’s men fell seriously ill, which luckily the
21st century team was spared.
Presenter: Did Worsley feel confident that he would reach the South Pole?
Leo: Yes, but he faced some very tough moments. Like Shackleton, Worsley’s team
went up the Beardmore Glacier, which was incredibly dangerous with huge
crevasses everywhere. And just when Worsley thought it couldn’t get any worse,
they reached the Antarctic plateau. This proved to be even tougher going than
the glacier. It’s the coldest, driest place on earth and both teams experienced
symptoms of altitude sickness. It was when he came face to face with the
brutality of conditions there that Shackleton began to doubt he’d ever reach the
Pole.
Presenter: Which part of the book did you enjoy the most?
Leo: The climax of the book is definitely when Worsley and his team arrived at the
place where Shackleton decided to turn back. They arrived there on the 100th
anniversary and the excitement and sense of joy is really inspiring and
memorable – better even than the part where they get to the Pole itself or the
huge sense of relief at arriving back safely. There’re some amazing photos too.
Presenter: Do you think Shackleton deserves his reputation as a great hero?
Leo: Yes, I do. I’ve always really admired Shackleton, and anyone who doesn’t know
anything about him should definitely read this book. His decision to turn back to
save his men took great courage. That’s why I think he’s such a hero. He never
did reach his goal and it was Roald Amundsen who finally made it to the South
Pole in 1911. There are so many lessons we…

Unit 4, Speaking focus Activity 2


Track 1.16

Examiner: I’d like you to talk together for about three minutes. I’d like you to imagine that
you are going on an expedition to a desert island. Here are some survival skills
you might need on the island. First, discuss how difficult it would be to learn
these survival skills. Then decide which one would be the most useful on the
island. OK?

Unit 4, Speaking focus Activity 3


Track 1.17

Marc: Yes, I agree.


Alice: OK. Shall we talk about how useful each skill is?
Marc: Yes. OK. For me, the least useful thing is fishing with your bare hands. I think
this would be incredibly hard and it would also take up a lot of time.
Alice: That’s true. You could spend ages trying to catch a fish and end up with nothing.
I think that’s the last thing I’d want to learn.
Marc: Another reason for putting this at the bottom of the list is that it’s not a useful
skill when you leave the island because everyone uses a fishing rod to catch fish.
Alice: So basically we’re saying it isn’t useful at all. And don’t you think it could also be
dangerous? There are many fish that could bite your hand and if you’re not
familiar with the type of fish in the area, you could end up hurting yourself quite
seriously.
Marc: That’s a good point.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Worsley's expedition differed from Shackleton's in that it benefited from modern navigation and gear, while Shackleton faced the unknown with only a compass. Both expeditions encountered severe weather conditions, such as high winds forcing them to stop. However, Shackleton's team also dealt with being low on food and faced illness, which Worsley's team avoided. Nonetheless, both expeditions faced the treacherous Beardmore Glacier and the extreme conditions of the Antarctic plateau, where altitude sickness was an issue. Despite these differences in logistical challenges, the psychological and physical hardships, like enduring long days of travel in a 'frozen hell,' were similar .

One of the greatest physical challenges for Worsley's team was traveling the 900-mile journey while navigating the dangerous crevasses of the Beardmore Glacier and the harsh conditions of the Antarctic plateau, described as the coldest and driest place on earth. On the mental front, preparing for the concept of such a long and challenging journey was significant, as was dealing with the monotony and isolation of the environment. Although physically fit, the adaptation to the intensive demands of travel and the weather conditions proved mentally taxing .

The arrival at Shackleton’s turn-back point holds significant thematic weight in Worsley’s narrative as it represents the fulfillment of a historical journey and the closing of a 100-year-old family and exploration legacy. It symbolizes triumph over historical and personal challenges, evoking excitement and inspiration. This moment surpasses even reaching the Pole or returning safely, emphasizing the theme of completing unfinished business and honoring past explorers' legacies .

Modern advancements, such as navigational mapping and better camping gear, provided Worsley’s team with greater logistical security and confidence compared to Shackleton’s predicament of navigating the unknown with only a compass. These advancements allowed for more precise planning and execution, potentially lowering perceived risk and increasing the likelihood of mission success. Despite this, the extreme conditions of the Antarctic meant reality still posed significant challenges similar to Shackleton's era, although with reduced existential threats due to improved technology .

Worsley’s team found the psychological factors, such as the isolation, monotony, and mental perseverance required for the 900-mile journey, to be more challenging than the physical demands. While they were prepared for physical difficulties due to their backgrounds in the army and marathon running, adapting to continuous effort in harsh conditions was mentally strenuous. This psychological endurance was critical to surviving the demands of the expedition, juxtaposed with the physical routine of traveling and surviving in the Antarctic environment .

For Worsley's expedition, the process of securing funding took five years, indicating the substantial costs and logistical planning required. This involved not just financial backing but also extensive physical training and preparation for the journey's mental demands, which differed from Shackleton’s era, where exploration motivations often led to funding driven by national pride and prestige. Worsley had the advantage of modern marketing and sponsorship channels compared to the early 20th-century expeditions .

Worsley's use of Shackleton's personal items, like the compass and diary, serves to forge a tangible link between past and present explorations, enriching the narrative with a symbolic continuity. It underscores themes of legacy, historical honor, and the connection across generations of explorers. These items represent the endurance of exploratory spirit and family tradition, providing both motivational and symbolic conduits for Worsley's journey, aligning his modern quest with Shackleton’s historical endeavor .

Henry Worsley's motivation to undertake the expedition to the South Pole was largely driven by a personal and familial legacy, as he was a descendant of Shackleton’s captain, Frank Worsley. His trip was a lifelong ambition to complete what Shackleton could not—reaching the South Pole—which had been previously left unfinished. In contrast, Shackleton's original expedition was driven by the desire for exploration and the ambition to be the first to reach the South Pole. Worsley's expedition also had the added symbolic aim of connecting with Shackleton’s history and finishing the journey on its 100th anniversary .

Both Worsley and Shackleton faced the extreme challenges of the Antarctic plateau, known as the coldest, driest place on earth. For Worsley, despite having modern equipment, the plateau presented immense difficulties with symptoms of altitude sickness, similar to Shackleton’s experience. Shackleton's encounter with the plateau was accompanied by doubt about reaching the Pole, directly influencing his decision to turn back in order to save his team, which showcased the plateau’s psychological toll. The plateau symbolized the ultimate test of endurance for both expeditions .

Worsley's journey reaffirms Shackleton’s heroism by highlighting the courage and leadership required to make life-saving decisions, such as turning back to save his men despite not reaching his goal. Shackleton's commitment to his team elevates his status as a hero. Worsley's successful completion of Shackleton's journey further celebrates Shackleton's legacy by emphasizing the risks and sacrifices involved, demonstrating that true heroism sometimes lies in prioritizing human life over personal achievement .

You might also like